Population & Demographics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Population & Demographics APPENDIX Population & APPENDIX: POPULATION & Demographics DEMOGRAPHICS The most important resource available to a community is its people. While the City is often thought of as a single entity, it is a dynamic network of established and new neighborhoods, employment centers, commercial areas, and school districts that are fundamental affected by population and demographic changes. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS Population Population change is the result of two factors: natural increase (the difference between births and deaths) and net migration (the change in people moving to/from the community). Most local population growth typically occurs from individuals and families moving to a community, usually for economic opportunity or quality of life reasons. The City’s population has undergone several phases throughout its history. The City experienced steady – and in some decades dramatic – growth through the 19th and early 20th centuries, reaching its peak population of 77,634 residents in 1950. The subsequent three decades were marked by a sharp decline in population. This decline is consistent with several national trends that destabilized many U.S. cities. These include a rapid post World War II housing boom and suburbanization of outlying, formerly rural communities as well as large-scale urban renewal projects that reconfigured and sometimes removed existing urban neighborhoods. In the past three decades, however, the City’s population has stabilized and appears to be entering a new phase of renewed growth. DEMOGRAPHIC HIGHLIGHTS • Portland is the largest city in Maine, with a 2010 population of 66,194 and a 2015 estimate by the US Census Bureau of 66,681 (nearly double that of Lewiston, the state’s second largest City). • Between 2000 and 2010, Portland’s population increased by 1,945 residents (a growth rate of 3%). • Portland’s current population is roughly 11,000 residents shy of the City’s record high of 77,634 residents in 1950. • As the region’s major employment center, Portland’s daytime population is estimated to exceed 96,000 people. • Millennials (20-29) and Gen Xers (30-39) comprise the largest share of Portland’s population, while Baby Boomers (50-69) are the fastest growing age group. • Portland’s population is diversifying. Since 2000, the number of foreign born residents has nearly doubled (from 4,895 in 2000 to a current estimate of 8,767). An estimated 11% of Portland residents are now foreign born. • Portland’s population is increasingly well educated. When compared to Cumberland County and the State, a higher proportion of Portland’s residents have obtained advanced degrees (45% of Portland residents over 25 years have bachelor or graduate degrees). PORTLAND'S PLAN | 88 APPENDIX: POPULATION & DEMOGRAPHICS City Snapshot (2000-2010) 2000 2010 % Change Total Population 64,249 66,194 3% Female Population 33,496 33,888 1% Male Population 30,753 32,306 5% Median Age 35.7 36.7 3% Total Housing Units 31,862 33,836 6% Owner-occupied 12,617 13,124 4% Renter occupied 17,097 17,601 3% Vacant 2,148 3,111 45% Total Households 29,714 30,725 3% Family Households 13,547 13,324 -2% Non-Family Households 16,167 17,401 8% Average Household Size 2.08 2.07 0% Average Family Size 2.89 2.88 0% Median Household Income $35,650 $45,865 2%* *Adjusted for Inflation Historic Population Growth (1800-2014) 77,634 80,000 66,317 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 Total Population Total 30,000 20,000 10,000 – 1800 1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 *2010-2014 ACS 5-year estimate PORTLAND'S PLAN | 89 APPENDIX: POPULATION & DEMOGRAPHICS Regional Population Trends Much of the region’s growth since 1950 has occurred in the suburban and rural communities of Cumberland County. Between 2000 and 2010, for example, Cumberland County grew by a total of 16,062 residents. Of this growth, Portland captured 12%, or 1,945 new residents. Percent Share of Cumberland County Growth (2000-2010) 25% – All Other Communities 12% – Portland 10% – South Portland 08% – Westbrook 16,062 NEW RESIDENT S 12% – Scarborough 13% – Windham 14% – Gorham 05% – Falmouth While growth in the City is an encouraging trend, Portland’s recent growth has generally been slow. In the period from 2000-2010, outlying neighbors, several of which are three to four times smaller, captured a disproportionately larger share of the County’s growth. In fact, the three fastest growing communities in Maine, in terms of net population growth, were Windham, Gorham, and Scarborough. Each community added roughly 2,000 residents from 2000 to 2010. When compared to County and State trends, Portland's population growth generally lags behind. Portland's 0% and 3% growth rates over the past two decades trailed behind both the County's (9% and 6%) and State's (4% and 