DOCSLIB.ORG

Exoplanet Trading Cards Activity Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

About the Cards About the Game Exoplanet Trading Cards feature a sampling of The exoplanet card game is a round-robin game exoplanet images and facts from JPL’s Eyes on that uses the 14 exoplanet game cards. Exoplanets. Note: The exoplanet images are not These cards have a purple border and a game telescope images. They are artist conceptions question at the bottom. Game cards include: based on scientific data. For background on how exoplanets are visualized, see the Universe Beta Pictoris b, HD 10647 b, HD 40307 c, KELT-6 Unplugged video Art vs. Science or JPL’s feature b, KELT-6 c, KELT-19 A b, KELT-20 b, Kepler-62 f, The Art of Exoplanets. Kepler-1229 b, Proxima Centauri b, Tau Ceti f, Tau Ceti g, TRAPPIST-1 e, and TRAPPIST-1 h The cards and related activities are designed for families and small groups of learners ages 12+, but Check the “How to Play” card for directions. Play can be adapted for other age groups and uses. continues until all of the game cards have been shared aloud and the game returns to the first The deck contains a “How to Play” card, a “Did You person who shared their card. Know?” card, a “Types of Exoplanets” card, 14 game cards, five bonus cards, and an “Explore The answer to each question is an exoplanet More” card. featured on another card. No answer key is provided because the cards supply the answers. The “Did You Know?” card contains key facts about exoplanets. It can be used to introduce the topic and establish a basic understanding Set-up before playing the card game. Print the trading cards on cardstock, cut out, and The “Types of Exoplanets” card describes the fold. Alternately, print on plain paper, cut out, fold, four types of exoplanets featured in the deck. It and laminate. Distribute one card to each player. can be used to build background and introduce the types of worlds learners will read about. For groups of 15+: Use more than one deck of cards and group players with the same card The “Explore More” card includes links to together into pairs or teams. additional activities and resources. For smaller groups: Use one deck of cards. Some The bonus cards have a blue border and are players may need to hold more than one card. optional. They can be used for group management, sorting and classifying activities, or distribution to Note: Be sure to make multiple copies of the bonus learners who successfully answer discussion cards if using them for other activities. questions. 1 Exoplanet Trading Cards www.universe-of-learning.org Other Activities Going Further: Data Activity This activity can be used to explore the relationship 1. Sort and classify between star temperature and the habitable zone, while reinforcing graphing skills. Learners can plot The Exoplanet Trading Cards contain information each exoplanet’s star temperature and distance that can be used to sort or classify the featured using the graph included on the next page. exoplanets into groups. It can be helpful to plot habitable zone exoplanets Learners can arrange the cards in alphabetical in one color and non-habitable zone exoplanets in a order (or group cards by first letter), by distance, or different color. Note: Due to scaling, exoplanets by star temperature. around very hot stars or with large distances will fall The cards can also be sorted by orbital period or outside of the grid. grouped by planet type, planet size, habitable zone, Learners should see that the habitable zone or date of discovery. planets form a trend line. This line shows that, as star temperature increases, planet distance also 2. Play an exoplanet matching game increases. Two players can use two decks of cards to play a [See details from the Planetary Habitability Laboratory] matching game that reinforces memory and pattern A planet can’t be too close to its parent star or it will recognition skills. The object of the game is to be too hot. Worlds around hotter stars have to be make as many matching pairs as possible. farther away to be in the habitable zone. However, Players lay each card image-side down on a floor a planet can’t be too far away from its star or it will or table. One player turns over two cards. If the be too cold. cards do not match, the player puts them back, The graph shows the general area of the “warm facedown, and his or her turn ends. zone” or habitable zone for different stars. This is If the cards do match, the player gets to keep the the region that is “just