DOCSLIB.ORG

Denbury Presentation Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Denbury Presentation Template Corporate Presentation June 2015 ClickAbout to Forwardto edit edit Master- Lookingtitle title style styleStatements The data contained in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Such statements may relate to, among other things: long-term strategy; anticipated levels of future dividends and their rate of growth and sustainability; the length or severity of the oil price downturn in late 2014 and early 2015; forecasts of capital expenditures, drilling activity and developmental activities; timing of carbon dioxide (CO2) injections and production response to such tertiary flooding projects; estimated timing of pipeline construction or completion or the cost thereof; anticipated dates of completion of industrial plants to be constructed or under construction and the initial date of capture and amount of anthropogenic CO2; estimates of liquidity, costs, forecasted production rate or peak production rates and the growth thereof; estimates of hydrocarbon reserve quantities and values, including potential and recoverable reserves, CO2 reserves, and helium reserves; projected future hydrocarbon prices or costs; estimated future cash flows, including from our hedging positions, or uses of cash; availability of capital or borrowing capacity; estimated rates of return and overall economics; and anticipated availability and cost of equipment and services. These forward-looking statements are generally accompanied by words such as “believe”, “estimated”, “preliminary”, “projected”, “potential”, “anticipated”, “forecasted”, “expected”, “assume” or other words that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. These statements are based on management’s current plans and assumptions and are subject to a number of risk and uncertainties as further outlined in our most recent Form 10-K filed with the SEC. Therefore, actual results may differ materially from the expectations, estimates, forecasts, projections, or assumptions expressed in or implied by any forward-looking statement herein made by or on behalf of the Company. Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors – Current SEC rules regarding oil and gas reserves information allow oil and gas companies to disclose in filings with the SEC not only proved reserves, but also probable and possible reserves that meet the SEC’s definitions of such terms. We disclose only proved reserves in our filings with the SEC. Denbury’s proved reserves as of December 31, 2014 were estimated by DeGolyer and MacNaughton, an independent petroleum engineering firm. In this presentation, we make reference to probable and possible reserves, some of which have been estimated by our independent engineers and some of which have been estimated by Denbury’s internal staff of engineers. In this presentation, we also refer to estimates of original oil in place, resource or reserves “potential”, barrels recoverable, or other descriptions of volumes potentially recoverable, which in addition to reserves generally classifiable as probable and possible (2P and 3P reserves), include estimates of reserves that do not rise to the standards for possible reserves, and which SEC guidelines strictly prohibit us from including in filings with the SEC. These estimates, as well as the estimates of probable and possible reserves, are by their nature more speculative than estimates of proved reserves and are subject to greater uncertainties, and accordingly the likelihood of recovering those reserves is subject to substantially greater risk. 2 Denbury.com | NYSE: DNR 2 ClickA Different to to edit edit Kind Master titleof Oil title style Company style • Proven process Long-Term • Lower-risk & long-life assets Visibility • Tremendous resource potential • Fund capex & dividends with cash flow Capital • Relatively low capital intensity Flexibility • Adjust to oil price environment • Strategic CO2 supply Competitive • >1,100 miles of CO pipelines Advantages 2 • Large inventory of oil fields Denbury.com | NYSE: DNR 3 Click2015 Plan:to to edit editValue Master title Focused title style style ● Reduced capital spending by 50% for 2015 to $550MM . Planning on utilizing liquidity