DOCSLIB.ORG

Saturday, 17 October

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Saturday, 17 October Saturday, 17 October Welcome Remarks - Kathleen LeBesco, Associate Vice President for Strategic Initiatives, Professor of Communication and Media Arts, Marymount Manhattan College, New York, United States Plenary Session - Melanie Dupuis E. Melanie DuPuis is a professor and the chair of Environmental Studies and Science at Pace University and a professor emerita from University of California, Santa Cruz. She has a BA in anthropology from Harvard University and a PhD in development sociology from Cornell University. She is the author of Nature’s Perfect Food: How Milk Became America’s Drink, the co-author of Alternative Food Politics: Knowledge, Practice, and Politics, with David and Mike Goodman, and the editor of two edited collections: Smoke and Mirrors: The Politics and Culture of Air Pollution and Creating the Countryside: The Politics of Rural and Environmental Discourse. Her latest book, Dangerous Digestion: The Politics of American Dietary Advice, was published by UC Press in October of 2015. She is also the co-editor, with Matthew Garcia and Don Mitchell, of Food Across Borders. Dr. DuPuis has been involved in environmental, energy, and sustainable food policy issues and organizations since the 1990s. She was a founding member of the Farm and Food Project, a food policy group in the New York Capital Region. Prior to coming to Pace, DuPuis held academic and administration positions at the University of California, Washington Center, in Washington, DC, and University of California in Santa Cruz, CA. DuPuis worked for 10 years with Power Economics as a member of a consulting firm management team that provided economics witnesses in energy and environmental administrative and judicial procedures, including testimony against Enron. She was also the energy and environment policy analyst for the New York State Department of Economic Development during the 1990s. *This is a pre-recorded virtual plenary session. The link to the plenary will be sent on the first day of the conference to registered participants. Plenary Session - Mireya Loza Mireya Loza is an assistant professor of food studies in the Department of Nutrition and Food Studies. She earned her doctorate in American studies and an MA in public humanities at Brown University. In addition, she holds an MA in anthropology from the University of Texas at Austin and a BA from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Her areas of research include Latinx history, social movements, labor history, and food studies. Her book, Defiant Braceros: How Migrant Workers Fought for Racial, Sexual and Political Freedom (UNC Press), examines the Bracero Program and how guest workers negotiated the intricacies of indigeneity, intimacy, and transnational organizing. She is currently carrying out research for her second book project tentatively titled, The Strangeness and Bitterness of Plenty: Making Food and Seeing Race in the Agricultural West, 1942-1965. Her first book won the 2017 Theodore Saloutos Book Prize awarded by the Immigration and Ethnic History Society and the Smithsonian Secretary’s Research Prize. She was also named a distinguished lecturer by the Organization of American Historians. Her research has been funded by the Ford Foundation, the Mexico-North Research Network, and the National Endowment for the Humanities. Prior to joining the faculty at NYU she was a curator at the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of American History and an assistant professor in the Department of Latinx Studies and the Department of History at the University of Illinois. *This is a pre-recorded virtual plenary session. The link to the plenary will be sent on the first day of the conference to registered participants. PARALLEL SESSIONS Saturday, 17 October PARALLEL SESSIONS Toward Sustainable Communities Trading on "Terroir": Fostering Artisanal Cheese and Alcohol Production through Specialized Agrarian Industrial Districts Mariel Collard Mr. Stefan Norgaard We introduce and critically engage Specialized Agrarian Industrial Districts (SAIDs), geographically bounded zones that produce distinctive agricultural products, with localized-producer networks and regional inter-firm relations. We define characteristics that animate these zones, and their social/ecological opportunities and pitfalls. We examine the role that public actors—specifically nation-states—and local institutional arrangements play in supporting and enabling SAIDs as counters to global agro-industrial consolidation. Moreover, we consider SAIDs as new spatial sites, or geographical arenas for critical study. Our investigation examines cheese in the Franche-Comté, France and in Minas-Gerais, Brazil; and alcohol in South Africa’s Western Cape (wine) and Jalisco, Mexico (mezcal). Cheese and alcohol often require artisanal, centuries-old production and storage techniques; their biophysical properties and longstanding cultural traditions explain why SAIDs produce these commodities. Regulations and specific “denominations of origin” bound SAIDs, protecting them from pernicious, “race- to-the-bottom” globalization. SAIDs relate to land and property systems with long histories (agrarian reform, collective ownership, natural protection, and cultural/touristic heritage) and distinctive “terroir” (physical geographies with climate, topography, and soil central to production). SAIDs offer regional-development opportunities, negotiated relationships between workers and producers, and quality food. SAIDs cannot be created, but can be fostered where nascent. Yet concerns abound: exclusionary divisions that privilege “insiders” over “outsiders”; informal and exploited labor; nation-states that promote SAIDs at the expense of long-marginalized communities and social justice; and mass producers who deceive consumers by imitating SAIDs’ appeals. Nevertheless, if done right, SAIDs represent an urgently necessary alternative to “cheap food,” and a just, sustainable regional-development strategy. 