DOCSLIB.ORG

Genome Integrity and Transmission Gene Expression

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Genome Integrity and Transmission Gene Expression Vol. 180 No. 4 December 2008 PERSPECTIVES DENELL, ROB, Establishment of Tribolium as a genetic model system and its early contributions to evo-devo .......................................................................................................................................................... 1779—1786 REVIEW DRUMMOND-BARBOSA, DANIELA, Stem cells, their niches and the systemic environment: An aging network .......................................................................................................................................................... 1787—1797 INVESTIGATIONS Genome integrity and transmission REID, ROBERT J. D., IVANA SUNJEVARIC, WARREN P. VOTH, SAMANTHA CICCONE, WENDY DU, AILEEN E. OLSEN, DAVID J. STILLMAN AND RODNEY ROTHSTEIN, Chromosome-scale genetic mapping using a set of 16 conditionally stable Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosomes .................................................................................. 1799—1808 PALMBOS, PHILLIP L., DONGLIANG WU, JAMES M. DALEY AND THOMAS E. WILSON, Recruitment of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Dnl4–Lif1 complex to a double-strand break requires interactions with Yku80 and the Xrs2 FHA domain............................................................................................................................................. 1809—1819 TITEN, SIMON W. A., AND KENT G. GOLIC, Telomere loss provokes multiple pathways to apoptosis and produces genomic instability in Drosophila melanogaster................................................................................ 1821—1832 MCCUNE, HEATHER J., LAURA S. DANIELSON, GINA M. ALVINO, DAVID COLLINGWOOD, JEFFREY J. DELROW, WALTON L. FANGMAN, BONITA J. BREWER AND M. K. RAGHURAMAN, The temporal program of chromosome replication: Genomewide replication in Clb5⌬ Saccharomyces cerevisiae............................................................ 1833—1847 HOWELL, ELAINE C., MICHAEL J. KEARSEY, GARETH H. JONES, GRAHAM J. KING AND SUSAN J. ARMSTRONG, A and C genome distinction and chromosome identification in Brassica napus by sequential fluorescence in situ hybridization and genomic in situ hybridization.......................................................................... 1849—1857 PARVANOV, EMIL, JUERG KOHLI AND KATJA LUDIN, The mating-type-related bias of gene conversion in Schizosaccharomyces pombe ................................................................................................................. 1859—1868 RONG, YIKANG S., Loss of the histone variant H2A.Z restores capping to checkpoint-defective telomeres in Drosophila ....................................................................................................................................... 1869—1875 REDMAN, ELIZABETH, VICTORIA GRILLO, GARY SAUNDERS, ERICA PACKARD, FRANK JACKSON, MATT BERRIMAN AND JOHN STUART GILLEARD, Genetics of mating and sex determination in the parasitic nematode Haemonchus contortus............................................................................................................................................ 1877—1887 ACHARYA, SONIA N., ALEXANDER M. MANY, ANDREW P. S CHROEDER, FELICIA M. KENNEDY, OLEKSANDR P. S AVYTSKYY, JENNIFER T. G RUBB, JACK A. VINCENT, ELIZABETH A. FRIEDLE, MARTINA CELERIN, DANIEL S. MAILLET, HEATHER J. PALMERINI, MEGAN A. GREISCHAR, GABRIEL MONCALIAN, R. SCOTT WILLIAMS, JOHN A. TAINER AND MIRIAM E. ZOLAN, Coprinus cinereus rad50 mutants reveal an essential structural role for Rad50 in axial element and synaptonemal complex formation, homolog pairing and meiotic recombination ................... 1889—1907 Gene expression KANG, HYUN MIN, CHUN YE AND ELEAZAR ESKIN, Accurate discovery of expression quantitative trait loci under confounding from spurious and genuine regulatory hotspots ................................................... 1909—1925 YAMASAKI, TOMOHITO, HITOSHI MIYASAKA AND TAKESHI OHAMA, Unstable RNAi effects through epigenetic silencing of an inverted repeat transgene in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii ..................................... 1927—1944 WANG, XIAOGANG, HAIMING XU, DONGHONG JU AND YOUMING XIE, Disruption of Rpn4-induced proteasome expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reduces cell viability under stressed conditions............... 