right” for liquid water. pair, and turns over two more cards. You can show the approximate thickness of the The game continues until all of the cards are graph’s warm zone by adding Venus, Earth, and matched. The player with the most pairs wins. Mars to the graph. These planets are in the habitable zone of our solar system – 3. Design a travel poster Venus’ distance: 0.72 astronomical unit Learners can identify a favorite exoplanet and Earth’s distance: 1 astronomical unit conduct research and/or imagine what the surface Mars’ distance: 1.52 astronomical units of their exoplanet might be like. They can then design a travel poster highlighting the key Sun’s temperature: 5,500 °C characteristics of their exoplanet. See JPL’s Exoplanet Travel Bureau for examples. Note: Although our solar system has three planets in the habitable zone, only one (Earth) has the right conditions for liquid water and life as we know it. 4. Create more questions Bonus: Habitable Zone Bingo Learners can think of, and record, other questions to ask about a particular exoplanet. These Using the bonus cards, call out or display each questions can be used for further research or to exoplanet’s star temperature and distance. create a new game. Learners use their graphs to see whether the planet is, or is not, in the habitable zone. If they answer correctly, they can earn the bonus card. 2 Exoplanet Trading Cards www.universe-of-learning.org PHL @ UPR Arecibo Arecibo UPR @ PHL Stars, Sequence of Main Zone from Habitable Adapted 3 Exoplanet Trading Cards www.universe-of-learning.org Adapted from Habitable Zone of Main Sequence Stars, PHL @ UPR Arecibo Arecibo UPR @ PHL Stars, Sequence of Main Zone from Habitable Adapted 4 Exoplanet Trading Cards www.universe-of-learning.org Other Resources Vocabulary Exoplanet Sizes Relative to Earth or Jupiter Astronomical unit (AU): a unit of measure that represents the average distance between Earth Exoplanet Radius Mass and the Sun, which is about 150 million kilometers or 93 million miles. This distance equals one in Beta Pictoris b 1.65 Jupiters 11 Jupiters astronomical units, or 1 AU. HD 10647 b 1.23 Jupiters 0.94 Jupiters Celsius (°C): a temperature scale on which the HD 40307 c 2.46 Earths 6.60 Earths freezing point of water is 0 °C and the boiling point KELT-6 b 1.30 Jupiters 0.52 Jupiters is 100 °C. KELT-6 c 1.16 Jupiters 3.71 Jupiters Exoplanet: a planet outside of our solar system KELT-19 A b 1.91 Jupiters 4.07 Jupiters that usually orbits another star. KELT-20 b 1.74 Jupiters 3.38 Jupiters Habitable zone: the area around a star where it is Kepler-62 f 1.41 Earths 2.80 Earths not too hot and not too cold for surrounding planets to have liquid water. Kepler-1229 b 1.40 Earths 2.43 Earths Proxima 1.08 Earths 1.27 Earths Centauri b Orbital period: the time it takes an object in space to complete one orbit around another object. For Tau Ceti f 1.81 Earths 3.93 Earths planets orbiting stars, the orbital period is Tau Ceti g 1.18 Earths 1.75 Earths equivalent to the planet’s year. For example, Earth’s orbital period is about 365 days. TRAPPIST-1 e 0.92 Earths 0.62 Earths TRAPPIST-1 h 0.75 Earths 0.35 Earths Star: a very large ball of gas held together by gravity. The central core of a star is extremely hot GJ 179 b 1.24 Jupiters 0.82 Jupiters and produces energy, some of which is released as HD 40307 b 1.83 Earths 4 Earths visible light. HD 180617 b 3.53 Earths 12.20 Earths Backgrounders & Related Materials K2-187 e 2.38 Earths 6.26 Earths Kepler-47 c 4.65 Earths 3.17 Earths Exoplanets overview TRAPPIST-1 scale model https://tinyurl.com/9ddtr7kw https://tinyurl.com/yalkwxy4 Note: data from Eyes on Exoplanets Q&Alien: What's a Pi in the Sky math activity habitable zone? video https://tinyurl.com/y9vu5uyq Earth Jupiter https://tinyurl.com/y8l72a8x Exoplanets resource guide Q&Alien: What's in an https://tinyurl.com/y7w4ytut Radius: 6,378 km or 3,963 mi Radius: 71,492 km or 44,423 mi exoplanet name? video ViewSpace 24 24 Mass: 5.9724×10 kg Mass: 1,898.19×10 kg https://tinyurl.com/yaxqvzgj https://viewspace.org 5 Exoplanet Trading Cards www.universe-of-learning.org NASA's Universe of Learning materials are based upon work supported by NASA under award number NNX16AC65A to the Space Telescope Science Institute, working in partnership with Caltech/IPAC, Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and Sonoma State University. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Recommended publications
  • RADIAL VELOCITIES in the ZODIACAL DUST CLOUD

