Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 237 / Wednesday, December 9, 2020 / Notices 79165

Comment 9: The Benchmark for Ocean 48. Tianneng Yingli New Energy Resources 2020, one company claiming that it had Freight Co., Ltd. no shipments under review contended Comment 10: Commerce’s Use of ‘‘Zeroing’’ 49. Toenergy Technology Hangzhou Co., Ltd. that in the Final Results Commerce in Benefit Calculations 50. Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science & Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should Technology Co., Ltd. incorrectly identified it as ‘‘LERRI Solar Correct Errors to Sales Denominators and 51. Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. (formerly Technology Co., Ltd’’ (LERRI) and that the Attribution of Subsidies known as Changzhou Trina Solar Energy its correct name is ‘‘LONGi Solar XII. Recommendation Co., Ltd.) Technology Co. Ltd. (a.k.a. LERRI Solar 52. Turpan Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. 2 Appendix II Technology Co., Ltd.).’’ On October 6, 53. Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd. 2020, Trina 3 and Risen 4 submitted Non-Selected Companies Under Review 54. Wuxi Tianran Photovoltaic Co., Ltd. 5 55. Yancheng Trina Solar Energy Technology timely ministerial error comments. 1. Anji DaSol Solar Energy Science & Co., Ltd. Specifically, Trina and Risen allege that Technology Co., Ltd. 56. Yingli Energy (China) Co., Ltd. we applied the incorrect amount in 2. Baoding Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd. 57. Yingli Green Energy Holding Company valuing their tempered glass inputs. 3. Baoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy Limited Risen also alleges that we incorrectly Resources Co., Ltd. 58. Yingli Green Energy International valued its junction box inputs and 4. Beijing Tianneng Yingli New Energy Trading Company Limited incorrectly calculated the surrogate Resources Co., Ltd. 59. Zhejiang ERA Solar Technology Co., Ltd. 60. Zhejiang Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. financial ratios. On October 12, 2020, 5. BYD (Shangluo) Industrial Co., Ltd. SunPower Manufacturing Oregon LLC 6. Canadian Solar (USA) Inc. [FR Doc. 2020–27037 Filed 12–8–20; 8:45 am] (the petitioner) submitted a timely 7. Canadian Solar Inc. BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 8. Canadian Solar International Ltd. rebuttal proposing an alternative to 9. Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Changshu) Trina and Risen’s suggest valuation of Inc. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE tempered glass, arguing that there was 10. Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Luoyang) no ministerial error in the valuation of Inc. International Trade Administration Risen junction boxes, and asserting that 11. Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang Energy Co., Ltd. [A–570–979] labor was omitted from the calculation 6 12. CSI Cells Co., Ltd. of surrogate financial ratios. 13. CSI–GCL Solar Manufacturing Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Scope of the Order (Yancheng) Co., Ltd. Whether or Not Assembled Into 14. De-Tech Trading Limited HK Modules, From the People’s Republic The merchandise covered by the order 15. Dongguan Sunworth Solar Energy Co., of China: Notice of Correction to the Ltd. is crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, 16. Eoplly New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Final Results of the 2017–2018 and modules, laminates, and panels, 17. ERA Solar Co., Ltd. Antidumping Duty Administrative consisting of crystalline silicon 18. ET Solar Energy Limited Review photovoltaic cells, whether or not 19. Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources Co., AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, partially or fully assembled into other Ltd. products, including, but not limited to, 20. Hangzhou Sunny Energy Science and International Trade Administration, Technology Co., Ltd. Department of Commerce. modules, laminates, panels and building 21. Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Ltd. People’s Republic of China: Final Results of (Commerce) is correcting its notice of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 22. Hengshui Yingli New Energy Resources the final results of the sixth Co., Ltd. Final Determination of No Shipments; 2017–2018, 23. Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. administrative review of the 85 FR 62275 (October 2, 2020) (Final Results), and antidumping duty (AD) order on accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum 24. JA Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd. (IDM). 25. Jiangsu High Hope Int’l Group crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, 2 See LERRI’s Letter, ‘‘LONGi Request for 26. Jiawei Solarchina (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. whether or not assembled into modules Correction of Clerical Error in the Final Results 27. Jiawei Solarchina Co., Ltd. (solar cells), from the People’s Republic including Customs Instructions,’’ dated September 28. Jinko Solar (U.S.) Inc. of China (China). The period of review 30, 2020. 29. Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. (POR) is December 1, 2017 through 3 As noted in the Final Results, we are treating 30. Jinko Solar Import and Export Co., Ltd. November 30, 2018. Trina Solar Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar (Changzhou) 31. Jinko Solar International Limited Science and Technology Co., Ltd.; Yancheng Trina 32. LERRI Solar Technology Co., Ltd. DATES: Applicable December 9, 2020. Guoneng Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd 33. Lightway Green New Energy Co., Ltd. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (formerly, Yancheng Trina Solar Energy Technology Jeff Co., Ltd.); Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang Energy 34. Lixian Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, Office Ltd. Co., Ltd.; Turpan Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; IV, Enforcement & Compliance, Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar 35. Luoyang Suntech Power Co., Ltd. International Trade Administration, (Hefei) Science and Technology Co., Ltd.; and 36. Nice Sun PV Co., Ltd. Changzhou Trina Hezhong Photoelectric Co., Ltd. 37. Ningbo ETDZ Holdings, Ltd. Department of Commerce, 1401 (collectively Trina) as a single entity. 38. Ningbo Qixin Solar Electrical Appliance Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 4 As noted in the Final Results, we are treating Co., Ltd. DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2769. Risen Energy Co., Ltd.; Risen (Wuhai) New Energy 39. Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Twinsel Electronic Technology 40. Shenzhen Sungold Solar Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd.; Risen (Luoyang) New Energy Co., Ltd.; 41. Shenzhen Yingli New Energy Resources Background Jiujiang Shengchao Xinye Technology Co., Ltd.; Co., Ltd. Jiujiang Shengzhao Xinye Trade Co., Ltd. Ruichang 42. Sumec Hardware & Tools Co., Ltd. On October 2, 2020, Commerce Branch, and Risen Energy (HongKong) Co., Ltd. (collectively Risen) as a single entity. 43. Sunpreme Solar Technology (Jiaxing) Co., published the final results of the 2017– Barcode. Ltd. 2018 administrative review of the AD 5 See Risen’s Letter, ‘‘Risen Ministerial Error 44. Systemes Versilis, Inc. order on solar cells from China in the Comments,’’ dated October 6, 2020; see also Trina’s 1 45. Taizhou BD Trade Co., Ltd. Federal Register. On September 30, Letter, ‘‘Ministerial Error Allegation,’’ dated 46. TenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. October 6, 2020. 47. Tianjin Yingli New Energy Resources Co., 1 See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 6 See Petitioner’s Letter ‘‘Response to Ministerial Ltd. Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the Error Allegations,’’ dated October 12, 2020.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:16 Dec 08, 2020 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM 09DEN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES 79166 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 237 / Wednesday, December 9, 2020 / Notices

