Halloweenbrexit?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Halloweenbrexit? Make Your Mark Spring 2019 HALLOWEEN BREXIT? IN THIS ISSUE Trade marks and designs EUROPEAN with a Brexit deal PERSPECTIVES Article 126 of the Withdrawal Agreement • Halloween Brexit? Page 1-2 provides for a “transition” period from when • Should we shoot the UK exits the EU until 31 December the messenger? Pages 3-4 2020. During this period, EU law will continue to apply to the UK. • Monkey business Pages 4-5 UK NEWS Registered EUTMs and RCDs • Snippets Pages 6-25 After the transition period, owners of At the time of writing, the EUTMs and RCDs granted before the end UK COURT DIARY bewildering journey of Brexit of the transition period will “without any • Come fly with me: is ongoing. Several rounds of re-examination, become the holder of a High Court engages rejections and extensions have comparable registered and enforceable “intention to target” occurred since we last wrote about right in the UK” (art.54 of the Withdrawal approach in Britain’s exit from the European Agreement). jurisdictional Union (EU) in the Autumn issue of challenge Pages 26-27 Make Your Mark, culminating in a Pending applications • Horny trade mark special meeting of the European Assuming a deal is struck and the transition dilemma Pages 28-29 Council, at which a longer flexible period is agreed, applicants can (and extension was agreed. • A spoonful of should) continue to file EUTM, international aggressive behaviour As a result, exit day is now defined as (EU) and RCD applications as usual until does not help 11pm on 31 October 2019. However, at least 31 December 2019. Based on pre-action disclosure if both the European Commission and the EUIPO’s speed of registration, the go down Pages 30-31 the UK ratify the Withdrawal Agreement majority of routine applications filed by that before 31 October 2019, then Brexit will date should have been granted before ABOUT OUR FIRM Page 32 take place on the first day of the month the transition period expires and will following the date of ratification, and automatically convert into equivalent UK the extension will be terminated. Also, registrations. The owner of a EUTM or RCD there’s a chance that the Government still pending at the end of the transitional might decide to call the whole thing period (December 2020) will be entitled off, as the UK has a right to revoke its to file a corresponding UK application notification under Article 50 at any time within nine months from the end of the and cancel Brexit altogether. transition period—i.e. to September 2021 (Withdrawal Agreement art.59.1). This new UK application will retain the filing date of the EUTM (and priority date if applicable). Maucher Jenkins encompasses UK, German and European Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys, Attorneys-at-Law and IP Litigators. Maucher Jenkins is the joint trading name of RGC Jenkins & Co in the UK (regulated by IPReg) and Maucher Jenkins Patentanwälte & Rechtsanwälte in Germany. ©2018 Maucher Jenkins® International registrations (IRs) which will come into force at the point of UK, EU and third-country designers will the UK’s exit from the EU. It added that be provided with continued protection The UK Government will arrange a system the new UK right will be provided with for those designs first disclosed in EU27 with WIPO to allow EU designations of IRs “minimal administrative burden”. There is Member States and already protected by to be converted into, or re-registered as, no confirmation that this will not involve an unregistered Community design right at national UKTM registrations, retaining their payment of a fee. the point that the UK exits the EU “with no original filing or priority date. IRs specifically action required by the right holder”. designating the UK will be unaffected by Right holders will be notified that a new the UK leaving the EU. UK right has been granted; any business, Through the new supplementary organisation or individual that does not unregistered design right, designs which Those who have obtained protection for want to receive a new comparable UK are disclosed in the UK after the UK international registrations of trade marks registered trade mark or design will be able exits the EU will be protected in the UK or designs designating the EU before the to opt out. under the current terms of the UCD end of the transition period will continue (which means that protection for surface to enjoy protection for those international Pending EUTMs and RCDs decoration will be available). trade marks and designs after the Applicants will have a period of nine transition period (art.56 of the Withdrawal Representation at the EUIPO months from the date of exit to re-file with Agreement). the UK IPO under the same terms for As an Anglo-German firm with a long- Unregistered design right a UK equivalent right, using the normal standing presence in London and