DOCSLIB.ORG

The 1990S and Beyond

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The 1990S and Beyond .-_ /I _',II _' Proceedings Second Conference on the Management of the Illinois River System: The 1990s and Beyond Hotel Pere Marquette, Peoria, l]linois October 3-4, 1989 OIS A conference for citizens, organizations, industry and government representatives, and resource management professionals Printed by the University of Illinois Water Resources Center, with fmancial support from the Illinois Department of Energy and Natural Resources. (300 / December 1989) , Proceedings Second Conference on the Management of the Illinois River System: The 1990s and Beyond A conference for citizens, organizations, industry and government representatives, and resource management professionals Hotel Pere Marquette, Peoria, Illinois October 3-4, 1989 Issued as Special Report No. 18 Water Resources Center University of Illinois 2535 Hydrosystems Lab 205 N. Mathevcs Ave., Urbana, IL 61801 217 / 3334?536 Contents Acknowledgments ............................................. v Opening Comments Robert Frazee ............................................. 3 Welcome James Maloof ............................................ 6 Welcome to the River Conference James Christopher .......................................... 7 Progress in the Illinois River Watershed Since the First Illinois River Conference Donald R. Vonnahrne ........................................ 8 Illinois State Water Plan Task Force The Illinois Department of Conservation's Changing Role in the Illinois River Basin John W. Comerio ........................................... 15 Water Quality Impacts of Illinois River Commercial Navigation Thomas A. Butts and Dana B. Shaekleford ............................ 19 Controlling Soil Erosion in the lllinois River Basin Richard W. Nichols .......................................... 28 Waterways -- Their Recreational Potential Bonnie W. Noble ........................................... 36 Comments for the Illinois River Conference Richard G. Semonin ........................................ [_ Peoria Lake Sedimentation and Proposed Artificial Islands Misganaw Dernissie ......................................... (_j Sediment Management Problems Nani G. Bhowmik .......................................... 58 Habitat Restoration in Backwater Lakes of the Illinois River Don Rosebootrb Rick Twai¢ and Dan Sallee ............................ 65 Benefits of TARP to the IIlinois River Krishan P. Singh, Thomas A. Butts, andAli Durgunoglu ..................... 69 Environmental Management Program Proposals -- the Illinois Basin BillDonels .............................................. 77 The Illinois River Basin: Lifeblood of Our State Karen Witter ............................................. 8_.' Update of Tri-County Riverfi'ont Plan L. DonaldLuebbe .......................................... 91 Local Initiatives Introductory Comments Barbara Mantz Drake ........................................ 96 The Illinois River and Peoria Lakes: It's Time to Act Michael Reuter, Henry Hollin_ and Robert Frazee ......................... 99 Illinois River Soil Conservation Task Force Don Condit .............................................. 106 iii I Stream Bank Stabilization and the nlinois River Soil Conservation Task Force Don Condit and Don Roseboom .................................. 110 Value of Citizen Stream Quality Monitoring as an Educational Tool Brook McDonald .......................................... 133 Revenue Sources for River Management Wesley Seitz ............................................. 139 Illinois River Coalition/Father Marquette Compact Henry Holling ............................................ 145 Sediment Management Glenn E. Stout ............................................ 147 Comparison of Commercial/Commodity and Recreational Use of the Illinois River System: The Case of the Illinois and Michigan National Heritage Canal Corridor Rabel £ Burdge and Robert A. Robertson ............................. 150 The Federal Perspective Long-Term Resource Monitoring-- A New Source of Data for Researchers and Resource Managers Jerry Rasmussen ........................................... 156 Long-Term Resource Monitoring on the Illinois River Richard E. Sparks .......................................... 158 Planning for the Future of Navigation on the Illinois Waterway Chip Smith, Paul D. Soylce, and Michael A. Co¢lcetill ...................... 160 Erosion Control in the Illinois River Bash-- Past, Present, and Future Gary Parker ............................................. 168 U.S. EPA Perspective on Nonpoint Pollution Control and Wetland Functions Robert Pepirg Thomas Davenporg and Douglas Ehom ...................... 