December 17, 2014 the Honourable Kathleen Wynne Premier of Ontario Legislative Building Queen's Park Toronto on M7A 1A1 the Ho

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

December 17, 2014 the Honourable Kathleen Wynne Premier of Ontario Legislative Building Queen's Park Toronto on M7A 1A1 the Ho December 17, 2014 17 décembre 2014 The Honourable Kathleen Wynne L’honorable Kathleen Wynne Premier of Ontario Première ministre de l’Ontario Legislative Building Édifice législatif Queen's Park Queen’s Park Toronto ON M7A 1A1 Toronto ON M7A 1A1 The Honourable Madeleine Meilleur L’honorable Madeleine Meilleur Attorney General of Ontario Procureure générale de l’Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General Ministère du procureur général McMurtry-Scott Building Édifice McMurtry-Scott 720 Bay Street, 11th Floor 720 rue Bay, 11ième étage Toronto, ON M7A 2S9 Toronto, ON M7A 2S9 Dear Premier and Attorney General: Chères Première ministre et Procureure générale, Re: The Protection of Communities and Exploited Re: Loi sur la protection des collectivités et des Persons Act personnes victimes d'exploitation We write to you as concerned citizens and Nous vous écrivons en tant que citoyens et members of the legal profession. membres de la communauté juridique. We are concerned about the direction the federal Nous sommes préoccupés par l’orientation prise government has taken with respect to adult par le gouvernement fédéral en ce qui a trait à la prostitution in Canada. The Protection of prostitution adulte au Canada. La Loi sur la Communities and Exploited Persons Act, which protection des collectivités et des personnes came into force on December 6, 2014, establishes victimes d'exploitation, entrée en vigueur le 6 a new legal regime that criminalizes many aspects décembre 2014, crée un nouveau régime juridique of adult prostitution, including the purchase of criminalisant plusieurs aspects de la prostitution sexual services, the advertisement of sexual adulte, y compris l’achat de services sexuels, la services, and communication for the purpose of publicité de services sexuels, et la communication prostitution. pour des fins de prostitution. As you know, the Supreme Court of Canada held Comme vous le savez, la Cour suprême du Canada unanimously in Canada (Attorney General) v. a unanimement statué, dans Canada (Procureur Bedford (“Bedford”), 2013 SCC 72 that three Général du Canada) c. Bedford ("Bedford"), 2013 former provisions of Canada’s laws on adult CSC 72, que trois des articles alors en vigueur en prostitution represented an unjustifiable matière de prostitution adulte au Canada infringement of sex workers’ right to security of constituaient une atteinte injustifiable au droit des 2 the person, contrary to section 7 of the Canadian travailleuse(-eur)s du sexe à la sécurité de leur Charter of Rights and Freedoms. These laws were personne, contrairement à l’article 7 de la Charte found to create and exacerbate dangerous canadienne des droits et libertés. La Cour a conclu conditions and impede sex workers from taking que ces articles créaient et exacerbaient de action to reduce the risks they face – sometimes dangereuses conditions, et empêchaient les with deadly consequences. We are concerned travailleuse(-eur)s du sexe de prendre les moyens that, for the very same reasons that led the Court nécessaires pour réduire les risques auxquels elles to strike down these earlier prostitution laws, the font face – parfois avec des conséquences new criminal regime is likely to violate the Charter mortelles. Nous craignons que, pour les mêmes as well. raisons qui ont mené la Cour à invalider les anciens articles, le nouveau régime criminel ne viole aussi The new prohibition on purchasing sexual la Charte. services (and a new, sweeping prohibition on a client communicating anywhere for that purpose) La nouvelle interdiction d’achat de services will have much the same effect as the former sexuels (et la nouvelle interdiction pour un client prostitution laws. Targeting clients will displace sex de communiquer n'importe où à ce sujet) aura les workers to isolated areas where prospective mêmes effets que l’ancienne loi. En ciblant les customers are less likely to be detected by police. clients, l’on déplacera les travailleuse(-eur)s du Such criminalization will continue to limit the sexe vers des endroits isolés où les clients practical ability of sex workers to screen their potentiels sont moins susceptibles d’être repérés clients or negotiate the terms of the transaction, par la police. Une telle criminalisation continuera as there will be pressure from clients to proceed as de limiter la capacité des