Original Article Increased Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase Expression in the Hippocampus Impairs Learning and Memory in Fmr1 Knockout Mice

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Original Article Increased Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase Expression in the Hippocampus Impairs Learning and Memory in Fmr1 Knockout Mice Int J Clin Exp Med 2018;11(4):3121-3134 www.ijcem.com /ISSN:1940-5901/IJCEM0069451 Original Article Increased glutamic acid decarboxylase expression in the hippocampus impairs learning and memory in Fmr1 knockout mice Li-Jun Dai1, Yue-Ling Huang1, Wei-Wen Sun2, Bing-Fei Ye1, Sheng-Qiang Chen2 1The Laboratory Animal Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510182, China; 2Institute of Neurosci- ence, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510260, China Received March 15, 2016; Accepted February 14, 2018; Epub April 15, 2018; Published April 30, 2018 Abstract: This study compares the behavioral differences in 4- and 6-week-old mice in hippocampal expression of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD). Using immunoblotting and immunohistochemical staining, we compared the changed GAD expression in Fmr1 knockout mice. We detected the amino acid levels of hippocampus by high performance liquid chromatography, the data were analyzed with Multifactor Variance Analysis. Fmr1 knock out (KO) mice showed a higher expression of GAD65/67 protein in hippocampus than the Fmr1 wild type (WT) mice (P < 0.05). The six-week KO mice and WT mice exhibited a higher expression of GAD65/67 protein (in hippocampus) than their four-week counterpart (P < 0.05). KO mice showed a higher number of GAD65/67-positive neurons in hippocampus and cortex than the WT mice of the same week (P < 0.05). The six-week KO mice and WT mice contain a greater number of GAD65/GAD67-positive neurons in hippocampus than their four-week counterpart (P < 0.05). The γ-aminobutyric acid and aspartate levels in KO group were lower than WT mice, while the level of glutamate in KO was higher than WT group. Altered GAD protein levels in KO mice may play an important role in their abnormal learning and memory behavior in Fmr1 knockout mice. Keywords: Passive avoidance test, Fmr1 knockout mice, behaviour, GAD, hippocampus Introduction inhibitory imbalances and synaptic dysfunction are proposed to play a central role in a number Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is a common heredi- of pathological states, including FXS and auti- tary disease associated with mental retarda- sm spectrum disorder (ASD). FXS has varying tion. The CCG repetitive sequence amplification degrees of cognitive ability, ranging from nor- and silencing of the secondary promoter region mal to severely impaire [11-13]. FXS has a male of the methylated FMR1 (fragile x gene) cause bias, but also affects women with severe cogni- deficiency in FMR1 (fragile X mental retardation tive impairment [14, 15]. Comorbidity of autism 1) protein leading to mental retardation, behav- and FXS has been established [16, 17]. Its ioral anomalies and macro-orchidism [1-8]. The characteristics include disruptions in cognition, genetic basis of FXS involves a CGG repeat social skills, sensitivity to stimuli and circadian expansion mutation in the Fmr1 gene, which rhythms [17-22]. These conditions are modeled codes for fragile X mental retardation protein in Fmr1 knockout mice that display several (FMRP), an RNA-binding protein involved in the phenotypes of FXS, Thus, Fmr1 knockout mice trans-port and translational regulation of a provide an important animal model to study wide array of cellular and synaptic proteins. characteristics of FXS. Fmr1 KO mice, originally Fragile X syndrome (FXS) affects 1 in 4000- created by the Dutch-Belgian Consortium are 6000 people worldwide [9, 10], FXS patients frequently used as models of FXS. Fmr1 (fragile are characterized by anxiety, sensory hypersen- X mental retardation 1) knockout mouse lacks sitivity, and elevated incidence of epilepsy, con- normal FMR1 protein, manifests abnormal sistent with dysfunction and imbalance in excit- behavior, mental retardation, memory impair- atory and inhibitory neurotransmission in the ment and macro-orchidism [1-8], and is linked amygdala, cortex, and hippocampus. Excitatory- to autism at the molecular level [23-25]. The GAD and