DOCSLIB.ORG

Whitegate & Marton Neighbourhood Plan – Summary of Publicity Stage Representations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Whitegate & Marton Neighbourhood Plan – Summary of Publicity Stage Representations Whitegate & Marton Neighbourhood Plan – Summary of Publicity Stage Representations All representations including attachments are available to view in full on the Council’s Consultation Portal at: http://consult.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/portal/cwc_ldf/np/whitegate_marton_pub Full Name Company / Comments - Comments on neighbourhood plan Organisation Mr Dewi Dwr Cymru Thank you for the consultation. This area falls outside of Welsh Water’s operational area as such we have no Griffiths Welsh Water comments to make. Mr John Moran Health & Safety Thank you for your request to provide a representation on the above consultation document. When consulted on Executive land-use planning matters, HSE where possible will make representations to ensure that compatible development within the consultation zones of major hazard establishments and major accident hazard pipelines (MAHPs) is achieved. We have concluded that we have no representations to make on this occasion. This is because our records show that the Whitegate and Marton boundary and the land within does not encroach on the consultation zones of major hazard establishments or MAHPs 1. As no encroachment has been detected, HSE does not need to be informed of the next stages in the adoption of the Whitegate and Marton Neighbourhood Plan. 1 Planning authorities are advised to use HSE’s Planning Advice Web App to verify the advice given. The Web App is a software version of the methodology used in providing land use planning advice. It replaces PADHI+. All planning authorities should have an authorised administrator who can access the Web App; further information is available on HSE’s website: http://www.hse.gov.uk/landuseplanning/padhi.htm. HSE also advises that you contact pipeline operators for up-to-date information on pipeline location, as pipelines can be diverted by operators from notified routes. Most incidents involving damage to buried pipelines occur because third parties are not aware of their presence. Mr Spencer National Grid plc National Grid has appointed Amec Foster Wheeler to review and respond to development plan consultations on its Jefferies (comments behalf. We are instructed by our client to submit the following representation with regards to the above submitted by Neighbourhood Plan consultation. Amec Foster About National Grid Wheeler) National Grid owns and operates the high voltage electricity transmission system in England and Wales and operate the Scottish high voltage transmission system. National Grid also owns and operates the gas transmission system. In the UK, gas leaves the transmission system and enters the distribution networks at high pressure. It is then transported through a number of reducing pressure tiers until it is finally delivered to our customers. National Grid own four of the UK’s gas distribution networks and transport gas to 11 million homes, schools and businesses through 81,000 miles of gas pipelines within North West, East of England, West Midlands and North London. Full Name Company / Comments - Comments on neighbourhood plan Organisation To help ensure the continued safe operation of existing sites and equipment and to facilitate future infrastructure investment, National Grid wishes to be involved in the preparation, alteration and review of plans and strategies which may affect our assets. Specific Comments An assessment has been carried out with respect to National Grid’s electricity and gas transmission apparatus which includes high voltage electricity assets and high pressure gas pipelines, and also National Grid Gas Distribution’s Intermediate and High Pressure apparatus. National Grid has identified that it has no record of such apparatus within the Neighbourhood Plan area. Gas Distribution – Low / Medium Pressure Whilst there is no implications for National Grid Gas Distribution’s Intermediate / High Pressure apparatus, there may however be Low Pressure (LP) / Medium Pressure (MP) Gas Distribution pipes present within proposed development sites. If further information is required in relation to the Gas Distribution network please contact [email protected] Key resources / contacts National Grid has provided information in relation to electricity and transmission assets via the following internet link: http://www2.nationalgrid.com/uk/services/land-and-development/planning-authority/shape-files/ The electricity distribution operator in Cheshire West and Chester Borough Council is SP Energy Networks. Information regarding the transmission and distribution network can be found at: www.energynetworks.org.uk Mr Dave I would like to confirm my support for the work done by our local Neighbourhood Plan group in producing a Cotterill document which I believe reflects the aspirations of our community. As a retired planner and village resident for over 50 years, I have deliberately kept out of the detailed work to allow the "grass roots" feelings of the community to feed into this document. However I consider that the NP that is out for consultation is a properly considered document that will serve the community well. It accepts that satisfying local housing need will always be difficult in small settlements that cannot support sustainable development, but it also encourages local businesses to flourish albeit on a small scale. Such things are important to rural communities and our efforts with respect to the community cafe at Whitegate Station is a reflection of this. The NP also sets out those features and characteristics of our area that are important both to this and the wider community. Facilities such as Whitegate Way and the local footpath/bridleway network are well used by visitors from well beyond our parish boundaries. Small scale tourism will continue to be important and valuable to the community and the NP objectives with regard to improving and developing new facilities and infrastructure are to be supported. Full Name Company / Comments - Comments on neighbourhood plan Organisation Ms Clare Olver The Mersey The Mersey Forest response To Whitegate and Marton Neighbourhood Plan Forest Whitegate and Marton are located within The Mersey Forest. The Mersey Forest is a community forest established in 1991 with the vision to “get more from trees” to help make Merseyside and North Cheshire one of the best places in the country to live. The Forest works with partners, communities and landowners across rural and urban areas, to plant trees and woodlands, improve their management and complement other habitats. This will increase woodland cover to 20% of the area. It will revitalise a woodland culture, and bring economic and social benefits through the transformed environment. The Mersey Forest Plan is a long term and strategic guide to the work of the Forest and its partners. It is recognised in the National Planning Policy Framework as a material consideration in preparing development plans and deciding planning applications: http://www.merseyforest.org.uk/The_Mersey_Forest_Plan_web_version_single_new.pdf It is recommended that the Neighbourhood Plan makes reference to the Mersey Forest Plan and makes consideration of these following policies: C15. Delamere Forest, Sandy Woods, and Sandstone Ridge : Expand the well-wooded landscape around Delamere Forest, along the Sandstone Ridge and long distance trail, and on steeper slopes. It is inappropriate to plant on the sandstone escarpment ridge line. Extend and plant medium to large woodlands from Oakmere to Little Budworth. Take into account internationally significant meres and mosses in the area, along with other non- woodland habitats. Maintain and restore hedgerows, hedgerow trees, and orchards, and create heathland and meadows, including following quarry restoration. Retain water bodies. C16. Weaver Valley: Extend the wooded nature by planting on the valley shoulders, sides and, where appropriate, floor, buffering and connecting ancient semi-natural woodland. Ensure planting does not block the line of the valley floor. Manage existing woodlands with special regard to ancient semi-natural woodlands. C19. Rolling farmland from Tarporley to Winsford : Create small copses and restore and plant hedgerows and hedgerow trees. Do not restrict long distance views to Lowland Plain, Weaver Valley, Peak District and the Peckforton Hills. In reviewing the Neighbourhood Plan, please note comments re. 4.3.2 where we have worked with the Friends of Church Wood for many years. Full Name Company / Comments - Comments on neighbourhood plan Organisation 4.3.2 Protection and enhancement of the Natural Environment Since 1998, The Mersey Forest has supported a network of Friends of Woodlands groups which anyone can join ( http://www.merseyforest.org.uk/things-to-do/join-a-community-group/ ).These groups, such as the Friends of Church Wood, help manage their local woodlands and our aim is to assist them in becoming increasingly self-sufficient, whilst recognising that longer term support is also required. Depending on the group, we help with a range of activities, from setting up and managing the group, creating woodland management plans, and accessing funds for specific projects and events, such as practical task days, and courses and workshops to learn new skills. Engaging people through trees and woodlands can help to bring communities together, making them more resilient and cohesive, and acting as a springboard for engagement on a wider range of issues. Ms Rebecca United Utilities Thank you for your email and links to the draft neighbourhood plan. Pemberton You may be aware