Munich, application process for registered trade Maucher Jenkins is aptly placed to Holders of unregistered Community marks and registered designs in the UK represent our clients before the EUIPO design (UCD) rights that arose before the but retaining the date of the EU application both now and following Brexit, in whatever end of the transition period will become for priority purposes. shape it may take. Our professionals are owners of corresponding rights in the ideally suited to represent our clients’ UK (with the “same level of protection” Applicants with pending EUTM or RCD interests in the UK, Germany and as the corresponding UCD) after the applications will not be notified and after throughout the EU. Our UK, Irish and transition period (art.57 of the Withdrawal exit will need to consider whether they German lawyers are experienced in Agreement). re-file with the UK IPO in order to obtain EUTM and RCD matters, as well as in protection in the UK. Re-filing will incur a contentious, advisory and IP contractual Trade Marks and Designs with standard trade mark filing fee. no Brexit Deal matters, and will retain rights of Unregistered design right representation before the EUIPO after In the event of no deal, there will be no any Brexit. transition period. UCD rights protect a range of design features including two- and three- Our German Patentanwälte regularly act International registrations dimensional aspects such as surface before the EUIPO and will also retain these The UK signed up to the Hague System for decoration and product shape. The UCD rights. the International Registration of Industrial provides three years of protection from the Our UK Chartered Trade Mark Attorneys Designs on 13 June 2018, so applicants date that the design is first made available and Patent Attorneys are among the most for international design registrations can to the public (“disclosed”) within the EU. trusted and knowledgeable in the industry designate the UK. The UCD is entirely separate from the and our clients’ cloned or re-filed EUTM UK’s own unregistered design right, which and RCD rights will come to a safe UK Registered EUTMs and RCDs protects product shape and configuration landing in their hands. Under the proposed For existing registered EUTMs and RCDs, but cannot protect any form of surface transition arrangements, they may also the UK Government has said that it will decoration. The UK unregistered design continue to act directly in respect of any provide a new equivalent trade mark or right will continue to exist for designs first EUIPO matters still pending during any design right registered in the UK, disclosed in the UK. transition period. Page 2 SHOULD WE SHOOT THE MESSENGER? EUROPEAN EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVES Brand owners policing the internet Kicking up a stink In the past, there have been comparable are alive to instances of trade mark cases of possible intellectual property The defendant, Amazon, facilitates sales infringement, including on third-party infringements through online providers, agreements between third party suppliers internet platforms such as Amazon where those agents only acted as a and buyers in such a way that it optionally and eBay. Back in 2016, Coty sought platform between the buyer and the takes care of the stocking and shipping to prevent retailers and distributors infringing third party distributor. The of goods through the service “shipping from selling its luxury brands through question of the platform’s responsibility via Amazon”. The plaintiff, Coty, is a Amazon, as it preferred to control is by no means fully resolved. However, licensed distributor of the EU trade mark sales in high-end bricks-and-mortar one can make out a tendency to DAVIDOFF 0876874. Coty acquired a shops. The luxury brand industry disburden these platforms from control bottle of “Davidoff Hot Water Edt 60 ml” breathed a sigh of relief when the responsibilities. The courts of first (LG via a test purchase, which turned out to Court of Justice of the European München I, Urteil vom 19.01.2016 – 33 O infringe trade mark rights. It requested that Union (CJEU) ruled that the restriction 23145/14) and second (OLG München, Amazon hand over all remaining goods did not breach competition laws, as Urteil vom 22.03.2017 – 29 U 745/16) and inform Coty about the third party long as it did not discriminate against instances in Germany did not follow Coty suppliers. Amazon handed over 30 bottles particular resellers. in its view that Amazon’s responsibility of perfume, but claimed it could no longer for its business model encompasses retrace the source and therefore was not the accountability for third-party sellers’ able to disclose further details. unlicensed goods. The question and its relevance Strictly speaking, it is correct that a The tricky part is that Amazon itself is not violating action by Amazon is hard to party to the sales contract.