    RADIAL VELOCITIES in the ZODIACAL DUST CLOUD

    A SURVEY OF RADIAL VELOCITIES in the ZODIACAL DUST CLOUD Brian Harold May Astrophysics Group Department of Physics Imperial College London Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy to Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine London · 2007 · 2 Abstract This thesis documents the building of a pressure-scanned Fabry-Perot Spectrometer, equipped with a photomultiplier and pulse-counting electronics, and its deployment at the Observatorio del Teide at Izaña in Tenerife, at an altitude of 7,700 feet (2567 m), for the purpose of recording high-resolution spectra of the Zodiacal Light. The aim was to achieve the first systematic mapping of the MgI absorption line in the Night Sky, as a function of position in heliocentric coordinates, covering especially the plane of the ecliptic, for a wide variety of elongations from the Sun. More than 250 scans of both morning and evening Zodiacal Light were obtained, in two observing periods – September-October 1971, and April 1972. The scans, as expected, showed profiles modified by components variously Doppler-shifted with respect to the unshifted shape seen in daylight. Unexpectedly, MgI emission was also discovered. These observations covered for the first time a span of elongations from 25º East, through 180º (the Gegenschein), to 27º West, and recorded average shifts of up to six tenths of an angstrom, corresponding to a maximum radial velocity relative to the Earth of about 40 km/s. The set of spectra obtained is in this thesis compared with predictions made from a number of different models of a dust cloud, assuming various distributions of dust density as a function of position and particle size, and differing assumptions about their speed and direction.
  • Enabling Science with Gaia Observations of Naked-Eye Stars

    Enabling Science with Gaia Observations of Naked-Eye Stars

    Enabling science with Gaia observations of naked-eye stars J. Sahlmanna,b, J. Mart´ın-Fleitasb,c, A. Morab,c, A. Abreub,d, C. M. Crowleyb,e, E. Jolietb,f aEuropean Space Agency, STScI, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; bEuropean Space Agency, ESAC, P.O. Box 78, Villanueva de la Canada,˜ 28691 Madrid, Spain; cAurora Technology, Crown Business Centre, Heereweg 345, 2161 CA Lisse, The Netherlands; dElecnor Deimos Space, Ronda de Poniente 19, Ed. Fiteni VI, 28760 Tres Cantos, Madrid, Spain; eHE Space Operations BV, Huygensstraat 44, 2201 DK Noordwijk, The Netherlands; fCalifornia Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA ABSTRACT ESA’s Gaia space astrometry mission is performing an all-sky survey of stellar objects. At the beginning of the nominal mission in July 2014, an operation scheme was adopted that enabled Gaia to routinely acquire observations of all stars brighter than the original limit of G∼6, i.e. the naked-eye stars. Here, we describe the current status and extent of those observations and their on-ground processing. We present an overview of the data products generated for G<6 stars and the potential scientific applications. Finally, we discuss how the Gaia survey could be enhanced by further exploiting the techniques we developed. Keywords: Gaia, Astrometry, Proper motion, Parallax, Bright Stars, Extrasolar planets, CCD 1. INTRODUCTION There are about 6000 stars that can be observed with the unaided human eye. Greek astronomer Hipparchus used these stars to define the magnitude system still in use today, in which the faintest stars had an apparent visual magnitude of 6.
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets

    Naming the Extrasolar Planets

    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
  • Dynamical Stability and Habitability of a Terrestrial Planet in HD74156

    Dynamical Stability and Habitability of a Terrestrial Planet in HD74156

    A dynamic search for potential habitable planets amongst the extrasolar planets 1,2 1 1 1,3 1, 4 P. Hinds , A. Munro , S. T. Maddison , C. Tan , and M. C. Gino [1] Swinburne University, Australia [2] Pierce College, USA [3] Methodist Ladies’ College, Australia [4] Dudley Observatory, USA ABSTRACT: While the detection of habitable terrestrial planets around nearby stars is currently beyond our observational capabilities, dynamical studies can help us locate potential candidates. Following from the work of Menou & Tabachnik (2003), we use a symplectic integrator to search for potential stable terrestrial planetary orbits in the habitable zones of known extrasolar planetary systems. A swarm of massless test particles is initially used to identify stability zones, and then an Earth-mass planet is placed within these zones to investigate their dynamical stability. We investigate 22 new systems discovered since the work of Menou & Tabachnik, as well as simulate some of the previous 85 extrasolar systems whose orbital parameters have been more precisely constrained. In particular, we model three systems that are now confirmed or potential double planetary systems: HD169830, HD160691 and eps Eridani. The results of these dynamical studies can be used as a potential target list for the Terrestrial Planet Finder. Introduction Numerical Technique Results & Discussion To date 122 extrasolar planets have been detected around 107 stars, with 13 of them To follow the evolution of the planetary systems, we use the SWIFT integration software package1. This The systems we have investigated broadly fall in four categories: (1) unstable being multiple planet systems (Schneider, 2004). Observational evidence for the allows us to model a planetary system and a swarm of massless test particles in orbit around a central star.
  • Exep Science Plan Appendix (SPA) (This Document)