to take advantage of potential opportunities . Building liquidity to further enhance our solid financial position . Focusing on operational initiatives and increasing efficiency . Resulting in relatively flat production targets for 2015 and likely 2016 Denbury.com | NYSE: DNR 4 ClickInnovation to to edit edit & Master Improvement title title style style Teams (IITs) Identify opportunities to significantly improve the economic value and profitability of Denbury’s fields. Increase Field PV-10 and Cash Flow Reduce LOE, CO2 Purchases & CAPEX Process: ● Evaluate, improve operational processes (Production forecasting; reservoir management; knowledge sharing; facility modularization; reserves; and tertiary alternatives) . Increase sweep efficiency . Use of 4D seismic to increase CO2 flooding . Improve reservoir surveillance and geology descriptions . Increased awareness of potential above and below target zones Denbury.com | NYSE: DNR 5 ClickDenbury to to edit at edit a Master Glance title title style style Total 3P Reserves (12/31/14) ~1.2 BBOE % Oil Production (1Q15) 95% Total Daily Production – BOE/d (1Q15) 74,356 Proved PV-10 (12/31/14) $94.99 NYMEX Oil Price $8.7 billion Market Cap (5/28/15) $2.6 billion Total Debt (3/31/15) $3.6 billion CO2 Supply 3P Reserves (12/31/14) ~17 Tcf CO2 Pipelines Operated or Controlled >1,100 miles Credit Facility Availability (3/31/15) ~$1.1 billion Anticipated Annual Dividend per Share 2015E - $0.25 Denbury.com | NYSE: DNR 6 Click to edit Master title style ClickWhat is toCO edit2 EOR title & How style Much Oil Does it Recover? Transport Inject Secure via into CO Supply 2 Pipeline Oilfield Remaining Oil Primary ~20% CO2 EOR Delivers Almost as Much Secondary Production as Primary (Waterfloods) or Secondary Recovery(1) ~18% Tertiary (CO2 EOR) ~17% (1) Recovery of original oil in place based on history at Little Creek Field. Denbury.com | NYSE: DNR 7 Click to edit Master title style ClickU.S. Lower to edit-48 CO title2 EOR style Potential Technically Recoverable(1,2) (amounts in billions of barrels) Permian 9-21 East & Central Texas 6-15 Mid-Continent 6-13 California 3-7 South East Gulf Coast 3-7 Rockies 2-6 Other 0-5 Michigan/Illinois 2-4 Williston 1-3 Appalachia 1-2 Total: 33-83 (1) Source: 2013 DOE NETL Next Gen EOR (2) Total estimated recoveries on a gross basis utilizing CO2 EOR. Denbury.com | NYSE: DNR 8 Up to 16 Billion Gross Barrels Recoverable(1) Click to to edit edit Master title title style style in Our Two CO2 EOR Target Areas 2.8 to 6.6 MT ND Billion Barrels Estimated Recoverable in Rocky Mountain Region(2) WY Denbury-operated fields represent ~10% of total potential(3) AL MS LA TX Existing Denbury CO2 Pipelines Proposed Denbury CO2 Pipelines Denbury owned fields 3.7 to 9.1 Existing or Proposed CO2 Source Billion Barrels Owned or Contracted Estimated Recoverable in (1) Total estimated recoveries on a gross basis utilizing CO2 EOR, based on a variety of recovery factors. (2) (2) Source: 2013 DOE NETL Next Gen EOR Gulf Coast Region (3) Using approximate mid-points of ranges, based on a variety of recovery factors. Denbury.com | NYSE: DNR 9 CO EOR in Gulf Coast Region: Click2 to to edit edit Master title title style style Control of CO2 Sources & Pipeline Infrastructure Provides a Strategic Advantage Tinsley(3) Delhi(3) Summary(1) 46 MMBbls 45 MMBbls Tinsley Proved 179 Jackson Dome Potential 365 Delhi (2) Free State Produced-to-Date 99 Davis Pipeline Quitman (2) Heidelberg (3) Martinville Total MMBOEs 643 Sandersville Lake Sonat Summerland Soso Cypress Creek St. John Eucutta Yellow Creek MS Pipeline Brookhaven Cranfield Mallalieu (3) (3) Olive Houston Area Conroe Citronelle Little Creek Smithdale Hastings 60 - 80 MMBbls 130 MMBbls McComb Webster 60 - 75 MMBbls Mature Area(3) Thompson 30 - 60 MMBbls 170 MMBbls ~90 Miles (3) 150 - 215 MMBbls Cost: ~$220MM Heidelberg Lockhart Crossing 44 MMBbls Conroe Green Pipeline Donaldsonville ~325 Miles Webster Oyster Thompson Bayou Hastings Cumulative Production (3) Oyster Bayou 15 – 50 MMBoe 20 - 30 MMBbls 50 – 100 MMBoe > 100 MMBoe Denbury Owned Fields – Current CO2 Floods Denbury Owned Fields – Future CO2 Floods Fields Owned by Others – CO2 EOR Candidates (1) Proved tertiary oil reserves based on year-end 12/31/14 SEC proved