ICD-10 “New Normal” Overview the Changing Behavior of ICD-10 Coded Information

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ICD-10 “New Normal” Overview the Changing Behavior of ICD-10 Coded Information ICD-10 “New Normal” Overview The Changing Behavior of ICD-10 Coded Information August 2015 ICD-10 Transition Impacts ICD-10 will create a “New Normal” New Terminology and Concepts, some examples: • STEMI and Non-STEMI instead of “Heart Attack” or “AMI” • Underdosing and more Borderline conditions can be coded • New scales for Asthma (4 levels), Diabetes (5 levels), Coma, and other conditions • Episode of care indicators • Pregnancy coded in trimesters • Only 1 code to use for vaccinations • Routine exams split into “with” and “without findings” categories Data will behave differently, some examples: • Fewer heart attacks (coded for 4 weeks following infarct instead of 8 in ICD-9) • More cancer cases (anemia coded 2nd in ICD-10 after cancer, ICD-9 rule was opposite) when looking at primary Dx • No V codes for rehab visits, instead this is part of the episode of care digit • Pregnancies include new code for weeks gestation • More combination codes will cause some conditions harder to locate in queries (e.g. kidney failure due to diabetes) • Abnormal test findings will appear in more records • Smokers and patients exposed to tobacco smoke will appear more often 2 ICD-10 New Normal Overview Relationship between Coding and Clinical Documentation ICD, like any medical code set, reflects the information present in the medical record. Think of ICD-10 as a mature, or enhanced, version of ICD-9, that enables the significant detail already being captured in medical records to be captured equally well in coding. **Most clinical detail captured today is lost when translated to ICD-9** Consider this quote from Dan Riskin*, MD, CEO of Health Fidelity: “ICD-10 is not about going from a small number of codes to a moderate number of codes. The patient doesn’t actually care about that. And Meaningful Use 2 is not about reporting smokers. The country doesn’t actually care about that. These things are about getting sufficiently detailed information and sufficiently broad information that actually gets used in analytics to improve care, and yet we’re not really thinking about that all that much.” *About Dr. Riskin: Dan has developed and commercialized products in the fields of healthcare analytics, healthcare services, and medical devices. He was named one of the top 35 innovators under 35 by Technology Review and won the AMA Leadership Award in 2005. He subsequently served on the Obama Campaign Healthcare Advisory Committee in 2008. He has been an invited speaker on medical technology creation and venture development at the NIH, NSF, NASA, DARPA, IBM, HP, Harvard, Stanford, and MIT. Dan’s medical credentials include a MD from Boston University, residency in surgery at UCLA, and fellowship in critical care and acute care surgery at Stanford University. He is dual boarded in surgery and critical care and is on consulting faculty at Stanford University. His business training includes a MBA with a focus in biomedical engineering from MIT Sloan School of Management and the Stanford Biodesign Fellowship. 3 What is the Same, New, and Different? DIAGNOSES ICD-10 New Normal Overview New & Different - Diagnosis Data and transactions for these conditions and reasons for visit will behave differently • Abnormal Test Findings & Borderline Diagnoses • Acute Myocardial Infarction • Adverse Effects, Dosing, & Poisoning • Atherosclerosis, Angina & Hypertension • Coma • Diabetes Mellitus • Kidney Disease & Urosepsis • OB, Pregnancy, & Newborns • Oncology & Neoplasms • Orthopedics, Musculoskeletal, Injuries & Fractures • Routine Exams / Physicals • Vaccines / Immunizations 5 ICD-10 New Normal Overview Abnormal Test Findings & Borderline Dx are Different Abnormal Test Findings • In ICD-10-CM, Many new codes exist for abnormal findings if a related diagnosis is not coded, if a confirmed diagnosis is coded, the abnormal test result is not coded • In ICD-9-CM Only confirmed diagnoses are coded, and abnormal tests were often not captured in coding • Borderline Diagnoses – “borderline” is new term in ICD-10 • Terms described by the provider as “borderline” are coded as a confirmed, not a suspected, condition unless the Index has specific entry for a borderline condition • Other abnormal glucose – Borderline diabetes mellitus, R73.09 • Elevated blood pressure reading – Borderline hypertension, R03.0 • Low bone mineral density (BMD), borderline osteoporosis – Borderline osteopenia, M85.8 Data Behavior Implication – More abnormal test findings in data, more borderline diagnoses in data 6 ICD-10 New Normal Overview Adverse Effects, Dosing, Poisoning are New & Different • Drug Effects ICD-10-CM ICD-9-CM Grouped by drug, with codes for poisonings, adverse Grouped by effect, with no codes for underdosing. effects, and underdosing • Adverse effect codes – same as ICD-9 – identifies drugs producing side effects when taken correctly – First code is the nature of the adverse effect – Second code identifies the drug or chemical – More effects and types of drugs/chemicals available • Underdosing – new concept for ICD-10-CM, means taking less of a substance than is prescribed by a provider or according to manufacturer’s instruction – First code the relapse or exacerbation of the medical condition for which the drug is prescribed – Second code the drug that was not taken properly – Noncompliance codes used to identify intent if known (e.g. financially motivated, or elderly did not remember) • Poisoning codes – same as ICD-9 – means not ingesting the drug correctly (took too much, or mixed with alcohol or other substance/drugs) – Combination codes in ICD-10 explaining two facts – identify event + drug involved – Indicate if Accidental, Self Harm, Assault & Undetermined – External Cause code not needed – this concept is built in to poisoning code meanings – Additional codes used for manifestations Data Behavior Implication – Underdosing now appears in data, better detail why poisoning occurred and drugs/chemicals involved 7 ICD-10 New Normal Overview Asthma is Different Asthma • ICD-10 requires the following scales into documentation: – Mild intermittent – Mild persistent – Moderate persistent – Severe persistent • More instructions to code tobacco use/exposure ICD-9-CM ICD-10-CM 493.22 chronic J44.1 Chronic obstructive asthma, obstructive pulmonary with status disease with (acute) asthmaticus exacerbation J45.42 Moderate persistent asthma with status asthmaticus Z72.0 Tobacco use Data Behavior Implication – The varying degrees of asthma severity will be easier to identify and separate in health care data sets, more identification of patients who smoke/exposed to tobacco smoke 8 ICD-10 New Normal Overview Acute Myocardial Infarction is Different Acute Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) • Duration changed from 8 weeks in ICD-9 to 4 weeks in ICD-10 – Why? – Physicians are no longer treating the heart attack after the first 4 weeks, other ongoing conditions take precedence • The terms “Acute MI” or “AMI” is no longer used. Codes reflect newer terminology and distinguishes between ST elevation (STEMI) and non-ST elevation (NSTEMI) myocardial infarctions – STEMI of anterior wall, inferior wall, other sites, or ICD-9-CM ICD-10-CM unspecified site – NSTEMI (subendocardial, nontransmural) 410.71 I21.4 Non-ST-elevation Subendocardial (NSTEMI) myocardial • Category I21 used for initial treatment of STEMI and NSTEMI infarction, initial infarction and all continued treatment during next 4 weeks, but use episode of care I48.91 Fibrillation, atrial Category I22 for subsequent episode: or auricular Initial STEMI or NSTEMI Subsequent STEMI or NSTEMI during next 4 weeks Category I21 code used during 4 weeks after first episode Category I22 code used for episode that occurs within 4 weeks of occurred a previous STEMI or NSTEMI, regardless of site No concept of “initial” or “subsequent” myocardial Code both the I21 and I22 category codes Infarction in ICD-10 (Patient recovering from a heart attack had a new heart attack) Data Behavior Implication – Fewer records with heart attack diagnoses in the same patient population 9 ICD-10 New Normal Overview Atherosclerosis, Angina & Hypertension are Different Atherosclerosis, Angina & Hypertension Angina often occurs in combination codes for atherosclerotic heart disease • Coronary artery disease of native vessel and bypass grafts with angina pectoris, unstable angina, documented spasm or unspecified type – Eliminates the use of a second code for the angina – Angina is coded separately only when the cause is unrelated to heart disease Only one code for essential (primary) hypertension – I10 (Letter I, digits 10) – In ICD-10-CM, hypertension not classified by type (benign, malignant, unspecified) • Hypertension causing chronic kidney disease, heart disease or both heart and kidney disease have separate category codes, similar to ICD-9 ICD-9-CM ICD-10-CM 414.00 Coronary atherosclerosis, of I25.119 Atherosclerosis heart disease of unspecified type of vessel, native or graft native coronary artery with unspecified 413.9 Other and unspecified angina angina pectoris pectoris Data Behavior Implication – Fewer records with angina diagnoses in the same patient population, risk of excluding hypertension in data if not looking at combination codes with hypertension, more smokers 10 ICD-10 New Normal Overview Coma is Different • Neurological Coma scale codes in Section R40.2 • Used with traumatic brain injury, acute cerebrovascular disease or sequela of CVA • 1 code for total coma scale score – or 3 codes for – Eyes open – Best verbal response – Best motor response •
Recommended publications
  • In an Ehr World
