DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Development Framework Allocations D.P.D Landscape and Settlement Character Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Development Framework Allocations D.P.D Landscape and Settlement Character Assessment LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK ALLOCATIONS D.P.D LANDSCAPE AND SETTLEMENT CHARACTER ASSESSMENT For Northallerton Thirsk Bedale & Aiskew Easingwold Stokesley HAMBLETON DISTRICT COUNCIL Local Development Framework - Allocations DPD CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................5 1.1 Terms of Commission ...........................................................................................................5 1.2 Landcare ..................................................................................................................................5 1.3 The Partners............................................................................................................................5 2. METHODOLOGY...............................................................................................................................6 2.1 Intentions of the study ..........................................................................................................6 2.2 Methodology Adopted...........................................................................................................6 2.3 Visual Impact Assessment of Existing Settlements and Proposed Developments on local landscape.................................................................................................................7 2.4 The Visual Envelope ..............................................................................................................8 2.5 Ranking of Impact ..................................................................................................................8 3. GENERAL MITIGATION & MASTERPLANNING ........................................................................11 3.2 Masterplanning.....................................................................................................................11 3.3 Siting and Development Layout ........................................................................................11 3.4 Colour, Tone and Texture...................................................................................................12 3.5 Landscape Planting and Ground Modelling....................................................................13 4. LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ..........................................................................................................15 4.4 Mitigation common to all landscape character types....................................................15 4.5 Key Characteristics of Landscape types found immediately surrounding proposed development options of the five settlements extracted from the study:.15 5. NORTHALLERTON.........................................................................................................................24 5.1 Landscape Setting ...............................................................................................................24 5.2 South Sector .........................................................................................................................24 Existing Settlement......................................................................................................24 Development Options Impact......................................................................................24 Mitigation .....................................................................................................................25 5.3 South West Sector ...............................................................................................................25 Existing Settlement......................................................................................................25 Development Options Impact......................................................................................26 Mitigation .....................................................................................................................26 LANDCARE December 2008 Page |1 HAMBLETON DISTRICT COUNCIL Local Development Framework - Allocations DPD 5.4 West Sector...........................................................................................................................27 Existing Settlement......................................................................................................27 Development Options Impact......................................................................................27 Mitigation .....................................................................................................................28 5.5 North Sector..........................................................................................................................28 Existing Settlement......................................................................................................28 Development Options Impact......................................................................................29 Mitigation .....................................................................................................................30 5.6 East Sector ............................................................................................................................30 Existing Settlement......................................................................................................30 Development Options Impact......................................................................................31 Mitigation .....................................................................................................................32 6. THIRSK.............................................................................................................................................33 6.1 Landscape Setting ...............................................................................................................33 6.2 South West Sector ...............................................................................................................33 FROM SOUTH ............................................................................................................33 Existing Settlement......................................................................................................33 Development Options Impact......................................................................................34 Mitigation .....................................................................................................................34 FROM NORTH ............................................................................................................35 Existing Settlement......................................................................................................35 Development Options Impact......................................................................................35 Mitigation .....................................................................................................................36 6.3 North West Sector................................................................................................................36 Existing Settlement......................................................................................................36 Development Options Impact......................................................................................37 Mitigation .....................................................................................................................37 6.4 North East Sector.................................................................................................................38 Existing Settlement......................................................................................................38 Development Options Impact......................................................................................38 Mitigation .....................................................................................................................39 6.5 South East Sector ................................................................................................................39 Existing Settlement......................................................................................................39 Development Options Impact......................................................................................40 Mitigation .....................................................................................................................40 7. BEDALE & AISKEW .......................................................................................................................42 7.1 Landscape Setting ...............................................................................................................42 7.2 Aiskew East...........................................................................................................................42 Existing Settlement......................................................................................................42 Development Options Impact......................................................................................43 Mitigation .....................................................................................................................43 7.3 Aiskew North Sector............................................................................................................43 Existing Settlement......................................................................................................43
Load more

Recommended publications
  • For Sale Historic Dales Farmhouse £595000 East
    1 of 7 for East Rackenthwaite For Property Sales, Rental and Management Professionals in Sedbergh, Western Yorkshire Dales and East Cumbria Lakes at: 59 Main Street, Sedbergh, Cumbria, LA10 5AB Tel: +44 (0)15396 21000 Fax: +44 (0)15396 21710 Sale www.cobblecountry.co.uk [email protected] Historic Dales Farmhouse £595,000 East Rackenthwaite, Garsdale Sedbergh Cumbria LA10 5PD Near Sedbergh and in the Yorkshire Dales National Park area of Garsdale, lies this fine example of a former Yorkshire Dales traditional Farmhouse with adjoining barn converted into accommodation. Restored some twenty years ago, the features with this property both inside and structurally are some of the finest in the area. Huge chimneys represent the top of a magnificent fireplace in the entrance lounge. Oak panels, beams and wooden flooring all play their part throughout the house in offering a truly comfortable home with modern quality renovations. A red Rayburn offers heating for kitchen and cooking. Central heating by oil. 4 bedrooms, bathroom, gamesroom, Lounge, sitting room, and study area as well as integral store and garage. Set up away from the road on a South facing hillside, this enjoys views over front gardens to neighbouring fields in the valley. Nigel Close Ltd. Registered in England & Wales. Registered Number:1908404 Registered Office: 59 Main Street, Sedbergh, Cumbria, LA10 5AB All permits to view and particulars are issued on the distinct understanding that negotiations are conducted through the agency of Cobble Country Property. Properties by private treaty are offered subject to contract. No responsibility can be accepted for loss or expense incurred in viewing or in the event of any property being sold, let or withdrawn.