reserves. Potential includes probable and possible tertiary reserves estimated by the Pipelines Company as of 12/31/14, using mid-point of ranges, based on a variety of recovery factors. Denbury Operated Pipelines (2) Produced-to-date is cumulative tertiary production through 12/31/14. Denbury Proposed Pipelines (3) Field reserves shown are estimated total potential tertiary reserves, including cumulative tertiary production through 12/31/14. Denbury.com | NYSE: DNR 10 CO EOR in Rocky Mountain Region: Click2 to to edit edit Master title title style style Control of CO2 Sources & Pipeline Infrastructure Provides a Strategic Advantage CO2 Sources Summary(1) Cedar Creek Anticline Area(4) Existing or Proposed CO2 Source DGC Beulah Proved 37 Owned or Contracted 260 - 290 MMBbls Potential 313 MONTANA Produced-to-Date(2) <1 NORTH DAKOTA Total MMBbls 351 Bell Creek(4) 40 - 50 MMBbls Elk Basin ~130 Miles Cost:~$225MM LaBarge Area 368 BCF Nat Gas Greencore Pipeline 13 BCF Helium 232 Miles ~250 Miles 3.0 TCF CO (3) 2 Cost:~$500MM Hartzog Draw(4) SOUTH DAKOTA Lost Cabin (COP) 20 - 30 MMBbls WYOMING Cumulative Production Riley Ridge (DNR) 15 – 50 MMBoe 50 – 100 MMBoe Grieve Field(4) > 100 MMBoe Shute Creek Denbury Owned Fields – Current CO2 Floods (XOM) Existing CO2 6 MMBbls Denbury Owned Fields – Future CO2 Floods Pipeline Fields Owned by Others – CO2 EOR Candidates Pipelines (1) Proved tertiary oil reserves based on year-end 12/31/14 SEC proved reserves. Potential includes probable and possible tertiary reserves estimated by the Denbury Pipelines Company as of 12/31/14, using approximate mid-points of ranges, based on a variety of recovery factors.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effective Tax Rates for Oil and Gas Companies Cashing in on Special Treatment
    Effective Tax Rates for Oil and Gas Companies Cashing in on Special Treatment July 2014 Table of Contents Page Results in Brief …………………………………………………………………….. 3 Discussion ……………………………………………………………………………. 4 Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………… 6 Notes …………………………………………………………………………………… 6 U.S. Federal Effective Tax Rates, 2009-2013 …………………………… 7 Foreign Effective Tax Rates, 2009-2013 ………………………………..... 8 Deferred Tax Liabilities from Property, Plant, and Equipment in 2012 and 2013……………………………………………………………………….. 9 Appendix: Company Profiles ExxonMobil Corporation ……………………………………………......... 10 ConocoPhillips …………………………………………………………………. 12 Occidental Petroleum Corporation …………………………………….. 14 Chevron Corporation ………………………………………………………… 15 Anadarko Petroleum Corporation ………………………………………. 17 Chesapeake Energy Corporation …………………………………......... 19 EOG Resources, Inc. …………………………………………………........ 20 Devon Energy Corporation …………………………………………......... 22 Apache Corporation ………………………………………………………….. 23 Pioneer Natural Resources Company ………………………………….. 25 Continental Resources, Inc. ……………………………………………… 27 Marathon Oil Corporation …………………………………………………. 28 Hess Corporation ……………………………………………………………… 29 Range Resources Corporation ……………………………………………. 30 Plains Exploration & Production Company …………………………. 31 SandRidge Energy, Inc. ……………………………………………………. 33 Whiting Petroleum Corporation …………………………………………. 34 Denbury Resources, Inc. ………………………………………………….. 35 Noble Energy, Inc. …………………………………………………………… 36 Concho Resources Inc. …………………………………………………….. 37 Company Notes …………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • IPAA 2019 Oil and Gas Investment Symposium
    IPAA 2019 Oil and Gas Investment Symposium April 8, 2019 NYSE:DNR www.denbury.com Cautionary Statements Forward-Looking Statements: The data and/or statements contained in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, as that term is defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements may be or may concern, among other things, financial forecasts, future hydrocarbon prices and their volatility, current or future liquidity sources or their adequacy to support our anticipated future activities, our ability to further reduce our debt levels, possible future write-downs of oil and natural gas reserves, together with assumptions based on current and projected production levels, oil and gas prices and oilfield costs, current or future expectations or estimations of our cash flows or the