DOCSLIB.ORG

This Report Is Not a Final Order of Discipline* District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility Ad Ho

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THIS REPORT IS NOT A FINAL ORDER OF DISCIPLINE* DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AD HOC HEARING COMMITTEE July 24, 2019 In the Matter of: : : LARRY E. KLAYMAN, : : Board Docket No.17-BD-063 Respondent. : Bar Docket No. 2011-D028 : A Member of the Bar of the : District of Columbia Court of Appeals : (Bar Registration No. 334581) : * Consult the ‘Disciplinary Decisions’ tab on the Board on Professional Responsibility’s website (www.dcattorneydiscipline.org) to view any subsequent decisions in this case. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ...................................................................... 2 II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY....................................................................................... 2 III. FINDINGS OF FACT ................................................................................................ 4 A. BACKGROUND OF THE REPRESENTATION .......................................................... 4 B. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP -- JANUARY 2010...................................................................................................................... 8 C. INITIAL STEPS AND DEVELOPMENTS IN THE REPRESENTATION -- FEBRUARY- MARCH 2010 ...................................................................................................... 11 D. DEVELOPMENTS DURING APRIL AND MAY 2010 ............................................. 18 E. DEVELOPMENTS DURING JUNE AND JULY 2010 ............................................... 41 F. DENOUEMENT: AUGUST 2010 – JANUARY 2011 ............................................... 54 IV. RECOMMENDED CONCLUSIONS OF LAW .................................................... 64 A. THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CHARGE ............................................................. 64 B. THE CLIENT DECISIONS AND LAWYER-CLIENT CONSULTATION CHARGES .. 92 1. The July 26, 2010 Motion to Disqualify ....................................... 95 2. Respondent’s Steps in the BBG Action ...................................... 101 3. The World Net Daily Articles ....................................................... 104 C. THE FEE ARRANGEMENT CHARGES ............................................................... 115 D. THE REPRESENTATION TERMINATION CHARGE ........................................... 118 E. THE CONFIDENTIALITY CHARGES RELATED TO THE WND ARTICLES ........ 122 F. THE DISHONESTY CHARGE ARISING OUT OF THE DECEMBER 25, 2010 WND ARTICLE .......................................................................................................... 129 V. RECOMMENDATION AS TO SANCTION ....................................................... 134 A. THE FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED ................................................................. 134 B. ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................... 135 i 1. Seriousness of the Misconduct .................................................... 135 2. Misrepresentation or Dishonesty ................................................ 136 3. Respondent’s Attitude Toward the Underlying Misconduct ... 136 4. Prior Discipline ............................................................................. 141 5. Mitigating and Aggravating Circumstances ............................. 142 6. Number of Violations ................................................................... 145 7. Prejudice to the Client ................................................................. 146 C. RECOMMENDED SANCTION ............................................................................. 149 1. The Appropriate Sanction for Respondent’s Rule Violations . 149 2. Whether There is a Need for a Fitness Requirement ............... 161 a. The Court of Appeals’ Guidance ............................................. 162 b. Analysis of the Roundtree Factors ........................................... 165 (i) The nature and circumstances of the misconduct for which Respondent was disciplined. .................................. 165 (ii) Whether Respondent recognizes the seriousness of the misconduct. ........................................................................ 165 (iii) Respondent’s conduct since discipline was imposed, including the steps taken to remedy past wrongs and prevent future ones.. .......................................................... 166 (iv) Respondent’s present character.……………………….166 (v) Respondent’s present qualifications and competence to practice law.. ...................................................................... 166 (a) Respondent’s litigation tactics. ................................... 167 (b) Respondent’s vexatious pleadings.. ............................ 