travailleuse(-eur)s du quickly as possible. Sex workers will continue to sexe de filtrer leurs clients ou de négocier les face barriers to police protection. Furthermore, termes de la transaction, puisque les clients feront sex workers will continue to be prevented from pression afin de procéder le plus rapidement operating in most safe indoor spaces, as clients possible. Les travailleuse(-eur)s du sexe face the potential of being arrested if they attend continueront de rencontrer des barrières les such spaces. empêchant d’avoir accès à la protection de la police. De surcroît, les travailleuse(-eur)s du sexe As a result, while criminalizing the purchase of continueront d’être empêchées de travailler dans sexual services, rather than the sale, is said to be la plupart des endroits intérieurs sécuritaires aimed at protecting sex workers, this type of puisque les clients seront susceptibles d’être criminal prohibition will in fact do what the former arrêtés s’ils s’y rendent. prostitution laws did, which is to subject sex workers to greater risks to their safety. This En conséquence, bien que la criminalisation de constitutes the reason why the former laws were l'achat de services sexuels (plutôt que de leur invalidated in the Bedford judgment. vente) vise soi-disant la protection des travailleuse(-eur)s du sexe, ce type d’interdiction The new law also prohibits advertising of sexual criminelle reproduira les effets des anciennes lois, services. While an individual sex worker does not soit de mettre à risque la sécurité des travailleuse(- 3 face prosecution for advertising their own eur)s du sexe - raison pour laquelle les anciennes services, the provision can be interpreted as lois ont été invalidées dans l’arrêt Bedford. prohibiting any other party (e.g. newspaper, website, phone service, etc.) from carrying any La nouvelle loi interdit aussi la publicité de prostitution-related advertising. The practical services sexuels. Alors qu’une travailleuse(-eur) du effect is to make it more difficult for a sex worker sexe ne sera pas à risque de poursuite pour avoir to advertise. This type of prohibition will fait la publicité de ses propres services sexuels, la significantly limit sex workers’ ability to work disposition peut être interprétée comme safely indoors, as it restricts their ability to interdisant à toute autre partie (p ex., quotidiens, communicate their services to potential clients – sites Web, services téléphoniques) de véhiculer leaving only advertising their services through toute publicité liée à la prostitution. En pratique, il their physical presence outdoors as the sera donc plus difficile pour les travailleuse(-eur)s alternative. Yet in Bedford, the Court clearly found du sexe de faire de la publicité. Ceci limite de façon that the ability to operate in indoor venues is one importante la possibilité pour les travailleuse(- key way for sex workers to reduce the risk of eur)s du sexe de travailler en toute sécurité à violence. l'intérieur puisque leur capacité à communiquer leurs services aux clients potentiels est réduite, ne We would also like to address the prohibition on laissant que l’option de se rendre physiquement any communication, in a public place that is next visible à l’extérieur. Or, dans Bedford, la Cour a to a school ground, playground or day care clairement statué que travailler à l'intérieur, plutôt center, for the purposes of offering sexual qu’à l’extérieur, est une façon clé pour les services. This provision continues to criminalize travailleuse(-eur)s du sexe de réduire les risques street-based sex workers, who are among the de violence à leur égard. most marginalized segment of the industry. This provision, and the fact noted above that sex Nous voulons aussi aborder l'interdiction de toute workers’ clients are guilty of a crime for any communication dans un endroit public se communication to obtain their services, will have trouvant près d’un terrain d’école, d’un terrain de the same effect as the previous laws: sex workers jeux ou d’une garderie, dans le but d’offrir des will be less able to take the time to screen clients services sexuels. Cet article continue de and negotiate the terms of the transaction before criminaliser les travailleuse(-eur)s du sexe qui getting into a client’s car, and will be displaced to travaillent dans la rue, soit celles qui sont parmi les more isolated areas where they are at greater risk plus marginalisées de l'industrie. Cet article, et le of violence and less able to seek help if necessary. fait (expliqué ci-haut) que les clients sont coupables d’un crime pour toute communication We welcome your stated desire to “ensure that liée à