171 The Illinois River and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers John R. Brown ............................................ 175 Closing Comments Robert Frazee ............................................ 181 Appendices Appendix A-- Photographs .................................... 185 Appendix B-- Conference Program ................................ 189 Appendix C-- Changes to Program and List of Poster Session Participants ......... 191 Appendix D-- Conference Participants .............................. 193 Appendix E--Author Index .................................... 199 iv Acknowledgments Planning Committee Sponsors Robert Frazee, Conference Chairman _tion of Illinois Soil and Water Conservation Association of Illinois Soil and Water Conservation Districts; Heartland Water Resources Council of Districts Central Illinois; Illinois Department of Energy and John D. Ol_on Natural Resources; Illinois River Coalition/Father Heartland Water Resources Council of Central Illinois Marquette Compact; Illinois Section of the American Water Resources Association; Illinois State Water Henry Hollin_ Mar//yn Ley/and, and Plan "Ihsk Force. Bonnie Noble Illinois Department of Agriculture R/chard Nicho/s Co-Sponsors Illinois Department of Conservation Federal Jan Arbise and W'dliam P. White Congressman Lane Evans; Congressman Robert Illinois Department of Energy and Natural Michel; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; U.S. Resources, Office of Research and Planning Department of Agriculture; U.S. Environmental L/nda Vogt Protection Agency;, O.S. F'mhand Wildlife Service; Illinois Department of Transportation, Division of USDA Soil Conservation Service. Water Resources State of Illinois Gary 17,Clark Department of Agriculture, Department of Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Conservation; Environmental Protection Agency; Richard Mollahan and Scott Rbtau Department of Transportation, Division of Water Illinois State Water Survey Resources; University of Illinois, Cooperative Nard Bhowndlg Richard G. Semonir_ and Extension Service; University of Illinois, Water K.mhan P. S/n_ Resources Center. University of Illinois, Water Resources Center Organizations Glenn E. Stout Association of Illinois Electric Cooperatives; Caterpillar Inc.; Central Illinois Employer Speclalthanks to: Association; CILCORP, Inc.; City of Peoria; Illinois Association of Park Districts; Illinois Chamber;, Caterpillar Inc.; CILCORP, Inc.; Illinois Department Illinois Coal Association; Illinois Environmental of Energy and Natural Resources; Hotel Pere Council; Illinois Farm Bureau; Illinois Farmer's Marquette; Peoria Journal Star. Union; Illinois Municipal League; Illinois River Soil Conservation 'l_sk Force; Illinois River Valley A thank you is also due Holly Korab, editor at the Association; Illinois State Grange; Illinois Wildlife University of Illinois Water Resources Center, for Federation; League of Women Voters, Peoria organizing and compiling both the conference Chapter;, Peoria Area Chamber of Commerce; Peoria abstracts and the proceedings. Convention and Visitors Bureau; Peoria Park District; Sierra Club, Great Lakes Chapter;, Soil and Water Conservation Society of America, Illinois Chapter;, "Iti-County Regional Planning Commission, Tri-County Riverfront Forum. v Proceedings OPENING COMMENTS Robert W. Frazee, Cooperative Extension Service University of Illinois Coopomtive Extension Service, Region 4 Office P.O. Box 118, Peoria, IL 61650 It is my pleasure to welcome you to the second Conference on the Management of the Illinois River System: the 1990s and Beyond. We hope this conference will be informative, educational, and enjoyable for you. It will provide you with the opportunity to broaden your knowledge on what's happening throughout the entire Illinois River System from Gmfton to Chicago. The program format will feature panel discussions from representatives of federal and state agencies, our state legislators, and local citizen action councils. This evening we will break away from the conference setting to enjoy the pleasure of a dinner cruise aboard our famous paddle wheeler, the Spirit of Peoria. This evening's dinner cruise will provide an excellent opportunity for each of us to be able to visit informa//y with speakers, special guests, legislators, and other conference participants to share our knowledge and experiences as they relate to the Illinois River. The Illinois River is an important focal point for our state, as it provides numerous public benefits for the farmer, industry, and society as a whole. Part of the third largest system in the world, the Illinois River drains nearly 18.5 million acres in three states. The basin occupies 44 percent of the land area of Illinois and includes over 95 percent of Illinois' urban areas. The ///ino/s River Watershed has been the focus of public concern and countless research studies for decades. Until recent years, it has seemed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Peoria Riverfront Development, Illinois (Ecosystem Restoration)
