Bedrock Geology of the Kingfield and Anson

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bedrock Geology of the Kingfield and Anson BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF THE KINGFIELD AND ANSON QUADRANGLES, FRANKLIN AND SOMERSET COUNTIES, MAINE by Kost A. Pankiwskyj Department of Geology and Geophysics University of Hawaii Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Location l Previous work l Regional geologic setting 3 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE METAMORPHOSED ROCKS 4 General Statement 4 Sangerville Formation (Ss) 4 Name 4 Internal stratigraphy and distribution 4 Lithology and mineralogy 6 Contacts and thickness 8 Perry Mountain Formation 11 Name 11 Internal stratigraphy and distribution 11 Lithology and mineralogy 11 Contacts and thickness 13 Parkman Hill Formation (Sph) 13 Name 13 Distribution 13 Lithology and mineralogy 13 Contacts and thickness 14 Smalls Falls Formation (Ssf) 15 Name 15 Distribution 15 Lithology and mineralogy 15 Contacts and thickness 17 Fall Brook Formation (DSf) 17 Name 17 Distribution 17 Lithology and mineralogy 17 Contacts and thickness 19 Madrid Formation (DSm) 19 Name 19 Distribution 20 Lithology and mineralogy 20 Contacts and thickness 20 Carrabassett Formation (De) 23 Name 23 Distribution 23 Lithology and mineralogy 23 Contacts and thickness 24 Hildreth Formation 25 Name 25 Distribution 25 Lithology and mineralogy 25 Contacts and thickness 28 Seboomook Formation 28 Name 28 Internal stratigraphy and distribution 28 Mount Blue Member (Dsm) 29 Name 29 Distribution 29 Lithology and mineralogy 29 Contacts and thickness 31 Temple Stream Member (Dst) 31 Name 31 Distribution 31 Lithology and mineralogy 31 Contacts and thickness 34 Day Mountain Member (Dsd) 34 Name 34 Internal stratigraphy and distribution 35 Lithology and mineralogy 35 Contacts and thickness 38 IGNEOUS ROCKS 39 General Statement 39 Sugarloaf Massif (Dga) 39 Lexington Batholith (Dqm and Ded) 39 Old Point Pluton (Dgr) 40 Age of the igneous rocks 40 STRUCTURAL· GEOLOGY 41 General Statement 41 Premetamorphic soft sediment slump faulting - S 41 Synmetamorphic major folding and associated thrust faulting - F 42 Intrusion of plutonic rocks accomapnied by second generation fotding - F2 44 Postmetamorphic faulting - F3 44 Intrusion of mafic dikes - D 44 METAMORPHISM 45 General Statement 45 Prograde metamorphism of calcareous rocks 45 Prograde metamorphism of non-calcareous rocks 48 REFERENCES CITED 49 Illustrations Figure 1 Locations of the 15' quadrangles referred to in the text 2 2 Correlation among the northwestern limb, the central part and the southeastern limb of the Merrimack Synclinorium 5 3 Modes of the Sangerville Formation 9-10 4 Modes of the Perry Mountain Formation 12 5 Modes of the Parkman Hill Formation and of the Smalls Falls Formation 16 6 Modes of the Fall Brook Formation and of the·Madrid Formation 21-22 7 Modes of the Carrabassett Formation and of the Hildreth Formation 26-27 8 Modes of the Mount Blue Member and of the Temple Stream Member of the Seboomook Formation 32-33 9 Modes of thP. Day Mountain Member of the Seboomook Formation 36-37 10 Mineral assemblages in calcareous metasediments 46 11 Mineral assemblages in non-calcareous metasediments 47 Plate 1 separate Plate 2 II Plate 3 II MAINE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF THE KINGFIELD AND ANSON QUADRANGLES BY Kost A. Pankiwskyj Department of Geology and Geophysics University of Hawaii INTRODUCTION LOCATION The Kingfield and Anson 15' Quadrangles are located in the western part of Maine, both between 44045• and 45°00' north latitude, and respectively between 70°00' and 70015 1 west longtitude and 69°45' and 10°00• west longi­ tude. Beginning with the 1959 field season, I have been engaged with the detailed mapping of these two quadrangles and in addition of the Dixfield Quadrangle, the Farmington Quadrangle, and the Norridgewock Quadrangle, which are respectively southwest, south, and southeast of the Kingfield Quadrangle. The reader is referred to the index map, Figure 1, which shows the relationships among these quadrangles as well as others which are mentioned in this paper. PREVIOUS WORK Early mention of the geology in the Kingfield and Anson Quadrangles is in the reports of Jackson (1838, 1939) and of Hitchcock (1861, 1862, 1863) who note