Constitutional Monarchy in the Caribbean
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Who Is Queen Elizabeth II?
Who is Queen Elizabeth II? Elizabeth Alexandra Mary, later to become Queen Elizabeth II, was born on 21 April 1926 in Mayfair, London. She was the first child of The Duke and Duchess of York, who later became King George VI and Queen Elizabeth. The Queen’s birthday is officially celebrated in Britain on the second Saturday of June each year. This special day is referred to as ‘The Trooping of the Colour’. The Queen is also known as the British Sovereign. Trooping of the Colour Elizabeth’s Family In 1936, King Edward VIII stepped down from the throne. Elizabeth’s father was crowned King George VI. Her mother became Queen Elizabeth, and Elizabeth and her sister Margaret were now Princesses. Elizabeth’s Childhood Princess Elizabeth was taught at home, not at school. • She studied art and music and enjoyed drama and swimming. • When she was 11, she joined the Girl Guides. • Elizabeth undertook her first public engagement on her 16th birthday, when she inspected the soldiers of the Grenadier Guards. The Royal Family Elizabeth got married in Westminster Abbey on 20th November 1947, when she was 21 years old. Her husband Prince Philip, also known as the Duke of Edinburgh, was the son of Prince Andrew of Greece. In 1948, the Queen’s first child Prince Charles was born. Two years later Princess Anne was born. Elizabeth would go on to have two more children, Prince Andrew and Prince Edward in 1960 and 1964. Elizabeth Becomes Queen In 1952, when she was just 25, Elizabeth’s father King George VI died. -
FOI Letter Template
Royal, Ceremonial & Honours Unit Protocol Directorate Foreign and Commonwealth Office King Charles Street London SW1A 2AH Website: https://www.gov.uk 22 February 2016 Dear FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000 REQUEST REF: 0082-16 Thank you for your email of 23 January asking for information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 2000. You asked: “I would be pleased to receive information and correspondence held by the FCO between and within the offices of FCO ministers, FCO protocol and Royal matters unit department concerning the rules and regulations pertaining to the use of titles of honour, such as knighthoods, granted by The Queen or her official representatives in right of another Commonwealth Realm, to UK and dual nationals of the Queen’s Commonwealth realms, any correspondence on the changing of such rules and regulations for UK nationals and dual UK nationals who are also a national of another Commonwealth Realm.” We can confirm that the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) does hold information relevant to your request. Some of the information that we hold which is relevant to your request is, in our view, already reasonably accessible to you. Under section 21 of the Act, we are not required to provide information in response to a request if it is already reasonably accessible to the applicant. Responses to Parliamentary Questions on this subject are available to view at www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written- questions-answers using the keyword “knighthoods”. However, other information and correspondence on the use of titles of honours has been withheld as it is exempt under section 37(1)(a) of the Freedom of Information Act (FOI) – communications with, or on behalf of, the Sovereign. -
United Kingdom - Queen Elizabeth II” of the National Security Adviser’S Presidential Correspondence with Foreign Leaders Collection at the Gerald R
The original documents are located in Box 5, folder “United Kingdom - Queen Elizabeth II” of the National Security Adviser’s Presidential Correspondence with Foreign Leaders Collection at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 5 of the NSA Presidential Correspondence with Foreign Leaders Collection at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library I~ ·! ! ,_ I! THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON ! I .i May 27, 1975 Your Majesty: . ; ' ' On behalf of the people of the United States of America, it gives me great pleasure to extend to you and to the Duke of Edinburgh a cordial invitation to make a State Visit to the United States on July 7 to 11, 1976, on the I I occasion of our 200th anniversary celebrations. I i Your visit, I know, will serve to underscore the very I close ties of friendship which unite our peoples. There could be no more fitting observance of this friendship on this iniportant occasion ti-.a.a.n a visit by Your ~.. -
Why Did Britain Become a Republic? > New Government