    PEORIA RIVERFRONT DEVELOPMENT, ILLINOIS (ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION) FEASIBILITY STUDY WITH INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MAIN REPORT MARCH 2003 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ROCK ISLAND DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS CLOCK TOWER BUILDING - P.O. BOX 2004 ROCK ISLAND, ILLINOIS 61204-2004 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF http://www.mvr.usace.army.mil CEMVR-PM-M PEORIA RIVERFRONT DEVELOPMENT, ILLINOIS (ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION) FEASIBILITY STUDY WITH INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MAIN REPORT MARCH 2003 Executive Summary he Peoria Riverfront Development (Ecosystem Restoration) Project area includes Lower Peoria Lake. The area lies within Peoria and Tazewell Counties, Illinois, and includes TIllinois River Miles 162-167. The project is related to the Peoria Riverfront Development Project, a public and private cooperative effort that also includes revitalization of the City’s downtown area. Development includes a visitor’s center, city park, residential redevelopment, community center, riverboat landing, sports complex, entertainment centers, and retail development. The region has begun to reclaim its abandoned industrial riverfront, with the understanding that a healthy, attractive, and sustainable environment must be present. The Illinois River is a symbol of the region’s economic, social, and cultural history, as well as its future. Therefore, ecosystem restoration in Peoria Lake is a vital component to an overall effort and vision to develop the Peoria Riverfront in an ecologically, economically, and socially sustainable manner. This Ecosystem Restoration Feasibility Study was conducted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (Non-Federal Sponsor) to investigate the Federal and State interest in ecosystem restoration within Peoria Lake. In support of this resource vision, several regulatory efforts on the part of the cities and counties to address the sedimentation issue affecting the Illinois River have been adopted.
    [Show full text]
  • Six Rivers, Five Glaciers, and an Outburst Flood: the Considerable Legacy of the Illinois River
    SIX RIVERS, FIVE GLACIERS, AND AN OUTBURST FLOOD: THE CONSIDERABLE LEGACY OF THE ILLINOIS RIVER Don McKay, Chief Scientist, Illinois State Geological Survey 615 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820 [email protected] INTRODUCTION The waters of the modern Illinois River flow gently through looping meanders bordered by quiet backwater lakes and drop only a few inches in each river mile. Concealed beneath this gentle river is geologic evidence that the Illinois descended from ancient rivers with surprising and sometimes violent histories. The geologic story of the Illinois River is not only an account of an interesting chapter of Earth history, but it also reveals a rich geologic legacy of valuable and vulnerable resources that should be managed and used wisely. Modern, detailed, geologic field mapping has enabled new insights into the river’s history. Begun in 2000 by the Illinois State Geological Survey (ISGS), geologic mapping in the Middle Illinois River Valley area (Fig 1) was undertaken to aid planning for an expansion of Illinois Highway 29 between Chillicothe and I-180 west of Hennepin. Mapping was focused initially on the western bluff and valley bottom west of the river near the present highway but has since been expanded to more than 275 sq mi in Putnam, Marshall, and Peoria counties. Funding was provided by Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) and by ISGS. Several maps are scheduled to be published (McKay and others 2008a, 2008b, 2008c). Figure 1. Location of recent and ongoing geologic mapping area in the Middle Illinois River Valley region of north-central Illinois (left) and northeastern portion of the Chillicothe 7.5-minute surficial geology map (right) showing areas of river deposits, glacial tills, and bedrock where they occur at land surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Disaster Mitigation Floodwall Projects Cities of Marseilles, Ottawa, and Peru, Lasalle County, Illinois Village of Depue, Bureau County, Illinois January 2018