bedrock exposures on roads, in the rivers, and on prominent mountains. Emmons (1910) mentions a small mining operation in the north­ western corner of the Anson Quadrangle. The geology of this area is included in the map of the entire state by Keith (1933). Allen and Pratt (1959) and Allen (1955) note occurrences of limestone within the area. The first detailed studies are by Cariani (1958) of the Anson Quadrangle, and by Skapinski (1961) of the Kingfield Quadrangle, both unpublished Ph.D disserta­ tions at Boston University. Doyle (1967) shows the geQlogy of the areas on the 1: 500, 000 scale state map with information based in part on these theses and in part on reconnaissance work by the writer. Raabe (1969, 1970) discusses the structural relationships in the northern part of the Kingfield Quadrangle. Pankiwskyj and others (1976) include part of this area in a discussion of stratigraphic relationships on the southeastern limb of the Merrimack Synclinorium, 70°30 1 69°30 1 60°00 1 45°30' - Gr St LiB Bi Kb Gu DoF - 45°00' Ra Ph Kf An Sk Ru Di Fa No Wa 1 1 44°30 - - 44°30 BrP Bu Li Au Va 10°30' 69°30 1 69°00' An Anson Li Livermore Au Augusta LiB Little Bigelow Mountain Bi Bingham No Norridgewock BrP Bryant Pond Ph Phillips Bu Buckfield Ra Rangeley Di Dixfield Ru Rumford DoF Dover-Foxcroft Sk Skowhegan Fa Farmington St Stratton Gr Greenville Va Vassalboro Gu Guilford WA Waterville Ki Kingsbury Kf Kingfield FIGURE 1. Location of the 15' quadrangles referred to in the text. 2 REGIONAL GEOLOGIC SETTING The Kingfield and Anson Quadrangles are located respectively in the trough and on the southeastern limb of the Merrimack Synclinorium. This structural feature, originally defined in New Hampshire by Billings (1956), was extended into western Maine by Osberg and others (1968) and into central Maine by Pankiwskyj and others (1976). Stratigraphic sections were defined by a number of workers studying portions of the synclinorium in different localities, and as a result a complicated stratigraphic nomenclature has been inherited. On the northwestern limb, Moench (1971) defined the following post­ Ordovician section in the Rangeley and Phillips Quadrangles (see Index Map, Figure 1): Unnamed Devonian (?) rocks Hildreth Formation of Devonian and Devonian (?) age Seboomook (?) Formation Madrid Formation Smalls Falls Formation Perry Mountain Formation of Silurian (?) age Rangeley Formation Subsequently, on the nqrthwestei:n limb, Boone (1973), working in the Little Bigelow Mountain Quadrangle and the western part of the Bingham Quadrangle (see Index Map, Figure 1) redefined the Unnamed Devonian (?) rocks of Moench as the Seboomook Formation, and the Seboomook, (?) Formation of Moench as the newly defined Carrabassett Formation. On the far southeastern limb, Osberg (1968) defined the following section in the Waterville-Vassalboro area (see Index Map, Figure 1.): Vassalboro Formation of Silurian or Devonian age Waterville Formation of Silurian age Mayflower Hill Formation· In the interim, a number of geologists working with the Maine Geological Survey were mapping areas in between those covered by Moench and by Osberg. In this more central part of the Merrimack Synclinorium a new set of strati­ graphic names was informally established, The formations in this area are dated by means of graptolites from twelve localities found by A. Ludman in the Anson, Skowhegan, Kingsbury, and Guild£ord Quadrangles. To the east, J, Griffin has found eleven additonal graptolite localities in the same belt of rocks. In comparison, there are only three graptolite localities in the Waterville-Vassalboro area mapped by Osberg, and no fossil localities in the Phillips and Rangeley Quadrangles mapped by Moench. The formations in the central part of the Merrimack Synclinorium have not been traced physically into those on either of the two limbs because of intervening younger rocks and because of faults. However, the formations in the central part of the synclinorium are correlated with those on either limb by means of stratigra­ phic-lithologic similarity. The fossil ages from the Waterville-Vassalboro 3 area also strengthen the correlation. It was, however, decided by A. Ludman, J. Griffin, and myself (Pankiwskyj and others, 1976) to introduce new stratigraphic names, primarily because of the superior fossil data in the central