2020 Special Focus—Making The Local: Place, Authenticity, Sustainability Authenticity and the Politics of Food in the Face of Climate Change Dr. Jody Beck Claims of authenticity, sustainability, and locality are often grounded in concepts of place as a stable foundation, with the capacity to generate a consistent set of material facts over time. The key to these material facts – from dishes to cuisines – is a consistent suite of ingredients, which in turn requires a consistent climate. It is therefore clear that we can no longer ground authenticity on previous concepts of place. However, authenticity is still a useful and valid concept within food discourse. The wedge that climate change is driving between authenticity and place, as we’ve used these terms, foregrounds that, at least within food discourse, authenticity is properly a descriptor of relationships, and not of material facts. This shift in turn directs us to unpack the concepts we often entrain with authenticity, which can only make a claim about representation, and can make no claim regarding moral or aesthetic value. Ironically, the common reasons for discussing food in terms of authenticity, sustainability, and locality is explicitly to make moral or aesthetic claims. In order to do this, however, we must first think about what kind of relationships we value. This very quickly takes us to the need to ground our discussions of the authenticity, sustainability, and locality of food in consideration of right political relationships. This paper explores the concept of right political relationships in relation to authenticity and food through the work of Arendt, Agamben, Marx, and Taylor. 2020 Special Focus—Making The Local: Place, Authenticity, Sustainability Pastel Maya: Processed Foods and the Re-appropriation of Mayanness Lauren Wynne The food of Mexico’s Yucatán Peninsula has been having a moment for at least a half of decade, exemplified by René Redzepi’s pop-up Noma outpost in Tulum and David Sterling’s two James Beard Awards for Yucatán: Recipes from a Culinary Expedition. While anthropologists and allied scholars have worked to critique the category of “Mayanness” since the 1990s, outsider appreciation for “Mayan food” still often rests on assumptions of authenticity and naturalness. Amidst all of this, the term is increasingly claimed by indigenous people themselves. This is happening in a multitude of ways, in ways that are sometimes clearly linked to the commodified value of Mayanness in the tourist industry but also in ways that suggest attempts to wrestle meaning-making away from regional and global elites. This paper explores the creation and recreation of a newer dish called “pastel maya” that consists largely of mass-produced and highly processed ingredients. The paper considers how the use of “maya” to describe this dish poses a challenge both to scholarly rejections of the descriptor and to outsiders’ attempts to romanticize or capture local foodways, and culture more generally. 2020 Special Focus—Making The Local: Place, Authenticity, Sustainability Making Place Real: Creating an Edible, Sustainable Urban Campus Jerri Husch American University’s (AU) new strategic plan, grounded in the values of scholarship, learning, and community, is committed to bettering the human condition and effecting meaningful change. To support these goals, AU prioritizes experiential learning and building the practical skills needed to address food security, regenerative agriculture, and urban resilience. Through an all campus integrated initiative, "Learning by Leading," AU students,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Why Calories Count' Weighs in on Food and Politics 24 April 2012, by Susan Kelley
    'Why Calories Count' weighs in on food and politics 24 April 2012, By Susan Kelley The authors not only explain how scientists count calories in food and measure how bodies use them but also why we need calories for survival, warmth and work, covering metabolism and how the body uses calories. They also discuss calorie needs, the difficulties of estimating calorie intake and the body's complex weight management system. In exploring issues related to too few calories, they discuss starvation, global hunger and whether restricting calories could prolong human life. Their section on too many calories covers obesity, the complex relationship between calories and weight gain, whether all calories are created equal and whether some kinds of diets work better than others. A calorie is simply a measurement of energy. But it's also the source of confusion and worry for Having armed readers with the necessary many people trying to lose weight. At the same information to interpret food labels, evaluate diet time, calories -- too few or too many -- are causing claims and understand evidence as presented in health problems resulting from malnutrition and popular media, Nesheim and Nestle elucidate the obesity that affect billions of people around the political stakes and show how federal and world. corporate policies have come together to create an "eat more" environment. Finally, the authors offer A new 304-page book, "Why Calories Count: From some candid advice: Get organized. Eat less. Eat Science to Politics" (University of California Press), better. Move more. Get political. aims to clear up the confusion. It explains in accessible language what calories are and how "Ultimately, the calorie is political: marketing affects they work, biologically and politically.
