Christians – Communal Violence

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Christians – Communal Violence Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: IND30502 Country: India Date: 31 August 2006 Title: India – Kerala – Governments – Christians – Communal violence This response was prepared by the Country Research Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Questions 1. Which government is in power in India currently? 2. Which government is in power in Kerala specifically? 3. Please indicate the location of Kerala in terms of Mumbai. 4. What are the key instances of violence in Kerala against Christians going back up to 6 years? RESPONSE 1. Which government is in power in India currently? The Congress Party has been in power since the elections in May 2004 (‘Country Profile: India’ (undated) BBC News, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/country_profiles/1154019.stm – Accessed 29 August 2006 – Attachment 1). 2. Which government is in power in Kerala specifically? The LDF (Left Democratic Front), which holds 98 out of the 140 seats in the States Unicarmel Legislature was sworn in 18 May 2006. Main parties in the LDF are the Communist Party of India (Marxist) (61 seats) and the Communist Party of India (17 seats) (‘Political Background of the State of Kerala’ (undated) Kerala State Government Website http://www.kerala.gov.in/knowkerala/political.htm – Accessed 25 August 2006 – Attachment 2) 3. Please indicate the location of Kerala in terms of Mumbai. Kerala State lies south of Mumbai on the West coast of India. North to South, the State is approximately 750 and 2000km’s respectively from Mumbai (Encarta Map – Attachment 3). 4. What are the key instances of violence in Kerala against Christians going back up to 6 years? A search was made of the resources available to the Tribunal going back to 2000 to identify instances of violence against Christians in Kerala. A report on Rediff concerning a murder in Uttar Pradesh shows how such events appeared not to be occurring in Kerala: John Dayal, national secretary, All-India Catholic Union, termed the murder of a priest near Mathura in Uttar Pradesh on June 6 as a blot on the nation. He accused the Centre of doing nothing to book the culprits. “An inquiry will not come up with any result. It will only lead to more crime,” he quipped. David Scamands, president, Karnataka Christian Association and deputy chairman of the Karnataka Legislative Council, said the Christian Council had documented 30 major instances of violence in Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka. He wanted to know what the Centre was doing about it. Dr K P Yohanan, vice-chairman of the Kerala Christian Council, said the UP murder had shocked Kerala Christians. An emergency meeting of the KCC has been called to discuss these incidents (Jafri S.A. 2000, ‘Christian leaders demand reconstitution of Central Minorities Commission’ 10 June, rediff.com http://www.rediff.com/news/2000/jun/10ap1.htm – Accessed 30 August 2006 – Attachment 4). In early 2003 an American missionary was attacked: An American missionary has been attacked in southern India by right-wing Hindus allegedly belonging to a group close to the ruling party. Joseph W Cooper, 68, who is from Pennsylvania, received knife wounds in the assault in Kerala state in which five others were also hurt. Police say they have arrested five activists of the hardline Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). Eyewitnesses say Mr Cooper, a visiting preacher, was surrounded by an armed gang of 10 people as he was returning from a prayer meeting. “We were approaching our car when the unexpected attack took place,” Pastor Benson Sam told the BBC. A police spokesman said Mr Cooper had sustained a deep cut in his right palm. “The gang attacked Cooper and others with swords, sticks and iron bars. “As other church members rushed to the scene the attackers fled,” he was quoted as saying by the AFP news agency. A local pastor, his wife and two children and one other person were also injured. But local RSS leaders deny the movement had anything to do with the attack (‘US missionary attacked in India’ 2003, BBC News, 15 January http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2659785.stm – Accessed 29 August 2006 – Attachment 5). A report released several months later, and reported by Compass Direct, noted: Following its investigation into the January attack on U.S. missionary Joseph Cooper, the Confederation of Human Rights Organization (CHRO) has concluded that the crime was the result of a conspiracy by a local unit of the nationalist Hindu Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). …. An earlier investigation conducted by the National Commission for Minorities (NCM) reported that the attack was not planned, but occurred as a public outcry against the “wrongdoings and immoral acts by Rev. Benson’s family in the area.” The American missionary was an unwitting victim of a scandal, the NCM reported. Sources say the CHRO findings are more trustworthy than the report from the government- controlled NCM. Leading religious rights advocates in India