belt and .because of pronounced sedimentary facies changes, The stratigraphic names of Osberg and of Moench are retained only: 1. in outcrop belts physically traceable into areas in which these older formation names have been used in published reports, and, 2. in outcrop belts adjacent to those in (1) above, in which are. present rock types of the same sedimentary facies as in (1). The stratigraphic nomenclature of this report is shown in column 3 of Figure 2. With but a few changes it follows that established by Pankiwskyj and others (1976). The nomenclature within the Devonian section has been not only confusing, but also inconsistant (cf. Moench, 1971,with Boone, 1973,as shown in Figure 2 of this paper). In this paper a scheme is followed in line with that to be described in Moench and others (in preparation). This is also shown in column 3 of Figure 2. STRATIGRAPHY OF THE METAMORPHOSED ROCKS GENERAL STATEMENT The stratigraphic section in the Kingfield and Anson Quadrangles is presented in Figure 2. In addition, there is a brief explanation column on each of the two geologic maps, plus a fuller description of the rock types in each formation on the sheet with the geologic cross sections. SANGERVILLE FORMATION (Ss) NAME. The formation was formally established and defined in Pankiwskyj and others (1976). One change is made here; viz., the Anasagunticook Formation of Pankiwskyj and others (1976) is made a member of the Sangerville Formation, Also the Patch Mountain Forll\ilt:J:Qn of Guidotti (.1965) is.
Recommended publications
  • Maine Rivers Study
    MAINE RIVERS STUDY Final Report State of Maine Department of Conservation U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Mid-Atlantic Regional Office May 1982 Electronic Edition August 2011 DEPLW-1214 i Table of Contents Study Participants i Acknowledgments iii Section I - Major Findings 1 Section II - Introduction 7 Section III - Study Method and Process 8 Step 1 Identification and Definition of Unique River Values 8 Step 2 Identification of Significant River Resource Values 8 Step 3 River Category Evaluation 9 Step 4 River Category Synthesis 9 Step 5 Comparative River Evaluation 9 Section IV - River Resource Categories 11 Unique Natural Rivers - Overview 11 A. Geologic / Hydrologic Features 11 B. River Related Critical / Ecologic Resources 14 C. Undeveloped River Areas 20 D. Scenic River Resources 22 E. Historical River Resources 26 Unique Recreational Rivers - Overview 27 A. Anadromous Fisheries 28 B. River Related Inland Fisheries 30 C. River Related Recreational Boating 32 Section V - Final List of Rivers 35 Section VI - Documentation of Significant River Related 46 (Maps to be linked to GIS) Natural and Recreational Values Key to Documentation Maps 46 Section VII – Options for Conservation of Rivers 127 River Conservation – Energy Development Coordination 127 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Consistency 127 State Agency Consistency 128 Federal Coordination Using the National Wild & Scenic Rivers Act 129 Federal Consistency on Coastal Rivers 129 Designation into National River System 130 ii State River Conservation Legislation
    [Show full text]
  • Flood of April 1987 in Maine
    FLOOD OF APRIL 1987 IN MAINE By Richard A. Fontaine and Joseph P. Nielsen U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 92-141 Prepared in cooperation with the MAINE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Augusta, Maine 1991 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR ., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL S0RVEY DALLAS L. PECK, Director For additional information write: Copies of report can be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section Water Resources Division U.S. Geol Dgical Survey 26 Canneston Drive Box 25425 Federal Center Augusta, ME 04330 Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract............................................................. 1 Introduction......................................................... 1 Purpose and scope .............................................. 2 Acknowledgments................................................ 2 Hydrometeorologic setting............................................ 2 Physiography and geology....................................... 2 Antecedent hydrologic conditions ............................... 4 Runoff................................................... 13 Storage.................................................. 15 Storm characteristics.......................................... 17 Precipitation............................................ 18 Temperature.............................................. 22 Description of flood................................................. 23 Flood discharge and frequency.................................. 24 Flood crests..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • People in Nature: Environmental History of the Kennebec River, Maine Daniel J
