Cutthroat Trout Study 1998

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cutthroat Trout Study 1998 NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE STATEWIDE FISHERIES MANAGEMENT FEDERAL AID JOB PROGRESS REPORT F-20-52 2016 LAHONTAN CUTTHROAT TROUT STUDY WESTERN REGION NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, FISHERIES DIVISION ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT Table of Contents Content Page SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. 1 OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................. 2 PROCEDURES ............................................................................................................... 3 FINDINGS ....................................................................................................................... 6 MANAGEMENT REVIEW ............................................................................................... 9 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................. 13 NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE, FISHERIES DIVISION ANNUAL PROJECT REPORT State: Nevada Project Title: Statewide Fisheries Program Job Title: Lahontan Cutthroat Trout Study Period Covered: January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 SUMMARY Lahontan cutthroat trout (LCT, Oncorhynchus clarkii henshawi) population monitoring surveys were completed in the Montana Mountains (Crowley Creek, Washburn Creek, Riser Creek, and Pole Creek), Trout Creek Mountains (Corral Canyon Creek), Black Rock Range (Colman Creek, North Fork Battle Creek, and Battle Creek), and Santa Rosa Range (Andorno Creek, Threemile Creek, Long Canyon Creek, South Indian Creek, and Indian Creek). Riparian habitat assessments and livestock monitoring occurred in coordination with Bureau of Land Management and US Forest Service staff regularly during the spring, summer, and fall grazing seasons. BACKGROUND LCT is the only native trout occurring in the Lahontan Basin. LCT were distributed in the drainages of ancient Lake Lahontan and, as conditions became more arid during the last 5,000 to 12,000 years, they survived as small populations in isolated headwater streams of many mountain ranges throughout Nevada, Oregon, and California. The settlement of the Great Basin brought livestock grazing, urban development, mining, water diversions, and introduction of non-native trout resulting in hybridization and competition that led to significant declines in the range and number of this unique cutthroat trout species. In response to these declines, LCT was listed as endangered in 1970, but reclassified as threatened in 1975. In January 1995, the USFWS released a recovery plan for the Lahontan cutthroat trout. LCT was historically common in the Quinn River, Black Rock, and Little Humboldt sub-basins of the Humboldt River system. The Blackrock Drainage may have had as many as 46 streams occupied by LCT. Presently, LCT is thought to occupy only 15% of its historic stream habitat in the Quinn River-Blackrock drainages. Populations have suffered from habitat loss, hybridization with nonnative salmonids, and extended droughts. Recovery action in the Quinn River drainage is the priority in the 1995 USFWS Lahontan Cutthroat Trout Recovery Plan. The final draft of the LCT Species Management Plan was completed in 1999. This plan, written under the umbrella of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife LCT Recovery Plan, contains management strategies and objectives that outline the processes that will be used to guide activities. Nevada Department of Wildlife (NDOW) and the Quinn- Blackrock Geographic Management Unit (GMU) Team have used this plan to guide recovery efforts since its signing. 1 OBJECTIVES • Coordinate with Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife to sample up to 30 miles of streams within the McDermitt Basin for hybridization with nonnative rainbow trout and the presence of nonnative fish species. • Augment the Sage Creek population of LCT with a suitable LCT source stock that will be identified through population monitoring and genetic analysis. • Conduct population monitoring on LCT populations in Crowley Creek (Montana Mountains, approximately 1.5 miles), Pole Creek (Montana Mountains, approximately 1.5 miles), Washburn Creek (Montana Mountains, approximately 4 miles), Riser Creek (Montana Mountains, approximately 4 miles), Sage Creek (Trout Creek Mountains, approximately 8 miles), Corral Canyon Creek (Trout Creek Mountains, approximately 4 miles), Line Canyon Creek (Trout Creek Mountains, approximately 3 miles), North Fork Battle Creek (Black Rock Range, approximately 2 miles), Battle Creek (Black Rock Range, approximately 1 mile), Colman Creek (Black Rock Range, approximately 4 miles), Threemile Creek (Santa Rosa Range, approximately 4 miles), Eightmile Creek (Santa Rosa Range, approximately 4 miles), South Fork Indian Creek (Santa Rosa Range, approximately 4 miles), Andorno Creek (Santa Rosa Range, approximately 3 miles), and Long Canyon Creek (Santa Rosa Range, approximately 5 miles). • Collect fin clips from LCT populations as available