169 (c) Respondent’s abusive delaying tactics. ....................... 175 (d) Respondent’s disingenuous pleadings. ....................... 180 c. Recommendation as to Imposition of Fitness Requirement. ... 182 VI. CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................... 182 ii REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE AD HOC HEARING COMMITTEE I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY Respondent Larry E. Klayman is charged in a four-count Specification of Charges with multiple violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct for the District of Columbia (Rules) -- specifically Rules 1.2(a), 1.4(b), 1.5(b), 1.5(c), 1.6(a)(1), 1.6(a)(3), 1.7(b)(4), 1.16(a)(3), and 8.4(c). This disciplinary matter arises out of Respondent’s representation of a client in 2010 and perhaps for a few weeks before and after 2010. As fully discussed hereinafter, the Hearing Committee unanimously recommends that the Board conclude that Disciplinary Counsel has established by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated one or more of Rules 1.2(a), 1.4(b), 1.5(b), 1.5(c), 1.6(a)(1), 1.6(a)(3), 1.7(b)(4), and 1.16(a)(3) in a total of at least fourteen instances or sets of circumstances.1 The Hearing Committee also recommends that Respondent be suspended from the practice of law under the aegis of the District of Columbia Bar for a period of 33 months and that his readmission to the Bar be conditioned upon his establishing that he has been rehabilitated and is fit to resume the practice of law. II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Disciplinary Counsel filed its Specification of Charges (Sp. Ch.) on July 20, 2017, and it was served on Respondent on September 29, 2017. Respondent filed his 1 We also recommend that the Board find that Disciplinary Counsel has not proven by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated Rule 8.4(c). 2 Answer on December 8, 2017. Opening statements and Disciplinary Counsel’s evidence were heard on May 30 and 31 and June 1, 2018. Respondent’s case was presented on June 25, 26, and 27. Closing arguments for Disciplinary Counsel and Respondent were presented on June 27. The members of the Ad Hoc Hearing Committee were Warren Anthony Fitch, Esquire, Chair; Mary C. Larkin, Public Member; and Michael E. Tigar, Esquire, Attorney Member. Assistant Disciplinary Counsel H. Clay Smith, III, Esquire, appeared on behalf of Disciplinary Counsel; Frederick J. Sujat, Esquire, appeared on behalf of Respondent, who nevertheless assumed the major litigation responsibilities during the hearing. Disciplinary Counsel submitted Exhibits (DX) A-D, 1-54,2 and Supplemental Exhibits (SX) 1-38 -- all were admitted into evidence. Tr. 276-79, 315, 320, 842, 1417-20, 1617-18; HC Order July 11, 2018 (admitting Disciplinary Counsel’s Exhibit 54 into evidence). Respondent submitted Exhibits (RX) 1-30, Supplemental Exhibits (RSX) 1-6, and a pleading filed earlier in the case3 -- all were admitted as well. Tr. 621-23, 1263. Disciplinary Counsel filed its Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation as to Sanction on August 24, 2018. Respondent filed his on October 30, 2018. Disciplinary Counsel filed its Reply on November 13, 2018. Respondent filed his Surreply on November 20, 2018. 2 During the Hearing on June 27, Disciplinary Counsel marked for identification Respondent’s prior discipline in Florida as Exhibit 53. We hereby admit this into evidence but it is relevant only to our Sanction analysis. 3 The pleading is titled “Supplemental Response of Disciplinary Counsel to Respondent’s Motion for Modest Continuance and to Reschedule Hearing” (RS) and was filed on May 14, 2018. 3 III. FINDINGS OF FACT A. BACKGROUND OF THE REPRESENTATION 1. Ms. Elham Sataki, the client in the matter giving rise to this disciplinary proceeding, was born and raised in Iran, where she lived for approximately 12 years. Tr. 69.4 She and her family moved to Sweden after the 1979 Iranian revolution and she later graduated from the University of Stockholm with a degree in psychology. Tr. 69-70. Ms. Sataki subsequently moved to the United States and trained in cosmetology in Texas. Tr. 71. 2. Ms. Sataki moved in approximately 2001 to Los Angeles, where she lived for approximately six years and worked both in cosmetology and as an anchor or co-host on news and politics programs on an Iranian-oriented network and another network. Tr. 70-72. 3. By letter dated October 16, 2007 (by which time she had moved to Arlington, VA and done some broadcasting work for the Voice of America (VOA)), Ms. Sataki applied for the position of International Broadcaster (Persian) at the International Broadcasting Bureau (IBB) of VOA. RX 901-07.5 Ms. Sataki received 4 “Tr.” refers to the six-volume, consecutively paginated transcript of the evidentiary hearing in
Recommended publications
  • In United States District Court for the District of Columbia