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Youth Arts Audit: West Cheshire and Chester: Including Districts of Chester, Ellesmere Port and Neston and Vale Royal 2008
    YOUTH ARTS AUDIT: WEST CHESHIRE AND CHESTER: INCLUDING DISTRICTS OF CHESTER, ELLESMERE PORT AND NESTON AND VALE ROYAL 2008 This project is part of a wider pan Cheshire audit of youth arts supported by Arts Council England-North West and Cheshire County Council Angela Chappell; Strategic Development Officer (Arts & Young People) Chester Performs; 55-57 Watergate Row South, Chester, CH1 2LE Email: [email protected] Tel: 01244 409113 Fax: 01244 401697 Website: www.chesterperforms.com 1 YOUTH ARTS AUDIT: WEST CHESHIRE AND CHESTER JANUARY-SUMMER 2008 CONTENTS PAGES 1 - 2. FOREWORD PAGES 3 – 4. WEST CHESHIRE AND CHESTER PAGES 3 - 18. CHESTER PAGES 19 – 33. ELLESMERE PORT & NESTON PAGES 34 – 55. VALE ROYAL INTRODUCTION 2 This document details Youth arts activity and organisations in West Cheshire and Chester is presented in this document on a district-by-district basis. This project is part of a wider pan Cheshire audit of youth arts including; a separate document also for East Cheshire, a sub-regional and county wide audit in Cheshire as well as a report analysis recommendations for youth arts for the future. This also precedes the new structure of Cheshire’s two county unitary authorities following LGR into East and West Cheshire and Chester, which will come into being in April 2009 An audit of this kind will never be fully accurate, comprehensive and up-to-date. Some data will be out-of-date or incorrect as soon as it’s printed or written, and we apologise for any errors or omissions. The youth arts audit aims to produce a snapshot of the activity that takes place in West Cheshire provided by the many arts, culture and youth organisations based in the county in the spring and summer of 2008– we hope it is a fair and balanced picture, giving a reasonable impression of the scale and scope of youth arts activities, organisations and opportunities – but it is not entirely exhaustive and does not claim to be.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 14/07/2010, 14:00
    Public Document Pack Strategic Planning Board Agenda Date: Wednesday, 14th July, 2010 Time: 2.00 pm Venue: The Capesthorne Room - Town Hall, Macclesfield SK10 1DX The agenda is divided into 2 parts. Part 1 is taken in the presence of the public and press. Part 2 items will be considered in the absence of the public and press for the reasons indicated on the agenda and at the foot of each report. Please note that members of the public are requested to check the Council's website the week the Strategic Planning Board meeting is due to take place as Officers produce updates for some or for all of the applications prior to the commencement of the meeting and after the agenda has been published. PART 1 – MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED WITH THE PUBLIC AND PRESS PRESENT 1. Apologies for Absence To receive any apologies for absence 2. Declarations of Interest/Pre-Determination To provide an opportunity for Members and Officers to declare any personal and/or prejudicial interests and for Members to declare if they have made a pre- determination in respect of any item on the agenda 3. Minutes of the Previous Meeting (Pages 1 - 4) To approve the minutes of the meeting held on 23 June 2010 4. Public Speaking A total period of 5 minutes is allocated for each of the planning application for Ward Councillors who are not members of the Strategic Planning Board. A period of 3 minutes is allocated for the each of the planning application for the following individuals/groups: For any apologies or requests for further information, or to arrange to speak at the meeting Contact : Sarah Baxter Tel: 01270 686462 E-Mail: [email protected] • Members who are not members of the Strategic Planning Board and are not the Ward Member • The relevant Town/Parish Council • Local Representative Group/Civic Society • Objectors • Supporters • Applicants 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheshire West and Chester Council
