DOCSLIB.ORG

Downloaded for Free from the Globethics.Net Website

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Downloaded for Free from the Globethics.Net Website Φ ISBN 978-2-88931-293-1 1 The Value of Critical Knowledge, Ethics and Education This book aims at six important conceptual tools developed by philosophers to address the meaning of ethics. The author develops each particular view in The Value of Critical Knowledge,Education Ethicsand Critical Value of The a chapter, hoping to constitute at the end a concise, interesting and easily readable whole. These concepts are: 1. Ethics and realism: elucidation of the distinc- Philosophy 1 tion between understanding and explanation – the lighthouse type of normativity. 2. Leadership, antirealism and moral psychology – the lightning rod type of normativity. 3. Bright light on self-identity and positive reciprocity – the reciprocity type of norma- tivity. 4. The virtue of generosity and its importance for inclusive education – the divine will type of normativity. 5. Ethical education as normative philosophical perspective. The Value of Critical Knowledge, The normativity of self-transformation in education. 6. Aesthetics as expression of human freedom and concern for the whole world in which we live, and which lives in Ethics and Education us. We share an artistic presence in communities of practice, and across wider human circles, and finally seek to unite in the celebration of friendship and humanity across Philosophical History Bringing Epistemic boundaries in a philosophical garden. and Critical Values to Values Ignace Haaz Ignace Haaz Since 2012, Ignace Haaz has contributed to release over 190 books on ethics, theology and philosophy as Globethics.net Publications Manager across 14 Series in 7 languages and Series Editor. As ethics online library executive, he is also developing online library collections on applied HaazIgnace ethics for Globethics.net, currently focusing in particular on education. Previously Ignace received a Doctorat ès Lettres from the University of Geneva and taught ethical theories as Doctor Assistant at the Department of Philosophy of the University of Fribourg (Switzerland). Globethics.net The Value of Critical Knowledge, Ethics and Education Philosophical History Bringing Epistemic and Critical Values to Values “Education is another sun to those who are educated” Heracleitus of Ephesus, Fragment 134. The Value of Critical Knowledge, Ethics and Education Philosophical History Bringing Epistemic and Critical Values to Values Ignace Haaz Globethics.net Philosophy Series No. 1 Globethics.net Philosophy Director: Prof. Dr. Obiora Ike, Executive Director of Globethics.net in Geneva and Professor of Ethics at the Godfrey Okoye University Enugu/Nigeria. Series editor: Dr Ignace Haaz, Managing Editor. Globethics.net Philosophy Series 1 Ignace Haaz, The Value of Critical Knowledge, Ethics and Education: Philosophical History Bringing Epistemic and Critical Values to Values Geneva: Globethics.net, 2019 ISBN 978-2-88931-292-4 (online version) ISBN 978-2-88931-293-1 (print version) © 2019 Globethics.net Assistant Editor: Samuel Davies Proofreading: Tiffany Hemecker Cover design: Michael Cagnoni Globethics.net International Secretariat 150 route de Ferney 1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland Website: www.globethics.net/publications Email: [email protected] All web links in this text have been verified as of June 2019. The electronic version of this book can be downloaded for free from the Globethics.net website: www.globethics.net. The electronic version of this book is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY- NC-ND 4.0). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. This means that Globethics.net grants the right to download and print the electronic version, to distribute and to transmit the work for free, under the following conditions: Attribution: The user must attribute the bibliographical data as mentioned above and must make clear the license terms of this work; Non- commercial. The user may not use this work for commercial purposes or sell it; No derivative works: The user may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author’s moral rights. Globethics.net retains the right to waive any of the above conditions, especially for reprint and sale in other continents and languages. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................ 9 1 Ethics and Realism: Elucidation of the Distinction between Understanding and Explanation ...................... 15 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................. 15 1.2. The Ethical Norm as a Lighthouse .............................................. 18 1.3 Kant as Precursor of Dilthey’s Comprensive Psychological Philosophy of the Mind ...................................................................... 19 1.4 Self-Understanding: Anthropological Foundation of Psychology and Psychopathology ........................................................................ 22 1.5 Conclusion .................................................................................... 26 1.6 Bibliography ................................................................................. 29 2 Leadership, Anti-realism and Moral Psychology ....... 31 2.1 Realistic Ethical Leadership, Anti-realism and the Apology of Innocence: Introduction of Ethical Normativity as a Lightning Rod ............................................................................. 31 2.2 Realism and Antirealist Leadership Based on the Unconscious Internal Drive ..................................................................................... 