    [Show full text]
  • North Yorkshire County Council's A684 Bedale, Aiskew and Leeming
    Report to the Secretary of State for Transport by I Jenkins BSc CEng MICE MCIWEM an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Transport Date: 5 July 2013 HIGHWAYS ACT 1980 ACQUISITION OF LAND ACT 1981 THE NORTH YORKSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL A684 BEDALE, AISKEW AND LEEMING BAR BYPASS COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDER 2012 THE NORTH YORKSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL (A684 BEDALE, AISKEW AND LEEMING BAR BYPASS CLASSIFIED ROAD)(SIDE ROADS) ORDER 2012 Date of Inquiries: 21, 22 and 23 May 2013. Ref: DPI/P2745/13/6. Page 1 of 47 TABLE OF CONTENTS CASE DETAILS......................................................................................................................................................... 3 1 PREAMBLE....................................................................................................................................................... 3 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE AND ITS SURROUNDINGS...................................................................... 5 3 PROCEDURAL/LEGAL SUBMISSIONS ...................................................................................................... 5 4 THE CASE FOR NORTH YORKSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL ................................................................. 7 5 THE CASES FOR THE OBJECTORS ......................................................................................................... 18 6 REBUTTAL BY NORTH YORKSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL ................................................................ 23 7 INSPECTOR’S CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BRI 51 1 Shorter-Contributions 307..387
    318 SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS An Early Roman Fort at Thirkleby, North Yorkshire By MARTIN MILLETT and RICHARD BRICKSTOCK ABSTRACT This paper reports the discovery through aerial photography of a Roman fort at Thirkleby, near Thirsk in North Yorkshire. It appears to have two structural phases, and surface finds indicate that it dates from the Flavian period. The significance of its location on the intersection of routes north–south along the edge of the Vale of York and east–west connecting Malton and Aldborough is discussed in the context of Roman annexation of the North. Keywords: Thirkleby; Roman fort; Roman roads; Yorkshire INTRODUCTION The unusually dry conditions in northern England in the summer of 2018 produced a substantial crop of new sites discovered through aerial photography. By chance, the Google Earth satellite image coverage for parts of Yorkshire has been updated with a set of images taken on 1 July 2018, during the drought. Amongst the numerous sites revealed in this imagery – often in areas where crop-marks are rarely visible – is a previously unknown Roman fort (FIG.1).1 The site (SE 4718 7728) lies just to the west of the modern A19, on the southern side of the Thirkleby beck at its confluence with the Carr Dike stream, about 6 km south-east of Thirsk. It is situated on level ground at a height of about 32 m above sea level on the southern edge of the flood plain of the beck, which is clearly visible on the aerial images. A further narrow relict stream bed runs beside it to the south-east.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire GREEN Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study
    Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Yorkshire GREEN Project Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study (YG-NSC-00001) National Grid National Grid House Warwick Technology Park Gallows Hill Warwick CV34 6DA Final - March 2021 Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Page intentionally blank Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Document Control Document Properties Organisation AECOM Ltd Author Alison Williams Approved by Michael Williams Title Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Document Reference YG-NSC-00001 Version History Date Version Status Description/Changes 02 March 2021 V8 Final version Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Page intentionally blank Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Overview and Purpose 1 1.2 Background and Need 3 1.3 Description of the Project 3 1.4 Structure of this Report 7 1.5 The Project Team 7 2. APPROACH TO ROUTEING AND SITING 8 2.1 Overview of National Grid’s Approach 8 2.2 Route and Site Selection Process 11 2.3 