and submit samples to the University of Nevada, Reno for genetic analysis. • Coordinate with BLM, Winnemucca District staff to complete regular monitoring on the Jordan Meadows Allotment in the Montana Mountains to ensure land use practices are occurring as permitted. • Examine the feasibility of conducting a chemical treatment to eradicate nonnative fish in Wash O’Neil Creek and complete the treatment if favorable conditions permit. • Survey waters on the Sheldon National Wildlife Refuge to determine suitability for establishing out-of-basin population of LCT to use in recovery efforts. • Mechanically eradicate nonnative brook trout from Abel Creek in the upper one mile of stream habitat, and examine the possibility of reestablishing Abel Creek LCT in North Fork Abel Creek. • Reintroduce LCT in Happy Creek in the Jackson Mountains. • Conduct General Aquatic Wildlife Surveys (GAWS) Level III stream surveys on streams as needed and identified to assist in LCT recovery efforts. • Capture LCT from North Fork Battle Creek, Battle Creek, and Colman Creek to assist in recovery efforts within the McDermitt Creek system by augmenting existing LCT populations or reestablishing LCT populations in streams within the McDermitt Creek watershed. • Collect disease free and pure brood-sized LCT or fertilized eggs to be hatched and raised in a controlled hatchery environment and later stocked as fingerling sized trout in waters within the McDermitt Creek system. • Introduce LCT into Cottonwood Creek in the Wassuk Mountain Range, Mount Grant (Mineral County). 2 PROCEDURES Coordinate with Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife to sample up to 30 miles of streams within the McDermitt Basin for hybridization with nonnative rainbow trout and the presence of nonnative fish species. NDOW staff attended an angler outreach meeting in McDermitt, NV on September 13, 2016 to hear concerns from the angling public on efforts to reestablish LCT within the McDermitt Basin. Several possible alternatives were discussed on moving forward with LCT recovery in McDermitt Creek, but no action plans were established. NDOW staff also attended a Trout Creek Working Group meeting hosted by ODFW on September 14, 2016 where land management issues in the Trout Creek Mountains were discussed. Augment the Sage Creek population of LCT with a suitable LCT source stock that will be identified through population monitoring and genetic analysis. Based on 2016 surveys completed on LCT occupied waters throughout the NWGMU, Battle Creek, North Fork Battle Creek, and Colman Creek were identified as potential source stocks for augmentation and reintroduction efforts in Sage Creek. However, no LCT were moved into Sage Creek due to low water conditions during early fall 2016. Conduct population monitoring on LCT populations in Crowley Creek (Montana Mountains, approximately 1.5 miles), Pole Creek (Montana Mountains, approximately 1.5 miles), Washburn Creek (Montana Mountains, approximately 4 miles), Riser Creek (Montana Mountains, approximately 4 miles), Sage Creek (Trout Creek Mountains, approximately 8 miles), Corral Canyon Creek (Trout Creek Mountains, approximately 4 miles), Line Canyon Creek (Trout Creek Mountains, approximately 3 miles), North Fork Battle Creek (Black Rock Range, approximately 2 miles), Battle Creek (Black Rock Range, approximately 1 mile), Colman Creek (Black Rock Range, approximately 4 miles), Threemile Creek (Santa Rosa Range, approximately 4 miles), Eightmile Creek (Santa Rosa Range, approximately 4 miles), South Fork Indian Creek (Santa Rosa Range, approximately 4 miles), Andorno Creek (Santa Rosa Range, approximately 3 miles), and Long Canyon Creek (Santa Rosa Range, approximately 5 miles). LCT population monitoring was completed on Riser Creek (May 24 and June 14, 2016), Long Canyon Creek (June 7, 2016), South Fork Indian Creek (June 8 and July 7, 2016), Indian Creek (June 8, 2016), Crowley Creek (June 15, 2016), Threemile Creek (June 22, 2016), North Fork Battle Creek (June 28 and 29, 2016), Andorno Creek (July 12, 2016), Corral Canyon Creek (July 13, 2016), Washburn Creek (July 20, 2016), and Colman Creek (July 26, 2016). All LCT captured during surveys were measured and released unharmed into the water where they were captured. Single-pass electrofishing with 30.5 m (100 ft) transects at established survey locations were completed on Long Canyon Creek, South Fork
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 2 Management Plan
