DOCSLIB.ORG

~Tatt Nf Idtnntsstt :Hnust Nf Lttprtstntatiuts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
~Tatt Nf Idtnntsstt :Hnust Nf Lttprtstntatiuts JOHN RAY CLEMMONS STATE REPRESENTATIVE COMMITTEES 55 DISTRICT EDUCATION HEALTH ~tatt nf IDtnntsstt NAMING, DESIGNATING & PRIVATE ACTS CORDELL HULL BUILDING SUITE 408 425 FfFTH AVENUE NORTH. SUBCOMMITTEES . TN 37243 NASHVILLE HIGHER EDUCATION (615) 74 1-4410 :Hnust nf lttprtstntatiuts MENTAL HEALTH & SUBSTANCE ABUSE rep.john .ray.clemmons@capitol .tn .gov January 5, 2021 Mr_ Tre Hargett Tennessee Secretary of State State Capitol, First Floor Nashville, TN 37243-1102 Dear Secretary Hargett, You have evidenced your intention to seek re-election to the office of Secretary of State in 1h writing and requested the support of me and my state legislative colleagues. T he 112 General Assembly is currently scheduled to convene for the purpose of electing constitutional o fficers on Wednesday, January 13, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. The Tennessee Secretary of State is statutorily charged with numerous election-related functions, including but not limited to providing administrative oversight of the state election commission and appointing the coordinator of elections. Additionally, you have routinely personally i.nvoh·ed yourself, your office and those in your charge in voting rights and election-related legislation and matters before the Tennessee House of Representatives. For these reasons, my constituents and I would sincerely appreciate receiving a response to the following questions in writing prior to noon on January 12, 2021. 1. D o you support the decision of Senator Marsha Blackbum and Senator Bill Hagerty to vote to oppose the results of the Electoral College. Yes or no? Why? 1h 2. On December 30, 2020, 23 members of the 112 General Assembly penned a letter alleging that presidential "election fraud is widespread" and that "the types of fraud and irregularities are numerous" in six states. These same members also called on Republican members of the Tennessee congressional delegation to object to electors from those select states and conduct an investigation into "widespread elections irregularities." Do you agree with the allegations set forth in this correspondence? Yes or No? 3. Do you have knowledge of any facts or law that would support any of the requests set forth in the 23 Assembly members' December 30'" correspondence? Yes or No? 4. On December 9, 2020, in response to the Tennessee Attorney General's announcement that he had joined an Amicus Brief supporting a Texas election lawsuit contesting 2020 election results in four states, you tweeted, "Considerable thought went into this decision to join the amicus brief, and our office supports its filing." Please explain your personal role or any communications you had with the Attorney General, Governor, or anyone 1 regarding Gen. Slatery's decision prior to the time he announced his decision to join a case that was promptly tossed by the U.S. Supreme Court two days later. 5. With regard to the above matter, please explain the reason you and the office of the Tennessee Secretary of State "support[ed] its filing," as stated in your Twitter post. 6. You are a member of the National Association of Secretaries of State. Since the presidential election, have you, in any way, publicly or privately communicated with any of the following NASS colleagues or their offices in any manner: Secretary Katie Hobbs (AZ), Secretary Brad Raffenseperger (GA), Secretary Jocelyn Benson (MI), Secretary Barbara Cegavske (NV), Secretary Kathy Boockvar (PA), or Secretary Douglas La Follette (WI)? Yes or no? If yes, with whom and for what purpose? 7. You and/or your coordinator of elections have routinely appeared in House committees to argue that "election fraud" is the reason for a number of voting and election-related laws enacted since 2010. Please provide me with the number of convictions for any type of election fraud or substantiated claims of election fraud since 2000 or whatever timeline you feel best supports your position that election fraud is an issue supporting the enactment of any relevant laws since 2010. 8. In 2019, you and your coordinator of elections strongly supported, advocated and lobbied for a law that restricted and imposed criminal and civil penalties on community voter registration efforts. In 2020, after a federal court issued an injunction temporarily preventing the law from taking effect, the General Assembly passed another law stripping out the provisions deemed unconstitutional. Do you still support the 2019 legislation, as originally enacted? Yes or no? As you know, the general public lacks the opportunity to question you and unfortunately has no direct vote for the Secretary of State. For this reason, we are constitutionally charged with representing their will in this important regard. Because there is currently no formal opportunity for legislators to question candidates for constitutional offices in a public setting prior to the vote, we pose these questions to you in this manner with full expectation of straightforward replies. These represent but a few of the many questions our constituents have for you. Should you require clarification of any of the above, please do not hesitate to request same in writing in a timely manner. We anticipate timely receipt of your answers to all of the above. Thanks, in advance. ans !alive 2 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aow 2021 14 No Voter Fraud
