DOCSLIB.ORG

United States Department of the Interior National Park Service

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NFS Form 10-900a OMBNo. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section Page SUPPLEMENTARY LISTING RECORD NRIS Reference Number: 06000913 Date Listed: 9/25/2006 Fair Oaks Bridge, Old Sacramento CA Property Name County State N/A Multiple Name This property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places in accordance with the attached nomination documentation subject to the following exceptions, exclusions, or amendments, notwithstanding the National Park Service certification included in the nomination documentation. / Signature 6f the Keeper Date of Action Amended^!terns in Nomination: Significance: The correct Level of Significance is: Local [The nomination form certification block and transmittal letter differed from the narrative text.] Description: The Architectural Classification should read: Pennsylvania Petit truss bridge These clarifications were confirmed with the CA SHPO office DISTRIBUTION: National Register property file Nominating Authority (without nomination attachment) NPS Form 10-900 OMBNo. 1024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties an( plete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Co item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property____________________________________________________ historic name Old Fair Oaks Bridge_________________________________ other names/site number American River Bridge at Fair Oaks 2. Location_________________________________________________________ Street & number Crosses American River at Bridge St. to American River Parkway N. of Upper Sunrise Dr. in Gold River I I DOt for publication N/A city or town Fair Oaks_________________________________[H vicinity N/A state California code CA county Sacramento code 067 zip code 95628 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designate d authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1 986, as amended, I hereby certify that this E3 nomination D request fo/3i termination of eligibility/meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Plfcfes i nd meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property \% meets Odo« s not meet the National Ragister Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant D nationally D statewide! E3 ocally. ( D See coritinlatipn sheet for additional comments.) i^i_^v^ A^r^ ^ AU6-XOOC* Signature of cert fying official Title Date California Office of Historic P eservation State or Federal agency and ureau In my opinion, the property D meets Q does not meet the National Register criteria. ( D See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service Certification srtify that this property is: Date of Action 3d in the National Register D See continuation sheet. D determined eligible for the National Register D See continuation sheet. D determined not eligible for the National Register D removed from the National Register D other (explain): ________ Old Fair Oaks Bridge Sacramento. CA Name of Property County and State 5. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property (Check as many boxes as apply) (Check only one box) (Do not include previously listed resources in the count.) Contributing Noncontributing PI private H] building(s) _____________________ buildings ^ public-local HH district ___ sites HH public-State Dsite 1 structures O public-Federal [3 structure objects n object 1 0 Total Name of related multiple property listing Number of contributing resources previously listed in (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) the National Register N/A N/A 6. Function or Use Historic Functions Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) Transportation / Rail-related Transportation / Pedestrian-related Transportation / Road-related (vehicular) Transportation / Pedestrian-related______ 7. Description Architectural Classification Materials (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) Other ^^_ foundation Concrete piers roof N/A________ walls N/A other Bridge: Metal (steel) Fencing: Metal Pathway: Trex Decking, which is made a combination of reclaimed wood and plastic Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) See attached Continuation Sheets Old Fair Oaks Bridge Sacramento, CA Name of Property County and State 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria Areas of Significance (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property (Enter categories from instructions) for National Register listing) Transportation______ [>3 A Property is associated with events that have made Engineering a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. Community Planning and Development D B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. E<]c Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack Period of Significance individual distinction. 