DOCSLIB.ORG

Courting Disaster

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Courting Disaster COURTING DISASTER: THE MISRULE OF LAW IN BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA 25 March 2002 Balkans Report No. 127 Sarajevo/Brussels TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................1 II. THE LEGAL CONTEXT................................................................................................................................4 A. POST-WAR LEGAL AND JUDICIAL REFORM.........................................................................................5 B. INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS ........................................................................................................8 1. Independent Judicial Commission (IJC) ........................................................................................8 2. Office of the High Representative (OHR)......................................................................................9 3. UN Mission in Bosnia & Herzegovina (UNMIBH).....................................................................10 4. Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE)....................................................10 5. Council of Europe (CoE) .............................................................................................................10 6. American Bar Association and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) .11 C. THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY CAN DO BETTER .......................................................................11 III. DISTRIBUTORS OF JUSTICE....................................................................................................................12 A. THE ENTITIES .......................................................................................................................................13 1. The Federation .............................................................................................................................13 2. Republika Srpska .........................................................................................................................17 3. What Is to be Done?.....................................................................................................................17 B. CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS ..................................................................................................................18 C. HUMAN RIGHTS ....................................................................................................................................21 1. Human Rights Chamber...............................................................................................................21 2. Ombudsmen .................................................................................................................................23 D. THE STATE COURT ...............................................................................................................................25 IV. CRIMINAL LAW REFORM........................................................................................................................26 A. THE SCOPE OF CHANGE.......................................................................................................................26 B. INTERNATIONAL AND INTER-ENTITY LEGAL LIAISON......................................................................29 C. THE POLITICS OF LEGAL REFORM.....................................................................................................30 D. TOWARDS A BETTER FUTURE .............................................................................................................31 V. WAR CRIMES ...............................................................................................................................................31 A. THE INADEQUACIES OF ENTITY-BASED JUSTICE ..............................................................................32 B. THE ROLE OF THE STATE COURT.......................................................................................................33 C. OTHER CHALLENGES IN STORE ..........................................................................................................34 VI. PROFESSIONALISING THE JUDICIARY ...............................................................................................36 A. THE FAILINGS OF COMPREHENSIVE PROFESSIONAL REVIEW .........................................................36 1. What Went Wrong? .....................................................................................................................37 2. Problems with Appointments.......................................................................................................39 B. A BETTER WAY ....................................................................................................................................41 VII. PROFESSIONALISING THE LAWYERS AND THEIR EDUCATION.................................................44 A. THE LAWYERS AND THEIR PROFESSION ............................................................................................44 B. REFORMING LEGAL EDUCATION ........................................................................................................47 VIII. BRCKO: HOW THE EXCEPTION PROVES THE RULE ......................................................................49 A. INDEPENDENT JUDICIARY ....................................................................................................................49 B. BRCKO JUDICIAL COMMISSION...........................................................................................................50 C. THE COURTS .........................................................................................................................................50 D. REFORM OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURES ................................................................................................50 E. SHORTCOMINGS AND RELEVANCE OF THE BRCKO MODEL.............................................................51 1. Non-Cooperation with the Entities...............................................................................................52 2. Implementation Problems.............................................................................................................53 3. Prospects ......................................................................................................................................53 F. LESSONS ................................................................................................................................................54 IX. CONCLUSION...............................................................................................................................................55 