avoidance behaviour of Fmr1 KO mice CGG expansion size is correlated with spatial Neuroscience, Second Affiliated Hospital of performance in FXS males [26]. In addition, Guangzhou Medical College, China, from Janu- Fragile X Mental Retardation 1 (FMR1) expres- ary to December 2010. Animals were bred and sion is high in the hippocampus [27]. Hippo- reproduced by Guangzhou Medical College campus has been shown to be necessary for Laboratory Animal Center. The operation and the formation of spatial memory in humans and breeding procedures of animals in this study rodents. The “mGluR Theory of Fragile X” [23] conformed to animal breeding management postulates that lack of FMRP leads to defective standards of Guangdong Province and Guang- protein translation downstream of group I zhou Medical College Laboratory, and followed metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), humanitarian principles. Animals were housed leading to enhanced mGluR signaling, which in laboratory for 7 days to adapt to the environ- contributes to impaired learning and memory of ment before experiment, at room temperature FXS. Reducing group I mGluR signaling should (23 ± 2)°C, had access to food and water ad alleviate some of the symptoms of FXS [28]. libitum. Experimental processes were main- Evidence for changes in the GABAergic system tained quiet indoors. Experimental procedures in FXS has also emerged [29-34]. Jorge R [35] were performed in accordance with the Gui- investigated the role of GABA, the major inhibi- dance Suggestions for the Care and Use of tory transmitter of the brain, in the consolida- Laboratory Animals, issued by the Ministry of tion and generalization of conditioned fear and Science and Technology of the People’s in associated network activities in the hippo- Republic of China. campus. These processes are mediated by the experience-dependent regulation of GABA FVB Fmr1 KO mouse and wild counterpart WT synthesis through the glutamic acid decarbox- mouse were kindly provided by Professor BA ylase [36], which account for more than 99% of Oostra from Erasmus University Rotterdam, the GABA synthesis in the brain. Netherland Cell Biology and Genetics Research Center. Select FMR1 KO homozygote (-/-) and The Morris water maze (MWM) is widely used WT homozygote (+/+) FVB inbred line mice, to investigate hippocampus-dependent spatial were grouped according to age (4 or 6 weeks) in learning and memory in rodents. Mouse pas- four groups of 15 each. sive avoiding experiment also is one of the commonly used methods to evaluate memory Genotype identification of experimental ani- and learning ability of central nervous system mals of mouse. Previous studies of Fmr1 KO mice in learning and memory have not consistently Fmr1 gene of KO mice was inserted with neo- reported deficits [37, 38]. In this study, we mycin segment. All the experimental mice were observed 4- and 6-week-old Fmr1 knockout genotyped before use to ensure that the strains mice using passive avoidance and tested were purebred [3]. Design primer 5’-GTGGTTA- changes of Fmr1 knockout mouse hippocam- GCTAAAGTGAGGATGAT-3’ and 5’-CAGGTTTGTT- pus GAD expression. We discussed the rela- GGGATTAACAGATC-3’ in order to detect WT tionship between learning and memory of Fmr1 mice. Design primer 5’-AGTCATGCTATGGATAT- knockout mice and changes in hippocampus CAG-3’ and 5’-TGGGCTCTATGGCTTCTGA-3’ de- GAD expression. We used high performance liq- tect KO mice. We can identify the genotyping of uid chromatography (HPLC) to quantify the hip- experimental animal by polymerase chain reac- pocampal tissue concentrations of aspartate tion (PCR) and electrophoresis Genotype identi- and glutamate, GABA and taurine, discussed fication of experimental animals. the pathogenesis of fragile X syndrome, and discuss the evidence in brain development and Step-through test aging research. BA-200 mice step-through instrument was Materials and methods used to test the step-through behaviors of mice (Thaimeng Science and Technology Company, Laboratory animals Chengdu, Sichuan, China). The mice in the bright chamber headed back toward the door This study, a randomized, controlled animal before training. After adapting to the environ- experiment was performed at the Institute of ment for 3 minutes, power was connected to 3122 Int J Clin Exp Med 2018;11(4):3121-3134 GAD and avoidance behaviour of Fmr1 KO