    10.5 IDEAS TO THRIVE IN AN EHR WORLD PUBLISHED BY “The future is already here - it’s just not evenly distributed.” William Gibson (in 1993) INTRODUCTION: Most of our industry’s attention thus far has gone towards implementing electronic health record systems (EHRs). While it seems to be end in itself, rolling out an EHR is one of the many building blocks towards a digital platform that can change how healthcare is delivered. This paper gives 10.5 ideas that can help doctors, clinicians and administrators save time and therefore money in an EHR world. These ideas exist as early signals in our industry. It’s only a matter of time when these signals amplify to become an accepted norm. ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Praveen Suthrum, (Twitter: @suthrum) Praveen Suthrum is the President and Co-founder of NextServices, a healthcare management and technology company. He works on product design and technology. He contributed to The New Age of Innovation (by C.K. Prahalad and M.S. Krishnan) that was named the best book on innovation by The Economist in 2008. He has an MBA from The Ross School of Business at University of Michigan and attended Singularity University. Praveen loves to trek and has most recently climbed Mt. Kilimanjaro. 1 Get your records through a mobile cloud. Look at patients, not a computer. Your bank account, trading account, email, family pictures are all on the cloud - you can even access them through your iPad. More than the money required to keep servers running, taking back-ups and engaging IT staff, server-based systems waste time that can be spent elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Intelligence: the Key to Unlocking Novel Real-World Data?
    Artificial Intelligence: The Key to Unlocking Novel Real-World Data? While Artificial intelligence stands to make significant contributions to clinical research due to its unparalleled ability to translate unstructured data into real-world evidence (RWE), significant challenges remain in achieving regulatory-grade evidence. By Michele Cleary 16 | March/April 2019 Value & Outcomes Spotlight Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing healthcare services. From improving disease detection to supporting treatment decision making, AI has become ubiquitous in care delivery. Now AI is poised to transform the drug and device development process, helping researchers refine the approval process and significantly cutting both the time and the expense needed to bring products to market. While AI has long been used to facilitate recruitment of study subjects, optimize study design, and support patient adherence to study protocols, AI’s greatest contribution to clinical research may still be on the horizon— unlocking the data richness that lies within the mountains of novel real- world data (RWD) sources. This article explores how AI may improve clinical research through its ability to better translate RWD into real-world evidence (RWE), thus providing more valid evidence of clinical benefits and risks. Dan Riskin, MD, of Verantos, Rich Glinklich, MD of OM1, and Sebastian Schneeweiss, MD of Aetion all shared their valuable insights into how AI is transforming clinical research. THE SEARCH FOR REGULATORY-GRADE DATA With innovations in digital data, HEOR researchers are facing explosive growth in novel RWD sources. But as researchers move from traditional RWD sources (eg, registries and claims data) to these novel data sources, unstructured data present a significant opportunity and challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario Biology Day 2014 Abstracts
    Ontario Biology Day 2014 University of Toronto Mississauga March 22-23, 2014 Abstracts We would like to thank our sponsors Titanium Sponsor Platinum Sponsors Office of the VP Research, UTM Office of the Dean University of Toronto Mississauga Fluid Surveys 2 Gold Sponsors Canadian Society of Zoologists 3 Ontario Biology Day 2014 March 22-23 University of Toronto Mississauga Conference Organizing Committee Daniel Almeida Lisa Cheung Yen Du Sanja Hinic-Frlog Aaron LeBlanc Fiona Rawle Audrey Reid Christoph Richter Published by: University of Toronto Mississauga Department of Biology 3359 Mississauga Road Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6 http://www.utm.utoronto.ca/biology Twitter: @UTMBiology Copyright 2014 Logo Design by Scott Winrow 4 Welcome to Ontario Biology Day 2014 at the University of Toronto Mississauga! We are thrilled to welcome you to the 27th annual Ontario sponsors by signing the “Thank you to our sponsors” card at the Biology Day (OBD) undergraduate student research conference. registration desk. And importantly, we would like to extend a On behalf of the Department of Biology at the University of thank you to all of the supervisors and students that have Toronto Mississauga, we wish you the best of success in travelled to the conference this weekend to present their work presenting your research to your peers this weekend, and and share in this conference experience. This conference is a congratulate you on your achievement in undergraduate biology celebration of your research, and we congratulate you on your research. hard work and research achievements. OBD is an annual event that showcases and celebrates biology Sincerely, research conducted by undergraduate students across Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Expanding the Use of Real- World Evidence in Regulatory and Value-Based Payment Decision-Making for Drugs and Biologics July 2019 LEADERSHIP William H