Civil War > Why did Britain become a republic? > New government Why did Britain become a republic? Case study 2: New government Even today many people are not aware that Britain was ever a republic. After Charles I was put to death in 1649, a monarch no longer led the country. Instead people dreamed up ideas and made plans for a different form of government. Find out more from these documents about what happened next. Report on the An account of the Poem on the arrest of setting up of the new situation in Levellers, 1649 Commonwealth England, 1649 Portrait & symbols of Cromwell at the The setting up of Cromwell & the Battle of the Instrument Commonwealth Worcester, 1651 of Government http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/ Page 1 Civil War > Why did Britain become a republic? > New government Case study 2: New government - Source 1 A report on the arrest of some Levellers, 29 March 1649 (Catalogue ref: SP 25/62, pp.134-5) What is this source? This is a report from a committee of MPs to Parliament. It explains their actions against the leaders of the Levellers. One of the men they arrested was John Lilburne, a key figure in the Leveller movement. What’s the background to this source? Before the war of the 1640s it was difficult and dangerous to come up with new ideas and try to publish them. However, during the Civil War censorship was not strongly enforced. Many political groups emerged with new ideas at this time. One of the most radical (extreme) groups was the Levellers. -
The Executive Power Clause
ARTICLE THE EXECUTIVE POWER CLAUSE JULIAN DAVIS MORTENSON† Article II of the Constitution vests “the executive power” in the President. Advocates of presidential power have long claimed that this phrase was originally understood as a term of art for the full suite of powers held by a typical eighteenth- century monarch. In its strongest form, this view yields a powerful presumption of indefeasible presidential authority in the arenas of foreign affairs and national security. This so-called Vesting Clause Thesis is conventional wisdom among constitutional originalists. But it is also demonstrably wrong. Based on a comprehensive review of Founding-era archives—including records of drafting, legislative, and ratication debates, committee les, private and ocial correspondence, diaries, newspapers, pamphlets, poetry, and other publications—this Article not only refutes the Vesting Clause Thesis as a statement of the original understanding, but replaces it with a comprehensive armative account of the clause that is both historically and theoretically coherent. † James G. Phillipp Professor of law, University of Michigan. Thanks to Nick Bagley, Josh Chafetz, Reece Dameron, Jo Ann Davis, Brian Finucane, Louis Fisher, David Gerson, Jonathan Gienapp, Monica Hakimi, Jason Hart, Don Herzog, Kian Hudson, Daniel Hulsebosch, Rebecca Ingber, Andrew Kent, Gary Lawson, Marty Lederman, Tom McSweeney, Henry Monaghan, Bill Novak, David Pozen, Richard Primus, Daphna Renan, Jed Shugerman, Matt Steilen, Valentina Vadi, Matt Waxman, John Witt, Ilan Wurman, and Mariah Zeisberg, as well as participants in the Georgetown Law School Legal History Workshop, the Hofstra Law School Faculty Workshop, the Hugh & Hazel Darling Originalism Works-in-Progress Conference, the McGeorge School of Law Faculty Workshop, the Michigan Law School Governance Workshop, the University of Michigan Legal History Workshop, and the University of Michigan Atlantic History Seminar, for helpful comments on earlier drafts. -
Staging Power in Tudor and Stuart English History Plays: History, Political Thought, and the Redefinition of Sovereignity Kristin M.S
University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Bookshelf 2015 Staging Power in Tudor and Stuart English History Plays: History, Political Thought, and the Redefinition of Sovereignity Kristin M.S. Bezio University of Richmond, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/bookshelf Part of the Leadership Studies Commons Recommended Citation Bezio, Kristin M.S. Staging Power in Tudor and Stuart English History Plays: History, Political Thought, and the Redefinition of Sovereignty. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2015. NOTE: This PDF preview of Staging Power in Tudor and Stuart English History Plays: History, Political Thought, and the Redefinition of Sovereignity includes only the preface and/or introduction. To purchase the full text, please click here. This Book is brought to you for free and open access by UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bookshelf by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Staging Power in Tudor and Stuart English History Plays History, Political Thought, and the Redefinition of Sovereignty KRISTIN M.S. BEZIO University ofRichmond, USA LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND VIRGINIA 23173 ASHGATE Introduction Of Parliaments and Kings: The Origins of Monarchy and the Sovereign-Subject Compact in the English Middle Ages (to 1400) The purpose of this study is to examine the intersection between early modem political thought, the history that produced the late Tudor and early Stuart monarchies, and the critical interrogation of both taking place on the public theatrical stage. The plays I examine here are those which rely on chronicle histories for their source materials; are set in England, Scotland, or Wales; focus primarily on governance and sovereignty; and whose interest in history is didactic and actively political. -
What Goes up Must Come Down: Integrating Air and Water Quality Monitoring for Nutrients Helen M Amos, Chelcy Miniat, Jason A
