DOCSLIB.ORG

Pr Roposa Req Al Due Quest F Rfp #: Date/ 3: for Pr 2503-1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pr Roposa Req Al Due Quest F Rfp #: Date/ 3: for Pr 2503-1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES MID‐BARATARIA SEDIMENT DIVERSION THIRD‐PARTY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT RFP #: 2503‐16‐23 PROPOSAL DUE DATE/TIME: NOVEMBER 16, 2016 3:00PM State of Louisiana COASTAL PROTECTION AND RESTORRATION AUTHORITY October 12, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I. ADMINISTRATIVE AND GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.1 Description and Location ...................................................................................................... 4 1.1.2 Instructions by CEMVN ......................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Definitions ..................................................................................................................................... 5‐6 1.3 Schedule of Events ........................................................................................................................ 6‐7 1.3.1 Period of Agreement………………………………………………………………………..……………………………….. 7 1.3.2 Blackout Period……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ... 7 1.4 Proposal Submission ..................................................................................................................... 7‐8 1.5 Acceptance of Proposal Content ..................................................................................................... 8 1.6 Proposal Format ......................................................................................................................... .8‐15 1.6.1 Number of Copies of Proposal ............................................................................................ 16 1.6.2 Legibility/Clarity .................................................................................................................. 17 1.7 Confidential Information, Trade Secrets and Proprietary Information ......................................... 17 1.8 Pre‐Proposal Conference ............................................................................................................... 17 1.8.1 Proposer Inquiries ............................................................................................................... 18 1.9 Errors and Omissions in Proposal .................................................................................................. 18 1.10 Changes, Addenda, Withdrawals ................................................................................................... 18 1.11 Withdrawal of Proposal ................................................................................................................. 18 1.12 Waiver of Administrative Informalities .......................................................................................... 18 1.13 Proposal Rejection/RFP Cancellation ............................................................................................. 18 1.14 Ownership of Proposal ................................................................................................................... 19 1.15 Cost of Offer Preparation ............................................................................................................... 19 1.16 Determination of Responsibility .................................................................................................... 19 1.17 Prime Contractor Responsibility withe us of Subcontractors ........................................................ 19 1.18 Evaluation ...................................................................................................................................... 19 1.19 Oral Discussion/Presentations ....................................................................................................... 20 1.20 Selection and Notice of Intent to Award ....................................................................................... 20 1.21 Contract Award and Execution ...................................................................................................... 20 1.22 Right to Prohibit Award ................................................................................................................. 21 1.23 Payment ......................................................................................................................................... 21 1.24 Assignment .................................................................................................................................... 21 1.25 Audit of Records ............................................................................................................................. 21 1.26 Records Ownership ........................................................................................................................ 21 1.27 Entire Agreement/Order of Precedence ........................................................................................ 21 1.28 Substitution of Personnel .............................................................................................................. 22 1.29 Governing Law ............................................................................................................................... 22 1.30 Claims or Controversies ................................................................................................................. 22 1.31 Code of Ethics ................................................................................................................................ 22 1.32 Corporate Requirements ............................................................................................................... 22 1.33 Indemnification & Limitation of Liability………………………………………………………………………….. ... 22‐23 1 PART II. EVALUATION 2.1 Firm Experience ........................................................................................................................ 24‐25 2.2 Experience of Personnel ................................................................................................................ 