impact of changes in commodity prices on cash flows, availability of capital, borrowing capacity, price and availability of advantageous commodity derivative contracts or the predicted cash flow benefits therefrom, forecasted capital expenditures, drilling activity or methods, including the timing and location thereof, the nature of any proposed future asset purchase or sales or dispositions or the timing or proceeds thereof, estimated timing of commencement of CO2 flooding of particular fields or areas, including CCA, or the availability of capital for CCA pipeline construction, or its ultimate cost or its date of completion, timing of CO2 injections and initial production responses in tertiary flooding projects, development activities, finding costs, anticipated future cost savings, capital budgets, interpretation or prediction of formation details, production rates and volumes or forecasts thereof, hydrocarbon reserve quantities and values, CO2 reserves and supply and their availability, potential reserves, barrels or percentages of recoverable original oil in place, levels of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Tax Rates for Oil and Gas Companies
    Effective Tax Rates of Oil and Gas Companies: Cashing in on Special Treatment July 2014 Table of Contents Page Results in Brief …………………………………………………………………….. 3 Discussion ……………………………………………………………………………. 4 Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………… 6 Notes …………………………………………………………………………………… 6 U.S. Federal Effective Tax Rates, 2009-2013 …………………………… 7 Foreign Effective Tax Rates, 2009-2013 ………………………………..... 8 Deferred Tax Liabilities from Property, Plant, and Equipment in 2012 and 2013……………………………………………………………………….. 9 Appendix: Company Profiles ExxonMobil Corporation ……………………………………………......... 10 ConocoPhillips …………………………………………………………………. 12 Occidental Petroleum Corporation …………………………………….. 14 Chevron Corporation ………………………………………………………… 15 Anadarko Petroleum Corporation ………………………………………. 17 Chesapeake Energy Corporation …………………………………......... 19 EOG Resources, Inc. …………………………………………………........ 20 Devon Energy Corporation …………………………………………......... 22 Apache Corporation ………………………………………………………….. 23 Pioneer Natural Resources Company ………………………………….. 25 Continental Resources, Inc. ……………………………………………… 27 Marathon Oil Corporation …………………………………………………. 28 Hess Corporation ……………………………………………………………… 29 Range Resources Corporation ……………………………………………. 30 Plains Exploration & Production Company …………………………. 31 SandRidge Energy, Inc. ……………………………………………………. 33 Whiting Petroleum Corporation …………………………………………. 34 Denbury Resources, Inc. ………………………………………………….. 35 Noble Energy, Inc. …………………………………………………………… 36 Concho Resources Inc. …………………………………………………….. 37 Company Notes …………………………………………………………………
    [Show full text]
  • Denbury Resources 2016 Annual Reports
    2016 ANNUAL REPORT The data and/or statements contained in this annual report that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, as that term is defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements may be or may concern, among other things, financial forecasts, future hydrocarbon prices and timing and degree of any price recovery versus the length or severity of the current commodity price downturn, current or future liquidity sources or their adequacy to support our anticipated future activities, our ability to further reduce our debt levels, possible future write-downs of oil and natural gas reserves, together with assumptions based on current and projected oil and gas prices and oilfield costs, current or future expectations or estimations of our cash flows, availability of capital, borrowing capacity, future interest rates, availability of advantageous commodity derivative contracts or the predicted cash flow benefits therefrom, forecasted capital expenditures, drilling activity or methods, including the timing and location thereof, estimated timing of commencement of carbon dioxide (CO2) flooding of particular fields or areas, dates of completion of to-be-constructed industrial plants and the initial date of capture of CO2 from such plants, timing of CO2 injections and initial production responses in tertiary flooding projects, acquisition plans andnd pproposals and dispositions, development activities, finding costs, anticipated