APPENDICES A. GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS ...........................................................................................................58 B. MAP OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA ..................................................................................................59 C. ABOUT THE INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP .....................................................................................60 D. ICG REPORTS AND BRIEFING PAPERS................................................................................................61 E. ICG BOARD MEMBERS ........................................................................................................................65 ICG Balkans Report N° 127 25 March 2002 COURTING DISASTER: THE MISRULE OF LAW IN BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The law does not yet rule in Bosnia & Herzegovina. and external borders and national or confessional What prevail instead are nationally defined politics, divides. Their community of interest – in getting rich inconsistency in the application of law, corrupt and and defying the law – contrasts with the disunity of incompetent courts, a fragmented judicial space, half- those who want to uphold the law. baked or half-implemented reforms, and sheer negligence. Bosnia is, in short, a land where respect for Not only is Bosnia divided juridically into three, four, and confidence in the law and its defenders is weak. fourteen, or sixteen territorial-hierarchical jurisdictions (depending on how the one state, two entities, one Bosnians are unequal before the law, and they know it. autonomous district, eight unitary cantons, and two Exercise of the legal rights to repossess property or to mixed cantons are counted); it also has three separate reclaim a job too often depends on an individual’s sets of laws, two of which are replete with contradictory national identity – or that of the judge before whom she provisions. This fragmentation is a boon to criminals or he appears. Even when citizens do get justice in the and a pitfall for would-be reformers and enforcers of the courts, the chances of having decisions enforced can be law. slim, since the execution of court orders is often prolonged unlawfully or hedged in arbitrary conditions. The discontinuity of the territorial structure bequeathed Obtaining justice is also subject to geographical by the Dayton Peace Accords is compounded by chance. War crimes in one entity or canton are still Bosnia’s mixed legislative inheritance. The statute hailed as acts of heroism in another. books contain a multitude of outdated, overlapping and inconsistent
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina – a Parallel Crisis
    FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA – A PARALLEL CRISIS Europe Report N°209 – 28 September 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 II. COLLECTIVE RIGHTS VERSUS MAJORITY RULE ............................................. 3 A. ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS .......................................................................................... 3 B. OUTVOTING AND CONSENSUS ...................................................................................................... 5 C. PROTECTING VITAL NATIONAL INTERESTS .................................................................................. 6 III. ETHNIC INTERESTS AND REPRESENTATION ..................................................... 8 A. THE BOSNIAKS ............................................................................................................................ 8 B. THE BOSNIAN CROATS ............................................................................................................... 10 C. SERBS, BOSNIANS, MUSLIMS AND “OTHERS” ............................................................................. 10 IV. INSTITUTIONAL PARALYSIS .................................................................................. 11 A. CRISIS IN THE FBIH GOVERNMENT ............................................................................................ 11 B. LEGAL MAZES,
    [Show full text]
  • This Is How It All Began... Learn More About the Centre Of
    Centre of Cultivating Dialogue 1997 – 2016 THIS IS HOW IT ALL BEGAN... Back in 1997, a handful of enthusiasts initiated a program one hardly could have predicted for bright future considering the political, economic and educational situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Differences and divisions in the country were much more pronounced than today, which was especially noticed in educational program. However, sixteen years later the program can boast with a number of activities and participants to be envied by many, even most respected international programs. The first teachers to be involved in the program could not have even imagined they would be a part of the team that would participate in activities like seminars, meetings, round table discussions, and summer camps, debate activities in schools, TV debates, and world championships. Even less could they imagine that these activities would become a matter of tradition, one that future generations can look up to and admire. Since then more than 350 high school teachers from 75 Bosnian towns were educated through, on average, somewhat less than 150 activities per year. The program itself was obviously not created for teachers, but first and foremost for the benefit of young people in BiH. The goal has been to educate and train young people in debating skills and consequently in democracy and tolerance, which can be applied daily. This is Centre of Cultivating Dialogue, a program which sets debate as a contemporary method of education, through direct cooperation of all participants and constant rhetoric, cross examination, argumentation, research exercises… The total number of people involved in the aforementioned activities has grown to 33.000 and all of them have at least some experience they use today.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE BUILDING in DEEPLY DIVIDED SOCIETIES BEYOND DAYTON in BOSNIA Sofia Sebastian Aparicio
    STATE BUILDING IN DEEPLY DIVIDED SOCIETIES BEYOND DAYTON IN BOSNIA Sofia Sebastian Aparicio A Dissertation Submitted to the Department of Government of the London School of Economics in Fulfillment of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Government London School of Economics October 2009 UMI Number: U615B05 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615B05 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 T tte B S q (9 0 ot Porttce1 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Elections in Bosnia and Herzegovina (7 October 2012)
