Village Design Statement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Village Design Statement BARKING-cum-DARMSDEN Suffolk , r .-- ­ \ J / Introduction T his Village Design How does the Statemen t has been Design research ed and pre pared by Statement work? the residents o f Bar king and D ar msden to describe the The Barking-cum­ visual character and qualities Darmsden Village Design o f the two villages within Statement has been adopted the ir land scape setting. by the District Council as Supplementary Planning The Statement has been Guidance. It will be a guided by a local design team material consideration when in close liaison with Mid dealing with planning Suffo lk Di strict Co uncil. It applications. draws together local knowledge, views and ideas A statutory process about the villages o f Barking already exists for the Parish Council to be consulted on and D arrnsden as they are planning applications. The now and how an y future Parish Council, in The village sign on BarkingTye development sho uld conjunction with the Village The photographs of Barking and cont ribu te in a positive way to Design Group, will have Darmsden which appear the unique character th at has regard to the terms of the throughout this document have design statement and will built up over centuries o f been chosen to illustrate comment on the design growth. positive examples of design in aspects of applications Change can occur in many terms of scale and proportions, accordingingly. ways, no t o nly by large scale colour, texture, materials, planting and so on. commercial or ho using The Statement also deve lopment s, but also by contains recommendations small incremental changes to that are aimed at all those features such as garden fences small-scale changes that and walls, doo rs, windo ws, could have a significant roofs and even bv the choice impact on the appearance of the villages but do not, in o f trees and sh ru bs planted in themselves, need planning gardens and hedges. An ill permission. They are tho ught out decision co uld included in order to present change the appearanc e o f a a complete picture of the house, a view o r an ope n Parish and everyone space forever or un til future involved in village life is change takes place. asked to think about them This Statem ent is before making any decisions about changing the therefore relevant to: appearance of their property. • every householder and property owner in the Contents Parish • the Local Planning Introduction Authority and its officers • the provider s of local Historical background 2 services and facilities • developers, builders, Landscape, character and the architects, engineers and natural environment 4 designers The built environment 6 • the Parish Council and other local community The economy 10 groups. Highways 12 Historical background Shaping o f th e present mano r was sold by the Crown . pr essure o n unregulated areas settlement perhaps began to Francis N eed ham. I t led to ma ny commons being with the es tablishment o f a subseq uen tly pa ssed int o the completely ab so rbed, in so me Ro man Road, the route of hands o f Francis Theobald, cases th e name became the which can still be detected the Rev Joseph G ascoigne, only legac y. Fo rtu nately for along the no rtherly end o f Joh n Crowley and th en the Barking, approximately 30 Barking Tye. Scattered Earl o f Ashburnham (1756). acres o f fine o pen spa ce still settlements, developed d uring The ambitions of Sir Francis remain and are set to be Saxon times, bearing the Needham appear to have lain preserved as a lasting amenity names 'B erica's Peop le' and with the we aving settlement within the settlement. Barking 'Der rnodesaduna giving rise in the corner o f the pari sh Tye would have derived its to presen t da y names. w here he es ta blishe d a identity as an un encl osed E stablishment o f the two ma rket, based on the Barking p oo r qu ality gra zing area of ch urches wou ld no doubt Fair and to which of course the Man or of Barking. T he have provided community he gave his name. N eedham need fo r g razing diminished and ident ity that continues up Market, being on a line o f and the value o f o pe n spaces to the present da y. communication, saw increase d was increas ingly rec ogn ised . develo pmen t, leaving