    Final Programmatic Environmental Assessment Pre-Disaster Mitigation Floodwall Projects Cities of Marseilles, Ottawa, and Peru, LaSalle County, Illinois Village of DePue, Bureau County, Illinois January 2018 Prepared by Booz Allen Hamilton 8283 Greensboro Drive McLean, VA 22102 Prepared for FEMA Region V 536 South Clark Street, Sixth Floor Chicago, IL 60605 Photo attributes: Top left: City of Ottawa Top right: City of Peru Bottom left: City of Marseilles Bottom right: Village of DePue Pre-Disaster Mitigation Floodwall Projects Page ii January 2018 Programmatic Environmental Assessment Acronyms and Abbreviations List of Acronyms and Abbreviations oC Degrees Celsius ACHP Advisory Council on Historic Preservation AD Anno Domini AIRFA American Indian Religious Freedom Act APE Area of Potential Effect ARPA Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 BFE Base Flood Elevation BLM Bureau of Land Management BMP Best Management Practice BP Before Present CAA Clean Air Act CEQ Council on Environmental Quality C.F.R. Code of Federal Regulations CLOMR Conditional Letter of Map Revision CRS Community Rating System CWA Clean Water Act CWS Community Water Supplies dB decibels EA Environmental Assessment EO Executive Order EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map Pre-Disaster Mitigation Floodwall Projects Page iii January 2018 Programmatic Environmental Assessment Acronyms and Abbreviations FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact FPPA Farmland Protection Policy
    [Show full text]
  • North Farm Creek and Dry Run Tributary Implementation Plan
    North Farm Creek and Dry Run Tributary Implementation Plan By: Tetra Tech 1468 West 9th Street, Suite 620 Cleveland, OH 44113 In support of: EPA Contract Number EP-C-11-009 Work Assignment 1-29 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 77 W. Jackson Blvd. Chicago, IL 60604 December 2012 North Farm Creek and Dry Run Tributary Implementation Plan Page ii Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 TMDL/LRS Summary ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Watershed Plan Requirements - Nine Key Elements................................................................. 6 1.3 Implementation Plan Approach ................................................................................................ 7 1.3.1 Nonstructural Management Opportunities ....................................................................... 8 1.3.2 Structural Management Opportunities ............................................................................. 8 2. Implementation Partners and Existing Implementation Efforts ............................................ 10 2.1 Implementation Partners ........................................................................................................ 10 2.2 Existing Implementation Efforts ............................................................................................ 11 2.2.1 Honoring our Water Stormwater Plan ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater in the Peoria Region
    STATE OF ILLINOIS ADLAI E. STEVENSON, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION NOBLE J. PUFFER, Director DD7ISION OF THE STATE WATER SURVEY A. M. BUSWELL, Chief URBANA BULLETIN NO. 39 GROUNDWATER IN THE PEORIA REGION PART 1—GEOLOGY LELAND HORBERG, STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PART 2—HYDROLOGY MAX SUTER, STATE WATER SURVEY PART 3—CHEMISTRY T. E. LARSON, STATE WATER SURVEY A Cooperative Research Project Conducted by The State Water Survey and The State Geological Survey PRINTED BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS URBANA, ILLINOIS 1950 This report is also a publication of THE STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY as its BULLETIN NO. 75. STATE OF ILLINOIS ADLAI E. STEVENSON, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION NOBLE J. PUFFER, Director DIVISION OF THE STATE WATER SURVEY A. M. BUSWELL, Chief URBANA BULLETIN NO. 39 GROUNDWATER IN THE PEORIA REGION PART 1—GEOLOGY LELAND HORBERG, STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PART 2—HYDROLOGY MAX SUTER, STATE WATER SURVEY PART 3—CHEMISTRY T. E. LARSON, STATE WATER SURVEY A Cooperative Research Project Conducted by The State Water Survey and The State Geological Survey PRINTED BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS URBANA, ILLINOIS 1950 ORGANIZATION STATE OF ILLINOIS HON. ADLAI E. STEVENSON, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION HON. NOBLE J. PUFFER, Director BOARD OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION HON. NOBLE J. PUFFER, Chairman W. H. NEWHOUSE, PH.D., Geology ROGER ADAMS, PH.D., D.SC, Chemistry LOUIS R. HOWSON, C.E., Engineering A. E. EMERSON, PH.D., Biology LEWIS H. TIFFANY, PH.D., Forestry GEORGE D. STODDARD, PH.D., LITT.D., LL.D., L.H.D.