    [Show full text]
  • Food) Politics Is Local: Increasing Food Access Through Local Government Action
    All (Food) Politics is Local: Increasing Food Access through Local Government Action The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Emily M. Broad Leib, All (Food) Politics is Local: Increasing Food Access through Local Government Action, 7 Harv. L. & Pol'y Rev. 321 (2013). Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11189975 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP \\jciprod01\productn\H\HLP\7-2\HLP202.txt unknown Seq: 1 9-AUG-13 9:27 All (Food) Politics is Local: Increasing Food Access Through Local Government Action Emily M. Broad Leib* I. INTRODUCTION Our national and international food system1 has implications for a wide range of issues that are important across the political spectrum and include improving health outcomes,2 reducing environmental impacts,3 increasing social justice,4 fostering economic development,5 and even improving home- land security.6 This article focuses on healthy-food access, one of the most urgent food policy issues because of its social and economic effects, as well as its public health impacts. In 2010, thirty-six percent of Americans were obese and another thirty-three percent were overweight,7 while eight percent of Americans were diabetic and thirty-five percent suffered from pre-diabe- tes.8 Though food access is not perfectly correlated with public health out- * Director of the Harvard Law School Food Law and Policy Clinic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Politics of Food: a Critical Overview Nancy Ehrenreich
    University of Miami Law School Institutional Repository University of Miami Inter-American Law Review 10-1-2011 The Global Politics of Food: A Critical Overview Nancy Ehrenreich Beth Lyon Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.law.miami.edu/umialr Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Nancy Ehrenreich and Beth Lyon, The Global Politics of Food: A Critical Overview, 43 U. Miami Inter-Am. L. Rev. 1 (2011) Available at: http://repository.law.miami.edu/umialr/vol43/iss1/3 This Foreword is brought to you for free and open access by Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Inter- American Law Review by an authorized administrator of Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 LatCrit South-North Exchange The Global Politics of Food: Sustainability and Subordination The Global Politics of Food: A Critical Overview @Nancy Ehrenreich & Beth Lyon* Like many other arenas of life, the world of food is a world of politics and power. Inequalities of power and privilege across the globe affect who has access to food and who does not, who controls its production and who is harmed by that production, how con- sumptive choices are constructed and constrained, and whether * Professor of Law and William M. Beaney Memorial Research Chair, Denver University Sturm College of Law and Professor of Law, Villlanova University School of Law. We thank Shawn Hogue, Anthony Hearn, and the entire editorial board of the Inter-American Law Review for their hard work on our article and this Symposium.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction the Global Environmental Politics of Food • Jennifer Clapp and Caitlin Scott*
    Introduction The Global Environmental Politics of Food • Jennifer Clapp and Caitlin Scott* This special issue seeks to expand our understanding of the complex inter- linkages between the politics and governance of the global environment, on one hand, and the global food system on the other. The articles in this issue explore insights that the field of global environmental politics can bring to questions of food system sustainability, while at the same time considering what the relationship between food systems and the environment reveals about the nature of global environmental politics. The authors examine how issues at the intersection of environment and food are framed in international political settings; the articles explore the political and economic dynamics surrounding different actors—including states, corporations, civil society organizations, and marginalized populations—in shaping debates around how best to govern these issues. This focus on the global environmental politics of food is, in our view, much needed. In the decade since the 2007–08 global food crisis, people have become increasingly more aware of the linkages between food systems and envi- ronmental systems. The industrial production, distribution, storage, and market- ing systems that provide much of the world’s food utilize large amounts of water and fossil energy and contribute significantly to deforestation, biodiversity loss, soil erosion, chemical exposure, depletion of fisheries, and climate change. The extent of the ecological crisis associated with the global food and agriculture system is widely understood in the scientific community and backed by growing volumes of empirical data that have enormous policy significance (e.g., Foley et al.
