DOCSLIB.ORG

What Schultz Knew of All the Officials Questioned in the Sandusky Child Sex Abuse Scandal, Only One Admitted to Knowing of Two Alleged Incidents — Gary Schultz

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What Schultz Knew of All the Officials Questioned in the Sandusky Child Sex Abuse Scandal, Only One Admitted to Knowing of Two Alleged Incidents — Gary Schultz 10 DECEMBER 20, 2011 Joe Hermitt, The Patriot-News Former Penn State Vice President Gary Schultz enters the Dauphin County Courthouse on Friday for his preliminary hearing on charges related to the Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse case. What Schultz knew Of all the officials questioned in the Sandusky child sex abuse scandal, only one admitted to knowing of two alleged incidents — Gary Schultz BY SARA GANIM l The Patriot-News t was fairly clear to those listen- against Sandusky. ing to testimony on Friday in And that was Schultz. Dauphin County court that many One of the little-mentioned wit- people knew about child sex nesses during the preliminary hearing abuse allegations against Jerry was Tom Harmon, the former Penn ISandusky in 2002. State University police chief, whose Mike McQueary. His father, John sole purpose on the stand was to link McQueary. State College doctor Jona- Schultz to the 1998 case and explain than Dranov. that his department was kept in the Penn State’s revered football coach dark about the similar 2002 allegation. Joe Paterno. Athletic Director Tim It’s becoming obvious that Schultz Curley. Vice President Gary Schultz. is now a focus of the public argument President Graham Spanier. Jack about moral responsibility to do more Raykovitz, the former CEO of San- — the same that led to the ousters of dusky’s charity, The Second Mile. Paterno and Spanier. But during the hearing on perjury In the court of law, the felony per- and failure-to-report charges against jury charge is a much bigger deal — it Curley and Schultz, it also became carries a seven-year sentence. very clear that just one of those fig- But in the court of public opinion, ures knew this wasn’t the first time the summary failure to report — that someone made accusations which has the same consequences as PULITZER PRIZE ENTRY: LOCAL REPORTING JERRY SANDUSKY AND PENN STATE | PAGE 47 WHAT SCHULTZ KNEW DECEMBER 20, 2011 a traffic ticket — has been much more of a focus. Schultz, the only official to admit to knowing about two alleged incidents instead of one, is emerging as a key fig- ure of blame in the prosecution’s case. What Schultz knew, said Harmon, now retired and living in Pittsburgh, took the stand as the second witness Friday and testified that he remembers four phone calls with Schultz in 1998 about allegations that Sandusky hugged a boy during a shower in the Penn State football locker room. During the last conversation, Har- mon said, he told Schultz that former District Attorney Ray Gricar reviewed the facts and determined no charges would be filed. Harmon also said Schultz, who was his boss, never told him about what was reported in 2002, but if he would have known, “We would have inves- tigated and notified the DA,” he testi- fied. By contrast, only a small portion of the testimony was about the perjury case against his co-defendant, Curley. McQueary testified that Curley police department, knew about a and Schultz sat down with him and weeks-long investigation four years listened to him recount what he had prior, involving Sandusky, a boy and seen in the shower that night — San- the same locker room as the one dusky standing with his front pressed where McQueary told him he wit- up against the back of a boy about nessed a sexual assault. 10 years old. It’s McQueary’s word Only Schultz told the grand jury that against theirs about the extent of the state Children and Youth Services was detail. involved in the 2002 case, when there A Dauphin County district judge is no record that the agency was ever ruled Friday after the daylong hearing told. that the state has enough evidence to Only Schultz told grand jurors that go to trial against Curley and Schultz. he believed Sandusky had grabbed The hearing testimony seemed the boy’s genitals during some kind of lopsided, weighed heavily against horseplay. Schultz. McQueary testified that by talking Only Schultz sat down with John to Schultz, he believed he had noti- McQueary and Dranov weeks after the fied police of what he’d seen in 2002, 2002 incident was reported by gradu- because Schultz was in charge of cam- ate assistant Mike McQueary, now an pus police. assistant coach, and was told for a sec- ond time that something very sexual Why no follow-ups? happened, according to testimony. After deciding that Sandusky should Only Schultz, head of the