    The Congress of Local and Regional Authorities Chamber of Local Authorities 24th SESSION Strasbourg, 19-21 mars 2013 CPL(24)3PROV 20 février 2013 Local elections in Bosnia and Herzegovina (7 October 2012) Bureau of the Congress Rapporteur: Amy KOOPMANSCHAP, Netherlands (L,SOC1) Draft Resolution (for vote) ....................................................................................................................... 2 Draft Recommendation (for vote) ............................................................................................................ 3 Explanatory Memorandum (for vote) ...................................................................................................... 5 Summary The Congress appointed a delegation to observe the local elections in Bosnia and Herzegovina on 7 October 2012, deploying 9 teams around the country on that day. The Committee of the Regions of the European Union accepted the Congress’ invitation to join the delegation with four members. In general the delegation observed that election day proceeded smoothly and the Central Election Commission (CEC) was well prepared. Improvements had been made after the last local elections in 2008, nevertheless the Congress makes further recommendations, in particular to professionalise the Election Committees and to reduce the political influence overall, including on domestic observers. Furthermore, clarification is required as to those who are able to vote after the Central Voters Register has closed, and this also has an impact on the date
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Monitoring of Local and Regional Democracy in Bosnia and Herzegovina
    26th SESSION Strasbourg, 25-27 March 2014 CG(26)13FINAL 27 March 2014 Post-monitoring of local and regional democracy in Bosnia and Herzegovina Rapporteurs: 1 Jean-Marie BELLIARD, France (R, EPP/CCE) Beat HIRS, Switzerland (L, ILDG) Resolution 369 (2014) ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Recommendation 356 (2014) ............................................................................................................................. 4 Explanatory memorandum ................................................................................................................................. 6 Summary This is the first post-monitoring report on local and regional democracy in Bosnia and Herzegovina. It emphasises the efforts made to improve the legislative framework, which now explicitly mentions the Charter. The rapporteurs welcome the carrying out of the population census in order to improve the delivery of public services at local level and are delighted that the authorities have expressed agreement about the need to ensure that legislation is consistent where local self-government is concerned. However, the report does express some concerns about the lack of measures in response to Recommendation 324, relating in particular to the absence of constitutional reform which would safeguard citizens’ fundamental rights. The report also highlights a lack of action in respect of the recognition of municipal property and the improvement of
    [Show full text]
  • The Dynamics of Conflict in the Multi-Ethnic State of Bosnia and Herzegovina
    STUDY The Dynamics of Conflict in the Multi-ethnic State of Bosnia and Herzegovina Country Conflict-Analysis Study TIMO KIvIMäKI, MARINA KRAMeR AND PAUl PASCH March 2012 Timo Kivimäki, Marina Kramer and Paul Pasch The Dynamics of COnFlict In the MUlti-ethnic State of Bosnia AnD HerzegovInA SarajEvO, 2012. Title: The Dynamics of Conflict in the Multi-ethnic State of Bosnia and Herzegovina Authors: Timo Kivimäki, Marina Kramer and Paul Pasch Published by: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) Kupreška 20 71 000 Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina Tel.: +387 (0)33 722-010 E-mail: [email protected] www.fes.ba © Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Responsible: Paul Pasch Proofreading: Gwen jones DTP: Filip Andronik CIP - Katalogizacija u publikaciji nacionalna i univerzitetska biblioteka Bosne i Hercegovine, Sarajevo 323.1(497.6) KIvIMÄKI, Timo The dynamic of conflict in the multi-ethnic State of Bosnia and Herzegovina : country conflict-analysis study / Timo Kivimäki, Marina Kramer and Paul Pasch. - Sarajevo : Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, 2012. - 127 str. : graf. prikazi ; 30 cm Bibliografija: str. 117-122 i uz tekst. ISBn 978-9958-884-17-7 1. Kramer, Marina 2. Pasch, Paul COBISS.BH-ID 19946502 The Dynamics of Conflict in the Multi-ethnic State of Bosnia and Herzegovina Country Conflict-Analysis Study TIMO KIvIMäKI, MARINA KRAMeR AND PAUl PASCH SarajEvO, 2012. TIMO KIvIMäKI, MARINA KRAMeR AND PAUl PASCH | THe DYNAMICS Of CONflICT IN THe MUlTI-eTHNIC State Of BOSNIA AND HeRzeGOvINA Table of Contents foreword ...........................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Waiting for a Miracle Is the Most Conservative Option
    Waiting for a miracle? The politics of constitutional change in Bosnia and Herzegovina February 3rd 2004 Since ESI released its proposal for a process of constitutional change in Bosnia and Herzegovina three weeks ago,1 a lively public debate has emerged. There have been extensive discussions on Bosnian television and in newspapers and magazines in Sarajevo, Banja Luka and Mostar. The reactions have not divided along traditional ethnic lines, with supporters and critics appearing on all sides. This new, intense debate on constitutional reform has been noted in the international press (International Herald Tribune, 13 January and 3 February; the Swiss Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 21 January).2 Most importantly, there has been an immediate reaction from the very politicians in Bosnia who alone would be able to initiate a process of constitutional change. One of the main governing parties in the Federation, the HDZ, has embraced the vision of a three- layered Bosnian Federation (based on its existing ten cantons, the Republika Srpska and the District of Brcko) as its own and has prepared draft legislation to initiate a process of step-by-step reform. Publicly distancing himself from calls for a third entity, Barisa Colak, HDZ president and state government minister, has suggested that the Federation could be abolished within three years. As the HDZ enters into discussions with its principal coalition partners, there is now a real possibility that a process of negotiated yet fundamental constitutional change could begin in 2004. The ESI proposal for abolishing the Federation and creating a simplified, federal structure of twelve units was first introduced on 8 January by the Sarajevo weekly BIH Dani, which described it as “a brilliant idea for getting out of the post-war constitutional blind alley which paralyses progress.” It received immediate support from the Federation president, Niko Lozancic (Veþernji List, 12 January 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Legacy of the ICTY in the Former Yugoslavia ’S Legacy, Legacy, ’S Judges Y Judges Y Ugoslavia