25 2.3 Approach and Methodology .......................................................................................................... 25 2.4 Veteran‐Owned and Service‐Connected Disabled Veteran‐Owned Small Entrepreneurships (Veteran Initiative) and Louisiana Initiative for Small .................................... 26 Entrepreneurships (Hudson Initiative) Programs Participation 2.5 Cost Evaluation .............................................................................................................................. 26 ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT 1: DOCUMENT MATRIX ................................................................................................. 27‐33 ATTACHMENT 2: CERTIFICATION STATEMENT .............................................................................. …….34‐35 ATTACHMENT 3: SAMPLE CONTRACT ................................................................................................... 36‐50 ATTACHMENT 4: PROPOSER (FIRM) QUALIFICATIONS FORM .............................................................. 51‐52 ATTACHMENT 5: MINIMUM PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS FORM ...................................................... 53‐60 ATTACHMENT 6: SCOPE OF WORK ..................................................................................................... 61‐125 ATTACHMENT 7: REQUIRED RATE SCHEDULE ................................................................................... 127‐128 2 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES THIRD PARTY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT MID‐BARATARIA SEDIMENT DIVERSION PART I: ADMINISTRATIVE AND GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 Background The Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority Board of Louisiana, through the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority (“CPRA”), has submitted a Joint Permit Application for Department of the Army (“DA”) permits under the provisions of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) (hereinafter “Section 404”), and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899, as amended (33 U.S.C. 403) (“Section 10”) and will also submit a permission request under Section 14 (33 U.S.C. 408) (Section 408) of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“USACE”), at the New Orleans District (“CEMVN”) for CPRA’s proposed Mid‐Barataria Sediment Diversion Project (“MBSD Project” or “Project”). An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared to disclose and analyze the significant environmental impacts of the Project as required under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in accordance with the Council on Environmental Quality’s (CEQ) regulations found in 40 CFR Parts 1500‐ 1508. This EIS will address the Public Interest Review requirements of 33 CFR Parts 320‐332 including 33 CFR Part 325, Appendix B, 33 U.S.C. 408 and 40 CFR Part 230 (Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines), so that the EIS, when completed, will provide information required for an informed decision on the DA permit application and Section 408 permission request. Any additional information required for the Section 408 permission request beyond the completed final EIS will not be performed by the selected third party contractor. CEMVN filed a Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS which was published in the Federal Register in accordance with 40 C.F.R. § 1507.3(e) and 33 C.F.R. § 230, Appendix C on October 4, 2013. In 1999, USACE Headquarters issued guidance
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Profile Publisher Copy 2009
    The advantages of doing business in Jefferson Parish are numerous. An educated workforce, excellent healthcare and proximity to several distinguished colleges and universities are just some of the benefits of living, working and doing business in Jefferson Parish. Proximity to the Gulf of Mexico and Mississippi River and to major highways and rail lines give Jefferson Parish a strategic advantage in terms of ac- Lucien Gunter cessibility into the parish, to the rest of the nation and beyond our JEDCO Executive Director borders. Jefferson Parish continues to lead the state in population and economic viability. Moreover, the parish functions as the region’s economic engine, steering its economy and redevelopment. As further evidence of Jefferson’s positive business climate, over 7,000 new businesses have been added to the parish’s business base since 2006 totaling over 36,000 businesses currently operat- ing within the parish. To enhance Jefferson’s already thriving business climate, JEDCO is currently undertaking ma- jor economic development initiatives -- the development of the Churchill Technology & Busi- ness Park and the Jefferson EDGE 2020. Located near the Huey P. Long Bridge and the Tour- nament Players Club golf course on the west bank of Jefferson Parish, the Park’s 500 acres will be anchored by the Patrick F. Taylor Science & Technology School, the Technology Incubator, JEDCO’s administrative offices and a conference center, and will be able to accommodate a va- riety of uses. The Jefferson EDGE 2020, the parish’s economic development strategic plan, now includes implementation strategies needed to improve the quality of life in Jefferson Parish and to ensure the parish’s continued prosperity.
    [Show full text]
  • Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana
    Geotechnical Data Report for 30% Design Mid Barataria Diversion Project (BA-153) Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana for HDR Engineering, Inc. January 24, 2014 DRAFT Earth Science + Technology Geotechnical Data Report for 30% Design Mid Barataria Diversion (BA-153) Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana for HDR Engineering, Inc. January 24, 2014 DRAFT 11955 Lakeland Park Boulevard, Suite 100 Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70809 225.293.2460 "Confidential Information; Privileged & Confidential Work Product" Geotechnical Data Report for 30% Design Mid Barataria Diversion Project (BA-153) Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana LDNR Contract No. 2503-13-59, Task No. 3 File No. 18274-001-00 January 24, 2014 Prepared for: HDR Engineering, Inc. 201 Rue Iberville, Suite 115 Lafayette, Louisiana Attention: Mark Stanley, PE, GE Senior Technical Advisor - Geotechnical Prepared by: GeoEngineers, Inc. 11955 Lakeland Park Boulevard, Suite 100 Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70809 225.293.2460 Michelle L. Ramos, PE Senior Geotechnical Engineer DRAFT Venu Tammineni, PE, LEED AP Geotechnical Engineer David S. Eley, PE Principal Charles L. Eustis, PE Principal MLR:VT:DSE:CLE:tlm Disclaimer: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and/or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. Copyright© 2014 by GeoEngineers, Inc. All rights reserved. "Confidential Information; Privileged & Confidential Work Product"