mice copper grid in the black chamber at a voltage Neurotechnologies, Baltimore, MD) [4, 5], fol- 36v. The mouse in the dark chamber received lowing the manufacturer’s guidelines. Briefly, an electric shock. The normal reaction involves freshly removed brains were immersed in a mouse heading back to bright chamber. Copper proprietary impregnated solution and stored grid was switched on for 5 minutes. The mouse at room temperature for 2 weeks in the dark. learning and memory tests were administered Next, the brains were transferred to a second after 24 hours. The first entry of the mouse into impregnation solution and incubated for 48 the dark chamber was defined as step-through hours at 4°C. Finally, the tissues were shipp- latency. The number of mice entering the dark- ed to FD Neurotechnologies, where they were room within 5 minutes was defined as step- sectioned to 120-mm-thick, slices, stained and through error count. If the mice failed to enter mounted on gelatin-coated slides. The slides the darkroom in 5 minutes, latency was record- were returned to UCSF for microscopic ana- ed as 300 seconds. lyses. Step-down test Dendritic spine density and spine morphology A DT-200 mice step-down instrument was used Spine analyses were conducted blinded to to test the step-down behaviors of mice the experimental conditions on coded Golgi (Thaimeng Science and Technology Company, impregnated brain sections containing the dor- Chengdu, Sichuan, China). After setting the sal hippocampus. Spines were examined on period to 5 minutes and voltage 32 V, the mice dendrites of DG granule neurons as well as were placed in each reaction tank platform to apical (stratum radiatum) and basal (stratum test for short memory. After covering the trans- oriens) dendrites of CA1 pyramidal neurons.
Recommended publications
  • Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors
    mGluR Metabotropic glutamate receptors mGluR (metabotropic glutamate receptor) is a type of glutamate receptor that are active through an indirect metabotropic process. They are members of thegroup C family of G-protein-coupled receptors, or GPCRs. Like all glutamate receptors, mGluRs bind with glutamate, an amino acid that functions as an excitatoryneurotransmitter. The mGluRs perform a variety of functions in the central and peripheral nervous systems: mGluRs are involved in learning, memory, anxiety, and the perception of pain. mGluRs are found in pre- and postsynaptic neurons in synapses of the hippocampus, cerebellum, and the cerebral cortex, as well as other parts of the brain and in peripheral tissues. Eight different types of mGluRs, labeled mGluR1 to mGluR8, are divided into groups I, II, and III. Receptor types are grouped based on receptor structure and physiological activity. www.MedChemExpress.com 1 mGluR Agonists, Antagonists, Inhibitors, Modulators & Activators (-)-Camphoric acid (1R,2S)-VU0155041 Cat. No.: HY-122808 Cat. No.: HY-14417A (-)-Camphoric acid is the less active enantiomer (1R,2S)-VU0155041, Cis regioisomer of VU0155041, is of Camphoric acid. Camphoric acid stimulates a partial mGluR4 agonist with an EC50 of 2.35 osteoblast differentiation and induces μM. glutamate receptor expression. Camphoric acid also significantly induced the activation of NF-κB and AP-1. Purity: ≥98.0% Purity: ≥98.0% Clinical Data: No Development Reported Clinical Data: No Development Reported Size: 10 mM × 1 mL, 100 mg Size: 10 mM × 1 mL, 5 mg, 10 mg, 25 mg (2R,4R)-APDC (R)-ADX-47273 Cat. No.: HY-102091 Cat. No.: HY-13058B (2R,4R)-APDC is a selective group II metabotropic (R)-ADX-47273 is a potent mGluR5 positive glutamate receptors (mGluRs) agonist.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft COMP Agenda 16-18 January 2018