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Report for Cedar Creek Anticline CO2 Pipeline and EOR Development Project
    United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management DOI-BLM-MT-C020-2017-0081-EA Denbury Green Pipeline-MT, LLC, Denbury Onshore, LLC Cedar Creek Anticline CO2 Pipeline and EOR Development Project Location: Powder River County, Carter County, Fallon County, Montana (MT) Scoping Report U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Miles City Field Office 111 Garryowen Road Miles City, MT 59301 Phone: 406-233-2800 FAX: 406-233-2921 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................................... 1 IMPLEMENTATION OF SCOPING PROCESS ....................................................................................................... 1 RESULTS OF THE SCOPING PROCESS .................................................................................................................. 1 Comments from the Public ............................................................................................................................. 2 Local, State and Federal Agency Comments ................................................................................................ 2 Tribal Consultation .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Methodology and Summary
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Presentation September 2019 Cautionary Statements
    Corporate Presentation September 2019 Cautionary Statements Forward-Looking Statements: The data and/or statements contained in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, as that term is defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements may be or may concern, among other things, financial forecasts, future hydrocarbon prices and their volatility, current or future liquidity sources or their adequacy to support our anticipated future activities, our ability to further reduce our debt levels or extend debt maturities, together with assumptions based on current and projected production levels, oil and gas prices and oilfield costs, current or future expectations or estimations of our cash flows or the impact of changes in commodity prices on cash flows, availability of capital, borrowing capacity, price and availability of advantageous commodity derivative contracts or the predicted cash flow benefits therefrom, forecasted capital expenditures, drilling activity or methods, including the timing and location thereof, the nature of any future asset purchases or sales or the timing or proceeds thereof, estimated timing of commencement of CO2 flooding of particular fields or areas, including Cedar Creek Anticline (“CCA”), or the availability of capital for CCA pipeline construction, or its ultimate cost or date of completion, timing of CO2 injections and initial production responses in tertiary flooding
    [Show full text]
  • Denbury Resources Inc
    DENBURY RESOURCES INC FORM 10-K (Annual Report) Filed 02/28/13 for the Period Ending 12/31/12 Address 5320 LEGACY DRIVE PLANO, TX 75024 Telephone 9726732000 CIK 0000945764 Symbol DNR SIC Code 1311 - Crude Petroleum and Natural Gas Industry Oil & Gas Operations Sector Energy Fiscal Year 12/31 http://www.edgar-online.com © Copyright 2013, EDGAR Online, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Distribution and use of this document restricted under EDGAR Online, Inc. Terms of Use. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 2012 FORM 10-K (Mark One) Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 OR Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from _________ to________ Commission file number 1 -12935 DENBURY RESOURCES INC. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 20-0467835 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 5320 Legacy Drive, Plano, TX 75024 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (972) 673-2000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class: Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered: Common Stock $.001 Par Value New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018-2019 Term