    CHESHIRE WEST AND CHESTER COUNCIL DELEGATED REPORT DATE: 16 April 2013 NEIGHBOURHOOD APPLICATION AREA: Whitegate and Marton Regulation No. 5 of the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 DATE APPLICATION FIRST PUBLICISED: 6th February 2013 AREA NAME: Whitegate and Marton APPLICANT NAME: Whitegate and Marton Parish Council WARD: Winsford Over and Verdin Ward WARD MEMBERS: Councillor Don Beckett, Councillor Tom Blackmore, Councillor Lynda Jones CASE OFFICER: Joy Gill RECOMMENDATION: Approve 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This delegated report relates to the assessment of the application for the designation of the Whitegate and Marton Neighbourhood Area. 1.2 The application for the designation of Whitegate and Marton Neighbourhood was publicised on 6th February 2013. The application was made under Part 2 of Regulation 5 of the Town and Country Planning Act. It complied with the requirements of the regulations as it included: a map identifying the area to which the area application relates; a statement explaining why the area is considered appropriate to be designated as a Neighbourhood Plan Area; and a statement that the organisation making the area application is a relevant body for the purposes of section 61G of the 1990 Act. 2 AREA DESCRIPTION 2.1 The proposed Whitegate and Marton Neighbourhood Area is the area covered by Whitegate and Marton Parish Council and follows the same boundary. The overall settlement pattern is one of rural spaciousness and small settlements. It includes the settlements of Whitegate and Marton including a number of small hamlets such as Nova Scotia, Marton Sands, Marton Green and Foxwist Green. The area is located within the wider Winsford Over and Verdin Ward.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheshire West Labour
    Submission to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England on Warding Arrangements for Cheshire West and Chester Council June 2017 Cheshire West Labour 1. Introduction 1.1 As part of the review being undertaken by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England (“the Commission”) into both Council Size and Warding Arrangements within Cheshire West and Chester Council (“the Council”) the Commission has determined, in a letter to the Chief Executive of the Council dated 28th March 2017 to recommend that the number of elected Members should be reduced to 69. 1.2 The Commission published this recommendation following a consultation process. 1.3 This recommendation provides for a Councillor to electorate ration of 1 : 4085 1.4 The next phase of this Review is to determine a pattern of Warding Arrangements. 1.5 This submission is made by Cheshire West Labour comprising the Cheshire West and Chester Labour Group and the Chester West and Chester Local Campaign Forum as part of that determination process. 1.6 This document should be considered alongside the Council Size submission made by Cheshire West Labour in May 2017. 1.7 The intention of this submission is to assist the Commission in reaching its determination on the pattern of Warding Arrangements and the following statutory criteria has been adopted and considered throughout: Delivering electoral equality for local voters. We have sought to ensure that each local councillor represents roughly the same number of people. This provides for a system where every person’s vote achieves the same value. In the context of this submission, as mentioned above, we are seeking to establish an elected member to electorate ratio of 1 : 4085.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheshire West and Chester Borough Council
    Cheshire West and Chester Borough Council Officer Delegated Report Application Number 4/48 Description Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 – Section 53 Application for a Definitive Map Modification Order to add a Byway Open to All Traffic between Whitegate and Winsford and known as “Grange Lane” Location Between Mill Lane, Whitegate and Grange Lane, Winsford and shown between points A & B on Drawing No MO562. Applicant Name Mr D Worthington, Nixon Drive, Winsford Ward Winsford Over and Verdin Ward Members Councillors Michael Baynham, Don Beckett and Tom Blackmore Case Officer Adele Mayer, Public Rights of Way Officer 01606 271822 Date 9 October 2017 Recommendation:- (1) That the application