Public Notice
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Appendix a Stations Transitioning on June 12
APPENDIX A STATIONS TRANSITIONING ON JUNE 12 DMA CITY ST NETWORK CALLSIGN LICENSEE 1 ABILENE-SWEETWATER SWEETWATER TX ABC/CW (D KTXS-TV BLUESTONE LICENSE HOLDINGS INC. 2 ALBANY GA ALBANY GA NBC WALB WALB LICENSE SUBSIDIARY, LLC 3 ALBANY GA ALBANY GA FOX WFXL BARRINGTON ALBANY LICENSE LLC 4 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ADAMS MA ABC WCDC-TV YOUNG BROADCASTING OF ALBANY, INC. 5 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY NBC WNYT WNYT-TV, LLC 6 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY ABC WTEN YOUNG BROADCASTING OF ALBANY, INC. 7 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY FOX WXXA-TV NEWPORT TELEVISION LICENSE LLC 8 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY PITTSFIELD MA MYTV WNYA VENTURE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, LLC 9 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY SCHENECTADY NY CW WCWN FREEDOM BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK LICENSEE, L.L.C. 10 ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY SCHENECTADY NY CBS WRGB FREEDOM BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK LICENSEE, L.L.C. 11 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM CW KASY-TV ACME TELEVISION LICENSES OF NEW MEXICO, LLC 12 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM UNIVISION KLUZ-TV ENTRAVISION HOLDINGS, LLC 13 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM PBS KNME-TV REGENTS OF THE UNIV. OF NM & BD.OF EDUC.OF CITY OF ALBUQ.,NM 14 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM ABC KOAT-TV KOAT HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC. 15 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM NBC KOB-TV KOB-TV, LLC 16 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM CBS KRQE LIN OF NEW MEXICO, LLC 17 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE ALBUQUERQUE NM TELEFUTURKTFQ-TV TELEFUTURA ALBUQUERQUE LLC 18 ALBUQUERQUE-SANTA FE CARLSBAD NM ABC KOCT KOAT HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC. -
Brief for Respondents
No. 10-1293 In the Morris Tyler Moot Court of Appeals at Yale FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETITIONERS v. ABC, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT BRIEF FOR THE RESPONDENTS LEWIS BOLLARD JONATHAN SIEGEL Counsel for Respondents The Yale Law School 127 Wall Street New Haven, CT 06511 (203) 432–4992 QUESTIONS PRESENTED The FCC forbids the broadcasting of indecent speech, defined “as material that, in context, depicts or describes sexual or excretory activities or organs in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards for the broadcast medium.” J.A. 49. The questions presented are: 1. Whether the FCC’s definition of indecency violates the Fifth Amendment because it is impermissibly vague. 2. Whether the FCC’s ban on indecency violates the First Amendment because it is not narrowly tailored and because it does not require scienter for liability. i PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDINGS Petitioners are the Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America. Respondents who were petitioners in the court of appeals in Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. FCC are: Fox Television Stations, Inc., CBS Broadcasting Inc., WLS Television, Inc., KTRK Television, Inc., KMBC Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc., and ABC Inc. Respondents who were intervenors in the court of appeals in Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. FCC are: NBC Universal, Inc., NBC Telemundo License Co., NBC Television Affiliates, FBC Television Affiliates Association, CBS Television Network Affiliates, Center for the Creative Community, Inc., doing business as Center for Creative Voices in Media, Inc., and ABC Television Affiliates Association. -
Return of Organization Exempt from Income
