Attachment 6
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Attendance Audit Summary
ATTENDANCE AUDIT SUMMARY CES® 2020 January 7-10, 2020 Las Vegas, Nevada CES.tech Letter from Consumer Technology Association (CTA)® For more than 50 years, CES® has served as a global platform for companies to share innovative technology with the world. In these challenging times, CES showcases the spirit of innovation and brings together energy and creativity that will enable technology to make the world healthier, safer, more resilient and connected. CES 2020 featured transformative technologies such as artificial intelligence, the 5G ecosystem and mobile connectivity. CES 2020 inspired and connected major industries across the globe and highlighted trends that are now more important than ever, including non-traditional tech and tech for good. We are certain that technology, including the innovations at CES, will help energize the global economy and pull the world through the current crisis to emerge safer and stronger than before. CES 2020 hosted 4419 exhibiting companies across more than 2.9 million net square feet and attracted a total attendance of 171,268, including 6517 members of media. This result aligns with our strategy of managing attendee numbers and attracting the most highly qualified attendees. CES is one of a select group of trade shows that follow the strict auditing requirements set by UFI, the Global Association of the Exhibition Industry. CES adheres to these requirements to ensure that you have the most detailed and accurate information on CES’s trade event attendance. To help you succeed and grow your business, we are proud to provide you with this independently audited attendance data in our CES 2020 Attendance Audit Summary. -
Liz Claman Shirt Rips Open CONTACT Liz Claman Shirt Rips Open Ipod Touch 16Gig Ebay Nutrisystem Provides a Simple and Delicious Recipe for a Mint Chocolate Smoothie
Why doctors are no longer using metformin Car aident attorneys phoenix Corticosteroid conversion oral to iv Calculator soup unblocked Casino for xbox Liz claman shirt rips open CONTACT Liz claman shirt rips open ipod touch 16gig ebay Nutrisystem provides a simple and delicious recipe for a Mint Chocolate Smoothie. Buy Nutrisystem® Turbo Chocolate Shake, 20 count on oagipt.xsl.pt FREE on qualified orders How Much do the Nutrisystem Shakes Cost?. TurboShake Chocolate (7 Pack) = $ Nutrisystem is built on. Jul 31, · When: Fox newscast in Fox Business anchor Liz Claman is known for a bit on the risqué side, with necklines and . south western federal taxation chapter 7 solutions South Western Federal Taxation Chapter 7 Solutions South Western Federal Taxation Chapter 7 Solutions *FREE* south western federal taxation chapter 7 solutions South Western Federal Taxation 36th Edition Chegg Unlike static PDF South Western Federal Taxation 36th Edition solution manuals or. May 03, · an exclusive extended interview with Warren Buffett’s kids, FBN’s Liz Claman talks to the billionaire’s about Abigail Disney’s criticism of CEO Robert Iger's $ million. Dec 07, · The Very Hot Liz Claman is off that body of her's in a nice dress off her great legs! Report. Jeffrey Epstein. next. UK Prince Andrew's lawyers hit back over U.S. inquiry into Epstein. World News from Reuters. Jul 10, · LIZ CLAMAN lowcut - "Countdown to the Bell" (May 8, ) - *lowcut* Liz Claman ~ The Daily Show with Jon Stewart 4/1/10 (HDTV) Liz Claman Green Dress Caps. Map Memento Free Dystopias Definition And Characteristics Readwritethink Liz Claman Shirt Rips Open Windowssearch Exp Com 1 / 2. -
Towards Sustainable Investment & Operations: Making Progress
Towards Sustainable Investment & Operations Making Progress 2014 Report Contents A Message from CalPERS Leaders 1 CalPERS Investments — in Numbers 2 Introduction 4 Core Issues 5 Asset Liability Management: Ensuring Financial Sustainability 6 Investment Beliefs 7 Sustainable Investment Research Initiative 9 Cross Asset Class Team on Sustainable Investment 10 Financial Capital 13 Financial Market Reform 13 Engagement Through Global Partners 14 Voting Our Proxy 14 Focus List 15 External Managers and Vehicles 18 CalPERS Putting Principles into Practice 21 Physical Capital 22 Corporate Reporting 22 Carbon Asset Risk Initiative 22 Environmental Investment Initiatives 23 CalPERS Putting Principles into Practice 25 Human Capital 27 Corporate Engagement 27 Board Quality and Diversity 30 Asset Class Initiatives 31 CalPERS Putting Principles into Practice 33 Appendix 1 34 Appendix 2 38 Appendix 3 39 A Message from CalPERS Leaders We are pleased to present our second report on CalPERS sustainability work, Towards Sustainable Investment & Operations. In our first report we highlighted the importance of taking responsibility This report focuses on our progress towards the goals we set Sustainability continues to be at the heart of what we do To bolster our internal expertise and focus we created CalPERS employs a “total fund” approach to sustainable the Cross Asset Class Team on Sustainable Investment investment The first task in implementing this approach This group includes members from all areas of the was to develop principles for sustainable investment -
Agenda Item 5B
