Walney Wind Farm Track Record 2016
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Definitive Who's Who of the Wind Energy Industry
2014 Top 100 Power People 1 100 TOP 100 POWER PEOPLE 2014 The definitive who’s who of the wind energy industry © A Word About Wind, 2014 2014 Top 100 Power People Contents 2 CONTENTS Editorial: Introducing the Top 100 Power People 3 Compiling the top 100: Advisory panel and methodology 4 Profiles: Numbers 100 to 11 6 Q&A: Rory O’Connor, Managing Director, BlackRock 15 Q&A: David Jones, Managing Director, Allianz Capital Partners 19 Q&A: Torben Möger Pedersen, CEO, PensionDanmark 23 Top ten profiles:The most influential people in global wind 25 Top 100 list: The full Top 100 Power People for 2014 28 Next year: Key dates for A Word About Wind in 2015 30 Networking at A Word About Wind Quarterly Drinks © A Word About Wind, 2014 2014 Top 100 Power People Editorial 3 EDITORIAL elcome to our third annual Top from the six last year, but shows there W100 Power People report. is still plenty that wind can do to attract and retain women in senior roles. When we took on the challenge back in 2012 of identifying and assessing the Wind likes to think of itself as a pro- key people working in wind, it was a gressive industry, and in many ways it timely task. The industry was starting to is. But let’s not be blind to the ways in move out of established pockets in Eu- which it continues to operate like many rope, North America and Asia, and into other sectors, with males continuing to by Richard Heap, emerging markets around the world. -
Final Annual Load Factors for 2018/19 Tnuos Tariffs
Final Annual Load Factors for 2018/19 TNUoS Tariffs October 2017 NGET: Final ALFs for 2018/19 TNUoS Tariffs October 2017 1 Final Annual Load Factors for 2018/19 TNUoS Tariffs This information paper contains the Final Annual Load Factors (ALFs) that National Grid will use in the calculation of Generation TNUoS charges from April 2018. October 2017 October 2017 Contents Executive Summary 4 Annual Load Factors For The 2018/19 Charging Year 5 Table 1: Annual Load Factors By Generating Station 5 Table 2: Generic Annual Load Factors For The 2018/19 Charging Year 10 Changes to the Draft ALFs 11 The Onshore Wind Generic ALF has changed 11 Edinbane 11 Pen Y Cymoedd 11 Inactive Generators 12 How Are ALFs Calculated? 13 Five Years Of Data 13 Four Years Of Data 14 Three Years Of Data 14 Fewer Than Three Years Of Data 14 Calculation Of Partial Year ALFs 15 Generic ALFs 15 Next Steps 15 Appendix A: Generation Charging Principles 16 CMP268 16 The TNUoS Wider Tariff 16 Other Charges 17 Contact Us If you have any comments or questions on the contents or format of this report, please don’t hesitate to get in touch with us. Team Email & Phone [email protected] 01926 654633 NGET: Final ALFs for 2018/19 TNUoS Tariffs October 2017 3 Executive Summary This document contains the Final Annual Load Factors (ALFs) to be used in the calculation of generator Transmission Network Use of System (TNUoS) tariffs for 2018/19, effective from 1 April 2018. The ALFs are based on generation data for five years from 2012/13 until 2016/17. -
Repower Systems AG Corporate Presentation
REpower Systems AG Corporate Presentation September 2009 “Of all the forces of nature, I should think the wind contains the largest amount of motive power – that is, power to move things.” …… Abraham Lincoln (1859) “We will harness the sun and the winds and the soil to fuel our cars and run our factories […] All this we can do. And all this we will do.” …… Barack Obama (2009) 2 There are four good reasons for the growth of renewable energies. Scarce resources Import dependency RENEWABLERENEWABLE Climatic change ENERGIESENERGIES Growing energy demand 3 Agenda At a glance Market Company Technology Projects Financials & Outlook 4 Fiscal year 2008/09 at a glance. ExpansionExpansion InnovationsInnovations OffshoreOffshore milestonesmilestones ofof capacitiescapacities StartStart ofof 5M5M serialserial ProductProduct launchlaunch ofof upgradedupgraded ConstructionConstruction startstart ofof newnew productionproduction inin thethe newnew offshoreoffshore turbineturbine REpowerREpower R&DR&D CentreCentre offshoreoffshore manufacturingmanufacturing andand 6M6M (Osterrönfeld, Germany) (Osterrönfeld, Germany) logisticslogistics centrecentre ProductProduct launchlaunch ofof newnew StartStart ofof rotorrotor bladeblade CompletionCompletion ofof firstfirst fullyfully onshoreonshore turbineturbine REpowerREpower productionproduction inin thethe newnew rotorrotor approvedapproved BelgiumBelgium offshoreoffshore 3.XM3.XM bladeblade facilityfacility windwind farmfarm „Thornton„Thornton Bank“Bank“ StartStart ofof serialserial productionproduction ofof FrameworkFramework -
Offshore Wind in Europe Key Trends and Statistics 2020