42 2.2.1 Irony in Innocence: Liberation from Narrow Expertise ........ 54 2.3 Genealogical Perspective: The Drive for Power as Condition for any other Passion ......................................................................... 58 2.3.1 Redefining Power as a Decent Standard .............................. 60 2.4 References ................................................................................. 111 3 The Bright Lights on Self Identity and Positive Reciprocity ....................................................................... 121 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................... 123 3.2 “Hate is to be conquered by Love”: Shared Competencies vs Integrity ........................................................................................... 132 3.2.1 Spinoza’s High Standard of Personal Values ...................... 136 3.2.2 Ethics of Sustainability: An Immanent Onto-Metaphysical Foundation .................................................................................. 138 3.3 Spinoza’s Realistic Principle of an Ethic of Competency and Sustainability: Reflecting on the Real Formal Causes ............... 139 3.3.1 The Monistic Notion of Identity Related Mutual Recognition vs the Transformative Model .................................. 143 3.3.2 Enlargement of Spinoza’s Realistic Reciprocal Interactions: the Politeness Theory............................................. 144 3.4 Conclusion ................................................................................. 145 3.5 Bibliography .............................................................................. 147 4 R. Descartes’ Virtue of Generosity and its Importance for Inclusive Education ................. 151 4.1 Exemplarity Based Education: Trusting Some Passions as Admiration or Wonder ................................................................ 151 4.2 Esteem Based Education: a not so Admirable Direction Model of Education: Generosity as a Focus ..................................... 154 4.3 Generosity Related Carthesian Corpus ...................................... 157 4.4 Conclusion ................................................................................. 166 4.5 Bibliography .............................................................................. 167 5 Ethical Education as Normative Philosophical Perspective ....................................................................... 171 5.1 Introduction ............................................................................... 171 5.2 Philosophical Models of Knowledge Acquisition Based on Capacities/Merit and the Perspective of Innate Ideas ................ 173 5.3 The Great Global Paradigm Shifts Challenging Higher Education: Cognitive and Ethical Values Acquisition and Sharing ... 187 5.4 Self-directed Individual Education as Motivating Ground for Common Good and Social Education ......................................... 191 5.5 Social Education and the Point of View of the Rights: Cultural Rights and Africa ................................................................ 194 5.5.1 Extract of the Main Definitions of Cultural Rights Regarding Education .................................................................... 197 5.5.2 Annex .................................................................................. 200 5.6 Bibliography ............................................................................... 200 6 Conclusion: The Aesthetics of a Philosophical Garden ............................................................................. 205 6.1 Garden Virtues and Garden Vices.......................................... 209 6.2 A Garden Based Space out of the Agora................................ 216 INTRODUCTION “Why should I be ethical?” is the central philosophical question we are trying to address. In order to answer, we could first clarify
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Digital Edition
    FREE August 27-September 2, 2020 • Vol. 46, No. 6 Fall Guide August 27-September 2, 2020 | Illinois Times | 1 2 | www.illinoistimes.com | August 27-September 2, 2020 OPINION Big guy, big personality, big flaws Former governor James Thompson dies DYSPEPSIANA | James Krohe Jr. James R. Thompson, the biggest (six feet six) had his virtues as a chief executive. Not until and longest (14 years in office) governor Illinois the election of JB Pritzker has Illinois seen a ever had, died on Aug. 14, 2020, in Chicago at governor of Thompson’s intelligence (although 84. His rise as a politician coincided with that Pritzker came into office with a better education of this newspaper, and to those of us working at and broader experience). He was a quick study Illinois Times in those days he was a familiar, if and he realized that legislative politics was a often exasperating, character. matter of getting things done, not striking poses. Senate President Don Harmon observed, He saved the Dana-Thomas House for the “No one enjoyed being governor more.” public and saved the governorship for Jim Edgar, Certainly, no modern governor did. Inside the whom he hand-groomed for the job. big man was a little boy with a sweet tooth Unfortunately, he never dared enough to who in January 1977 found himself in his become one of Illinois’s great governors in the own candy shop. He ate it all up – the corn mold of Lowden or Horner or Ogilvie. Maybe dogs, the applause, the press attention, the that was just because he wasn’t interested enough chauffeured rides.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type o f computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zed) Road, Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 CULTURAL METHODS OF MANIPULATING PLANT GROWTH DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Gary R.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy 1