    12 January 2018 EMA/COMP/818236/2017 Inspections, Human Medicines Pharmacovigilance and Committees Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP) Draft agenda for the meeting on 16-18 January 2018 Chair: Bruno Sepodes – Vice-Chair: Lesley Greene 16 January 2018, 09:00-19:30, room 2F 17 January 2018, 08:30-19:30, room 2F 18 January 2018, 08:30-18:30, room 2F Health and safety information In accordance with the Agency’s health and safety policy, delegates are to be briefed on health, safety and emergency information and procedures prior to the start of the meeting. Disclaimers Some of the information contained in this agenda is considered commercially confidential or sensitive and therefore not disclosed. With regard to intended therapeutic indications or procedure scopes listed against products, it must be noted that these may not reflect the full wording proposed by applicants and may also vary during the course of the review. Additional details on some of these procedures will be published in the COMP meeting reports once the procedures are finalised. Of note, this agenda is a working document primarily designed for COMP members and the work the Committee undertakes. Note on access to documents Some documents mentioned in the agenda cannot be released at present following a request for access to documents within the framework of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 as they are subject to on- going procedures for which a final decision has not yet been adopted. They will become public when adopted or considered public according to the principles stated in the Agency policy on access to documents (EMA/127362/2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Hierarchical Mechanistic Modelling of Clinical Pharmacokinetic Data
    Hierarchical mechanistic modelling of clinical pharmacokinetic data A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences 2015 Thierry Wendling Manchester Pharmacy School Contents List of Figures ........................................................................................................ 6 List of Tables .......................................................................................................... 9 List of abbreviations ............................................................................................ 10 Abstract ................................................................................................................ 13 Declaration ........................................................................................................... 14 Copyright ............................................................................................................. 14 Acknowledgements .............................................................................................. 15 Chapter 1: General introduction ...................................................................... 16 1.1. Modelling and simulation in drug development ........................................ 17 1.1.1. The drug development process .......................................................... 17 1.1.2. The role of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling in drug development ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Patent Application Publication ( 10 ) Pub . No . : US 2019 / 0192440 A1
    US 20190192440A1 (19 ) United States (12 ) Patent Application Publication ( 10) Pub . No. : US 2019 /0192440 A1 LI (43 ) Pub . Date : Jun . 27 , 2019 ( 54 ) ORAL DRUG DOSAGE FORM COMPRISING Publication Classification DRUG IN THE FORM OF NANOPARTICLES (51 ) Int . CI. A61K 9 / 20 (2006 .01 ) ( 71 ) Applicant: Triastek , Inc. , Nanjing ( CN ) A61K 9 /00 ( 2006 . 01) A61K 31/ 192 ( 2006 .01 ) (72 ) Inventor : Xiaoling LI , Dublin , CA (US ) A61K 9 / 24 ( 2006 .01 ) ( 52 ) U . S . CI. ( 21 ) Appl. No. : 16 /289 ,499 CPC . .. .. A61K 9 /2031 (2013 . 01 ) ; A61K 9 /0065 ( 22 ) Filed : Feb . 28 , 2019 (2013 .01 ) ; A61K 9 / 209 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 9 /2027 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 31/ 192 ( 2013. 01 ) ; Related U . S . Application Data A61K 9 /2072 ( 2013 .01 ) (63 ) Continuation of application No. 16 /028 ,305 , filed on Jul. 5 , 2018 , now Pat . No . 10 , 258 ,575 , which is a (57 ) ABSTRACT continuation of application No . 15 / 173 ,596 , filed on The present disclosure provides a stable solid pharmaceuti Jun . 3 , 2016 . cal dosage form for oral administration . The dosage form (60 ) Provisional application No . 62 /313 ,092 , filed on Mar. includes a substrate that forms at least one compartment and 24 , 2016 , provisional application No . 62 / 296 , 087 , a drug content loaded into the compartment. The dosage filed on Feb . 17 , 2016 , provisional application No . form is so designed that the active pharmaceutical ingredient 62 / 170, 645 , filed on Jun . 3 , 2015 . of the drug content is released in a controlled manner. Patent Application Publication Jun . 27 , 2019 Sheet 1 of 20 US 2019 /0192440 A1 FIG .