Overview of Stages of Development 11 3. THE STUDY AREA 16 3.1 Introduction 16 3.2 York North Study Area 16 3.3 Tadcaster Study Area 17 3.4 Monk Fryston Study Area 17 4. YORK NORTH OPTIONS APPRAISAL 19 4.1 Approach to Appraisal 19 4.2 CSEC Siting Area Identification 19 4.3 Substation Siting Area Identification 19 4.4 Overhead Line Routeing Identification 20 4.5 Combination Options 20 4.6 Screening of York North Options 24 4.7 Options Appraisal Summary of Remaining York North Options 28 4.8 The Holford Rules and Horlock Rules 76 4.9 York North Preferred Option 76 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Written Description of the Boundary Relating to the Yorkshire Dales National Park
    Written Description of the Boundary relating to the Yorkshire Dales National Park (Designation) (Variation) Confirmation Order 2015 Introduction This description is designed to be read in conjunction with the 1:25,000 scale maps included within the Yorkshire Dales National Park (Designation) (Variation) Confirmation Order 2015 as confirmed by the Secretary of State on 23rd day of October 2015. It does not form part of the Order but is intended to assist interpretation of the map against features on the ground. Map references in italics refer to the map numbers in the top right corner of the maps bound in with the Order. Map references within the text e.g. SD655749 are six figure Ordnance Survey Grid References. The description of the boundary proceeds round the area of the boundary variations in a clockwise direction (in line with the direction of the text in the original boundary description which accompanied the 1953 Yorkshire Dales National Park Designation Order), from the point at which it deviates from the original boundary, to the point at which it re-joins it. In line with the description of the 1953 boundary, and unless otherwise stated: where the boundary follows roads and tracks, it follows the edge of the metalled surface of the road and the edge of the track, excluding the roads and tracks themselves (there are some exceptions, as stated below); and in the case of water courses, if it is not stated whether the boundary follows the edge or the centre, the boundary follows the centre of the water course (although in this description the edge of water courses is generally stated).
    [Show full text]
  • Third Local Transport Strategy 2011 to 2021
    Keep Tyne and Wear Moving LTP3: The Third Local Transport Plan for Tyne and Wear Strategy 2011 - 2021 March 2011 Contents Foreword by the Chair of the ITA 2 Executive Summary Executive Summary i Part 1: Introduction and background Chapter 1 Introduction 2 1.1 About this document 2 1.2 Role of the Local Transport Plan 3 1.3 Building on the achievements of LTP2 3 1.4 Review of document 5 Chapter 2 Statutory assessments of the LTP 8 2.1 Introduction 8 2.2 Strategic Environmental Assessment 8 2.3 Health Impact Assessment 8 2.4 Equality Impact Assessment 9 2.5 Habitats Regulation Assessment 9 Chapter 3 Changes from Draft to Final 12 3.1 Listening to transport users 12 3.2 Summary of responses 13 3.3 Summary of changes 15 Chapter 4 Context 22 4.1 Policy context 22 4.2 Transport geography of Tyne and Wear 27 4.2.1 Overview 27 4.2.2 Tyne and Wear's transport network 30 4.3 Socio-economic background 41 4.4 Sustainability Baseline and Key Issues 47 4.5 Trends and forecasts 49 Part 2: Objectives, key issues and challenges Chapter 5 The Vision 56 Chapter 6 Supporting economic development and regeneration 59 6.1 Regeneration goals 59 Tyne and Wear Local Transport Plan 3 Strategy 2011-21 Contents 6.2 Reduce the gap between Tyne and Wear's economic growth rate and other English regions 61 6.3 Reliability and predictability of journey times 61 6.4 Connectivity and access to labour markets 62 6.5 Housing provision 64 6.6 Resilience 64 Chapter 7 Addressing climate change 67 7.1 Introduction 67 7.2 Targets 69 7.3 Forecasts for Tyne and Wear 72 7.4 Meeting
    [Show full text]
  • Full Edition