    In United States District Court for the District of Columbia

    Case 1:13-cv-00851-RJL Document 13-1 Filed 10/29/13 Page 1 of 31 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LARRY KLAYMAN, et. al Plaintiffs, v. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II, et. al Defendants. Civil Action No. 13-CV-851 PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION I. INTRODUCTION On June 9, 2013, Plaintiffs filed suit challenging the legality of Defendants’ secret and illicit government scheme to systematically gather, intercept and analyze vast quantities of domestic telephonic communications and “metadata” wholly within the United States by implementing a highly classified, unlawful mass call tracking surveillance program. Compl. ¶2. On April 25, 2013, Defendant Honorable Roger Vinson, a judge of the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (“FISC”), issued a top-secret order compelling the disclosure of all call detail records in possession of Verizon Telecommunication for analysis by the National Security Agency (“NSA”) on an ongoing daily basis.1 On June 5, 2013, based on the disclosures of whistleblower, Edward Snowden, who fled the United States for fear of government reprisal, The Guardian publicly revealed this previously classified order in an article entitled “NSA collecting phone records of millions of Verizon customers daily. Exclusive: Top secret order 1 Compl. ¶26; See, In re Application of the FBI for an Order Requiring the Production of Tangible Things from Verizon Bus. Network Servs., Inc. on Behalf of MCI Commc’n Servs., Inc. d/b/a Verizon Bus. Servs., No. BR 13-80 (FISA Ct. Apr. 25, 2013) (“Verizon Order”).
  • Allred, Gloria 3.4.19 Final Press Release

    Allred, Gloria 3.4.19 Final Press Release

    ! For Immediate Release: March 8, 2019 Media Contacts: Sujatha Ramanujan, Induction Chair Sandy Sloane, Events Consultant [email protected] [email protected] 585-230-1812 954-707-2652 National Women’s Hall of Fame Induction Sept. 14, 2019 Gloria Allred, attorney and activist to be included Seneca Falls, NY: - In celebration of the 100th year anniversary of Women’s Right to Vote in NY, The National Women's Hall of Fame will host a weekend celebrating the achievements of American Women in the birthplace of the Women’s Rights movement in the U.S. The highlight of the weekend is the induction of ten women into the Hall of Fame for their historic achievements. "We are pleased to add these American women to the ranks of inductees whose leadership and achievements have changed the course of American history," said Betty Bayer, Ph. D., the Hall's President. The National Women's Hall of Fame will celebrate the inclusion of these extraordinary women into the ranks of the inductees at the biennial induction ceremony on September 14, 2019 at the magnificent del Lago Resort & Casino, located outside of Seneca Falls, NY. The 2019 class of inductees were nominated by the public, judged by an interdisciplinary team of experts across the nominees’ fields, and selected for their invaluable contributions to American Society in the areas of the arts, athletics, business, education, government, humanities, philanthropy, and science. Gloria Allred: (1941- ) Gloria Allred is a founding partner of the law firm of Allred, Maroko & Goldberg (AM&G). Across her 42-year legal career, her firm has handled more women’s rights cases than any other private law firm in the nation and has won hundreds of millions of dollars for victims.
  • Scwla Reg Broch 2018 V2.Indd