say John Joseph, who supervised the NCM report, has ties with the RSS. The CHRO team reported that RSS activists threatened some witnesses and attempted to bribe others with promises of government funding for local development projects in order to prevent police action against Cooper’s attackers. The RSS has been terrorizing the low caste Vedar community in the area for some time, investigators said. Careful planning had gone into the attack. Local RSS workers were mobilized in anticipation of the convention when it was announced that Cooper would be participating. During the meetings, assailants deflated the tires of the vehicle carrying the missionary and his Indian companions. As the group walked toward the automobile, attackers hurled homemade bombs to scare away local people (Prabhu, A. 2003 ‘Hindu Fundamentalists Plotted Attack on American Missionary’ Compass Direct, 14 March – Attachment 6) A report by Frontline drew a connection between the attack on Cooper and Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) a: Early last year, the attack on an American missionary, Joseph William Cooper, in Thiruvananthapuram, almost coincided with the two-day `Vanavasi Sangamom’ organised by the Sangh Parivar at Mananthavadi in Wayanad district, to promote the all-India game plan of “Hinduising” tribal people. The high-profile conference, attended by top Sangh Parivar leaders, was itself preceded by events orchestrated by the VHP and other Hindutva organisations to “celebrate the reconversion of (a few) Adivasis to Hinduism”. The Matsya Pravartaka Sanghom, another RSS family unit, recently started a mobilisation initiative, organising `Sagara poojas’ (worshipping the sea) and Hindu maha sammelans at select centres in the coastal areas and near freshwater lakes. This is but an example of the vast infrastructure the RSS-led Hindutva organisations have established in Kerala, which it considers a sunrise region for interventions tailored to bring about a fundamentalist shift in the thinking of Hindus. But the Hindu community, whose loyalties are divided among various political parties and coalitions, castes and caste-based political groups, has so far given no indications of helping the Parivar realise its dream (Krishnakumar, R. 2004, ‘The spread in the South’, Frontline, Vol 21: Issue 06, March 13 – March 26 http://www.frontlineonnet.com/fl2106/stories/20040326004900900.htm – Accessed 6 January 2005 – Attachment 7). In 2003 a spokespersons for the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of India and for the Vatican noted: Spokespersons for the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of India and for the Vatican noted that the number of physical attacks against Christians has decreased since 2000. However, anti- Christian violence, including killings, continued. In addition, Hindu nationalists began an ideological campaign to limit access to Christian institutions and discourage or, in some cases, prohibit conversions to Christianity (‘International Religious Freedom Report 2003’ 2003, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, December 18 www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2003/24470pf.htm – Accessed 19 December 2003 – Attachment 8). Three priests and six nuns were attacked in September 2004 as reported by the BBC which also contains a comment from S.K. George about the murder of a priest the previous month: Police in the southern Indian state of Kerala have detained 15 people following two attacks on nuns and priests of the Missionaries of Charity. The three priests and six nuns were reportedly attacked in separate incidences on the outskirts of Kozhikode on Saturday. A representative of Indian Christians has blamed the attacks on members of right-wing Hindu political parties. Kerala’s chief minister has promised to act against those responsible. The national convenor of the Bangalore-based Global Council for Indian Christians Sajan K George said members of the right-wing Hindu parties Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) were behind the attack. Mr George said the attackers had raised banners with slogans in favour of RSS and BJP when they attacked the nuns, accusing them of converting Dalit Hindus. He also said state officials had been slow in responding to such incidents and last month’s murder of a Christian priest is yet to be solved. This is the first instance of attacks on nuns in Kerala. The first incident took place on Saturday morning when two nuns visited a slum on the outskirts of Kozhikode. They had carried food for slum people, mostly Dalits, who live in extreme poverty. They were allegedly pulled out of the jeep and the crosses they wore around their necks were allegedly broken (Keywords: Raman, S. 2004 ‘India nun attacks trigger arrests’, BBC News, 26 September http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/3691786.stm – Accessed 29 August 2006 – Attachment 9) In April 2005 Compass Direct reported the following attack: -- Hindu and Muslim villagers burned down a prayer hall and physically attacked three church members following a baptism ceremony in Kerala, India, on April 1.