efile GRAPHIC p rint - DO NOT PROCESS As Filed Data - DLN: 93493321035384 Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax OMB No 1545-0047 Form 990 Under section 501 ( c), 527, or 4947 ( a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code ( except private foundations) 2O1 3 Do not enter Social Security numbers on this form as it may be made public By law, the IRS Department of the Treasury Open generally cannot redact the information on the form Internal Revenue Service Inspection - Information about Form 990 and its instructions is at www.IRS.gov/form990 For the 2013 calendar year, or tax year beginning 06-01-2013 , 2013, and ending 05-31-2014 C Name of organization B Check if applicable D Employer identification number EQUITY LEAGUE HEALTH TRUST FUND f Address change 13-6092981 Doing Business As • Name change fl Initial return Number and street (or P 0 box if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite E Telephone number 165 WEST 46TH STREET 14TH FLOOR p Terminated (212)869-9380 (- Amended return City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code NEW YORK, NY 10036 1 Application pending G Gross receipts $ 104,708,930 F Name and address of principal officer H(a) Is this a group return for Arthur Drechsler subordinates? 1 Yes F No H(b) Are all subordinates 1 Yes F No included? I Tax-exempt status F_ 501(c)(3) F 501(c) ( 9 I (insert no (- 4947(a)(1) or F_ 527 If "No," attach a list (see instructions) J Website : - www equityleague org H(c) Group exemption number 0- K Form of organization 1 Corporation 1 Trust F_ Association (- Other 0- L Year of formation 1960 M State of legal domicile NY Summary 1 Briefly describe the organization's mission or most significant activities TO PROVIDE HEALTH AND OTHER BENEFITS TO ELIGIBLE PARTICIPANTS w 2 Check this box Of- if the organization discontinued its operations or disposed of more than 25% of its net assets 3 Number of voting members of the governing body (Part VI, line 1a) . -
The Quarterly Publication of the Santa Fe Trail Association Volume 29 ♦ Number 2 February 2015
The Quarterly Publication of the Santa Fe Trail Association volume 29 ♦ number 2 February 2015 Photo by American Images Custom Aerial Photography® Marshfield, WI The Kanza in the Civil War ♦ page 10 Three Trails Conference Schedule and Registration ♦ page 15 Documenting the Santa Fe Trail in Kansas ♦ page 19 The American Invasion of New Mexico and Mexican Merchants ♦ page 23 On The Cover: French Frank’s Trail Segment This low-level oblique aerial photo was taken June 3, 2008, looking east at French Frank’s Trail Segment on the Santa Fe Trail (SFT) northwest of Lehigh, Kansas. Since the photo was taken, all the trees along the creek have been removed. The photographed area is 1/4 mile left-to-right in the foreground, and 1/2 mile from the bottom of the photo to the dark brown field in the middle distance. The curvilinear features running diagonally across the pasture are SFT swales. There are five or six sets of parallel swales, as dif- ferent locations were sought out over the years to cross French Creek. A DAR marker is located where the swales can be seen intersecting the road on the left margin of the photo. This Trail Segment is a National Park Service “Certified Site” and is on both the State and National Registers of Historic Places. This is the loca- tion of the Cottonwood Holes (some are visible just to the right of center of the photo) which were a source of water and provided a noon camping stop on the SFT. This was the first water on the SFT westward from Cot- tonwood Crossing, and the water appeared in depressions or holes both in and alongside the creek. -
Summary of Participants Total Pending Criteria and but Multi Chs
Potentially grantable Propose dismissal REC NETWORKS - AUCTION 83 LIST 1 LIST 2 LIST 3 LIST 4 LIST 5 Meets LPFM Meets criteria Meets LPFM Does not meet Proposes Summary of Participants Total pending criteria and but multi chs. criteria and LPFM criteria facilities of Potential Grant Total counts for each list by party. applications singleton at same site possibly MX excess kw Ratio 1400 INC. 22 2 1 7 12 0 45.5% ACE OF HEARTS DISC JOCKEY SERVICE INC. 3 0 0 0 3 0 0.0% ADVANCE MINISTRIES, INC. D/B/A NEW LIFE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL 20 5 0 8 7 0 65.0% AIR-FREE WIRELESS, INC. 9 0 0 5 4 0 55.6% AIRPORT INVESTORS L.P. 4 0 0 0 4 0 0.0% AIRWAVES, INC. 3 0 0 0 3 0 0.0% ALABAMA CHRISTIAN RADIO INC 2 0 0 2 0 0 100.0% ALASKA EDUCATIONAL RADIO SYSTEM, INC. 43 1 17 13 9 3 72.1% ALASKA PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 