Offshore Wind in Europe Key trends and statistics 2020 Offshore Wind in Europe Key trends and statistics 2020 Published in February 2021 windeurope.org This report summarises construction and financing activity in European offshore wind farms from 1 January to 31 December 2020. WindEurope regularly surveys the industry to determine the level of installations of foundations and turbines, and the subsequent dispatch of first power to the grid. The data includes demonstration sites and factors in decommissioning where it has occurred. Annual installations are expressed in gross figures while cumulative capacity represents net installations per site and country. Rounding of figures is at the discretion of the author. DISCLAIMER This publication contains information collected on a regular basis throughout the year and then verified with relevant members of the industry ahead of publication. Neither WindEurope nor its members, nor their related entities are, by means of this publication, rendering professional advice or services. Neither WindEurope nor its members shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies on this publication. TEXT AND ANALYSIS: Lizet Ramírez, WindEurope Daniel Fraile, WindEurope Guy Brindley, WindEurope EDITOR: Rory O’Sullivan, WindEurope DESIGN: Laia Miró, WindEurope Lin Van de Velde, Drukvorm FINANCE DATA: Clean Energy Pipeline and IJ Global All currency conversions made at EUR/ GBP 0.8897 and EUR/USD 1.1422. Figures include estimates for undisclosed values. PHOTO COVER: Kriegers Flak -
Advantages of Wind Power
Moravian Women’s Association Home and Overseas Paper – April 2013 Wind power Blow me down The North wind blew on Monday As the East wind got the flu The West wind blew on Tuesday As the South wind never knew The North East wind had Wednesday As the South West wasn’t chuffed The North West blew on Thursday As the South East hardly puffed The East and West blew Friday As the others had a rest The North and South blew Saturday As the weekends were the best The lot of them had Sunday As the winds turned into storm The whole of them had Monday off As the week got back to norm © 2008 David Threadgold Rambling Riddles & Rhymes This poem seems to capture how we have been at the mercy of what seems like one of the worst winters for cold, wet, windy weather we have had for a long time. In the UK we now have wind farms, both on land, and offshore. While those on land are most obvious and cause most controversy, the offshore Walney Wind Farm produces 367 megawatts and the Thanet Offshore Wind Project 300 megawatts. The London Array in the Thames estuary (630 megawatts) which opened in March 2013, is the largest wind farm in the world, and when complete, it will cover 90 square miles. Its 175 turbines will be capable of generating enough energy to power nearly half a million homes – two thirds of the homes in Kent, and reduce CO2 emissions by over 900,000 tonnes a year. -
Walney Extension Scoping Report
Walney Extension offshore wind farm – EIA Scoping Report September 2010 Walney Extension offshore wind farm rights, 2010. All rights reserved. For other chart data copyright see Appendix C. Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report Co-ordinated by: Ferdinando Giammichele and Trine Hoffman Sørensen. Prepared by: Ferdinando Giammichele, Stuart Livesey, Nicola Barberis-Negra, Trine Hoffman Sørensen, Jennifer Brack, Joanne Myers, Thomas Walsh, Emily Marshall, Aja Brodal, and Shiu-Yeung Hui. Checked by: Ferdinando Giammichele, Trine Hoffman Sørensen, Jesper Krarup Holst, and Hans Lyhne Borg. Approved by: Jesper Krarup Holst. DONG Energy Power (UK) Ltd. 33 Grosvenor Place, Belgravia, London, SW1X 7HY Additional contributions and review by: Project Management Support Services Ltd., Brown & May Marine Ltd. and Bond Pearce LLP. Version: Final. Date: September 27th 2010. Submitted to the Infrastructure Planning Commission (IPC) on September 27th 2010. © DONG Energy Power (UK) Ltd, 2010. All rights reserved. This report is also downloadable from the Walney offshore wind farm website at: www.walneyextension.co.uk or a paper copy can be requested by writing to: [email protected] . Pictures: © Walney (UK) Offshore Windfarms Ltd., 2010. Front cover picture: Horns Rev 2 offshore wind farm off the western Danish coast at Esbjerg, September 2009 © DONG Energy Power (UK) Ltd., 2010. Charts: © DONG Energy Power (UK) Ltd., 2010. United Kingdom Hydrographic Office admiralty charts: © SeaZone Solutions Ltd. Licence no. 092008.004 to DONG Energy Power (UK) Ltd. United Kingdom coastline and background raster tiles (1:250,000 and 1:10,000) contain OS OpenData: Ordnance Survey © Crown Copyright and database DONG Energy Page 2 of 151 Walney Extension offshore wind farm – EIA Scoping Report September 2010 Table of Contents Summary ............................................................................................................................................... -
4. Codes and Section 106 Agreements