Recommended publications
  • The Other Face of Fanaticism
    February 2, 2003 The Other Face of Fanaticism By PANKAJ MISHRA New York Times Magazine On the evening of Jan. 30, 1948, five months after the independence and partition of India, Mohandas Gandhi was walking to a prayer meeting on the grounds of his temporary home in New Delhi when he was shot three times in the chest and abdomen. Gandhi was then 78 and a forlorn figure. He had been unable to prevent the bloody creation of Pakistan as a separate homeland for Indian Muslims. The violent uprooting of millions of Hindus and Muslims across the hastily drawn borders of India and Pakistan had tainted the freedom from colonial rule that he had so arduously worked toward. The fasts he had undertaken in order to stop Hindus and Muslims from killing one another had weakened him, and when the bullets from an automatic pistol hit his frail body at point-blank range, he collapsed and died instantly. His assassin made no attempt to escape and, as he himself would later admit, even shouted for the police. Millions of shocked Indians waited for more news that night. They feared unspeakable violence if Gandhi's murderer turned out to be a Muslim. There was much relief, also some puzzlement, when the assassin was revealed as Nathuram Godse, a Hindu Brahmin from western India, a region relatively untouched by the brutal passions of the partition. Godse had been an activist in the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (National Volunteers Association, or R.S.S.), which was founded in the central Indian city of Nagpur in 1925 and was devoted to the creation of a militant Hindu state.
    [Show full text]
  • Cornerstone Forum a Conversation on Religious Freedom and Its Social Implications No
    Cornerstone Forum A Conversation on Religious Freedom and Its Social Implications No. 87. June 30, 2016 Reflections from the Margins on Independence Day John Dayal Human rights and peace activist On this day, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visits the United States for the first time since his visa ban was lifted. On this momentous occasion, Cornerstone revisits the implications of Modi's rise to power. ​ ​ --- It is not a jubilee year for independent India, but it is nonetheless a landmark anniversary. Not since Mrs. Indira Gandhi lost office and Mr. Morarji Desai assumed power at the head of the Janata Party has there been such a drastic change, even a reversal, of ideologies, policies, and a vision for the future. The factors that led to the defeat of Mrs. Gandhi in 1977 are now well known. She halted democracy in its tracks and gifted the country’s governance to her son Mr. Sanjay Gandhi, who emerged as the undisputed extra-constitutional center of power and authority. For all practical purposes, the Constitution was suspended, and an unofficial dictatorship came into being. I mention the Emergency [1975-1977] for two reasons. The first reason for the total recall is that the Emergency shattered the belief that the foundations of Indian democracy are so strong and rooted in the Freedom Struggle that they cannot be shaken even momentarily. The second is that a “popular” and “strong” leader with a mass following and little opposition—and perhaps assisted by extra-constitutional power centers—can if she or he wants to, do just about anything with the governance machinery.
    [Show full text]
  • Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) – Sangh Parivar – Christians – Punjab
    Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: IND34592 Country: India Date: 2 April 2009 Keywords: India – Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) – Sangh Parivar – Christians – Punjab This response was prepared by the Research & Information Services Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. This research response may not, under any circumstance, be cited in a decision or any other document. Anyone wishing to use this information may only cite the primary source material contained herein. Questions 1. What is the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and the Hindu Sangh Parivar? 2. What anti-Christian activities have they been involved in, in Punjab, over the past couple of years? RESPONSE 1. What is the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and the Hindu Sangh Parivar? An RRT research response dated 13 February 2009 provides information on the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and the Sangh Parivar (RRT Research & Information 2009, Research Response IND34298, 13 February (Question 1) – Attachment 1). The documents referred to in the research response include a research paper dated 2 May 2007 by the International Affairs and Defence Section of the UK Parliament House of Commons Library which indicates that: The BJP [Bharatiya Janata Party] is the political wing of the Sangh Parivar, a group of Hindu nationalist organisations which includes the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a national volunteer organisation, and the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), an organisation of Hindu monks.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on International Religious Freedom 2006: India
    India Page 1 of 22 India International Religious Freedom Report 2006 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor The constitution provides for freedom of religion, and the Government generally respected this right in practice. However, the Government sometimes did not act swiftly enough to counter effectively societal attacks against religious minorities and attempts by some leaders of state and local governments to limit religious freedom. This resulted in part from legal constraints on national government action inherent in the country's federal structure and from shortcomings in its law enforcement and justice systems, although courts regularly upheld the constitutional provision of religious freedom. Despite Government efforts to foster communal harmony, some extremists continued to view ineffective investigation and prosecution of attacks on religious minorities, particularly at the state and local level, as a signal that they could commit such violence with impunity, although numerous cases were in the courts at the end of the reporting period. While the National Government took positive steps in key areas to improve religious freedom, the status of religious freedom generally remained the same during the period covered by this report. The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) continued to implement an inclusive and secular platform based on respect for the country's traditions of secular government and religious tolerance, and the rights of religious minorities. Terrorists attempted to provoke religious conflict by attacking Hindu Temples in Ayodhya and Varanasi. The Government reacted in a swift manner to rein in Hindu extremists, prevent revenge attacks and reprisal, and assure the Muslim community of its safety.