l’obtention de services sexuels, auront les our laws and institutions enhance the safety of mêmes effets que les anciennes lois : les those who are vulnerable – in this case, sex travailleuse(-eur)s du sexe ne pourront prendre le workers: a class of (mostly) women who are temps de filtrer les clients et de négocier les disproportionately the victims of sexual and termes de la transaction avant d’entrer dans une physical violence.” In keeping with this voiture, et elles seront déplacées vers des zones 4 commitment, as you analyse the new regime, we plus isolées où elles sont plus à risque de violence urge you to keep in mind the harms that the et moins aptes à obtenir de l’aide si nécessaire. Supreme Court in Bedford said were caused by the then existing criminal prohibitions, as well as how Nous applaudissons l’intention que vous avez similar the new prohibitions are to the former exprimée d’ « assurer que nos lois et institutions ones and can therefore reasonably be expected to contribuent à la sécurité des personnes operate in the same way to produce the same vulnérables – en l’instance, les travailleuse(eur)s harms.
Recommended publications
  • Policing and Surveilling the Black Community in Toronto, Canada, 1992-2016
    From the Yonge Street Riot to the Carding Controversy: Policing and Surveilling the Black Community in Toronto, Canada, 1992-2016 By Maria Kyres A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Program in Cultural Studies in Conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada September, 2017 Copyright © Maria Kyres Abstract In the last decade, the conversation surrounding racial profiling and carding in the city of Toronto garnered much public and scholarly attention. Many journalists, academics and activists have examined the Community Contacts Policy, also known as carding, as well as mass incarceration and the police shootings and killings of unarmed, young Black men. The Yonge Street Uprising and the carding controversy in Toronto serve as two case studies to explore the ways that Black men have been disproportionately profiled, policed and surveilled in this country, particularly in the province of Ontario. Despite the fact that the Yonge Street Uprising and the carding controversy occurred decades apart, a common thread throughout both cases was the narrative of Black male criminality. In addition, it became apparent that many of the practices employed in contemporary society, such as racial profiling, carding and mass incarceration were derived from slavery, with the goal of limiting the freedom and mobility of Black people. Therefore, an examination of Canada’s historical treatment of Black people is necessary in order to demonstrate how practices rooted in slavery, such as, fugitive slave advertisements and historical representations of Black criminality helped inform current police practices. Through an analysis of historical, legal, criminological, and critical race scholarship, this work seeks to examine how and why Black people, specifically Black men, were and continue to be disproportionately more likely to be policed, surveilled and incarcerated.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2013
    A N N U A L R E P O R T of the JUSTICES OF THE PEACE APPOINTMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE for the Period from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2013 Toronto, Ontario September 2014 A N N U A L R E P O R T of the JUSTICES OF THE PEACE APPOINTMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE for the Period from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2013 Toronto, Ontario September 2014 ISSN 1918-4166 (Bilingual print) ISSN 1918-4174 (English Internet) ISSN 1918-4182 (French Internet) Persons wishing to comment on the process of the Justices of the Peace Appointments Advisory Committee are invited to write to: The Chair Justices of the Peace Appointments Advisory Committee 720 Bay Street 3rd Floor Toronto, Ontario M7A 2S9 PREVIOUS PUBLICATIONS OF THE JUSTICES OF THE PEACE APPOINTMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Annual Report for the Period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2007 (January 2009). Annual Report for the Period from 1 January 2008 to 31 August 2009 (January 2011). Annual Report for the Period from 1 September 2009 to 31 August 2010 (August 2011). Annual Report for the Period from 1 September 2010 to 31 December 2011 (January 2013). Annual Report for the Period from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2012 (January 2014). TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ................................................................................ 1 CHAIR’S SUMMARY ............................................................................................ 3 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 5 THE COMMITTEE’S