1945—1953 WANG, CHIA-LIN, JOSEPH LANDRY AND ROLF STERNGLANZ, A yeast Sir2 mutant temperature sensitive for silencing .......................................................................................................................................................... 1955—1962 SIERA, SCOTT G., AND THOMAS W. CLINE, Sexual back talk with evolutionary implications: Stimulation of the Drosophila sex-determination gene Sex-lethal by its target transformer ........................................ 1963—1981 SIDORENKO, LYUDMILA, AND VICKI CHANDLER, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase is required for enhancer- mediated transcriptional silencing associated with paramutation at the maize p1 gene .......... 1983—1993 FUTAHASHI, RYO, JOTARO SATO, YAN MENG, SHUN OKAMOTO, TAKAAKI DAIMON, KIMIKO YAMAMOTO, YOSHITAKA SUETSUGU, JUNKO NARUKAWA, HIROKAZU TAKAHASHI, YUTAKA BANNO, SUSUMU KATSUMA, TORU SHIMADA, KAZUEI MITA AND HARUHIKO FUJIWARA, yellow and ebony are the responsible genes for the larval color mutants of the silkworm Bombyx mori ...................................................................................................................... 1995—2005 SPITZNER, ANDREA, ANGELIKA F. PERZLMAIER, KERSTIN E. GEILLINGER, PETRA REIHL AND JÜRGEN STOLZ, The proline- dependent transcription factor Put3 regulates the expression of the riboflavin transporter MCH5 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae ..................................................................................................................... 2007—2017 Cellular genetics STRADER, LUCIA C., MELANIE MONROE-AUGUSTUS, KRISTEN C. ROGERS, GRACE L. LIN AND BONNIE BARTEL, Arabidopsis iba response5 suppressors separate responses to various hormones......................... 2019—2031 MEEDNU, NIDA, HAROLD HOOPS, SONIA D’SILVA, LEAH POGORZALA, SCHUYLER WOOD, DAVID FARKAS, MARK SORRENTINO, ELAINE SIA, PAM MELUH AND RITA K. MILLER, The spindle positioning protein Kar9p interacts with the sumoylation machinery in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.................................................................. 2033—2055 FRANCISCOVICH, A. L., A. D. VRAILAS MORTIMER, A. A. FREEMAN, J. GU AND S. SANYAL, Overexpression screen in Drosophila identifies neuronal roles of GSK-3␤/shaggy as a regulator of AP-1-dependent developmental plasticity ........................................................................................................................................... 2057—2071 BALESTRA, FERNANDO R., AND JUAN JIMENEZ, A G2-phase microtubule-damage response in fission yeast .......................................................................................................................................................... 2073—2080 BLACHON, STEPHANIE, JAYACHANDRAN GOPALAKRISHNAN, YOSHIHIRO OMORI, ANDREY POLYANOVSKY, ALLEN CHURCH, DANIELA NICASTRO, JAREMA MALICKI AND TOMER AVIDOR-REISS, Drosophila asterless and vertebrate Cep152 are orthologs essential for centriole duplication................................................................................ 2081—2094 Developmental and behavioral genetics MELICHAREK, DAVID, ARPIT SHAH, GINNENE DISTEFANO, ANDREW J. GANGEMI, ANDREW ORAPALLO, ALYSIA D. VRAILAS-MORTIMER AND DANIEL R. MARENDA, Identification of novel regulators of atonal expression in the developing Drosophila retina ........................................................................................................ 2095—2110 KLEEMANN, GUNNAR, LINGYUN JIA AND SCOTT W. EMMONS, Regulation of Caenorhabditis elegans male mate search- ing behavior by the nuclear receptor DAF-12 .............................................................................. 2111—2122 JIN, ZHIGANG, ELLEN HOMOLA, STANLEY TIONG AND SHELAGH D. CAMPBELL, Drosophila Myt1 is the major Cdk1 inhibitory kinase for wing imaginal disc development ................................................................ 2123—2133 Population and evolutionary genetics MARTIN, GUILLAUME, ELODIE CHAPUIS AND JÉROˆ ME GOUDET, Multivariate Q st–Fst comparisons: A neutrality test for the evolution of the G matrix in structured populations ...................................................... 