    [Show full text]
  • 06-11-20 Port and Council Meeting Introductions
    R E S O L U T I O N NO. 20-_ The following Resolution was offered by Commissioner Blink who moved its adoption: 1 A Resolution approving and authorizing Richie Blink, Port Chairman; Maynard J. 2 Sanders, Port Executive Director; and Chambrel Riley-Williams, Port Director of 3 Finance to execute a Louisiana Compliance Questionnaire to Camnetar and 4 Company, CPA’s; and other wise to provide with respect thereto. 5 6 WHEREAS, in connection with the audit of financial statements as of December 31, 2019, the 7 Office of the Legislative Auditor of the state of Louisiana has requested Plaquemines Port, 8 Harbor & Terminal District complete and adopt a Louisiana Compliance Questionnaire; and 9 10 WHEREAS, the Port Administration has assured the Parish Council as the governing authority 11 of the Plaquemines Port, Harbor & Terminal District that the Louisiana Compliance 12 Questionnaire has been completed in accordance with law and that all answers are true and 13 correct to the best of its belief and knowledge; 14 15 NOW, THEREFORE: 16 17 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLAQUEMINES PARISH COUNCIL AS THE SOLE 18 GOVERNING OF THE PLAQUEMINES PORT, HARBOR AND TERMINAL DISTRICT 19 THAT it herby approves and authorizes Richie Blink, Port Chairman; Maynard J. Sanders, Port 20 Executive Director; and Chambrel Riley, Port Director of Finance; to execute a Louisiana 21 Compliance Questionnaire to Camnetar & Co., CPA’s, in connection with the audit of financial 22 statements as of December 31, 2019, and for the year then ended. 23 24 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE PLAQUEMINES PARISH COUNCIL THAT the 25 Secretary of this Council is hereby authorized and directed to immediately certify and release 26 this Resolution and that Port employees and officials are authorized to carry out the purposes of 27 this Resolution, both without further reading and approval by the Plaquemines Parish Council.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jefferson EDGE 2010
    The Jefferson EDGE 2010: Road to Recovery Including a Short-Term Plan for Business in association with and Economic Recovery The University of New Orleans Center for Economic Development NOVEMber 1, 2005 TTHHEE JJEEFFFFEERRSSOONN EEDDGGEE 22001100:: Executive Summar RROOAADD TTOO RREECCOOVVEERRYY On August 25th, 2005, the Jefferson Parish In the face of these economic aftershocks, Economic Development Commission JEDCO responded swiftly and decisively to (JEDCO) Board of Commissioners voted to assist businesses affected by the hurricanes approve the five year update to The and to craft a comprehensive response to Jefferson EDGE economic development their devastation. On October 5th, 2005, plan. This revised and updated roadmap for JEDCO organized a one-day retreat at which economic development in Jefferson Parish, business leaders, community leaders, Parish entitled The Jefferson EDGE 2010, was the officials, and economic development experts culmination of nearly a year’s worth of identified critical issues facing the research, community outreach, and strategic economies of the Parish and the New economic development planning. Orleans region in the near term. Subsequently, the assembled planning group Less than a week later, the overall vision outlined a series of action items to be and the specific goals, objectives, and undertaken in order to facilitate economic strategies that emerged from this recovery. In late September and October, comprehensive planning process were cast JEDCO, the Jefferson Chamber and the into doubt by one of the largest natural Jefferson Business Council convened four disasters in the history of the United States. Jefferson Back to Business forums at which As the level of devastation wrought by time business owners were surveyed and Hurricane Katrina became apparent, it their needs assessed.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.2.2. New Orleans to Venice
    3.2.2. New Orleans to Venice 3.2.2.1. General Description The project is located along the east bank of the Mississippi River from Phoenix, LA, (approximately 28 miles southeast of New Orleans) to Bohemia, LA, and along the west bank of the river from St. Jude, LA (approximately 39 miles southeast of New Orleans), to the vicinity of Venice, LA. Project Purpose. The project will provide protection from hurricane tidal overflow for 100-year frequency storms. The protected area encompasses approximately 75 percent of the population and 75 percent of the improved lands in the lower Mississippi River delta region. Project Features. The project consists of the following: West Bank St. Jude to City Price - 3 miles of enlarged back levees from St. Jude to City Price Reach A - 13 miles of enlarged back levees from City Price to Tropical Bend and two 54-in. flap-gated culverts. Reach B1 – 12 miles of enlarged back levees from Tropical Bend to Fort Jackson and a floodgate at Empire. Reach B2 – 9 miles of enlarged back levees from Fort Jackson to Venice. West Bank River Levee (WBRL) – 34 miles of enlarged west bank Mississippi River levees from City Price to Venice. East Bank Reach C – 16 miles of enlarged back levees from Phoenix to Bohemia and 10 flap-gated culverts. Pre-Katrina Conditions. St. Jude to City Price Pre-Katrina Status • Construction in this area started in 1993. Before Hurricane Katrina, the one first enlarge- ment levee construction contract was completed in this area. Remaining work in this area consists of a second enlargement levee contract.