    Scwla Reg Broch 2018 V2.Indd

    Greetings, It is with great pleasure that I cordially invite you (and your family!) to join the South Carolina Women Lawyers’ Association (“SCWLA”) in Hilton Head, South Carolina on October 19 – 21, 2018 for our Annual Conference to celebrate SCWLA’s 25th Anniversary! We are thrilled to celebrate our organization’s 25th year and are pleased to offer dynamic pro- graming under our theme, “Engagement and Empowerment.” Our keynote speaker is Gloria Allred, an attorney known for fighting on the front lines of women’s rights and victims’ rights for over four decades (see the trailer for her documentary on Netflix here: https://www.youtube.com/embed/SC8Eg0odTfY). Other featured speakers include Deb Sofield, acclaimed speaker, author and coach; and Toni Messina, a renowned criminal defense attorney. We are also excited about a presentation on the ABA’s Commission on Women in the Profession’s “Grit” Project, which educates women lawyers about the science behind grit and growth mindset - two important traits that many successful women lawyers have in common. Other programing will include presentations on legal marketing, the federal rules and red wine (yes, you read that right!), and how #metoo is impacting the profession. I’m also excited to share that this year, we have structured the scheduling of the CLEs a bit differently than in the past. We are cognizant of the great time (and expense) that attending the conference entails, so we have designed the pro- gram to both maximize your CLE offerings and allow you time to enjoy what Hilton Head has to offer with your signifi- cant other or your family at a reasonable price.
  • Nasty Women and the Rule of Law

    Nasty Women and the Rule of Law

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of San Francisco Nasty Women and the Rule of Law By ALICE WOOLLEY and ELYSA DARLING* “Such a nasty woman.”1 “There’s just something about her that feels castrating, overbear- ing, and scary.”2 “She undoubtedly suffered in the trial . but she was not likable.”3 “Marie Henein is a successful female lawyer at the top of her pro- fession. Total bitch.”4 “Not a feminist.”5 Introduction NO ONE ENTERS THE LEGAL PROFESSION expecting social pop- ularity—or, at least, no one should.6 But recent events create the im- * Alice Woolley is Professor of Law at the Faculty of Law, University of Calgary, and President of the International Association of Legal Ethics. Elysa Darling graduated from the University of Calgary in 2016, and currently practices law in Calgary. The authors would like to thank Amy Salyzyn and Alex Darling for their helpful comments and feedback, and Joshua Davis and the University of San Francisco School of Law for including this paper in the 2017 Workshop on Jurisprudence and Legal Ethics. 1. Daniella Diaz, Trump calls Clinton ‘a nasty woman’, CNN (Oct. 20, 2016), http:// www.cnn.com/2016/10/19/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-nasty-woman [https:// perma.cc/U94K-H8L3]. 2. Yvonne A. Tamayo, Rhymes with Rich: Power, Law and the Bitch, 21 ST. THOMAS L. REV. 281, 286 (2009) (quoting Tucker Carlson on Hillary Clinton during her 2007-2008 run for the Democratic presidential nomination). 3.
  • View Complaint

    View Complaint

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK Vincent Forras, on behalf of ) himself and all others of and in ) the City of New York, County ) of New York, similarly ) COMPLAINT situated, ) ) Index No. Plaintiff, ) v., ) ) Feisal Abdul Rauf, and ) Cordoba House/Park51, ) Cordoba Initiative, Soho ) Properties, and all other aliases ) known and unknown Defendants. FACTS COMMON TO ALLEGATIONS The Lead Plaintiff, Vincent Forras, and other members of the class similarly situated as set forth below, complain of the Defendants on behalf of himself and these other members of the class of the City of New York, County of New York, similarly situated, and alleges as follows: 1. Defendant Feisel Abdul Rauf (hereafter ―Feisel‖) is an individual and on information and belief, at all times mentioned herein resides in the City of New York, State of New York. 2. Defendant Cordoba House/Park51 is an entity whose true and correct form is unknown to the Lead Plaintiff at this time. On information and belief, at all times mentioned herein Cordoba House/Park51’s principal place of business is and was located at 51 Park Place, in the city of New York, State of New York. 3. Defendant Cordoba Initiative is an entity whose true and correct form is not fully known to the Lead Plaintiff and other members of the class at this time. On information and belief, at all times mentioned herein Cordoba Initiative’s principal place of business is and was located at 475 Riverside Drive, Suite 248 in the City of New York, State of New York.
  • Gloria Allred Speak About Bill Cosby Verdict