    [Show full text]
  • Title Page Metabolism and Disposition of the Metabotropic Glutamate
    DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 17, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.112.050716 DMD FastThis article Forward. has not been Published copyedited onand Juneformatted. 17, The 2013 final versionas doi:10.1124/dmd.112.050716 may differ from this version. DMD#50716 Title Page Metabolism and disposition of the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 antagonist (mGluR5) mavoglurant (AFQ056) in healthy subjects Downloaded from Markus Walles, Thierry Wolf, Yi Jin, Michael Ritzau, Luc Alexis Leuthold, Joel Krauser, dmd.aspetjournals.org Hans-Peter Gschwind, David Carcache, Matthias Kittelmann, Magdalena Ocwieja, Mike Ufer, Ralph Woessner, Abhijit Chakraborty and Piet Swart at ASPET Journals on September 27, 2021 Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel Switzerland (M.W., T.W., Y.J., L.A.L., J. K. H.-P.G, R.W., A.C., P.S.) Analytical Sciences, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland (M.R.) Global Discovery Chemistry, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland (M.K., D.C.) Clinical Science & Innovation Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland (M.O.) Translational Medicine, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland (M.U.) 1 Copyright 2013 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. DMD Fast Forward. Published on June 17, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.112.050716 This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. DMD#50716 Running Title Page Running title:
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Preclinical Pharmacological Targets for Parkinson's Disease
    www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget/ Oncotarget, Vol. 7, No. 20 Emerging preclinical pharmacological targets for Parkinson’s disease Sandeep Vasant More1 and Dong-Kug Choi1 1 Department of Biotechnology, College of Biomedical and Health Science, Konkuk University, Chungju, South Korea Correspondence to: Dong-Kug Choi, email: [email protected] Keywords: dopaminergic, Parkinson’s disease, pharmacological targets, neuroprotection, preclinical Received: October 08, 2015 Accepted: February 08, 2016 Published: March 15, 2016 ABSTRACT Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurological condition caused by the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the basal ganglia. It is the most prevalent form of Parkinsonism, categorized by cardinal features such as bradykinesia, rigidity, tremors, and postural instability. Due to the multicentric pathology of PD involving inflammation, oxidative stress, excitotoxicity, apoptosis, and protein aggregation, it has become difficult to pin-point a single therapeutic target and evaluate its potential application. Currently available drugs for treating PD provide only symptomatic relief and do not decrease or avert disease progression resulting in poor patient satisfaction and compliance. Significant amount of understanding concerning the pathophysiology of PD has offered a range of potential targets for PD. Several emerging targets including AAV-hAADC gene therapy, phosphodiesterase-4, potassium channels, myeloperoxidase, acetylcholinesterase, MAO-B, dopamine, A2A, mGlu5, and 5-HT- 1A/1B receptors are in different stages of clinical development. Additionally, alternative interventions such as deep brain stimulation, thalamotomy, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and gamma knife surgery, are also being developed for patients with advanced PD. As much as these therapeutic targets hold potential to delay the onset and reverse the disease, more targets and alternative interventions need to be examined in different stages of PD.
