DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 117/Tuesday, June 18, 2002

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 117/Tuesday, June 18, 2002 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2002 / Proposed Rules 41367 loads and neck moments than those into or the addition of, window frames on Approximately 1,786 hectares (ha) tempered glass. Impacts into standard the side of vehicles and result in smaller (4,412 acres (ac)) are proposed for tempered glass resulted in axial loads side windows. For vehicles with framed designation of critical habitat. We are that were comparable to those into the windows, NHTSA estimates it would proposing to include approximately 740 advanced glazings. For each neck injury cost between $48 and $79 to modify the ha (1,828 ac) within two units located measure, the lowest neck injury two front side windows. However, many in Marin and Sonoma counties, measurements were obtained from the vehicles today are produced without California, as critical habitat for tempered glass impacts. framed windows. NHTSA has no cost Delphinium bakeri, and 1,046 ha (2,584 On July 19, 2000 (65 FR 44710), estimates for modifying windows ac) within four units also located in NHTSA published a request for without frames to accept advanced Marin and Sonoma counties, California, comments on the agency’s second glazing. In addition, NHTSA has no cost as critical habitat for Delphinium advanced glazing status report (DOT estimates for modifying rear side luteum. Critical habitat receives docket NHTSA–2000–7066). NHTSA windows for advanced side glazing. protection from destruction or adverse received 96 comments from auto Advanced side glazing would require modification through required manufacturers, suppliers, safety groups, modifications to the design of all consultation under section 7 of the Act a vehicle extraction specialist, an vehicles currently being produced to with regard to actions carried out, engineering service, and private make their windows smaller, and the funded, or authorized by a Federal individuals. NHTSA has carefully costs of such a design modification agency. Section 4 of the Act requires us analyzed the information provided in would be significant. to consider economic and other relevant the comments. The automotive Given these concerns, NHTSA impacts when specifying any particular manufacturers commented that believes it would be more appropriate to area as critical habitat. advanced glazing may induce head, devote its research and rulemaking We solicit data and comments from neck and lacerative injuries and efforts with respect to ejection the public on all aspects of this recommended that NHTSA focus on mitigation to projects other than proposal, including data on the occupant containment efforts by means advanced glazing. Thus, the agency will economic and other impacts of the of side curtain air bags. All other not continue to examine a potential designation and our approaches to commenters believed that advanced requirement for advanced side glazing. handling any future habitat glazings would enhance the overall The focus will shift from advanced conservation plans. We may revise this safety performance of vehicles. The glazing to the development of more proposal prior to final designation to private citizens did not provide comprehensive, performance-based test incorporate or address new information technical data, but they favored the use procedures. If such procedures prove received during the comment period. of advanced glazing in side and rear feasible, NHTSA will focus its efforts on DATES: We will accept comments until windows of vehicles based on their establishing the safety performance that August 19, 2002. Public hearing belief that up to 1,300 lives may be must be achieved. For these reasons, requests must be received by August 2, saved each year. The manufacturers NHTSA has decided to terminate 2002. indicated that advanced glazing benefits rulemaking on the issue of advanced ADDRESSES: If you wish to comment, assume a 66% belt use rate and the glazing. benefits would dramatically decline you may submit your comments and with increased seat belt use. Issued on: June 13, 2002. materials concerning this proposal by Stephen R. Kratzke, any one of several methods: II. Agency Decision Associate Administrator for Safety You may submit written comments In the House of Representatives Performance Standards. and information or hand-deliver Conference Report on H.R. 4475, [FR Doc. 02–15356 Filed 6–17–02; 8:45 am] comments to the Field Supervisor, Department of Transportation and BILLING CODE 4910–59–P Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, Related Agencies Appropriation Act, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2800 2001, Congress noted that NHTSA had Cottage Way, Suite W—2605, been considering the utility of advanced DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Sacramento, CA 95825. side glazing since 1991, and directed You may also send comments by NHTSA to complete and issue a final Fish and Wildlife Service electronic mail (e-mail) to report on advanced side glazing. In [email protected]. November 2001, NHTSA completed that 50 CFR Part 17 See the Public Comments Solicited directive and published a final report, section below for file format and other ‘‘Ejection Mitigation Using Advanced RIN 1018–AG96 information about electronic filing. Comments and materials received will Glazing.’’ Based on its rulemaking Endangered and Threatened Wildlife be available for public inspection, by efforts and research documented in the and Plants; Critical Habitat appointment, during normal business report, NHTSA concludes that there is Designation for Two Larkspurs From hours at the above address. no reasonable possibility of proposing Coastal Northern California regulatory requirements for advanced FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: glazing in the foreseeable future due to AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Wayne White, Field Supervisor, safety and cost concerns. Interior. Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, at Two primary reasons for this ACTION: Proposed rule. the above address: telephone 916/414– conclusion are the advent of other 6600; facsimile 916/414–6710. ejection mitigation systems, such as side SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: air curtains and the need to develop Wildlife Service (Service), propose to performance standards for them, and the designate critical habitat pursuant to the Background fact that advanced side glazing in some Endangered Species Act of 1973, as Delphinium bakeri is a perennial herb cases appears to increase the risk of amended (Act), for Delphinium bakeri in the buttercup family (Ranunculaceae) neck injury. In addition, advanced side (Baker’s larkspur) and Delphinium that grows from a thickened, tuber-like, glazing would require modifications to, luteum (yellow larkspur). fleshy cluster of roots. The stems are VerDate jun<06>2002 19:01 Jun 17, 2002 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM pfrm15 PsN: 18JNP1 41368 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2002 / Proposed Rules hollow, erect, and grow to 65 near Tomales that is thought to be fruit is a follicle. D. luteum flowers from centimeters (cm) (26 inches ( in)) tall. extirpated (CNDDB 2001). March to May. Delphinium luteum is Shallowly five-parted leaves occur The single extant (currently existing, distinguished from other Delphinium by primarily along the upper third of the not extirpated or destroyed) occurrence its yellow flowers and its erect seed stem and are green (as opposed to of Delphinium bakeri grows in mesic follicles (CNPS 1977). In contrast to withering) at the time the plant flowers. (moderate moisture) conditions along an typical pollinators for the genus The flowers are irregularly shaped. The extensive north-facing slope under an Delphinium, potential pollinators for D. five sepals (members of the outermost overstory that includes Umbellularia luteum are Allen’s hummingbirds, set of flower parts) are conspicuous, californica (California bay), Aesculus which have been observed visiting D. bright dark blue or purplish, with the californica (California buckeye), and luteum flowers. In addition, the flower rear sepal elongated into a spur (hollow, Quercus agrifolia (coastal live oak). shape and sucrose-dominated nectar are often cone-shaped, projection). The Other native plants associated with D. consistent with characteristics of inconspicuous petals occur in two pairs. bakeri at this site include—Baccharis species that are typically pollinated by The lower pair is oblong and blue- pilularis ssp. consanguinea hummingbirds (Guerrant 1976). purple; the upper pair is oblique (having (coyotebrush), Symphorcarpos cf. Heller (1903) described Delphinium unequal sides or an asymmetric base) rivularis (snowberry), Rubus ursinus luteum based on type material collected and white. Seeds are produced in (California blackberry), Pteridium from ‘‘grassy slopes about rocks, near several dry, many-seeded fruits which aquilinum (braken fern), Polystichum Bodega Bay, along the road leading to split open at maturity on only one side munitum (Sword fern), Pityrogramma the village of Bodega’’ in Sonoma (i.e., follicles). Delphinium bakeri triangularis (goldback fern), Dryopteris County. Although Jepson (1975) flowers from April through May arguta (coastal woodfern), Adiantum reduced D. luteum to a variety of D. (Warnock 1993). Delphinium bakeri can jordanii (maidenhair fern), and nudicaule (red larkspur), it is currently be differentiated from other members of Polypodium glycyrrhiza (licorice fern) recognized as a full species (Warnock the genus by its crenate leaf margins (CNDDB 2001).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Curriculum Vitae