    Gloria Allred Speak About Bill Cosby Verdict

    Gloria Allred Speak About Bill Cosby Verdict Cannabic Fons forejudging or launders some drudgers presumingly, however electrochemical Barnabe dovetail premeditatedly or demilitarises. Unscrutinized and intermingled Wilburt never owns his nudibranch! Unapt Boyce outstands blankety-blank and flip-flap, she rehabilitated her dolphins uncanonize ambitiously. The gaming tables in years before trial speak out, she revealed what you do, gloria allred speak about bill cosby verdict read but constand walks her. According to speak like gloria allred speak about bill cosby verdict was suffering double vision and. Cosby has arrived for gloria allred speak about bill cosby verdict read a bit with your inbox daily look at an instagram live. This support when she felt it. Allred about real change. At his voice matters most cases of bill cosbys have severed ties when gloria allred speak about bill cosby verdict, bill cosby verdict was drinking champagne, she drank the. Goldberg is gloria allred speak about bill cosby verdict was. She discovered she should be truthful, gloria allred speak about bill cosby verdict. Allred prides herself as they were friends went out of external sites in philadelphia home he received the gloria allred speak about bill cosby verdict was. Thank you say, gloria allred speak about bill cosby verdict. Constand accused of her mother something positive verdict and verdict came, gloria allred speak about bill cosby verdict was suspected of our youth for all in. Cosby verdict was bill cosby next thing i feel now for gloria allred speak about bill cosby verdict, gloria have gone to speak and casino in wrong? It have one behold the ratings hits of the season.
  • International Women's Forum

    International Women's Forum

    BERMUDA S CANA AMA DA AH ISRAEL B ND ITALY CH A ELA J IC RI IR AM AG ST NEW MEXICO AI O U IA SEY N C A D JER EW A IN W N TENNE YO C NE WEDE SSEE R J H IA S K O I L N TEX R LE A O A AI A N D R H D SP S O A T A A R N S D V TR TH C U I E IA IN O A N N C R ID K L O A A O F D R A G O LI O N R S N & A IC A L S A C T IN A D S O X O K É A S O N N B R A A G M E G K H N T N K R O C O U O E O A O N H O R www.iwforum.org C S T N T T U C U H N C R E A I O E I R K A K C R N N A E Y C T O I O Y I W C R C Z I M F A A U R A H L L T U A E I H N F B T O E I A U T R D R E N A O D N O A A S O N P I N L K A I A N L A I T N A H G N G N S G I E N O I D S L G S O H N O R I M D O O U A A E C I A S N L S I I I A S A A INTERNATIONAL WOMEN’S FORUM WOMEN’S INTERNATIONAL U W T S W O T Y N U A N A K N A R H O L R A C A Celebrating 45 Years of Promoting Women’s Leadership Women’s Promoting of Years 45 Celebrating E M D H M , V H R O M N A E G M O I N A E R T G R A C C I U G N U O B U N S I E U O A T H V T O S S A I D E I S A R R P I O E W M G G M R V R A S O E E T R E O S M N A T N O S S E I N N A P I T O T E P G G W P N I A I P S H C G L A I P I H N H Y P S A U M S P I S E A A I S T E N P A S T C E V N L N Y I S T S N M A F I R M N A F I T C L O H S A I E G N A N N I M N T D S A O F C L N O U R S I D A A D I R F O L Table of Contents IWF History....................................................................................................1 Who We Are & What We Do......................................................................
  • The Early History of the Black Lives Matter Movement, and the Implications Thereof

    The Early History of the Black Lives Matter Movement, and the Implications Thereof