    Expanding the Use of Real- World Evidence in Regulatory and Value-Based Payment Decision-Making for Drugs and Biologics July 2019 LEADERSHIP William H. Frist, M.D. Mark McClellan, M.D., Ph.D. Former U.S. Senate Majority Leader Robert J. Margolis Professor of Business, Medicine, Senior Fellow, Bipartisan Policy Center and Policy, Duke University Founding Director, Duke-Margolis Center for Robert Califf, M.D., Ph.D. Health Policy Professor of Medicine, Donald F. Fortin, M.D., Former Administrator, Centers for Medicare and Professor of Cardiology, Duke School of Medicine Medicaid Services Member, Duke Clinical Research Institute Former Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration Former Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration Andrew von Eschenbach, M.D. President, Samaritan Health Initiatives Former Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration Former Director, National Cancer Institute Senior Fellow, Bipartisan Policy Center STAFF G. William Hoagland Janet M. Marchibroda Senior Vice President Fellow, Bipartisan Policy Center CONSULTANTS Gregory Daniel, Ph.D., R.Ph. Morgan Romine Deputy Director, Duke Margolis Center for Research Director, Duke Margolis Center for Health Policy Health Policy Clinical Professor, Fuqua School of Business, Mark Segal, Ph.D., FHIMSS Duke University Principal, Digital Health Policy Advisors ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Bipartisan Policy Center would like to thank the Jayne Koskinas Ted Giovanis Foundation for Health and Policy for their generous support for this project. BPC would like to thank the leadership of this effort, including Senator Bill Frist, Dr. Rob Califf, Dr. Mark McClellan, and Dr. Andrew von Eschenbach, for their guidance, as well as Morgan Romine, Gregory Daniel, Mark Segal, and Ann Gordon who contributed to the development of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Programs Director for IT Services Research and Where He Created the Global IT Service Research and Innovation Institute, SRII (
    SRII China Summit 2015 Theme: Innovating Digital Economy — Advancing Industry 4.0 Transformation Time: March 4-6, 2015 Venue: Shanghai, China Background Advanced Industrial Technology Research Institute in Shanghai Jiao Tong University(AITRI) is excited to team up with Service Research & Innovation Institute (SRII) to host 2015 SRII China Summit:Innovating Digital Economy— Advancing Industry 4.0 Transformation from March 4th to 6th, 2015 in Shanghai Lingang New City. Senior leaders from key industry sectors, academia, research, government and professional organizations in India, Asia, Europe and USA will be invited to discuss IOT, big data, Industry 4.0, Smart-Healthcare, Education and other related topics. The summit is well aligned with innovation agenda for industry upgrade and emerging market in Shanghai as well as in China. SRII (Service Research & Innovation Institute) is a global ICT Research & Innovation Institute with a mission to drive ICT Innovation (Cloud computing, Mobile Services, Big data analytics, Security, Social) for major sectors of service economy (government, education, healthcare, transportation, manufacturing, agriculture & food safety, and etc) around the world. SRII member include senior leaders from industry, academia, research and government organizations from around the world. Advanced Industrial Research Institute (AITRI) promotes the emerging pillar industries transferred from the high-tech research findings by maximizing the market value of the industrial technologies. AITRI is building an international
    [Show full text]
  • Obituary: Thomas Henry Kunz (1938–2020)
    applyparastyle "fig//caption/p[1]" parastyle "FigCapt" applyparastyle "fig" parastyle "Figure" Journal of Mammalogy, 101(6):1752–1780, 2020 DOI:10.1093/jmammal/gyaa100 Published online November 20, 2020 Obituary: Thomas Henry Kunz (1938–2020) Dr. Thomas Henry Kunz (Fig. 1), an internationally rec- Tom’s early interest in science was sparked by a fifth-grade ognized expert on the ecology and behavior of bats and teacher who had her students undertake a project raising silk- Professor at Boston University, passed away on 13 April 2020 worms. Tom commented in his autobiography that, “This ex- in Dedham, Massachusetts, at the age of 81 as the result of perience left an indelible impression on me, and highlights the complications from COVID-19. Tragically, Dr. Kunz’s