integrated materials.7 Merchandise 7007.19.80 to be 1.87 euros per kg, and the name that we used to identify covered by the order is classifiable we have corrected for this error in our LERRI. Because a review was requested under subheading 8501.61.0000, calculation by valuing tempered glass and initiated under the name LERRI,11 8507.20.80, 8541.40.6020, 8541.40.6030, using the 1.87 euros per kg amount. our no shipments determination applies and 8501.31.8000 of the Harmonized (2) As accurately noted by Risen, we with respect to that name and we used Tariff Schedule of the United States determined in the Final Results that that name in the Final Results. Thus, (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS ‘‘Malaysian HTS 8544.42.9400 and HTS our omission of the other company subheadings are provided for 8544.60.1100 most closely correspond name was correct. convenience and customs purposes, our with the various junction boxes used by written description of the scope of the Risen.’’ 10 However, we stated that data We also disagree with Risen’s order is dispositive. for Malaysian imports of HTS contention that we committed a 8544.42.9400 were not on the record ministerial error by incorrectly Ministerial Errors and so it was not possible to average the classifying certain expenses in Section 351.224(e) of Commerce’s values under Malaysian HTS calculating the surrogate financial regulations provides that Commerce 8544.42.9400 with the values under ratios. Risen’s argument is will analyze any comments received Malaysian HTS 8544.60.1100. We thus methodological in nature. and, if appropriate, correct any relied solely on Malaysian imports of ministerial error by amending the final HTS 8544.60.1100 to value Risen’s Separate Rates determination or the final results of the junction box consumption. However, In the Final Results we found that review. Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act data for Malaysian imports of HTS Trina, Risen, and 16 other companies/ of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 8544.42.9400 were in fact on the record company groups were eligible for a CFR 351.224(f) define a ‘‘ministerial and so we have corrected this error by error’’ as an error ‘‘in addition, relying on an simple average of separate rate. Commerce assigned a subtraction, or other arithmetic Malaysian imports of HTS 8544.42.9400 dumping margin to the separate rate function, clerical error resulting from and HTS 8544.60.1100 to value Risen’s companies that it did not individually inaccurate copying, duplication, or the consumption of junction boxes. examine, but which demonstrated their like, and any other similar type of (3) We failed to identify that the Risen eligibility for a separate rate, based on unintentional error which the Secretary collapsed entity included Risen Energy the mandatory respondents’ dumping considers ministerial.’’ (Changzhou) Co., Ltd. in the rate section margins.12 Because Trina’s and Risen’s We analyzed the ministerial error of the Final Results. We have corrected margins have changed due to the comments and determined, in for this by adding Risen Energy correction of ministerial errors, we have accordance with section 751(h) of the (Changzhou) Co., Ltd. to the Risen recalculated the rate assigned to the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e) and (f), that collapsed entity in the rate section. non-individually examined separate rate we made the following ministerial (4) We failed to include, in the companies.13 errors: 8 calculation of Trina’s normal value, the (1) In the Final Results, we stated our cost of the silver paste consumed by Amended Final Results of Review intention to value tempered glass using Trina. We have corrected for this error Romanian imports of HTS 7007.19.80.9 by including this cost in the calculation As a result of correcting the four However, we incorrectly applied a value of Trina’s normal value. ministerial errors discussed above, we of 2.19 euros per kilogram (kg). Record We found that we did not commit a determine that the following weighted- evidence demonstrates the average unit ministerial error by not including average dumping margins exist for the value of Romanian imports of HTS ‘‘LONGi Solar Technology Co. Ltd.’’ in POR:

Weighted- average Producers/exporters dumping margin (percent)

Trina Solar Co., Ltd./Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science and Technology Co., Ltd./Yancheng Trina Guoneng Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd./Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang Energy Co., Ltd./Turpan Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd./Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd./Trina Solar (Hefei) Science and Technology Co., Ltd./Changzhou Trina Hezhong Photoelectric Co., Ltd ...... 92.52 Risen Energy Co. Ltd./Risen (Wuhai) New Energy Co., Ltd./Zhejiang Twinsel Electronic Technology Co., Ltd./Risen (Luoyang) New Energy Co., Ltd./Jiujiang Shengchao Xinye Technology Co., Ltd./Jiujiang Shengzhao Xinye Trade Co., Ltd./Ruichang Branch, Risen Energy (HongKong) Co., Ltd./Risen Energy (Changzhou) Co., Ltd ...... 100.79 Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies: Anji DaSol Solar Energy Science & Technology Co., Ltd ...... 95.50 Canadian Solar International Limited/Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Changshu), Inc./Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Luoyang) Inc./ CSI Cells Co., Ltd./CSI–GCL Solar Manufacturing (YanCheng) Co., Ltd./CSI Solar Power (China) Inc. (Canadian Solar) ...... 95.50 JA Solar Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd ...... 95.50 Jiawei Solarchina Co., Ltd ...... 95.50 JingAo Solar Co., Ltd ...... 95.50 Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. (Jinko) ...... 95.50 Jinko Solar Import and Export Co., Ltd. (Jinko I&E) ...... 95.50

7 For a complete description of the scope of the 11 See Initiation of Antidumping and or based entirely on facts available. See section order, see Final Results IDM. Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. See Memorandum, 8 See Memorandum, ‘‘Allegations of Ministerial 9297 (March 14, 2019). ‘‘Amended Calculation of the Cash Deposit Rate for Errors in the Final Results,’’ dated concurrently 12 See Final Results, 85 at 62276. Non-Reviewed Companies,’’ dated concurrently with this notice. 13 This rate is based on the rates for the with this notice. 9 See Final Results IDM at Comment 3. respondents that were selected for individual 10 See Final Results IDM at Comment 8. review, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis,

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:16 Dec 08, 2020 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM 09DEN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 237 / Wednesday, December 9, 2020 / Notices 79167

Weighted- average Producers/exporters dumping margin (percent)

Jinko Solar International Limited (Jinko Int’l) ...... 95.50 Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd ...... 95.50 Shanghai JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd ...... 95.50 Shenzhen Portable Electronic Technology Co., Ltd ...... 95.50 Shenzhen Sungold Solar Co., Ltd ...... 95.50 Wuxi Tianran Photovoltaic Co., Ltd ...... 95.50 Yingli Energy (China) Company Limited/Baoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Tianjin Yingli New Energy Re- sources Co., Ltd./Hengshui Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Lixian Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Baoding Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd./Beijing Tianneng Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Shenzhen Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd ...... 95.50 Zhejiang Jinko Solar Co., Ltd ...... 95.50 Zhejiang Sunflower Light Energy Science & Technology Limited Liability Company ...... 95.50