    [Show full text]
  • La Grange Pool - Illinois River 2021 Fisheries Fact Sheet
    LA GRANGE POOL - ILLINOIS RIVER 2021 FISHERIES FACT SHEET The Illinois River is formed at the confluence of the Des Plaines and Kankakee rivers near Channahon in northeastern Illinois. It flows southwest for 273 miles across the state to enter the Mississippi River at Grafton. There are five dams along the Illinois forming pooled reaches named (upstream to downstream) the Dresden Pool, Marseilles Pool, Starved Rock Pool, Peoria Pool and La Grange Pool. The downstream reach is called the Alton Pool because it is influenced by Mel Price Lock and Dam on the Mississippi River at Alton. LOCATION: The La Grange Pool of the Illinois River extends from the La Grange Lock and Dam at mile 80.2 to the tailwater of the Peoria Lock and Dam at mile 157.7. Brown, Cass, Schuyler, Mason, Fulton, Tazewell and Peoria counties border this reach. RIVER ACCESS: The La Grange Pool is characterized by slow to moderate water velocities and soft substrates of sand and mud. The large number of backwater lakes and sloughs made this reach historically one of the most biologically productive river reaches in the world for waterfowl and fish. Backwaters managed for fishing by IDNR include state fish and wildlife areas at Anderson Lake, Spring Lake, Rice Lake, and Banner Marsh as well as the restored Thompson and Flag lakes at the Emiquon Preserve. Bath Chute, a river side channel, has excellent panfish and largemouth bass populations and is accessible by a public boat ramp in Bath. Boat access to the LaGrange Pool is also available at LaGrange Lock and Dam, Beardstown, Browning, Havana, Liverpool, Kingston Mines and Pekin.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the ILLINOIS RIVER and the Decline of a NATIVE SPECIES by Paige A
    The history of the ILLINOIS RIVER and the decline of a NATIVE SPECIES BY PAIGE A. METTLER-CHERRY AND MARIAN SMITH 34 | The Confluence | Fall 2009 A very important advantage, and one which some, perhaps, will find it hard to credit, is that we could easily go to Florida in boats, and by a very good navigation. There would be but one canal to make … Louis Joliet, 1674, making the earliest known proposal to alter the Illinois River (Hurlbut 1881) Emiquon National Wildlife Refuge as it appears today. The corn and soybean fields (see page 38) have been replaced by the reappearance of Thompson and Flag lakes. The refuge already teems with wildlife, including many species of migrating waterfowl, wading birds, deer, and re-introduced native fish species. (Photo: Courtesy of the author) Fall 2009 | The Confluence | 35 Large river ecosystems are perhaps the most modified systems in The lower Illinois Valley is much older than the upper and has the world, with nearly all of the world’s 79 large river ecosystems been glaciated several times. The Illinoisan ice sheet covered much altered by human activities (Sparks 1995). In North America, of Illinois, stopping 19.9 miles north of the Ohio River. The effects the Illinois River floodplain has been extensively modified and of the glacier are easily seen when comparing the flat agricultural the flood pulse, or annual flood regime, of the river is distorted fields of central and northern Illinois, which the glacier covered, as a result of human activity (Sparks, Nelson, and Yin 1998). to the Shawnee Hills of southern Illinois, where the glacier did Although many view flooding as an unwanted destructive force of not reach.