Barki ng T he Tye was regi stered as orman times and D arrnsd en in the wings. commo n under the The D o mesday Boo k Co m mo ns Registration Ac t of recorded Barki ng with 60 The Victorian 1965 and in 1969 byelaws inhabitants (ad ult males) and parish we re passed to regulate its St. Mary's Church with 83 The Local Government management and use. The six acres of free land. Barking Act 1888 created the civil remaining co m moner s' rig hts Manor belo nged to the Abbot pari sh o f Ba rking cu m are rec orded and recogni sed of St.'E theld reda and D arrnsden. T his act and bu t are no longer exercised . ex tensive productive subseq uent local gove rn ment From about 190 9, East woodland s Scattered settlements, developed legislation Suffolk Co un ty Council incl uding during Saxon times, bearing the established pro mo ted tenant farming an d Boney th e purchased three 'Cou nty names 'Berica's People' and (Bo nny) fra mework farms' within the Parish Wood wer e 'Dermodesaduna' gave for pub lic namely Top, Middle and menti o ned . rise to the present day names. health an d Lower Fa rm s, two o f which Unde r the Normans, Barking utili ties.T his manifested itself st ill remain as tenant ed Mano r was vested in the in Barking and incidentally in working farms. Bisho pric o f E ly villages throughout the (subse q uen tly pro viding coun try by the construction ccess sus te na nce or income fo r the of local autho rity hou sing, a It seem s likely th at access Church until 1611 ). Two o f 'Board' school (closed in to the villages between the mano rial farms were also 1952, to become a much used Ro man tim es and the req uired to provide vic tuals to village hall), piped water, imp rov ement of the present the religio us o rder at E ly. electricity and in 1981, mai ns road fro m the Gipping Valley It see ms that Barking was drainage. The To wn and was at bes t difficult, per hap s largely spared the ravages o f Country Planning Act 1947 leavin g Barking and 'Black D eath ' due to the saw the first active public D ar rnsden ra ther iso lated qu arantine still remem ber ed co nt rol o f development. with em ployment mainly lo cal in the name 'C hai nhouse' at and ag ricultural. The railway Needham Market one and a The Tye cam e to N eedham Market in half miles away. In year s gone by, Barking 1846 and later Barking was Tye was a relatively large inclu ded o n a Squirrel's bu s The Reformation common. Over the years, route, however until th e o nse t D uring the refo r mation, pa rts o f the Tye became of Wo dd War II, with the the Ch urch was relieved o f absorbed in to surro unding strategic need fo r improved Barking M anor. In 16 11, the properti es. T his kin d o f 2 acces s to Wattisham Airfi eld, problem. Many people have the road remained acc ess to one or more cars D espite the linear nature o f unmetalled. altho ugh, in so me instances, Barking,u there is a srronzb Perhaps the change in use residents' particular sense o f identi ty and of the road and the motor car circumstanc es and the paucity community, and a positive have given rise to the greates t of public transport dict ates wish not only to preser ve single change in village Life that the y mo ve away fro m the those features of the rur al env ironment. th rough out its long histor y. settlement which are thou bzht wort hw hile but also to c i em brace beneficial change. h n s e Altho ugh Bark.ing-cum­ Of particular present day D armsden remains a united significance is the fact that Parish, the two set tlemen ts Barking Tye has been retain their individuality and registered unde r the special characteristics. Countryside Premium D espite the significant Scheme thu s continuing the di fferences and no direct pre servation and Linking road, there is em pa thy, imp ro vem ent o f the o pe n mutual concern and not space that is indivisible from in frequ ent Barki ng. "Although Barking-cum­ The wartime soci al Darmsden remains a united contact. Watti sham Parish , the two settlements retain Barking Airfield is now now has their individuality and special an Important around characteristics." Army 150 dwellings and a Helic opter population o f so me 410, Base. Apart from the obviou s D armsden 26 and 50 benefit of providin g much respectively.
Recommended publications
  • Village Design Statement