2135—2149 CHAPUIS, ELODIE, GUILLAUME MARTIN AND JÉROˆ ME GOUDET, Effects of selection and drift on G matrix evolution in a heterogeneous environment: A multivariate Q st–Fst test with the freshwater snail Galba truncatula .......................................................................................................................................................... 2151—2161 FOGLE, CRAIG A., JAMES L. NAGLE AND MICHAEL M. DESAI, Clonal interference, multiple mutations and adap- tation in large asexual populations ............................................................................................... 2163—2173 DESAI, MICHAEL M., AND JOSHUA B. PLOTKIN, The polymorphism frequency spectrum of finitely many sites under selection................................................................................................................................ 2175—2191 HANDEL, ANDREAS, AND MATTHEW R. BENNETT, Surviving the bottleneck: Transmission mutants and the evolu- tion of microbial populations ........................................................................................................ 2193—2200 Genetics of complex traits
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Atrec8 and Atscc3 Are Essential to the Monopolar Orientation of the Kinetochores During Meiosis
    Research Article 4621 AtREC8 and AtSCC3 are essential to the monopolar orientation of the kinetochores during meiosis Liudmila Chelysheva, Stéphanie Diallo*, Daniel Vezon, Ghislaine Gendrot, Nathalie Vrielynck, Katia Belcram, Nathalie Rocques, Angustias Márquez-Lema‡, Anuj M. Bhatt§, Christine Horlow, Raphaël Mercier, Christine Mézard and Mathilde Grelon¶ Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, Station de Génétique et d’Amélioration des Plantes, INRA de Versailles, Route de Saint-Cyr, 78026 Versailles CEDEX, France *Present address: Laboratoire de Microbiologie du Froid UPRES 2123, 55 Rue Saint-Germain, 27000 Evreux, France ‡Present address: Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible (CSIC), Apartado 4084, E-14080, Córdoba, Spain §Present address: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3RB, UK ¶Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Accepted 13 July 2005 Journal of Cell Science 118, 4621-4632 Published by The Company of Biologists 2005 doi:10.1242/jcs.02583 Summary The success of the first meiotic division relies (among other in meiotic nuclei as early as interphase, and bound to the factors) on the formation of bivalents between homologous chromosome axis from early leptotene through to anaphase chromosomes, the monopolar orientation of the sister I. We show here that both AtREC8 and AtSCC3 are kinetochores at metaphase I and the maintenance of necessary not only to maintain centromere cohesion at centromeric cohesion until the onset of anaphase II. The anaphase I, but also for the monopolar orientation of the meiotic cohesin subunit, Rec8 has been reported to be one kinetochores during the first meiotic division. We also of the key players in these processes, but its precise role in found that AtREC8 is involved in chromosome axis kinetochore orientation is still under debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Devic Cv.Pdf
    Devic Martine Date of birth : 7/10/1956 Marital status : Married Directeur de Recherche CNRS – Co-Director of Epigenetic Regulations and Seed Development group ERL 5300 CNRS-IRD Centre IRD 911, Av Agropolis BP 64501 34394 Montpellier Cedex 5 France Phone 33 (0)4-67-41-62-63 Fax 33 (0)4-67-41-62-22 e-mail : [email protected] http://www.mpl.ird.fr/apomixis/Seed_Development.htm http://www.diade-research.fr/pages/equipes-de-recherche/redg-1.html Cursus PhD in Plant Physiology, 1983. "Chlorophyll-protein complexes : biogenesis during chloroplast development in Euglena gracilis Z." Supervisors : Dr. Henri Duranton and Dr. Rodolphe Schantz Institut de Botanique, Laboratoire de Physiologie Végétale, Strasbourg. Posdoctoral experience - 1983-1984 Dr. Marvin Edelman, Genetic Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, ISRAEL. "Expression of two chloroplast genes in Spirodela grown under various physiological conditions." - 1984-1986 Prof. Pierre Chambon, Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire des Eucaryotes, Strasbourg,FRANCE. "Characterisation of the human glucocorticoid receptor." - 1986-1990 Dr. David Baulcombe - 1986-1988 Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge, UK. - 1989-1990 Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich, UK. "Study of different isolates of cucumber mosaic virus satellite RNA. - Since 1991 CNRS Researcher in the Laboratory Genome and Plant Development, FRANCE. “Genetic analysis of seed development in Arabidopsis” - 2009-2011 Re-location of Seed Development Group to IRD Montpellier - 2011 Creation of the team REGD (Epigenetic Regulations and Seed Development) Research interests Developmental regulation of seed maturation phase Genetic and epigenetic regulation of gene expression Cellular biology and imaging Recent publications (1) A network of local and redundant gene regulation governs Arabidopsis seed maturation.