    Exep Science Plan Appendix (SPA) (This Document)

    ExEP Science Plan, Rev A JPL D: 1735632 Release Date: February 15, 2019 Page 1 of 61 Created By: David A. Breda Date Program TDEM System Engineer Exoplanet Exploration Program NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Dr. Nick Siegler Date Program Chief Technologist Exoplanet Exploration Program NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Concurred By: Dr. Gary Blackwood Date Program Manager Exoplanet Exploration Program NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology EXOPDr.LANET Douglas Hudgins E XPLORATION PROGRAMDate Program Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program ScienceScience Plan Mission DirectorateAppendix NASA Headquarters Karl Stapelfeldt, Program Chief Scientist Eric Mamajek, Deputy Program Chief Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program JPL CL#19-0790 JPL Document No: 1735632 ExEP Science Plan, Rev A JPL D: 1735632 Release Date: February 15, 2019 Page 2 of 61 Approved by: Dr. Gary Blackwood Date Program Manager, Exoplanet Exploration Program Office NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory Dr. Douglas Hudgins Date Program Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program Science Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters Created by: Dr. Karl Stapelfeldt Chief Program Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program Office NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Dr. Eric Mamajek Deputy Program Chief Scientist Exoplanet Exploration Program Office NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology This research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. © 2018 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Exoplanet Exploration Program JPL CL#19-0790 ExEP Science Plan, Rev A JPL D: 1735632 Release Date: February 15, 2019 Page 3 of 61 Table of Contents 1.
  • Cosmological Aspects of Planetary Habitability

    Cosmological Aspects of Planetary Habitability

    Cosmological aspects of planetary habitability Yu. A. Shchekinov Department of Space Physics, SFU, Rostov on Don, Russia [email protected] M. Safonova, J. Murthy Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bangalore, India [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT The habitable zone (HZ) is defined as the region around a star where a planet can support liquid water on its surface, which, together with an oxygen atmo- sphere, is presumed to be necessary (and sufficient) to develop and sustain life on the planet. Currently, about twenty potentially habitable planets are listed. The most intriguing question driving all these studies is whether planets within habitable zones host extraterrestrial life. It is implicitly assumed that a planet in the habitable zone bears biota. How- ever along with the two usual indicators of habitability, an oxygen atmosphere and liquid water on the surface, an additional one – the age — has to be taken into account when the question of the existence of life (or even a simple biota) on a planet is addressed. The importance of planetary age for the existence of life as we know it follows from the fact that the primary process, the photosynthesis, is endothermic with an activation energy higher than temperatures in habitable zones. Therefore on planets in habitable zones, due to variations in their albedo, orbits, diameters and other crucial parameters, the onset of photosynthesis may arXiv:1404.0641v1 [astro-ph.EP] 2 Apr 2014 take much longer time than the planetary age. Recently, several exoplanets orbiting Population II stars with ages of 12–13 Gyr were discovered.
  • Geodynamics and Rate of Volcanism on Massive Earth-Like Planets

    Geodynamics and Rate of Volcanism on Massive Earth-Like Planets

    The Astrophysical Journal, 700:1732–1749, 2009 August 1 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1732 C 2009. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. GEODYNAMICS AND RATE OF VOLCANISM ON MASSIVE EARTH-LIKE PLANETS E. S. Kite1,3, M. Manga1,3, and E. Gaidos2 1 Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA Received 2008 September 12; accepted 2009 May 29; published 2009 July 16 ABSTRACT We provide estimates of volcanism versus time for planets with Earth-like composition and masses 0.25–25 M⊕, as a step toward predicting atmospheric mass on extrasolar rocky planets. Volcanism requires melting of the silicate mantle. We use a thermal evolution model, calibrated against Earth, in combination with standard melting models, to explore the dependence of convection-driven decompression mantle melting on planet mass. We show that (1) volcanism is likely to proceed on massive planets with plate tectonics over the main-sequence lifetime of the parent star; (2) crustal thickness (and melting rate normalized to planet mass) is weakly dependent on planet mass; (3) stagnant lid planets live fast (they have higher rates of melting than their plate tectonic counterparts early in their thermal evolution), but die young (melting shuts down after a few Gyr); (4) plate tectonics may not operate on high-mass planets because of the production of buoyant crust which is difficult to subduct; and (5) melting is necessary but insufficient for efficient volcanic degassing—volatiles partition into the earliest, deepest melts, which may be denser than the residue and sink to the base of the mantle on young, massive planets.
  • Download Artist's CV