    Jason Ager Koontz Biology Department, Augustana College Phone: 309-794-3442 639-38th Street FAX: 309-794-8004 Rock Island, IL 61201 E-mail: [email protected] Education 1993 B.S. (Botany) Iowa State University, Ames, IA (with Distinction, Honors Program, and Phi Beta Kappa) 1995 M.S. (Botany) Miami University, Oxford, OH 2000 Ph.D. (Botany) Washington State University, Pullman, WA Current Position 7/14-present: Chair of Biology 8/11-7/14: Co-Chair of Biology 8/10: Tenured and promoted to Associate Professor 9/04-8/10: Assistant Professor of Biology Becoming Biologists (BI150), General Botany (BI220), Cell Biology (BI210), Nutrition (BI263; 2004-2006), Natural History of Ireland (BI328; 2010, 2013), Conservation Biology (BI410), Conservation Biology Senior Inquiry (BI464) Non-Academic Positions 5/12-present: Research Associate, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, CA. 1/06-present: Research Associate, Department of Botany, The Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL. 10/04-present: Adjunct Assistant Professional Scientist, Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL. 5/00-9/04: Assistant Research Scientist III, Plant Systematist, Centers for Biodiversity and Wildlife and Plant Ecology, Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, IL. Academic Positions 10/01-12/07: Affiliate Assistant Professor, Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL. 8/95-5/00: Graduate Teaching Assistant, Department of Botany, Washington State University,
    [Show full text]
  • Gymnaconitum, a New Genus of Ranunculaceae Endemic to the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau
    TAXON 62 (4) • August 2013: 713–722 Wang & al. • Gymnaconitum, a new genus of Ranunculaceae Gymnaconitum, a new genus of Ranunculaceae endemic to the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Wei Wang,1 Yang Liu,2 Sheng-Xiang Yu,1 Tian-Gang Gao1 & Zhi-Duan Chen1 1 State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, P.R. China 2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-3043, U.S.A. Author for correspondence: Wei Wang, [email protected] Abstract The monophyly of traditional Aconitum remains unresolved, owing to the controversial systematic position and taxonomic treatment of the monotypic, Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau endemic A. subg. Gymnaconitum. In this study, we analyzed two datasets using maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference methods: (1) two markers (ITS, trnL-F) of 285 Delphinieae species, and (2) six markers (ITS, trnL-F, trnH-psbA, trnK-matK, trnS-trnG, rbcL) of 32 Delphinieae species. All our analyses show that traditional Aconitum is not monophyletic and that subgenus Gymnaconitum and a broadly defined Delphinium form a clade. The SOWH tests also reject the inclusion of subgenus Gymnaconitum in traditional Aconitum. Subgenus Gymnaconitum markedly differs from other species of Aconitum and other genera of tribe Delphinieae in many non-molecular characters. By integrating lines of evidence from molecular phylogeny, divergence times, morphology, and karyology, we raise the mono- typic A. subg. Gymnaconitum to generic status. Keywords Aconitum; Delphinieae; Gymnaconitum; monophyly; phylogeny; Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau; Ranunculaceae; SOWH test Supplementary Material The Electronic Supplement (Figs. S1–S8; Appendices S1, S2) and the alignment files are available in the Supplementary Data section of the online version of this article (http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/iapt/tax).
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 17/Wednesday, January 26, 2000
    4156 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 17 / Wednesday, January 26, 2000 / Rules and Regulations Dated: January 18, 2000. extirpated numerous populations of reduced D. luteum to a variety of D. Stephen C. Saunders, these two plants in coastal Marin and nudicaule, it is currently recognized as Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Sonoma Counties in northern California. a full species (Warnock 1993). Wildlife and Parks. The historical range of Delphinium Delphinium luteum occurs on rocky [FR Doc. 00± 1746 Filed 1±25±00; 8:45 am] bakeri and D. luteum did not extend areas within coastal scrub plant BILLING CODE 4310±55±P beyond coastal Marin and Sonoma community, including areas with active Counties. rock slides, from sea level to 100 m (300 Ewan (1942) described Delphinium ft) in elevation (Guerrant 1976). DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR bakeri based on type material collected Delphinium luteum is a perennial by Milo Baker in 1939 from Coleman herb in the buttercup family Fish and Wildlife Service Valley, Sonoma County, California. In (Ranunculaceae) that grows from fibrous the most recent treatment, Warnock roots to 56 cm (22 in) tall. The leaves 50 CFR Part 17 (1993) retained the taxon as a full are mostly basal, fleshy, and green at the species. Historically, D. bakeri was time of flowering. The flowers are RIN 1018±AE23 known from Coleman Valley in Sonoma cornucopia-shaped. The five Endangered and Threatened Wildlife County and from a site near Tomales in conspicuous sepals are bright yellow, and Plants; Determination of Marin County. Delphinium bakeri with the posterior sepal elongated into Endangered Status for Two Larkspurs occurs on decomposed shale within the a spur.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources Study Tolay Creek Ranch Sonoma County, California
    BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES STUDY TOLAY CREEK RANCH SONOMA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted to: Sonoma Land Trust 2300 County Center Drive #120A Santa Rosa, California 95403 Prepared by: LSA Associates, Inc. 157 Park Place Point Richmond, California 94801 (510) 236-6810 LSA Project No. SOZ0801 May 2o, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1 1.1 PURPOSE.............................................................................................................................1 1.2 LOCATION ..........................................................................................................................1 1.3 BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................1 1.4 LAND USE AND HISTORY...............................................................................................2 1.5 REGULATORY CONTEXT................................................................................................3 1.5.1 Federal Endangered Species Act .............................................................................3 1.5.2 Clean Water Act ......................................................................................................4 1.5.3 Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act.............................................................5 1.5.4 Migratory Bird Treaty Act.......................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Rittersporne
    Rittersporne Die Rittersporne (Delphinium) sind eine Pflanzengattung aus der Familie der Hahnenfußgewächse (Ranunculaceae). Rittersporne Die 300 bis 350 Arten sind in der Holarktis weitverbreitet. 2015 wurden die Rittersporne Giftpflanze des Jahres. Inhaltsverzeichnis Beschreibung Inhaltsstoffe Zierpflanze Systematik und Verbreitung Postwertzeichen Quellen Einzelnachweise Weblinks Beschreibung Rittersporn-Arten wachsen selten als ein- bis zweijährige, meist als ausdauernde krautige Pflanzen. Die Laubblätter Sorten des Hohen Rittersporns sind dreiteilig, handförmig gelappt bis stark zerteilt. (Delphinium elatum-Hybriden) In traubigen oder schirmtraubigen Blütenständen stehen Systematik viele Blüten zusammen mit Hochblättern; selten stehen die Eudikotyledonen Blüten einzeln. Die zwittrigen Blüten sind zygomorph, Ordnung: Hahnenfußartige gespornt und kelchartig geformt. Von den fünf äußeren (Ranunculales) Blütenhüllblättern ist eines gespornt und umschließt die beiden inneren, gespornten Blütenhüllblätter. Es sind zwei Familie: Hahnenfußgewächse Blütenhüllblattkreise vorhanden. Von den vier inneren, (Ranunculaceae) freien Blütenhüllblättern sind die beiden oberen gespornt Unterfamilie: Ranunculoideae und enthalten Nektar; die beiden unteren sind ungespornt. Tribus: Delphinieae Es sind viele Staubblätter vorhanden. Es sind meist drei Gattung: Rittersporne (seltener vier bis zehn) freie Fruchtblätter vorhanden mit Wissenschaftlicher Name vielen Samenanlagen. Der Griffel besitzt eine deutlich erkennbare Narbe. Delphinium L. Es werden schmale
    [Show full text]
  • List of the Federal and State-Listed Rare, Endangered, & Threatened
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 1-21-2020 List of the Federal and State-listed Rare, Endangered, & Threatened Plants of California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "List of the Federal and State-listed Rare, Endangered, & Threatened Plants of California" (2020). Botanical Studies. 92. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/92 This Flora of California is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CALIFORNIA'S FEDERAL AND STATE-LISTED RARE, ENDANGERED, & THREATENED PLANTS Compiled by James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 21 January 2020 used the names used by the California Natural DEFINITIONS AND NAMES Diversity Database. Federally-listed Plants CONIFERS Under the provisions of the Endangered Species Act, a plant is endangered if it is “in danger of extinction Cupressaceae throughout all or a significant portion of its range.” Hesperocyparis abramsiana var. abramsiana • FT - SE A species is threatened if it is “likely to become an Hesperocyparis abramsiana var. butanoensis • FT - SE endangered species within the foreseeable future Hesperocyparis goveniana • FT throughout all or a significant portion of its range.” FLOWERING PLANTS FE Federally-listed as endangered FT Federally-listed as threatened Amaranthaceae State-listed Plants Atriplex coronata var.
