DOCSLIB.ORG

January 2 1880 WILLS and BEQUESTS the Will, Dated March 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
January 2 1880 WILLS and BEQUESTS the Will, Dated March 2 January 2nd 1880 WILLS AND BEQUESTS The will, dated March 2, 1861, with two codicils thereto, dated June 14, 1862, and August 5, 1864, of Mr. Arthur Augustus Basch, late of Lloyd’s, underwriter, of Ewell, in the county of Surrey, and of Brighton, and who died on November 17 last, was proved on the 16th ult. by Mrs. Emma Basch, the widow, and surviving executrix, the personal estate being sworn under £100,000. The testator bequeaths to his widow all his furniture, plate, linen, china, and other effects in his dwelling-house, and an immediate legacy of £500; and he devises and appoints the residue of his real and personal estate to his trustees upon trust for sale, and as to two-thirds of the same in trust for all his children by his first wife, Mary Letitia, and as to the remaining one-third, upon trust to raise thereout £10,000, and pay the same to his widow, and as to the remainder of the one-third part, upon trust to permit her to receive the income thereof for life, and after her death for his children equally. January 14th 1880 On the 9th inst., at the residence of his son, G.R. Keeling, Epsom, ENOCH KEELING, formerly of Etruris, Staffordshire, aged 89 years. January 26th 1880 THE VOLUNTEERS It is now certain that there will be a review of the metropolitan Volunteer force and such other regiments as may be desirous of joining it next Easter Monday. The metropolitan commanding officers, it will be remembered, at their meeting on the 16th inst., appointed a committee for the purpose of ascertaining and reporting to a future meeting if a suitable site and the necessary railway facilities could be obtained. The negotiations have not progressed sufficiently to enable the committee to present their report, but from what has transpired, it is evident that the difficulties which have for a succession of years stood in the way of the organization of a field-day on a scale which would, at any rate, be an adequate representation of the metropolitan force have now, to a great extent, been removed. Major-General Higginson, C.B., Commanding the Home District, gave his permission and promised all the aid he could, as also to have a site which has on many occasions been utilized for brigade field-days – viz., Epsom-downs – inspected. The committee, through their hon. Secretary (Lieut. Col. Vickers, 2d London) placed themselves in communication with the Mayors of Brighton, Portsmouth, Dunstable, and other places, with the result that they have readily acquiesced in the idea, and promised all the assistance they can render. The Sussex-downs offer the best site for a sham fight, with the additional advantage of abundant accommodation for the troops at Brighton, and the decision as to whether the field-day will be held there again is anticipated with much interest. If the Brighton Company should consent to convey the Volunteers there is little doubt some 25,000 or 30,000 men would be present; and any damage done to the land would as in former years be repaid by the fund which it is usual to raise to compensate the farmers. Should it, however, be impossible to make adequate arrangements, the commanding officers will probably avail themselves of the offer of the Mayor and inhabitants of Dunstable, who have again offered the large area of land in the neighbourhood, to which the Great Northern Railway Company is willing to convey the troops upon the former rates and general conditions. Another site is open in the neighbourhood of Royston, where, it is stated, if necessary, the landowners, who placed their land at the disposal of the Volunteers two years ago would doubtless do so again this year under the same favourable conditions. January 30th 1880 WILLS AND BEQUESTS The will and codicil (both dated November 14 1879) of Mr. William Chamberlain Hood, M.D., formerly of South Lambeth, Surrey, afterwards of Dublin, but late of the Berners Hotel, Berners-street, Oxford-street, who died on the 16th ult., was proved on the 7th inst. by Samuel Leith Tomkins and Foster Wilfred