1907-1955 n D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations (Mark "X" in all the boxes that apply.) Property is: C3 A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. Significant Person n B removed from its original location. (Complete if Criterion B is marked above) D C a birthplace or a grave. N/A__________________ n D a cemetery. Cultural Affiliation N/A_______ D E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. n F a commemorative property. CU G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance Architect/Builder within the past 50 years. Designer: Givan, A., C.E. and Phinney, C.M., SacCS Contractor: Western Bridge and Construction Company of Omaha ___ Narrative Statement of Significance (Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) See attached Continuation Sheets Old Fair Oaks Bridge Sacramento. CA Name of Property County and State 9. Major Bibliographical References (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets.) • See attached Continuation Sheets Previous documentation on file (NPS): Primary Location of Additional Data n preliminary determination of individual listing (36 E3 State Historic Preservation Office CFR 67) has been requested, E3 Other State agency D Federal agency n previously listed in the National Register D Local government ^ previously determined eligible by the National D University Register E3 Other D designated a National Historic Landmark Name of repository: D recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey California Department of Transportation 1120 N Street #______________ Sacramento, California 95814 D recorded by Historic American Engineering Sacramento Archives and Museum Collection Center Record # _______ 551 Sequoia Pacific Blvd. Sacramento, CA 95814 10. Geographical Data Acreage of Property Less than 1 acre UTM References (Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet) Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing 1 _1Q 651000 4277824 3 _ ____ ____ 2 ____ _____ 4 _ ____ _____ See continuation sheet. Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) »:» See attached Continuation Sheets Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected on a continuation sheet.) * See attached Continuation Sheets 11. Form Prepared By name/title Paul J. P. Sandul. PhD Candidate/Part-Time Faculty (Lecturer-U.S. History)______ organization California State University. Sacramento____________ date January 26. 2006 street & number 10741 Fair Oaks Blvd. # 39_______________ telephone 916-966-0751 city or town Fair Oaks state CA zip code 95628 Old Fair Oaks Bridge Sacramento. CA Name ot Property County and State Additional Documentation___________________________________________________ Submit the following items with the completed form: Continuation Sheets * See attached Continuation Sheets: o Narrative Description (Section 7) o Narrative Statement of Significance (Section 8) o Major Bibliographical References (Section 9) o Verbal Boundary Description (Section 10) o Boundary Justification (Section 10) o Copies of selected material from Caltrans' 1985 Request for Determination of Eligibility for Inclusion in the National Register. A Report submitted to, and on file with, the California State Historic Preservation Officer, California Office of Historic Preservation,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Recalling the Suburban Side of California’S Agricultural Colonization
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY Sacramento And UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Harvesting Suburbs: Recalling the Suburban Side of California’s Agricultural Colonization A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Public History by Paul Jason Prescott Sandul Committee in charge: Professor Lee M. A. Simpson, Chair (CSUS) Professor Randolph Bergstrom (UCSB) Professor Christopher J. Castaneda (CSUS) Professor Mary Hancock (UCSB) June 2009 The dissertation of Paul Jason Prescott Sandul is approved. _____________________________________________ Randolph Bergstrom, UCSB _____________________________________________ Christopher J. Castaneda, CSUS _____________________________________________ Mary Hancock, UCSB _____________________________________________ Lee M. A. Simpson, Committee Chair, CSUS June 2009 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people helped me while I worked on my dissertation. Professors and faculty at California State University, Sacramento (CSUS) and University California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) at every point provided me with support and vital insights. Professors Mona Siegel and Harold Marcuse, for example, introduced me to memory studies while Professor Charles Postel took time to read early essays and drafts and make important suggestions. My committee members were, to be sure, especially important. Professor Christopher J. Castaneda, I swear, never leaves his office. Anytime I ever needed advice, council, or simply to talk, I could always find Professor Castaneda’s door open and, regardless of how busy he seemed, an open chair. He always provided keen insight, critical and helpful commentary, and, most important for a secluded graduate student, many lunches at a good restaurant. Professor Randolph Bergstrom first introduced me and guided my original inquires into the intersection of place, memory, and history. With the quickest and sharpest wit of any person I have ever known, his guidance was indispensable, his support unwavering, and direction always needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment/Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration
    Environmental Assessment/Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Lower American River Anadromous Fish Habitat Restoration Project U.S. Department of the Interior City of Sacramento Bureau of Reclamation Mid Pacific Region June 2019 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Table of Contents List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................ ii Section 1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................ 1 1.2 Project Purpose, Need, and Objectives ................................. 6 Section 2. Alternatives Including the Proposed Action .................................. 8 2.1 No Action Alternative ............................................................. 8 2.2 Proposed Action ..................................................................... 8 Section 3. Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences ........ 24 3.1 Aesthetics ............................................................................. 25 3.2 Agriculture