    Chapter 2 Management Plan Mahogany Canyon in the High Rock Canyon Wilderness 2.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter contains objectives and decisions for managing the natural, physical and cultural resources described in the Act and those located in parts of the planning area not included in the National Conservation Area or designated Wilderness Areas. Background information is provided for each of these resources to establish points of reference for the decisions that follow. 2.2 PROGRAM-SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES AND DECISIONS 2.2.1 LAND HEALTH STANDARDS Land Health Standards are expressions of physical and biological condition or degree of function required for sustainable environmental health. These standards engender measurements that describe on- the-ground conditions in relation to the four fundamentals of healthy, properly functioning ecosystems that are identified at 43 CFR § 4180. These fundamentals are: • Watersheds in properly functioning physical condition; soil and plant conditions support infiltration, soil moisture storage, and the release of water that is in balance with climate and landform and maintain or improve water quality, water quantity, and timing and duration of flow. Ecological processes, including the hydrologic cycle, nutrient cycle, and energy flow, are maintained in order to support healthy biotic populations and communities. • Water quality complies with State water quality standards and achieves BLM management objectives. • Habitats are restored or maintained for listed, proposed, candidate and other special status species. BLACK ROCK-HIGH ROCK RMP 2-1 JULY 2004 Chapter 2 –Management Plan Standards are achieved through the use of guidelines developed for specific programs and uses. Because the Standards were originally applied to livestock grazing, guidelines for livestock grazing (Appendix B) will continue to apply to that use.
    [Show full text]
  • Mule Deer and Antelope Staff Specialist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist
    STATE OF NEVADA Steve Sisolak, Governor DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Tony Wasley, Director GAME DIVISION Brian F. Wakeling, Chief Mike Cox, Bighorn Sheep and Mountain Goat Staff Specialist Pat Jackson, Predator Management Staff Specialist Cody McKee, Elk Staff Biologist Cody Schroeder, Mule Deer and Antelope Staff Specialist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist Western Region Southern Region Eastern Region Regional Supervisors Mike Scott Steve Kimble Tom Donham Big Game Biologists Chris Hampson Joe Bennett Travis Allen Carl Lackey Pat Cummings Clint Garrett Kyle Neill Cooper Munson Sarah Hale Ed Partee Kari Huebner Jason Salisbury Matt Jeffress Kody Menghini Tyler Nall Scott Roberts This publication will be made available in an alternative format upon request. Nevada Department of Wildlife receives funding through the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration. Federal Laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability. If you believe you’ve been discriminated against in any NDOW program, activity, or facility, please write to the following: Diversity Program Manager or Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Nevada Department of Wildlife 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Mailstop: 7072-43 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Suite 120 Arlington, VA 22203 Reno, Nevada 8911-2237 Individuals with hearing impairments may contact the Department via telecommunications device at our Headquarters at 775-688-1500 via a text telephone (TTY) telecommunications device by first calling the State of Nevada Relay Operator at 1-800-326-6868. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE 2018-2019 BIG GAME STATUS This program is supported by Federal financial assistance titled “Statewide Game Management” submitted to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Burning Man Geology Black Rock Desert.Pdf
    GEOLOGY OF THE BLACK ROCK DESERT By Cathy Busby Professor of Geology University of California Santa Barbara http://www.geol.ucsb.edu/faculty/busby BURNING MAN EARTH GUARDIANS PAVILION 2012 LEAVE NO TRACE Please come find me and Iʼll give you a personal tour of the posters! You are here! In one of the most amazing geologic wonderlands in the world! Fantastic rock exposure, spectacular geomorphic features, and a long history, including: 1. PreCambrian loss of our Australian neighbors by continental rifting, * 2. Paleozoic accretion of island volcanic chains like Japan (twice!), 3. Mesozoic compression and emplacement of a batholith, 4. Cenozoic stretching and volcanism, plus a mantle plume torching the base of the continent! Let’s start with what you can see on the playa and from the playa: the Neogene to Recent geology, which is the past ~23 million years (= Ma). Note: Recent = past 15,000 years http://www.terragalleria.com Then we’ll “build” the terrane you are standing on, beginning with a BILLION years ago, moving through the Paleozoic (old life, ~540-253 Ma), Mesozoic (age of dinosaurs, ~253-65 Ma)) and Cenozoic (age of mammals, ~65 -0 Ma). Neogene to Recent geology Black Rock Playa extends 100 miles, from Gerlach to the Jackson Mountains. The Black Rock Desert is divided into two arms by the Black Rock Range, and covers 1,000 square miles. Empire (south of Gerlach)has the U.S. Gypsum mine and drywall factory (brand name “Sheetrock”), and thereʼs an opal mine at base of Calico Mtns. Neogene to Recent geology BRP = The largest playa in North America “Playa” = a flat-bottomed depression, usually a dry lake bed 3,500ʼ asl in SW, 4,000ʼ asl in N Land speed record: 1997 - supersonic car, 766 MPH Runoff mainly from the Quinn River, which heads in Oregon ~150 miles north.