5%) for the same time periods. Population Growth Comparison: Portland, Neighboring Communities, Cumberland County, and Maine (1980-2014) % Increase % Increase 1980 1990 2000 2010 2014* (1990-2000) (2000-2010) Portland 61,572 64,358 64,249 66,194 66,317 0% 3% South Portland 22,712 23,163 23,376 25,002 25,154 1% 7% Westbrook 14,976 16,121 16,142 17,494 17,662 0% 8% Scarborough 11,347 12,518 16,970 18,919 19,209 36% 11% Windham 11,282 13,020 14,904 17,001 17,300 14% 14% Gorham 10,101 11,856 14,141 16,381 16,677 19% 16% Cumberland County 215,789 243,135 265,612 281,674 284,351 9% 6% Maine 1,119,971 1,222,000 1,266,848 1,328,361 1,328,535 4% 5% 2010-2014 ACS 5-year estimate PORTLAND'S PLAN | 90 APPENDIX: POPULATION & DEMOGRAPHICS In the 1920s, Portland’s population comprised more than half (56%) of Cumberland County’s population, and 9% of Maine’s population. Today, these figures are considerably smaller. As of the 2014 ACS 5-Year Estimate, Portland’s population represented 23% of the County’s population, and 5% of the State’s population. City of Portland’s Population as a Percent of County/State Population (1800-2000) 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% - 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 Portland as a Percent of County Population Portland as a Percent of State Population Despite the City’s modest growth over the past few decades, a number of signs point to a possible resurgence in population now and in the years to come. Many of the urban areas in the greater Portland region have stopped losing population and are now beginning to grow again; in addition to Portland, the cities of Westbrook, South Portland, Biddeford, and Saco all benefited from renewed growth during the 2000s, despite tepid growth during the 1990s. It seems possible the region’s urban areas are on the cusp of an emerging trend back towards city life. This trend, which has been observed in urban areas throughout the country, is widely attributed to the convergence of two distinct generations: the “Millennials” and the “Baby Boomers.” It is thought the Millennials are moving to cities for job opportunities, increased social interaction, and the convenience of not having to own an automobile, while Baby Boomers are gravitating towards cities for many of the same reasons, as well as the desire to downsize housing or retire in a more walkable neighborhood closer to amenities. PORTLAND'S PLAN | 91 APPENDIX: POPULATION & DEMOGRAPHICS Population Density In the City, density rates range from 400+ people per acre in a few select locations (i.e., assisted living facility, homeless shelter, etc.) to 0-5 people per acre in outlying census blocks. As might be expected, Portland’s peninsula, overall, has the highest rates of people per acre. Additionally, many of the census blocks in neighborhoods adjacent to major corridors (Route 25, Route 302, and Route 26/100) also have higher population densities. Portland’s Population Density (2010) PORTLAND'S PLAN | 92 APPENDIX: POPULATION & DEMOGRAPHICS Population Change Census tracts are larger than census blocks and are the approximate size of neighborhoods. Since census tract boundaries in Portland changed only slightly from 2000 to 2010, it is possible to see which neighborhood areas gained or lost populations over the decade. The census tracts that experienced the most growth between 2000 and 2010 were: • Census tracts 21.01 & 22 (North Deering), which gained 200 and 522 people respectively; • Census tract 21.02 (Riverside), which gained 627 people; • Census tract 20.02 (Stroudwater/Libbytown), which gained 516 people; • Census tract 6 (Parkside), which gained 540 people. The census tracts that experienced the sharpest declines in population were: • Census tract 3 (Downtown), which lost 500 people; and • Census Tract 11 (West End), which lost 231 people. Portland’s Population Change (2000-2010*) *This map shows census tracts only and is not a depiction of definitive neighborhood boundaries. PORTLAND'S PLAN | 93 APPENDIX: POPULATION & DEMOGRAPHICS On the peninsula, the majority of new growth occurred in the vicinity of the Parkside, East Bayside, and India Street neighborhoods, while the eastern side of the peninsula, including downtown, the West End, and a portion of the East End, generally lost population. Off the peninsula, most population growth occurred in the outlying census tracts, in the vicinity of North Deering, Riverside, and Stroudwater/Libbytown. The census tracts that lost population, including Deering Center, Rosemont, and Back Cove, were more centrally located. Losses were relatively modest. Daytime & Seasonal Population Change As the State’s largest city and urban center for Cumberland County, Portland is home to a large number of employers and jobs. The daily influx of workers means the City’s daytime population is often substantially higher than its nighttime population, comprised mainly of residents.