    [Show full text]
  • Fountaingrove Lodge Appendix H Species Tables
    Appendix H Species Tables APPENDIX H Species Tables TABLE H-1 Special-Status Plant Species Potentially Occurring within the Fountaingrove Lodge Study Area USFWS/ CDFG/ Scientific Name Common Name CNPS Suitable Habitat for the Species Flowering Period Potential to Occur Allium peninsulare var. Franciscan onion None/None/1B.2 Cismontane woodland, valley and foothill grassland/clay, volcanic, often May-June Very low. Nearest known locality near Kenwood, about 10 miles SE of project area (CalFlora franciscanum serpentinite. 100-300m 2007, Jepson On-line Interchange 2007). Amorpha californica var. Napa false indigo None/None/1B.2 Broadleaved upland forest, chaparral, cismontane woodland; often shaded April – July Moderate. Nearest known localities < 5 miles NE of project area at Pepperwood Preserve napensis slopes. 150-200m. (CNDDB 2007, DeNevers 2003). Amsinckia lunaris bent-flowered None/None/1B.2 Coastal bluff scrub, cismontane woodland, valley and foothill grassland. March-June Low. A wide-ranging species. Nearest known locality near Kenwood, about 10 miles SE of project fiddleneck 3-500m. area (CalFlora 2007, Jepson On-line Interchange 2007). Anomobryum julaceuma slender silver-moss None/None/List 2.2 Broadleaved upland forest, lower montane coniferous forest, north coast March-June Very Low. Nearest known locality < 5 miles E of the project area, near the intersection of coniferous forest. 100-1000m. Calistoga and St. Helena roads (Norris and Shevock 2004). Astragalus claranus Clara Hunt's FE/ None/1B.1 Cismontane woodland, valley foothill grassland, chaparral; sometimes on March-May Very Low. Nearest known locality is about 6 miles NE of the project area, near Alpine School on milk-vetch serpentine.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving North America's Threatened Plants
    Conserving North America’s Threatened Plants Progress report on Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Conserving North America’s Threatened Plants Progress report on Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation By Andrea Kramer, Abby Hird, Kirsty Shaw, Michael Dosmann, and Ray Mims January 2011 Recommended ciTaTion: Kramer, A., A. Hird, K. Shaw, M. Dosmann, and R. Mims. 2011. Conserving North America’s Threatened Plants: Progress report on Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation . BoTanic Gardens ConservaTion InTernaTional U.S. Published by BoTanic Gardens ConservaTion InTernaTional U.S. 1000 Lake Cook Road Glencoe, IL 60022 USA www.bgci.org/usa Design: John Morgan, [email protected] Contents Acknowledgements . .3 Foreword . .4 Executive Summary . .5 Chapter 1. The North American Flora . .6 1.1 North America’s plant diversity . .7 1.2 Threats to North America’s plant diversity . .7 1.3 Conservation status and protection of North America’s plants . .8 1.3.1 Regional conservaTion sTaTus and naTional proTecTion . .9 1.3.2 Global conservaTion sTaTus and proTecTion . .10 1.4 Integrated plant conservation . .11 1.4.1 In situ conservaTion . .11 1.4.2 Ex situ collecTions and conservaTion applicaTions . .12 1.4.3 ParameTers of ex situ collecTions for conservaTion . .16 1.5 Global perspective and work on ex situ conservation . .18 1.5.1 Global STraTegy for PlanT ConservaTion, TargeT 8 . .18 Chapter 2. North American Collections Assessment . .19 2.1 Background . .19 2.2 Methodology . .19 2.2.1 Compiling lisTs of ThreaTened NorTh American Taxa .