    [Show full text]
  • MARION NESTLE, Ph.D., M.P.H. May 2021 EDUCATION 1954-59 U
    Department of Nutrition & Food Studies New York University Marion Nestle 411 Lafayette Street, 5th Floor Paulette Goddard Professor of Nutrition, Food Studies, and Public Health, Emerita New York, NY 10003-7035 P: 212 998 5595 [email protected] www.foodpolitics.com @marionnestle MARION NESTLE, Ph.D., M.P.H. May 2021 EDUCATION 1954-59 U. California Berkeley, Bacteriology, Phi Beta Kappa BA 1963-68 U. California Berkeley, Molecular Biology PhD 1985-86 U. California Berkeley, Public Health Nutrition MPH HONORARY DEGREES 2016 Doctor of Humane Letters, Macaulay Honors College, City University of New York 2012 Doctor of Science Honoris Causa, Transylvania University, Kentucky LICENSE New York State Certification in Nutrition and Dietetics, License #000007 PRIMARY APPOINTMENTS 1988- New York University, Department of Nutrition and Food Studies, Steinhardt School 2017- Paulette Goddard Professor, Emerita 2014- College of Global Public Health (Affiliated) 2006- Department of Sociology, Professor (Affiliated) 2004- Paulette Goddard Professor 2003-04 Professor and Director of Public Health Initiatives 1988-03 Professor and Chair 2006- Cornell University, College of Agriculture, Division of Nutritional Sciences (Affiliated) VISITING APPOINTMENTS 2019 University of California, Berkeley, Graduate School of Journalism (Spring) 2018 University of Gastronomic Sciences, Pollenzo, Italy (Spring) 2017 Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica, Cuernavaca, Mexico, Fulbright Specialist (Spring) 2016 University of Sydney, Charles Perkins Centre, Distinguished
    [Show full text]
  • Dietary Change and Debate About Food Allergy in the United States
    39 3 Allergic to Innovation? Dietary Change and Debate about Food Allergy in the United States Matthew Smith Introduction Th e expert on nutrition is not the nutrition expert, but the man who has studied nutrition by the ultimate method of research, the struggle for survival. Th e Eskimo, living on the ice fl oes of the North Pole, the Red Indian travelling hard and far over wild lands in hunting or war, the trapper in the Canadian forests, the game hunters in Africa – these men must fi nd food that gives the greatest nutritive value in the smallest bulk [. .] All these men have found that a diet of meat and animal fat alone, with no carbohydrates, with no fruit or vegetables, with no vitamins other than those they get in meat, not merely provides them with all the energy they need, but keeps them in perfect health for months at a time. Seal meat and blubber for the Eskimo, pemmican for the Indian and the trapper, biltong for the hunter, have proved to be the perfect diet. 1 In the search for the ideal diet, is it best to innovate? Or is it better to look to the past, perhaps even the distant past? 2 In his foreword to the bestselling Eat Fat and Grow Slim (1958), a diet book written by British psychiatrist Richard Mackarness (1916–1996), Sir Heneage Ogilvie (1887–1971) opted for the latter. Both argued that the protein- and fat-rich diets of early humans, which still endured in existing hunter/gatherer communities, were clearly superior to anything that had been developed since.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Industry Funding of Nutrition Research: the Relevance of History for Current Debates
    Food Industry Funding of Nutrition Research Invited Commentary Invited Commentary HEALTH CARE POLICY AND LAW Food Industry Funding of Nutrition Research The Relevance of History for Current Debates Marion Nestle, PhD, MPH Industry-sponsored nutrition research, like that of research Figure. Close Epidemiological Correlations Between Sugar and Saturated sponsored by the tobacco, chemical, and pharmaceutical in- Fat “Consumption” and Mortality in 14 Countries dustries, almost invariably produces results that confirm the benefits or lack of harm of the sponsor’s products, even when Sugar Consumption, lb/y 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 independently sponsored re- 900 search comes to opposite Sugar Saturated fat Author Audio Interview 1 conclusions. Although con- 800 USA siderable evidence demon- Australia Related article strates that those industries 700 deliberately influenced the Canada 2 design, results, and interpretation of the studies they paid for, 600 much less is known about the influence of food-company spon- Finland New Zealand sorship on nutrition research. Typically, the disclosure state- 500 ments of sponsored nutrition studies state that the funder United Kingdom had no role in their design, conduct, interpretation, writing, 400 or publication. Without a “smoking gun” it is difficult to prove Denmark Mortality per 100 000 otherwise. 300 Sweden In this issue of JAMA Internal Medicine, Kearns and Norway Switzerland colleagues3 report on having found a smoking gun. From a deep 200 dive into archival documents from the 1950s and 1960s, they W Germany Italy have produced compelling evidence that a sugar trade asso- 100 Japan France ciation not only paid for but also initiated and influenced re- search expressly to exonerate sugar as a major risk factor for 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 coronary heart disease (CHD).