campus be banned from bringing kids to cam- PULITZER PRIZE ENTRY: LOCAL REPORTING JERRY SANDUSKY AND PENN STATE | PAGE 48 WHAT SCHULTZ KNEW DECEMBER 20, 2011 pus following the 2002 report by Mc- for a minute that Tim Curley, Joe Queary, Curley is the one who made Paterno and Gary Schultz and Spa- the call to The Second Mile, telling nier, the university president, were Raykovitz that there had been an in- told by Mike McQueary that he, Jerry ternal investigation into Sandusky. Sandusky, was having anal sex with Raykovitz apparently did not tell the a 10-year-old looking kid in a shower charity’s board, and former members room on Penn State property and their became the latest to publicly defend response was simply to tell Sandusky themselves Monday. ‘don’t go in the shower anymore with Police detective Ronald Schreffler kids,’ I suggest you dial 1-800-REAL- and Pennsylvania Children and Youth ITY.” Services investigator Jerry Lauro, both involved in the 1998 case, have blamed Schultz’s attorney: It makes no sense Gricar for not pursuing that case. A similar argument was made by No one can ask Gricar why the case Schultz’s attorney, Tom Farrell, at the wasn’t prosecuted, because he has preliminary hearing. been missing for seven years and has It makes no sense, he argued, that been legally declared dead. McQueary, his father, Paterno, Schultz Schreffler listened in as Sandusky and Curley would all decide not to gave a seeming confession to the call police if something so heinous mother of a boy who was allegedly was really described back in 2002. touched by Sandusky during a show- And, through questioning of Har- er in 1998, according to a grand jury mon, he showed that Schultz did noth- report. Schreffler said Monday he ing to shape the 1998 investigation. would never question Gricar’s judg- “He never gave you instructions as ment. to how to enforce the law?” Farrell However, Schreffler would not asked Harmon. discuss why he didn’t revisit the case “He did not.” after Gricar left office. “Did he ever interfere with you en- McQueary, when testifying Friday, forcing the law?” was asked a similar question about “He did not.” the 2002 incident he reported. He continued. He said, absolutely, he believed he “And he let the investigation run its observed a crime. course?” So, why didn’t he follow up? His “Yes.” answer was that he quietly disagreed “The investigation was closed be- with Penn State’s decision. cause it was determined that no crime The inaction is sure to be a big part had occurred?” of Sandusky’s defense. “Correct.” Sandusky is facing more than 50 Curley was never told about the 1998 charges of child sex abuse involving investigation, Harmon testified. So 10 victims. He waived a preliminary far, there’s no indication Spanier knew hearing last week and faces trial in about it, either. Centre County Court. He has main- Scott Paterno, the son of the legend- tained his innocence and plans to ary former coach, has said he’s been fight the charges. assured by university counsel that his While McQueary’s graphic testimo- father knew nothing about the 1998 ny about seeing a boy being assaulted report. in a shower late at night in March Earlier, on the stand, Harmon said 2002 was compelling, Sandusky’s at- he talked to Schultz once a week or so. torney, Joe Amendola, has pointed out “Did Schultz ever talk to you about that his reaction doesn’t match the this incident?” prosecutor Bruce description of what he saw. Beemer asked. “If anyone is naive enough to think “He did not,” Harmon said. PULITZER PRIZE ENTRY: LOCAL REPORTING JERRY SANDUSKY AND PENN STATE | PAGE 49.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report of the Special Investigative Counsel Regarding the Actions of the Pennsylvania State University Related to the Child Sexual Abuse Committed by Gerald A
    Report of the Special Investigative Counsel Regarding the Actions of The Pennsylvania State University Related to the Child Sexual Abuse Committed by Gerald A. Sandusky Freeh Sporkin & Sullivan, LLP July 12, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Scope of Review and Methodology ..........................................................................................8 Independence of the Investigation .........................................................................................11 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................13 Findings Recommendations for University Governance, Administration, and the Protection of Children in University Facilities and Programs Timeline of Significant Events ................................................................................................19 Chapter 1: The Pennsylvania State University – Governance and Administration ...........................................................................................................................31 I. Key Leadership Positions A. President B. Executive Vice President and Provost (“EVP‐ Provost”) C. Senior Vice President ‐ Finance and Business (“SVP‐ FB”) D. General Counsel II. Principal Administrative Areas A. University Police and Public Safety (“University Police Department”) B. Office of Human Resources (“OHR”) C. Department of Intercollegiate Athletics (“Athletic Department”) D. Outreach III. Administrative Controls A. Policies and Procedures B. Oversight and