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois River Bluffs Area Assessment
    sS*Hs%,„ Volume 4 Socio-Economic Profile Environmental Quality Archaeological Resources Illinois River Bluffs Area Assessment ILLINOIS DfPABTMFNT OF NATURAL RESOURCES *:; -;.: • » . J-.-.J ILLINOIS KIVLKtSLUf-r;, AREA ASSESSMENT. COPY "99 ILLINOIS STATE WATER SURVEY LIBRARY jy 7 Illinois River Bluffs Area Assessment Volume 4 Part I: Socio-Economic Profile Illinois Department of Natural Resources Office of Realty and Environmental Planning Division of Energy and Environmental Assessment 524 South Second Springfield, Illinois 62701 (217)524-0500 Part II: Environmental Quality Illinois Department of Natural Resources Office of Scientific Research and Analysis Dlinois State Water Survey 2204 Griffith Drive Champaign, Dlinois 61820 (217)244-5459 Waste Management and Research Center One East Hazelwood Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820 (217)333-8944 Part III: Archaeological Resources Steven R. Ahler Illinois Department of Natural Resources Office of Scientific Research and Analysis Illinois State Museum Spring & Edward Streets Springfield, Dlinois 62706 (217)782-7387 1998 Jim Edgar, Governor State of Illinois Brent Manning, Director Illinois Department of Natural Resources 524 South Second Springfield, Illinois 62701 300 Printed by the authority of the State of Illinois Other CTAP Publications The Changing Illinois Environment: Critical Trends, summary and 7-volume technical report Illinois Land Cover, An Atlas, plus CD-ROM Inventory ofEcologically Resource-Rich Areas in Illinois Rock River Area Assessment, 5 -volume technical report The Rock
    [Show full text]
  • North Branch Chicago River Watershed-Based Plan
    CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION NORTH BRANCH CHICAGO RIVER WATERSHED-BASED PLAN CONTENTS 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.1 What is a Watershed? ............................................................................................................. 1-3 1.1.1 Why A Watershed-Based Plan? ....................................................................................... 1-4 1.2 North Branch Chicago River Watershed Planning Area .......................................................... 1-4 1.2.1 Chicago River Watershed................................................................................................. 1-4 1.2.2 North Branch Chicago River Watershed Planning Area .................................................. 1-5 1.2.2.1 North Branch Chicago River Watershed Partnerships ............................................................. 1-8 1.2.2.2 North Branch Chicago River Watershed Planning .................................................................... 1-8 1.3 WATERSHED PLAN PURPOSE .................................................................................................. 1-9 1.4 Watershed Plan Requirements, Process, and Organization ................................................. 1-10 1.5 Previous and Related Studies and Plans ............................................................................... 1-11 1.6 Use of the Plan .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Physical Geography of the Illinois River Valley Near Peoria
    The Physical Geography of the Illinois River Valley Near Peoria An Updated Self-Conducted Field Trip using EcoCaches and GPS Technology Donald E. Bevenour East Peoria Community High School Illinois State University Copyright, 1991 Updated by: Kevin M. Emmons Morton High School Bradley University 2007 Additional Support: Martin Hobbs East Peoria Community High School Abstract THE PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY OF THE ILLINOIS RIVER VALLEY NEAR PEORIA: AN UPDATED SELF CONDUCTED FIELD TRIP USING ECOCACHES AND GPS TECHNOLOGY This field trip has been written so that anyone can enjoy the trip without the guidance of a professional. The trip could be taken by student groups, families, or an individual; at least two people, a driver and a reader/navigator, are the recommended minimum number of persons for maximum effectiveness and safety. Subjects of discussion include the Illinois River, the Bloomington, Shelbyville, and LeRoy Moraines, various aspects of the glacial history of the area, stream processes, floodplains, natural vegetation, and human adaptations to the physical environment such as agriculture, industry, transportation, and growth of cities. Activities include riding to the top of a lookout tower, judging distance to several landmark objects, and scenic views of the physical and cultural environment. All along the trip, GPS coordinates are supplied to aid you in your navigation. Information on EcoCaches is available at http://www.ilega.org/ Why take a self-guided field trip? A self-guided field trip is an excellent way to learn more about the area in which one lives. Newcomers or visitors to an area should find it a most enlightening manner in which to personalize the new territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Features of the Upper Illinois Waterway