    [Show full text]
  • LA Inks Its First Public-Private Partnership Deal
    Louisiana inks its first public-private partnership deal By Shelly Sigo Published January 08 2020, 11:02am EST Louisiana signed off on the state’s first transportation project using a public- private partnership, after opposition to tolls in Plaquemines Parish nearly derailed it. The state signed a comprehensive agreement with Plenary Infrastructure Belle Chasse LLC to build the $162 million Belle Chasse Bridge and Tunnel Replacement Project Dec. 20, according to state officials. “This is a major accomplishment in that we are utilizing tools never before used in Louisiana," Gov. John Bel Edwards said. Southwest Louisiana Economic Development Alliance The agreement includes a 30-year maintenance and operations component after construction is completed on a fixed, four-lane bridge with a 73-foot-high vertical clearance over the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway on Louisiana Highway 23. “At the beginning of my administration, I committed to being innovative in delivering transportation infrastructure and using every tool at our disposal to ensure Louisiana was leading on infrastructure,” said Gov. John Bel Edwards. “This is a major accomplishment in that we are utilizing tools never before used in Louisiana, specifically a public-private partnership, coupled with Garvee bonds and an INFRA grant awarded to us by the Trump administration," he added. Edwards, a Democrat, will be inaugurated Monday for his second term, secured in a narrow runoff win over Republican challenger Eddie Rispone in November. Although Edwards faces GOP supermajorities in both chambers that are expected to push back against his agenda, particularly on the state budget, the Belle Chasse project received wide support from both parties because it implements the use of P3s and grant anticipation revenue vehicle bond financing with tolls as part of the state's new strategy to fund major road and bridge projects around the state.
    [Show full text]
  • LA Pursues State's First P3 for Bridge, Tunnel Replacement
    Louisiana uses first P3 to finance bridge and tunnel replacement By Shelly Sigo Published May 29 2019, 1:45pm EDT Cash-strapped Louisiana is pursuing its first public-private partnership to finance the replacement of the Judge Perez Bridge and an adjacent tunnel in the Plaquemines Parish town of Belle Chasse. Tolls will be imposed as part of the P3 that will design, build, finance, operate, and maintain a new $148 million, fixed-span, four-lane bridge, because the state can't afford to pay for the replacement project across the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway on Louisiana Highway 23, about eight miles northwest of central New Orleans. The Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development has received one proposal from a joint venture interested in the P3, although the name of consortium hasn’t been released publicly. On Thursday, the Legislature’s Joint Committee on Highway, Transportation and Public Works will review the project with the DOTD, including proposed bridge toll rates and the length of the concession agreement. The project, located in the southeastern-most parish of the state, has seen pushback from local residents objecting to the use of tolls. Sen. Troy Carter, D-New Orleans, said infrastructure like the Belle Chasse bridge replacement requires additional revenue to compliment other sources of funding obtained by the state. “It is important to recognize tolling may be a viable option to move this project forward,” Carter said. “This P3 project can be an example for other projects across Louisiana that we alone cannot afford to build.” The project’s construction cost, including purchase of right of way, utility relocation, professional services and a 10% contingency, is estimated at about $148 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Coast 2050: Toward a Sustainable Coastal Louisiana, the Appendices
    Coast 2050: Toward a Sustainable Coastal Louisiana, The Appendices Appendix D & Region 2 Supplemental Information This document is one of three that outline a jointly developed, Federal/State/Local, plan to address Louisiana’s massive coastal land loss problem and provide for a sustainable coastal ecosystem by the year 2050. These three documents are: ! Coast 2050: Toward a Sustainable Coastal Louisiana, ! Coast 2050: Toward a Sustainable Coastal Louisiana, An Executive Summary, ! Coast 2050: Toward a Sustainable Coastal Louisiana, The Appendices. Suggested citation: Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Conservation and Restoration Task Force and the Wetlands Conservation and Restoration Authority. 1999. Coast 2050: Toward a Sustainable Coastal Louisiana, The Appendices. Appendix D—Region 2 Supplemental Information. Louisiana Department of Natural Resources. Baton Rouge, La. Cover: “Pelican Sunset” © photograph by C.C. Lockwood, P.O. Box 14876, Baton Rouge, La. 70898. For additional information on coastal restoration in Louisiana: www.lacoast.gov or www.savelawetlands.org. Coast 2050: Toward a Sustainable Coastal Louisiana, The Appendices Appendix D—Region 2 Supplemental Information report of the Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Conservation and Restoration Task Force and the Wetlands Conservation and Restoration Authority Louisiana Department of Natural Resources Baton Rouge, La. 1999 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In addition to those named in the various attributions throughout this Appendix, a number of people played key roles in bringing this document together in its current form. This included editing, table development, writing explanatory and transitional text, and general formatting. These people were: Honora Buras, Ken Duffy, Bill Good, Cathy Grouchy, Bren Haase, Bryan Piazza, Phil Pittman, Jon Porthouse, Diane Smith, and Cynthia Taylor.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Isaac Report