    [Show full text]
  • Does the Australian Health Star Rating System Encourage Added Sugar Reformulation? Trends in Sweetener Use in Australia
    nutrients Article Does the Australian Health Star Rating System Encourage Added Sugar Reformulation? Trends in Sweetener Use in Australia Cherie Russell 1,* , Sarah Dickie 1 , Phillip Baker 1,2 and Mark Lawrence 1,2 1 School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong 3217, Australia; [email protected] (S.D.); [email protected] (P.B.); [email protected] (M.L.) 2 Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong 3217, Australia * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Dietary risk factors, including excess added sugar intake, are leading contributors to Australia’s burden of disease. An objective of the Australian Health Star Rating (HSR) system is to encourage the reformulation of packaged foods. Manufacturers may improve a product’s HSR by replacing added sugar with non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS). Concerns have been raised regarding the potential substitution effects of ultra-processed foods containing NNS for whole foods, and the long-term impact this may have on population health. The aim of this study was to determine whether the implementation of the HSR system has impacted the use of added sugars and NNS in the food supply. Four product categories were used: products with no added sweetener, products containing added sugar only, products containing NNS only, and products containing a combination of added sugar and NNS. Of 6477 newly released products analyzed displaying a HSR in Australia between 2014–2020, 63% contained added sugars. The proportion of new products sweetened with added sugars increased over time, while NNS use did not, despite a higher average and median Citation: Russell, C.; Dickie, S.; Baker, P.; Lawrence, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics of Food Access in Food Insecure Communities
    POLITICS OF FOOD ACCESS IN FOOD INSECURE COMMUNITIES By Darcy A. Freedman Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSPHY in Community Research and Action August, 2008 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Professor Paul W. Speer Professor Monica J. Casper Professor Kenneth A. Wallston Professor Craig Anne Heflinger Professor Marino A. Bruce To my mother and grandmothers, Donna Stayin Sens, Esther Feiner Freedman, and Viola Tomin Stayin. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Saying thank you and publicly acknowledging the myriad people involved with this research is humbling. Although I will try, words cannot express my gratitude for each of you. First and foremost, this research would not have occurred without the support of funding from the Baptist Health Trust, Vanderbilt Center for Community Studies, Vanderbilt Center for Ethics, and Global Feminisms Collaborative. Along with this financial support, I also received immeasurable amounts of wisdom, guidance and assistance from Sarah Bellos, Barbara Clinton, Royce Fentress, Kim Harrell, Cassi Johnson, Kate Lassiter, Jeff Middlebrooks, Mary Kate Mouser, Sharon Shields, and Bobby Lee Smith as well as from the directors and staff at the Boys and Girls Clubs. Thank you for your willingness and openness to work collaboratively as we transformed the Boys and Girls Clubs into farmers’ markets during the summer of 2007. An extra special thank you is extended to Shavaun Evans, Shacora Moore, and Courtney Williams, the research assistants on this project. Each of these individuals added to the dynamics of this research endeavor. Without one of them, the project would most certainly have ebbed and flowed differently.