    [Show full text]
  • Family Legal Services Review
    Ministry of the Attorney General Family Legal Services Review Report submitted to: Attorney General Yasir Naqvi and Treasurer Paul Schabas By: Justice Annemarie E. Bonkalo Date: December 31, 2016 December 31, 2016 The Honourable Yasir Naqvi Attorney General of Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General McMurtry-Scott Building 720 Bay Street, 11th Floor Toronto, ON M7A 2S9 Treasurer Paul Schabas The Law Society of Upper Canada Osgoode Hall 130 Queen Street West Toronto, ON M5H 2N6 Dear Attorney General Naqvi and Treasurer Schabas, Re: Family Legal Services Review On February 9, 2016, I was appointed by then Attorney General Madeleine Meilleur and then Treasurer of the Law Society of Upper Canada Janet Minor to lead a review of the provision of family legal services by persons other than lawyers. I have the honour to present to you my report in this matter. Yours sincerely, Justice Annemarie E. Bonkalo Disclaimer As set out in the Terms of Reference establishing the Family Legal Services Review, the Attorney General and the Treasurer of the Law Society of Upper Canada agreed to work together on a review of the provision of family legal services by persons in addition to lawyers. Chief Justice Lise Maisonneuve of the Ontario Court of Justice agreed to assign me to undertake this review. Acknowledgments I would like to express my sincere appreciation to the following members of my advisory body for taking the time to meet with me and for their thoughtful consideration of the issues: • Lisa Bernstein • Nikki Gershbain • Judith Huddart • Hilary Linton • Alf Mamo • The Honourable Mary Jo Nolan • Elaine Page and • Noel Semple.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaying Justice Is Denying Justice: an Urgent Need to Address Lengthy Court Delays in Canada (Final Report), June 2017
    DELAYING JUSTICE IS DENYING JUSTICE An Urgent Need to Address Lengthy Court Delays in Canada Final report of the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs The Honourable Bob Runciman, Chair The Honourable George Baker, P.C., Deputy Chair SBK>QB SK>Q June 2017 CANADA This report may be cited as: Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, Delaying Justice is Denying Justice: An Urgent Need to Address Lengthy Court Delays in Canada (Final Report), June 2017. For more information please contact us by email [email protected] by phone: (613) 990-6087 toll-free: 1 800 267-7362 by mail: The Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, Senate, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0A4 This report can be downloaded at: www.senate-senat.ca/lcjc.asp Ce rapport est également offert en français Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 1 Priority Recommendations ....................................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 9 Canada’s Critical Delay Problem ............................................................................................................... 9 The Committee’s Study ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Historic Sites of Canada System Plan Will Provide Even Greater Opportunities for Canadians to Understand and Celebrate Our National Heritage
    PROUDLY BRINGING YOU CANADA AT ITS BEST National Historic Sites of Canada S YSTEM P LAN Parks Parcs Canada Canada 2 6 5 Identification of images on the front cover photo montage: 1 1. Lower Fort Garry 4 2. Inuksuk 3. Portia White 3 4. John McCrae 5. Jeanne Mance 6. Old Town Lunenburg © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, (2000) ISBN: 0-662-29189-1 Cat: R64-234/2000E Cette publication est aussi disponible en français www.parkscanada.pch.gc.ca National Historic Sites of Canada S YSTEM P LAN Foreword Canadians take great pride in the people, places and events that shape our history and identify our country. We are inspired by the bravery of our soldiers at Normandy and moved by the words of John McCrae’s "In Flanders Fields." We are amazed at the vision of Louis-Joseph Papineau and Sir Wilfrid Laurier. We are enchanted by the paintings of Emily Carr and the writings of Lucy Maud Montgomery. We look back in awe at the wisdom of Sir John A. Macdonald and Sir George-Étienne Cartier. We are moved to tears of joy by the humour of Stephen Leacock and tears of gratitude for the courage of Tecumseh. We hold in high regard the determination of Emily Murphy and Rev. Josiah Henson to overcome obstacles which stood in the way of their dreams. We give thanks for the work of the Victorian Order of Nurses and those who organ- ized the Underground Railroad. We think of those who suffered and died at Grosse Île in the dream of reaching a new home.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWS RELEASE for Immediate Release