Procter, the grandson, the executors, the personal estate being sworn under £45,000. The testator bequeaths £1,000 each to the Middlesex Hospital and the Medical Benevolent College at Epsom, in memory of his late wife; in each case the bequest is to be denominated “Ann Hood’s Legacy;” to his executor, Mr. Tomkins… February 10th 1880 BIRTHS On the 7th inst., at The Elms, Banstead-road, Ewell, Surrey, Mrs. CHARLES L SHAW – a girl. February 17th 1880 BIRTHS On the 14th Feb., at Ewell, Surrey, the wife of THOMAS MERCER, of a son. February 18th 1880 DEATHS On the 14th inst., at Randulph-terrace, Springfield-hill, Chelmsford, in her 58th year, ESTHER BAILEY, formerly of Ewell, Surrey. March 2nd 1880 DEATHS On the 29th Feb., at New Orleans, WILLIAM GEORGE ENTINCK, third son of the late HENRY DORLING, of Epsom aged 34 years. March 19th 1880 DEATHS On Saturday, the 13th March, 1880, at Epsom, miss EISDELL, aged 92 years. April 14th 1880 QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION (Sittings at Nisi Prius, at Westminster, before the LORD CHIEF JUSTICE and a Special Jury) HOWELL V. WEST AND ANOTHER This is an action brought to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract or duty in relation to a son, now deceased, of the plaintiff. The Solicitor-General, Mr. Bray, and Mr. Gore appeared for the plaintiff; Sir Henry James, Q.C., and Mr. Forbes were for the defendant Dr. West; Mr. Willis, Q.C., and Mr. Tindal Atkinson were for the other defendant, Mr. Jones. The further hearing of this part-heard case was resumed this morning. It is an action brought by the plaintiff, who is a medical man, residing at and practising in the neighbourhood of Wandsworth, against the head master of the Royal Medical Benevolent College, at Epsom, and Mr. Arthur O’Brien Jones, who is the medical officer of that school and the medical attendant of Dr. West, who has some 25 boarders in his house. The complaint of Mr. Howell against Dr. West is that the latter broke an agreement which he made undertaking that if the plaintiff should in 1877 send his son, Kyrle Howell, to be a boarder in his house, he would, in the case of his falling ill, nurse him in his own house and not send him to the school infirmary. Mr. Howell’s complaint against Mr. Jones is that the latter, having been requested by Dr. West, therein acting as the agent of the plaintiff, to attend upon the boy in an attack of scarlet fever which he had in 1879, had failed to use reasonable skill and care in his treatment of the case. The boy went to the school at Easter, 1877, and in February, 1879, having a sharp attack of scarlet fever, he was removed on the 6th of that month to the infectious ward of the school infirmary. Subsequently pyæmia set in, and he died on the 14th. Dr. West denies that the agreement relied upon by Mr. Howell was one which was to be binding on him in the case of the boy’s having an infectious fever, and the other defendant, Mr. Jones, traverses the plaintiff’s allegation as to his having failed to use proper care and skill in the case. [There was detailed coverage of this trial on the following three days until the verdict as below:] April 17th 1880 …give a verdict of £5 5s. for his client. In conclusion, his Lordship left, as regarded the defendant, Dr. West, three questions:- (1) Was there an express contract entered into by Dr. West, that even in the case of infectious disorder the plaintiff’s son should remain in defendant’s house? (2) Was there the absence of the exercise of a reasonable and proper discretion and of due and proper care in removing the boy at all? (3) Was there absence of due and proper care in the manner of his removal? (4) Or in the place to which he was removed? (5) Had the removal any injurious effect in hastening or aggravating the disease? As to the defendant Mr. A. O’Brien Jones, his Lordship left the following questions:- (1) Was there want of due skill and care in recommending the removal of the boy? (2) Or in carrying out the removal, including herein the state of the ward in which he was placed? (3) Or in treating the patient? (4) Had the removal any injurious effect in hastening or aggravating the disease? The jury retired to consider