    [Show full text]
  • Draft January 2018
    DRAFT BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT COPELAND CREEK DETENTION BASIN AND TRAIL PROJECT SONOMA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: City of Rohnert Park 130 Avram Avenue Rohnert Park, California 94928 Contact: Mary Grace Pawson Prepared by: 853 Lincoln Way Auburn, California 95603 Contact: Lisa Achter JANUARY 2018 January 9, 2018 9810 Mary Grace Pawson Director of Development Services City of Rohnert Park 130 Avram Avenue Rohnert Park, California 94928 Subject: Biological Resources Assessment for the Copeland Creek Detention Basin and Trail Project, Sonoma County, California Dear Ms. Pawson: In November of 2017, Dudek biologist Lisa Achter conducted a reconnaissance level general biological field survey at the Copeland Creek Detention Basin and Trail project site in Sonoma County, California (Figure 1). The focus of the survey was to characterize existing site conditions, document biological resources, and to summarize potential biological constraints associated with the proposed development and associated improvements to the site. A description of the methods and results of the biological survey and related recommendations is provided below. 1 SITE LOCATION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The 128-acre project site is located just east of the City of Rohnert Park, at 6626 Petaluma Hill Road (Figure 2). The project site is characterized by relatively flat terrain in the western portion of the site where the proposed detention basin will be located, and rolling hills in the eastern portion of the site where the trail will be located (Figure 2). Copeland Creek flows from east to west along the southern boundary and through the southwestern corner of the site. Elevation within the project site varies from approximately 175 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) in the southwestern flatlands to 400 feet AMSL in the hills of the eastern portion of the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 118 / Thursday, June 19
    Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 118 / Thursday, June 19, 1997 / Proposed Rules 33383 the entire soil cover is now completely DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Sonoma Counties in northern California. vegetated, and there are no barren areas The historical range of Delphinium remaining onsite. The Site is now Fish and Wildlife Service bakeri and D. luteum did not extend completely fenced and has a locked beyond coastal Marin and Sonoma entrance gate. A Consent Decree with 50 CFR Part 17 counties. the property owner to record the deed RIN 1018±AE23 Ewan (1942) described Delphinium restrictions has been signed, and the bakeri based on type material collected deed restrictions are attached to the Endangered and Threatened Wildlife by Milo Baker in 1939 from ``Coleman property deed in the Butler County and Plants; Proposed Endangered Valley, Sonoma Co., California.'' In the Courthouse in Butler, Pennsylvania. Status for Two Larkspurs From most recent treatment, Warnock (1993) Coastal Northern California retained the taxon as a full species. Chester Engineers (Chester) was hired Historically, D. bakeri was known from by PPG in 1994 to perform the site AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Coleman Valley in Sonoma County and maintenance and the long-term ground Interior. from a site near Tomales in Marin water monitoring at the Site. This semi- ACTION: Proposed rule. County. Delphinium bakeri occurs on annual sampling has been an important decomposed shale within the coastal part of the operation and maintenance at SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service scrub plant community from 400 to 500 the Site. Chester samples a number of (Service) proposes endangered status feet (ft) (120 to 150 meters (m) in locations, both on-and offsite, in the pursuant to the Endangered Species Act elevation (California Natural Diversity Spring and Fall of each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Marin Municipal Water District Rare Plant Inventory Update
    MARIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT RARE PLANT INVENTORY UPDATE MAY 1, 2019 ADDENDUM JULY 8, 2019 ANDREA WILLIAMS, VEGETATION ECOLOGIST MARIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT [email protected] MICHELLE O’HERRON, COMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANT O’HERRON & COMPANY [email protected] RECOMMENDED CITATION: Williams, A., & O'Herron, M. (2019). Marin Municipal Water District Rare Plant Inventory Update. Corte Madera, CA: Marin Municipal Water District. COVER PHOTO: The rare Sargent cypress-Mt. Tamalpais manzanita plant community, is also dominated by the rare endemic Mt. Tamalpais manzanita. Andrea Williams/MMWD Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 6 Marin Municipal Water District Resources Overview ............................................................ 6 Biodiversity and Resource Values ....................................................................................... 7 Ecological Threats and Stressors ......................................................................................... 8 Marin Municipal Water District Rare Plants ......................................................................... 10 Methods .................................................................................................................................... 13 Making the List ...................................................................................................................... 13 Field Surveys ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 9-1 Novato Is Home to a Rich Diversity of Wildlife Habitat and Plant And
    9 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Novato is home to a rich diversity of wildlife habitat and plant and animal species. These biological resources represent an important environmental asset for the entire Bay Area and contribute to a unique sense of place in Novato. This chapter provides a description of the regulatory framework related to these resources and identifies and describes the biological resources in and around Novato. A. Regulatory Framework 1. Federal Regulations a. Federal Endangered Species Act The federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) is a complex law enacted in 1973 to protect and recover plant and animal species in danger of becoming extinct and to conserve their ecosystems, with the ultimate goal being the recovery of a species to the point where it is no longer in need of protection. An “endangered” plant or animal species is one that is considered in danger of becoming extinct throughout all or a significant portion of its range. A “threatened” species is one that is likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future. The ESA prohibits the “take” of protected spe- cies. “Take,” as defined by the federal ESA, means to “harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, kill, trap, capture, or collect” a threatened or endangered species. “Harm” is further defined by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to include the killing or harming of wildlife due to significant obstruction of essential behavior patterns (i.e. breeding, feeding, or sheltering) through significant habitat modifications or degradation. The USFWS and the National Marine Fisheries Service of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NO- AA Fisheries) have jurisdiction over species that are formally listed as threatened or endangered under the federal ESA.
    [Show full text]