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library 2003 People in Nature: Environmental History of the Kennebec River, Maine Daniel J. Michor Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the History Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, and the Sustainability Commons Recommended Citation Michor, Daniel J., "People in Nature: Environmental History of the Kennebec River, Maine" (2003). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 188. http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/188 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. PEOPLE IN NATURE: ENVlRONMENTAL HISTORY OF THE KENNEBEC RIVER, MAINE BY Daniel J. Michor B.A. University of Wisconsin, 2000 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (in History) The Graduate School The University of Maine May, 2003 Advisory Committee: Richard Judd, Professor of History, Advisor Howard Segal, Professor of History Stephen Hornsby, Professor of Anthropology Alexander Huryn, Associate Professor of Aquatic Entomology PEOPLE IN NATURE: ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY OF THE KENNEBEC RIVER, MAINE By Daniel J. Michor Thesis Advisor: Dr. Richard Judd An Abstract of the Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (in History) May, 2003 The quality of a river affects the tributaries, lakes, and estuary it feeds; it affects the wildlife and vegetation that depend on the river for energy, nutrients, and habitat, and also affects the human community in the form of use, access, pride, and sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Supply of the United States 1960
    Surface Water Supply of the United States 1960 Part 1 -A. North Atlantic Slope Basins, Maine to Connecticut Prepared under the direction of E. L. HENDRICKS, Chief, Surface Water Branch GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1701 Prepared in cooperation with the States of Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont, and with other agencies UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1961 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. PREFACE This report was prepared by the Geological Survey in coopera­ tion with the States of Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont, and with other agencies, by personnel of the Water Resources Division, L. B. Leopold, chief, under the general direction of E. L. Hendricks, chief, Surface Water Branch, and F. J. Flynn, chief, Basic Records Section. The data were collected and computed under supervision of dis­ trict engineers, Surface Water Branch, as follows: D. F. Dougherty............................................................. Albany, N. Y. G. S. Hayes................................................................. Augusta, Maine John Horton................................................................. Hartford, Conn. C. E. Knox................................................................... Boston, Mass, HI CALENDAR FOR WATER YEAR 1960
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment
    NEW ENGLAND CLEAN ENERGY CONNECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DOE/EA-2155 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF ELECTRICITY WASHINGTON, DC JANUARY 2021 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDICES ................................................................................................................................. V FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................ V TABLES .......................................................................................................................................... V ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................ VII 1. CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PRESIDENTIAL PERMITS .................................................................................................... 2 1.2 SCOPE OF DOE’S ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ................................................................ 2 1.3 RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS .......................................................................... 3 1.3.1 Department of the Army Environmental Assessment and Statement of Findings for the Above-Referenced Standard Individual Permit Application [i.e., CENAE-RDC; NAE-2017-01342]” (July 7, 2020) and Environmental Assessment Addendum; Central Maine Power Company (CMP); New England Clean Energy Connect (NECEC); File No. NAE-2017-01342
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment F Scenic Resource Chart.Pdf
    Attachment F – Scenic Resource Chart Scenic Resource Town County Type Topo Forest TJDA Field TJDA Model Project Visibility Visual Impact Visibility Visibility Visit Overlay Table 1. National Natural Landmarks and other Outstanding Natural and Cultural Features within 3 Miles of NECEC Moose River-Number 5 Bradstreet Twp., Somerset NNL Y Y Y N Viewshed map indicates potential but fieldwork Bog T5 R7 BKP WKR confirmed intervening vegetation will screen within 3 miles of the Project Number 5 Bog CE T5 R7 BKP WKR Somerset NNL Y N Y N Minimal/ Negligible Table 2. State or National Wildlife Refuges, Sanctuaries, or Preserves and State Game Refuges within 3 Miles of NECEC Chesterville WMA Jay Chesterville WMA Y N Y N No visibility due to intervening terrain/vegetation Chesterville WMA Jay, Chesterville Chesterville WMA Y Y Y N No visibility due to intervening terrain/vegetation Fahi Pond WMA Embden Somerset WMA Y Y Y Y Minimal/ Negligible, tip of one structure potential Thurston WMA New Gloucester Cumberland WMA N N N N No visibility due to intervening terrain/vegetation Tolla Wolla WMA Livermore Androscoggin WMA Y Y Y Y Not likely or heavily filtered due to intervening vegetation Androscoggin Lake Leeds Androscoggin Focus Area Y Y N N Not likely due to intervening terrain/vegetation Attean Pond - Moose Appleton Twp., Somerset Focus Area Y Y Y N Attean Pond - Not likely or heavily filtered due to River Bradstreet Twp., intervening vegetation T5 Moose River - Viewshed map indicates potential R7 BKP WKR but fieldwork confirmed intervening vegetation will screen within 3 miles of the Project Bald Mountain East Moxie Twp.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 North Zone Rivers & Streams with Fall Fishing Opportunities
    2020 North Zone Rivers & Streams with Fall Fishing Opportunities Note: This list is a summary of North Zone rivers and streams that allow angling during the 2020 fall season and may contain errors or omissions. Be advised - The fall opportunity may only exist on a discrete section! Please refer to the 2020 Open Water and Ice Fishing Laws as the official source of 2020 regulations. COUNTY WATER NAME TOWNS SPECIAL REGULATIONS Aroostook BLACK RIVER, BIG T14 R16 WELS BLACK RIVER, BIG, T14 R16 WELS to T15 R13 WELS to T15 R13 (North Zone). General fishing laws apply, except: S- WELS 11. Closed to the taking of live baitfish except by hook and line. From October 1 - November 30: ALO. Open to taking bass and muskellunge only. From the confluence of Fivemile Brook in T15 R14 WELS upriver to the confluence of Depot Stream in T14 R15 WELS: B. S-19. Aroostook BLACK RIVER, LITTLE T19 R12 WELS BLACK RIVER, LITTLE, TRIBUTARY TO THE SAINT to Allagash JOHN RIVER, T19 R12 WELS to Allagash (North Zone). General fishing laws apply, except: S-11. Closed to the taking of live baitfish. Motorboats over 10 horsepower prohibited from June 1 - September 15. From the confluence with the St. John River up river to the confluence of Carrie Bogan Brook in T18 R11 WELS: From October 1 - November 30: ALO. Open to taking bass and muskellunge only. Aroostook DAAQUAM RIVER T11 R17 WELS DAAQUAM RIVER, T11 R17 WELS (North Zone). General fishing laws apply, except: S-11. Closed to the taking of live baitfish except by hook and line.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine Revised Statutes 38 §467