Subscriber access provided by NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CTR Feature What Goes Up Must Come Down: Integrating Air and Water Quality Monitoring for Nutrients Helen M Amos, Chelcy Miniat, Jason A. Lynch, Jana E. Compton, Pamela Templer, Lori Sprague, Denice Marie Shaw, Douglas A. Burns, Anne W. Rea, David R Whitall, Myles Latoya, David Gay, Mark Nilles, John T. Walker, Anita Rose, Jerad Bales, Jeffery Deacon, and Richard Pouyat Environ. Sci. Technol., Just Accepted Manuscript • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b03504 • Publication Date (Web): 19 Sep 2018 Downloaded from http://pubs.acs.org on September 21, 2018 Just Accepted “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication. They are posted online prior to technical editing, formatting for publication and author proofing. The American Chemical Society provides “Just Accepted” as a service to the research community to expedite the dissemination of scientific material as soon as possible after acceptance. “Just Accepted” manuscripts appear in full in PDF format accompanied by an HTML abstract. “Just Accepted” manuscripts have been fully peer reviewed, but should not be considered the official version of record. They are citable by the Digital Object Identifier (DOI®). “Just Accepted” is an optional service offered to authors. Therefore, the “Just Accepted” Web site may not include all articles that will be published in the journal. After a manuscript is technically edited and formatted, it will be removed from the “Just Accepted” Web site and published as an ASAP article. Note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the manuscript text and/or graphics which could affect content, and all legal disclaimers and ethical guidelines that apply to the journal pertain. -
Oral Poetry As Channel for Communication
ISSN 1712-8358[Print] Cross-Cultural Communication ISSN 1923-6700[Online] Vol. 8, No. 4, 2012, pp. 20-23 www.cscanada.net DOI:10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020120804.365 www.cscanada.org Oral Poetry as Channel for Communication A. Anthony Obaje[a],*; Bola Olajide Yakubu[b] [a] Department of English and Literary Studies, Faculty of Arts and from one generation to another. It is also called African Humanities, Kogi State University, Anyigba, Nigeria. traditional poetry whose modus operandi is collective [b] Department of Theatre Arts, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Kogi State University, Anyigba, Nigeria. participation. It can be described as a collective experience *Corresponding author. that is initiated by an individual in a group and shared by the rest of the group; it is a common heritage shared by all Received 1 June 2012; accepted 5 August 2012 and handed over from one generation to another. African oral poetry was not meant traditionally for a few or a Abstract particular group, but for the entirety of the community. It African village traditionally was a small unit where is the culture, heritage and pride of a particular African every inhabitant knew and was interested in the affair society where such oral poetry is created and performed. of his neighbor. This common heritage produces poems In other words it is not the property of a few bards, but passed on by words of mouth from one generation to the entire society. This is because, oral poetry is created another. This paper discusses the transmission of African and effectively used to create the desired atmosphere and socio-cultural values from one generation to another evoke the appropriate emotion as conditioned by occasion through oral poetry. -
Great Britain Amelia, Orla, Alina, and Mohamed OVERVIEW
Great Britain Amelia, Orla, Alina, and Mohamed OVERVIEW The United Kingdom has historically played a leading role in developing parliamentary democracy and in advancing literature and science. Capital: London Type of Government: Parliamentary constitutional monarchy 1 of 5 permanent members of the UN Security Council and founding member of NATO + the Commonwealth. (Pursues a global approach to foreign policy). GOVERNMENT . Constitution The UK has an unwritten constitution that consists partly of statutes and partly common law and practices Amendments: -Amendments must be proposed as a bill for an Act of Parliament by the government, the House of Commons, or by the House of Lords -to pass an amendment, it must be approved by both houses and by the monarch Executive Branch Chief of State: Queen Elizabeth II (since 2/6/52); Heir Apparent Prince Charles Head of Government: Prime Minister Boris Johnson (Conservative) (since 7/24/19) Cabinet: appointed by Prime Minister Elections/appointments: the monarchy is hereditary; following legislative elections, the leader of the majority party or majority coalition usually becomes the prime minister; election last held on 8 June 2017 (next to be held by 5 May 2022) note: in addition to serving as the UK head of state, the British sovereign is the constitutional monarch for 15 additional Commonwealth countries (these 16 states are each referred to as a Commonwealth realm) Legislative Bicameral Parliament: House of Lords and House of Commons House of Commons -Percent of vote by party House of Lords -No elections -92 hereditary peers Judicial Supreme Court -judge candidates selected by an independent committee of several judicial commissions, followed by their recommendations to the prime minister, and appointed by the monarch -justices serve for life Administrative Divisions . -