    Philosophy 1 PHILOSOPHY VISITING FACULTY Doing philosophy means reasoning about questions that are of basic importance to the human experience—questions like, What is a good life? What is reality? Aileen Baek How are knowledge and understanding possible? What should we believe? BA, Yonsei University; MA, Yonsei University; PHD, Yonsei University What norms should govern our societies, our relationships, and our activities? Visiting Associate Professor of Philosophy; Visiting Scholar in Philosophy Philosophers critically analyze ideas and practices that often are assumed without reflection. Wesleyan’s philosophy faculty draws on multiple traditions of Alessandra Buccella inquiry, offering a wide variety of perspectives and methods for addressing these BA, Universitagrave; degli Studi di Milano; MA, Universitagrave; degli Studi di questions. Milano; MA, Universidad de Barcelona; PHD, University of Pittsburgh Visiting Assistant Professor of Philosophy William Paris BA, Susquehanna University; MA, New York University; PHD, Pennsylvania State FACULTY University Stephen Angle Frank B. Weeks Visiting Assistant Professor of Philosophy BA, Yale University; PHD, University of Michigan Mansfield Freeman Professor of East Asian Studies; Professor of Philosophy; Director, Center for Global Studies; Professor, East Asian Studies EMERITI Lori Gruen Brian C. Fay BA, University of Colorado Boulder; PHD, University of Colorado Boulder BA, Loyola Marymount University; DPHIL, Oxford University; MA, Oxford William Griffin Professor of Philosophy; Professor
    [Show full text]
  • “The Sixth Sense”: Towards a History of Muscular Sensation
    Gesnerus 68/1 (2011) 218–71 “The Sixth Sense”: Towards a History of Muscular Sensation Roger Smith* Summary This paper outlines the history of knowledge about the muscular sense and provides a bibliographic resource for further research. A range of different topics, questions and approaches have interrelated throughout this history, and the discussion clarifies this rather than presenting detailed research in any one area. Part I relates the origin of belief in a muscular sense to empiricist accounts of the contribution of the senses to knowledge from Locke, via the idéologues and other authors, to the second half of the nine- teenth century. Analysis paid much attention to touch, first in the context of the theory of vision and then in its own right, which led to naming a distinct muscular sense. From 1800 to the present, there was much debate, the main lines of which this paper introduces, about the nature and function of what turned out to be a complex sense. A number of influential psycho-physiolo- gists, notably Alexander Bain and Herbert Spencer, thought this sense the most primitive and primary of all, the origin of knowledge of world, causa- tion and self as an active subject. Part II relates accounts of the muscular sense to the development of nervous physiology and of psychology. In the decades before 1900, the developing separation of philosophy, psychology and physiology as specialised disciplines divided up questions which earlier writers had discussed under the umbrella heading of muscular * The stimulus for writing up this paper, which I had long put off because I hoped to do some- thing more rounded, came from the participants, and especially from the organisers, Vincent Barras and Guillemette Bolens, of a project ‘L’intelligence kinesthésique et le savoir sensori- moteur: entre arts et sciences’, at a conference of World Knowledge Dialogue, ‘Interdisci- plinarity in action: a p ractical experience of interdisciplinary research’, Villars-sur-Ollon, Switzerland, 10–14 October 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Merleau-Ponty and the Transcendental Problem of Bodily Agency
    Merleau-Ponty and the Transcendental Problem of Bodily Agency Rasmus Thybo Jensen In Merleau-Ponty’s early works he draws attention to a problem concerning bodily agency which he presents as analogous to the problem of perception that is his primary concern. The analogy between the two problems is implicitly recognized when Merleau-Ponty in his first book The Structure of Behavior (1942) writes: Our intentions find their natural clothing or their embodiment in movements and are expressed in them as the thing is expressed in its perspectival aspects. (SC 1983, p. 188/ 1990, p. 203)1 In both cases the initial problem is to recognize the sui generis character of the intentionality that characterize the phenomena in question. For Merleau-Ponty the basic problem concerning perception consists in understanding how perception, as the occurrence in our subjective life it is, can constitute an openness to the world that confronts us with the object itself in person rather than a mere proxy which remains at a distance from reality itself. What I suggest in the following is that there exists an analogous problem concerning how we can regard the objective occur- rence of a bodily movement in the life an organism, as the bodily presence and direct intervention of a mind in the objective world rather than as a mere emissary of the mind. My aim is to flesh out this parallel problem concerning bodily agency and to show that it is in fact a problem that is more or less explicitly articulated in Merleau-Ponty’s early works exactly via an analogy to what he explicitly calls the problem of perception.