Recommended publications
  • Colour Trade Marks: Whiskas Purple Will Be Successfully Registered After a Cat Fight in the Federal Court
    Colour Trade Marks: Whiskas purple will be successfully registered after a cat fight in the Federal Court By Alexia Marinos, Senior Associate of Gadens Lawyers, Sydney www.gadens.com.au Following the landmark decision to allow Cadbury to register five shades of purple as trade marks for its chocolate packaging after a ten year dispute with Darrell Lea, brand owners are rushing to secure their colour trade mark registrations. Wedgewood Limited owns blue for ceramics and porcelain, Telstra has trade marked its yellow phonebooks, Australian Postal Corporation owns yellow for mail delivery services and Kraft Foods Limited owns silver for cream cheese. Mars Australia Pty Ltd (Mars) recently won a battle in the Federal Court against Societe de Produits Nestle SA (Nestle) to secure trade mark protection for its customised shade of purple (known as the Whiskas Purple) for its cat food packaging. Nestle successfully opposed the application in the Trade Marks Office, however, Mars appealed the decision of the Delegate of Registrar of Trade Marks to the Federal Court of Australia and was successful after Nestle dropped its opposition in the final stages of the Appeal. It’s believed that Nestle struck a deal with Mars to allow them to continue to use purple on their Purina brand cat food. The case Mars, the owner of the popular cat food Whiskas had used its Whiskas Purple colour on its cat food packaging and marketing materials since 2000. In November 2002, Mars applied for trade mark protection for its Whiskas Purple. The application was accepted for registration; however, Nestle opposed the application.
    [Show full text]
  • Heraldry for Beginners
    The Heraldry Society Educational Charity No: 241456 HERALDRY Beasts, Banners & Badges FOR BEGINNERS Heraldry is a noble science and a fascinating hobby – but essentially it is FUN! J. P. Brooke-Little, Richmond Herald, 1970 www.theheraldrysociety.com The Chairman and Council of the Heraldry Society are indebted to all those who have made this publication possible October 2016 About Us he Heraldry Society was founded in 1947 by John P. Brooke-Little, CVO, KStJ, FSA, FSH, the Tthen Bluemantle Pursuivant of Arms and ultimately, in 1995, Clarenceux King of Arms. In 1956 the Society was incorporated under the Companies Act (1948). By Letters Patent dated 10th August 1957 the Society was granted Armorial Bearings. e Society is both a registered non-prot making company and an educational charity. Our aims The To promote and encourage the study and knowledge of, and to foster and extend interest in, the Heraldry Society science of heraldry, armory, chivalry, precedence, ceremonial, genealogy, family history and all kindred subjects and disciplines. Our activities include Seasonal monthly meetings and lectures Organising a bookstall at all our meetings Publishing a popular newsletter, The Heraldry Gazette, and a more scholarly journal, The Coat of Arms In alternate years, oering a residential Congress with speakers and conducted visits Building and maintaining a heraldry archive Hosting an informative website Supporting regional Societies’ initiatives Our Membership Is inclusive and open to all A prior knowledge of heraldry is not a prerequisite to membership, John Brooke-Little nor is it necessary for members to possess their own arms. e Chairman and Council of the Heraldry Society The Society gratefully acknowledges the owners and holders of copyright in the graphics and images included in this publication which may be reproduced solely for educational purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Heraldic Device Consultation Sheet (PLEASE PRINT)