    [Show full text]
  • India – Goa – Evangelical Christians – Shiv Sena – RSS – Jamat-E-Islami
    Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: IND31233 Country: India Date: 2 February 2007 Keywords: India – Goa – Evangelical Christians – Shiv Sena – RSS – Jamat-e-Islami This response was prepared by the Country Research Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Questions 1. What is the activity of the Bajrang Dal, Jamaat -E-Islam, Rashtriya Swayam Sevak and Shiv Sena against evangelical Christians in Goa? 2. What difficulties do evangelical Christians face in Goa? 3. Would the police in Goa condone and/or be involved in discrimination / persecution against evangelical Christians in Goa by these groups? RESPONSE 1. What is the activity of the above mentioned four groups against evangelical Christians in Goa? 2. What difficulties do evangelical Christians face in Goa? 3. Would the police in Goa condone and/or be involved in discrimination / persecution against evangelical Christians in Goa by these groups? The state of Goa has a significant Christian population. According to the 2001 India census, Goa has a Christian population of 359,568 on a total population of 1,347,668 (there are 886,551 Hindus and 92,210 Muslims). Christianity, and the Catholic Church in particular, has played a significant role in Goa’s history and since Goa’s 1962 integration into the Indian Union this has continued to be the case. Studies of the Goan Christian identity, such as Dr Charles Borges’ 2000 study, tend to emphasize the inclusion and participation of the Christian population in Goa’s social and political life (‘Population by religious communities’ (undated), Census of India website http://demotemp257.nic.in/httpdoc/Census_Data_2001/Census_data_finder/C_Series/Populat ion_by_religious_communities.htm – Accessed 31 January 2007 – Attachment 24; Borges, C.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Days Under the New Regime the State of Minorities 100 Days Under the New Regime the State of Minorities
    100 Days Under the New Regime The State of Minorities 100 Days Under the New Regime The State of Minorities A Report Edited by John Dayal ISBN: 978-81-88833-35-1 Suggested Contribution : Rs 100 Published by Anhad INDIA HAS NO PLACE FOR HATE AND NEEDS NOT A TEN-YEAR MORATORIUM BUT AN END TO COMMUNAL AND TARGETTED VIOLENCE AGAINST RELIGIOUS MINORITIES A report on the ground situation since the results of the General Elections were announced on16th May 2014 NEW DELHI, September 27th, 2014 The Prime Minister, Mr. Narendra Modi, led by Bharatiya Janata Party to a resounding victory in the general elections of 2014, riding a wave generated by his promise of “development” and assisted by a remarkable mass mobilization in one of the most politically surcharged electoral campaigns in the history of Independent India. When the results were announced on 16th May 2014, the BJP had won 280 of the 542 seats, with no party getting even the statutory 10 per cent of the seats to claim the position of Leader of the Opposition. The days, weeks and months since the historic victory, and his assuming ofice on 26th May 2014 as the 14th Prime Minister of India, have seen the rising pitch of a crescendo of hate speech against Muslims and Christians. Their identity derided,their patriotism scoffed at, their citizenship questioned, their faith mocked. The environment has degenerated into one of coercion, divisiveness, and suspicion. This has percolated to the small towns and villages or rural India, severing bonds forged in a dialogue of life over the centuries, shattering the harmony build around the messages of peace and brotherhood given us by the Suis and the men and women who led the Freedom Struggle under Mahatma Gandhi.