    [Show full text]
  • Arabidopsis in Planta Transformation. Uses, Mechanisms, and Prospects for Transformation of Other Species1
    Update on Plant Transformation Arabidopsis in Planta Transformation. Uses, Mechanisms, and Prospects for Transformation of Other Species1 Andrew F. Bent* Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 The ability to move DNA into an organism and Wright, 1999). Other methods such as electropora- thereby alter its phenotype is central to both basic tion, microinjection, or delivery by virus have also and applied molecular biology. Transformation is a been exploited. To allow physiological selection of simple task with Escherichia coli or Saccharomyces cer- cells that have been successfully transformed, the evisiae, but is usually more difficult with multicellular DNA of interest is typically cloned adjacent to DNA eukaryotes and can be particularly challenging with for a selectable marker gene such as nptII (encoding some important plant species. However, for Arabi- kanamycin antibiotic resistance). dopsis, in planta transformation methods have been Genetic transformation can be transient or stable, developed that are incredibly simple. Attempts to and transformed cells may or may not give rise to apply in planta transformation methods to other gametes that pass genetic material on to subsequent plant species have often failed. This may be due in generations. Transformation of protoplasts, callus part to a poor understanding of the mechanisms that culture cells, or other isolated plant cells is usually underlie the successful Arabidopsis transformation straightforward and can be used for short-term stud- method. Studies of Arabidopsis transformation have ies of gene function (Gelvin and Schilperoort, 1998). accordingly been pursued, and three groups have Transformation of leaf mesophyll cells or other cells recently published relevant findings.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Gametophytic Mutations Affecting Pollen Development and Pollen Tube Growth in Arabidopsis Thaliana
    Copyright 2001 by the Genetics Society of America Five Gametophytic Mutations Affecting Pollen Development and Pollen Tube Growth in Arabidopsis thaliana Antonia Procissi,1 Solveig de Laissardie`re, Madina Fe´rault, Daniel Vezon, Georges Pelletier and Sandrine Bonhomme INRA Station de Ge´ne´tique et d’Ame´lioration des Plantes, Centre de Versailles-Grignon, 78026 Versailles Cedex, France Manuscript received October 31, 2000 Accepted for publication May 30, 2001 ABSTRACT Mutant analysis represents one of the most reliable approaches to identifying genes involved in plant development. The screening of the Versailles collection of Arabidopsis thaliana T-DNA insertion trans- formants has allowed us to isolate different mutations affecting male gametophytic functions and viability. Among several mutated lines, five have been extensively studied at the genetic, molecular, and cytological levels. For each mutant, several generations of selfing and outcrossing have been carried out, leading to the conclusion that all these mutations are tagged and affect only the male gametophyte. However, only one out of the five mutations is completely penetrant. A variable number of T-DNA copies has integrated in the mutant lines, although all segregate at one mutated locus. Two mutants could be defined as “early mutants”: the mutated genes are presumably expressed during pollen grain maturation and their alteration leads to the production of nonfunctional pollen grains. Two other mutants could be defined as “late mutant” since their pollen is able to germinate but pollen tube growth is highly disturbed. Screening for segregation ratio distortions followed by thorough genetic analysis proved to be a powerful tool for identifying gametophytic mutations of all phases of pollen development.