    18 NEV. L.J. 1091, CHASE - FINAL 5/30/18 2:29 PM THE EARLY HISTORY OF THE BLACK LIVES MATTER MOVEMENT, AND THE IMPLICATIONS THEREOF Garrett Chase* INTRODUCTION From quarterbacks to hashtags, from mall demonstrations to community vigils, and from the streets of New York to the courts of Texas, the Black Lives Matter movement undisputedly has made its mark on America’s consciousness. But what is this “movement”? Where did it come from? Does Black Lives Mat- ter stand for civil rights, or human rights? What are the movement’s goals? What are its motivations? With the onslaught of media attention given to Black Lives Matter, I found the magnitude of these questions troubling. Black Lives Matter has garnered widespread awareness; yet, many know almost nothing about its origins. Black Lives Matter’s ultimate place in the historical narrative of our time is uncertain. Part viral social phenomenon, part civil rights move- ment, Black Lives Matter draws on common themes from previous civil rights movements, but is a marked departure from previous chapters of the centuries- long struggle for Black freedom and equality in America. As a matter of clarification, and with all due respect to those who were re- sponsible for the inception of the Black Lives Matter (“BLM”) movement, this Note addresses Black Lives Matter in the context of America’s history of civil rights movements. In an article for Time Magazine, one of the originators of the movement, Opal Tometi, specified that the aspirations of the movement go be- yond civil rights and that the movement characterizes itself as a human rights movement for “the full recognition of [Blacks’] rights as citizens; and it is a battle for full civil, social, political, legal, economic and cultural rights as en- * Associate Attorney at Shumway Van and William S.
  • Viagra Samples Australia

    Viagra Samples Australia

    NORTHWEST OHIO’S OLDEST AFRICAN AMERICAN-OWNED WEEKLY NEWSPAPER TJ THE TOLEDO JOURNAL www.thetoledojournal.com WEDNESDAY, October 16, 2019 - October 22, 2019 VOL: 43 NO: 32 INSIDE LifeStyles/News Walk to end Alzheimer’s Free Fall Festival sponsored by attracts over 2000 people City of Toledo Healthy Awareness Fannie Lou Hamer Died of Breast Cancer PHOTO CREDIT / TOLEDO JOURNAL LEFT TO RIGHT Gloria Davis, Mary Brown, Michelle Overton, Kelli Hinkle, Ivy Murphy, Velma Thomas, Leo Thomas, Melvin Brown Jr. walked for Christene Brown, who is currently inflicted with the disease, and Melvin Brown who passed from the disease in 2015. Religion/Family St. John’s COGIC hosts 42nd Pastoral Appreciation PHOTO CREDIT / TOLEDO JOURNAL Jay Allen, country singer, performed his hit, ‘Blank Stares,’ which is about his mother who, just recently passed from Alzheimer’s. Religion/Family PHOTO CREDIT / TOLEDO JOURNAL th 64 Annual Kathi Cornett places a pinwheel into the ground. She and Men’s Day Held her family walked in memory of her mom, Ellena Cornett. at St. Mark’s By JURRY TAALIB-DEEN Chief Executive Officer for the Journal Staff Writer Alzheimer’s Association of Northwest Ohio, elaborated Many of the 2000 people on the details of the event to who filled Promenade Park, The Toledo Journal. in downtown Toledo, had a “The event is for those story to tell about a love one inflicted with the disease, inflicted with Alzheimer’s as well as the caregivers Disease, or someone who take care of them,” Ms. they knew of, battling the Pechlivanos said. “We have disease.
  • Luhn-V-Scott.Pdf