    1. Mark your confusion. 2. Show evidence of a close reading. 3. Write a 1+ page reflection. The Times Called Officials in Every State: No Evidence of Voter Fraud The president and his allies have baselessly claimed that rampant voter fraud stole victory from him. Officials contacted by The Times said that there were no irregularities that affected the outcome. Source: Nick Corasanti, Reid J. Epstein and Jim Rutenberg, New York Times, November 12, 2020 PHILADELPHIA — Election officials in dozens of states representing both political parties said that there was no evidence that fraud or other irregularities played a role in the outcome of the presidential race, amounting to a forceful rebuke of President Trump’s portrait of a fraudulent election. Over the last several days, the president, members of his administration, congressional Republicans and right wing allies have put forth the false claim that the election was stolen from Mr. Trump and have refused to accept results that showed Joseph R. Biden Jr. as the winner. But top election officials across the country said in interviews and statements that the process had been a remarkable success despite record turnout and the complications of a dangerous pandemic. “There’s a great human capacity for inventing things that aren’t true about elections,” said Frank LaRose, a Republican who serves as Ohio’s secretary of state. “The conspiracy theories and rumors and all those things run rampant. For some reason, elections breed that type of mythology.” “Kansas did not experience any widespread, systematic issues with voter fraud, intimidation, irregularities or voting problems,” a spokeswoman for Scott Schwab, the Republican secretary of state in Kansas, said in an email Tuesday.
    [Show full text]
  • John H. Merrill Secretary of State
    ALABAMA STATE CAPITOL (334) 242-7200 600 DEXTER AVENUE FAX (334) 242-4993 SUITE S-105 WWW.SOS.ALABAMA.GOV MONTGOMERY, AL 36130 [email protected] JOHN H. MERRILL SECRETARY OF STATE October 2, 2020 Senator Mitch McConnell 317 Russell S.O.B. Washington, DC 20510 Dear Majority Leader McConnell: Thank you for your swift action to hold hearings and to make certain that each Senator has the opportunity to consider the President’s nomination to fill the open seat on the Supreme Court of the United States. It is of utmost importance that the Supreme Court has a full nine-member court before Election Day on November 3, 2020. Maintaining the integrity and credibility of our elections is of paramount significance to each of us as our state’s respective chief election official. Americans must be able to exercise their constitutional right to vote with confidence, knowing their ballot will be counted for the candidate of their choice. In the case an election issue is challenged in court, America cannot afford a tie vote. We must be able to report election results in a timely, secure, and efficient manner as we have done before. The Honorable Amy Coney Barrett is an outstanding nominee for consideration for a vacancy on the Supreme Court of the United States. She brings with her an unblemished record and extensive experience as a litigator and distinguished professor of law at the University of Notre Dame. Her philosophy and tried and true beliefs of upholding the constitution and the laws of our nation as written make her an excellent choice for our nation’s highest court.
    [Show full text]
  • NASS Resolution on Threats of Violence Toward Election Officials and Election Workers
    NASS Resolution on Threats of Violence Toward Election Officials and Election Workers Introduced by Hon. Kyle Ardoin (R-LA) Co-Sponsored for Introduction by: Hon. Kevin Meyer (R-AK) Hon. John Merrill (R-AL) Hon. Jena Griswold (D-CO) Hon. Paul Pate (R-IA) Hon. Scott Schwab (R-KS) Hon. Michael Adams (R-KY) Hon. Jocelyn Benson (D-MI) Hon. Steve Simon (D-MN) Hon. Michael Watson (R-MS) Hon. Al Jaeger (R-ND) Hon. Maggie Toulouse Oliver (D-NM) Hon. Barbara Cegavske (R-NV) Hon. Shemia Fagan (D-OR) Hon. Kim Wyman (R-WA) WHEREAS, the 2020 election cycle was the most challenging in recent memory, with a global pandemic and multiple natural disasters affecting numerous states and their election infrastructure and processes; and WHEREAS, election workers across the country worked tirelessly under difficult conditions to ensure a fair, safe and accurate election for the more than 155 million voters in November; and WHEREAS, based upon unrelenting misinformation and disinformation from both domestic and foreign sources, extremists have taken to threatening and endangering election workers, from Secretaries of State, state election directors, local election officials and election workers; and WHEREAS, the cornerstone of our republic is the right of Americans to vote in a safe, secure and accurate election, and their exercising of that right; and WHEREAS, election workers are a vital part of ensuring the exercise of that right for all eligible Americans; and WHEREAS, violence and violent threats directed at Secretaries of State, their families, staff, and other election workers is abhorrent and the antithesis of what our nation stands for.