    Heraldic Device Consultation Sheet (PLEASE PRINT) Client/Submitter Information Legal name: Address: City/State/Zip: Phone (Best Contact): ( Home, Cell, Work) E-mail: Gender: M F Date of birth: Do you have a registered name? Y N If yes, list: Do you have a profile established on Northshield.org? Y N Device Badge New Change Resubmission Date of Return: Reason for Return: Other (specify): _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Local Group Name: Local herald: MDA: Consulting herald: MDA: Consultant’s Phone (Best Contact): ( Home, Cell, Work) Consultant’s E-mail: Client File Notes (for consulting herald use only): SCA Name (existing or proposed): New (with device submission) Already Registered - When and in what kingdom: In Process - When and in what kingdom: Heraldic Design: What is your favorite number and why? There are three tincture classifications: 1) colors, 2) metals and 3) furs. There are five colors: Azure (blue), Gules (red), Purpure (purple), Sable (black) and Vert (green). There are two metals: Argent (silver or white) and Or (gold or yellow). There are two basic fur types, of which there are color/metal variations: Ermine fur (metals with color spots & colors with metal spots) Vair fur (bell shaped quadrants composed of equal parts color and metal). METALS (Pick 1) COLORS (Pick 1 to 3) FURS (Pick 0 to 2) Argent (white) Azure (blue) Ermine (white/black spots) Vair (blue/white bell shapes) Or (yellow) Gules (red) Erminois (yellow/black spots) Vair variant (specify colors) Purpure (purple) Counter-ermine (black/white spots) Potent (blue/white “T”shapes) Sable (black) Pean (black/yellow spots) Potent Variant (specify colors) Vert (green) Ermine variant (specify colors) Ermine Counter Ermine Erminois Paen Vair Counter Vair Potent Counter Potent Charges (Objects client is interested in): Select up to three from each following category and list them below.
    [Show full text]
  • Heraldry. School Books Published by Whittaker & Co., a Ve Maria Lane
    ~ .. .. HERALDRY. SCHOOL BOOKS PUBLISHED BY WHITTAKER & CO., A VE MARIA LANE. 8 ANTHON'$ VIRGIL, adapted for the use of English Schools. • d. By the Rev. F. METCALFE. With Notes. l2mo. cloth 7 6 A YRE'S Young Ladies' Arithmetic. 18rno. sewed 2 O BEASLEY'S Dictation Exercises. 18mo. cloth • • . 2 O BELL ENG ER'S French Conversations. New edit. 12mo. cl. 2 6 BOYER and DELETANVILLE'S Complete French Dic- tionary. New edition. 8vo. bound . • 12 0 BROWNING'S History of the Huguenots. Svo. sewed . 6 O BUTTMAN'S (Dr. P.) Intermediate or Larger Greek Gram- . mar. New edit. By Dr. CHARLES SuPF. !!vo. cloth 12 o CAESARIS (J.) Ct>mmentarii de Bello Gailico. With Notes, Preface, Introduction, &c. By G. LONG, E sq. M.A. 12mo. cloth . 5 6 CAMP AN'S (Madame) Conversations in French and English. New edition. 12mo. cloth . 3 6 ---------------in German and English. l2mo. cloth • . 4 O CHEPMELL'S (Rev. H. Le M.) Course of History. First Series. I 2mo. cloth . • . 5 0 --------------- Second Series, in the Press. CICERO'S Minor Works. De Officiis, &c. &c. With English Notes, by W. C. TAYLOR, LL.D. 12mo. cloth . 4 6 CICERO de Amicitia, de Senectute, &c. With Notes, &c. , by G. Loi-G, Esq., M.A., Trin. Coll. Cambridge. l2mo. cl. 4 6 COMSTOCK'S System of Natural Philosophy. New edition, by LEES. 18rno. bound . • 3 6 DUNCAN'S English Expositor. 24th edition. 12mo. cloth . 1 6 FLUGEL'S German and English, and English and German Dictionary. ·with numerous alterations and corrections. New edition. 2 vols.