    REPORT OF INVESTIGATION 79 Water Quality Features of the Upper Illinois Waterway by THOMAS A. BUTTS, RALPH L. EVANS, and SHUNDAR LIN Title: Water Quality Features of the Upper Illinois Waterway. Abstract: The dissolved oxygen resources of the Upper Illinois Waterway are de­ pressed because of a combination of oxygen demand sources including carbonaceous and nitrogenous BOD, benthic biological extraction, and sediments. Because of these demands, maintenance of 6.0 mg/l DO in the stream system is difficult, and achieve­ ment of a minimum DO requirement of 5.0 mg/1 requires the nitrogenous and carbona­ ceous demand be substantially reduced. Water quality data obtained from field sur­ veys are summarized together with hydraulic and hydrologic data to determine waste­ water treatment needs. Collection of the waterway algal types reveals that diatoms are the dominant group comprising about 85 percent of the total densities. However, algal concentrations do not impair use of the waterway for recreation. Fecal coliform bac­ teria densities decrease with downstream movement at a rate of 0.77 per day in the upper pools and 0.42 per day in the lower pools. About 9 percent of the total coliform bacteria population are fecal coliforms. Only 3 of 19 stations sampled met the bac­ terial quality standards required by the Illinois Pollution Control Board. Reference: Butts, Thomas A., Ralph L. Evans, and Shundar Lin. Water Quality Fea­ tures of the Upper Illinois Waterway. Illinois State Water Survey, Urbana, Report of Investigation 79, 1975. Indexing Terms: Algae, bacteria, benthic organisms, coliforms, hydraulic-hydrologic models, modeling, nitrogen, oxygen demand, sediments, streams, water pollution con­ trol, water quality, water temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-21-240R, Accessible Version, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Information on the Navigation and Ecosystem Sustainability Progra
    441 G St. N.W. Washington, DC 20548 January 22, 2021 Accessible Version The Honorable John Barrasso The Honorable Tom Carper United States Senate The Honorable Peter A. DeFazio Chairman The Honorable Sam Graves Ranking Member Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure House of Representatives U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Information on the Navigation and Ecosystem Sustainability Program The Upper Mississippi River system provides approximately $1 billion in annual benefits to the nation’s economy through boating, fishing, and other uses, according to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps).1 The river system also supports irreplaceable habitats and ecosystems— including more than 2.5 million acres of aquatic, wetland, forest, grassland, and agricultural habitats across the states of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin. In 1986, Congress declared its intent to recognize the Upper Mississippi River system as a nationally significant commercial navigation system and a nationally significant ecosystem.2 The Corps is responsible for operating and maintaining the navigation infrastructure along the Upper Mississippi River system and for managing, restoring, and protecting the surrounding ecosystem.3 According to the Corps, balancing the navigational importance of the river system with the need to protect the ecosystem is challenging. The Corps operates 37 lock and dam sites and maintains 1,200 miles of 9-foot deep navigation channels along the Upper Mississippi River and the Illinois Waterway, which connects with the Mississippi River and lies within the Upper Mississippi River basin. (See enc. I for a map of the Upper Mississippi River basin and locations of the Corps’ 37 locks and dams.) 1The Upper Mississippi River system comprises those river reaches having commercial navigation channels on the Mississippi River main stem north of Cairo, Illinois; the Illinois River and Waterway; and four other midwestern rivers: St Croix, Minnesota, Black, and Kaskaskia.
    [Show full text]