to modify the Definitive Map and Statement with the addition of Byway Open to All Traffic be refused but that an Order be made under section 53(2) of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 to modify the Definitive Map and Statement by the addition of a Restricted Byway as shown between Points A-B on drawing No. MO/562 and that the requisite notice of the making of an Order be given. (2) That the Highways Commisioner be authorised to take any action considered necessary in respect of the confirmation of the Order hereby authorised to be made. 1 Background 1. On 17 November 2011 an application was registered that had been submitted by Mr D Worthington under section 53(5) of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (the “1981 Act”). The application requested that the Council as Surveying Authority make an Order, a Definitive Map Modification Order (DMMO) to add a Byway Open to All Traffic (“BOAT”) to the Definitive Map and Statement of Public Rights of Way (the “DM”) shown on Plan MO/562 (“the plan”) by a brown line between points A and B.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Monitoring Report
    Annual Monitoring Report December 2012 This page has intentionally been left blank Cheshire West and Chester Council Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Spatial portrait 9 3 The Local Development Scheme 14 4 Business development services and town centres 18 5 Housing 26 6 Environmental quality 37 Annual Monitoring Report 2012 7 Transport and accessibility 46 8 Minerals 49 9 Waste 51 Appendices A Glossary of terms 55 B Significant effects indicators 59 C Local Plan evidence base 64 D Employment land supply 68 E Housing 74 1 Introduction 2 Cheshire West and Chester Council 1 Introduction Planning and the Local Development Framework 1.1 This report covers the period 1 April 2011 to 31 March 2012 and is the fourth Annual Monitoring Report (AMR) for Cheshire West and Chester Council, published to comply with the requirements of Section 35 of The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (as amended by the Localism Act 2011) which requires local planning authorities to produce a report containing information in relation to the following: implementation of the Local Development Scheme (LDS) Annual Monitoring Report 2012 extent to which the policies set out in the Local Development Documents are being achieved. 1.2 It was previously a requirement for local planning authorities to submit their AMR to the Secretary of State. The Localism Act has removed this part of the legislation, but still requires the report to be made available to the public. The AMR also forms part of the evidence base to be used to inform the preparation of future planning documents, including the emerging Local Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Parishes in Cheshire West & Chester
    Parishes in Cheshire West & Chester WhitleyWhitley CPCP AntrobusAntrobus CPCP SuttonSutton CPCP DuttonDutton CPCP AstonAston CPCP FrodshamFrodsham CPCP GreatGreat BudworthBudworth CPCP NestonNeston CPCP NestonNeston CPCP ComberbachComberbach CPCP InceInceInce CPCPCP MarstonMarston CPCP LittleLittle LeighLeigh CPCP HelsbyHelsby CPCP AndertonAnderton withwith MarburyMarbury CPCP LedshamLedsham CPCP ActonActon BridgeBridge CPCP KingsleyKingsley CPCP WinchamWincham CPCP EltonElton CPCP BarntonBarnton CPCP Thornton-le-MoorsThornton-le-Moors CPCP HapsfordHapsford CPCP NetherNether PeoverPeover CPCP AlvanleyAlvanley CPCP CapenhurstCapenhurst CPCP LittleLittle StanneyStanney CPCP AlvanleyAlvanley CPCP CrowtonCrowton CPCP PuddingtonPuddington CPCPCapenhurstCapenhurst CPCP LittleLittle StanneyStanney CPCP CrowtonCrowton CPCP StokeStoke CPCP Dunham-on-the-HillDunham-on-the-Hill CPCP LostockLostock GralamGralam CPCP ShotwickShotwick CPCP Chorlton-by-BackfordChorlton-by-Backford CPCP NorleyNorley CPCP WeaverhamWeaverham CPCP WimboldsWimbolds TraffordTrafford CPCP NorleyNorley CPCP NorthwichNorthwich CPCP CroughtonCroughton CPCP ManleyManley CPCP WoodbankWoodbank CPCP CroughtonCroughton CPCP Lea-by-BackfordLea-by-Backford CPCP WervinWervin CPCP HartfordHartford CPCP LachLach DennisDennis CPCP BridgeBridge TraffordTrafford CPCP CuddingtonCuddington CPCP BackfordBackford CPCP BridgeBridge TraffordTrafford CPCP RudheathRudheath CPCP MollingtonMollington CPCP PictonPicton CPCP AllostockAllostock CPCP ShotwickShotwick ParkPark CPCP MouldsworthMouldsworth
    [Show full text]
  • 2020/21 Council Tax All Bands by Area (Including Major Preceptors) Appendix E