    [Show full text]
  • Thacker Pass Lithium Mine Final EIS, Appendix B, Mining Plan Of
    Final Environmental Impact Statement Thacker Pass Lithium Mine Project Appendix B Mining Plan of Operations This page intentionally left blank. Appendix B – Mining Plan of Operations APPENDIX B. MINING PLAN OF OPERATIONS Thacker Pass Lithium Mine Project B-1 Final Environmental Impact Statement Appendix B – Mining Plan of Operations This page intentionally left blank. B-2 Thacker Pass Lithium Mine Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Thacker Pass Project Proposed Plan of Operations and Reclamation Plan Permit Application July 2019 October 2019 - Revised Submitted to: Bureau of Land Management Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Winnemucca District Bureau of Mining Regulation and Reclamation Humboldt River Field Office 901 S Stewart Street, Suite 4001 5100 East Winnemucca Boulevard Carson City, Nevada 89701 Winnemucca, Nevada 89445 Submitted by: LithiumNevada Lithium Nevada Corp. 3685 Lakeside Drive Reno, Nevada 89509 Contact: Edward (Ted) Grandy, VP Legal and Regulatory Affairs Thacker Pass Project – Plan of Operations and Reclamation Plan LithiumNevada Summary Lithium Nevada Corp. (LNC), a wholly owned subsidiary of Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC), proposes to construct, operate, reclaim, and close an open pit lithium mining and processing operation, the Thacker Pass Project (Project), located on public lands in northern Humboldt County, Nevada. The surface and subsurface mineral estates associated with the Project are located on public lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Winnemucca District, and controlled by federal unpatented lode mining claims owned by LNC. LNC is submitting this Plan of Operations and Reclamation Plan (Plan) to develop the Project in accordance with BLM Surface Management Regulations under 43 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 3809, Surface Occupancy regulations under 43 CFR 3715, and Nevada reclamation regulations under Nevada Administrative Code (NAC) 519A.
    [Show full text]
  • Biostratigraphy of the Bilk Limestone (Permian), Northwestern Nevada
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Graduate School Collection WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship Spring 1972 Biostratigraphy of the Bilk Limestone (Permian), Northwestern Nevada Erich Thomas Western Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Thomas, Erich, "Biostratigraphy of the Bilk Limestone (Permian), Northwestern Nevada" (1972). WWU Graduate School Collection. 731. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet/731 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Graduate School Collection by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BIOSTRATIGRAPHY OF THE BILK LIIffiSTONE (PERMIAN), NORTHWESTERN NEVADA A Thesis Presented to The Facvilty of Western Washington State College In Partial Fxilfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science ty Erich Thomas May 1972 BIOSTRATIGRAPHY OF THE BILK LB'fESTONE (PERMIAN), NORTHWESTERN NEVADA tiy Erich Thomas Accepted in Partial Completion of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Advisory Committee Chairman MASTER'S THESIS In presenting thisthesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master's degree at Western Washington University, I grant to Western Washington University the non-exclusive royalty-free rightto archive, reproduce, distribute, and display the thesis in any and all forms, including electronic format, via any digital library mechanisms maintained by WWU. I represent and warrant this is my original work and does not infringe or violate any rights of others. I warrant that I have obtained written permissions from the owner of any third party copyrighted material included in these files.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Study Areas
    I ___- .-ll..l .“..l..““l.--..- I. _.^.___” _^.__.._._ - ._____.-.-.. ------ FEDERAL LAND M.ANAGEMENT Status and Uses of Wilderness Study Areas I 150156 RESTRICTED--Not to be released outside the General Accounting Wice unless specifically approved by the Office of Congressional Relations. ssBO4’8 RELEASED ---- ---. - (;Ao/li:( ‘I:I)-!L~-l~~lL - United States General Accounting OfTice GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-262989 September 23,1993 The Honorable Bruce F. Vento Chairman, Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands Committee on Natural Resources House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: Concerned about alleged degradation of areas being considered for possible inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System (wilderness study areas), you requested that we provide you with information on the types and effects of activities in these study areas. As agreed with your office, we gathered information on areas managed by two agencies: the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLN) and the Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service. Specifically, this report provides information on (1) legislative guidance and the agency policies governing wilderness study area management, (2) the various activities and uses occurring in the agencies’ study areas, (3) the ways these activities and uses affect the areas, and (4) agency actions to monitor and restrict these uses and to repair damage resulting from them. Appendixes I and II provide data on the number, acreage, and locations of wilderness study areas managed by BLM and the Forest Service, as well as data on the types of uses occurring in the areas.