    Développement économique et Tourisme / Economic Development and Tourism Comtés unis de Prescott et Russell / United Counties of Prescott and Russell 59 rue Court St., C.P./P.O. Box 304 L’Orignal, ON K0B 1K0 NEWS RELEASE For immediate release Glengarry-Prescott-Russell Day impresses a sixth time Toronto, October 7, 2015 – It was with great pride that the United Counties of Prescott and Russell (UCPR) and the Township of North Glengarry held the sixth edition of Glengarry-Prescott-Russell Day this afternoon at Queen's Park. Since 2008, Glengarry-Prescott-Russell Day has allowed the region to showcase local food products in front of the entire Legislative Assembly of the Government of Ontario as well as members of their staff. Once again this year, more than 200 people took part in the event, including Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne, Ministers Jeff Leal, Madeleine Meilleur, Eric Hoskins and Yasir Naqvi, and Glengarry-Prescott-Russell MPP Grant Crack. “This day is important for our region because it affords us a rare opportunity to showcase our local food at the Provincial Parliament and, at the same time, advance and discuss our ongoing projects,” stated Robert Kirby, Warden of the United Counties of Prescott and Russell. The eight regional mayors representing the UCPR as well as Council members of the Township of North Glengarry were equally in attendance, and benefited from the opportunity to meet with several Ministers and their staff in order to advance economic development projects in the region. The showcased regional products include those of the St-Albert Cheese Cooperative, L’Orignal Packing, Skotidakis Goat Farm (St-Eugène), Mariposa Farm (Plantagenet), Cakes On St-Philippe (Alfred), Prima Cossa (L’Orignal), Vert Fourchette (Vankleek Hill), La Binerie Plantagenet, Beau’s All Natural Brewing Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Good Intentions Beget Good Policy? Two Steps Forward and One Step Back in the Construction of Domestic Violence in Ontario
    Do Good Intentions Beget Good Policy? Two Steps Forward and One Step Back in the Construction of Domestic Violence in Ontario by April Lucille Girard-Brown A thesis submitted to the Department of Sociology In conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen‟s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada January, 2012 Copyright ©April Lucille Girard-Brown, 2012 Abstract The construction of domestic violence shifted and changed as this issue was forced from the private shadows to the public stage. This dissertation explores how government policy initiatives - Bill 117: An Act to Better Protect Victims of Domestic Violence and the Domestic Violence Action Plan (DVAP) - shaped our understanding of domestic violence as a social problem in the first decade of the twenty-first century in Ontario. Specifically, it asks whose voices were heard, whose were silenced, how domestic violence was conceptualized by various stakeholders. In order to do this I analyzed the texts of Bill 117, its debates, the DVAP, as well as fourteen in-depth interviews with anti- violence advocates in Ontario to shed light on their construction of the domestic violence problem. Then I examined who (both state and non-state actors) regarded the work as „successful‟, flawed or wholly ineffective. In particular, I focused on the claims and counter-claims advanced by MPPs, other government officials, feminist or other women‟s group advocates and men‟s or fathers‟ rights group supporters and organizations. The key themes derived from the textual analysis of documents and the interviews encapsulate the key issues which formed the dominant construction of domestic violence in Ontario between 2000 and 2009: the never-ending struggles over funding, debates surrounding issues of rights and responsibilities, solutions proposed to address domestic violence, and finally the continued appearance of deserving and undeserving victims in public policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Intervention and Resumption of the Rescue / Recovery (7:30 P.M