    Download Artist's CV

    I N M A N G A L L E R Y Michael Jones McKean b. 1976, Truk Island, Micronesia Lives and works in New York City, NY and Richmond, VA Education 2002 MFA, Alfred University, Alfred, New York 2000 BFA, Marywood University, Scranton, Pennsylvania Solo Exhibitions 2018-29 (in progress) Twelve Earths, 12 global sites, w/ Fathomers, Los Angeles, CA 2019 The Commune, SuPerDutchess, New York, New York The Raw Morphology, A + B Gallery, Brescia, Italy 2018 UNTMLY MLDS, Art Brussels, Discovery Section, 2017 The Ground, The ContemPorary, Baltimore, MD Proxima Centauri b. Gleise 667 Cc. Kepler-442b. Wolf 1061c. Kepler-1229b. Kapteyn b. Kepler-186f. GJ 273b. TRAPPIST-1e., Galerie Escougnou-Cetraro, Paris, France 2016 Rivers, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA Michael Jones McKean: The Ground, The ContemPorary Museum, Baltimore, MD The Drift, Pittsburgh, PA 2015 a hundred twenty six billion acres, Inman Gallery, Houston, TX three carbon tons, (two-person w/ Jered Sprecher) Zeitgeist Gallery, Nashville, TN 2014 we float above to spit and sing, Emerson Dorsch, Miami, FL Michael Jones McKean and Gilad Efrat, Inman Gallery, at UNTITLED, Miami, FL 2013 The Religion, The Fosdick-Nelson Gallery, Alfred University, Alfred, NY Seven Sculptures, (two person show with Jackie Gendel), Horton Gallery, New York, NY Love and Resources (two person show with Timur Si-Qin), Favorite Goods, Los Angeles, CA 2012 circles become spheres, Gentili APri, Berlin, Germany Certain Principles of Light and Shapes Between Forms, Bernis Center for ContemPorary Art, Omaha, NE
  • Correlations Between the Stellar, Planetary, and Debris Components of Exoplanet Systems Observed by Herschel⋆

    Correlations Between the Stellar, Planetary, and Debris Components of Exoplanet Systems Observed by Herschel⋆

    A&A 565, A15 (2014) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323058 & c ESO 2014 Astrophysics Correlations between the stellar, planetary, and debris components of exoplanet systems observed by Herschel J. P. Marshall1,2, A. Moro-Martín3,4, C. Eiroa1, G. Kennedy5,A.Mora6, B. Sibthorpe7, J.-F. Lestrade8, J. Maldonado1,9, J. Sanz-Forcada10,M.C.Wyatt5,B.Matthews11,12,J.Horner2,13,14, B. Montesinos10,G.Bryden15, C. del Burgo16,J.S.Greaves17,R.J.Ivison18,19, G. Meeus1, G. Olofsson20, G. L. Pilbratt21, and G. J. White22,23 (Affiliations can be found after the references) Received 15 November 2013 / Accepted 6 March 2014 ABSTRACT Context. Stars form surrounded by gas- and dust-rich protoplanetary discs. Generally, these discs dissipate over a few (3–10) Myr, leaving a faint tenuous debris disc composed of second-generation dust produced by the attrition of larger bodies formed in the protoplanetary disc. Giant planets detected in radial velocity and transit surveys of main-sequence stars also form within the protoplanetary disc, whilst super-Earths now detectable may form once the gas has dissipated. Our own solar system, with its eight planets and two debris belts, is a prime example of an end state of this process. Aims. The Herschel DEBRIS, DUNES, and GT programmes observed 37 exoplanet host stars within 25 pc at 70, 100, and 160 μm with the sensitiv- ity to detect far-infrared excess emission at flux density levels only an order of magnitude greater than that of the solar system’s Edgeworth-Kuiper belt. Here we present an analysis of that sample, using it to more accurately determine the (possible) level of dust emission from these exoplanet host stars and thereafter determine the links between the various components of these exoplanetary systems through statistical analysis.
  • Astronomy 2015 Sample Test.Pdf