    [Show full text]
  • Rescue of Fmr1ko Phenotypes with Mglur5 Inhibitors MRZ-8456
    Neurobiology of Disease 119 (2018) 190–198 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Neurobiology of Disease journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ynbdi KO Rescue of Fmr1 phenotypes with mGluR5 inhibitors: MRZ-8456 versus AFQ-056 T Pamela R. Westmarka,b, Andrzej Dekundyc, Andreas Graviusc, Wojciech Danyszc, ⁎ Cara J. Westmarka, a University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Neurology, Madison, WI, USA b University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Medicine, Madison, WI, USA c Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Eckenheimer Landstrasse 100, 60318 Frankfurt am Main, Germany ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) is a drug target for central nervous system disorders such as fragile mGluR5 X syndrome that involve excessive glutamate-induced excitation. We tested the efficacy of a novel negative Fmr1 allosteric modulator of mGluR5 developed by Merz Pharmaceuticals, MRZ-8456, in comparison to MPEP and MRZ-8456 AFQ-056 (Novartis, a.k.a. mavoglurant) in both in vivo and in vitro assays in a mouse model of fragile X syn- AFQ-056 drome, Fmr1KO mice. The in vivo assays included susceptibility to audiogenic-induced seizures and pharmaco- MPEP kinetic measurements of drug availability. The in vitro assays included dose response assessments of biomarker Amyloid-beta precursor protein expression and dendritic spine length and density in cultured primary neurons. Both MRZ-8456 and AFQ-056 attenuated wild running and audiogenic-induced seizures in Fmr1KO mice with similar pharmacokinetic profiles. Both drugs significantly reduced dendritic expression of amyloid-beta protein precursor (APP) and rescued the ratio of mature to immature dendritic spines. These findings demonstrate that MRZ-8456, a drug being devel- oped for the treatment of motor complications of L-DOPA in Parkinson’s disease and which completed a phase I clinical trial, is effective in attenuating both well-established (seizures and dendritic spine maturity) and ex- ploratory biomarker (APP expression) phenotypes in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Exposure-Receptor Occupancy Relationships For
    1521-0103/377/1/157–168$35.00 https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.120.000371 THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS J Pharmacol Exp Ther 377:157–168, April 2021 Copyright ª 2021 by The Author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY Attribution 4.0 International license. Understanding Exposure-Receptor Occupancy Relationships for Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5 Negative Allosteric Modulators across a Range of Preclinical and Clinical Studies Kirstie A. Bennett, Eugenia Sergeev, Cliona P. MacSweeney, Geor Bakker, and Anne E. Cooper Sosei Heptares, Cambridge, CB21 6DG, United Kingdom Received October 9, 2020; accepted January 26, 2021 Downloaded from ABSTRACT The metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGlu5) is a recog- a unified exposure-response relationship was observed when nized central nervous system therapeutic target for which both unbound brain concentration and mGlu5 affinity were several negative allosteric modulator (NAM) drug candidates considered. This relationship showed ,10-fold overall differ- have or are continuing to be investigated for various disease ence, was fitted with a Hill slope that was not significantly indications in clinical development. Direct measurement of different from 1, and appeared consistent with a simple Emax jpet.aspetjournals.org target receptor occupancy (RO) is extremely useful to help model. This is the first time this type of comparison has been design and interpret efficacy and safety in nonclinical and conducted, demonstrating a unified brain exposure-RO re- clinical studies. In the mGlu5 field, this has been success- lationship across several species and mGlu5 NAMs with fully achieved by monitoring displacement of radiolabeled diverse properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Brain Mglu5 Receptor Occupancy Following Single Oral Doses of Mavoglurant As Measured by [11C]-ABP688 PET Imaging in Healthy Volunteers