    [Show full text]
  • John H. Merrill Secretary of State
    ALABAMA STATE CAPITOL (334) 242-7200 600 DEXTER AVENUE FAX (334) 242-4993 SUITE S-105 WWW.SOS.ALABAMA.GOV MONTGOMERY, AL 36130 [email protected] JOHN H. MERRILL SECRETARY OF STATE February 22, 2021 The Honorable Chuck Schumer The Honorable Mitch McConnell Majority Leader Minority Leader United States Senate United States Senate 322 Hart S.O.B. 317 Russell S.O.B. Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Kevin McCarthy Speaker of the House Minority Leader of the House House of Representatives House of Representatives 1236 Longworth H.O.B. 2468 Rayburn H.O.B. Washington, D.C. 20515 Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Majority Leader Schumer, Minority Leader McConnell, Speaker Pelosi, and House Minority Leader McCarthy: We are writing you today to urge you to reject the “For the People Act” otherwise known as H.R. 1 or S. 1, which is a dangerous overreach by the federal government into the administration of elections. Each state legislature should have the freedom and flexibility to determine practices that best meet the needs of their respective states. A one-size-fits-all approach mandated by Congress is not the solution to any of our problems. These bills intrude upon our constitutional rights, and further sacrifice the security and integrity of the elections process. We firmly believe the authority to legislate and regulate these changes should be left with the states. H.R. 1 and S. 1 blatantly undermine the extensive work we, as election officials, have completed in order to provide safe, accessible voting options for our constituencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Mail Voting Litigation During the Coronavirus Pandemic
    Mail Voting Litigation During the Coronavirus Pandemic October 29, 2020 Abstract: With approximately 8 0 million Americans projected to vote by mail in November, parties have turned to the courts to clarify the appropriate ways to adapt, apply, and administer the rules of mail voting for pandemic elections. P laintis across the country have led more than 200 cases and appeals challenging nearly every aspect of the absentee balloting process, asserting claims under a variety of state and federal laws. This report outlines the many legal challenges to absentee and mail voting systems brought since March, largely in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Authors: Connor Clerkin, Lane Corrigan, Zahavah Levine, Aviel Menter, Christopher Meyer, Alexander Perry, and Theodora Raymond-Sidel HealthyElections.org: Mail Voting Litigation During the Coronavirus Pandemic 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 Introduction 3 Part I: Application and Eligibility to Vote By Mail 7 Applying to Vote by Mail 8 Absentee Balloting Without an Excuse 9 Fear of Contracting COVID-19 as an Excuse 11 Age Limits 14 Ensuring Receipt of Mail-In Ballots 15 Part II: Submission of Mail-In Ballots 16 Ballot Receipt Deadlines 16 Ballot Secrecy Sleeve Requirements 24 Cost of Postage for Mailing Ballots 25 Failure to Provide Accommodations for Voters with Disabilities 27 Part II Conclusion 28 Part III: Challenges Seeking to Expand Delivery Options 30 Bans on Absentee Voter Assistance 31 Limits on Absentee Ballot Drop-O Locations 33 USPS Operational Changes 35 Part III Conclusion
    [Show full text]
  • Jena M. Griswold Colorado Secretary of State
    Jena M. Griswold Colorado Secretary of State July 28, 2020 Senator Mitch McConnell Senator Charles E. Schumer Senator Richard C. Shelby Senator Patrick J. Leahy Senator Roy Blunt Senator Amy Klobuchar Dear Senators: As Secretaries of State of both major political parties who oversee the election systems of our respective states, we write in strong support of additional federal funding to enable the smooth and safe administration of elections in 2020. The stakes are high. And time is short. The COVID-19 pandemic is testing our democracy. A number of states have faced challenges during recent primary elections. Local administrators were sometimes overwhelmed by logistical problems such as huge volumes of last-minute absentee ballot applications, unexpected shortages of poll workers, and difficulty of procuring and distributing supplies. As we anticipate significantly higher voter turnout in the November General Election, we believe those kinds of problems could be even larger. The challenge we face is to ensure that voters and our election workers can safely participate in the election process. While none of us knows what the world will look like on November 3rd, the most responsible posture is to hope for the best and plan for the worst. The plans in each of our states depend on adequate resources. While we are truly grateful for the resources that Congress made available in the CARES Act for election administration, more funding is critical. Current funding levels help to offset, but do not cover, the unexpectedly high costs that state and local governments face in trying to administer safe and secure elections this year.