    Village Design Statement

    EAST MERSEA VILLAGE PLAN AND DESIGN STATEMENT Published By East Mersea Parish Council On Behalf Of the east mersea village plan and design statement working party Page 1 July 2013 July 2013 Page 2 VILLAGE PLAN AND DESIGN STATEMENT CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 6 WHAT IS A VILLAGE DESIGN STATEMENT? 6 WHY PRODUCE ONE FOR EAST MERSEA? 6 HOW IT WAS PRODUCED 6 THE DESIGN STATEMENT AND THE PLANNING PROCESS 7 THE VILLAGE PLAN 7 HISTORY AND CHARACTER 7 CELTIC MERSEA 7 ROMAN MERSEA 7 THE SAXONS, DANES AND THE NORMANS 8 MEDIEVAL 8 THE TWENTIETH CENTURY 8 FAMOUS RESIDENTS 9 MAIN ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES 10 EAST MERSEA PARISH CHURCH 10 TRADITIONAL ESSEX BUILDINGS 11 JACOBEAN, GEORGIAN AND VICTORIAN HOUSES 11 THE DORMY HOUSES 11 POST WAR PERIOD 12 COMMERCIAL AND AGRICULTURAL 12 NEW ESSEX STYLE 12 MODERN HOUSES 13 FRONTAGES 13 SUSTAINABILITY 13 CONCLUSION 13 LANDSCAPE AND SURROUNDINGS 14 LAND USAGE 14 CROPS 14 LIVESTOCK 14 CHANGES IN LAND USE 14 HEDGES AND VERGES 14 COAST AND SEA 15 ROADS AND BUILDINGS 16 REWSALLS LANE/EAST ROAD/MEETING LANE 16 CHURCH LANE 18 SHOP LANE 18 IVY LANE/ EAST ROAD 19 ACCESS ROUTES AND TRAFFIC 19 ROADS AND TRAFFIC 19 TRAFFIC CALMING 19 STREET FURNITURE 19 PARKING 20 LARGE AND HEAVY VEHICLES 20 LOCAL BUSINESS 20 Page 3 July 2013 INTRODUCTION 20 LEISURE INDUSTRY 20 BUSINESSES 20 VILLAGE AMENITIES AND EVENTS 20 VILLAGE SHOP AND POST OFFICE 20 COUNTRY KITCHEN 21 COURTYARD CAFÉ 21 DOG AND PHEASANT PUBLIC HOUSE 21 ST EDMUNDS CHURCH 21 CUDMORE GROVE COUNTRY PARK 21 Opening Times 21 MERSEA OUTDOORS 21 MERSEA RUGBY CLUB 21 OTHER AMENITIES 21
  • Newtown Linford Village Design Statement 2008

    Newtown Linford Village Design Statement 2008

    Newtown Linford Village Design Statement 2008 Newtown Linford Village Design Statement 2008 Contents Title Page Executive summary 2-6 The Purpose of this Village Design Statement 7 1. Introduction 8 The purpose and use of this document. Aims and objectives 2. The Village Context 9-10 Geographical and historical background The village today and its people Economics and future development 3. The Landscape Setting Visual character of the surrounding countryside 11-12 Relationship between the surrounding countryside and the village periphery Landscape features Buildings in the landscape 4. Settlement Pattern and character 13-15 Overall pattern of the village Character of the streets and roads through the village Character and pattern of open spaces 5. Buildings & Materials in the Village 16-26 1. The challenge of good design 2. Harmony, the street scene 3. Proportions 4. Materials 5. Craftsmanship 6. Boundaries 7. Local Businesses 8. Building guidelines 6. Highways and Traffic 27-29 Characteristics of the roads and Footpaths Street furniture, utilities and services 7. Wildlife and Biodiversity 30-32 8. Acknowledgments 33 9. Appendix 1 Map of Village Conservation Area 34 Listed Buildings in the Village 35 10. Appendix 2 Map of the SSSI & Local Wildlife Sites 36 Key to the SSSI & Local Wildlife Sites 37-38 “Newtown Linford is a charming place with thatched and timbered dwellings, an inviting inn and a much restored medieval church in a peaceful setting by the stream - nor is this all, for the village is the doorstep to Bradgate Park, one of Leicestershire’s loveliest pleasure grounds,... … … with the ruins of the home of the ill fated nine days queen Lady Jane Grey” Arthur Mee - “Leicestershire” - Hodder and Stoughton.
  • Urban Design Directory ― 2015/17