their verdict at a quarter-past 12, and, returning into court after an absence of half an hour, returned a verdict in favour of both the defendants, answering every one of the questions in their favour. His LORDSHIP then gave judgment accordingly. May 19th 1880 On the 15th inst., at Hessle House, Ewell, the wife of HENRY BROOKS, of a son. June 9th 1880 SURREY SESSIONS (Before Mr. HARDMAN, Chairman of the First Court) John Summers, 50, was indicted for stealing a gold watch value £50 from the person of Lieutenant W.F.A. Wallace, 53d Regiment, at Epsom, on the Derby day. The prosecutor was standing near the Grand Stand, when he felt a pull at his watch. He attempted to seize the prisoner, and called out “Pickpocket.” The case of his watch fell to the ground, and the watch was found in the hand of another man.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bulletin/Issue414 23/3/09 11:22 Page 1
    85029_SAS/Bulletin/Issue414 23/3/09 11:22 Page 1 Registered Charity No: 272098 ISSN 0585-9980 SURREY ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY CASTLE ARCH, GUILDFORD GU1 3SX Tel/ Fax: 01483 532454 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.surreyarchaeology.org.uk Bulletin 414 April 2009 ‘STRUTTING LIKE A PEACOCK’ (page 19) 85029_SAS/Bulletin/Issue414 23/3/09 11:22 Page 2 ARCHAEOLOGY AT HATCH FURLONG: Third Interim Report 2008 Jonathan Cotton & Harvey Sheldon Introduction A third season of exploratory archaeological work has been completed on the National Trust land at Hatch Furlong, Ewell. The site lies on the Upper Chalk of the North Downs and overlooks the springs around which the Roman and later settlement of Ewell developed. Although bad weather hampered the programme throughout, five trenches were evaluated between 18th April and 8th May 2008 by students from Birkbeck Faculty of Lifelong Learning, community archaeology volunteers working with Surrey County Archaeology Unit (SCAU), and weekend volunteers drawn from Epsom and Ewell History and Archaeology Society (EEHAS) and Surrey Archaeological Society (SyAS). Pupils from a number of local schools were conducted around the site, in addition to over three hundred visitors on a busy Bank Holiday Monday. As has become customary, this year’s investigations were filmed by members of the Epsom Cine and Video Society. The aim of the third season was to investigate areas adjacent to those previously examined at the southern end of the site. Furthermore the intention was to define more clearly the areas dug in the 1970s and glimpsed in Trenches 2 and 5 in 2006; to explore the post holes revealed in Trench 9 in 2007; and to complete the examination of the deeper of the two chalk-cut shafts (context [1005]) in Trench 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Surrey Small Blue Stepping Stones Project 2017 to 2019 Fiona Haynes Butterfly Conservation’S Surrey Small Blue Project Officer
    Report: Surrey Small Blue Stepping Stones Project 2017 to 2019 Fiona Haynes Butterfly Conservation’s Surrey Small Blue Project Officer Small Blue on Kidney Vetch by Martin D'arcy Butterfly Conservation, Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Wareham, Dorset BH20 5QP Company limited by guarantee, registered in England (2206468). Charity registered in England and Wales (254937) and in Scotland (SCO39268). Acknowledgements The Project Officer would like to thank all of the volunteers for their contributions to this project (and to Martin D’arcy, Gillian Elsom, Ken Elsom, Dom Greves and Jonathan Mitchell for the use of their photos in this report). Many thanks especially to Gail Jeffcoate, Bill Downey, Simon Saville and Harry Clarke for their invaluable input and support. Thank you to all of the organisations, landowners and land managers that have been part of this project and who continue to deliver good stewardship of the chalk Downs habitats. Butterfly Conservation would also like to thank all of our funders and partners for making this project possible: Veolia Environmental Trust Surrey Community Foundation Surrey Hills AONB Surrey and South West London Branch of Butterfly Conservation Individual donations from members and legacies The Lower Mole Project