    [Show full text]
  • National Mining District, Nevada
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR BULLETIN 601 OF THE NATIONAL MINING DISTRICT, NEVADA BY WALDEMAR LINDGREN WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1915 CONTENTS. Preface, by F. L. Eansome................................................. 5 Location and field work..................................................... 7 Santa Rosa Range......................................................... 7 « Topography........................................................... 7 Climate and vegetation................................................ 10 Geology............................................. i ................ 10 Mineral deposits........................................................ 12 Principal divisions................................................. 12 Older mineral deposits............................................. 12 Tertiary mineral deposits........................................... 14 Metal production of Santa Rosa Range.................................. 16 Literature of Santa Rosa Range......................................... 17 National mining district.................................................... 18 Situation.............................................................. 18 History................................................................ 19 Prospecting and mining............................................. 19 Leasing........................................................... 20 General geology.............:.......................................... 21 The rocks............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rose-Marcella-Thesis-2020.Pdf
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE Nebkha Morphology, Distribution and Stability Black Rock Playa, Nevada A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Arts in Geography By Marcella Rose December 2019 The thesis of Marcella Rose is approved: _______________________________________ _____________ Dr. Julie Laity Date _______________________________________ _____________ Dr. Thomas Farr Date _______________________________________ _____________ Dr. Amalie Orme, Chair Date California State University, Northridge ii Acknowledgements Dr. Orme, I really don’t think that there is a sufficient combination of words that exist to properly express the immense amount of gratitude I feel for everything that you have done for me. This college education changed my life for the better and I hope you realize what a significant role you were within that experience. I am thankful that not only did I get a great professor, but also a friend. Dr. Laity, thank you so much for having faith in me and for taking me on as one of your last students to advise. But most of all, thank you for pushing me to be better – I needed that. Dr. Farr, I was so excited during DEVELOP that you accepted to be a part of my committee. It was a pleasure to work with you within the Black Rock Playa research team but then to also take our research a step further for this graduate thesis. I would also like to thank the staff at the Bureau of Land Management, Winnemucca: Dr. Mark E. Hall, Field Manager of the Black Rock Field Office; Shane Garside, Black Rock Station Manager/ Outdoor Recreation Planner; Brian McMillan, Rangeland Management Technician; and Braydon Gaard, Interim Outdoor Recreation Planner.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Water Resources-Reconnaissance Series Report 20
    - STATE OF NEVADA ~~~..._.....,.,.~.:RVA=rl~ AND NA.I...U~ a:~~::~...... _ __,_ Carson City_ GROUND-WATER RESOURCES-RECONNAISSANCE SERIES REPORT 20 GROUND- WATER APPRAISAL OF THE BLACK ROCK DESERT AREA NORTHWESTERN NEVADA By WILLIAM C. SINCLAIR Geologist Price $1.00 PLEASE DO NOT REMO V~ f ROM T. ':'I S OFFICE ;:: '· '. ~- GROUND-WATER RESOURCES--RECONNAISSANCE SERIES .... Report 20 =· ... GROUND-WATER APPRAISAL OF THE BLACK ROCK OESER T AREA NORTHWESTERN NEVADA by William C. Sinclair Geologist ~··· ··. Prepared cooperatively by the Geological SUrvey, U. S. Department of Interior October, 1963 FOREWORD This reconnaissance apprais;;l of the ground~water resources of the Black Rock Desert area in northwestern Nevada is the ZOth in this series of reports. Under this program, which was initiated following legislative action • in 1960, reports on the ground-water resources of some 23 Nevada valleys have been made. The present report, entitled, "Ground-Water Appraisal of the Black Rock Desert Area, Northwe$tern Nevada", was prepared by William C. Sinclair, Geologist, U. s. Geological Survey. The Black Rock Desert area, as defined in this report, differs some~ what from the valleys discussed in previous reports. The area is very large with some 9 tributary basins adjoining the extensive playa of Black Rock Desert. The estimated combined annual recharge of all the tributary basins amounts to nearly 44,000 acre-feet, but recovery of much of this total may be difficult. Water which enters into the ground water under the central playa probably will be of poor quality for irrigation. The development of good produci1>g wells in the old lake sediments underlying the central playa appears doubtful.
    [Show full text]
  • A Subspecies Name for the Indigenous Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus Clarkii) of the Humboldt River, Upper Quinn River, and Coyote Basin Drainages, Nevada and Oregon
    Western North American Naturalist Volume 68 Number 1 Article 8 3-28-2008 The case for humboldtensis: a subspecies name for the indigenous cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii) of the Humboldt River, Upper Quinn River, and Coyote Basin drainages, Nevada and Oregon Patrick C. Trotter Seattle, Washington Robert J. Behnke Colorado State University, Fort Collins Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan Recommended Citation Trotter, Patrick C. and Behnke, Robert J. (2008) "The case for humboldtensis: a subspecies name for the indigenous cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii) of the Humboldt River, Upper Quinn River, and Coyote Basin drainages, Nevada and Oregon," Western North American Naturalist: Vol. 68 : No. 1 , Article 8. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan/vol68/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western North American Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Western North American Naturalist 68(1), © 2008, pp. 58–65 THE CASE FOR HUMBOLDTENSIS: A SUBSPECIES NAME FOR THE INDIGENOUS CUTTHROAT TROUT (ONCORHYNCHUS CLARKII) OF THE HUMBOLDT RIVER, UPPER QUINN RIVER, AND COYOTE BASIN DRAINAGES, NEVADA AND OREGON Patrick C. Trotter1 and Robert J. Behnke2 ABSTRACT.—In the early years of his research on the native trouts of western North America, Behnke (1960, 1966, 1979) observed consistent differences in certain meristic characters between the cutthroat trout of the Humboldt River drainage and those from the Truckee, Carson, and Walker river drainages of the Lahontan Basin, and proposed that the Humboldt trout be recognized as a distinct subspecies.
    [Show full text]
  • Winnemucca District Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement DOI-BLM-NV-W000-2010-0001-EIS
    BLM Winnemucca District Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement DOI-BLM-NV-W000-2010-0001-EIS Volume 2: Chapters 3, 4 Winnemucca District, Nevada District, Winnemucca August 2013 Winnemucca MISSION STATEMENT To sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. BLM/NV/WN/ES/13-11+1793 Volume 2 of 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Resources ....................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.1 Air Quality ............................................................................................ 3-2 3.2.2 Geology ............................................................................................. 3-14 3.2.3 Soil Resources .................................................................................. 3-18 3.2.4 Water Resources ............................................................................... 3-22 3.2.5 Vegetation – General ......................................................................... 3-36 3.2.6 Vegetation – Forest/Woodland Products ........................................... 3-41 3.2.7 Vegetation – Invasive and Noxious Species ...................................... 3-42 3.2.8 Vegetation
    [Show full text]
  • Gravity and Magnetic Data Along a Seismic Refraction-Reflection Line in Northwest Nevada and Northeast California
    Gravity and Magnetic Data Along a Seismic Refraction-Reflection Line in Northwest Nevada and Northeast California By Janet E. Tilden, David A. Ponce, Jonathan M.G. Glen, and Kathleen D. Gans Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Report Series 2005-1446 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................1 Acknowledgments .........................................................................................................................1 Gravity and Magnetic Data............................................................................................................1 Gravity Methods .........................................................................................................................2 Magnetic Methods......................................................................................................................3 General Discussion .......................................................................................................................3 References Cited ..........................................................................................................................5 Appendix .....................................................................................................................................11 Figures Figure 1. Shaded relief
    [Show full text]