    [Show full text]
  • Attorney for Victim 5: Paterno Family Report Is Self-Serving, Does Nothing for the Victims
    By Ivey DeJesus PennLive.com Sunday, Feb. 10, 2013 Attorney for Victim 5: Paterno family report is self-serving, does nothing for the victims The attorney for one of Jerry Sandusky's victims - known in court as Victim 5 - blasted the newly released Paterno family report defending the late coach's handling of the child sex crime case as a self-serving critique of the Freeh investigation. Philadelphia attorney Tom Kline, who represented Victim 5 throughout the Sandusky trial, said the Paterno family's report falls short by focusing solely on Joe Paterno, his tarnished legacy and criticism of him. "There's nothing in this report which advances the victims," Kline said. "This is all about Joe Paterno and his legacy and restoring his reputation. When the victims, to a one, I'm quite certain, will feel the real focus should be on them and what was done to them and how it was allowed to happen on Penn State campus ... right under the nose of the coach. That's really what this is about." Kline said the victims largely see the report as the latest answer in "an intramural squabble" between the family and those involved in the Sandusky matter. "The clear purpose of the report is to attempt to elevate and restore Paterno's reputation when Penn State has been working to a different goal, which is to try and turn the corner for the university," Kline said. "I don't see how this personalized fight that is now picked by the Paterno family with Penn State, Louis Freeh and the NCAA advances the ball, to use a football analogy, one yard." The Paterno family report, which found the Freeh report flawed, changes nothing, Kline said.
    [Show full text]
  • The Betrayal of Joe Paterno: How It All Probably Happened
    The Betrayal of Joe Paterno: How It All Probably Happened Submitted by jzadmin on Wed, 07/10/2013 - 10:54 “A lie gets half way around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on.” Winston Churchill "In the aftermath of the Freeh Report, the powers that be at present at Penn State should have the good graces to suspend the football program for at least a year, perhaps more.” Bob Costas, July 17th, 2012 “That doesn’t necessarily make sense.” Bob Costas, May 29th, 2013, on the underlying theory of the same Freeh Report A year ago this week the Freeh Report investigation of Penn State and Joe Paterno was released to great fanfare. Largely because of that report, most people seem to think they know the story of the Jerry Sandusky scandal. Almost all of them are at least somewhat mistaken, and most are very wrong about what actually happened. Amazingly, the average media person, because they have a stronger incentive to believe they didn’t blindly perpetrate a false narrative, appears to be even more in the dark than the typical American is about the real truth of this tragedy. After spending most of the past year and a half researching, pondering, and speaking to more people closer to the Jerry Sandusky case than likely anyone else in the world, even I am still not positive that I know exactly what really transpired in the so called “Penn State Scandal.” While I am quite certain that the largely accepted media storyline of some concerted “cover up” by Penn State of Sandusky’s crimes is false, I am somewhat convinced that we may never know for sure precisely what actually did occur.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 National Institute for the Study, Prevention and Treatment