West Surrey Natural History Society Parish Councils of Shere, Abinger and West Horsley 1 Project Summary Butterfly Conservations’ Surrey Small Blue Project started in July 2017 and finished in July 2019. This report focusses on the management work that has been carried out, volunteer involvement and lessons learnt from the process, as well as plans and recommendations going forward. The project was made possible through funding provided by the Veolia Environmental Trust, the Surrey Community Foundation, Surrey Hills AONB, Surrey and SW London branch of Butterfly Conservation, individual donations and legacies from members, the Lower Mole Project, the West Surrey Natural History Society, and the parish councils of Abinger, Shere and West Horsley.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vision for Guildford Borough's Countryside Sites
    A Vision for Guildford Borough’s Countryside Sites 2017 – 2027 RES, ver 1.0, 050617 A vision for Guildford Borough’s countryside sites 2017 - 2027 A vision for Guildford Borough’s countryside sites 2017 - 2027 1 Contents Foreword 1 Contents & Foreword Foreword by Richard Billington, Lead Councillor for Rural Economy, Countryside, Parks and Leisure. 2 Background (Where we are) I am delighted to introduce Guildford Borough Council’s first Vision for Guildford Borough’s Countryside Sites. 3-4 Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services The Countryside around Guildford has developed as a working landscape, 5 Where do we want to be: which has shaped the present landscape and associated wildlife habitats. Our Objectives The constant change of use of the countryside provides opportunities 6 Purpose of this document as well as challenges to deliver land management that ensures the countryside we enjoy today will continue to be enjoyed by future 7 Vision statement generations. 8-10 Policies and Legislation Accessible countryside and contact with nature contributes to people’s 11-12 Issues (opportunities quality of life, and is an important experience in our children’s and challenges) development to becoming adults. The importance of the countryside to 13 Habitat Policies: our resident’s health and wellbeing cannot be overstated. A. Heathland Residents and visitors alike value the countryside, and this is reflected in 14-15 Habitat Policies: the number of partner organisations who commit thousands of hours in B. Wey Valley Meadows volunteer time to its upkeep. 16 Habitat Policies: We own and manage over 50 countryside sites that cover an area of C.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin/Issue418 26/11/09 09:46 Page 1
    86476_SAS/Bulletin/Issue418 26/11/09 09:46 Page 1 Registered Charity No: 272098 ISSN 0585-9980 SURREY ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY CASTLE ARCH, GUILDFORD GU1 3SX Tel/ Fax: 01483 532454 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.surreyarchaeology.org.uk Bulletin 418 December 2009 MERRY AXEMAS (sorry! ) 86476_SAS/Bulletin/Issue418 26/11/09 09:46 Page 2 Frontispiece: Palaeolith from the Farnham gravel terraces. Photo by Alan Hall to whom I owe an apology for omitting the scale (it wouldn’t fit the page). (see p17) ASHTEAD ROMAN VILLA AND TILEWORKS David Bird The fourth main season of excavation on Ashtead Common was undertaken by the Society’s Roman Studies Group between 26th August and 14th September. The weather was very kind and a larger digging team could be accommodated than previously because work took place in well-separated areas (numbers are restricted by nature conservation requirements). As a result, it was possible to achieve all the objectives for the year and indeed exceed them. The enclosure wall for the villa was found to extend at least as far west as just to the north of the bath-house attached to the villa; the phasing of the villa is now much better understood; a rough tile-paved area was found that may prove to be part of a tileworks structure; and the remnants of a tile kiln were found. As before, trench supervisors were David Calow, Nikki Cowlard and Frank Pemberton; Alan Hall controlled site recording and Margaret Broomfield was finds supervisor. Many other team regulars play a crucial part.