    [Show full text]
  • Smith Kline & French Laboratories V Sterling-Winthrop Group Ltd [I9761 RPC 51 1; Cf Smith Kline & French Laboratories V Registrar of Trade Marks [I9671 CLR 628
    THENEW FORMS OF REGISTRABLEMARKS: MARKETUPTAKE IN THE FIRST FIVEYEARS BRUCECLARKE* AND STEVEKAPNOULLAS ** The Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) has now been in operation for five years, enough time to sit back and absorb some of the ramifications following its introduction on 1 January 1996. Undoubtedly one of the most publicised issues at the time of the Act being introduced related to the extended definition given to the term 'trade mark', so much so that the matter was widely canvassed in the popular press of the day. The interest generated related to the fact that shapes (including aspects of packaging), colours, sounds and scents were now eligible to be registered as trade marks, although it has to be said that it was possible to register shapes1 and colours2 as trade marks under the previous legislation. It was the non-visual signs, sounds and scents that represented a radical addition to the law. In reality, the change was primarily designed to bring the Australian Act into line with overseas legislation and rulings. International trade mark law now recognises that with changing trading patterns, where products often have to sell themselves, different ways have evolved of attracting customers to products and enabling them to distinguish those products from competing products. Trade marks no longer merely indicate origin (source) and product quality. The modern rationale for trade mark protection incorporates the information or publicity a trade mark fulfils through advertising and promotion.3 * Principal Lecturer, School of Business, Swinburne University of Technology. *, Senior Lecturer, School of Business, Swinbume University of Technology. Although it was usually distinctive two-dimensional pictorial representations of products and packaging that were registered.
    [Show full text]
  • Viennetta Ice Cream Heats up Court: Distinctiveness in Shape Trade Marks Catherine Lee CLAYTON UTZ
    AUSTRALIAN INTELLECTUALINTELLECTUAL Law Bulletin PROPERTYPROPERTY Volume 16 Number 3 Information contained in this newsletter is current as at July 2003 Print Post Approved 255003/00767 Looking at smells and sounds: graphical representation of new trade marks Lauren Eade GILBERT + TOBIN General Editor The Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) allowed registration for the first time of a number of new forms of trade marks, including trade marks for colours, sounds Sharon Givoni and scents. There are some special problems for these new trade marks that do not Solicitor, Melbourne exist for ‘old’ trade marks such as words and devices. The first hurdle that must be met by any trade mark applicant is that of graphical representation. Graphical representation is required under reg 4.3(7) of the Trade Marks Regulations 1995 (Cth). Under s 40 of the Act, it is a ground for rejection of an application if a mark cannot be represented graphically. The purpose of graphical representation of trade marks is so that other traders can search the Register to contents determine whether there is any risk in using a particular mark or whether that mark is available for registration. 33 All trade marks under the 1955 Act were by definition capable of graphical Looking at smells and sounds: representation, being visible words and other signs. This is still the case for ‘new’ graphical representation of new shape and colour trade marks which can be represented in much the same way as trade marks old device marks. There are, of course, questions about how best to represent these 36 types of marks to maximise the monopoly afforded by registration (for example, Viennetta ice cream heats up how many perspectives of a shape are enough? Should a colour be described by court: distinctiveness in shape colour name, colour name and shade description, or industry standard colour trade marks system?).
    [Show full text]
  • Part 21 Shapes, Sounds, Colours, Scents and Aspects of Packaging Overview Relevant Legislation 1
    Part 21 Shapes, Sounds, Colours, Scents and Aspects of Packaging Overview Relevant Legislation 1. Shapes, sounds, colours, scents and aspects of packaging 2. Representing shapes, sounds, colours, scents and aspects of packaging 2.1 Description endorsement 2.2 Amendments to descriptions 2.3 Amending descriptions to accord with the representations on file 3. Shape (three -dimensional) trade marks 3.1 Representations and descriptions of shape trade marks 3.2 Shapes may be capable of distinguishing 3.3 Shapes wh ich are common to the trade 3.4 Shapes and functionality 3.5 Shapes and aesthetics 3.6 Shapes and invention 3.7 Researching shape marks 3.8 Shape of packaging or aspect of packaging 3.9 Evidence of use for shape trade marks 3.10 Registered design as a trad e mark 4. Colour