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Maine Revised Statutes 38 §467 Maine Revised Statutes Title 38: WATERS AND NAVIGATION Chapter 3: PROTECTION AND IMPROVEMENT OF WATERS Subchapter 1: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BOARD Article 4-A: WATER CLASSIFICATION PROGRAM §467. Classification of major river basins All surface waters lying within the boundaries of the State that are in river basins having a drainage area greater than 100 square miles that are not classified as lakes or ponds are classified in this section. [1989, c. 764, §2 (AMD).] 1. Androscoggin River Basin. A. Androscoggin River, main stem, including all impoundments. (1) From the Maine-New Hampshire boundary to its confluence with the Ellis River - Class B. (2) From its confluence with the Ellis River to a line formed by the extension of the Bath-Brunswick boundary across Merrymeeting Bay in a northwesterly direction - Class C. [1989, c. 890, Pt. A, §40 (AFF); 1989, c. 890, Pt. B, §68 (AMD); MRSA T. 38, §467, sub-§1, ¶ A (AMD).] B. Little Androscoggin River Drainage. (1) Little Androscoggin River, main stem. (a) From the outlet of Bryant Pond to the Maine Central Railroad bridge in South Paris - Class A. (b) From the Maine Central Railroad bridge in South Paris to its confluence with the Androscoggin River - Class C.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Salmon EFH the Proposed EFH Designation for Atlantic Salmon
    Atlantic salmon EFH The proposed EFH designation for Atlantic salmon includes the rivers, estuaries, and bays that are listed in Table 31 and shown in Map 105, which exhibit the environmental conditions defined in the text descriptions. Smaller tributaries not shown on the map are also EFH for one or more life stage as long as they conform to the proposed habitat descriptions. All EFH river systems form a direct connection to the sea, but EFH would not include portions of rivers above naturally occurring barriers to upstream migration or land-locked lakes and ponds. The oceanic component of EFH is to a distance of three miles from the mouth of each river. The new designation includes six new drainage systems not included in the original list of 26 rivers that were designated in 1998. All of them are in the Maine coastal sub-region (Chandler, Indian, Pleasant, St. George, Medomak, and Pemaquid rivers). All told, 30 river systems in nine New England sub-regions are designated for Atlantic salmon EFH. The new map includes a more continuous series of bays and areas adjacent to river mouths that are within three miles of the coast. Designated EFH in Long Island Sound has been reduced to small areas where the Connecticut and Pawcatuck Rivers empty into the sound, rather than taking up the entire sound. Also, there are a number of improvements in the text descriptions which make the habitat requirements for each life stage more specific and applicable to three separate juvenile life stages (fry, parr, and smolts). Text descriptions: Essential fish habitat for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) is designated as the rivers, estuaries, and bays that are listed in Table 31 and shown in Map 105.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FLOODS of MARCH 1936 Part 1
    If you do jno*-Be <l this report after it has served your purpose, please return it to the Geolocical -"" Survey, using the official mailing label at the end UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR THE FLOODS OF MARCH 1936 Part 1. NEW ENGLAND RIVERS Prepared in cooperation withihe FEDERAL EMERGENCY ADMINISTRATION OF PUBLIC WORKS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 798 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Water-Supply Paper 798 THS^LOODS OF MARCH 1936 PART 1. NEW ENGLAND RIVERS NATHAN C. GROVER Chief Hydraulic Engineer Prepared in cooperation with the FEDERAL EMERGENCY ADMINISTRATION OF PUBLIC WORKS UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1937 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. Price 70 cents CONTENTS Page Abstract............................................................. 1 Introduction......................................................... 2 Authorization........................................................ 5 Administration and personnel......................................... 5 Acknowledgments...................................................... 6 General features of the storms....................................... 7 Floods of the New England rivers....................................o 12 Meteorologic and hydrologic conditions............................... 25 Precipitation records............................................ 25 General f>!-................................................... 25 Distr<* '-utlon
    [Show full text]
  • PEOPLE in NATURE: Envlronmental HISTORY of the KENNEBEC RIVER, MAINE
    PEOPLE IN NATURE: ENVlRONMENTAL HISTORY OF THE KENNEBEC RIVER, MAINE BY Daniel J. Michor B.A. University of Wisconsin, 2000 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (in History) The Graduate School The University of Maine May, 2003 Advisory Committee: Richard Judd, Professor of History, Advisor Howard Segal, Professor of History Stephen Hornsby, Professor of Anthropology Alexander Huryn, Associate Professor of Aquatic Entomology PEOPLE IN NATURE: ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY OF THE KENNEBEC RIVER, MAINE By Daniel J. Michor Thesis Advisor: Dr. Richard Judd An Abstract of the Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (in History) May, 2003 The quality of a river affects the tributaries, lakes, and estuary it feeds; it affects the wildlife and vegetation that depend on the river for energy, nutrients, and habitat, and also affects the human community in the form of use, access, pride, and sustainability. In an age of mass consumerism and materialism, dwindling natural resources and wild spaces, and advanced technology, the ability to make a living and at the same time enjoy the benefits of rural living is increasingly difficult. Using the entire Kennebec River watershed as the scale of investigation with particular focus on the river comdor itself, my project looks at the interconnectedness of the river and the surrounding human community in a whole ecosystem analysis. Through coordinated efforts in the 1960s and 1970s in pollution abatement control and natural resource management, the communities of central Maine improved water quality in the Kennebec River from what was once described as an "open sewer" to conditions that provide for thriving aquatic life and improved access, enjoyment and economic health for the people.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.0 Kennebec River Basin
    4.0 Kennebec River Basin 4.1 Watershed Description The Kennebec River Basin occupies approximately 5,900 square miles of southwestern Maine. The headwaters of the river basin originate in the Appalachian Mountains on the international border with Canada. The upper two-thirds of the basin above Waterville are hilly and mountainous and the lower third of the basin has the gentle topography representative of a coastal drainage area. Major communities in this basin include Bingham, Anson, Madison, Norridgewock, Skowhegan, Waterville, Winslow, Augusta, Hallowell, and Gardiner. The Kennebec River originates at Moosehead Lake and flows south approximately 145 miles to Merrymeeting Bay. Table 27 presents the major tributaries to the Kennebec River along with their respective contributing area. The Kennebec River joins the Androscoggin River in Merrymeeting Bay before exiting to the ocean at Fort Popham. The Kennebec River is influenced by tidal process as far as Augusta, 25 miles above Abagadassett Point. Figure 10 illustrates the locations of major tributaries located within the Kennebec River basin. 4-1 October 2007 C:\Documents and Settings\swiding\Desktop\Maine River Basin Report _Final4.doc Table 27. Kennebec River, Tributaries from Upstream to Downstream and Drainage Areas Contributing Area Tributary (square miles) South Branch Moose River 70 Moose River (2) above Attean Pond 180 Moose River (3) at Long Pond 310 Brassua Lake 160 Moosehead Lake 550 Kennebec River (2) above The Forks 320 North Branch Dead River 200 South Branch Dead River 150 Flagstaff Lake 170 Dead River 360 Kennebec River (4) at Wyman Dam 160 Austin Stream 90 Kennebec River (6) 110 Carrabassett River 400 Sandy River 590 Kennebec River at Waterville Dam 410 Sebasticook River at Pittsfield 320 Sebasticook River (3) at Burnham 270 Sebasticook River (4) at Winslow 370 Messalonskee Stream 210 Cobbosseecontee Stream 220 Kennebec River at Merrymeeting Bay 320 Total 5,930 4-2 October 2007 C:\Documents and Settings\swiding\Desktop\Maine River Basin Report _Final4.doc Figure 10.
    [Show full text]