NIPA Insights II Programme Research Project Preparing a Flexibility Toolkit Project B Mechanisms to support flexibility: Requirements and codes Professor Janice Morphet and Dr Ben Clifford May 2019 Mechanisms to support flexibility (Requirements and codes): Summary report Contents Introduction 2 Scope for flexibility in NSIPs 4 Requirements 7 Codes and Section 106 agreements 11 Case studies 15 Suggestions for the toolkit 24 Appendices 31 Acknowledgements 37 About the authors 37 1. Mechanisms to support flexibility (Requirements and codes): Summary report 1. Introduction When the 2008 Planning Act was introduced, it was intended to create a system that guaranteed decision making about national infrastructure projects within a specified time and a process where consent for the project is granted through a Statutory Instrument, usually with some form of detailed design then following consent. The approach to flexibility and light touch on detail was enshrined in the philosophy of the Act, given that previous experience of obtaining planning consent for major infrastructure projects had frequently been lengthy. This meant that there was a focus on obtaining the Development Consent Order (DCO) for the project, leaving the flexibility required for later delivery to follow at a later stage. Since 2008, the definition of NSIPs and the requirement to assess their environmental consequences have allowed for some flexibility in the delineation of their site boundary, using the Rochdale Envelope However, in practice, some more detailed aspects of a project have been required to be included within the DCO. This included the requirements over use of land and associated Compulsory Acquisition powers. As NSIPs moved from consent to construction, the assumed flexibility in the system was found to be limited in some cases, requiring changes to the DCO. -
English Translation of Law Comment 1991 Stromeinspeise-Gesetzes (Steg) Electricity Feed Act Tariff Set at 90% of Consumer Prices
The World Bank Asia Sustainable and Public Disclosure Authorized Alternative Energy Program Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized China Meeting the Challenges of Offshore and Large-Scale Wind Power: Regulatory Review of Offshore Wind in Five European Countries Public Disclosure Authorized China: Meeting the Challenges of Offshore and Large-Scale Wind Power Joint publication of the National Energy Administration of China and the World Bank Supported by the Australian Agency for International Development and ASTAE Copyright © 2010 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank Group 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433, USA All rights reserved First printing: May 2010 Manufactured in the United States of America. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Australian Agency for International Development. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this report are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, or its affiliated organizations, or to members of its board of executive directors or the countries they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any consequence of their use. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this volume do not imply on the part of the World Bank Group any judgment on the legal status of any territory or the -
Appraisal of Sustainability Site Report for Kirksanton
Appraisal of Sustainability Site Report for Kirksanton EN-6: Revised Draft National Policy Statement for Nuclear Power Generation Planning for new energy infrastructure October 2010 Preface: Appraisal of Sustainability of the revised draft Nuclear National Policy Statement The Appraisal of Sustainability (AoS), incorporating Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA), of the revised draft Nuclear National Policy Statement (Nuclear NPS) has been undertaken at a strategic level. It considers the effects of the proposed policy at a national level and the sites to be assessed for their suitability for the deployment of new nuclear power stations by 2025. These strategic appraisals are part of an ongoing assessment process that started in March 2008 and, following completion of this AoS, will continue with project level assessments when developers make applications for development consent in relation to specific projects. Applications for development consents to the Infrastructure Planning Commission (IPC) will need to be accompanied by an Environmental Statement having been the subject of a detailed Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). The AoS/SEA Reports are presented in the following documents: AoS Non-Technical Summary Main AoS Report of revised draft Nuclear NPS Introduction Approach and Methods Alternatives Radioactive Waste Findings Summary of Sites Technical Appendices Annexes to Main AoS Report: Reports on Sites Site AoS Reports Technical Appendices All documents are available on the website of the Department of Energy and Climate Change at http://www.energynpsconsultation.decc.gov.uk This document is the Appraisal of Sustainability Site Report for Kirksanton. This report has been prepared by the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) with expert input from a team of specialist planning and environmental consultancies led by MWH UK Ltd with Enfusion Ltd, Nicholas Pearson Associates Ltd, Studsvik UK Ltd and Metoc plc. -