Item 5b - Attachment 3, Page 1 of 45 SEMI - ANNUAL PERFORMANCE R EPORT California Public Employees’ Retirement System Private Equity Program Semi-Annual Report – June 30, 2017 MEKETA INVESTMENT GROUP B OSTON C HICAGO M IAMI P ORTLAND S AN D IEGO L ONDON M ASSACHUSETTS I LLINOIS F LORIDA O REGON C ALIFORNIA U N I T E D K INGDOM www.meketagroup.com Item 5b - Attachment 3, Page 2 of 45 California Public Employees’ Retirement System Private Equity Program Table of Contents 1. Introduction and Executive Summary 2. Private Equity Industry Review 3. Portfolio Overview 4. Program Performance 5. Program Activity 6. Appendix Vintage Year Statistics Glossary Prepared by Meketa Investment Group Page 2 of 45 Item 5b - Attachment 3, Page 3 of 45 California Public Employees’ Retirement System Private Equity Program Introduction Overview This report provides a review of CalPERS Private Equity Program as of June 30, 2017, and includes a review and outlook for the Private Equity industry. CalPERS began investing in the private equity asset class in 1990. CalPERS currently has an 8% interim target allocation to the private equity asset class. As of June 30, 2017, CalPERS had 298 investments in the Active Portfolio, and 319 investments in the Exited Portfolio1. The total value of the portfolio was $25.9 billion2, with total exposure (net asset value plus unfunded commitments) of $40.2 billion3. Executive Summary Portfolio The portfolio is diversified by strategy, with Buyouts representing the largest exposure at 66% of total Private Equity. Mega and Large buyout funds represent approximately 57% of CalPERS’ Buyouts exposure. -
Global Gadflies: Applications and Implications of U.S.- Style Corporate Governance Abroad
NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law Volume 17 Number 2 THE SIXTH ANNUAL ERNST C. Article 28 STIEFEL SYMPOSIUM 1997 GLOBAL GADFLIES: APPLICATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF U.S.- STYLE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ABROAD Mary E. Kissane Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/ journal_of_international_and_comparative_law Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Kissane, Mary E. (1997) "GLOBAL GADFLIES: APPLICATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF U.S.-STYLE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ABROAD," NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law: Vol. 17 : No. 2 , Article 28. Available at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/journal_of_international_and_comparative_law/vol17/iss2/ 28 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Journal of International and Comparative Law by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. GLOBAL GADFLIES: APPLICATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF U.S.-STYLE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ABROAD I. INTRODUCTION Over the past decade, international business participants have come to recognize that the structure of corporate governance' is more than a local custom to be accepted by default.2 Rather, such local structures are increasingly recognized as substantive factors affecting the relative desirability of particular markets.3 The Organization for Economic Co- operation and Development (OECD), a major international economic think- tank, has commented, "given the important institutional differences among countries concerning the corporate governance structure, some differences in the cost of capital are likely to persist in the future."4 The cost of capital is, of course, a major factor affecting a given markets' appeal to investors.' Competition to liberalize markets in order to attract foreign investors is the "most important policy trend of the 1990s for international investment."6 However, "the greater freedom this gives 1. -
Filed Complaint for Civil Penalties
CONFOIDv.ffiD COpy OF ORIGn\~AL FILED 1 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. L~ Angeles ~uperior Court Attorney General of the State of California 2 MARK J. BRECKLER (State Bar No. 81577) MAY 0.·5 2010 ~ Senior Assistant Attorney General JobA. Cfark~} };;x:~gl!tive Officer/Cler @1 3 JON M. ICHINAGA (State BarNo. 137290) Supervising Deputy Attorney General ~ ~'_~~~lA;MS~_______ 4 W. RICHARD SINTEK (State Bar No. 134894) ".- '~~~l1mlf?r © Deputy Attorney General 5 XIANCHUN J. VENDLER (State BarNo. 180507) Deputy Attorney General CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE © 6 300 South Spring Street, Suite 1702 AUG 2:1 2010 Los Angeles, CA 90013 7 Telephone: (213) 576-7769 Date Facsimile: (213) 897-2801 8 E-mail: [email protected]. gov John H. Reid ~.\=- 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff The People of the State of California 10 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 11 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 12 13 WEST DISTRICT 14 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CASE NO: 15 CALIFORNIA, SCI07850 16 Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL PENALTIES, s-' ____ ._. __ .___ .________ __________.______ _ANCI~LA_RY RELl¥F'_~~P. ___ . ___________ " ___. ___ ~ 17 INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ALFRED ROBLES VILLALOBOS, 18 ARVCO CAPITAL RESEARCH, LLC, (Cal. Corp. Code §§ 25210, 25216(a), and FEDERICO R. BUENROSTRO JR., and 25403; Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200) 19 DOES 1 - 100, inclusive, Verified Answer Required Pursuant To 20 Defendants. California Code Of Civil Procedure § 446 21 Exempt From Filing Fees Pursuant To Government Code § 6103 22 Plaintiff, the People ofthe State of California ("the People"), by and through Edmund G. 23 Brown Jr., Attorney General of the State of California, allege as follows: 24 INTRODUCTION 25 1. -