    THE UPPER WENSLEYDALE NEWSLETTER Issue 229 October 2016 Donation please: 30p suggested or more if you wish Covering Upper Wensleydale from Wensley to Garsdale Head, with Walden and Bishopdale, Swaledale from Keld to Gunnerside plus Cowgill in Upper Dentdale. Published by Upper Wensleydale The Upper Wensleydale Newsletter Newsletter Burnside Coach House, Burtersett Road, Hawes DL8 3NT Tel: 667785 Issue 229 October 2016 Email for submission of articles, what’s ons, letters etc.:[email protected] Features Competition 4 Newsletters on the Web, simply enter ____________________________ “Upper Wensleydale Newsletter” or Swaledale Mountain Rescue 12 ‘‘Welcome to Wensleydale’ Archive copies back to 1995 are in the Dales ________________ ____________ Countryside Museum resources room. Wensleydale Wheels 7 ____________________________ Committee: Alan S.Watkinson, A684 9 and 10 Malcolm Carruthers, ____________________________ Barry Cruickshanks (Web), Police Report 18 Sue E .Duffield, Karen Jones, ____________________________ Alastair Macintosh, Neil Piper, Karen Prudden Doctor’s Rotas 17 Janet W. Thomson (Treasurer), ____________________________ Peter Wood Message from Spain 16 Final processing: ___________________________ Sarah Champion, Adrian Janke. Jane Ritchie 21 Postal distribution: Derek Stephens ____________________________ What’s On 13 ________________________ PLEASE NOTE Plus all the regulars This web-copy does not contain the commercial adverts which are in the full Newsletter. Whilst we try to ensure that all information is As a general rule we only accept adverts from correct we cannot be held legally responsible within the circulation area and no more than for omissions or inaccuracies in articles, one-third of each issue is taken up with them. adverts or listings, or for any inconvenience caused. Views expressed in articles are the - Advertising sole responsibility of the person by lined.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Common Ground Natural England
    A19 / A184 Testo’s Junction Improvement TR010020 7.7(1) Statement of Common Ground Natural England Planning Act 2008 Rule 8(1)(e) Infrastructure Planning (Examination Procedure) Rules 2010 Volume 7 March 2018 A19 / A184 Testo’s Junction Improvement Statement of Common Ground – Natural England Infrastructure Planning Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Examination Procedure) Rules 2010 A19 / A184 TESTO’S JUNCTION IMPROVEMENT The A19 / A184 (Testo’s Junction Improvement) Development Consent Order 201[ ] ______________________________________________ Statement of Common Ground – Natural England ______________________________________________ Regulation Number: Rule 8(1)(e) Planning Inspectorate Scheme TR010020 Reference Application Document Reference TR010020/APP/7.7(1) Author: A19 Project Team, Highways England & Jacobs Version Date Status of Version Rev 1 March 2018 Updated for Examination Deadline 5 Rev 0 November 2017 Submitted for Examination Deadline 1 Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010020 Application Document Ref: TR010020/APP/7.7(1) (Volume 7) A19 / A184 Testo’s Junction Improvement Statement of Common Ground – Natural England Page Left Intentionally Blank Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010020 Application Document Ref: TR010020/APP/7.7(1) (Volume 7) A19 / A184 Testos Junction Improvement Development Consent Order Planning Inspectorate Reference: TR010020 Statement of Common Ground Between HIGHWAYS ENGLAND and NATURAL ENGLAND Document control Document properties Parties Highways England and Natural England Author
    [Show full text]
  • Askrigg Walk 12.Indd
    Walk 12 Mossdale and Cotterdale Distance - 8 miles Map: O.S. Outdoor Leisure 30 - Walk - A684 Disclaimer: This route was correct at time of writing. However, alterations can happen if development or boundary changes occur, and there is no guarantee of permanent access. These walks have been published for use by site visitors on the understanding that neither HPB Management Limited nor any other person connected with Holiday Property Bond is responsible for the safety or wellbeing of those following the routes as described. It is walkers’ own responsibility to be adequately prepared and equipped for the level of walk and the weather conditions and to assess the safety and accessibility of the walk. Walk 12 Mossdale and Cotterdale Distance - 8 miles Map: O.S. Outdoor Leisure 19 There are several hamlets in Wensleydale with names right. Descend into a small copse and cross a stream, then swing seeking a stile located where the wall and a wire fence meet. ending - Sett. Appersett, Burtersett, Countersett and left towards a gate situated alongside a barn. Cross the next Follow a beckside path towards the houses (no M&S or Tesco Marsett being examples. The derivation comes from the field aiming for a gate in the far right corner. Turn left along the hereabouts!) Turn right. farm access road. Norse saetr, which roughly translated means settlement. The hamlet, formerly known as Cotter Town originally When the road swings (right) towards the farmhouse (Birk housed a mining community. In those times there were This outing commences from Appersett, a small hamlet Rigg farm), veer left and pass through a gate.