    2020/21 COUNCIL TAX ALL BANDS BY AREA (INCLUDING MAJOR PRECEPTORS) APPENDIX E Band A Band B Band C Band D Band E Band F Band G Band H Acton Bridge 1,259.63 1,469.58 1,679.51 1,889.45 2,309.32 2,729.20 3,149.08 3,778.90 Agden 1,248.03 1,456.05 1,664.05 1,872.05 2,288.05 2,704.07 3,120.08 3,744.10 Aldford and Saighton (Chester) 1,258.97 1,468.80 1,678.63 1,888.45 2,308.10 2,727.75 3,147.42 3,776.90 Aldford and Saighton (Eddisbury) 1,257.16 1,466.70 1,676.22 1,885.74 2,304.78 2,723.84 3,142.90 3,771.48 Allostock 1,262.22 1,472.60 1,682.97 1,893.34 2,314.08 2,734.82 3,155.56 3,786.68 Alvanley 1,261.55 1,471.82 1,682.08 1,892.33 2,312.84 2,733.37 3,153.88 3,784.66 Anderton with Marbury 1,262.56 1,473.00 1,683.43 1,893.85 2,314.70 2,735.56 3,156.41 3,787.70 Antrobus 1,264.37 1,475.12 1,685.84 1,896.57 2,318.02 2,739.49 3,160.94 3,793.14 Ashton Hayes and Horton-cum-Peel 1,271.86 1,483.86 1,695.83 1,907.80 2,331.74 2,755.71 3,179.66 3,815.60 Aston 1,253.19 1,462.08 1,670.94 1,879.80 2,297.52 2,715.27 3,132.99 3,759.60 Backford 1,266.02 1,477.03 1,688.03 1,899.03 2,321.03 2,743.04 3,165.05 3,798.06 Barnton 1,283.64 1,497.59 1,711.53 1,925.47 2,353.35 2,781.24 3,209.11 3,850.94 Barrow 1,280.17 1,493.55 1,706.90 1,920.26 2,346.97 2,773.71 3,200.43 3,840.52 Beeston 1,272.78 1,484.92 1,697.05 1,909.17 2,333.42 2,757.69 3,181.95 3,818.34 Bostock 1,261.15 1,471.35 1,681.54 1,891.73 2,312.11 2,732.50 3,152.88 3,783.46 Broxton and District 1,261.96 1,472.30 1,682.62 1,892.94 2,313.58 2,734.24 3,154.90 3,785.88 Burwardsley 1,271.02 1,482.87 1,694.70 1,906.53
    [Show full text]
  • Starting Primary School in September 2019
    informationImportant for parents or carers Cheshire West & Chester Council Starting Primary School in September 2019 Closing date for reception applications 15 January 2019 Visit: www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/admissions Timeline for applying for a reception school place for September 2019 1 September 2018 Parents/carers can apply for a school place Online Paper www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/ Application Form is contained admissions in Section 5 of this booklet 15 January 2019 Closing date for on time applications • Paper applications to be returned to: School Admissions, Cheshire West and Chester Council, Wyvern House, The Drumber, Winsford, Cheshire, CW7 1AH. Paper applications must be received by this date to be considered as ‘on time’ • Online applications must be submitted to the Authority by this date. 22 February 2019 Deadline for supporting information • Any information received by this date will be considered for the initial allocation of school places, for example, change of address, change in circumstances, reasons for the local authority to consider a late application/change of preference as on time • Any information received after this date cannot be included in the initial allocation of school places, however will be considered later in the process following the 16 April 2019 16 April 2019 Notification of offers • Offer letters notifying parent/carers of school place offered sent out by post to parents/ carers who have applied using a paper application. • Online offers made available for parents/carers to view, emails sent to parents/carers who have applied online notifying of the school place offered. 17 May 2019 Closing date for on time appeals Appeals received by this date will be heard by 19 July 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Cheshire Safer Annual Action Plan for 2018/19 (IRMP 15) Report on Public, Staff and Partner Consultation February 2018
    Making Cheshire Safer Annual Action Plan for 2018/19 (IRMP 15) Report on public, staff and partner consultation February 2018 Draft Annual Action Plan 2018/19 (IRMP 15) Consultation Report Page 1 of 147 Contents Page 1. Introduction 3 2. Executive summary 4 3. The programme of consultation 8 4. Consulting with the public 10 5. Consulting with staff and internal stakeholders 14 6. Consulting with stakeholders 16 7. Feedback, evaluation and communicating outcomes 19 8. Detailed results 21 9. Profile of respondents 31 Appendices Appendix 1: Social media and press release 43 Appendix 2: Summary, survey and Firelink newsletter 47 Appendix 3: Partners and stakeholders communicated with 50 Appendix 4: Additional public responses 53 Appendix 5: Public comments 58 Appendix 6: Staff comments 115 Appendix 7: Responses from partners and stakeholders 130 Draft Annual Action Plan 2018/19 (IRMP 15) Consultation Report Page 2 of 147 1. Introduction This report sets out the results of the programme of public, staff and partner consultation on Cheshire Fire Authority’s draft annual action plan for 2018/19 (IRMP 15), titled Making Cheshire Safer, between October 2nd 2017 and January 2nd 2018. The purpose of this report is to enable the Authority to understand the differing level of opinion among all groups to the proposals set out in the draft plan, in order to assist the Authority in giving consideration to the results of the consultation in its decision making process. This feedback will be among the issues considered by the Fire Authority prior to approval of the final version of the annual action plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Vale Royal in Cheshire