    Hurricane Isaac August 21-30, 2012 Report Objectives Despite the fact that Hurricane Isaac was upgraded to a Category 1 hurricane on the Saffir- Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale before landfall, its large wind field contributed to significant storm surge. As the area works to recover from the storm and damage is assessed, it is important to relate the damage to the storm conditions that actually occurred in the areas affected. The objective of this report is to provide IBHS member companies with a detailed summary of wind, storm surge and rainfall data collected as the storm struck the coast and to provide links to other publicly available analyses. IBHS hopes his report will help its member companies understand the storm effects in areas where they have experienced losses. Continued research to understand the complex relationship between peak winds, storm surge, and rainfall, and to investigate methods of disseminating severe weather information to decision-makers during pre-storm preparations will lead to a narrowing of the uncertainty gap in catastrophe modeling. Introduction Hurricane Isaac was the first hurricane to make landfall in the continental United States in 2012, and the first since Hurricane Irene in September 2011. Isaac became a Category 1 hurricane on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale shortly before it made landfall near the mouth of the Mississippi River in southeastern Louisiana. This document summarizes the evolution of Isaac, the primary hazards, and their impacts at landfall along the northern Gulf Coast. Available data from various observation systems were compiled to provide a summary of wind including Texas Tech University Hurricane Research Team (TTUHRT) research platforms, storm surge, and rainfall measurements.
    [Show full text]
  • 1Of2signedsealedspecs.Pdf
    TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Pages Included Project Title Page 1 Table of Contents 5 List of Drawings 2 Procurement Requirements Advertisement for Bids 2 Instruction for Procurement Instructions to Bidders 8 Procurement Forms and Supplements Louisiana Uniform Public Works Bid Form 3 Bid Security Form 1 Attestations 2 Contracting Requirements Example Contract Between Owner & Contractor & Performance & Payment Bond & Affidavit 5 SECTION TITLE ............................................................................................................................. PAGE NO. PART I GENERAL PROVISIONS ............................................................................................................. 1 GP-1 DEFINITION OF TERMS .............................................................................................................. 1 GP-2 BID REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................................. 4 GP-3 AVAILABILITY OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ............................................................... 4 GP-4 LAWS, REGULATIONS, STANDARDS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND CODES ................................................................................................................................. 4 GP-5 PRE-BID CONFERENCE AND SITE VISIT ................................................................................ 5 GP-6 NOTICE OF AWARD ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Zone Management Program Update
    *** FINAL *** COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE TO THE THE PLAQUEMINES PARISH COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PLAQUEMINES PARISH DEPARTMENT OF COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE/ PLAQUEMINES PARISH PROJECT NO. F12AF70162 EVANS-GRAVES ENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT NO. 2011-21-770 Prepared by: EVANS-GRAVES ENGINEERS, INC. In Association with GCR, INC. One Galleria Boulevard Suite 1520 Metairie, LA 70001 (504) 836-8190 September 2013 Table of Contents Title Page ............................................................................................................................. i List of Figures .................................................................................................................... xi List of Tables .................................................................................................................... xii Chapter 1. Summary of Local Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Program .................. 1-1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1-1 Environmental and Socio-economic Setting ........................................................ 1-3 Plaquemines Parish Strategic Implementation Plan ............................................ 1-8 Coastal Master Plan ........................................................................................... 1-11 Master Plan’s approval in 2012 ......................................................................... 1-12 Resource User Conflicts ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]