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties
    A Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Table of Contents A.1 Early Notification Announcement A-1 A.1.1 Early Notification Letter, December 4, 2012 ................................................................................ A-3 A.1.2 Legal Notice Publication, December 9, 2012 ............................................................................. A-13 A.1.3 Comments .................................................................................................................................. A-19 A.2 Project Information Meetings A-35 A.2.1 Project Meeting Notification Letters, August 27, 2013 ............................................................... A-37 A.2.2 Dates, Locations and Attendance .............................................................................................. A-57 A.2.3 Comments .................................................................................................................................. A-59 A.3 Section 106 Consultation A-65 A.3.1 Section 106 Consultation Letters, November 2013 ................................................................... A-67 A.3.2 Comments from the November 2013 Letters ........................................................................... A-107 A.3.3 Section 106 Consultation Letters, April 8, 2014 ....................................................................... A-115 A.3.4 Section 106 Concurrence Letters............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties
    Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Table of Contents A.1 Early Notification Announcement ...................................................................................... A-1 A.1.1 Early Notification Letter, December 4, 2012 .......................................................................... A-3 A.1.2 Legal Notice Publication, December 9, 2012 ....................................................................... A-13 A.1.3 Comments from the Early Notification Announcement ........................................................ A-19 A.2 Project Meetings ................................................................................................................ A-35 A.2.1 Project Meeting Notification Letters, August 27, 2013 ......................................................... A-37 A.2.2 Project Meeting Sign-In Sheets, September 2013 ............................................................... A-59 A.2.3 Comments from the Project Meeting ................................................................................... A-65 A.3 Section 106 Consultation .................................................................................................. A-71 A.3.1 Section 106 Consultation Letter, November 21, 2013 ......................................................... A-73 A.3.2 Comments from the Section 106 Consultation Letter .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • State Historical Resources Commission 2006 Annual Report
    STATE HISTORICAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Port of San Francisco Embarcadero, San Francisco County, California. Listed in the National Register of Historic Places on May 12, 2006 at the State level of significance. 2006 ANNUAL REPORT Office of Historic Preservation California State Parks The Resources Agency State of California January 2007 This publication has been financed in part with federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsements or recommendations by the Department of the Interior. This program received federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability, or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office of Equal Opportunity, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20240. STATE HISTORICAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Dr. Robert & Mary Walton House, Stanislaus County, California. This house was designed by Frank Lloyd Wright and was recommended for listing in the National Register of Historic Places on August 5, 2006. 2006 ANNUAL REPORT Office of Historic Preservation California State Parks 1416 9th Street, Room 1442 Post Office Box 942896 Sacramento, California 94296-0001 Phone: (916) 653-6624 Fax: (916) 652-9824 Website: www.ohp.parks.ca.gov January 2007 STATE OF CALIFORNIA – THE RESOURCES AGENCY Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPARTMENTOF PARKS AND RECREATION P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower American River Anadromous Fish Habitat Restoration Project
    Environmental Assessment/Initial Study and Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Lower American River Anadromous Fish Habitat Restoration Project U.S. Department of the Interior City of Sacramento Bureau of Reclamation Mid Pacific Region June 2019 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Table of Contents List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................ ii Section 1. Introduction ....................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................ 1 1.2 Project Purpose, Need, and Objectives ................................. 7 Section 2. Alternatives Including the Proposed Action .................................. 8 2.1 No Action Alternative ............................................................. 8 2.2 Proposed Action ..................................................................... 8 Section 3. Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences ........ 23 3.1 Aesthetics ............................................................................. 24 3.2 Agriculture
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons 1-8 (Pdf)