    National Institute for the Study, Prevention and Treatment of Sexual Trauma 104 E. Biddle Street Baltimore, MD 21202 (410) 539-1661 [email protected] February 6, 2013 J. Sedwick Sollers, III Attorney at Law King and Spalding, LLP 1700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 200 Washington, DC 20006-4707 RE: Joseph Paterno Dear Mr. Sollers: As an expert on Pedophilia, I am writing in response to a request for my professional opinions about the document titled “Report of the Special Investigative Counsel Regarding the Actions of the Pennsylvania State University Related to the Child Sexual Abuse Committed by Gerald A. Sandusky.” That document, which had been produced by Freeh, Sporkin, and Sullivan, LLP, is dated July 12, 2012, and it has sometimes been referred to as the “Freeh Report.” I was asked to focus on inferences that have been made about Joseph Paterno in that report, and to additionally focus on his response to the information he received about Gerald A. Sandusky. I have been asked to do so in light of my extensive experience in assessing and treating pedophilia, and in researching and addressing child sexual abuse, and related issues. My professional background also includes training in the behavioral sciences, and in the assessment of mental and motivational states. To that end, I have testified in Federal Court on more than one occasion as an expert psychiatric witness; providing information to jurors to assist them in determining the motivational state (i.e., the mental intent) of accused defendants. Because the “Freeh Report” has made certain inferences about Joseph Paterno’s alleged mental motivations, I will comment briefly about that aspect of the report as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Verdict Turns Page in Penn State Child Molestation Scandal
    By MARK SCOLFORO March 25, 2017 Verdict turns page in Penn State child molestation scandal HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — Penn State is trying to turn the corner on the Jerry Sandusky child molestation scandal, but the former FBI director who authored a scathing report on it more than four years ago says more changes are needed, even after the conviction of the university's former president. A jury's guilty verdict against Graham Spanier on Friday to a misdemeanor count of child endangerment made him the last of the three former high-ranking administrators to be held criminally culpable for how they handled a 2001 complaint about Sandusky sexually abusing a boy in a team shower. Penn State issued a statement after the verdict, saying the justice system had produced "closure" in the criminal cases that began with Sandusky's arrest in 2011. The school said Spanier's conviction and guilty pleas by two other former top administrators indicated a "profound failure of leadership." But former FBI director Louis Freeh said Penn State needs "new leadership and vision" and called on Penn State President Eric Barron to resign. "Pennsylvania taxpayers, the entire (Penn State) community and responsible political leaders should be 'appalled' by Barron and his entire 'leadership' team," said Freeh. He had remained largely silent for more than four years, as his report became a target of heated criticism by supporters of Spanier, his former co-defendants, Tim Curley and Gary Schultz, and of the school's Hall of Fame head football coach, the late Joe Paterno. Curley, then the athletic director, and Schultz, a vice president, pleaded guilty to misdemeanor child endangerment last week and testified for the prosecution.
    [Show full text]
  • By Devon Lash, Peter Hall and Tim Darragh, of the Morning Call 10:45 PM EDT, July 12, 2012
    By Devon Lash, Peter Hall and Tim Darragh, Of The Morning Call 10:45 PM EDT, July 12, 2012 Freeh: Penn State leaders agreed to hide abuse; their silence failed the victims Investigators say university's culture bears some blame for not stopping Sandusky A special investigation pins much of the blame for the Jerry Sandusky sex-abuse scandal on the do- nothing attitude of four top Penn State administrators — including legendary football coach Joe Paterno — who kept allegations under wraps to protect the university's image, according to a searing report released Thursday. "The evidence clearly shows, in our view, an active agreement to conceal," Louis Freeh, a former FBI director who led the eight-month investigation, said at a news conference in Philadelphia. Paterno and other top Penn State figures put the university's reputation over children's safety, emphasizing what was called "the Penn State Way" that promoted athletics without fear of oversight or reprisal from an ineffective board of trustees. Those are some of the "saddening and sobering" findings in a 267-page investigation commissioned by Penn State that examined how the university handled allegations that Sandusky was sexually abusing children on campus. Sandusky, a retired Penn State assistant football coach, was convicted June 22 on 45 of 48 counts of child sex abuse against 10 victims from 1994 to 2009. For 14 years, Paterno, who coached football for more than six decades, exhibited a "total disregard" for the victims and concealed critical facts to avoid bad publicity, according to the report. "Sixty-one years of excellent service to the university is now marred," said Trustee Karen Peetz.
    [Show full text]
  • Penn State Sex Abuse Scandal Chips at Joe Paterno Legacy by Erik Brady and Jack Carey, USA TODAY
    Penn State sex abuse scandal chips at Joe Paterno legacy By Erik Brady and Jack Carey, USA TODAY STATE COLLEGE, Pa. – Joe Paterno isn't just Penn State's football coach Updated 11/8/2011 1:28 PM He has long been seen as the avuncular symbol of all that is good and right with the game. His 409 wins are the most of any coach in major-college history. They were amassed by generations of players in vanilla uniforms, and without a cheating scandal. Now, a little more than a week after Paterno got his record-setting 409th win, the view of his storied, 46-year career suddenly is undergoing a stark revision — tarnished by a child sexual abuse scandal at Penn State with echoes of the one that rocked the Roman Catholic Church. Two Penn State officials surrendered Monday to authorities in Harrisburg, Pa., on charges they failed to report suspected abuse by Jerry Sandusky, a former assistant coach. Sandusky, 67, who was on Paterno's staff for more than three decades and widely was seen as his heir apparent before retiring in 1999, is charged with multiple felonies in the alleged abuse of eight boys over a 15-year period. Paterno, 84, has not been charged, and prosecutors say he is not a target of their investigation. But his actions — or lack of them — have many in the court of public opinion judging him harshly. According to a grand jury report, a graduate assistant told Paterno in 2002 that he had seen a naked Sandusky sexually assaulting a 10-year-old in the showers at Penn State's athletics complex.
    [Show full text]
  • President James Linksz to Step Down Next Year
    Bucks county community college The week of November 18, 2011 Bucks-news.com Volume: 48 Issue: 7 president James linksz to step down next year By: Melissa FleishMan, large accomplishments during Michael BercheM and his time at the college, includ- dan perez ing the addition of the Lower Centurion Staff and upper bucks campuses, on nov. 11, bucks President and the renovation of the Dr. James Linksz announced newtown campus. that he will retire in 2012 after before coming to bucks, Dr. James J. Linksz in his office on campus. Photo by Joshua m. rosenau serving the college for nearly Linksz held positions at other “there were lots of exciting over $10 million. these tech- sure on the students,” he said. 20 years. schools. he was the founding things that these community nology advancements include “We go out to the community Linksz, who has been at the dean at rappahannock college organizations were updating campus infrastruc- to try and raise money for school since July of 1992, Community College before doing in terms of working ture and buildings like the these scholarships while oth- made the announcement at the serving as a dean and profes- with people in their commu- 1996 opening of a new music ers are asking for those same school’s board of trustees sor of art at Catonsville nities and people in various building, the Gateway dollars.” meeting at the Lower bucks Community College in stages of their lives,” he said. Center’s creation in 1999 and Following his retirement Campus in bristol. maryland. the journey at bucks has the opening of the Wellness announcement, Linksz indi- “When I came to bCCC, I Linksz also was the been one filled with accom- Center in 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Covering the Scandal in 140 Characters: a Case Study of Twitter’S Role in Coverage of the Penn State Saga
    International Journal of Sport Communication, 2012, 5, 384-402 © 2012 Human Kinetics, Inc. www.IJSC-Journal.com CASE STUDY Covering the Scandal in 140 Characters: A Case Study of Twitter’s Role in Coverage of the Penn State Saga Jimmy Sanderson Clemson University, USA Marion E. Hambrick University of Louisville, USA This case study explored how sports journalists used Twitter to cover allegations about former Penn State University assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky sexually abusing young boys. A content analysis of 1652 tweets from 151 sports journalists was conducted. Analysis revealed that sports journalists used Twitter in the following ways: a) offering commentary, b) breaking news, c) interactivity, d) linking to content, and e) promotion. The results suggest that Twitter serves as an additional venue for sports journalists to frame stories; however, their behav- ior in this venue blurs professional and personal boundaries as they mock fans and promote their competitors. The analysis further suggests that the immediacy with which news breaks on Twitter places sports journalists and sports media organizations into a dialectic between “being first” and “being accurate” when reporting news. Keywords: Twitter, sports journalism, social media On November 5, 2011, the sports world was rocked by news that former Pennsylvania State University (PSU) assistant football coach Gerald “Jerry” San- dusky was being charged with sexual abuse of minors. Testimony from a grand jury investigation revealed numerous accusations against Sandusky—specifically that he had molested 10 boys during a 15-year period—with some of the abuse alleged to have occurred at Penn State facilities (Chapell, 2011). One of the more prominent allegations involved assistant football coach Mike McQueary (then a graduate-assistant) who reported that in 2002 he personally witnessed Sandusky engage in sexual activity with a young boy in the football facility’s showers.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Times 1 November 5, 2011 Former Coach at Penn State Is Charged with Abuse by MARK VIERA
    New York Times 1 November 5, 2011 Former Coach at Penn State Is Charged With Abuse By MARK VIERA A former defensive coordinator for the Penn State football team was arrested Saturday on charges of sexually abusing eight boys across a 15-year period. Jerry Sandusky, 67, who had worked with needy children through his Second Mile foundation, was arraigned and released on $100,000 bail after being charged with 40 counts related to sexual abuse of young boys. Two top university officials — Gary Schultz, the senior vice president for finance and business, and Tim Curley, the athletic director — were charged Saturday with perjury and failure to report to authorities what they knew of the allegations, as required by state law. “This is a case about a sexual predator who used his position within the university and community to repeatedly prey on young boys,” the Pennsylvania attorney general, Linda Kelly, said in a statement. Mr. Sandusky was an assistant defensive coach to Joe Paterno, the coach with the most career victories in major college football, who helped propel Penn State to the top tiers of the sport. Until now, the Big Ten university had one of the most sterling images in college athletics, largely thanks to Mr. Paterno and his success in 46 seasons as head coach. A grand jury said that when Mr. Paterno learned of one allegation of abuse in 2002, he immediately reported it to Mr. Curley. The grand jury did not implicate Mr. Paterno in any wrongdoing,though it was unclear if he ever followed up on his initial conversation with Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Nailed to the Crossbar: from the NCAA–Penn State Consent Decree to the Joe Paterno Family Lawsuit
    International Journal of Sport Communication, 2019, 12, 130–132 https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2018-0139 © 2019 Human Kinetics, Inc. BOOK REVIEW Nailed to the Crossbar: From the NCAA–Penn State Consent Decree to the Joe Paterno Family Lawsuit Edited by Ronald A. Smith. Published 2018 by Mt. Nittany Press. 263 pp. ISBN: 978-1-63233-409-1 Reviewed by Lauren McCoy, Western Kentucky University, USA In Nailed to the Crossbar: From the NCAA–Pennsylvania State University (Penn State) Consent Decree to the Joe Paterno Family Lawsuit, sport historian Ronald A. Smith highlights an insider look into the aftermath of the Jerry Sandusky child-abuse scandal using the history of the Pennsylvania State University (Penn State). The specific nature of this book does not make it an ideal fit as a primary reading in a sport management or sport communication course. It works best for casual reading but could also be used as secondary reading in courses discussing intercollegiate athletic administration, ethics, or sport history. While the history presented in the book highlights the culture that led to the university’s mistakes both during and after the scandal, the main focus is to call out the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). This book provides details about how the NCAA capitalized on the negative publicity to force a consent decree on Penn State that was ultimately reversed when challenged. The evidence provided throughout the book makes it clear how much this decree did not follow proper NCAA enforcement procedure, but more detail could have helped explain these failures. For example, Smith highlights a lack of due process in his argument that the NCAA’s consent decree was flawed from its inception.
    [Show full text]
  • THE INVESTIGATION Why Did It Take 3 Years for Charges?
    5 NOVEMBER 14, 2011 THE INVESTIGATION Why did it take 3 years for charges? BY SARA GANIM l The Patriot-News STATE COLLEGE l nvestigations are not perfect. They are fluid beings that change and evolve. And a com- plex probe involving multiple victims, dozens of witnesses and Ithousands of pages of documents can sometimes take three years. Former Penn State football coach Jerry Sandusky was indicted on 40 counts related to child sex abuse in an investigation launched in late 2008. One of the most frequent questions has been: Did the investigation need to take that long? The grand-jury presentment alleges that Sandusky victimized eight boys as young as 7 years old, from as far back as 1994. But 15 months had gone by before officials added enough manpower to find that out. There were earlier chances to bring him to the attention of law enforce- ment. Clues seem to have been ig- nored in 1995 and 1999, an alleged vic- tim came forward in 1998, and adults allegedly witnessed sexual assaults by Sandusky in 2000 and 2002. Then in 2008, Victim One came forward and was believed. Sandusky forcibly performed oral sex on him met the Clinton County boy through more than 20 times, and forced him to The Second Mile, the charity for kids perform oral sex on Sandusky. he had founded in 1977. The grand-jury account is a chilling At the time, Sandusky was a volun- tale. teer football coach at Central Moun- At first, the case shuffled through tain High School and had frequent the legal system.
    [Show full text]