    [Show full text]
  • ENVIRONMENTAL CAPACITY ANALYSIS: Guildford (North) - Land Parcel A1: Land Near Stoke Hill and Stringer’S Common
    ENVIRONMENTAL CAPACITY ANALYSIS: Guildford (North) - Land Parcel A1: Land near Stoke Hill and Stringer’s Common The land parcel exhibits a gentle slope with a north easterly aspect. The land rises from a high point of 45 metres AOD close to the urban edge of Guildford, to the lowest point in TOPOGRAPHY the north east corner of the land parcel at approximately 35 metres AOD. The land parcel is perceived as being generally level with gentle undulations. The land parcel is predominately managed as woodland, with smaller areas of arable LAND USES and pastoral farmland. The land parcel is generally contained by substantial woodland treecover. Open ground LANDSCAPE includes a rectangular area of pastoral and arable farmland. The woodland treecover CHARACTER generally creates a moderate sense of enclosure and frames the land parcel in physical and visual terms. G1 – Worplesdon Wooded and Settled Heath (GRUFA) – Distinct landscape to the north-west of Guildford comprising a mosaic of heath and wooded common land, interspersed with areas of pasture and horse grazing, historic settlement (Worplesdon) LANDSCAPE and the residential suburb at Jacobs Well. The commons, especially Stringer’s Common, CHARACTER are important in defining the urban edge and preventing coalescence. AREAS H2 – Slyfield Gravel Terrace (GRUFA) – the landscape of the gravel terrace has an important role in creating a clear ‘gap’ and sense of separation between the town and the outlying settlement at Jacobs Well, with the agricultural land providing a strong rural context for the residential areas. LANDSCAPE The area is not subject to any statutory or non-statutory landscape designations.
    [Show full text]
  • Merrow History
    Memories of Merrow Contents Introduction 4 The History of Merrow Matters 7 Merrow Childhood 8 School 10 Shops 12 Work 16 Farming 18 Everyday Life 20 Church 22 Care for Guildford 25 Forgotten landmarks 26 Merrow House 30 Uplands 32 Merrow Grows… 34 Merrow Village Hall 36 Special occasions 37 The War 38 The Downs 42 Merrow’s Ancient Yew Trees 44 Transport 46 The Miss Johnsons 46 Health 47 Entertainment 48 Merrow Dramatic Society 49 Introduction There have been several histories of Merrow, which trace the development of the village from early times to the present day. This book, however, looks at Merrow through the eyes of its present-day residents. Many of the articles here were originally published in Merrow Matters during 1998 and 1999, although some are published here for the first time. We have arranged by topic to show the differences and similarities between them. The articles we have included are as follows: Memories of Merrow, by Elise Ireland (first published in Merrow Matters No 2, Summer 1998) “There is always an exclamation of surprise when I admit to newcomers to Merrow that I have never moved further than half a mile from the house in Epsom Road in which I was born, and that I was christened and married in Merrow Church. But, believe me, there are quite a few of us 1 around! I can think of many people with family roots in Merrow who have never moved – unless there is a good reason, who would wish to move from such a pleasant area? It is so near to Guildford and its theatre and entertainment; and there is the close proximity of London, the airports, and the South Coast, not to mention the glorious countryside around us, the Surrey villages, and the view from Newlands Corner to the South Downs.