Commerce’s policy regarding importer or customer and dividing this Cash Deposit Requirements conditional review of the China-wide amount by the total entered value of the The following cash deposit 16 entity applies to this administrative sales to the importer or customer. requirements will be effective upon 14 review. Under this policy, the China- Where we calculated an importer- or publication of the amended final results wide entity will not be under review customer-specific weighted-average of this administrative review for unless a party specifically requests, or dumping margin by dividing the total shipments of the subject merchandise Commerce self-initiates, a review of the amount of dumping for reviewed sales from China entered, or withdrawn from entity. Because no party requested a to the importer or customer by the total warehouse, for consumption on or after review of the China-wide entity, and we sales quantity associated with those the publication date of this notice in the did not self-initiate a review of the transactions, we will direct CBP to Federal Register, as provided by section entity, the entity is not under review, assess importer- or customer-specific 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the and the entity’s dumping margin (i.e., assessment rates based on the resulting 17 exporters listed in the table in the 238.95 percent) is not subject to change per-unit rates. Where an importer- or ‘‘Amended Final Results of Review’’ as a result of this review.15 customer- specific ad valorem or per- section above, the cash deposit rate will unit rate is greater than de minimis, we Assessment be the rate listed for each exporter in the will instruct CBP to collect the table, except if the rate is zero or de We will determine, and U.S. Customs appropriate duties at the time of minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), then and Border Protection (CBP) shall liquidation. Where either the the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for respondent’s weighted average dumping assess, antidumping duties on all previously investigated Chinese and margin is zero or de minimis, or an appropriate entries covered by this non-Chinese exporters that received a importer or customer-specific ad review. We intend to issue assessment separate rate in a prior segment of this valorem or per-unit rate is zero or de instructions to CBP 15 days after the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will minimis, we will instruct CBP to publication date of these amended final continue to be the existing exporter- liquidate appropriate entries without results of review. In accordance with 19 specific rate; (3) for all Chinese regard to antidumping duties.18 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we are calculating exporters of subject merchandise that importer- or customer-specific For merchandise whose sale/entry was not reported in the U.S. sales have not been found to be entitled to a assessment rates for the merchandise separate rate, the cash deposit rate will subject to this review. For any database submitted by an exporter individually examined during this be the rate previously established for the individually examined respondent China-wide entity (i.e., 238.95 percent); whose weighted-average dumping review, but that entered under the case number of that exporter (i.e., at the and (4) for all non-China exporters of margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 subject merchandise which have not percent), we will calculate importer- or individually-examined exporter’s cash deposit rate), we will instruct CBP to received their own rate, the cash deposit customer-specific assessment rates for rate will be the rate applicable to the merchandise subject to this review. liquidate such entries at the China-wide rate. Additionally, if we determine that Chinese exporter that supplied the non- Where the respondent reported reliable Chinese exporter. These deposit entered values, we calculated importer- an exporter under review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, requirements, when imposed, shall or customer-specific ad valorem rates by remain in effect until further notice. aggregating the dumping margins any suspended entries that entered calculated for all U.S. sales to the under that exporter’s case number will Disclosure 19 be liquidated at the China-wide rate. We intend to disclose the calculations 14 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement performed for these amended final 16 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). of Change in Department Practice for Respondent results within five days of publication of Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 17 Id. Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 18 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of this notice in the Federal Register in Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). FR 65963, 65969–70 (November 4, 2013). Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 15 See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 Notification to Importers Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the (February 14, 2012). This notice also serves as a reminder People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 19 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 to importers of their responsibility Final Determination of No Shipments; 2015–2016, FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), for a full discussion under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 83 FR 35616 (July 27, 2018). of this practice. certificate regarding the reimbursement