    [Show full text]
  • Protein Import Into Chloroplasts. an Outline of Early Events in The
    Plant Mitochondria With Emphasis on RNA Editing and Cytoplasmic Male Sterility Edited by A. Brennicke and U. Kiick Weinheim · New York VCH Basel · Cambridge · Tokyo 1993 Contents Introduction Plant Mitochondria 1993 - a personal overview 1 Leslie A. Grivell RNA Editing 1. Transfer RNA Editing in Acanthamoeba castellanii Mitochondria . 15 Michael W. Gray & Kim M. Lonergan 2. RNA Editing in Trypanosoma brucei: gRNA Diversity and Redundancy 23 Kenneth Stuart, Robert A. Corell, Ulrich Göringer, Donna J. Koslowsky, Peter J. Myler, Laurie K. Read, Georg R. Riley, Hsiao-Hsueh Shu & Augustine E. Souza 3. Properties of gRNAs Involved in RNA Editing in Mitochondria of the Insect Trypanosome Crithidia fasciculata 37 Paul Sloof, Gert Jan Arts, Peter Leegwater, Dave Speijer, Janny van den Burg, Annett de Haan & Rob Benne 4. RNA Editing in Mitochondria of Physarum polycephalum 53 Dennis L. Miller, Mei-ling Ling, Siqing Wang, Ning Yang & Heba Costandy 5. RNA Editing in Oenothera Mitochondria 63 Wolfgang Schuster & Axel Brennicke 6. RNA Editing in Petunia Mitochondria 71 Maureen R. Hanson, Claudia A. Sutton, Bingwei Lu, Patricia L. Conklin, Henri Wintz, Robin Wilson & Kim D. Pruitt 7. Of RNA Editing and Cytoplasmic Male Sterility in Plants 83 Alejandro Araya, Dominique Begu, Pierre V Graves, Michael Hernould, Simon Litvak, Armand Mouras & Sony Suharsono 8. RNA Editing in Chloroplasts of Higher Plants 93 Hans Kössel, Brigitte Hoch, Rainer Μ. Maier, Gabor L. Igloi, Jörg Kudla, Patric Zeitz, Regina Freyer, Kai Neckermann & Stephanie Ruf Gene and Genome Organisation 9. Organization and Coding Capacity of Mitochondrial Genomes of Algae 103 Gabriele Wolff & Ulrich Kück 10. Gene Organization and Evolution of Introns of a Liverwort, Marchantia polymorpha, Mitochondrial Genome 115 Kanji Ohyama, Kenji Oda, Eiji Ohta & Miho Takemura 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Evolution of Anisogamy in the Early Diverging Fungus, Allomyces
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/230292; this version posted November 19, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Title Evolution of anisogamy in the early diverging fungus, Allomyces Short Title Allomyces transcriptome Authors Sujal S. Phadke1,a,b, Shawn M. Rupp2,a, Melissa A. Wilson Sayres2,3,4,a,b Affiliations 1. Microbial and Environmental Genomics Group, J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA 2. School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 3. Center for Evolution and Medicine, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 4. Center for Mechanisms of Evolution, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ a. These authors contributed equally to the manuscript. b. Authors to whom correspondence can be directed: SSP: [email protected]; MAWS: [email protected] Data accessibility Raw fastq files from the transcriptomes are available on SRA. SRA accession: SRP128147 Temporary Submission ID: SUB3298207 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/230292; this version posted November 19, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract Gamete size dimorphism between sexes (anisogamy) is predicted to have evolved from an isogamous system in which sexes have equal-sized, monomorphic gametes. Although adaptive explanations for the evolution of anisogamy abound, we lack comparable insights into molecular changes that bring about the transition from monomorphism to dimorphism. The basal fungal clade Allomyces provides unique opportunities to investigate genomic changes that are associated with this transition in closely related species that show either isogamous or anisogamous mating systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Outcrossing As an Explanation of the Apparent Unconventional Genetic Behavior of Arabidopsis Thaliana Hth Mutants