    [Show full text]
  • Research on Weather Conditions and Their Relationship to Crashes December 31, 2020 6
    INVESTIGATION OF WEATHER CONDITIONS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO CRASHES 1 Dr. Mark Anderson 2 Dr. Aemal J. Khattak 2 Muhammad Umer Farooq 1 John Cecava 3 Curtis Walker 1. Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences 2. Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln, NE 68583-0851 3. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO Sponsored by Nebraska Department of Transportation and U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration December 31, 2020 TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. SPR-21 (20) M097 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Research on Weather conditions and their relationship to crashes December 31, 2020 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Dr. Mark Anderson, Dr. Aemal J. Khattak, Muhammad Umer Farooq, John 26-0514-0202-001 Cecava, Dr. Curtis Walker 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2200 Vine Street, PO Box 830851 11. Contract or Grant No. Lincoln, NE 68583-0851 SPR-21 (20) M097 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Nebraska Department of Transportation NDOT Final Report 1500 Nebraska 2 Lincoln, NE 68502 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract The objectives of the research were to conduct a seasonal investigation of when winter weather conditions are a factor in crashes reported in Nebraska, to perform statistical analyses on Nebraska crash and meteorological data and identify weather conditions causing the significant safety concerns, and to investigate whether knowing the snowfall amount and/or storm intensity/severity could be a precursor to the number and severity of crashes.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
    The Planning Inspectorate Report to the Secretary of 4/09 Kite Wing Temple Quay House 2 The Square State for Communities and Temple Quay Bristol BS1 6PN 0117 372 6372 Local Government e-mail: enquiries@planning- inspectorate.gsi.gov.uk by D R Cullingford BA MPhil MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Date 2 March 2007 Local Government CITY OF YORK COUNCIL Applications by PERSIMMON HOMES (YORKSHIRE) LIMITED & HOGG BUILDERS (YORK) LIMITED & THE JOSEPH ROWNTREE HOUSING TRUST Inquiry held from 13 June to 24 July 2006 Formal site visits undertaken on 25 & 28 July 2006 with additional visits on 30 & 31 August and 19-21 September 2006 Land at Germany Beck, east of Fordlands Road, Fulford, York, & Land west of Metcalfe Lane, Osbaldwick, York File References: APP/C2741/V/05/1189897 & YH 5343/310/2 APP/C2741/V/05/1189885 & YH 5343/310/1 Report: APP/C2741/V/05/1189897 & APP/C2741/V/05/1189885 CONTENTS 1. PROCEDURAL MATTERS ............................................................................................................................................ 3 THE SCHEMES IN OUTLINE; AGREEMENTS AND CONDITIONS...................................................................................................... 4 THE PRE INQUIRY MEETING...................................................................................................................................................... 6 The state of planning policy in York...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phase I Geo-Environmental Assessment
    Phase I Geo-Environmental Assessment Caw Ingredients, Leeming Bar Business Park October 2018 Cawingredients Ltd. Reference: 181005.R.001 Phase I Geo- Environmental Assessment Caw Ingredients, Leeming Bar Business Park Client: Cawingredients Ltd. Author: Reference: 181005.R.001 Name Eleanor Curry BSc (Hons) Status: Version 2.0 Signature Date: October 2018 Position Consultant Issued by: Roberts Environmental Ltd 23 Grey Street Newcastle upon Tyne Checked / Approved by: NE1 6EE Name Jeff Roberts BSc(Hons) MSc MIEnvSc CEnv Signature Telephone: 0191 230 4521 Position Director [email protected] www.robertsenvironmental.co.uk This report has been prepared by Roberts Environmental, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the client, incorporation of our General Terms and Condition of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to us by agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies on the report at its own risk. Contents 1. INSTRUCTIONS .................................................................................................................... 1 2. LOCATION .......................................................................................................................... 2 4. OPERATIONAL
    [Show full text]