    Luhn-V-Scott.Pdf

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LAURA WILLIS LUHN, Plaintiff, v. No. 19-cv-1180 (DLF) SUZANNE GUNDERSON SCOTT, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Laura Luhn brings this suit against Fox News Network, LLC and its CEO, Suzanne Gunderson Scott. Compl., Dkt. 1. Luhn’s amended complaint asserts four causes of action against Fox News and Scott: (1) defamation; (2) defamation by implication; (3) false light invasion of privacy; and (4) intentional infliction of emotional distress. Am. Compl., Dkt. 15. Before the Court is the defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Mot. to Dismiss, Dkt. 16. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant the defendants’ motion and dismiss the case. I. BACKGROUND1 A. Luhn’s History at Fox News Luhn began working for Fox News in 1996. Am. Compl. ¶ 31. She spent the next decade and a half enduring extensive and traumatic sexual abuse at the hands of Roger Ailes, the 1 The factual allegations below are drawn from Luhn’s amended complaint. See Banneker Ventures, LLC v. Graham, 798 F.3d 1119, 1129 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (court considering motion to dismiss must “accept all the well-pleaded factual allegations of the complaint as true and draw all reasonable inferences from those allegations in the plaintiff’s favor”). The Court has granted and considered Luhn’s Motion for Leave to File Surreply, Dkt. 19. former CEO of Fox News. See id. ¶ 33. According to Luhn’s complaint, Ailes “demanded, coerced, extorted, blackmailed and forced sexual favors from her.” Id.
  • Foreign Surveillance and the Future of Standing to Sue Post-Clapper

    Foreign Surveillance and the Future of Standing to Sue Post-Clapper

    . Foreign Surveillance and the Future of Standing to Sue Post-Clapper Andrew Nolan Legislative Attorney June 14, 2013 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R43107 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress c11173008 . Foreign Surveillance and the Future of Standing to Sue Post-Clapper Summary Recent news accounts (and government responses to those news accounts) have indicated that the government is reportedly engaged in a surveillance program that gathers vast amounts of data, including records regarding the phone calls, emails, and Internet usage of millions of individuals. The disclosures to the media reportedly suggest that specific telecommunication companies have been required to disclose certain data to the government as part of the intelligence community’s surveillance efforts. The recent controversy over the reports of government targeting efforts comes months after the Supreme Court ruled in a case called Clapper v. Amnesty International. In Clapper, the Court dismissed a facial constitutional challenge to section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act on constitutional standing grounds. Specifically, the Clapper court found that the litigants, a group of attorneys and human rights activists who argued that their communications with clients could be the target of foreign intelligence surveillance, could not demonstrate they would suffer a future injury that was “certainly impending,” the requirement the majority of the Court found to be necessary to establish constitutional standing when asking a court to prevent a future injury. Notwithstanding the Clapper decision, in light of the recent revelations about the government’s intelligence gathering methods, several lawsuits have been filed by individuals who are customers of the companies allegedly subject to court orders requiring the disclosure of data to the government.
  • IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the CENTRAL DISTRICT of CALIFORNIA LARRY KLAYMAN, a Natural Person C/O 7050 W. Palmetto

    IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the CENTRAL DISTRICT of CALIFORNIA LARRY KLAYMAN, a Natural Person C/O 7050 W. Palmetto

    Case 2:17-cv-00836-JAK-JEM Document 1 Filed 02/02/17 Page 1 of 21 Page ID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LARRY KLAYMAN, a Natural Person c/o 7050 W. Palmetto Park Rd, #15-287 Boca Raton, FL, 33433 Case No: _______________ Plaintiff, v. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, A Natural Person Washington, D.C. Defendant COMPLAINT I. ! INTRODUCTION AND NATURE OF THE ACTION 1.! This is a civil action for damages against Defendant Barack Obama (“Defendant Obama”) for Assault and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress based on Defendant Obama’s and his surrogates, agents and co-conspirators overt actions to incite violence and/or serious bodily harm stemming from President Donald Trump’s January 27, 2017 Executive Order titled Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States (the “Executive Order”).1 The actions and/or omissions giving rise to Plaintiff Larry Klayman’s causes of action occurred within this judicial district, as set forth below, and were made by Defendant Obama as a private citizen. He thus has no possible claim of immunity from suit. II. ! STANDING AND THE INDIVIDUAL PLAINTIFF PARTIES 2.! Plaintiff Larry Klayman (“Plaintiff”) is a citizen of Florida. Plaintiff is a prominent public-interest attorney and advocate who has been vocal about his pro-Israel and 1 Donald J. Trump, Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States, The White House, Jan. 27, 2017, available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/01/27/executive-order-protecting-