Recommended publications
  • View Group Charter Coach Bus Parking
    Greater Portland 22 MOTOR COACHSaco St Driverʼs Guide25 to Greater Portland Spring St Westbrook 302 Map Parking Key Cummings Rd Riverside St 114 Running Hill Rd Maine Turnpike 95 Exit Warren Av 45 95 Maine Mall Rd e Johnson Rd WestbrookFore Rive St r Capisic St URP e Portland Sanctuary Auburn St The Av University of MOTOR COACH- UNRESTRICTED PARKING stern International Stevens Ave Maine Mall We Jetport Woodfords St New England Allen Ave FRIENDLY STREETS FOR ALL VEHICLES Payne Rd Foden Rd Gorham Rd e WEST COMMERCIAL ST.Falmouth Mussey Rd Jetport Plaza Brighton Ave Reed St Kaplan Stevens Av Dartmouth St Forest Ave Canco St Clarks Pond Rd University St. John St MARGINAL WAY Congress St Ocean Ave Ave Vannah St Plowman St. to Cove St. EXIT SP Falmouth St NORTH 5 Deering DO EXIT BOUND Baxter Blvd 9 4 ONLY University of Payson 295 Hadlock Southern Maine Park Wash P Field EXIT Portland Deering Oaks Bedford St 6A i Veterans Bridge Park n SDO Expo Back Cove gt Park Avenue o 295 n Ave Lincoln St Post Fore River Parkway Veranda St Evans St Office Vaughn St t Portland St Marginal Wa SOUTH 1 S EXIT EXIT BOUND 8 Western Promenade State Cumberland Ave 7 ONLY Paris St y 295 DROP OFF Broadway COMMERCIAL ST. URP UNLIMITED TIME Spring St High St Long Wharf Danforth St Preble St PORTLAND PARKING Forest Ave Oak St Cumberland Ave Fore River DANFORTH ST. DO DO . COMMERCIAL ST. Congress St Victoria Mansion East & West of Center St. Fox St Elm St Anderson St.
    [Show full text]
  • East Bayside Neighborhood Study Prepared by the Planning Workshop, 2009 Muskie School of Public Service Community Planning & Development Program
    East Bayside Neighborhood Study Prepared by the Planning Workshop, 2009 Muskie School of Public Service Community Planning & Development Program East Bayside Neighborhood Study Planning Workshop 2009 Community Planning & Development Program, Muskie School of Public Service Community Client: East Bayside Neighborhood Organization Belinda Ray, president Ward Willis, liaison to Planning Workshop Community Partners: Kevin Donoghue, Portland City Councilor (District 1) Portland Housing Authority Mark Adelson, Assistant Director City of Portland Public Services Mike Bobinsky, Director Franklin Arterial Study Group Marcos Miller, Co-Chair Planning Workshop 2009: Alan Holt, Adjunct Professor Cotton Estes, Teaching Assistant Jessa Berna, Paul Connair, Sophie DeMaio, Shelley Hodges, Emily Reinholt, & William Walker, students. Muskie School of Public Service P.O. Box 9300, Portland, Maine 04104-9300 (207) 780-4480, FAX (207) 780-4549, TTY (207) 780-5646 www.muskie.usm.maine.edu Spring 2009 Since its establishment in 2002, the Planning Workshop has been an annual course offering in the Muskie’s Community Planning and Development program that provides students with an opportunity to work directly with a client on a community planning issue. The students essentially form a consulting group that works with a community client to identify issues and execute a work plan. The Workshop aims to provide students with an opportunity to apply their planning studies to a real world situation, as well as to offer a community service. Last fall, just about the time that I needed to find a class project for the Workshop, I wound up in a carpool with Belinda Ray, president of the East Bayside Neighborhood Organization. As we were driving upstate to canvas for a presidential campaign, a sense of hope and expectation infused our conversation as we talked about the possibility for a better country and world.