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE FUTURE ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR VALE ROYAL IN CHESHIRE Report to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions March 1998 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND This report sets out the Commission’s final recommendations on the electoral arrangements for Vale Royal in Cheshire. Members of the Commission are: Professor Malcolm Grant (Chairman) Helena Shovelton (Deputy Chairman) Peter Brokenshire Professor Michael Clarke Robin Gray Bob Scruton David Thomas OBE Mike Bailey (Acting Chief Executive) ©Crown Copyright 1998 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Local Government Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. ii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page LETTER TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE v SUMMARY vii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 3 3 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 7 4 RESPONSES TO CONSULTATION 9 5 ANALYSIS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 11 6 NEXT STEPS 27 APPENDICES A Final Recommendations for Vale Royal: Detailed Mapping 29 B Draft Recommendations for Vale Royal (November 1997) 39 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND iii iv LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Local Government Commission for England 31 March 1998 Dear Secretary of State On 3 June 1997, the Commission began a periodic electoral review of the borough of Vale Royal under the Local Government Act 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • EXTRACT from the CUDDINGTON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN the Policies Environment and Landscape Policy 1 - Landscape Setting
    EXTRACT FROM THE CUDDINGTON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN The Policies Environment and Landscape Policy 1 - Landscape Setting Development should respect and wherever possible enhance the landscape setting of Cuddington Parish. Development schemes that could impact on the landscape setting must demonstrate how they have respected and reinforced historic landscapes including plots and field patterns. Developers should have regard to the design principles, within the Cuddington Parish Character Assessment *. Applications, which lead to the fragmentation or loss of important landscape features, will be resisted. Wherever possible new developments should be focused on previously developed and appropriate infill sites within the Key Service Centre. Policy 2 - Local Heritage Assets Development needs to take account of its impact on heritage assets – both designated and non- designated and historic landscapes – with the degree of protection afforded reflecting the position of that heritage asset in the hierarchy. Development should demonstrate how it has preserved or enhanced these heritage assets through carefully designed schemes. These must be of a high quality design, incorporating local materials and detailing, and complement the surrounding built character. Proposals must relate closely to the form, scale and style in the immediate vicinity of the site, and should fully consider the impact on the significance and setting of surrounding heritage assets, both designated and non-designated. Applicants should refer to the lists of designated and non-designated Historical Buildings and Landscapes, which are contained in Appendices K and L of the Cuddington Parish Character Assessment. Where relevant, planning applications should demonstrate how they would preserve or enhance these assets. Alterations and extensions to existing buildings must be carefully designed and implemented to ensure that the character of the building, and its contribution to the character of the wider area, is not harmed and that its impact on significant heritage assets and their setting is minimised.
    [Show full text]