and coloured trade marks 4.1 Representations and descriptions of colour marks 4.2 Combinations of colours applied to the goods or their packaging 4.3 Single all over colouring applied to the goods or their packaging Trade Marks Examiners M anual This document is controlled. Its accuracy can only be guaranteed when viewed electronically. Please check the on -line document for the correct Effective Date. Date Printed: October 2006 298 4.4 Colours claimed as trade marks for services 4.5 Registra bility of colours as trade marks 4.6 Researching colour trade marks 4.7 Evidence of use for colour trade marks 5. "Sensory" trade marks - sounds and scents 5.1 Representing sounds and scents 5.2 Researching sounds and scents 6. Sound (auditory) trade marks 6.1 Representations and descriptions of sound trade marks 6.2 Registrability of sounds as trade marks 7.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Other Characteristics' May Be Excluded Under Article 7(1)(E)
    KU LEUVEN CAMPUS BRUSSELS FACULTY OF LAW Academic year 2018-2019 Characteristically Vague: Clarifying Which ‘Other Characteristics’ May be Excluded Under Article 7(1)(e) EUTMR and Article 4(1)(e) EUTMD Promotor: Prof. Dr. Marie-Christine Master’s thesis, submitted by Janssens Richard Menzies as part of the final examination for the degree of Word Count: 16,417 MASTER OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND ICT LAW M AS TE R OF IN- TE KU LEUVEN CAMPUS BRUSSELS FACULTY OF LAW Academic year 2018-2019 Characteristically Vague: Clarifying Which ‘Other Characteristics’ May be Excluded Under Article 7(1)(e) EUTMR and Article 4(1)(e) EUTMD Promotor: Prof. Dr. Marie-Christine Master’s thesis, submitted by Janssens Richard Menzies as part of the final examination for the degree of Word Count: 16,417 MASTER OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND ICT LAW M AS TE R OF IN- Plagiarism declaration I confirm that this thesis is my own work, that all ideas contained in the thesis are expressed in my own words and that I have not literally or quasi-literally taken anything over from other texts, except for fragments cited between quotes for which I provided full and accurate bibliographical data. Richard Menzies Abstract The recast Article 7(1)(e) EUTMR and Article 4(1)(e) EUTMD extended the absolute grounds for refusal to signs which consist exclusively of ‘other characteristics’ of goods which: i) result from the nature of the goods themselves; ii) are necessary to obtain a technical result; iii) or give substantial value to the goods. These ‘other characteristics’ are permanently excluded from trade mark protection, without the possibility to establish acquired distinctiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • A System of Maltese Heraldry Issued by the Office of the Chief Herald of Arms of Malta
    1 A system of Maltese heraldry issued by The Office of the Chief Herald of Arms of Malta Introduction Heraldry is a broad term, encompassing the design, display, and study of armorial bearings or coats of arms. Such Arms may be personal and hereditary or impersonal and non-hereditary, examples of the latter are the Arms of banks, colleges, corporations etc. But whatever else they may be, coats of arms are essentially insignia of identification. There is a custom in Malta for members of different branches of a family to use identical Arms, without any attempt at differencing them i.e., modifying them for each branch of the family. This rather defeats the whole object of heraldry which is one of specific personal identification. The main reference work for people who wish to find "a coat of arms for their surname" is Stemmi Maltesi, an extensive black-and-white work published anonymously in the 19th century in folio form and out of print for many years, although Dr. Charles A. Gauci, currently Chief herald of Arms of Malta, produced a facsimile edition of this book in full colour, now, alas, also out of print (1) A number of the illustrations in Stemmi Maltesi seem to have been invented by the author(s) themselves as the Arms found in old manuscripts, on tombstones, in churches etc. often differ considerably from the ones shown in that work. Malta has a rich European tradition of heraldry which abounds everywhere. Coats of arms in Malta are those belonging to Knights of the Order of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Gilbert and Tobin Lawyers