    lesson 1 Transportation INTRODUCING THE SACRAMENTO HISTORY ONLINE COLLECTION OVERVIEW This lesson introduces students to the documents in the Sacramento History Online Collection (SHO) at http://www.sacramentohistory.org and the role of primary sources in understanding history. It focuses on how materials that have survived from the past can be used to reconstruct the story of how a community has changed over time. Before using the database with your class, take some time to browse the SHO collection online to get an overview of the types of documents that are included. (These lessons use the term document to refer to any of the items in the database, including photographs). You can view or print most single images directly as a JPEG file. However, some documents are in Adobe Acrobat PDF format and must be viewed or printed with Acrobat Reader. Lesson 1 does not require students to work online. STUDENT OBJECTIVES 1. Describe the differences between a primary source and a textbook. 2. Give several examples of the types of documents that are in the SHO collection. 3. Categorize a group of items according to their document type. 4. List modern ephemera that might offer clues about your own community. CALIFORNIA HISTORY STANDARDS This lesson emphasizes database search strategies and how to use the collection to find information about transportation rather than teaching specific history content. BACKGROUND ARTICLE 1 The Sacramento History Online Collection (pages 1-5 and 1-6) STUDENT ACTIVITY SHEET 1 AND KEY Introducing the Sacramento History Online Collection (pages 1-7 and 1-8) DOCUMENTS TO DISCUSS (view online or print) The documents shown below provide examples of the different document types in the SHO collection, including books, ephemera, manuscripts, maps, photographs, postcards, prints, and technical drawings.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Truss Bridges in California Thematic Determination of Eligibility
    NATIONAL REGISTER DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY: HISTORIC TRUSS BRIDGES IN CALIFORNIA (THEMATIC) Determined eligible on December 24, 1985 by the KEEPER of the National Register of Historic Places (With subsequent determinations by the Keeper on January 9, 1986 and January 13, 1986) Historic Truss Bridges in California (Thematic) 1985 Keeper Formal DOE With Subsequent DOEs Jan. 9 & 13, 1986 Request for Determination of Eligibility for Inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places 1. Agency Requesting Determination: u.s. Department of Transportation: Federal Highway Administration Attn: Bruce Cannon California Division Administrator P.O. Box 1915 Sacramento, CA 95809 2. Properties: Historic Truss Bridges in California 1 Historic Truss Bridges in California (Thematic) 1985 Keeper Formal DOE With Subsequent DOEs Jan. 9 & 13, 1986 3. LOCATION: This thematic request for determination of eligibility concerns 72 historic truss bridges located throughout the State of California. Location -- by county, nearest city, highway, ) feature intersected, and UTM Coordinates -- is identified for each structure in the attached "Truss Bridge Rating Sheets." 4. CLASSIFICATION: The classification for this determination of eligibility is "thematic group." Each individual bridge is classified as a "structure." 5. OWNERSHIP: BRIDGE NUMBER: 26C-8; 26C-ll County of Amador 108 Court street Jackson, California 95642 BRIDGE NUMBER: 12C-8 County of Butte 7 County Center Drive oroville, California 95965 BRIDGE NUMBER: 30C-16 County of Calaveras Government Center 891 Mountain Ranch Road San Andreas, California 95249 J BRIDGE NUMBER: 15C-8 County of Colusa 546 Jay Street Colusa, California 95932 BRIDGE NUMBER: 25C-4; 25C-25 County of El Dorado 360 Fair Lane Placerville, California 95667 BRIDGE NUMBER: 42C-551 County of Fresno 4499 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4.3 Vulnerability Assessment
    4.3 Vulnerability Assessment Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(ii): [The risk assessment shall include a] description of the jurisdiction’s vulnerability to the hazards described in paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section. This description shall include an overall summary of each hazard and its impact on the community. Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(ii)(A): The plan should describe vulnerability in terms of the types and numbers of existing and future buildings, infrastructure, and critical facilities located in the identified hazard areas. Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(ii)(B): [The plan should describe vulnerability in terms of an] estimate of the potential dollar losses to vulnerable structures identified in paragraph (c)(2)(i)(A) of this section and a description of the methodology used to prepare the estimate. Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(ii)(C): [The plan should describe vulnerability in terms of] providing a general description of land uses and development trends within the community so that mitigation options can be considered in future land use decisions. With Sacramento County’s hazards identified and profiled, the HMPC conducted a vulnerability assessment to describe the impact that each hazard would have on the Sacramento County Planning Area. The vulnerability assessment quantifies, to the extent feasible using best available data, assets at risk to natural hazards and estimates potential losses. This section focuses on the risks to the County as a whole. Data from the individual participating jurisdictions was also evaluated and is integrated here and in the jurisdictional annexes, and noted where the risk differs for a particular jurisdiction within the Planning Area.
    [Show full text]