    Copyright Ó 2008 by the Genetics Society of America DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.095208 Note Outcrossing as an Explanation of the Apparent Unconventional Genetic Behavior of Arabidopsis thaliana hth Mutants Raphael Mercier,1 Sylvie Jolivet, Julien Vignard, Ste´phanie Durand, Jan Drouaud, Georges Pelletier and Fabien Nogue´ INRA, UR254, 78026 Versailles Cedex, France Manuscript received August 13, 2008 Accepted for publication October 6, 2008 ABSTRACT The reappearance of HTH alleles in the offspring of homozygous Arabidopsis hth mutants is not consistent with classical Mendelian genetics. It has been suggested that stored RNA may be used to restore genetic information. However, Peng et al. reported that hth mutants tend to display outcrossing and suggested that outcrossing might provide an alternative explanation for the apparent genetic instability. We have confirmed and extended these results, corroborating that the apparent non-Mendelian behavior of hth mutants can be explained by their susceptibility to outcrossing. N Arabidopsis, the reappearance of HTH (HOT- possible, could not be the sole source of ‘‘reversion’’ I HEAD) alleles from the grandparents in the offspring (Lolle et al. 2006), leaving open the debate whether of homozygous hth mutants reported by Lolle et al. hothead is a true genetic outlaw (Pennisi 2006; (2005) is not consistent with classical Mendelian genetics. Gawrylewski 2008). Several explanations have been put forward to explain To measure the level of outcrossing in hth mutant this unexpected reversion of single nucleotide poly- compared to wild type, we grew each of them next to morphisms. Lolle et al. (2005) suggested that RNAs (10 cm) a plant homozygote for a transgene conferring synthesized by the parent may be stored in plants of resistance to hygromycine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maternal Chromosome Set Is the Target of the T-DNA in the in Planta Transformation of Arabidopsis Thaliana
    Copyright 2000 by the Genetics Society of America The Maternal Chromosome Set Is the Target of the T-DNA in the in Planta Transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana Nicole Bechtold, BeÂneÂdicte Jaudeau,1 Sylvie Jolivet, Bruno Maba,2 Daniel Vezon, Roger Voisin and Georges Pelletier Unite de GeÂneÂtique et d'AmeÂlioration des Plantes, INRA, 78026 Versailles Cedex, France Manuscript received August 31, 1999 Accepted for publication April 7, 2000 ABSTRACT In planta transformation methods are now commonly used to transform Arabidopsis thaliana by Agrobacter- ium tumefaciens. The origin of transformants obtained by these methods has been studied by inoculating different ¯oral stages and examining gametophytic expression of an introduced ␤-glucuronidase marker gene encoding GUS. We observed that transformation can still occur after treating ¯owers where embryo sacs have reached the stage of the third division. No GUS expression was observed in embryo sacs or pollen of plants in®ltrated with an Agrobacterium strain bearing a GUS gene under the control of a gametophyte-speci®c promoter. To identify the genetic target we used an insertion mutant in which a gene essential for male gametophytic development has been disrupted by a T-DNA bearing a Basta resistance gene (BR). In this mutant the BR marker is transferred to the progeny only by the female gametes. This mutant was retransformed with a hygromycin resistance marker and doubly resistant plants were selected. The study of 193 progeny of these transformants revealed 25 plants in which the two resistance markers were linked in coupling and only one plant where they were linked in repulsion. These results point to the chromosome set of the female gametophyte as the main target for the T-DNA.