    [Show full text]
  • March 7, 2019 Ms. Eva Guidarini U.S. Politics & Government Outreach
    NASS EXECUTIVE BOARD Hon. Jim Condos, VT President March 7, 2019 Hon. Paul Pate, IA Ms. Eva Guidarini President-elect U.S. Politics & Government Outreach, Facebook Hon. Maggie Toulouse Oliver, NM 575 7th Street NW Treasurer Washington, D.C. 20004 Hon. Steve Simon, MN Secretary Dear Ms. Guidarini: Hon. Connie Lawson, IN Immediate Past President On behalf of the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS), I would like to thank you for your willingness to work with the Secretaries Hon. Denise Merrill, CT Eastern Region Vice President of State, election directors and other important stakeholders to address misinformation and disinformation on your platforms related to the Hon. Tre Hargett, TN elections process. We believe significant progress has been made to Southern Region Vice President understand and address these issues. As we move into 2019 and the 2020 Hon. Jay Ashcroft, MO general election, we urge Facebook to further engage on the following Midwestern Region Vice President issues: Hon. Alex Padilla, CA Western Region Vice President First, the elections community faced many challenges as a result of Facebook’s use of a non-government, third-party site to prompt Hon. Al Jaeger, ND Member-at-Large (NPA) users to register to vote. We instead encourage Facebook to either connect directly to the chief state election webpages, state online voter Hon. Matt Dunlap, ME registration system webpages, and/or vote.gov. These government- Member -at-Large (ACR) backed websites will provide accurate information to the public, eliminating confusion and frustration in the voter registration process. As we have previously discussed, in the 2018 midterm election cycle, a non- government, third-party site failed to properly notify users of incomplete voter registration applications initiated through their site.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the District of Colorado
    Case 1:20-cv-03747-NRN Document 92 Filed 04/28/21 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 29 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 20-cv-03747-NRN KEVIN O’ROURKE, NATHANIEL L. CARTER, LORI CUTUNILLI, LARRY D. COOK, ALVIN CRISWELL, KESHA CRENSHAW, NEIL YARBROUGH, and AMIE TRAPP, Plaintiffs, v. DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS INC., a Delaware corporation, FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation, CENTER FOR TECH AND CIVIC LIFE, an Illinois non-profit organization, MARK E. ZUCKERBERG, individually, PRISCILLA CHAN, individually, BRIAN KEMP, individually, BRAD RAFFENSPERGER, individually, GRETCHEN WHITMER, individually, JOCELYN BENSON, individually, TOM WOLF, individually, KATHY BOOCKVAR, individually, TONY EVERS, individually, ANN S. JACOBS, individually, MARK L. THOMSEN, individually, MARGE BOSTELMAN, individually, JULIE M. GLANCEY, DEAN KNUDSON, individually, ROBERT F. SPINDELL, JR, individually, and DOES 1-10,000, Defendants. ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS (Dkt. ##22, 23, & 41) & PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO AMEND (Dkt. #48) N. REID NEUREITER United States Magistrate Judge 1 Case 1:20-cv-03747-NRN Document 92 Filed 04/28/21 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 29 This matter is before the Court with the consent of the Parties, referred for all purposes by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). This lawsuit arises out of the 2020 election for President of the United States. The original Complaint, filed December 22, 2020 (Dkt. #1) and which purports to be a class action lawsuit brought on behalf of 160 million registered voters, alleges a vast conspiracy between four state governors; secretaries of state; and various election officials of Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Georgia; along with Dominion Voting Systems, Inc.—a private supplier of election and voting technology; the social media company Facebook, Inc.; the Center for Tech and Civic Life (“CTCL”)—a non-profit organization dedicated to making elections more secure and inclusive; as well as Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan.