    CHAPTER Political Intervention and Resumption of the Rescue / Recovery (7:30 p.m. on June 25 to 6:00 a.m. on June 27) Political intervention was essential to the resumption of the rescue / recovery . 211 Key players within the Premier’s Office and the Cabinet Office ................................. 211 June 23 – The Premier’s Office is informed unofficially of possible fatalities and trapped persons in the collapse ........................................................................ 212 5:36 p.m. – The premier is advised of the collapse: He is eager to obtain more information ............ 212 6:08 p.m. – First official EMO notification: Someone is trapped in the collapse, and UCRT is being mobilized ............................................................................ 213 6:41 p.m. – Premier’s Office is informed there may be fatalities ..................................... 214 7:40 p.m. – Mr. O’Leary learns of two possible trapped persons and seeks information from the Ministry of Labour about the Mall ........................................................... 215 Mr. O’Leary informs his colleagues in the Premier’s Office of the possibility of two trapped persons in the collapse ..................................................................... 215 June 24 – The premier speaks to Mr. Mantha and Mayor Hamilton, and he learns officially of one possible fatality ........................................................................ 216 10:17 a.m. – The premier is updated on the collapse: Although there is no new information, he is reassured that things are unfolding as they should .......................................... 216 11:33 a.m. – The premier speaks to the mayor, advising of provincial support ........................ 218 12:28 p.m. – The premier issues a statement: The province and the premier “are on the file” ........... 218 3:25 p.m. – Minister Meilleur speaks to Michael Mantha: All resources from the Ministry of Community Safety will be made available ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario Ombudsman Turns 35 Years Young: Anniversary Pays Tribute To
    Ontario Ombudsman turns 35 years young: Anniversary pays tribute to former ombudsmen while reaffirming vital role amid “increasingly bureaucratic and depersonalized” society (TORONTO, November 1) – Not quite middle-aged but at a point well beyond the self- defining years, the Ontario Ombudsman’s Office turned 35 years young today, and marked the occasion with a gathering attended by Ministers, MPPs, and other distinguished guests including United Nations Ombudsman, John Barkat. The Honorable Roy McMurtry, former Ontario Chief Justice and Attorney General, recommended the appointment of the first ombudsman, Arthur Maloney in 1975. He has been a friend to each ombudsman ever since and in a speech paid tribute to Mr. Maloney and successive ombudsmen: Donald Morand (1979-84), Daniel Hill (1984-89), Roberta Jamieson (1989-99), Clare Lewis (2000-05), and André Marin (2005-Present). “In my view, the Office of the Ombudsman has served a legacy in which we all should be very proud. The Ontario Ombudsman has been an effective means of humanizing government and smoothing out the rough edges of relationships between the citizen and government and bureaucracy and bringing about important policy change.” Mr. McMurtry also emphasized the vital role the office plays today: “The reality is we live in a society that's becoming increasingly bureaucratic and depersonalized. Even with the best intentions, governments are becoming more remote from the citizens whom they serve. While individual members of the legislature continue to play a most vital role,
    [Show full text]
  • INSTIT WATCH Sum04
    institution watch SPRING 2009 G VOLUME 5, NUMBER 1 “An institution is any place in which people who have Monitoring the been labeled as having an intellectual disability are isolated, segregated and/or congregated. An institution is any place in progress toward which people do not have, or are not allowed to exercise a vision of full control over their lives and their day to day decisions. An institution is not defined merely by its size.” community living Deinstitutionalization Task Force for all persons with intellectual disabilities. This is a newsletter written and produced by the People First of Canada- Photo: Gary Beechey, BDS Studios CACL JointTask Force on On March 31, 2009, the last of the large government operated Deinstitutionalization. institutions for persons with intellectual disabilities in Ontario — For more information, Huronia Regional Centre, Rideau Regional Centre and contact Don Gallant at Southwestern Regional Centre — finally and officially closed. (416) 661-9611 or Shelley Rattai at (866) 854-8915. These closures signal a new era in Ontario — an era in which people of all abilities can contribute and participate fully in community. A day to