career power of observational learning” (197:150). Tom also had an was cut short when he was the victim of a pedestrian–auto- early experience with a bat colony inside a stove in a fishing mobile accident on 26 October 2011. He was struck crossing cabin. After chasing and removing the bats from the cabin, a street in Toronto, Canada, while participating in his favorite Tom recalled, “being fascinated by these little winged ‘crit- annual meeting, that of the North American Society for Bat ters’” (197:150). Tom became an Eagle Scout and remembered Research (NASBR). He never fully recovered from the head taking great pride in earning his nature merit badge, which re- trauma suffered and was not able to live independently, but quired learning the names of local plants and animals. When he enjoyed daily visits from his wife and frequent visits from Tom graduated from high school, he was planning to attend his children and grandchildren as well as friends.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 100 AI Leaders in Drug Discovery and Advanced Healthcare Introduction
    Top 100 AI Leaders in Drug Discovery and Advanced Healthcare www.dka.global Introduction Over the last several years, the pharmaceutical and healthcare organizations have developed a strong interest toward applying artificial intelligence (AI) in various areas, ranging from medical image analysis and elaboration of electronic health records (EHRs) to more basic research like building disease ontologies, preclinical drug discovery, and clinical trials. The demand for the ML/AI technologies, as well as for ML/AI talent, is growing in pharmaceutical and healthcare industries and driving the formation of a new interdisciplinary industry (‘data-driven healthcare’). Consequently, there is a growing number of AI-driven startups and emerging companies offering technology solutions for drug discovery and healthcare. Another important source of advanced expertise in AI for drug discovery and healthcare comes from top technology corporations (Google, Microsoft, Tencent, etc), which are increasingly focusing on applying their technological resources for tackling health-related challenges, or providing technology platforms on rent bases for conducting research analytics by life science professionals. Some of the leading pharmaceutical giants, like GSK, AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Novartis, are already making steps towards aligning their internal research workflows and development strategies to start embracing AI-driven digital transformation at scale. However, the pharmaceutical industry at large is still lagging behind in adopting AI, compared to more traditional consumer industries -- finance, retail etc. The above three main forces are driving the growth in the AI implementation in pharmaceutical and advanced healthcare research, but the overall success depends strongly on the availability of highly skilled interdisciplinary leaders, able to innovate, organize and guide in this direction.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOE 273, MED 273 Biodesign for Mobile Health Fall Quarter – Academic Year 2017/2018
    BIOE 273, MED 273 Biodesign for Mobile Health Fall Quarter – Academic Year 2017/2018 Rev. 05.14.2017 Health care is facing significant cross-industry challenges and opportunities created by a number of factors including: an increasing need for improved access to affordable, high-quality care; a growing demand from consumers for greater control of their health and health data; a shift in focus from “sick care” to prevention and health optimization; aging demographics and the increased burden of chronic conditions; and new emphasis on real-world, measurable health outcomes for individuals and populations. Moreover, the delivery of health information and services is no longer tied to traditional “brick and mortar” hospitals and clinics: it has increasingly become "mobile," enabled by apps, sensors, wearables, and other mobile devices, as well as by the data that these technologies generate. This multifactorial transformation presents opportunities for innovation across the entire cycle of care, from wellness, to acute and chronic diseases, to care at the end of life. But how does one approach innovation in mobile health to address these health care challenges while ensuring the greatest chance of success? At Stanford Biodesign, we believe that innovation is a process that can be learned, practiced, and perfected; and, it starts with a need. In Biodesign for Mobile Health, students will learn about mobile health and the Biodesign needs-driven innovation process from over 50 industry experts. Over the course of ten weeks, these speakers join the teaching team in a dynamic classroom environment that includes lectures, panel discussions, and breakout sessions. These experts represent startups, corporations, venture capital firms, accelerators, research labs, health organizations, and more.