Contextual Information Timelines and Family Trees Tudors to Windsors: British Royal Portraits 16 March – 14 July 2019
16 March — 14 July 2019 British Royal Portraits Exhibition organised by the National Portrait Gallery, London Contextual Information Timelines and Family Trees Tudors to Windsors: British Royal Portraits 16 March – 14 July 2019 Tudors to Windsors traces the history of the British monarchy through the outstanding collection of the National Portrait Gallery, London. This exhibition highlights major events in British (and world) history from the sixteenth century to the present, examining the ways in which royal portraits were impacted by both the personalities of individual monarchs and wider historical change. Presenting some of the most significant royal portraits, the exhibition will explore five royal dynasties: the Tudors, the Stuarts, the Georgians, the Victorians and the Windsors shedding light on key figures and important historical moments. This exhibition also offers insight into the development of British art including works by the most important artists to have worked in Britain, from Sir Peter Lely and Sir Godfrey Kneller to Cecil Beaton and Annie Leibovitz. 2 UK WORLDWIDE 1485 Henry Tudor defeats Richard III at the Battle of Bosworth Field, becoming King Henry VII The Tudors and founding the Tudor dynasty 1492 An expedition led by Italian explorer Christopher Columbus encounters the Americas 1509 while searching for a Western passage to Asia Henry VII dies and is succeeded Introduction by King Henry VIII 1510 The Inca abandon the settlement of Machu Picchu in modern day Peru Between 1485 and 1603, England was ruled by 1517 Martin Luther nails his 95 theses to the five Tudor monarchs. From King Henry VII who won the door of the Castle Church in Wittenberg, crown in battle, to King Henry VIII with his six wives and a catalyst for the Protestant Reformation 1519 Elizabeth I, England’s ‘Virgin Queen’, the Tudors are some Hernando Cortes lands on of the most familiar figures in British history. -
CAN WORDS PRODUCE ORDER? Regicide in the Confucian Tradition
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Lirias CAN WORDS PRODUCE ORDER? Regicide in the Confucian Tradition CARINE DEFOORT KU Leuven, Belgium ᭛ ABSTRACT This article presents and evaluates a dominant traditional Chinese trust in language as an efficient tool to promote social and political order. It focuses on the term shi (regicide or parricide) in the Annals (Chunqiu). This is not only the oldest text (from 722–481 BCE) regularly using this term, but its choice of words has also been considered the oldest and most exemplary instance of the normative power of language. A close study of its uses of ‘regi- cide’ leads to a position between the traditional ‘praise and blame’ theory and its extreme negation. Later commentaries on the Annals and reflection on regicide in other texts, in different ways, attest to a growing reliance or belief in the power of words in the political realm. Key Words ᭛ Annals (Chunqiu) ᭛ China ᭛ language ᭛ order ᭛ regicide Two prominent scholars hold a debate in front of Emperor Jing (156–41 BCE). One of them is Master Huang, a follower of Huang Lao and the teachings of ‘The Yellow Emperor and Laozi’. The other is Master Yuan Gu, a specialist in the Book of Odes and appointed as erudite at the court of Emperor Jing. Master Huang launches the discussion with the provoca- tive claim that Tang and Wu, the founding fathers of China’s two exem- plary dynasties, respectively the Shang (18th–11th century) and Zhou (11th–3rd century) dynasties, were guilty of regicide against Jie and Zhòu, the last kings of the preceding dynasties. -
Operation London Bridge 2020
SHOTLEY PARISH COUNCIL PROTOCOL FOR MARKING THE DEATH OF A SENIOR NATIONAL FIGURE OPERATION LONDON BRIDGE CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Protocol 2.1 Implementation of Protocol 3. Flag Flying 4. Proclamation Day Schedule 4.1 Proclamation Day 4.2 Proclamation Day Protocol 5. Books of Condolence 5.1 Online Book of Condolence 6. Events During the Period of Mourning 7. Church Services 8. Flowers 9. Dress Code 10. Marking a Silence 11. Website 12. Letters of Condolence Action Grids Appendices 1. INTRODUCTION These guidance notes have been produced from those issued by the National Association of Civic Officers (NACO). They set out the protocols to which local Councils should follow and observe on marking the death of a senior national figure and to be observed on the death of the Sovereign, which involves the greatest number of ceremonial elements. From this template, it is possible to select elements that are appropriate when marking the death of, for instance, another member of the Royal Family, a Prime Minister or former Prime Minister, a serving Member of Parliament. All parts of this protocol apply on the death of the Sovereign (and, of course, those sections around the Accession Proclamation arise only on the Monarch’s death). Beyond that, implementation of the Protocol is a matter to be decided locally. This protocol offers guidance on how to mark a death. It is down to the Parish Chairman and Parish Clerk to decide for whom the protocol is implemented and to what extent. Flying of flag at half-mast will always be appropriate. Other decisions,