2014JRC Wind Status Report
2014 JRC wind status report Technology, market and economic aspects of wind energy in Europe Roberto LACAL ARÁNTEGUI Javier SERRANO GONZÁLEZ 2015 Report EUR 27254 EN Cover picture: Looking up. © Jos Beurskens. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Energy and Transport Contact information Roberto LACAL ARÁNTEGUI Address: Joint Research Centre, Institute for Energy and Transport, Westerduinweg 3, 1755 LE Petten, the Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] Tel. +31 224565-390 Fax +31 224565-616 JRC Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc Legal Notice This publication is a Science and Policy Report by the Joint Research Centre, the European Commission’s in-house science service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication. All images © European Union 2015, except where indicated JRC96184 EUR 27254 EN ISBN 978-92-79-48380-6 (PDF) ISBN 978-92-79-48381-3 (print) ISSN 1831-9424 (online) ISSN 1018-5593 (print) doi:10.2790/676580 (online) Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2015 © European Union, 2015 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Abstract This report presents key technology, market and economic aspects of wind energy in Europe and beyond. During 2014 the wind energy sector saw a new record in actual installations in a context of healthy manufacturer balance sheet and downward trend in prices. -
Transmission Networks Connections Update
Transmission Networks Connections Update May 2015 SHE-T–TO SPT–TO NG–TO/SO SHE-T–TO SPT–TO NG–TO/SO Back to Contents TNCU – May 2015 Page 01 Contents Foreword ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 02 1. Introduction /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 03 2. Connection timescales ///////////////////////////////////////////// 04 Illustrative connection timescales /////////////////////////////////////// 04 Connections by area /////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 05 3. GB projects by year ///////////////////////////////////////////////// 06 Contracted overall position /////////////////////////////////////////////// 08 Renewable projects status by year ///////////////////////////////////// 10 Non-Renewable projects status by year – Excluding Nuclear /// 11 Non-Renewable projects status by year – Nuclear only ////////// 12 Interconnector projects status by year //////////////////////////////// 13 4. Additional data by transmission owner ///////////////////////// 14 National Grid Electricity Transmission plc //////////////////////////// 16 Scottish Hydro Electricity Transmission plc ////////////////////////// 18 Scottish Power Transmission Limited ///////////////////////////////// 20 5. Connection locations /////////////////////////////////////////////// 22 Northern Scotland projects map //////////////////////////////////////// 25 Southern Scotland projects map /////////////////////////////////////// 28 Northern England projects map ///////////////////////////////////////// -
Offshore Wind Market and Economic Analysis
Offshore Wind Market and Economic Analysis Annual Market Assessment Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Client Contact Michael Hahn, Patrick Gilman Award Number DE-EE0005360 Navigant Consulting, Inc. 77 Bedford Street Suite 400 Burlington, MA 01803-5154 781.270.8314 www.navigant.com February 22, 2013 U.S. Offshore Wind Market and Economic Analysis Annual Market Assessment Document Number DE-EE0005360 Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Michael Hahn Patrick Gilman Prepared by: Navigant Consulting, Inc. Lisa Frantzis, Principal Investigator Lindsay Battenberg Mark Bielecki Charlie Bloch Terese Decker Bruce Hamilton Aris Karcanias Birger Madsen Jay Paidipati Andy Wickless Feng Zhao Navigant Consortium Member Organizations Key Contributors American Wind Energy Association Jeff Anthony and Chris Long Great Lakes Wind Collaborative John Hummer and Victoria Pebbles Green Giraffe Energy Bankers Marie DeGraaf, Jérôme Guillet, and Niels Jongste National Renewable Energy Laboratory Eric Lantz Ocean & Coastal Consultants (a COWI company) Brent D. Cooper, P.E., Joe Marrone, P.E., and Stanley M. White, P.E., D.PE, D.CE Tetra Tech EC, Inc. Michael D. Ernst, Esq. Offshore Wind Market and Economic Analysis Page ii Document Number DE-EE0005360 Notice and Disclaimer This report was prepared by Navigant Consulting, Inc. for the exclusive use of the U.S. Department of Energy – who supported this effort under Award Number DE-EE0005360. The work presented in this report represents our best efforts and judgments based on the information available at the time this report was prepared. Navigant Consulting, Inc. is not responsible for the reader’s use of, or reliance upon, the report, nor any decisions based on the report.