    [Show full text]
  • ISPOR 2019 the Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research
    ISPOR 2019 The professional society for health economics and outcomes research May 18-22, 2019 Rapid. Disruptive. Innovative: A New Era in HEOR Program and Schedule of Events #ISPORAnnual NETWORK: ISPOR2019 / WI-FI PASSWORD: HEALTHCORE www.ispor.org ISPOR 2019 May 18-22 Rapid. Disruptive. Innovative: A New Era in HEOR Table of Contents ISPOR 2019 AGENDA AT A GLANCE 4 CONFERENCE PROGRAM COMMITTEE 9 CONFERENCE SPONSORS 10 PLENARY SESSIONS 11 SCHEDULE OF EVENTS l SATURDAY, MAY 18 14 l SUNDAY, MAY 19 17 l MONDAY, MAY 20 21 l TUESDAY, MAY 21 29 l WEDNESDAY, MAY 22 37 INVITATIONAL GROUP MEETINGS 42 POSTER OVERVIEW 46 EXHIBIT PROGRAM OVERVIEW 47 EXHIBITOR LISTING 48 POSTER AND EXHIBIT HALL FLOOR PLAN 49 2019 ISPOR AWARDS PROGRAM 50 KEY INFORMATION 62 CONFERENCE ROOMS FLOOR PLAN 63 www.ispor.org 3 ISPOR 2019 May 18-22 | New Orleans, LA, USA ISPOR 2019 Agenda-at-a-Glance Saturday, May 18, 2019 7:00AM - 7:00PM REGISTRATION HELP DESK HOURS 8:00AM - 12:00PM SHORT COURSE MORNING SESSION 8:00AM - 5:00PM SHORT COURSE FULL DAY 1:00PM - 5:00PM SHORT COURSE AFTERNOON SESSION 5:30PM - 6:30PM EDUCATIONAL SYMPOSIUM Sunday, May 19, 2019 7:00AM - 7:00PM REGISTRATION HELP DESK HOURS 8:00AM - 10:00PM EXHIBITOR MOVE-IN 8:00AM - 12:00PM SHORT COURSE MORNING SESSION 12:00PM - 6:00PM SPEAKER READY ROOM HOURS 1:00PM - 5:00PM SHORT COURSE AFTERNOON SESSION 5:00PM - 7:00PM ISPOR STUDENT RESEARCH COMPETITION 5:30PM - 6:30PM EDUCATIONAL SYMPOSIUM 6:30PM - 7:30PM ISPOR PRESIDENTIAL RECEPTION (BY INVITATION ONLY) 7:00PM - 8:00PM ISPOR STUDENT & FACULTY ICEBREAKER RECEPTION
    [Show full text]
  • Expanding the Use of Real- World Evidence in Regulatory and Value-Based Payment Decision-Making for Drugs and Biologics August 2019 LEADERSHIP William H
    Expanding the Use of Real- World Evidence in Regulatory and Value-Based Payment Decision-Making for Drugs and Biologics August 2019 LEADERSHIP William H. Frist, M.D. Mark McClellan, M.D., Ph.D. Former U.S. Senate Majority Leader Robert J. Margolis Professor of Business, Medicine, Senior Fellow, Bipartisan Policy Center and Policy, Duke University Founding Director, Duke-Margolis Center for Robert Califf, M.D., Ph.D. Health Policy Professor of Medicine, Donald F. Fortin, M.D., Former Administrator, Centers for Medicare and Professor of Cardiology, Duke School of Medicine Medicaid Services Member, Duke Clinical Research Institute Former Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration Former Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration Andrew von Eschenbach, M.D. President, Samaritan Health Initiatives Former Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration Former Director, National Cancer Institute Senior Fellow, Bipartisan Policy Center STAFF G. William Hoagland Janet M. Marchibroda Senior Vice President Fellow, Bipartisan Policy Center CONSULTANTS Gregory Daniel, Ph.D., R.Ph. Morgan Romine Deputy Director, Duke Margolis Center for Research Director, Duke Margolis Center for Health Policy Health Policy Clinical Professor, Fuqua School of Business, Mark Segal, Ph.D., FHIMSS Duke University Principal, Digital Health Policy Advisors ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Bipartisan Policy Center would like to thank the Jayne Koskinas Ted Giovanis Foundation for Health and Policy for their generous support for this project. BPC would like to thank the leadership of this effort, including Senator Bill Frist, Dr. Rob Califf, Dr. Mark McClellan, and Dr. Andrew von Eschenbach, for their guidance, as well as Morgan Romine, Gregory Daniel, Mark Segal, and Ann Gordon who contributed to the development of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Academic Year 2012–2013