PHILIP ANGELIDES Fureneurer Strife Nf Mnlifnrnin
PHILIP ANGELIDES fUreneurer strife nf Mnlifnrnin November 23,2004 Mr. Jonathan G. Katz Secretary U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 450 5thStreet, N. W. Washington, DC 20549-0609 Re: File No. S7-I07041 ~&ulationNMS, Release No. 34-49325 (February 26, 2004) (the -"NMS Relepse") qnd.File No. SR-NYSE-2004-5, Release No. 34-501 73 (August I0, 2004) . , r I s Dear Mr. Katz: As the Treasurer of the State of ~aliforniaand member of the boards of the Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS), I must strongly urge that the Commission postpone action on the proposed "trade-through" rule of Regulation NMS and first seek greater clarification of the NYSE7sproposed "hybrid market" model, in order to ensure that any market reforms will be fair to all investors. Although we fully understand that the stated intent of the "trade-through" rule is to protect the rights of investors, we think the rule, in its present proposed form, actually risks hurting investors, including hard working employees in our CalPERS and CalSTRS systems by limiting the freedom of investors and their fiduciaries to choose how and where their securities trades will be carried out. My office also recently reviewed the NYSE hybrid proposal, and some of the comments thereon. The NYSE proposal lacks substantial critical detail which could give us any substantive understanding of how that model would or could benefit investors and eradicate current market inefficiencies and inequities. On behalf of the State of California, and indeed all investors, I urge the Commission to require the NYSE to provide much greater detail and cantext around the "hybrid" proposal so as to enable us to understand properly and evaluate i% impact. -
Ryan A. Krause
Ryan A. Krause TCU Box 298530 Fort Worth, TX 76129 (817) 257-6051 • [email protected] EDUCATION Kelley School of Business, Indiana University Bloomington, IN Doctor of Philosophy 2013 Bachelor of Science with Highest Distinction 2009 ACADEMIC POSITIONS Full-Time Positions Neeley School of Business, Texas Christian University Fort Worth, TX Robert and Edith Schumacher Junior Faculty Fellow 2017-Present Associate Professor (Tenured) 2017-Present Assistant Professor 2013-2017 Kelley School of Business, Indiana University Bloomington, IN Associate Instructor 2009-2013 Visiting Positions LUISS Business School, LUISS Guido Carli Rome, Italy Visiting Professor 2017-Present University of Zurich Zurich, Switzerland Visiting Professor (Sabbatical) Oct – Dec 2020 Copenhagen Business School Copenhagen, Denmark Visiting Researcher (Sabbatical) Aug – Sep 2020 1 PEER-REVIEWED JOURNAL PUBLICATIONS Whitler, K. A., Lee, B., Krause, R., and Morgan, N. A. Upper echelons research in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences. Forthcoming. Priem, R., Krause, R., McFadyen, A., and Tantalo, C. Promoting long-term shareholder value by “competing” for essential stakeholders: A new, multi-sided platform logic for top managers. Academy of Management Perspectives. Forthcoming. Featured in Academy of Management Insights. Gras, D. and Krause, R. 2020. When does it pay to stand out as stand-up? Competitive contingencies in the CSP-CFP relationship. Strategic Organization, 18(3): 448-471. Semadeni, M. and Krause, R. 2020. Innovation in the Boardroom. Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(2): 240-251. Vaid, S., Ahearne, M., and Krause, R. 2020. Joint marketing and sales appointment: Uncertainty from intertwining of marketing and sales in one position. Industrial Marketing Management, 85: 221-239. -
Case 3:04-Cv-00531-JCH Document 1 Filed 03/31/2004 Page 1 of 48
Case 3:04-cv-00531-JCH Document 1 Filed 03/31/2004 Page 1 of 48 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRUCE SIMONS, on behalf of : himself and all others : Case No. similarly situated, : Plaintiff, : CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT : FOR VIOLATION OF : FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS VS. : : EMCOR GROUP, INC., LEICLE E. : CHESSER, FRANK T. MACINNIS and : MARK POMPA, : : Defendants. : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Plaintiff, by his undersigned attorneys, by way of this Complaint, alleges the following upon personal knowledge as to himself and his acts and as to all other matters upon information and belief, based upon, inter alia, the investigation made by and through his attorneys, including a review of the public filings of EMCOR Group, Inc. (“EMCOR” or “the Company”) with the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”), as well as certain published reports and news articles. PARTIES. 1. Plaintiff, Bruce Simons, as set forth in the attached certification, which is incorporated herein by reference, is a resident of Santa Clara County, California and purchased shares of EMCOR common stock in the open market between April 9, 2003 and October 2, 2003 inclusive (the “Class Period”), and suffered damages as a result of those purchases. 2. Defendant, EMCOR, is a Delaware corporation with its principal executive offices and headquarters located in Norwalk, Connecticut. 3. Defendant, Leicle E. Chesser (“Chesser”), was, at all relevant times, the Executive Case 3:04-cv-00531-JCH Document 1 Filed 03/31/2004 Page 2 of 48 Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) of the Company. 4. Defendant, Frank T. -