    L EGACY OF OF EGACY Legacy of the This publication gathers together transcripts of the proceedings of two conferences on The Legacy of the ICTY in the former Yugoslavia convened in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Zagreb, Croatia, on 6 and 8 November 2012, respectively, by the Outreach Programme ICTY in the former of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. TH Over 250 people attended the conferences, including ICTY judges and staff, officials from national judiciaries, experts on transitional E Yugoslavia justice issues, journalists, academics, NGO representatives and IC international officials from across Bosnia and Herzegovina and T Y Conference proceedings Croatia. Participants discussed the Tribunal’s achievements to date I Sarajevo, 6 November 2012 and the legacy the ICTY will leave behind to those most directly N Zagreb, 8 November 2012 affected by its work – the citizens of the former Yugoslavia. TH E FOR E Four panel discussions saw participants addressing the Tribunal’s role in transitional justice processes, the scope of the ICTY’s legacy, the importance of regional access to the Tribunal’s archives, and M the future responsibilities of local and international accountability ER ER mechanisms, including the Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals (MICT). Y UGOSLAVIA Legacy of the ICTY in the former Yugoslavia Conference proceedings Sarajevo 6 November 2012 Zagreb 8 November 2012 ICTY Outreach Programme The Hague 2013 Legacy of the ICTY in the former Yugoslavia TheLegacy of the ICTY in the former Yugoslavia conferences would not have been possible without the generous support of the governments of the Netherlands and Switzerland, and the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina and Terrorism
    Bosnia and Herzegovina and Terrorism IvoIvo LucicLucic ABSTRACT The author describes the causes and roots of terrorism in Bosnia and Hercegovina, all of which are deeply rooted in the former Yugoslav sys- tem. Yugoslavia, often idealized in the West as a model for today’s multi- ethnic ideology, supported, trained, and even gave refuge to terrorist groups around the world. Yugoslavia earned approximately 700 million dollars a year selling weapons to “non-aligned” countries. In addition to its problematic activities in the area of foreign affairs, the Yugoslav communist government committed terrorist acts against its own citizens in the diaspora who opposed Yugoslav policies. Between 1945-1990, it organized the murder of 73 Croatian emigrants. With the disintegration of Yugoslavia, five new states emerged. One is Bosnia and Hercegovina. The author describes the birth and develop- ment of terrorist groups in this country, placing emphasis on today’s most dangerous form, Islamic terrorism, which is supported by the Muslim gov- ernment in Bosnia and Hercegovina, and thousands of “mujahedeen” who arrived during the war in Bosnia and Hercegovina to fight for Islam. Since the end of the war, Bosnia and Hercegovina has been a unde- clared protectorate. The international community holds the most power, but also carries the most responsibility for the situation in this country. Many terrorism issues have not been resolved, often because political problems are con- cealed in order to maintain the image of an ideal multi-ethnic community and create the impression that the creators of the Dayton Agreement have succeeded. The author warns that such a view toward terrorism is extremely dangerous, and that political trials such as the Leutar case are unacceptable in the democratic world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Misrule of Law in Bosnia & Herzegovina
    COURTING DISASTER: THE MISRULE OF LAW IN BOSNIA & HERZEGOVINA 25 March 2002 Balkans Report No. 127 Sarajevo/Brussels TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................1 II. THE LEGAL CONTEXT................................................................................................................................4 A. POST-WAR LEGAL AND JUDICIAL REFORM.........................................................................................5 B. INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS ........................................................................................................8 1. Independent Judicial Commission (IJC) ........................................................................................8 2. Office of the High Representative (OHR)......................................................................................9 3. UN Mission in Bosnia & Herzegovina (UNMIBH).....................................................................10 4. Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE)....................................................10 5. Council of Europe (CoE) .............................................................................................................10 6. American Bar Association and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) .11
    [Show full text]
  • Promo Ccd 14102013-1
    Centre of Cultivating dialogue 1997 – 2013 THIS IS HOW IT ALL BEGAN... Back in 1997, a handful of enthusiasts initiated a program one hardly could have predicted for bright future considering the political, economic and educational situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Differences and divisions in the country were much more pronounced than today, which was especially noticed in educational program. However, sixteen years later the program can boast with a number of activities and participants to be envied by many, even most respected international programs. The first teachers to be involved in the program could not have even imagined that they would be a part of the team that would participate in activities like seminars, meetings, round table discussions, summer camps, debate activities at the school level, TV debates, and world championships. Even less could they imagine that these activities would become a matter of tradition, one that future generations can look up to and admire. Since then more than 350 high school teachers from 75 Bosnian towns were educated through, on average, somewhat less than 150 activities per year. The program itself was obviously not created for teachers, but first and foremost for the benefit of young people in BiH. The goal has been to educate and train young people in debating skills and consequently in democracy and tolerance, which can be applied daily. This is Centre of Cultivating Dialogue, a program which sets debate as a contemporary method of education, through direct cooperation of all participants and constant rhetoric, cross examination, argumentation, research exercises… The total number of people involved in the aforementioned activities has grown to 33.000 and all of them have at least some experience they use today.
    [Show full text]