    report card academic year 2012–2013 Executive Summary Alberta, Canada, The lifeblood of all universities is human curiosity, imagination, creativity, and action, borne out of a genuine desire to know and understand the world and and the world humanity more clearly and accurately. These ideals may be lofty but the results are tangible, with measurable benefits befalling not only students, staff, and benefit from the faculty, but also the broader communities of which they are a part. Alberta, Canada, and the world benefit from the learning and discovery that occurs daily learning and at the University of Alberta. discovery that What are those benefits? Advances in knowledge, better health, increased social cohesion, and economic growth. A highly skilled workforce. Spinoff companies. occurs daily at Leaders and innovators with vision and skill. A large majority of U of A graduates choose to live and build their careers within the province. Both the historical and the University the current record show that U of A alumni and faculty have provided essential leadership in every sector of society—whether we speak of the province’s of Alberta. vibrant theatre community, its strengths in health care, or its world-leading K–12 educational system. Given that Alberta projects a labour shortage of 114,000 workers over the next decade—62,000 of whom will require a post-secondary education—it is clear that the U of A is filling an essential role in society. We are doing so because of our sustained commitment to excellence and to our goal of building a great university equal to the best public universities in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Dan Riskin Founder, Health Fidelity Consulting Faculty, Stanford University
    Statement of Dan Riskin Founder, Health Fidelity Consulting faculty, Stanford University Before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Communications & Technology and Subcommittee on Healthcare Hearing on “21st Century Technology for 21st Century Cures” July 17, 2014 Post-hearing Questions Testimony of Dan Riskin Committee on Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Communications & Technology and Subcommittee on Healthcare Questions from the Honorable Joe Pitts 1. The characteristics of big data - Velocity, Variety and Volume - are often minimized when used for healthcare due to the complexity and restraints of HIPAA. Does Congress need to take a fresh look at our privacy laws to enable patients to become “data donors”, giving consent to allow their medical data to be shared for longitudinal research. This question strikes at the heart of how clinical data can be valuable not just for daily patient care, but also for making the practice of healthcare more effective and efficient. Congress could significantly benefit the nation if it took a fresh look at privacy laws to examine how patients can be empowered to consent to specific uses of their data to advance medicine. The big data opportunity to advance the practice of healthcare is powerful. Based on direction from Congress, an immense quantity of clinical data is now being collected. There is an opportunity to mine these data to understand more effective and efficient clinical approaches that leverage clinical observations, genetic information, consumer biometrics, and consumer observations. Research has been hindered by inability to consistently extract full clinical data from the electronic health record (interoperability) and inability of patients to consistently authorize use of their data for such research (consent).
    [Show full text]