    Partner Lisa Lennon Contact Lauren Eade T +61 2 9263 4369 [email protected] Our ref LML:LFE Sydney 14 December 2015 2 Park Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia GPO Box 3810 Sydney NSW 2001 By email www.gtlaw.com.au Intellectual Property Arrangements Inquiry Productivity Commission Email: [email protected] Dear Commissioners Submission to the Productivity Commission in response to the Inquiry into Intellectual Property Arrangements Thank you for the opportunity to make this submission in response to the Inquiry into Intellectual Property Arrangements. This submission covers intellectual property protection issues in relation to trade marks, designs and international treaty obligations. 1 Trade Marks 1.1 Initial Comments There are generally always alternatives available when selecting new brands so trade marks themselves are not an inherently anti-competitive form of IP right. If a sign has become synonymous with goods or services, then the sign would be regarded as descriptive, incapable of distinguishing one trader’s goods/services from those of another and therefore not registrable as a trade mark. These types of signs are generally available for all traders to use on their similar goods and services including as a result of initial registrability tests under section 41 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (TMA) and on the basis of defences under section 122. There are of course degrees of distinctiveness attributable to different trade marks, and the strength of exclusive rights in trade marks varies. It is widely recognised that
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit Blues: an Explanation of How the UK Legal Systems Protect Colour and How This May Be Affected by Recent Legal and Political Developments1
    Journal of the International Colour Association (2018): 21, 36-51 McCubbin Brexit Blues: an explanation of how the UK legal systems protect colour and how this may be affected by recent legal and political developments1 Caroline N. McCubbin Solicitor (non-practising), England, UK Email: [email protected] The study is an analysis of the legal mechanisms available in the United Kingdom (UK) to protect colour and the possible implications on these protections of the UK’s decision to leave the European Union (EU). The study explains the unique issues colour presents for the law and explores how the intellectual property system operates to generate rights over colours generally with reference to the colour blue as an illustrative thread running through the study. It has used both literary and web-based resources and contribution from those practising in the field. Consideration is then given to multiple colour rights and the interrelationship between the various rights in the context of the current political climate. Received 16 November 2017; revised 02 March 2018; accepted 17 March 2018 Published online: 26 March 2018 Introduction Colour impinges on many areas of life from world history, religion, science (physics, chemistry and biology), and art (in all its myriad forms from architecture to photography) to relatively more modern disciplines such as information technology. It is, by its nature, both multi-disciplinary and inter- disciplinary. Despite this or maybe because of it, colour is a universally understood phenomenon. However, like language, variants and nuances in understanding, meaning and classification are legion. So what I see as blue may not necessarily be what you see as blue and different cultures may name the same colours in different ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues Surrounding Registration of Colour Trade Marks
    RGSL RESEARCH PAPERS NO. 9 Issues surrounding registration of colour trade marks JEKATERINA KUDRJAVCEVA 2012 Riga Graduate School of Law Established in 1998, the Riga Graduate School of Law (RGSL) has emerged as a leading legal education and research institute in the Baltic region. RGSL offers numerous study programmes in the area of International and European Law at bachelor and master’s level and is in the process of establishing a doctoral programme. The School enjoys the support of important international donors and cooperates closely with the University of Latvia, which is the major shareholder. In addition to its growing resident faculty, RGSL also benefits from the cooperation with a large number of eminent scholars and practitioners based elsewhere in Europe an overseas. The School is located in the Art Nouveau district of Riga and hosts an outstanding law library. A primary objective of RGSL is to contribute to the development of Latvia and the wider region by educating new generations of motivated and highly skilled young scholars and professionals capable of facilitating the on-going process of European integration. Research and education in the area of international and European law are integral to the realisation of this objective. The present series of Research Papers documents the broad range of innovative scholarly work undertaken by RGSL academic staff, students, guest lecturers and visiting scholars. Editorial Board: George Ulrich (Prof., Ph.D) Frank Diedrich (Prof., Dr. iur. habil., MLE) Christopher Goddard (M.Ed.) Ligita Gjortlere (M.Sci.Soc.) About the author: Jekaterina Kudrjavceva (LL.M.) graduated from the Faculty of Law at the University of Sheffield, UK, in 2010 and obtained her LL.M in European and International law from the Riga Graduate School of Law in 2012.
    [Show full text]