celebrate — an era to embrace. COMMENTARY BY CATHERINE FRAZEE Professor of Distinction, School of Disability Studies at Ryerson University As reflection and response to the Freedom Tour film and the closure of Ontario’s Institutions, March 31, 2009 HAT CAN YOU SAY at a time like this? What can you say in a moment that is heavy with the honour and fierce conviction of the men and women who have Wbrought us this mighty film? What can you say when you are breathless from what you have just witnessed, not breathless from the crimes and degradations of these dark and ugly places, but breathless from the sheer force of so much survival, so much resistance, so much humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Moncton President Raymond Théberge Nominated for Federal Language Watchdog: Radio-Canada
    23 novembre 2017 – CBC New Brunswick University of Moncton president Raymond Théberge nominated for federal language watchdog: Radio-Canada Previous nominee, Madeleine Meilleur, withdrew her candidacy after controversy over political donation The president of the largest French-language university in Canada outside Quebec is the Liberal government's nominee to be the next commissioner of official languages, Radio-Canada is reporting. A Franco-Manitoban, Raymond Théberge has been president and vice-chancellor of the Moncton, N.B., university since 2012. Théberge previously served as a deputy minister, which is a senior non-political role, in the government of former Ontario Liberal Premier Dalton McGuinty. The official languages commissioner is an officer of Parliament whose job it is to ensure both official languages have equal status in federal institutions, legislation and in Parliament itself. The reported appointment comes after the previous nominee, Madeleine Meilleur, withdrew her candidacy after it emerged that the former Ontario Liberal cabinet minister had donated to the federal Liberal Party and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau when he was campaigning to head up the party. Théberge was never a member of the Liberal Party of Canada nor did he donate to the party, Radio-Canada reported. Before being officially appointed, a nominee must appear before a House of Commons committee, a process that could take a few weeks. When the Trudeau government first chose Meilleur as commissioner, Francophone groups and opposition parties sharply criticized her nomination, arguing the commissioner must be independent of any political influence. The process for nominating Meilleur was also criticized. The NDP argued the Liberals violated the Official Languages Act by not consulting opposition parties before making the nomination.
    [Show full text]
  • Re the Honourable Bob Chiarelli the Honourable Michael Coteau and the Honourable Yasir Naqvi, December 8
    Legislative Assemblée Assembly législative of Ontario de l’Ontario OFFICE OF THE INTEGRITY COMMISSIONER ~ REPORT OF THE HONOURABLE J. DAVID WAKE INTEGRITY COMMISSIONER RE: THE HONOURABLE BOB CHIARELLI, THE HONOURABLE MICHAEL COTEAU AND THE HONOURABLE YASIR NAQVI TORONTO, ONTARIO December 8, 2016 RE: THE HONOURABLE BOB CHIARELLI, THE HONOURABLE MICHAEL COTEAU AND THE HONOURABLE YASIR NAQVI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report relates to a request made by Catherine Fife, the Member of Provincial Parliament (MPP) for Kitchener-Waterloo, under section 30 of the Members’ Integrity Act, 1994 (the “ Act ”) about (1) Bob Chiarelli , MPP for Ottawa West-Nepean and Minister of Infrastructure, (2) Michael Coteau , MPP for Don Valley East and Minister of Child and Youth Services and (3) Yasir Naqvi , MPP for Ottawa Centre and Government House Leader and Attorney General (the “Ministers ”). Ms. Fife alleged that in contravention of section 2 of the Act the Ministers instructed staff in their respective ministerial offices to participate in partisan fundraising activities such that the Ministers furthered their own private interests by: (a) helping them to achieve the fundraising quotas assigned to them by the Ontario Liberal Party (the “ OLP ”) with the consent of the Premier, and (b) benefiting as future candidates from contributions to the OLP. Ms. Fife also alleged that by instructing their staff to engage in these activities, the Ministers blurred the lines between partisan fundraising and government business. In my opinion, the Ministers did not contravene section 2 of the Act because their private interests were not engaged. I found no evidence that fundraising quotas were assigned to the Ministers and that any benefit to them as future candidates would be too remote to be considered a private interest.
    [Show full text]