Unsupervised Dialogue Intent Detection Via Hierarchical Topic Model

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Unsupervised Dialogue Intent Detection Via Hierarchical Topic Model Unsupervised dialogue intent detection via hierarchical topic model Artem Popov1;2, Victor Bulatov1, Darya Polyudova1, Eugenia Veselova1 1Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology 2Lomonosov Moscow State University [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract labeling challenge easier. The resulting labels will be more consistent and better suitable for model One of the challenges during a task- training. oriented chatbot development is the scarce Simple intent analysis is based on empirical availability of the labeled training data. rules, e.g. “question” intent contains phrase “what The best way of getting one is to ask the is # of #” (Yan et al., 2017). More universal and assessors to tag each dialogue according robust dialogue systems should work without any to its intent. Unfortunately, performing la- supervision or defined rules. Such systems can beling without any provisional collection be implemented with automatic extraction of the structure is difficult since the very notion semantic hierarchy from the query by multi-level of the intent is ill-defined. clustering, based on different semantic frames (ca- In this paper, we propose a hierarchical pability, location, characteristics etc.) in sentences multimodal regularized topic model to ob- (Chen et al., 2015). In our work intents represent a tain a first approximation of the intent more complex entity which combine all intentions set. Our rationale for hierarchical mod- and objectives. els usage is their ability to take into ac- Many previous works take advantage of hier- count several degrees of the dialogues rel- archical structures in user intention analysis. In evancy. We attempt to build a model paper (Shepitsen et al., 2008) automatic approach that can distinguish between subject-based through hierarchical clustering for document tag- (e.g. medicine and transport topics) and ging is used. However, this approach does not take action-based (e.g. filing of an application advantage of peculiar phrase features, such as syn- and tracking application status) similari- tax or specific words order. Syntactic parsing of ties. In order to achieve this, we divide intention was applied in (Gupta et al., 2018) to set of all features into several groups ac- decompose client intent. This hierarchical repre- cording to part-of-speech analysis. Vari- sentation is similar to a constituency syntax tree. ous feature groups are treated differently It contains intentions and objects as tree elements on different hierarchy levels. and demands deep analysis of every sentence. At- tempt to extract subintents along with main in- 1 Introduction tent can be found in paper (Tang et al., 2018), but One of the most important goals of task-oriented as proved below it is not necessary to apply neu- dialogue systems is to identify the user intention ral networks for precise and efficient retrieval of from the user utterances. State-of-the-art solutions multi-intent, especially in unsupervised task. like (Chen et al., 2017) require a lot of labeled We propose a hierarchical multimodal regular- data. User’s utterances (one or several for a dia- ized topic model as a simple and efficient solu- logue) have to be tagged by the intent of the dia- tion for accurate approximation of the collection logue. structure. The main contribution of this paper is This is a challenging task for a new dialogue the construction of a two-level hierarchical topic collection because the set of all possible intents model using different features on the first and sec- is unknown. Giving a provisional hierarchical col- ond levels. To the best of our knowledge, this is lection structure to assessors could make the intent the first work that investigates that possibility. We 932 Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, pages 932–938, Varna, Bulgaria, Sep 2–4, 2019. https://doi.org/10.26615/978-954-452-056-4_108 introduce a custom evaluation metric which mea- ample, Wikipedia. Further improvement in qual- sures the quality of hierarchical relations between ity of clustering models with embeddings can be topics and intent detection. achieved through fine-tuning. Similar to the tf- The hierarchy structure helps to make a provi- idf approach dimensionality reduction is often em- sional clustering more interpretative. Namely, we ployed for the clustering problem (Park et al., require first level topics to describe the dialogue 2019). Several averaging schemes can be used subject and the second level topics to describe the to aggregate word embeddings: mean, where all action user is interested in. We accomplish this words contribute equally to the document, or idf- by incorporating information about part-of-speech weighted, where rare words have a greater contri- (PoS) tags into the model. bution than frequent words. This paper is organized as follows. Section 2.2 Topic modeling two describes popular approaches to an unsuper- vised text classification. Section three describes Another approach to text clustering problem is our reasoning behind our choices of model archi- topic modeling. The topic model simultaneously tecture. Section four briefly reviews our prepro- computes words and document embeddings and cessing pipeline and introduces several enhance- perform clusterization. It should be noted that ments to the existing NLP techniques. We demon- in some cases topic model-based embeddings out- strate the results of our model in section five. We perform traditional word embeddings, (Potapenko conclude our work in section six. et al., 2017). The probability of the word w in the document d is represented by formula below: 2 Text clustering approaches X X 2.1 Embeddings approaches p(w j d) = p(w j t)p(t j d) = φwtθtd The simplest way to build a clustering model on t2T t2T a collection of text documents includes two steps. where matrix Φ contains probabilities φwt of word On the first step, each document is mapped to a w in topic t, matrix Θ contains probabilities θtd of real-valued vector. On the second step, one of the topic t in document d. standard clustering algorithms is applied to the re- Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis (pLSA) sulting vectors. (Hofmann, 2000) is the simplest topic model There are many methods to build an embedding which describes words in documents by a mix- of a document. The simplest way is the tf-idf ture of hidden topics. The Φ and Θ distribu- representation. Logistic regression on the tf-idf tions are obtained via maximization of the like- representation is quite a strong algorithm for the lihood given probabilistic normalization and non- text classification problem. This algorithm is re- negativity constraints: spectable baseline even in deep neural networks research (Park et al., 2019). However, the di- X X rect use of the tf-idf representation leads to poor L(Φ; Θ) = ndw log p(wjd) ! max Φ;Θ results in the clustering problem because of the d2D w2W curse of dimensionality. Dimensionality reduction X φ = 1; φ ≥ 0 methods could be used to improve clustering qual- wt wt w2W ity: PCA or Uniform Manifold Approximation X and Projection (UMAP, McInnes et al.(2018)). θtd = 1; θtd ≥ 0 Another popular approach makes use of differ- t2T ent word embeddings (Esposito et al., 2016). First This optimization problem can be effectively of all, each word is mapped to a real-valued vector. solved via EM-algorithm or its online modifica- Then the document representation is derived from tions (Kochedykov et al., 2017). the embeddings of its words. The most popular Latend Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) (Blei et al., embedding models belong to the word2vec family 2003) model is an extension of pLSA with a prior (Mikolov et al., 2013b): CBOW, Skip-gram and estimation of the Φ and Θ, widely used in topic their modifications (Mikolov et al.(2013a)). For modelling. However, as a solution for both pLSA correct representation word2vec models should be and LDA optimization problem is not unique, each trained on a large collection of documents, for ex- solution may have different characteristics. 933 Additive Regularization of Topic Models p(tjd; w) more stable for w belonging to a same (ARTM) (Vorontsov and Potapenko, 2015) is local segment. In a way, p(tjd; w) distribution non-bayesian extension of likelihood optimization could be interpreted as the analogue for context task, providing robustness of the solution by ap- embeddings in topic modeling world. p(tjd; w) plying different regularizers. Each regularizer distribution isn’t used directly for topic represen- is used to pursue different solution characteris- tation, but it is used on the E-step of EM-algorithm tics. For example, many varieties of LDA can for φwt and θtd recalculation. be obtained from ARTM model by using certain In order to obtain more control over intent ro- smoothing regularizer; pLSA model is an ARTM bustness we propose to use a two-level hierarchi- model without regularizers. Furthermore, docu- cal topic model. The first level is responsible for ments can contain not only words but also terms of coarse-grained similarity, while the second one other modalities (e.g. authors, classes, n-grams), could take into account less obvious but important which allow us to select specific for our task lan- differences. guage features. In this case, instead of a sin- The hierarchical ARTM model consists of two gle Φ matrix, we have several Φm matrices for different ARTM models for each level, which are each modality m. Resulting functional to be opti- linked to each other. The first level of the hierar- mized is the sum of weighted with αm coefficients chical model can be any ARTM model. The sec- modalities likelihoods with regularization terms: ond level is built using regularizer from (Chirkova X and Vorontsov, 2016) which ensures that each αmL(Φm; Θm) + R([mΦm; Θ) ! max Φ;Θ m first-level topic is a convex sum of second-level topics.
Recommended publications
  • WELDA: Enhancing Topic Models by Incorporating Local Word Context
    WELDA: Enhancing Topic Models by Incorporating Local Word Context Stefan Bunk Ralf Krestel Hasso Plattner Institute Hasso Plattner Institute Potsdam, Germany Potsdam, Germany [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT The distributional hypothesis states that similar words tend to have similar contexts in which they occur. Word embedding models exploit this hypothesis by learning word vectors based on the local context of words. Probabilistic topic models on the other hand utilize word co-occurrences across documents to identify topically related words. Due to their complementary nature, these models define different notions of word similarity, which, when combined, can produce better topical representations. In this paper we propose WELDA, a new type of topic model, which combines word embeddings (WE) with latent Dirichlet allo- cation (LDA) to improve topic quality. We achieve this by estimating topic distributions in the word embedding space and exchanging selected topic words via Gibbs sampling from this space. We present an extensive evaluation showing that WELDA cuts runtime by at least 30% while outperforming other combined approaches with Figure 1: Illustration of an LDA topic in the word embed- respect to topic coherence and for solving word intrusion tasks. ding space. The gray isolines show the learned probability distribution for the topic. Exchanging topic words having CCS CONCEPTS low probability in the embedding space (red minuses) with • Information systems → Document topic models; Document high probability words (green pluses), leads to a superior collection models; • Applied computing → Document analysis; LDA topic. KEYWORDS word by the company it keeps” [11]. In other words, if two words topic models, word embeddings, document representations occur in similar contexts, they are similar.
    [Show full text]
  • Generative Topic Embedding: a Continuous Representation of Documents
    Generative Topic Embedding: a Continuous Representation of Documents Shaohua Li1,2 Tat-Seng Chua1 Jun Zhu3 Chunyan Miao2 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 1. School of Computing, National University of Singapore 2. Joint NTU-UBC Research Centre of Excellence in Active Living for the Elderly (LILY) 3. Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University Abstract as continuous vectors in a low-dimensional em- bedding space (Bengio et al., 2003; Mikolov et al., Word embedding maps words into a low- 2013; Pennington et al., 2014; Levy et al., 2015). dimensional continuous embedding space The learned embedding for a word encodes its by exploiting the local word collocation semantic/syntactic relatedness with other words, patterns in a small context window. On by utilizing local word collocation patterns. In the other hand, topic modeling maps docu- each method, one core component is the embed- ments onto a low-dimensional topic space, ding link function, which predicts a word’s distri- by utilizing the global word collocation bution given its context words, parameterized by patterns in the same document. These their embeddings. two types of patterns are complementary. When it comes to documents, we wish to find a In this paper, we propose a generative method to encode their overall semantics. Given topic embedding model to combine the the embeddings of each word in a document, we two types of patterns. In our model, topics can imagine the document as a “bag-of-vectors”. are represented by embedding vectors, and Related words in the document point in similar di- are shared across documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Linked Data Triples Enhance Document Relevance Classification
    applied sciences Article Linked Data Triples Enhance Document Relevance Classification Dinesh Nagumothu * , Peter W. Eklund , Bahadorreza Ofoghi and Mohamed Reda Bouadjenek School of Information Technology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia; [email protected] (P.W.E.); [email protected] (B.O.); [email protected] (M.R.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Standardized approaches to relevance classification in information retrieval use generative statistical models to identify the presence or absence of certain topics that might make a document relevant to the searcher. These approaches have been used to better predict relevance on the basis of what the document is “about”, rather than a simple-minded analysis of the bag of words contained within the document. In more recent times, this idea has been extended by using pre-trained deep learning models and text representations, such as GloVe or BERT. These use an external corpus as a knowledge-base that conditions the model to help predict what a document is about. This paper adopts a hybrid approach that leverages the structure of knowledge embedded in a corpus. In particular, the paper reports on experiments where linked data triples (subject-predicate-object), constructed from natural language elements are derived from deep learning. These are evaluated as additional latent semantic features for a relevant document classifier in a customized news- feed website. The research is a synthesis of current thinking in deep learning models in NLP and information retrieval and the predicate structure used in semantic web research. Our experiments Citation: Nagumothu, D.; Eklund, indicate that linked data triples increased the F-score of the baseline GloVe representations by 6% P.W.; Ofoghi, B.; Bouadjenek, M.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Document and Topic Models: Plsa
    10/4/2018 Document and Topic Models: pLSA and LDA Andrew Levandoski and Jonathan Lobo CS 3750 Advanced Topics in Machine Learning 2 October 2018 Outline • Topic Models • pLSA • LSA • Model • Fitting via EM • pHITS: link analysis • LDA • Dirichlet distribution • Generative process • Model • Geometric Interpretation • Inference 2 1 10/4/2018 Topic Models: Visual Representation Topic proportions and Topics Documents assignments 3 Topic Models: Importance • For a given corpus, we learn two things: 1. Topic: from full vocabulary set, we learn important subsets 2. Topic proportion: we learn what each document is about • This can be viewed as a form of dimensionality reduction • From large vocabulary set, extract basis vectors (topics) • Represent document in topic space (topic proportions) 푁 퐾 • Dimensionality is reduced from 푤푖 ∈ ℤ푉 to 휃 ∈ ℝ • Topic proportion is useful for several applications including document classification, discovery of semantic structures, sentiment analysis, object localization in images, etc. 4 2 10/4/2018 Topic Models: Terminology • Document Model • Word: element in a vocabulary set • Document: collection of words • Corpus: collection of documents • Topic Model • Topic: collection of words (subset of vocabulary) • Document is represented by (latent) mixture of topics • 푝 푤 푑 = 푝 푤 푧 푝(푧|푑) (푧 : topic) • Note: document is a collection of words (not a sequence) • ‘Bag of words’ assumption • In probability, we call this the exchangeability assumption • 푝 푤1, … , 푤푁 = 푝(푤휎 1 , … , 푤휎 푁 ) (휎: permutation) 5 Topic Models: Terminology (cont’d) • Represent each document as a vector space • A word is an item from a vocabulary indexed by {1, … , 푉}. We represent words using unit‐basis vectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Distributed Word Representation and Topic Model by Word-Topic Mixture Model
    JMLR: Workshop and Conference Proceedings 63:190–205, 2016 ACML 2016 Improving Distributed Word Representation and Topic Model by Word-Topic Mixture Model Xianghua Fu [email protected] Ting Wang [email protected] Jing Li [email protected] Chong Yu [email protected] Wangwang Liu [email protected] College of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Shenzhen University, Guangdong China Editors: Robert J. Durrant and Kee-Eung Kim Abstract We propose a Word-Topic Mixture(WTM) model to improve word representation and topic model simultaneously. Firstly, it introduces the initial external word embeddings into the Topical Word Embeddings(TWE) model based on Latent Dirichlet Allocation(LDA) model to learn word embeddings and topic vectors. Then the results learned from TWE are inte- grated in the LDA by defining the probability distribution of topic vectors-word embeddings according to the idea of latent feature model with LDA (LFLDA), meanwhile minimizing the KL divergence of the new topic-word distribution function and the original one. The experimental results prove that the WTM model performs better on word representation and topic detection compared with some state-of-the-art models. Keywords: topic model, distributed word representation, word embedding, Word-Topic Mixture model 1. Introduction Probabilistic topic model is one of the most common topic detection methods. Topic mod- eling algorithms, such as LDA(Latent Dirichlet Allocation) Blei et al. (2003) and related methods Blei (2011), infer probability distributions from frequency statistic, which can only reflect the co-occurrence relationships of words. The semantic information is less considered. Recently, distributed word representations with NNLM(neural network language model) Bengio et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Topic Modeling: Beyond Bag-Of-Words
    Topic Modeling: Beyond Bag-of-Words Hanna M. Wallach [email protected] Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK Abstract While such models may use conditioning contexts of arbitrary length, this paper deals only with bigram Some models of textual corpora employ text models—i.e., models that predict each word based on generation methods involving n-gram statis- the immediately preceding word. tics, while others use latent topic variables inferred using the “bag-of-words” assump- To develop a bigram language model, marginal and tion, in which word order is ignored. Pre- conditional word counts are determined from a corpus viously, these methods have not been com- w. The marginal count Ni is defined as the number bined. In this work, I explore a hierarchi- of times that word i has occurred in the corpus, while cal generative probabilistic model that in- the conditional count Ni|j is the number of times word corporates both n-gram statistics and latent i immediately follows word j. Given these counts, the topic variables by extending a unigram topic aim of bigram language modeling is to develop pre- model to include properties of a hierarchi- dictions of word wt given word wt−1, in any docu- cal Dirichlet bigram language model. The ment. Typically this is done by computing estimators model hyperparameters are inferred using a of both the marginal probability of word i and the con- Gibbs EM algorithm. On two data sets, each ditional probability of word i following word j, such as of 150 documents, the new model exhibits fi = Ni/N and fi|j = Ni|j/Nj, where N is the num- better predictive accuracy than either a hi- ber of words in the corpus.
    [Show full text]
  • Semantic N-Gram Topic Modeling
    EAI Endorsed Transactions on Scalable Information Systems Research Article Semantic N-Gram Topic Modeling Pooja Kherwa1,*, Poonam Bansal1 1Maharaja Surajmal Institute of Technology, C-4 Janak Puri. GGSIPU. New Delhi-110058, India. Abstract In this paper a novel approach for effective topic modeling is presented. The approach is different from traditional vector space model-based topic modeling, where the Bag of Words (BOW) approach is followed. The novelty of our approach is that in phrase-based vector space, where critical measure like point wise mutual information (PMI) and log frequency based mutual dependency (LGMD)is applied and phrase’s suitability for particular topic are calculated and best considerable semantic N-Gram phrases and terms are considered for further topic modeling. In this experiment the proposed semantic N-Gram topic modeling is compared with collocation Latent Dirichlet allocation(coll-LDA) and most appropriate state of the art topic modeling technique latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA). Results are evaluated and it was found that perplexity is drastically improved and found significant improvement in coherence score specifically for short text data set like movie reviews and political blogs. Keywords. Topic Modeling, Latent Dirichlet Allocation, Point wise Mutual Information, Bag of words, Coherence, Perplexity. Received on 16 November 2019, accepted on 10 0Februar20 y 2 , published on 11 February 2020 Copyright © 2020 Pooja Kherwa et al., licensed to EAI. T his is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unlimited use, distribution and reproduction in any medium so long as the original work is properly cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Topical Relevance for Multi-Turn Dialogue Generation
    Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-20) Modeling Topical Relevance for Multi-Turn Dialogue Generation Hainan Zhang2∗ , Yanyan Lan14y , Liang Pang14 , Hongshen Chen2 , Zhuoye Ding2 and Dawei Yin4 1CAS Key Lab of Network Data Science and Technology, Institute of Computing Technology, CAS 2JD.com, Beijing, China 3Baidu.com, Beijing, China 4University of Chinese Academy of Sciences fzhanghainan6,chenhongshen,[email protected], flanyanyan,[email protected],[email protected] Abstract context1 `},(吗?(Hello) context2 有什么问题我可以.¨b? (What can I do for you?) FÁM价了,我要3请保价 Topic drift is a common phenomenon in multi-turn context3 (The product price has dropped. I want a low-price.) dialogue. Therefore, an ideal dialogue generation }的,这边.¨3请,FÁ已Ï60了'? context4 models should be able to capture the topic informa- (Ok, I will apply for you. Have you received the product?) 东西60了发h不(一w吗? tion of each context, detect the relevant context, and context5 (I have received the product without the invoice together.) produce appropriate responses accordingly. How- 开w5P发h不会随'Äú context6 ever, existing models usually use word or sentence (The electronic invoice will not be shipped with the goods.) level similarities to detect the relevant contexts, current context /发我®±吗?(Is it sent to my email?) /的,请¨Ð供®±0@,5P发h24小时Äú。 which fail to well capture the topical level rele- response (Yes, please provide your email address, vance. In this paper, we propose a new model, we will send the electronic invoices in 24 hours.) named STAR-BTM, to tackle this problem. Firstly, the Biterm Topic Model is pre-trained on the whole Table 1: The example from the customer services dataset.
    [Show full text]
  • Text Analysis of QC/Issue Tracker by Natural Language Processing (NLP)
    PharmaSUG 2019 - Paper AD-052 Text Analysis of QC/Issue Tracker by Natural Language Processing (NLP) Tools Huijuan Zhang, Columbia University, New York, NY Todd Case, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA ABSTRACT Many Statistical Programming groups use QC and issue trackers, which typically include text that describe discrepancies or other notes documented during programming and QC, or 'data about the data'. Each text field is associated with one specific question or problem and/or manually classified into a category and a subcategory by programmers (either by free text or a drop-down box with pre-specified issues that are common, such as 'Specs', 'aCRF', 'SDTM', etc.). Our goal is to look at this text data using some Natural Language Processing (NLP) tools. Using NLP tools allows us an opportunity to be more objective about finding high-level (and even granular) themes about our data by using algorithms that parse out categories, typically either by pre-specified number of categories or by summarizing the most common words. Most importantly, using NLP we do not have to look at text line by line, but it rather provides us an idea about what this entire text is telling us about our processes and issues at a high-level, even checking whether the problems were classified correctly and classifying problems that were not classified previously (e.g., maybe a category was forgotten, it didn't fit into a pre-specified category, etc.). Such techniques provide unique insights into data about our data and the possibility to replace manual work, thus improving work efficiency. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how NLP tools can be used in a very practical way: to find trends in data that we would not otherwise be able to find using more traditional approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Topic Modeling Approaches for Understanding COVID-19
    Topic Modeling Approaches for Understanding COVID-19 Misinformation Spread in Sub-Saharan Africa Ezinne Nwankwo1∗ , Chinasa Okolo2 and Cynthia Habonimana3 1Duke University 2Cornell University 3CSU-Long Beach [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract [1]. Fake news is often spread with the intent to provide financial or political gain and is often exacerbated by digi- Since the start of the pandemic, the proliferation tal illiteracy, lack of knowledge surrounding specific topics, of fake news and misinformation has been a con- and religious or personal beliefs that are biased towards fake stant battle for health officials and policy makers as news [2]. To get a sense of what are common themes in the they work to curb the spread of COVID-19. In ar- “fake news” being spread across the African continent and in eas within the Global South, it can be difficult for other developing nations, we thought it would be best to dis- officials to keep track of the growth of such false in- cover what ideologies they are rooted in. From our research, formation and even harder to address the real con- we saw three main themes in fake news being spread across cerns their communities have. In this paper, we Sub-Saharan Africa: distrust of philanthropic organizations, present some techniques the AI community can of- distrust of developed nations, and even distrust of leaders in fer to help address this issue. While the topics pre- their own respective countries. We posit that the distrust in sented within this paper are not a complete solution, these messages stems from the ”colonial-era-driven distrust” we believe they could complement the work gov- of international development organizations [3][4].
    [Show full text]
  • Distributional Approaches to Semantic Analysis
    Distributional approaches to semantic analysis Diarmuid O´ S´eaghdha Natural Language and Information Processing Group Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge [email protected] HIT-MSRA Summer Workshop on Human Language Technology August 2011 http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~do242/Teaching/HIT-MSRA-2011/ Your assignment (Part 2) I We now have two sets of word pairs with similarity judgements: one in English and one in Chinese. They are available on the summer school website, along with a more detailed specification of the assignment. I The task is to take some real corpora and build distributional models, exploring the space of design options that have been sketched in this course: I What is the effect of different context types (e.g., window context versus document context)? I What is the effect of different similarity and distance functions (e.g., cosine and Jensen-Shannon divergence)? I What is the effect of corpus size? I What is the effect of applying association measures such as PMI? I If you do this assignment in full, you will have a good idea how to build a distributional model to help with the NLP tasks you care about! Distributional approaches to semantic analysis Fundamentals of distributional methods 58 Probabilistic semantics and topic modelling What's in today's lecture: A probabilistic interpretation of distributional semantics Topic modelling Selectional preferences Word sense disambiguation Distributional approaches to semantic analysis Probabilistic semantics and topic modelling 59 Probabilistic modelling I Probabilistic modelling (or statistical modelling) explicitly recasts the problem of interest as one of inferring probability distributions over random variables and estimating properties of those distributions.
    [Show full text]
  • Topic Modeling for Natural Language Understanding
    Topic Modeling for Natural Language Understanding A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Drexel University by Xiaoli Song in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2016 c Copyright 2016 Xiaoli Song. ii Acknowledgments Thank God for giving me all the help, strength and determination to complete my thesis. I thank my advisor Dr. Xiaohua Hu. His guidance helped to shape and provided much needed focus to my work. I thank my dissertation committee members: Dr. Weimao Ke, Dr. Yuan An, Dr. Erjia Yan and Dr. Li Sheng for their support and insight throughout my research. I would also like to thank my fellow graduate students Zunyan Xiong, Jia Huang, Wanying Ding, Yue Shang, Mengwen Liu, Yuan Ling, Bo Song, and Yizhou Zang for all the help and support they provided. Special thanks to Chunyu Zhao, Yujia Wang, and Weilun Cheng. iii Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES ............................................. vii LIST OF FIGURES ............................................. ix ABSTRACT ................................................ x 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................ 1 1.1 Overview ............................................. 2 2. CLASSICAL TOPIC MODELING METHODS ............................. 4 2.0.1 Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA)............................... 4 2.0.2 PLSA ............................................. 5 2.1 Latent Dirichlet Allocation.................................... 6 3. PAIRWISE TOPIC MODEL ...................................... 8 3.1 Pairwise Relation
    [Show full text]