    [Show full text]
  • Trefethen: the Family and the Landing
    TRE FETHENpottung The Family and The Landing Jessie B . Trefethen Ć Ś 71 17855 1960 A ISTOR WE ESTA TH * ROUNDED 1846 OF SRB W19SCONS THE AUTHOR Miss Jessie B . Trefether lives in the Trefethen Home stead at Peaks Island wirere she was born . It is a Cape Cod house built by her great-grandfather , Henry Trefethen of House Island for his two oldest children , in 1844 . She attended the Peaks Island School and the Portland High School , and she has a B . A . degree from Mount Holyoke College . She went to the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts, Philadelphia , for three years and was awarded a Cresson Scholarship for European study and travel. She taught Art in boarding schools for girls ; and while teaching at the Knox School, Cooperstown , New York , received an appointment to the Fine Arts Department, Oberlin Col lege, Oberlin , Ohio . She is now an Associate Professor Emeritus of Oberlin College . Along with teaching and painting, she has more than usual interest in Early Ameri can Architecture , Antique Furniture , Crafts , and the Civilization that produced them . She is a ninth generation Trefethen in New England , and is a part of the tradition about which she writes . She is also a direct descendant of George Cleeves who founded Portland in 1633, and Peaks Island was a part of his domain . She has become a painter , of Maine rocks against the sea and she writes about the land where she belongs . “ The Influence ” - Monhegan Island , Maine Built by Henry Trefethen , 1826 COURTESY OF MRS. VARNUM Old Grandfather 's Clock by Made Henry Trefethen of New Castle , N .
    [Show full text]
  • May Clocktower
    NO. 4 MAY 2016 CLOCKTOWER May Edition ISSUE NO. 4 CAPSTONE UPDATE COT-9 SUSTAINABILITY DEERING HIGH ORIGINAL WHAT PROJECTS ARE FRESHMEN BUILD PRODUCTION 75 SENIORS DOING? SOLAR RECHARGING DEERING PRODUCES STATIONS FOR IPADS! THEATER WITH A MESSAGE. CLOCKTOWER During WINN, more than thirty students participated in a A partnership with the Telling Rube Goldberg Challenge. Students worked twice a week Room sparks young writers’ throughout the quarter to design simple machines with at confidence, so they too can least 6 energy transfers that would end with the ringing of a bell. For our culminating event, 5th graders from share their story! Longfellow visited the lab and served as judges as each team demonstrated their machine. !1 NO. 4 MAY 2016 CLOCKTOWER Dear Clocktower Reader, Every year the Deering faculty has the opportunity to vote to select the From Principal recipient of the Walter E. Russell award for excellence in teaching. This annual Waltz award was initiated by the University of Southern Maine to recognize a teacher who demonstrates a firm commitment to the profession, the ability to share a love for learning, an intimate involvement in the ongoing life and activities of Deering, and creative self-renewal to teaching. Mary Ann Brown was selected by her colleagues to receive the award for 2016, and I would like to share some of the comments made by her peers in support of her nomination. ‘Mary Ann has been a dedicated member of the faculty for 15 years. She is one of the first to arrive and frequently one of the last to leave the building.