    [Show full text]
  • C.V. De Georges Pelletier
    Georges Pelletier Élu Correspondant le 2 avril 1990, puis Membre 30 novembre 2004 dans la section Biologie intégrative Georges Pelletier, né en 1943, est directeur de recherche émérite à l'INRA. Formation et carrière 1967 Ingénieur agronome, Institut national agronomique de Paris 1979 Docteur ès sciences, université Paris XI 1967- Chercheur à l’Institut national de recherche agronomique (INRA) 1991-1999 Directeur de l’unité de génétique et amélioration des plantes de l’INRA à Versailles 2002 Directeur de recherche à l'INRA, classe exceptionnelle Autres fonctions 2001- Président du Comité exécutif programme français de génomique végétale Génoplante (qui associe la recherche publique et des entreprises) Membre de la Société française de génétique Œuvre scientifique Les travaux de Georges Pelletier chez les plantes supérieures ont porté sur la transmission de l’information génétique au cours de processus sexués et parasexués, comme l’androgenèse, l’hybridation somatique ou la transformation génétique. Georges Pelletier a d’abord étudié les facteurs du développement, induit par la culture in vitro d’anthères, d’embryons haploïdes à partir de microspores, chez plusieurs espèces dont le tabac et l’asperge. Ses travaux ont permis de développer chez cette dernière espèce, à sexes séparés, des variétés hybrides entièrement composées de mâles et plus productives. Il a ensuite abordé l’hérédité des génomes cytoplasmiques, plastes et mitochondries, chez les Nicotianées et analysé les échanges d’information génétique au cours de l’hybridation somatique consécutive à la fusion de protoplastes. Il a pu démontrer la formation de nouveaux génomes mitochondriaux qui associent, par recombinaison d’ADN, des caractéristiques des "parents” de cette hybridation.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Mitochondria
    Plant Mitochondria With Emphasis on RNA Editing and Cytoplasmic Male Sterility Edited by A. Brennicke and U. Kiick — w-i-j-w J(r-^y Weinheim • New York VCH ^lT Basel • Cambridge • Tokyo Contents Introduction Plant Mitochondria 1993 - a personal overview 1 Leslie A. Grivell RNA Editing 1. Transfer RNA Editing in Acanthamoeba castellanii Mitochondria ." 15 Michael W. Gray & Kim M. Lonergan 2. RNA Editing in Trypanosoma brucei: gRNA Diversity and Redundancy 23 Kenneth Stuart, Robert A. Corell, Ulrich Goringer, Donna J. Koslowsky, Peter J. Myler, Laurie K. Read, Georg R. Riley, Hsiao-Hsueh Shu & Augustine E. Souza 3. Properties of gRNAs Involved in RNA Editing in Mitochondria of the Insect Trypanosome Crithidiafasciculata 37 Paul Sloof, Gert Jan Arts, Peter Leegwater, Dave Speijer> Janny van den Burg, Annett de Haan & Rob Benne 4. RNA Editing in Mitochondria of Physarum polycephalum 53 Dennis L. Miller, Mei-ling Ling, Siqing Wang, Ning Yang & Heba Costandy 5. RNA Editing in Oenothera Mitochondria 63 Wolfgang Schuster & Axel Brennicke 6. RNA Editing in Petunia Mitochondria 71 Maureen R. Hanson, Claudia A. Sutton, Bingwei Lu, Patricia L. Conklin, Henri Wintz, Robin Wilson & Kim D. Pruitt 7. Of RNA Editing and Cytoplasmic Male Sterility in Plants 83 Alejandro Araya, Dominique Begu, Pierre V Graves, Michael Hernould, Simon Litvak, Armand Mouras & Sony Suharsono 8. RNA Editing in Chloroplasts of Higher Plants 93 Hans Kossel, Brigitte Hoch, Rainer M. Maier, Gabor L. Igloi, Jorg Kudla, Patric Zeltz, Regina Freyer, Kai Neckermann & Stephanie Ruf Gene and Genome Organisation 9. Organization and Coding Capacity of Mitochondrial Genomes of Algae 103 Gabriele Wolff & Ulrich Kiick 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Reproductive Tissues Are the Primary Target of Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation by the Arabidopsis Floral-Dip Method1