2021 Health Benefit Summary Provides Only a General Employee Health Benefits in California, and the Overview of Certain Benefits
2021 | Health Benefit Summary Helping you make an informed decision about your health plan About CalPERS About This Publication CalPERS is the largest purchaser of public The 2021 Health Benefit Summary provides only a general employee health benefits in California, and the overview of certain benefits. It does not include details of second largest public purchaser in the nation all covered expenses or exclusions and limitations. Please after the federal government. Our program refer to each health plan’s Evidence of Coverage (EOC) provides benefits for 1.5 million public booklet for the exact terms and conditions of coverage. employees, retirees, and their families. Health plans mail EOCs to new members at the beginning Depending on where you reside or work, of the year, and to existing members upon request. In case CalPERS offers active employees and retirees of a conflict between this summary and your health plan’s one or more types of health plans, which EOC, the EOC establishes the benefits that will be provided. may include: The 2021 Health Benefit Summary provides valuable infor- • Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) mation to help you make an informed choice about • Preferred Provider Organization (PPO) your health plan and health care providers. This publication • Exclusive Provider Organization (EPO) compares covered services, copayments, and benefits for (for members in certain California counties) each CalPERS health plan. It also provides information about plan availability by county and a chart summarizing The CalPERS Board of Administration annu- important differences among health plan types. ally determines health plan availability, covered You can use this information to determine which health benefits, health premiums, and copayments. -
Service Retirement Election Application This Page Intentionally Left Blank to Facilitate Double-Sided Printing
A Guide to Completing Your CalPERS Service Retirement Election Application This page intentionally left blank to facilitate double-sided printing. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .............................................3 Retirement Planning Resources ...........................4 Key Points to Consider Before You Retire ...................5 Other Considerations .....................................6 If You Become Disabled ..................................6 Power of Attorney ......................................6 Emergency Retirement ..................................6 Divorce, Legal Separation, or Termination of Domestic Partnership ..6 Working After You Retire .................................7 Benefit Forfeiture for Felony Convictions .....................7 How to Complete Your Service Retirement Election Application ......................................8 What Happens Next? .................................. 18 Supporting Documents .................................. 20 Retirement Forms ....................................... 21 Retirement Allowance Estimate Request Form ................. 21 Service Retirement Election Application Form ................. 23 Justification for Absence of Spouse’s or Registered Domestic Partner’s Signature Form ............................. 33 CalPERS Health Benefits ................................. 35 Health Insurance Covered Under PEMHCA ................. 35 Medicare ............................................ 36 Dental Coverage and Vesting Requirements (State and CSU Members Only) ....................... -
Calpers Looks at Social Issues in Emerging Markets - Print Forma
MANY QUESTIONS: CalPERS looks at social issues in emerging markets - Print Forma... Page 1 of 3 MANY QUESTIONS: CalPERS looks P&I REPRINTS This copy is for your at social issues in emerging personal, non- commercial use only. To order markets presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, By Joel Chernoff clients or customers, use the Source: Pensions & Investments Reprints tool or the Reprints & Date: January 10, 2000 Permissions link at the top or bottom of any article, SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- CalPERS is debating how to expand its influence on respectively. labor and human rights practices in emerging markets. View reprint options Order a reprint article A push into these social issues in emerging markets would be a major now initiative for the $161 billion California Public Employees' Retirement System. It would follow on the fund's well-publicized corporate governance efforts in developed markets. In a Dec. 13 workshop addressing in which countries the fund should invest, board members differed as to whether they should take a more active role or stay away from countries that present high levels of political risk because of their policies. No decisions were made at the workshop. At the end of the afternoon, about one-third of the 13 board members said they had not made up their minds. The board directed the staff to come back with recommendations for its April meeting. But the lines of the debate were clearly drawn. William Crist, president of the CalPERS' Board of Administration, said that "ignoring or staying away is not going to make it better.