    [Show full text]
  • Portland Parks Capital Improvements
    1. Parks Commission Meeting Documents: PARKS COMMISSION AGENDA 2.3.17.PDF PARKS COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES 01052017.PDF RULES OF LBC.PDF RULES OF PARKS COMMISSION REVISED 11.2014_3.PDF PARK COMMISSION 2017-02.PDF 2018-2027 PARKS CIP.PDF FRIENDS COMMUNITY PARTNERS HANDBOOK.PDF ANNUAL REPORT_2016 FINAL.PDF 1.I. Meeting Minutes Amended Documents: PARKS COMMISSION 01052017 MINUTES AMENDED.PDF 1.II. Parks Commission Meeting Minutes Documents: PARKS COMMISSION 02022017.PDF Commission Members: Carol Hutchins, Craig Lapine, Cynthia Loebenstein, Diane Davison, Chair, Dory Waxman, Vice Chair, Jaime Parker, Meri Lowry, Michael Mertaugh, Nathan Robbins, Steve Morgenstein, Travis Wagner and Councilor Belinda Ray Parks Commission Agenda February 2, 2017 5 PM City Hall ~ 389 Congress Street ~ Room 24 City of Portland Commissions are not required to take public comment under FOAA and are Ordinance is silent regarding the duties of the Commission. The Commission has the discretion to not allow or allow public comment during its meetings, including the authority to limit the duration of comments. Since the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council, public comment is available at that level. I. General Citizen Comment Period (5 min) II. Agenda Items A. Acceptance of Meeting Minutes- January 5, 2016 (3 min) B. New Business (15 min) Allow public comment on action items Establish a PC “Recruitment Committee” Amend PC rules to elect PC officers (Chair/Vice Chair) in June Select date for SPS C. Communications/Updates (20 min) Councilor Ray – Fort Sumner update Ethan – written report provided for preview o FY18 – 10 year CIP process update D. Unfinished Committee Business (20 min) Park Initiatives - Chair – Steve (no report) Finance Committee Chair – Michael Annual Report/Inventory Committee Chair – Travis (no report) Strategic Planning Session; discuss agenda draft & select date PC-LB meeting with Michael Goldman E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Deering Weekly Update Please
    The Deering Weekly Update Please Tuesday November 5, 2018- edition 5 Vol 3. For Deering's Sport Schedules, visit www.deeringathletics.com ​ Date Event and Info Time Location Notes Wednesday DHS Boosters 6 -7 pm DHS room November 7 Club Mtg 219 Please join the Deering staff in congratulating English teachers Drew Pisani and Kathryn ​ ​ ​ Toppan for earning their renewal of their National Board Certification. National Board ​ ​ ​ certified teachers must undergo a rigorous series of evaluations and demonstrations of their expertise in order to maintain their certification. 1 Backpacks are a constant need ​ for DHS student community members. If you have any backpacks that you don’t need, please bring them to the front desk at DHS. They will be well used. Thank you! ***IMPORTANT HEALTH INFORMATION*** PARENTS OF SENIORS: Please provide proof of your student's meningococcal vaccine to Deering's school nurse, Deb Tanguay, by DECEMBER 1, 2018. "The state has issued new requirements for vaccinations: Two doses of MCV4 are required for students entering 12th grade, with a minimum of 8 weeks between dose one and dose two. If the first dose was administered on or after the 16th birthday, a second dose is not required. If a student entering 12th grade is 15 years of age or younger, only one dose is required. Starting in 2018-19, all students entering, advancing, or transferring into 7th grade and 12th grade in Maine public schools must have proof that they have appropriate meningococcal vaccines (MCV4) serogroups M, C, V and Y." YEARBOOK INFORMATION **Last year's Yearbooks (2018)are available for 1/2 price $35.