    Astronomy 2015 Sample Test.Pdf

    Science Olympiad Astronomy C Division Event Sample Exam Stellar Evolution: Star and Planet Formation 2014-2015 Team Number: Team Name: Instructions: 1) Please turn in all materials at the end of the event. 2) Do not forget to put your team name and team number at the top of all answer pages. 3) Write all answers on the answer pages. Any marks elsewhere will not be scored. 4) All quantitative answers are expected to have a precision of 3 or more significant figures. 5) Please do not access the internet during the event. If you do so, your team will be disqualified. 6) This test was downloaded from: www.aavso.org/science-olympiad-2015. 7) Good luck! And may the stars be with you! 1 Section A: Use Image/Illustration Set A to answer Questions 1-19. This section focuses on qualitative understanding of stellar evolution, specifically relating to star formation and planets. 1. A schematic of a T-Tauri star is shown in Image A1. (a) Which point (A-F) marks the location of the disk surrounding the protostar? (b) Which point (A-F) displays the bipolar outflow that may form Herbig-Haro objects? (c) Which point (A-F) shows the strongly variable hot spots on the protostar? 2. A color-magnitude diagram for a sample of brown dwarfs is shown in Image A2. The x-axis shows the J-K color index, while the y-axis displays J-band magnitude. The different colors represent different brown dwarf spectral types. (a) Which lettered region (A-D) corresponds approximately to a spectral type L2 brown dwarf? (b) Which lettered region (A-D) corresponds approximately to a spectral type T6 brown dwarf? (c) Which lettered region (A-D) corresponds approximately to the brown dwarf L-T type transition? 3.
  • 18Th EANA Conference European Astrobiology Network Association

    18Th EANA Conference European Astrobiology Network Association

    18th EANA Conference European Astrobiology Network Association Abstract book 24-28 September 2018 Freie Universität Berlin, Germany Sponsors: Detectability of biosignatures in martian sedimentary systems A. H. Stevens1, A. McDonald2, and C. S. Cockell1 (1) UK Centre for Astrobiology, University of Edinburgh, UK ([email protected]) (2) Bioimaging Facility, School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, UK Presentation: Tuesday 12:45-13:00 Session: Traces of life, biosignatures, life detection Abstract: Some of the most promising potential sampling sites for astrobiology are the numerous sedimentary areas on Mars such as those explored by MSL. As sedimentary systems have a high relative likelihood to have been habitable in the past and are known on Earth to preserve biosignatures well, the remains of martian sedimentary systems are an attractive target for exploration, for example by sample return caching rovers [1]. To learn how best to look for evidence of life in these environments, we must carefully understand their context. While recent measurements have raised the upper limit for organic carbon measured in martian sediments [2], our exploration to date shows no evidence for a terrestrial-like biosphere on Mars. We used an analogue of a martian mudstone (Y-Mars[3]) to investigate how best to look for biosignatures in martian sedimentary environments. The mudstone was inoculated with a relevant microbial community and cultured over several months under martian conditions to select for the most Mars-relevant microbes. We sequenced the microbial community over a number of transfers to try and understand what types microbes might be expected to exist in these environments and assess whether they might leave behind any specific biosignatures.
  • 1 Director's Message

    1 Director's Message

    1 Director’s Message Markus Kissler-Patig 3 Weighing the Black Hole in M101 ULX-1 Stephen Justham and Jifeng Liu 8 World’s Most Powerful Planet Finder Turns its Eye to the Sky: First Light with the Gemini Planet Imager Bruce Macintosh and Peter Michaud 12 Science Highlights Nancy A. Levenson 15 Operations Corner: Update and 2013 Review Andy Adamson 20 Instrumentation Development: Update and 2013 Review Scot Kleinman ON THE COVER: GeminiFocus January 2014 The cover of this issue GeminiFocus is a quarterly publication of Gemini Observatory features first light images from the Gemini 670 N. A‘ohoku Place, Hilo, Hawai‘i 96720 USA Planet Imager that Phone: (808) 974-2500 Fax: (808) 974-2589 were released at the Online viewing address: January 2014 meeting www.gemini.edu/geminifocus of the American Managing Editor: Peter Michaud Astronomical Society Science Editor: Nancy A. Levenson held in Washington, D.C. Associate Editor: Stephen James O’Meara See the press release Designer: Eve Furchgott / Blue Heron Multimedia that accompanied the images starting on Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations page 8 of this issue. expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Markus Kissler-Patig Director’s Message 2013: A Successful Year for Gemini! As 2013 comes to an end, we can look back at 12 very successful months for Gemini despite strong budget constraints. Indeed, 2013 was the first stage of our three-year transition to a reduced opera- tions budget, and it was marked by a roughly 20 percent cut in contributions from Gemini’s partner countries.