    [Show full text]
  • Allerton Park and Conference Center
    GUIDE TO THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS' DOCUMENTATION RELATED TO THE ALLERTON FAMILY AND ROBERT ALLERTON PARK AND CONFERENCE CENTER Compiled by Susan Enscore For the Robert Allerton Park and Conference Center University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign January 1991 Revised March 2004 Reformatted for Internet Posting, October, 2001 FOREWORD Since Robert Allerton gave his estate in Monticello to the University in 1946, the number and diversity of documents and related materials on this unique resource has grown steadily. By far the most ambitious and comprehensive attempt to identify and catalog major items is represented in this document which is the product of over a year's effort by Susan Enscore. Her work was carefully guided by Professors Maynard Brichford and William Maher, the University's archivist and assistant archivist. As interim co-directors, we commissioned this project to learn more about how much "Allertonia" exists and where it can be found. The size of this report confirms our suspicions that a wealth of useful material is available. A great deal of effort was involved in assembling this impressive reference document. It identifies the variety of documents that exist and their location, as well as serving as the basis for further expansion and update of the records of Robert Allerton Park and Conference Center. Researchers interested in examining the history associated with this gift will find this a valuable reference source. We appreciate all of Susan's work and the enthusiasm with which she approached the task. We thank Professors Brichford and Maher who added their experience to producing a well-organized and comprehensive document.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Perception As a Guide to Aesthetics
    OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRSTPROOFS, Fri Jan 31 2014, NEWGEN 5 Philosophy of Perception as a Guide to Aesthetics Bence Nanay 5.1 The Provocative Claim The aim of this paper is to argue for a provocative claim: that many, maybe even most traditional problems in aesthetics are in fact about philosophy of perception and can, as a result, be fruitfully addressed with the help of the conceptual apparatus of the philosophy of perception. I will spend much of the paper clarifying and qualifying this claim, which after all the qualifications may not sound so provocative after all. I need to clarify the following aspects of this claim: (a) What is meant by aesthetics. (b) What is meant by philosophy of perception. (c) Why should we accept that it is a promising avenue of research to consider prob- lems in aesthetics to be really about the philosophy of perception. I will take these in turn. But before we begin, it needs to be emphasized that on the face of it, the claim I make does not sound crazy, at least if we consider the etymology of the term ‘aesthetics’. The Greek word ‘aesthemi’ means perception and when Alexander Baumgarten introduced the concept of ‘aesthetics’ in 1750, what he meant by it was precisely the philosophy of perception: the study of sense perception (scientia cogni- tionis sensitivae). My claim is that, regardless of etymology, this connection can also be made today. It is important that my aim is not to argue that aesthetics should be a subdiscipline of philosophy of perception or that any approach that does not consider aesthetics to be philosophy of perception is doomed or should be considered inferior.
    [Show full text]
  • Bertrand Russell on Perception and Knowledge (1927 – 59)
    BERTRAND RUSSELL ON PERCEPTION AND KNOWLEDGE (1927 – 59) BERTRAND RUSSELL ON PERCEPTION AND KNOWLEDGE (1927 – 59) By DUSTIN Z. OLSON, B.A. (Hons.) A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Philosophy McMaster University © Copyright by Dustin Z. Olson, August 2011 ii MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY (2011) McMaster University (Philosophy) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: Bertrand Russell on Perception and Knowledge (1927 – 59) AUTHOR: Dustin Z. Olson SUPERVISOR: Nicholas Griffin NUMBER OF PAGES: vii, 154 iii ABSTRACT Bertrand Russell is one of the grandmasters of 20 th Century Analytic Philosophy. It is surprising, then, that his work fell out of fashion later in his career. As a result, very little has been discussed concerning Russell’s work from the period of 1927 – 59. This thesis provides an analysis of Russell’s philosophical work from this era. Our attention here is on Russell’s theory of perception and the underlying metaphysical structure that is developed as a result of his scientific outlook, as Russell’s philosophy during this time focused almost exclusively on perception, knowledge, and the epistemic relationship humans have with the world according to science. And because Russell’s system is in many ways prescient with regards to recent advances made in perception, mind and matter, and knowledge more generally, we also apply his theory to developments in the philosophy of perception since that time. Our initial discussion – Chapters 1 and 2 – is most concerned with an accurate explication of the concepts germane to and conclusions formed from Russell’s theory of perception.