    2018-2019 Term NPC Membership by Category Categories are listed by principal function Category Number of Members Integrated, Refining and Oil & Gas Production Companies Integrated Companies and Independent Refiners 16 Larger Independent Producers 29 Smaller Independent Producers 25 Midstream and Retail Oil & Gas Companies 32 Support Service Companies Construction, Drilling, and Oilfield Services 24 Financial and Consultant Services 30 Electric Companies and Other Large Consumers 13 Non-Industry and Not-For-Profit Members 34 Total 203 by Organization | by Name INTEGRATED, REFINING AND OIL & GAS PRODUCTION COMPANIES Integrated Companies and Independent Refiners BP America Inc. John C. Mingé Houston, Texas Former Chairman and President Chevron Corporation Michael K. Wirth San Ramon, California Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer CVR Energy, Inc. David L. Lamp Sugar Land, Texas Chief Executive Officer and President Eni S.p.A. Claudio Descalzi Rome, Italy Chief Executive Of ficer and General Manager Equinor ASA Torgrim Reitan Houston, Texas Executive Vice President Development & Production International Exxon Mobil Corporation Darren W. Woods Irving, Texas Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Flint Hills Resources, LLC Jeffrey P. Ramsey Wichita, Kansas President and Chief Executive Officer Hunt Consolidated Energy, LLC Hunter L. Hunt Dallas, Texas President and Chief Executive Officer Hunt Consolidated, Inc. Ray L. Hunt Dallas, Texas Executive Chairman Murphy Oil Corporation Roger W. Jenkins El Dorado, Arkansas President and Chief Executive Officer Phillips 66 Company Greg C. Garland Houston, Texas Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Repsol J. Jon Imaz Madrid, Spain Chief Executive Officer Shell Oil Company Bruce Culpepper Houston, Texas Former President Sinclair Oil Corporation Ross B.
    [Show full text]
  • US Oil and Gas Reserves and Production Study 2019 Table of Contents
    US oil and gas reserves and production study 2019 Table of contents Study overview 1 Study highlights 2 Capital expenditures 4 Revenues and results of operations 5 Oil reserves 7 Gas reserves 9 Performance measures Proved reserve acquisition costs, finding and development 10 costs and reserve replacement costs Production replacement rates 11 Production costs 13 Company statistics 14 Peer groups 26 Appendix 27 Contacts 29 Study overview The US oil and gas reserves and production study is a compilation and analysis of oil and gas reserve disclosure information as reported by publicly traded companies in their annual reports filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This report presents the US exploration and production (E&P) results for the five-year period from 2014 through 2018 for the 50 largest companies based on 2018 end-of-year US oil and gas reserve estimates. The study companies cover approximately 42% of the US combined oil and gas production for 2018 (44% for 2017). Activities related to acquisitions have also been reflected as described in the appendix. Study companies Due to the significance of the oil and gas reserves attributable to the study companies, the results of these companies are generally representative of the US E&P industry as a whole. Total US production is fast approaching a leading global position, giving this study’s findings an impact beyond the US borders, but it should be noted that results for these companies and for the E&P industry as a whole may be significantly different in other regions of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 | Annual Report Operating Areas
    2019 | ANNUAL REPORT OPERATING AREAS ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION GULF COAST REGION Denbury Operated CO2 Pipelines Denbury Owned Fields – Current CO2 Floods Denbury Planned CO Pipelines Denbury Owned Fields – Potential CO Floods 2 2 CO2 Pipelines Owned by Others Naturally-Occurring CO2 Source Fields Owned by Others – CO2 EOR Candidates Industrial CO2 Sources Owned or Contracted 81,7('67$7(66(&85,7,(6$1'(;&+$1*(&200,66,21 :DVKLQJWRQ'& )250. 0DUN2QH ;$QQXDOUHSRUWSXUVXDQWWR6HFWLRQRU G RIWKH6HFXULWLHV([FKDQJH$FWRI For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 OR 7UDQVLWLRQUHSRUWSXUVXDQWWR6HFWLRQRU G RIWKH6HFXULWLHV([FKDQJH$FWRI )RUWKHWUDQVLWLRQSHULRGIURP WR &RPPLVVLRQILOHQXPEHU '(1%85<5(6285&(6,1& (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) 'HODZDUH (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) /HJDF\'ULYH 3ODQR7; (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) 5HJLVWUDQW¶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