    [Show full text]
  • CPRE Surrey 'Surrey Voice' Newsletter.Indd
    ISSN 2515-5105 Magazine of the Surrey Campaign to Protect Rural England | Summer 2021 BACK TO NATURE Follow us on Twitter @CPRESurrey Visit our website www.cpresurrey.org.uk Email: [email protected] Go-ahead for Surrey Hills AONB review Protecting Guildford’s countryside for the future Natural England, the government agency responsible one of England’s most beautiful landscapes, as we By Alivia Kratke View of Pewley Down Fields (credit Alistair Williams) for the natural environment, announced on 24 June that build back greener from the pandemic.” There have been four generations of Guildfordians since the Surrey Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Once-in-a-lifetime opportunity Pewley Hill was spared from development and gifted to the (AONB) will be considered for boundary expansion. community a hundred years ago. Yet, this year, residents of Welcoming the announcement, Heather Kerswell, Chair This is an important announcement and follows the town were called upon, once again, to rally round and of the Surrey Hills AONB Board commented: “We are years of campaigning by CPRE Surrey to secure the protect this special area for the generations to follow. extension of the AONB to take in more of Surrey’s most delighted that work is starting on a proposed extension Pewley Down Fields, farmland adjacent to the Pewley Hill beautiful countryside, allowing it to benefi t from greater to this nationally important landscape. I fi nd it diffi cult to nature reserve, and in the Surrey Hills Area of Outstanding protection and to be safeguarded for future generations. understand why the existing boundary was drawn so incredibly tightly and excluded many beautiful natural Natural Beauty, contains diverse and abundant fl ora and The Surrey Hills AONB stretches across a quarter of landscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Guildford Landscape Character Assessment & Guidance
    January 2007 Guildford Landscape Character Assessment & Guidance Final Report Volume 2: Rural-Urban Fringe Assessment Prepared by Guildford Borough Council and Land Use Consultants GUILDFORD LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT RURAL-URBAN FRINGE ASSESSMENT FINAL REPORT Prepared by Guildford Borough Council and Land Use Consultants January 2007 43 Chalton Street London NW1 1JD Tel: 020 7383 5784 Fax: 020 7383 4798 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION AND CLASSIFICATION HIERARCHY .......... 1 2. METHOD STATEMENT .................................................................... 5 3. THE LANDSCAPE SETTING OF GUILDFORD AND ASH AND TONGHAM........................................................................................ 11 4. GUILDFORD RURAL-URBAN FRINGE CLASSIFICATION...... 19 Character Area A1: Lower Wey Rural-Urban Fringe ....................... 21 Character Area A2: Upper Wey Rural-Urban Fringe ....................... 27 Character Area B1: Hog’s Back Rural-Urban Fringe ........................ 35 Character Area B2: Pewley-Albury Downs Rural-Urban Fringe...... 41 Character Area C1: Merrow Downs Rural-Urban Fringe ................. 47 Character Area D1: Clandon Rural-Urban Fringe............................. 53 Character Area E1: Rydeshill - Fairlands Rural-Urban Fringe.......... 57 Character Area E2: Clandon Rural-Urban Fringe.............................. 65 Character Area G1: Worplesdon Rural-Urban Fringe...................... 71 Character Area H2: Slyfield Rural-Urban Fringe............................... 75 Character Area H3: Artington Rural-Urban
    [Show full text]
  • Statutory Designated Sites in Surrey
    STATUTORY DESIGNATED SITES IN SURREY Statutory Designated Site Borough(s) Special Protection Areas (SPA) South West London Waterbodies SPA Elmbridge, Runnymede, Spelthorne Thames Basin Heaths SPA Elmbridge, Guildford, Surrey Heath, Waverley, Woking Thursley, Hankley & Frensham Commons SPA Waverley Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA Waverley Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Site) South West London Waterbodies Ramsar Site Elmbridge, Runnymede, Spelthorne Thursley & Ockley Bogs Ramsar Site Waverley Special Area of Conservation (SAC) Mole Gap to Reigate Escarpment SAC Mole Valley, Reigate & Banstead Thursley, Ash, Pirbright & Chobham SAC Guildford, Surrey Heath, Waverley, Woking Windsor Forest & Great Park SAC Runnymede Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) Ash to Brookwood Heaths SSSI Guildford, Surrey Heath, Woking Auclaye SSSI Mole Valley Banstead Downs SSSI Reigate & Banstead Basingstoke Canal SSSI Guildford, Surrey Heath, Woking Blackheath SSSI Guildford, Waverley Blindley Heath SSSI Tandridge Bookham Commons SSSI Mole Valley Bourley & Long Valley SSSI Waverley Broadmoor to Bagshot Woods & Heaths SSSI Surrey Heath Brook Brick Pit SSSI Waverley Charleshill SSSI Waverley Charterhouse to Eashing SSSI Guildford, Waverley Chiddingfold Forest SSSI Waverley Chipstead Downs SSSI Reigate & Banstead Chobham Common SSSI Surrey Heath Clock House Brickworks SSSI Mole Valley Colony Bog & Bagshot Heath SSSI Guildford, Surrey Heath, Woking Colyers Hanger SSSI Guildford Combe Bottom SSSI Guildford Devil's Punch Bowl SSSI Waverley Dumsey Meadow