2 0 0 0 2 0 0.0% ALASKA VAILLAGE MISSIONS, INC. 1 0 0 1 0 0 100.0% ALBANY SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH 1 0 0 0 1 0 0.0% ALC COMMUNICATIONS 1 0 0 1 0 0 100.0% ALELUYA CHRISTIAN BROADCASTING, INC. 73 0 0 0 73 0 0.0% ALLAN HANSEL 1 0 0 0 1 0 0.0% ALPINE BROADCASTING, LTD. 2 0 0 2 0 0 100.0% AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL BROADCASTING, INC. 11 0 0 4 7 0 36.4% AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION 26 3 1 4 15 3 30.8% AMERICOM LAS VEGAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1 0 0 0 1 0 0.0% AMFM RADIO LICENSES, LLC 8 0 0 2 6 0 25.0% ANNA TRAPANI 1 0 0 0 1 0 0.0% ANTONIO DELGADO 2 0 0 0 1 1 0.0% APPALACHIAN EDUCATIONAL COMMUNICATION CORPORATION 6 0 0 2 4 0 33.3% APPALSHOP, INC 4 1 0 0 3 0 25.0% ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS FOR/ON BEHALF OF NORTHERN AZ UNIV. -
All Full-Power Television Stations by Dma, Indicating Those Terminating Analog Service Before Or on February 17, 2009
ALL FULL-POWER TELEVISION STATIONS BY DMA, INDICATING THOSE TERMINATING ANALOG SERVICE BEFORE OR ON FEBRUARY 17, 2009. (As of 2/20/09) NITE HARD NITE LITE SHIP PRE ON DMA CITY ST NETWORK CALLSIGN LITE PLUS WVR 2/17 2/17 LICENSEE ABILENE-SWEETWATER ABILENE TX NBC KRBC-TV MISSION BROADCASTING, INC. ABILENE-SWEETWATER ABILENE TX CBS KTAB-TV NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC. ABILENE-SWEETWATER ABILENE TX FOX KXVA X SAGE BROADCASTING CORPORATION ABILENE-SWEETWATER SNYDER TX N/A KPCB X PRIME TIME CHRISTIAN BROADCASTING, INC ABILENE-SWEETWATER SWEETWATER TX ABC/CW (DIGITALKTXS-TV ONLY) BLUESTONE LICENSE HOLDINGS INC. ALBANY ALBANY GA NBC WALB WALB LICENSE SUBSIDIARY, LLC ALBANY ALBANY GA FOX WFXL BARRINGTON ALBANY LICENSE LLC ALBANY CORDELE GA IND WSST-TV SUNBELT-SOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD ALBANY DAWSON GA PBS WACS-TV X GEORGIA PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ALBANY PELHAM GA PBS WABW-TV X GEORGIA PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ALBANY VALDOSTA GA CBS WSWG X GRAY TELEVISION LICENSEE, LLC ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ADAMS MA ABC WCDC-TV YOUNG BROADCASTING OF ALBANY, INC. ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY NBC WNYT WNYT-TV, LLC ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY ABC WTEN YOUNG BROADCASTING OF ALBANY, INC. ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY FOX WXXA-TV NEWPORT TELEVISION LICENSE LLC ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY AMSTERDAM NY N/A WYPX PAXSON ALBANY LICENSE, INC. ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY PITTSFIELD MA MYTV WNYA VENTURE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, LLC ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY SCHENECTADY NY CW WCWN FREEDOM BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK LICENSEE, L.L.C. ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY SCHENECTADY NY PBS WMHT WMHT EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY SCHENECTADY NY CBS WRGB FREEDOM BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK LICENSEE, L.L.C. -
Broadcasters in the Internet Age
G.research, LLC November 27, 2018 One Corporate Center Rye, NY 10580-1422 g.research Tel (914) 921-5150 www.gabellisecurities.com Broadcasters in the Internet Age Brett Harriss G.research, LLC 2018 (914) 921-8335 -Please Refer To Important Disclosures On The Last Page Of This Report- G.research, LLC November 27, 2018 One Corporate Center Rye, NY 10580-1422 g.research Tel (914) 921-5150 www.gabellisecurities.com OVERVIEW The television industry is experiencing a tectonic shift of viewership from linear to on-demand viewing. Vertically integrated behemoths like Netflix and Amazon continue to grow with no end in sight. Despite this, we believe there is a place in the media ecosystem for traditional terrestrial broadcast companies. SUMMARY AND OPINION We view the broadcasters as attractive investments. We believe there is the potential for consolidation. On April 20, 2017, the FCC reinstated the Ultra High Frequency (UHF) discount giving broadcasters with UHF stations the ability to add stations without running afoul of the National Ownership Cap. More importantly, the current 39% ownership cap is under review at the FCC. Given the ubiquitous presence of the internet which foster an excess of video options and media voices, we believe the current ownership cap could be viewed as antiquated. Should the FCC substantially change the ownership cap, we would expect consolidation to accelerate. Broadcast consolidation would have the opportunity to deliver substantial synergies to the industry. We would expect both cost reductions and revenue growth, primarily in the form of increased retransmission revenue, to benefit the broadcast stations and networks. -