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:16 Dec 08, 2020 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM 09DEN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES 79168 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 237 / Wednesday, December 9, 2020 / Notices

of antidumping duties prior to NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: Assessment liquidation of the relevant entries (202) 482–5166. during this POR. Failure to comply with SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs this requirement could result in and Border Protection (CBP) to assess Commerce’s presumption that Background antidumping duties on all appropriate reimbursement of antidumping duties On August 4, 2020, Commerce entries of PRCBs from China during the occurred and the subsequent assessment published a notice of opportunity to POR at rates equal to the cash deposit of double antidumping duties. request an administrative review of the rate of estimated antidumping duties antidumping duty order on PRCBs from required at the time of entry, or Administrative Protective Orders China for the POR August 1, 2019, withdrawal from warehouse, for This notice also serves as a reminder through July 31, 2020.1 On August 31, consumption, in accordance with 19 to parties subject to administrative 2020, the petitioners 2 timely requested CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends protective order (APO) of their an administrative review of the to issue appropriate assessment responsibility concerning the return or antidumping duty order with respect to instructions to CBP 15 days after destruction of proprietary information Dongguan Nozawa Plastics Products publication of this notice in the Federal disclosed under APO in accordance Co., Ltd. and United Power Packaging, Register. with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues Ltd. (collectively, Nozawa), and Crown to govern business proprietary Polyethylene Products (International) Notification to Importers information in this segment of the Ltd. (Crown).3 Commerce received no proceeding. Timely written notification other requests for an administrative This notice serves as a final reminder of the return or destruction of APO review of the antidumping duty order. to importers of their responsibility materials, or conversion to judicial On October 6, 2020, pursuant to section under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a protective order, is hereby requested. 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as certificate regarding the reimbursement Failure to comply with the regulations amended (the Act), and 19 CFR of antidumping duties prior to and terms of an APO is a violation 351.221(c)(1)(i), we published in the liquidation of the relevant entries which is subject to sanction. Federal Register a notice of initiation of during this review period. Failure to These corrections to the final results an administrative review of the comply with this requirement could and notice are issued and published in antidumping duty order on PRCBs from result in Commerce’s presumption that accordance with sections 751(a) and China with respect to Nozawa and reimbursement of antidumping duties 777(i) of the Act. Crown (the respondents).4 On occurred and the subsequent assessment Dated: November 2, 2020. November 16, 2020, the petitioners of doubled antidumping duties. timely withdrew their administrative Jeffrey I. Kessler, review request for Nozawa and Crown.5 Notification Regarding Administrative Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Protective Order Compliance. Rescission of Administrative Review [FR Doc. 2020–27030 Filed 12–8–20; 8:45 am] Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), This notice also serves as a reminder BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Commerce will rescind an to parties subject to administrative administrative review, in whole or in protective order (APO) of their part, if a party that requested a review responsibility concerning the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE withdraws the request within 90 days of disposition of proprietary information the date of publication of notice of International Trade Administration disclosed under APO in accordance initiation of the requested review. The with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely [A–570–886] petitioners withdrew their request for written notification of the return or review within 90 days of the publication destruction of APO materials or Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From date of the Initiation Notice. No other conversion to judicial protective order is the People’s Republic of China: parties requested an administrative hereby requested. Failure to comply Rescission of Antidumping Duty review of the antidumping duty order. with the regulations and the terms of an Administrative Review; 2019–2020 Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR APO is a sanctionable violation. 351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding the AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, administrative review of the International Trade Administration, Notification to Interested Parties antidumping order on PRCBs from Department of Commerce. China for the period August 1, 2019, This notice is issued and published in SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce through July 31, 2020, in its entirety. accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and (Commerce) is rescinding the 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR administrative review of the 1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 351.213(d)(4). antidumping duty order on Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity polyethylene retail carrier bags (PRCBs) to Request Administrative Review, 85 FR 47167 Dated: December 4, 2020. from the People’s Republic of China (August 4, 2020). James Maeder, 2 The petitioners are the Polyethylene Retail (China) covering the period of review Carrier Bag Committee and its individual members, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping (POR) August 1, 2019, through July 31, Hilex Poly Co., LLC and Superbag Corporation. and Countervailing Duty Operations. 2020, based on the timely withdrawal of 3 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene Retail [FR Doc. 2020–27026 Filed 12–8–20; 8:45 am] Carrier Bags from the People’s Republic of China: the request for review. BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated August DATES : Applicable December 9, 2020. 31, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 4 See Initiation of Antidumping and Christopher Williams, AD/CVD Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR Operations, Office I, Enforcement and 63081 (October 6, 2020) (Initiation Notice). 5 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene Retail Compliance, International Trade Carrier Bags from the People’s Republic of China: Administration, U.S. Department of Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,’’ Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue dated November 16,2020.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:16 Dec 08, 2020 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM 09DEN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES