Brunswick River Catchment Social Values Study
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Brunswick River Catchment Social Values Study Prepared for the Department of Water By Beckwith Environmental Planning Pty Ltd April 2010 Acknowledgements The study team would like to thank all of the stakeholders who generously agreed to meet and share their knowledge of the Brunswick River catchment with us. We would like to acknowledge the Department of Water for providing assistance and funds to complete the study. In particular, we would like to thank Mike McKenna and Brendan Kelly. Sincerely, Jo Ann Beckwith PhD Director Beckwith Environmental Planning Pty Ltd www.beckwith-environmental-planning.com Limitations Beckwith Environmental Planning Pty Ltd has prepared this report for the use of the Department of Water in accordance with the usual care and thoroughness of the consulting profession. It is based on generally accepted practices and standards at the time it was prepared. The methodology adopted and sources of information used by Beckwith Environmental Planning Pty Ltd are outlined in this report. This report is based on the conditions encountered and information reviewed at the time of preparation. Beckwith Environmental Planning Pty Ltd disclaims responsibility for any changes that may have occurred after this time. No responsibility is accepted for use of any part of this report in any other context or for any other purpose or by third parties. Report Authorship This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of the Department of Water, and is subject to and issued in accordance with the agreed terms and scope between the Department of Water and Beckwith Environmental Planning Pty Ltd. © Copyright 2010 Beckwith Environmental Planning Pty Ltd This report has been prepared by Beckwith Environmental Planning for the Department of Water. This project is jointly funded by the Department of Water Western Australia and the Australian Government’s $12.9 billion Water for the Future initiative. ISBN: 978-0-9806440-3-6 Brunswick River Catchment Social Values Study 2010 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background The headwaters of the Brunswick River start on the Darling Scarp north west of Collie. From there the river flows westward passing through Brunswick Junction before moving southward as it nears Australind and finally discharges into the Collie River. The main tributary of the Brunswick River is the Wellesley River. Other tributaries are the Ernest, Augustus, Frederic and Lunenburgh Rivers and Elvira Gully. The 228 km2 catchment is situated primarily within the Shire of Harvey, with a small portion in the Shire of Collie. The Brunswick River is the only fresh tributary to the salinity affected Collie River. The Department of Water (DoW) is the lead State Government agency responsible for water resource management planning in Western Australia (WA). The DoW is undertaking a number of activities to support water management in the Brunswick River catchment including the establishment of ecological water requirements. Study objectives The DoW’s water resource management activities are guided by Statewide Policy No 5 Environmental Water Provisions Policy for Western Australia (WRC 2000). The policy describes WA’s water allocation planning framework, which takes into account not only ecological but also social and economic values. In the water planning framework, social values are limited to non- consumptive social values. This includes Aboriginal and other Australian heritage, recreational and tourist pursuits, landscape and aesthetic aspects, and educational and scientific aspects (WRC 2000a). This report documents the non-consumptive in situ surface water-dependent social values of the Brunswick River catchment. The study objectives were to identify: (1) locations/features with social values, their characteristics and the water conditions to support these values; (2) locations where restoration works are needed; and (3) the consultation required before restoration works can commence. Social values: • Despite its size and proximity to Bunbury, the Brunswick River system currently has limited non-consumptive in situ social values. This is largely due to a lack of formal public access points. • The most notable exception is the Brunswick River Pool near the Brunswick Junction town site. The pool is a popular recreation spot (e.g. swimming, fishing, marroning) that reaches capacity (e.g. up to 100 people on weekends) in summer but is used year round by local residents. Water management considerations: • For sites where specific SWRs (e.g. the Brunswick River Pool) were identified, stakeholders indicated that the existing water conditions are sufficient to support the existing social values. In general, water conditions that met ecological needs were deemed by stakeholders as also adequate to support associated social values. • For sites where specific SWRs were identified (e.g. the Brunswick River Pool), stakeholders indicated that the existing water conditions are sufficient to support the existing social values. ii Brunswick River Catchment Social Values Study 2010 In general, water conditions that met ecological needs were deemed by stakeholders as also adequate to support associated social values. • The Brunswick River Pool is the most important feature with social value on the river system and there is considerable value in maintaining or improving, the condition of this feature. • The establishment of a major new dam on the Brunswick River would significantly diminish the existing social values, including its value as a mythological site of significance to the Noongar community. • The social values of the river system could be enhanced by the establishment of several formal public access points. Any decision to establish formal public access points to enhance social values would need to be weighed against economic and environmental considerations. River restoration: • All stakeholders recognised that some parts of the river system have become degraded over time due to land use activities, engineering modifications and general use of the river. They strongly supported restoring degraded areas to protect the ecological values and health of the river system. • The most commonly requested restoration activities were bank stabilisation to prevent erosion and sediment build-up and weed removal. • In addition to general comments about the need for restoration works, about one third of the interviewees identified specific sites and/or areas in need of restoration. The most frequently identified was the Brunswick River Pool. • The DoW recognises the importance of engaging with Noongar stakeholders before undertaking restoration activities. This was supported and encouraged by Noongar stakeholders during the study. iii Brunswick River Catchment Social Values Study 2010 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study objective ................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Study area ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Definition of social values ................................................................................................ 2 1.5 Social water requirements ............................................................................................... 3 Chapter 2 Methods ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Social value descriptors ................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Desktop analysis ............................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Engagement with Noongar stakeholders ....................................................................... 7 2.4 Engagement with other stakeholders ............................................................................. 9 2.5 Site visits ........................................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 3 Social Values .............................................................................................................. 10 3.1 Public access as a limiting factor ................................................................................... 10 3.2 Brunswick River Pool ..................................................................................................... 10 3.3 Moonlight Pool and Treasure Bridge ............................................................................ 13 3.4 Beela Dam ....................................................................................................................... 14 3.5 Fishing and marroning ................................................................................................... 14 3.6 Camping and hunting ..................................................................................................... 16 3.7 Education values............................................................................................................. 16 3.8 Heritage values ............................................................................................................... 16 Chapter 4