    Urban Design Directory ― 2015/17

    URBAN DESIGN DIRECTORY URBAN DESIGN DIRECTORY Urban Design Directory ― 2015/17 TOPIC: DESIGN CODES TOPIC: ADAPTING TO TOPIC: CORE CITIES TOPIC: MILTON KEYNES TOPIC: JOY OF STREETS CLIMATE CHANGE 104 AT 40 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL: ECOPOLIS NOW E U FRANCIS TIBBALDS A PERSONAL MANIFESTO TRANSPORT PLANNING SSUE 103 SS FRANCIS TIBBALDS AWARD PROJECTS I THE FAR PAVILIONS STATE OF THE ART IN THE FUTURE AWARD PROJECTS SHORTLIST: HATFIELD RENFREW RIVERSIDE WOOLWICH TOWN SHORTLIST: URRIDAHOLT CENTRE PLYMOUTH RETAIL 2007 I HOLT TOWN MERTON RISE ER 2008 ISSUE 105 QUARTER MN GRAHAME PARK U T U UMMER 2007 WINTER 2007 ISSUE 101 WINT SPRING 2007 ISSUE 102 ― S A 2015 /17 PRICE £5.00 PRICE £5.00 PRICE £5.00 ISSN 1750 712X PRICE £5.00 PRICE £5.00 ISSN 1750 712X ISSN 1750 712X ISSN 1750 712X ISSN 1750 712X UDcover-101.indd 1 11/12/06 12:09:48 UD104-cover.indd 1 18/9/07 09:55:51 UD105-cover.indd 1 28/11/07 10:22:01 UDcover-102.indd 1 15/3/07 08:49:48 TOPIC: CREATIVE CITIES TOPIC: LIVERPOOL TOPIC: IN BETWEEN TOPIC: RE-IMAGINING TOPIC: EDUCATION TOPIC: BIG CITY TOPIC: COASTAL TOWNS 107 112 110 PLANNING 108 SPACES 109 THE CITY E EUROPEAN CAPITAL E E E FRANCIS TIBBALDS REGENERATION IN FRANCIS TIBBALDS OF CULTURE AWARD PROJECTS FRANCIS TIBBALDS CROYDON AND PSIRI SSU SSUE 111 SSU SSUE TRANSFORMING AVILES FRANCIS TIBBALDS SSU I I AWARD PROJECTS I AWARD PROJECTS I AWARD PROJECTS SHORTLIST: SHORTLIST: FRANCIS TIBBALDS URBAN DESIGN IN SHORTLIST: LESSONS FROM RIGA SHORTLIST: KINGS CROSS LOWER MILL ESTATE TELFORD MILLENNIUM AWARD PROJECTS LOW-INCOME AREAS DUNSFOLD PARK 2008 I TEMPLE QUAY 2 2008 ISSU 2009 ST.
  • Priority-Setting for National Health Policies, Strategies and Plans

    Priority-Setting for National Health Policies, Strategies and Plans

    IA DC OP B ME PSPS PC 1 SP C SA LR DS Strategizing national health in the 21st century: a handbook Chapter 4 Priority-setting for national health policies, strategies and plans Frank Terwindt Dheepa Rajan Agnes Soucat © WHO /HFP IA DC OP B ME PSPS PC 1 SP C Chapter 4 Priority-setting for national health policies, strategies and plans SA 1 LR DS © WHO/Benoit Mathivet IA DC OP B ME PSPS PC 1 SP C Strategizing national health in the 21st century: a handbook SA 2 LR DS LR SNL OP B ME PS PC I SP C SA IP DHC I Chapter 1 Introduction: strategizing national health in the 21st century P C Chapter 2 Population consultation on needs and expectations S A Chapter 3 Situation analysis of the health sector P S Chapter 4 Priority-setting for national health policies, strategies and plans S P Chapter 5 Strategic planning: transforming priorities into plans O P Chapter 6 Operational planning: transforming plans into action C Chapter 7 Estimating cost implications of a national health policy, strategy or plan B Chap ter 8 Budgeting for health ME Chapter 9 Monitoring and evaluation and review of national health policies, strategies and plans Cross-cutting topics relevant to national health planning LR Chapter 10 Law, regulation and strategizing for health SNL Chapter 11 Strategizing for health at sub-national level IP Chapter 12 Intersectoral planning for health and health equity DHC Chapter 13 Strategizing in distressed health contexts IA DC OP B ME PSPS PC 1 SP C Chapter 4 Priority-setting for national health policies, strategies and plans SA 3 LR DS Priority-setting
  • Village Design Statement Supplementary P Lanning Document

    Village Design Statement Supplementary P Lanning Document

    Stillingfleet Village Design Statement Supplementary P lanning Document December 2 0 0 9 C ontents VDS O bjectives Purpose of a Village Design Statement 1 To Provide a record of local distinctiveness by The Stillingfleet Village Design 1 describing the unique qualities and character of Statement the village. Map of Stillingfleet 2 To identify the key features and characteristics Summary of Design Characteristics 3 of the local natural and built environment to be Introduction to Stillingfleet 4 respected and protected from the impact of Conservation & Listing 5 inappropriate development. Village Layout & Access 6 To provide design guidance for new House Siting & Design 7 development so that change is managed and Landscaping 8 development is in harmony with its setting. Appendices To achieve a higher standard of sustainable What is a Village Design Statement 9 design and where possible to enhance the local and how do I use it? environment. General advice for prospective 11 developers To increase the involvement and influence of the local community in the planning system. L ocation M ap Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of the controller of Her Majesty's Stationary Office. ©Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Selby District Council 100018656 P urpose of a Village Design Statement Purpose of a Village Design Statement 1.4 The VDS is written so that all developers 1.0 Our villages all occupy a unique position can avoid lengthy discussion in the planning in the surrounding countryside, and have application process, as the design context is evolved over hundreds of years to suit the clearly set out from the beginning.
  • West Bergholt – Village Design Statement