    [Show full text]
  • Harbor Voices : Vol 2, No 5 - Jul - Aug 2001
    Portland Public Library Portland Public Library Digital Commons Harbor Opinion/Harbor Voices, 2000 - 2001 Periodicals 7-2001 Harbor Voices : Vol 2, No 5 - Jul - Aug 2001 Jenny Ruth Yasi Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.portlandlibrary.com/peaks_ho_hv Recommended Citation Yasi, Jenny Ruth, "Harbor Voices : Vol 2, No 5 - Jul - Aug 2001" (2001). Harbor Opinion/Harbor Voices, 2000 - 2001. 15. https://digitalcommons.portlandlibrary.com/peaks_ho_hv/15 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Periodicals at Portland Public Library Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Harbor Opinion/Harbor Voices, 2000 - 2001 by an authorized administrator of Portland Public Library Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ~- u or Box V 0 ' Power boats on the dock, Peaks Island Disclaimer: All pieces published in Harbor Voices reflect the opinions and experiences of the Editorial by Jenny Ruth Yasi author of the piece only. We'd like to main­ tain a safe space where people dare to stick their necks out, and say what's on their It's a Hoax minds. We invite and welcome reader re­ sponse! As always, we ask only that writers help us maintain a courteous atmosphere, A whole lot of people are falling for a hoax. and focus on issues and not For example, r saw a guy with two kids just off Peaks Island the other day, in a big, personalities. Thanks! brightly colored speedboat. The boat was loud, deafeningly loud - it actually hurt my ears for about an hour after its several jet engines zoomed close.
    [Show full text]
  • WHO WE ARE: SEE PAGE 7 Hilary Bassett SEE PAGE 10
    SPRING 2019 n VOL. 44, NO. 2 n FREE LANDMARKS OBSERVER Historic character enriches our lives OBSERVATORY: New Visitor Experience SEE PAGE 4 THE CASE FOR MUNJOY HILL SEE PAGE 8 FLAG DAY: Friday, June 14 10 am – 7 pm WHO WE ARE: SEE PAGE 7 Hilary Bassett SEE PAGE 10 Page 8 PHOTO: RHONDA FARNHAM RHONDA PHOTO: LETTER FROM HILARY BASSETT, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ODAY, AS I DRIVE UP FORE STREET and walk you to preserve the historic character of the place we call home. around my neighborhood, Munjoy Hill, the sounds of Imagine for a moment, how different this place would be if not construction are everywhere – hammers, power tools, for Landmarks and the tireless commitment of its hundreds and yes, backhoes demolishing buildings. All over our of volunteers, funders, and preservation professionals. Historic community – whether it is Forest Avenue, Willard preservation has been the very cornerstone of making this place Beach,T transportation corridors in Falmouth, so attractive as a place to live, work, and visit. or Westbrook’s mill structures – there is pres- Thank you again for making it possible for sure that is putting greater Portland’s historic Landmarks to continue to advocate that pre- character at risk. Our historic fabric is fragile. serving and reusing historic places is sustain- Once special places are destroyed or compro- able, enriches people’s lives, and brings diverse mised, there is no turning back the clock. communities together. Portland is undergoing one of its greatest Please join me in welcoming Sarah Hansen transformations since Urban Renewal in the as the new executive director of Greater 1960s and 70s.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate, Index
    MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from electronic originals (may include minor formatting differences from printed original) RECORD INDEX – MAINE SENATE 123rd LEGISLATURE - A - ABANDONED PROPERTY Management Law Enforcement Agencies LD 1085 231, 632 ABORTION Providers Mandatory Reporters Of Sex Abuse LD 61 57, 526 Services Funds To Reimburse Eligible Women LD 1309 259, 689 Vital Statistics Published Annually LD 973 225, 604 ABUSE & NEGLECT Children Failure To Ensure School Attendance LD 454 118, 854, 871-872 (RM), 898, 981 Domestic Abuse/Sexual Assault Programs Funds LD 2289 1747-1756 (RM RC) (2), 1756 (RC) Domestic Violence Shelters Addresses Confidential LD 2271 1670, 1720, 1779 Training Criminal Justice Academy LD 1039 225, 938, 976, 1066 Victims Review Of Measures To Protect LD 1990 1323, 1730, 1763, 1861 (RM RC) Economic Recovery Loan Program LD 1796 370, 407, 415-420 (RM RC), 422-423 (RM RC) Mandated Reporters Animal Control Officers LD 584 137, 581, 610, 668 Family Violence Victim Advocates LD 2243 1518, 1776, 1810 Sexual Assault Counselor LD 2243 1518, 1776, 1810 Protection From Dating Partner Stalk/Assault Victim LD 988 226, 849, 898, 981 Sexual Assault & Domestic Violence Prevention School & Community-Based LD 1224 234, 1031 Suspicious Child Deaths Investigations & Reporters LD 2000 1324, 1784, 1861 ACCESS TO INFORMATION Adoptees Medical & Family History LD