    Female Reproductive Tissues Are the Primary Target of Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation by the Arabidopsis Floral-Dip Method1 Christine Desfeux, Steven J. Clough, and Andrew F. Bent2* Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801 The floral-dip method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis allows efficient plant transformation without need for tissue culture. To facilitate use with other plant species, we investigated the mechanisms that underlie this method. In manual outcrossing experiments, application of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to pollen donor plants did not produce any transformed progeny, whereas application of Agrobacterium to pollen recipient plants yielded transformants at a rate of 0.48%. Agrobacterium strains with T-DNA carrying gusA (encoding ␤-glucuronidase [GUS]) under the control of 35S, LAT52, or ACT11 promoters revealed delivery of GUS activity to developing ovules, whereas no GUS staining of pollen or pollen tubes was observed. Transformants derived from the same seed pod contained independent T-DNA integration events. In Arabidopsis flowers, the gynoecium develops as an open, vase-like structure that fuses to form closed locules roughly 3 d prior to anthesis. In correlation with this fact, we found that the timing of Agrobacterium infection was critical. Transformants were obtained and GUS staining of ovules and embryo sacs was observed only if the Agrobacterium were applied5dormore prior to anthesis. A 6-fold higher rate of transformation was obtained with a CRABS-CLAW mutant that maintains an open gynoecium. Our results suggest that ovules are the site of productive transformation in the floral-dip method, and further suggest that Agrobacterium must be delivered to the interior of the developing gynoecium prior to locule closure if efficient transformation is to be achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • Atspo11-1 Is Necessary for Efficient Meiotic Recombination in Plants
    The EMBO Journal Vol. 20 No. 3 pp. 589±600, 2001 AtSPO11-1 is necessary for ef®cient meiotic recombination in plants Mathilde Grelon1, Daniel Vezon, (reviewed in Smith and Nicolas, 1998; PaÃques and Haber, Ghislaine Gendrot and Georges Pelletier 1999). There are now several indications that DSBs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are initiated by the Spo11 Station de GeÂneÂtique et d'AmeÂlioration des Plantes, INRA de Versailles, Route de St-Cyr, 78026 Versailles Cedex, France protein, which has been found linked to the 5¢ termini of the broken DNA molecules in rad50S yeast mutants 1Corresponding author (Keeney et al., 1997). Spo11 belongs to a novel family of e-mail: [email protected] type II topoisomerase (topoisomerase VI, subunit A), suggesting that Spo11 is the protein that catalyses the The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Spo11 protein catalyses formation of DSBs through a 5¢-phosphotyrosyl linkage DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) that initiate (Bergerat et al., 1997). Sequence comparison of the meiotic recombination. The model plant Arabidopsis members of the topoisomerase VI/SPO11 family, as well thaliana possesses at least three SPO11 homologues. as structural analyses of one of its members (topoisome- T-DNA and ethyl-methane sulfonate mutagenesis rase VI A of Methanococcus jannaschii; Nichols et al., allowed us to show that meiotic progression is altered 1999), permitted the de®nition of several conserved in plants in which the AtSPO11-1 gene is disrupted. domains involved in DNA binding and cleavage Both male and female meiocytes formed very few (Bergerat et al., 1997; Aravind et al., 1998; Nichols bivalents. Furthermore, no fully synapsed chromo- et al., 1999).
    [Show full text]