    [Show full text]
  • SUGAR 2 V2.Indd
    Added Sugar, Subtracted Science How Industry Obscures Science and Undermines Public Health Policy on Sugar Added Sugar, Subtracted Science How Industry Obscures Science and Undermines Public Health Policy on Sugar Gretchen Goldman Christina Carlson Deborah Bailin Lindsey Fong Pallavi Phartiyal June 2014 {cS CenterD for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists © 2014 Union of Concerned Scientists All Rights Reserved Gretchen Goldman is an analyst in the Center for Science and Democracy at UCS. Christina Carlson is a policy research assistant in the Center for Science and Democracy at UCS. Deborah Bailin is a democracy analyst and ACLS public fellow in the Center for Science and Democracy at UCS. Lindsey Fong was an associate policy researcher in the Center for Science and Democracy at UCS. Pallavi Phartiyal is the senior analyst and program manager for the Center for Science and Democracy at UCS. The Union of Concerned Scientists puts rigorous, independent science to work to solve our planet’s most pressing problems. Joining with citizens across the country, we combine technical analysis and effective advocacy to create innovative, practical solutions for a healthy, safe, and sustainable future. The Center for Science and Democracy at UCS works to strengthen American democracy by advancing the essential role of science, evidence-based decision making, and constructive debate as a means to improve the health, security, and prosperity of all people. More information about UCS and the Center for Science and Democracy is available on the UCS website: www.ucsusa.org. This report is available online (in PDF format) at www.ucsusa.org/addedsugar.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Politics in the Coronavirus Era, Fall 2020
    1 FOOD-UE.1116 Food Politics in the Era of Coronavirus 2 credits, pass/fail Asynchronous: Lectures, reading, and writing Synchronous: Discussion and office hours Instructor: Marion Nestle, PhD, MPH (University of California Berkeley) [email protected] Teaching Assistant: Allison Lindsey, MA (NYU) [email protected] Discussion hours: The class will hold open hours for discussion during part of the scheduled time block: Tuesdays 10:00 a.m. - 12:15 p.m. Specific times will be announced each week. Additional times will be scheduled and arranged during the first week of class depending on time-zone constraints. The Tuesday and one other time slot will be reserved for discussion about class content but we will also schedule “anything goes” chat times for talking about whatever you would like to. These are our only chances to get to know you so we hope you will take advantage of them. DESCRIPTION The global pandemic caused by the viral disease Covid-19 has devastated lives and economies, but also has exposed the contradictions and inequities of food systems that prioritize profits over public health. These were most visible in the culling of food animals and destruction of dairy and vegetable products while the newly unemployed lined up for donations from food banks, as well as in the designation of poorly paid, marginalized farm and slaughterhouse workers as essential to the national defense. This course explores such matters while investigating the effects of today’s global food systems on major food and nutrition problems: undernutrition (hunger, malnutrition, food insecurity), overnutrition (overweight-influenced noncommunicable diseases such as type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease), and the effects of current food production and consumption practices on the environment and vice versa.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Food in a Global Economy
    125B: The Politics of Food in a Global Economy Spring 2015, Room HSS 1330, Tuesday & Thursday, 11:00 am -12:20 pm Prof. Megumi Naoi TA: Ike Sharpless TA: Jason Kuo Office SSB 373 Coffee cart at SSB (1st SSB 351 Office hrs Wed: 3:00-4:30 pm floor) Tues: 12:30-1:30 pm E-mail [email protected] Thurs: 12:45-1:45pm Jason Kuo m <ikesharpless@gmail. <[email protected]> com> Course Website: https://ted.ucsd.edu/ (Search for Instructor “Naoi”). All the readings and lecture slides will be uploaded on TED. Important Due Dates: April 16 (Thursday): Assignment I due in class (30% of your grade): Your own research memo on the politics of agricultural protectionism in two countries of your choice from the dataset below (5-page, single-spaced text with figures you made from World Bank’s Estimates of Distortions to Agricultural Incentives, 1955-2011). See the Template for this assignment at the end of this syllabus. Open-book and open sources. You can also discuss your research with anyone. When you incorporate their insights and suggestions, make sure to acknowledge them in the memo as scholarly etiquette. May 12 (Tuesday): Sign-up due date for voluntary presentations between May 26-June 4 (see below). May 19 (Tuesday): In-class quiz on readings and lecture through TOPIC 6 (20% of your grade): This will be multiple choice questions on the required readings and lectures. Closed book. May 26 – June 4: In addition to my lecture about ethical consumption, there will be a several students’ presentations of their research on the politics of food that the lecture did not cover, or, food-related activities and NGOs that they are involved in.
    [Show full text]