    [Show full text]
  • Immanuel Kant: Philosophy of Perception
    Roger Williams University DOCS@RWU Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation Faculty Publications Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation 2019 Immanuel Kant: Philosophy of Perception John S. Hendrix Roger Williams University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.rwu.edu/saahp_fp Part of the Architectural History and Criticism Commons, and the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Hendrix, John S., "Immanuel Kant: Philosophy of Perception" (2019). Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation Faculty Publications. 41. https://docs.rwu.edu/saahp_fp/41 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation at DOCS@RWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DOCS@RWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Immanuel Kant: Philosophy of Perception John Shannon Hendrix In an early treatise, Attempt to Introduce the Concept of Negative Magni- tudes into Philosophy (Versuch, den Begriff der negative Grössen in die Weltweisheit einzuführen, 1763), Immanuel Kant developed a theory about thoughts that are fleeting, negated or cancelled, obscured or darkened. As certain thoughts become clearer, the other thoughts become less clear and more obscured (Verdunkelt). Kant’s concept was influenced by the petites perceptions of Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. He invoked Leibniz in establish- ing that only a small portion of the representations which occur in the soul, as the result of sense perception, are clear and enduring.1 Gottfried Leibniz conceived of minute perceptions of objects or ideas which have too little intensity to effect conscious thought. The minute per- ceptions contribute to ordinary perceptions, but they are so small and there are so many of them that they pass unnoticed in the consciousness connected to perception.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Philosophy of Perception
    OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF 1 Philosophy of Perception The New Wave Bence Nanay I Peter Strawson famously wrote more than thirty years ago that “a philoso- pher’s views on [perception] are a key to his theory of knowledge and to his metaphysics” (1979, 41). At that time, this statement probably would have been quite provocative inasmuch as it made perception sound more important than it was assumed to be. Now, thirty years later, Strawson’s claim sounds too weak. A philoso- pher’s views on perception are as important as her theory of knowledge or her metaphysics. Some may even be tempted to say that a philosopher’s views on epistemology or metaphysics are a key to her theory of percep- tion. Perception is no longer seen as an inferior subfi eld of philosophy that may or may not help us to understand the philosophical questions that are supposedly more fundamental. Perception, at present, is as central a philosophical subfi eld as it gets. This change is not only a merely quantitative one. It is true that more philosophers are working on perception and that their output is more sophisticated and nuanced than ever before, but this is not the whole story. What is more relevant, and more interesting from a philosophical point of view, is that the nature of the questions that are being asked about perception has also changed. The aim of this volume is to give a representative sample of this new wave of philosophy of perception. And the aim of this introduction is to outline the questions contemporary philosophers of perception are concerned with and how they differ from the “old” philosophical questions about perception.
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Perception
    This is a repository copy of The Value of Perception. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/138062/ Version: Published Version Article: Allen, Keith Malcolm orcid.org/0000-0002-3219-2102 (2019) The Value of Perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. pp. 633-656. ISSN 0031-8205 https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12574 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Philosophy and Phenomenological Research doi: 10.1111/phpr.12574 © 2019 The Authors. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Philosophy and Phenonmenological Research Inc. The Value of Perception KEITH ALLEN University of York This paper develops a form of transcendental na€ıve realism. According to na€ıve realism, veridical perceptual experiences are essentially relational. According to transcendental na€ıve realism, the na€ıve realist theory of perception is not just one theory of perception amongst others, to be established as an inference to the best explanation and assessed on the basis of a cost-benefit analysis that weighs performance along a number of different dimensions: for instance, fidelity to appearances, simplicity, systematicity, fit with scientific theo- ries, and so on.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Rationality of Perception
    The Rationality of Perception: Replies to Lord, Railton, and Pautz The Rationality of Perception thesis raises so many questions about the epistemic roles of Susanna Siegel perceptual experience that what’s needed, in my estimation, is a constructive defense of it: Book symposium forthcoming in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research an account of how inference could affect the epistemic powers of perceptual experience. My constructive defense aims to show that it is coherent and plausible that perceptual experience plays epistemic roles that make it rationally susceptible. Introduction The main task of The Rationality of Perception is to construct an epistemology of perception As part of my constructive defense of the Rationality of Perception thesis, I defend an according to which perceptual experiences can be rational or irrational. On this picture, approach to inference according to which inferring is a distinctive way of leveraging experiences are susceptible to rational evaluation. The Rationality of Perception thesis is information one has already into a new informational state. When it is formed via such a that both perceptual experiences and the processes that give rise to them can be rational or response, the new informational state is the conclusion of the act of inferring. I argue that irrational. nothing precludes perceptual experiences from being such conclusions. So part of my defense is a general theory of inferring in general. My target is the kind of inferring the The epistemic roles that I attribute to perceptual experiences are best brought out by a redounds well or poorly on the subject’s rational standing. Many of the low-level processes subclass of cases in which perceptual experiences are heavily shaped by prior outlooks.
    [Show full text]