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Land Ownership Change in United Kingdom
    Forest Land Ownership Change in United Kingdom COST Action FP1201 FACESMAP Country Report COST Action FP1201 Forest Land Ownership Change in Europe: Significance for Management and Policy (FACESMAP) Forest Land Ownership Change in United Kingdom COST Action FP1201 FACESMAP Country Report Authors Jenny Wong Wild Resources Ltd Ynys Uchaf, Mynydd Llandygai, Bangor Gwynedd LL57 4BZ United Kingdom Anna Lawrence Forest Research, Northern Research Station Roslin, EH25 9SY United Kingdom Julie Urquhart Imperial College London Centre for Environmental Policy South Kensington Campus London SW7 2AZ United Kingdom Diana Feliciano University of Aberdee School of Biological Sciences Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences 23 St Machar Drive, Aberdeen AB24 3UU United Kingdom Bill Slee The James Hutton Institute Social Economic and Geographical Sciences Research Group Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH United Kingdom The COST Action FP1201 FACESMAP Country Reports are edited by the European Forest Institute Central-East and South-East European Regional Office (EFICEEC-EFISEE) at the University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU). The Country Reports are not subject to external peer review. The responsibility for the contents of the Country Reports lies solely with the country author teams. Comments and critique by readers are highly appreciated. The main parts of these Country Reports will be included in the upcoming EFICEEC-EFISEE Research Report “Forest Land Ownership Change in Europe. COST Action FP1201 FACESMAP Country Reports, Joint Volume”, published online on the FACESMAP (http://facesmap.boku.ac.at) and EFICEEC-EFISEE (www.eficeec.efi.int) websites. Reference: Wong, J., Lawrence, A., Urquhart, J., Feliciano, D., Slee, B. (2015) Forest Land Ownership Change in United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Design and Access Statement
    Linden Homes (Guildford) Ltd Submission for 2014 Urban Design Group Awards – Developer Award (Residential) Scheme: Boxgrove Gardens 2. Design and Access Statement Epsom Road Guildford former DEFRA site design & access statement OCTOBER 2008 4 EPSOM ROad, GUILdfOrd FORMer Defra SITE - DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT We are not in the business of wasting paper! JOHN THOMPSON & PARTNERS is a member of the First Mile Mixed recycling scheme. We operate a full recycling programme in our practice and make every effort to contribute to a Greener Way of Living & Working. The paper in this document is produced using ECF (Elementary Chlorine Free) pulp that is 100% degradable and manufactured to ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and EMAS (EU’s Eco Management and Audit Scheme) standards. All the wood used in the manufacture of this paper is sourced from suppliers employing sustainable forestry plans. We saved 242 trees between August 2007 and August 2008. First Mile Recycling Ltd. 175 Piccadilly, London W1J 9TB Freephone: 0800 612 9894 • Fax: (020) 7499 7517 • Web: www.thefirstmile.co.uk JOHN THOMPSON & PARTNERS electricity is supplied by Good Energy, the only UK’s only 100% renewable electricity supplier. All the electricity that Good Energy supplies comes from wind, small scale hydro and solar power generators from all over Britain. JOHN THOMPSON & PARTNERS are supporters in kind of The Academy of Urbanism which brings together a group of thinkers and practitioners involved in the social, cultural, economic, political and physical development of our villages, towns and cities. JOHN THOMPSON & PARTNERS is a member of The Green Register, a training and networking organisation that brings together all disciplines in the construction industry who have a demonstrable commitment to sustainable building practices.
    [Show full text]