Pne 197607.Pdf
cpc JUL Y, 1976 $1.00 \ '. \ . \ \ \ , COLORADO RAIL Annual NUMBER NINE Enjoy the COLOR & SOUND of THE AMERICAN FREEDOM TRAIN Number Nine in our On a more modern Track of the Cats details by popular series of Colorado note, the Prospector is the establishment of the Rail Annuals features the account of the Rio State-owned operation QNTERURBAN four different articles on Grande's ov ernight for the same D&RG nar 'PILMS Colorado railroad history . streamliner on the Den row gauge line that Jukes ver - Moffat Tunnel- Salt had photographed a half Tin Feathers & Gaso Lake City run - diesel century earlier. line Fumes is the story of powered and deluxe, and th e uniqu e Galloping 126 pages, 8112 x II. the pride of the Railroad. Geese motor trains that thoroughly research ed once plied the rails of the and profusely illustrated. Rio Grande Southern, the A Tribute to Fred Jukes legendary narrow gauge is a pictorial biography of Clothbound Deluxe POSTPAID that threaded through the great early-day pho rugged western slope tographer of the D&RG mountain terrain. narrow gauge, while $9.75 DEPT. N, BOX 10, Colorado Railroad Museum, GOLDEN COLO. 80401 Photo by F. Nicas Even with your silent projector, you can GREAT NEW BOOKS FROM INTERURBANS! enjoy the sights and sounds of being in the 2... cab and on the platform of this famous train, pulled by S.P. 4449, on its historical journey TReLLEYS Te THE SURF from Bakersfield, via the Tehachapi Loop and Mohave. BEFORE THE RED CARS CAME 'he G,.en CO" TROLLEYS TO THE SURF by W;II;om A. -
2010 Satellite Claims
2010 SATELLITE CLAIMS NO. CLAIMANTS NAME CITY STATE DATE RCV’D 1 Intermediary Copyright Royalty Services Washington DC 7-1-11 (2010 Gray TV Satellite) Gray Television Group, Inc. 2 Intermediary Copyright Royalty Services Washington DC 7-1-11 (2010 MLS Satellite); Major League Soccer, LLC 3 Intermediary Copyright Royalty Services Washington DC 7-1-11 (2010 Little League Satellite); Little League Baseball Incorporated 4 The John F. Kennedy Center for the Washington DC 7-1-11 Performing Arts 5 (JOINT) Intermediary Copyright Royalty Washington DC 7-1-11 Services (2010 Joint Program Suppliers) 6 (JOINT) Intermediary Copyright Royalty Washington DC 7-1-11 Services (2010 Devotional Satellite 7 (JOINT) Broadcast Music, Inc. New York NY 7-1-11 8 Multimedia Holdings Corporation McLean VA 7-1-11 (KARE-TV) 9 Jonathan T. McCants, Esq.; Coral Ridge Atlanta GA 7-1-11 Ministries Media, Inc. 10 WSYX Licensee, Inc. Columbus OH 7-1-11 11 Columbus (WTTE-TV) Licensee, Inc. Columbus OH 7-1-11 12 Multimedia Holdings Corporation McLean VA 7-5-11 (KUSA-TV) 13 Multimedia Holdings Corporation; McLean VA 7-5-11 KTVD-TV 14 (JOINT) CBS Studios, A CBS Company; Santa Monica CA 7-5-11 Republic Distribution Corp.; Worldivision Enterprises, Inc.; Big Ticket Productions, Inc.; Spelling Television Inc.; Republic Entertainment, Inc; Republic Entertainment, Inc; Republic Pictures Enterprises; Big Ticket Pictures, Inc.; Big Ticket Television, Inc.; Showtime Networks, Inc. 15 (JOINT) Paramount Pictures Corporation; Los Angeles CA 7-5-11 Melange Pictures, LLC; DW Studios L.L.C; fka Dreamworks L.L.C. 16 Philip R. -
Retransmission-Consent Outlook DIFFICULT and Costly