    [Show full text]
  • Hartzog Draw Hartzog Draw
    Analyst Day VALUE Presentation DRIVEN November 2013 NYSE: DNR Denbury.com ClickAbout to Forward edit Master-Looking title style Statements The data contained in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Such statements may relate to, among other things: long-term strategy; anticipated levels of future dividends and rate of dividend growth; forecasts of capital expenditures, drilling activity and development activities; timing of carbon dioxide (CO2) injections and initial production response to such tertiary flooding projects; estimated timing of pipeline construction or completion or the cost thereof; dates of completion of to-be-constructed industrial plants and their first date of capture of anthropogenic CO2; estimates of costs, forecasted production rates or peak production rates and the growth thereof; estimates of hydrocarbon reserve quantities and values, CO2 reserves, helium reserves, future hydrocarbon prices or assumptions; future cash flows or uses of cash, availability of capital or borrowing capacity; rates of return and overall economics; estimates of potential or recoverable reserves and anticipated production growth rates in our CO2 models; estimated production and capital expenditures for full-year 2013 and 2014 and periods beyond; and availability and cost of equipment and services. These forward-looking statements are generally accompanied by words such as “estimated”, “preliminary”, “projected”, “potential”, “anticipated”, “forecasted”, “expected”, “assume” or other words that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. These statements are based on management’s current plans and assumptions and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties as further outlined in our most recent Form 10-K and Form 10-Q filed with the SEC.
    [Show full text]
  • Filed by Linnco, LLC and Linn Energy, LLC Commission File Nos
    Filed by LinnCo, LLC and Linn Energy, LLC Commission File Nos. 001-35695 and 000-51719 Pursuant to Rule 425 Under the Securities Act of 1933 And Deemed Filed Pursuant to Rule 14a-12 Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Subject Company: Berry Petroleum Company Commission File No. 001-09735 Berry Petroleum Town Hall Meetings February 22, 2013 Mark Ellis Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Embrace & Drive Change Pursue Growth Take Action Respect Others Be Passionate Connect Our Values Embrace and Drive Change Pursue Growth Take Action Respect Others Be Passionate Connect 4 Who We Are Connected to our employees, families and communities A top-10 MLP/LLC LINN Energy is… A top-15 independent oil and natural gas E&P Passionate about leading the business sector we started Dedicated employees with ownership in the company driving our growth LINN Energy has… A company that takes action Investors who are confident in our business model A sustainable asset inventory Embrace new employees and provide all employees with opportunities to grow personally and professionally Grow through acquisitions and organic activities LINN Energy will… Maintain our financial stability Operate in a manner that protects employees, contractors, the public and environment 5 Our Strategy LINN’s primary business objective is to provide stability and growth of distributions to our unitholders (LINE) and shareholders (LNCO) Focus on U.S. onshore basins providing significant opportunities for future growth and consolidation Target acquisitions providing long-life, high-quality production with predictable decline curves and low- risk development opportunities Organically grow reserves and production Reduce cash flow volatility through hedging 6 MLP and Independent E&P Rankings LINN is one of the largest MLP and independent E&P companies 7th largest public MLP/LLC th 11 largest domestic independent oil & natural gas company Rank Master Limited Partnership Enterprise Value ($MM) Rank Independent E&P Enterprise Value ($MM) 1.
    [Show full text]