    [Show full text]
  • We Call Upon All Elected Leaders And
    “We call upon all elected leaders and elections officials at every level of government to recommit to our core democratic principles, to look within and consider what they themselves can do in this critical hour to uphold the best in our nation’s values.” – Faith leaders’ statement on integrity, safety and fairness in the 2020 U.S Election, Oct. 12, 2020 Send Faith Leaders' Letter on Elections to Secretary of State Please contact your secretary of state and urge her/him to ensure the integrity of the upcoming elections. The Lawyers and Collars voting rights education and protection program has prioritized this messaging for nine states: Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Wisconsin. You may find a sample message and contact information below. Background As Election Day 2020 approaches, the country is facing many challenges and with it growing stress on state and county election officials. Boards of Elections will have to process many more absentee ballots than in past elections because of the pandemic. Older persons who usually make up a significant percentage of poll workers may not be working this year because they are more susceptible to the virus, leading to thinner staffing. A contentious election may also lead to a record turnout. Add to those factors: calls for people to ”protect” election sites with a show of force and persistent disinformation about election “fraud” and a “rigged election.” The Sisters of Mercy signed onto a faith leaders’ statement on integrity, safety and fairness in the 2020 U.S Election that calls “for integrity in the processes that shape our systems of governance and form the basis of our shared wellbeing.” It is important to let your secretary of state know that you expect her/him to adhere to the highest standards to ensure that voters have correct information, that there is no intimidation of voters outside polling places and that all valid ballots are counted, no matter how long it takes.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution Reaffirming the NASS Position on Funding and Authorization of the U.S
    Resolution Reaffirming the NASS Position on Funding and Authorization of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission WHEREAS, the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS), on February 6, 2005, voted to approve a resolution by a substantial majority asking Congress not to reauthorize or fund the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) after the conclusion of the 2006 federal election, by which date all the states were required to fully implement the mandates of the Help America Vote Act; and WHEREAS, the 2005 resolution was passed to help prevent the EAC from eventually evolving into a regulatory body, contrary to the spirt of the Help America Vote Act; and WHEREAS, that action was meant to preserve the state’ ability to serve as laboratories of change through successful experiments and innovation in election reform; and WHEREAS, each resolution passed at a NASS conference sunsets after five years unless reauthorized by a vote of the members; and WHEREAS, the NASS position on funding and authorization of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission was renewed by the membership on July 20, 2010; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the National Association of Secretaries of State, expressing their continued consistent position in 2015, reaffirm their resolution of 2005 and 2010 and encourage Congress not to reauthorize or fund the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. Adopted the 12th day of July 2015 in Portland, ME EXPIRES: Summer 2020 Hall of States, 444 N. Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20001 (202) 624-3525 Phone (202) 624.3527 Fax www.nass.org On the motion to adopt the Resolution Reaffirming the NASS Position on Funding and Authorization of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • States Reconvene National Task Force on Business Identity Theft
    NEWS RELEASE Louisiana Tom Schedler Department of State Secretary of State Meg Casper P.O. Box 94125 Press Secretary Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9125 225.362.5086 www.sos.la.gov [email protected] March 10, 2016 STATES RECONVENE NATIONAL TASK FORCE ON BUSINESS IDENTITY THEFT BATON ROUGE, La.—Secretaries of State from more than a dozen states are joining together to re- establish the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) Task Force on Business Identity Theft, a bipartisan initiative aimed at combating the spread of business impersonation and other forms of ID- related fraud. North Carolina Secretary of State Elaine F. Marshall and Iowa Secretary of State Paul Pate have been tapped to co-chair the task force's work. The body is tasked with reviewing state business identity theft prevention and security practices, as well as new issues which have emerged since the original task force wrapped up its in work in 2012. "As attempts to hijack business identities have increased and grown more sophisticated in North Carolina and other states, this task force can play an important role in coordinating information-sharing and responses," noted Marshall. "Our goal is to improve protections for business and offer practical solutions for the state registration and filing agencies that serve them." "I am extremely pleased to co-chair this task force," said Pate. "Business ID theft is a very serious issue across the country and requires a joint effort to combat it. We will work hard to develop best practices and provide guidance for business in Iowa and around the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Senate Legislative Manual
    TENNESSEE SENATE 106TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY LEGISLATIVE MANUAL RON RAMSEY LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR AND SPEAKER OF THE SENATE Published by: The Office of the Chief Clerk Tennessee State Senate Russell Humphrey, Chief Clerk TABLE OF CONTENTS THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH 3 The Lieutenant Governor ............................................................................... 4 Members of the Senate ................................................................................... 5 General Schedule ...........................................................................................15 Senate District Map .......................................................................................16 Senate Seating Chart......................................................................................17 Officers of the Senate.....................................................................................18 Sergeants-At-Arms........................................................................................19 Members of the House of Representatives.....................................................20 House District Map .......................................................................................24 House Seating Chart......................................................................................26 Senate Standing & Select Committees ..........................................................27 House Standing & Select Committees ..........................................................28 Joint Committees ...........................................................................................30
    [Show full text]