Retransmission-Consent Outlook DIFFICULT and Costly BY CHRIS CINNAMON, HEIDI SCHMID AND ADRIANA KISSEL n a video world where most operators deliver 150-plus channels, broad- cast stations represent no more than a small slice of channel lineups. Yet the carriage of a few broadcast channels involves a process that for many video providers, especially smaller ones, entails aggravating uncertainty, intense pressure and irrational cost increases. That process? IRetransmission consent. In about 12 months, video providers nationwide will receive certified “election letters” triggering the next round of retransmission-consent negotiations. The out- look for retransmission negotiations in 2011? Difficult and costly. To maximize the likelihood of success—and to minimize pain—preparation is key. Smaller provid- ers should begin preparations now. 32 RURALTELECOM > JULY-AUGUST 2010 ILLUSTRATION BY BRUCE MACPHERSON RTjuly.aug10.FINAL_cc.indd 32 6/18/10 10:07:11 AM RTjuly.aug10.FINAL_cc.indd 33 6/18/10 10:07:12 AM RETRANSMISSION CONSENT WHY NTCA IS CONCERNED About Comcast and NBC Universal By Steve Fravel, NTCA Manager, Video Services Those planning for retransmission-consent negotiations should keep an eye on the Comcast/NBC Universal merger, which could have ramifications for those negotiations. The merger between Comcast, the largest cable provider in the United States, and NBC Universal (NBCU), owner of national television network NBC, creates concern on several levels. Will multichannel video programming distributors (MVPDs) that compete with Comcast have access to the content cur- rently owned by NBC and Comcast at comparable and competitive terms? The fear is that Comcast will withhold access to “must have” content, or increase the licensing fees to unrealistic levels. -
United States Securities and Exchange Commission Schedule 14A Tegna Inc
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 SCHEDULE 14A (RULE 14a-101) INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Filed by the Registrant ☐ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☒ Check the appropriate box: ☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement ☐ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) ☐ Definitive Proxy Statement ☐ Definitive Additional Materials ☒ Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12 TEGNA INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) STANDARD GENERAL L.P. STANDARD GENERAL MASTER FUND L.P. SOOHYUNG KIM COLLEEN B. BROWN ELLEN MCCLAIN HAIME DEBORAH MCDERMOTT LAWRENCE WERT STEPHEN USHER DAVID GLAZEK MICHAEL PERRONE (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): ☒ No fee required. ☐ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: (5) Total fee paid: ☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. ☐ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. -
The Economics of Retransmission Consent
E MPIRIS L L C THE ECONOMICS OF RETRANSMISSION CONSENT † JEFFREY A. EISENACH , PH.D. March 2009 † Chairman and Managing Partner, Empiris LLC and Adjunct Professor, George Mason University Law School. I am grateful to several commenters for helpful suggestions. Any remaining errors are my own. Support for this paper was provided by the National Association of Broadcasters. THE ECONOMICS OF RETRANSMISSION CONSENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Congress created retransmission consent in 1992 to ensure that broadcasters would be able to negotiate in a free marketplace for fair compensation for their programming. Examining retransmission consent from an economic perspective, this study demonstrates that retransmission consent achieves Congress’ intended purpose of establishing a market based mechanism to ensure that broadcasters receive an economically efficient level of compensation for the value of their signals. This compensation ultimately benefits consumers by enriching the quantity, diversity, and quality of available programming, including local broadcast signals. In particular, the evidence demonstrates that: • The market for television programming is highly competitive. The sellers’ side of the video programming market (broadcasters) is relatively unconcentrated and is becoming less concentrated while the buyers’ side (the multichannel video program distributors market) is experiencing consolidation at both the national and local levels. In 2006, the four MVPDs with the largest shares served 63 percent of all MVPD subscribers, up from 50 percent in 2002. National networks depend on just four purchasers to reach nearly 70 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide. Thus, broadcasters do not have monopoly power, and are not in a position to extract excessive retransmission consent fees from cable operators or other program distributors.