    West Bergholt – Village Design Statement

    WEST BERGHOLT – VILLAGE DESIGN STATEMENT Village Design Statements are intended to provide design guidance to people who are thinking about proposed developments such as an alteration to an existing property, the construction of new dwellings or commercial premises, or even the provision of street furniture. Produced November 2011 rev A W E S T B E R G H O L T - Thinking about the future Village Design Statement W EST BERGHOLT PARISH COUNCIL CONTENTS What is a Village Design Statement? Page 3 Findings of the Parish Plan Page 4 Process of producing the Village Design Statement Page 6 Use of the Village Design Statement Page 7 Map of West Bergholt Page 8 History and Development of West Bergholt Page 9 Industry and Commerce in West Bergholt Page 12 The VDS and its Planning Status Page 13 Landscape Character and Setting Page 15 Design Guidance: for New Developments and House Extensions Page 17 Transport, Highways, Footpaths and Village Streets Page 23 Plan of Village : Showing Village Envelope, TPOs, Listed Buildings, Open Spaces and Restricted Development areas Page 26 CBC Planning Policy and Design Guidance Page 29 VDS Members Page 33 P a g e 2 rev A W E S T B E R G H O L T - Thinking about the future Village Design Statement W EST BERGHOLT PARISH COUNCIL WHAT IS A VILLAGE DESIGN STATEMENT? A Village Design Statement (VDS) gives a detailed description of the existing character and main features of design in the village and guidelines for how this should be respected in any new development.
  • Broadway Neighbourhood Plan: Pre-Submission Version

    Broadway Neighbourhood Plan: Pre-Submission Version

    Broadway Neighbourhood Plan 2006 – 2030 Pre-Submission Consultation Version This page is intentionally blank Broadway Neighbourhood Development Plan: Pre-Submission FINAL_v2_13 August 2020 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. THE ROLE OF NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 7 2. THE VILLAGE AND PARISH OF BROADWAY 9 3. VILLAGE CHARACTER 10 4. OUR VISION 17 5. POLICIES FOR BROADWAY 18 5.1 Future Housing and Development (HD) 18 • Policy HD.1: Development Boundary and Infill 19 • Policy HD.2: Use of Garden Land 29 • Policy HD.3: Use of Brownfield Land 30 • Policy HD 4: Site Allocation Land off Kennel Lane / Church Close 31 • Policy HD.5: Rural Exception Housing and Affordable Homes 34 • Policy HD.6: Local Gaps 36 • Policy HD.7: Housing Mix 39 • Policy HD.8: Pedestrian Access to Amenities 41 5.2 Built Environment (BE) 42 • Policy BE.1: Design Principles 43 • Policy BE.2: Masterplans 50 • Policy BE.3: Designing Out Crime 51 • Policy BE.4: Heritage Assets 52 • Policy BE.5: Replacement Dwellings 54 • Policy BE.6: Extensions and Conversions 55 • Policy BE.7: Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 56 • Policy BE.8: Creating a Strong Sense of Place 57 o Built Environment Project 1: Design Review Panels 58 5.3 Natural Environment (NE) 59 • Policy NE.1: Trees, Woodlands and Hedgerows 60 • Policy NE.2: Valued Landscapes, Vistas and Skylines 64 Broadway Neighbourhood Development Plan: Pre-Submission FINAL__v2_13 August 2020 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page • Policy NE.3: Local Green Spaces 73 • Policy NE.4: Green Wedge 81 • Policy NE.5: Highway Verges and Adjacent Areas 84
  • Urban Redevelopment in Shenzhen, China Neoliberal Urbanism, Gentrification, and Everyday Life in Baishizhou Urban Village

    Urban Redevelopment in Shenzhen, China Neoliberal Urbanism, Gentrification, and Everyday Life in Baishizhou Urban Village

    DEGREE PROJECT IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, SECOND CYCLE, 30 CREDITS STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2019 Urban Redevelopment in Shenzhen, China Neoliberal Urbanism, Gentrification, and Everyday Life in Baishizhou Urban Village JOHAN BACKHOLM KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT Urban Redevelopment in Shenzhen, China Neoliberal Urbanism, Gentrification, and Everyday Life in Baishizhou Urban Village JOHAN BACKHOLM Master’s Thesis. AG212X Degree Project in Urban and Regional Planning, Second Cycle, 30 credits. Master’s Programme in Sustainable Urban Planning and Design, School of Architecture and the Built Environment, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. Supervisor: Kyle Farrell. PhD Fellow, Division of Urban and Regional Studies, Department of Urban Planning and Environment, School of Architecture and the Built Environment, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. Examiner: Andrew Karvonen. Associate Professor, Division of Urban and Regional Studies, Department of Urban Planning and Environment, School of Architecture and the Built Environment, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. Author contact: [email protected] Stockholm 2019 Abstract Urban redevelopment is increasingly used as a policy tool for economic growth by local governments in Chinese cities, which is taking place amid rapid urbanization and in an expanding globalized economy. Along with the spatial transformation, urban redevelopment often entails socioeconomic change in the form of processes of gentrification,
  • The Sizewell C Project

    The Sizewell C Project

    The Sizewell C Project 6.3 Volume 2 Main Development Site Chapter 8 Conventional Waste and Material Resources Appendix 8A Waste Management Strategy Revision: 1.0 Applicable Regulation: Regulation 5(2)(a) PINS Reference Number: EN010012 May 2020 Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Sizewell C Waste Management Strategy 02 March 2020 Mott MacDonald Mott MacDonald House 8-10 Sydenham Road Croydon CR0 2EE United Kingdom T +44 (0)20 8774 2000 F +44 (0)20 8681 5706 mottmac.com Sizewell C Waste Management 346846 1 D Strategy Mott MacDonald 02 March 2020 Mott MacDonald Limited. Registered in England and Wales no. 1243967. Registered office: Mott MacDonald House, 8-10 Sydenham Road, Croydon CR0 2EE, United Kingdom Mott MacDonald | Sizewell C Waste Management Strategy Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Introduction 3 1.2 Objectives 4 1.3 Scope 4 1.4 Methodology 5 2 Waste Policy 7 2.1 Introduction 7 2.2 Legislative considerations 7 2.2.1 Waste Framework Directive (2008/98/EC) 7 2.2.2 Landfill Directive (1999/31/EC) 7 2.2.3 Hazardous Waste Directive (91/689/EEC) 7 2.3 National Legislation 7 2.3.1 The Environmental Protection Act 1990 8 2.3.2 The Waste (England and Wales) Regulations 2011 (2011/988) 8 2.3.3 Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016 (2016/1154) 8 2.3.4 Controlled Waste Regulations 2012 9 2.3.5 Hazardous Waste (England and Wales) Regulations 2005 9 2.3.6 Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Regulations 2013 9 2.3.7 Waste Batteries and Accumulators
  • Julianstown Village Design Statement Process Evaluation Report

    Julianstown Village Design Statement Process Evaluation Report

    Julianstown Village Design Statement (VDS) A National ‘Pilot’ for the Heritage Council’s new National Village Design Statement Programme II ‘PROCESS’ EVALUATION REPORT JUNE 2011 Julianstown Village Design Statement (VDS) A National ‘Pilot’ for the Heritage Council’s new National Village Design Statement Programme II ‘Process’ Evaluation Report (Draft Final) June 2011 © The Heritage Council 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be printed or reproduced or utilised in any electronic, mechanical,or other means, now known or heretoafter invented, including photocopying or licence permitting restricted copying in Ireland issued by the Irish Copyright Licencing Agency Ltd., The Writers Centre, 19 Parnell Square, Dublin 1 Published by the Heritage Council ISSN 1393 6794 ISBN 978-1-906304-17-1 Contents Section Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Village Design Statement Programme II Philosophy 5 3. Purpose and methodology of the VDS ‘process’ 12 evaluation 4. The ‘Pilot’ VDS Process 15 5. ‘Pilot’ VDS Process Evaluation – Conclusions 34 6. Recommendations: Key and Associated 38 References and Further Reading 43 Appendices: Appendix 1: Membership of National Village Design Statement Programme II Steering Group (NVDSSG) Appendix 2 Heritage Council/JDCA/Meath County Council Consultants’ Brief and Invitation to Tender for a ‘Pilot’ for the National Village Design Programme II, June 2009 Appendix 3: Membership of Julianstown VDS Sub-group Appendix 4: Membership of ‘Pilot’ VDS Steering Group for Julianstown Appendix 5: Julianstown Community Survey, May 2010 Acknowledgements The author (Martin McCormack, Tipperary Institute) would like to express gratitude to all who participated in the evaluation, including Julianstown community members, VDS Steering and Sub-Group members, Mr Tom Dowling, Manager, Meath County Council; Mr.
  • Latin America URBAN DESIGN GROUP URBAN

    Latin America URBAN DESIGN GROUP URBAN

    Winter 2016 Urban Design Group Journal 13URBA 7 N ISSN 1750 712X DESIgn LATIN AMERICA URBAN DESIGN GROUP URBAN DESIGN GROUP NewsUDG NEWS Both the UK’s National Planning Policy must offer in order to provide consistent VIEW FROM THE Framework and the Farrell Review promoted high standards of advice. CHAIR Design Reviews to provide assessment and Independent support, and ensure high design standards • Expert at both national and local levels. David • Multidisciplinary Recently a number of announcements have Tittle from the Design Network and Made, • Accountable been made in the built environment press and David Waterhouse from Design Council • Transparent about the appointment of design review CABE recently addressed the House of Lords • Proportionate groups tasked with improving the quality of Select Committee on the Built Environment • Timely high profile development proposals. The last to discuss how effective design reviews are. • Advisory were Design Council CABE, appointed to The conclusion was that more schemes • Objective set up and manage a Planning, Landscape, need to be reviewed at an earlier stage in • Accessible Architecture, Conservation and Engineering the design process. • Review Group (PLACE) for the Oak and Park Design reviews can sometimes be seen I have the benefit of currently sitting on the Royal Development Corporation. as a negative process. In the past David London Borough of Wandsworth Design Design Reviews originated in England Tittle has reflected on how design review Review Panel and enjoy the process of sup- in 1924 with the Royal Fine Art Commission originated from the old gentlemen’s club porting and encouraging good design. It reviewing building proposals.
  • The Local Government Boundary Commission for England Electoral Review of Mid Suffolk

    The Local Government Boundary Commission for England Electoral Review of Mid Suffolk

    SHEET 1, MAP 1 THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW OF MID SUFFOLK Final recommendations for ward boundaries in the district of Mid Suffolk August 2018 MENDHAM Sheet 1 of 1 CP Boundary alignment and names shown on the mapping background WEYBREAD may not be up to date. They may differ from the latest boundary information CP applied as part of this review. METFIELD CP This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Keeper of Public Records © Crown copyright and database right. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and database right. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2018. FRESSINGFIELD PALGRAVE WORTHAM SYLEHAM CP CP REDGRAVE CP STUSTON CP CP BROME AND FRESSINGFIELD HINDERCLAY WINGFIELD OAKLEY CP CP KEY TO PARISH WARDS CP CP THRANDESTON STOWMARKET CP CP A CHILTON NORTH RICKINGHALL HOXNE B CHILTON SOUTH CP C COMBS FORD BOTESDALE D ST PETER'S NORTH CP BURGATE RICKINGHALL E ST PETER'S SOUTH CP INFERIOR CP F STOW THORNEY MELLIS CP STRADBROKE YAXLEY CP CP WATTISFIELD RICKINGHALL CP SUPERIOR CP PALGRAVE EYE DENHAM CP GISLINGHAM CP THORNHAM PARVA CP EYE STRADBROKE & LAXFIELD HORHAM CP LAXFIELD CP GISLINGHAM BRAISEWORTH WILBY CP CP CP THORNHAM WALSHAM-LE-WILLOWS MAGNA CP CP OCCOLD CP REDLINGFIELD CP ATHELINGTON WALSHAM-LE-WILLOWS CP STOKE ASH CP HOXNE & FINNINGHAM WORLINGWORTH BRUNDISH LANGHAM CP CP CP WESTHORPE CP SOUTHOLT BADWELL CP WORLINGWORTH ASH CP CP STOWLANGTOFT WICKHAM CP SKEITH CP RISHANGLES THORNDON CP