    [Show full text]
  • Responding to Violence in the Homeland: Identity and Transnational Activism Within the Indian Christian Diaspora
    1 RESPONDING TO VIOLENCE IN THE HOMELAND: IDENTITY AND TRANSNATIONAL ACTIVISM WITHIN THE INDIAN CHRISTIAN DIASPORA A dissertation presented By Autumn L. Mathias to The Department of Sociology & Anthropology In partial fulfillment for the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the field of Sociology Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts October 2017 2 RESPONDING TO VIOLENCE IN THE HOMELAND: IDENTITY AND TRANSNATIONAL ACTIVISM WITHIN THE INDIAN CHRISTIAN DIASPORA A dissertation presented By Autumn L. Mathias ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology in the College of Social Sciences and Humanities of Northeastern University October 2017 3 ABSTRACT Within the last twenty years, instances of violence against Christian minorities in India have drawn international attention. The rise of the Hindu nationalist movement and concordant political shifts are often cited as precipitating factors to what many deem as systematic religious persecution. However, few sociological studies have investigated how Indian Christians in diaspora have reacted to these significant events. To explore this topic, I employed a qualitative, phenomenological approach including in-depth interviews with forty-seven individuals residing in the United States and Canada, participant observation at six events, and a review of diasporic and India-based media. Throughout this dissertation, I advance the argument that diaspora Indian Christians’ perceptions of and responses to persecution are connected in a nuanced way to translocational positionality. More specifically, remembrances of persecution events, perceptions of the causes of these events, types of transnational responses, motivations for spiritual and/or political forms of activism, and engagement in ecumenical and/or interreligious networks are inherently linked and best understood within an integrated theoretical framework including translocational positionality, transnational social fields, memory, and the social ecological model.
    [Show full text]
  • John Dayal Interim Report
    3 0 0 DAYS Interim Report John Dayal 300 DAYS Documenting Hate and Communal Violence under the Modi Regime JOHN DAYAL (With inputs from Kiren Shaheen, Liris Thomas, Mansi Sharma, Shabnam Hashmi, Shahnaz Husain, Tehmina Arora, and Vijayesh Lal) Executive Summary: The rape of a 70 year old Nun in West Bengal in an attack ona convent and school in February 2015 sent shockwaves throughout India, and the world. “Protect not just Cows, but human beings also,” said Cardinal Baselios Cleemis, President of the Catholic Bishops Conference. At least 43deaths in over 600 cases of violence, 149 targeting Christians and the rest Muslims, have taken place in 2014 in India till March this year, marking 300 days of the National Development Alliance government of Mr. Narendra Modi. The number of dead is other than the 108 killed in Assam in attacks by armed tribal political groups on Muslims. Desecration and destruction of churches, assault on pastors, illegal police detention of church workers, and denial of Constitutional rights of Freedom of Faith aggravate the coercion and terror unleashed in campaigns of Ghar Wapsiand cries of Love Jihad. Since May 2014, there has been a marked shift in public discourse. There has been a relentless foregrounding of communal identities, a ceaseless attempt to create a divide between ‘us’ and ‘them’. The BJP leaders guaranteed to abuse, ridicule and threaten minorities. Hate statements by Union and state ministers, threats by Members of Parliament, state politicians, and cadres in saffron caps or Khaki shorts resonate through the landscape. But most cases go unreported, unrecorded by police.