    [Show full text]
  • Principal Fortifications of the United States (1870–1875)
    Principal Fortifications of the United States (1870–1875) uring the late 18th century and through much of the 19th century, army forts were constructed throughout the United States to defend the growing nation from a variety of threats, both perceived and real. Seventeen of these sites are depicted in a collection painted especially for Dthe U.S. Capitol by Seth Eastman. Born in 1808 in Brunswick, Maine, Eastman found expression for his artistic skills in a military career. After graduating from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, where offi­ cers-in-training were taught basic drawing and drafting techniques, Eastman was posted to forts in Wisconsin and Minnesota before returning to West Point as assistant teacher of drawing. Eastman also established himself as an accomplished landscape painter, and between 1836 and 1840, 17 of his oils were exhibited at the National Academy of Design in New York City. His election as an honorary member of the academy in 1838 further enhanced his status as an artist. Transferred to posts in Florida, Minnesota, and Texas in the 1840s, Eastman became interested in the Native Americans of these regions and made numerous sketches of the people and their customs. This experience prepared him for his next five years in Washington, D.C., where he was assigned to the commissioner of Indian Affairs and illus­ trated Henry Rowe Schoolcraft’s important six-volume Historical and Statistical Information Respecting the History, Condition, and Prospects of the Indian Tribes of the United States. During this time Eastman also assisted Captain Montgomery C. Meigs, superintendent of the Capitol Brevet Brigadier General Seth Eastman.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine Guide Training
    Maine Guide Training 2021 History of Maine Guides ● First hired guides in Maine were Abenaki people who led European explorers, military officials, traders, priests and lumbermen. ● Guiding industry emerged in late 1900s as people in more urban and industrialized regions sought wilderness for recreation ● Cornelia “Fly Rod” Crosby was first guide licensed in 1897; 1700 others were licensed that year. Maine’s Legal Definition of “Guide” Any person who receives any form of remuneration for his services in accompanying or assisting any person in the fields, forests or on the waters or ice within the jurisdiction of the State while hunting, fishing, trapping, boating, snowmobiling or camping at a primitive camping area. Sea Kayaking Guide Specialization Guides can lead paddlesports trips on the State's territorial seas and tributaries of the State up to the head of tide and out to the three mile limit. This classification includes overnight camping trips in conjunction with those sea-kayaking and paddlesports. Testing Process 1. Criminal Background Check 2. Oral Examination ■ Chart and compass work ■ Catastrophic scenario 3. Written Examination (minimum score of 70 to pass) What Maine Sea Kayak Guides CAn Do ● Lead commercial sea kayaking and SUP trips on Maine’s coastal waters ● Lead overnight camping trips associated with these trips (new as of 2005) ● Lead trips with up to 12 people per guide What Sea Kayak Guides CAN’T Do ● Lead paddling trips on inland waters (by kayak, canoe, SUP or raft) ● Take clients fishing or hunting ● Lead trips that require another type of guide license What are the qualities that you most appreciated in guides you’ve encountered? ● Wilderness Guide Association’s Definition of a Guide A trained and experienced professional with a high level of nature awareness.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places NATIONAL Registration Form REGISTER
    NFS Form 10-900 QMS Mo. 1024-0018 (Ftav. 8-86) 1701 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service SEP 1 5 1983 National Register of Historic Places NATIONAL Registration Form REGISTER This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property historic name Eastern Promenade____________________________________________ other names/site number 2. Location street & number Bounded by E. Promenade, fasrn Ray, Fnrp> JNfll not for publication city, town Port! and M vicinity state code county code zip code Q41Q1 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property I I private I building(s) Contributing Noncontributing lx~l public-local district ____ ____ buildings I I public-State site . sites I I public-Federal structure . structures I object . objects 3 ? Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously ______N/A ___________ listed in the National Register 0_____ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this [x] nomination EH request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]