    [Show full text]
  • A House of Cards
    Table of Contents INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 1 ABOUT THE REPORT................................................................................................................. 3 REPORT STRUCTURE ................................................................................................................ 6 CONTROVERSIAL QUOTES AND STATEMENTS ................................................................. 7 CHAPTER 1. Coalition Against Genocide – An Introduction............................................... 9 Section 1.01 Some Activities of the CAG......................................................................................10 Section 1.02 100,000 = 200,000 ......................................................................................................11 Section 1.03 Organizations in the CAG........................................................................................ 13 CHAPTER 2. Shaping Views and Policies on India and Hinduism.................................... 14 CHAPTER 3. CAG’s Propaganda Network.......................................................................... 15 Section 3.01 The Radical Leftist Propaganda Network .............................................................. 16 Figure 1 – FOIL’s Network in Cyberspace – A Bird’s Eye View ......................................................................17 Table 1 – Site Registration Information for FOIL and its Affiliates...................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of the Naz Foundation's Campaign to Decriminalize Homosexuality in India Preston G
    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Capstone Collection SIT Graduate Institute Winter 12-4-2017 Lessons for Legalizing Love: A Case Study of the Naz Foundation's Campaign to Decriminalize Homosexuality in India Preston G. Johnson SIT Graduate Institute Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/capstones Part of the Civic and Community Engagement Commons, Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Gender and Sexuality Commons, History of Gender Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legislation Commons, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Studies Commons, Litigation Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Political Science Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons, Sexuality and the Law Commons, Social Policy Commons, Sociology of Culture Commons, and the South and Southeast Asian Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Johnson, Preston G., "Lessons for Legalizing Love: A Case Study of the Naz Foundation's Campaign to Decriminalize Homosexuality in India" (2017). Capstone Collection. 3063. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/capstones/3063 This Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Graduate Institute at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Capstone Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Asia Overview
    ASIA 165 OVERVIEW In East and Southeast Asia, govern- India; the aftermath of the October 1999 coup ments relied on Asian initiatives during the in Pakistan; the continuing restrictions on year to address economic, political, and hu- Aung San Suu Kyi in Burma; Indonesia’s man rights issues. Gone was the rhetoric of failure to stop militia violence in West Timor; “Asian values” with its pre-financial crisis the obstructions placed by Cambodia in the premise that economic development and pro- way of a tribunal to try the Khmer Rouge; the tection of individuals rights were incompat- arrests of political and religious activists in ible. In its place was simply a determination, China; or the coup and hostage crisis in Fiji in from democratic and authoritarian govern- May. In all these countries, domestic political ments alike, to show that solutions to Asian imperatives far outweighed any fear of inter- problems were to be found within the region, national reaction, and as it turned out, there despite the diversity of cultures and political was not much to fear from donors worried interests involved. South Asia, as always, that pressure would inflict more damage on was a region apart, so divided by rivalries and themselves than on the offending country. security concerns that regional cooperation Unlike the years immediately prior to was all but impossible. the financial crisis when East and Southeast On the economic side, one example of Asian governments steadfastly refrained from East Asian regionalism was the movement criticizing each other (South Asian govern- toward developing the equivalent of an Asian ments felt no such hesitation), Asian region- Monetary Fund involving China, Japan, South alism in 2000 was more accommodating of Korea and the ten countries of the Associa- different viewpoints.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions of Remarks E1501 HON. DONNA M. CHRISTENSEN HON
    August 2, 2001 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks E1501 tax bill provides incentives for domestic film to the United States, there was scouting of a and can create a positive relationship between production. It must use all resources to cure sort that for all intent and purposes was open management and workers, where both reap the concerns presented in the two reports only to children of the military. However, it was rewards for successful company performance. outlined in this Article. Organizations, such For nearly 30 years the Internal Revenue as SAG, must work with Congress to develop not until February of 1930, just three years a proposal that is acceptable in terms of cost after Scouting was established in Puerto Rico, Service (IRS) has taken the position that the and other political considerations. that the first official Boy Scout Troop was income from these stock options is not subject While it seems unlikely that there is the formed in the United States Virgin Islands. to employment taxes. However, recent audits political will or desire to match the incen- Mr. Speaker, history was made twice on the and rulings on specific companies have raised tives offered by many of our competitors, it first of January 1965 when the Virgin Islands the troubling prospect that the IRS now be- is conceivable to the authors that an effec- got their own Boy Scout Council and Mr. Sam- lieves that employment taxes should be with- tive approach can be designed to substan- uel B. King became the first black council ex- held from the paychecks of individuals who tially close the gap on cost savings without ecutive in the entire Boy Scout movement in exercise stock options under these plans.
    [Show full text]