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2021 Regional brain mGlu5 receptor occupancy following single oral doses of mavoglurant as measured by [11C]-ABP688 PET imaging in healthy volunteers Streffer, Johannes ; Treyer, Valerie ; Buck, Alfred ; Ametamey, Simon M ; Blagoev, Milen ;Maguire, Ralph P ; Gautier, Aurélie ; Auberson, Yves P ; Schmidt, Mark E ; Vranesic, Ivan-Toma ; Gomez-Mancilla, Baltazar ; Gasparini, Fabrizio Abstract: Mavoglurant binds to same allosteric site on metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) as [11C]-ABP688, a radioligand. This open-label, single-center pilot study estimates extent of occupancy of mGluR5 receptors following single oral doses of mavoglurant, using [11C]-ABP688 positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, in six healthy males aged 20–40 years. This study comprised three periods and six subjects were divided into two cohorts. On Day 1 (Period 1), baseline clinical data and safety samples were obtained along with PET scan. During Period 2 (1–7 days after Period 1), cohort 1 and 2 received mavoglurant 25 mg and 100 mg, respectively. During Period 3 (7 days after Period 2), cohort 1 and 2 received mavoglurant 200 mg and 400 mg, respectively. Mavoglurant showed the highest distribution volumes in the cingulate region with lower uptake in cerebellum and white matter, possibly because myelinated axonal sheets maybe devoid of mGlu5 receptors. Maximum concentrations of mavoglurant were observed around 2–3.25 h post-dose. Mavoglurant passed the blood–brain barrier and induced dose- and exposure-dependent displacement of [11C]-ABP688 from the mGluR5 receptors, 3–4 h post-administration (27%, 59%, 74%, 85% receptor occupancy for mavoglurant 25 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, 400 mg dose, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Metabolism Letters, 2019, 13, 53-63
    Send Orders for Reprints to [email protected] 53 Drug Metabolism Letters, 2019, 13, 53-63 RESEARCH ARTICLE ISSN: 1872-3128 eISSN: 1874-0758 Comparison of Rat and Human Pulmonary Metabolism Using Precision-cut Lung Slices (PCLS) Yildiz Yilmaz1,*, Gareth Williams1, Markus Walles1, Nenad Manevski1, Stephan Krähenbühl2 and Gian Camenisch1 1Pharmacokinetic Sciences, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland; 2Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland Abstract: Background: Although the liver is the primary organ of drug metabolism, the lungs also contain drug-metabolizing enzymes and may, therefore, contribute to the elimination of drugs. In this investigation, the Precision-cut Lung Slice (PCLS) technique was standardized with the aims of charac- terizing and comparing rat and human pulmonary drug metabolizing activity. Method: Due to the limited availability of human lung tissue, standardization of the PCLS method was performed with rat lung tissue. Pulmonary enzymatic activity was found to vary significantly with rat A R T I C L E H I S T O R Y age and rat strain. The Dynamic Organ Culture (DOC) system was superior to well-plates for tissue in- cubations, while oxygen supply appeared to have a limited impact within the 4h incubation period used Received: August 03, 2018 here. Revised: September 28, 2018 Accepted: October 08, 2018 Results: The metabolism of a range of phase I and phase II probe substrates was assessed in rat and DOI: human lung preparations. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) activity was relatively low in both species, whereas 10.2174/1872312812666181022114622 phase II activity appeared to be more significant. Conclusion: PCLS is a promising tool for the investigation of pulmonary drug metabolism.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeting VGLUT Machinery: Implications on Mglur5 Signaling and Behavior
    Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward. Published on July 13, 2020 as DOI: 10.1124/molpharm.120.000089 This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. Targeting VGLUT Machinery: Implications on mGluR5 Signaling and Behavior Karim S. Ibrahim1,2,3, Khaled S. Abd-Elrahman1,2,3, Salah El Mestikawy4,5 and Stephen S. G. Ferguson1,2,* 1 University of Ottawa Brain and Mind Institute, 2 Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8M5, Canada. 3 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Alexandria University, Downloaded from Alexandria, 21521, Egypt. 4 Neuroscience Paris Seine – Institut de Biologie Paris Seine (NPS–IBPS) INSERM, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France. molpharm.aspetjournals.org 5 Department of Psychiatry, Douglas Hospital Research Center, McGill University, Verdun, Quebec, Canada. Abstract: 167 words Introduction: 335 words at ASPET Journals on September 30, 2021 Review Body: 6241 Tables: 1 Figures: 2 Running Title: Crosstalk between VGLUT and mGluR5 *Corresponding author Dr. Stephen S. G. Ferguson Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Dr. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8M5. Tel: (613) 562 5800 Ext 8889. [email protected] 1 Molecular Pharmacology Fast Forward. Published on July 13, 2020 as DOI: 10.1124/molpharm.120.000089 This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. Abstract Crosstalk between both pre- and post-synaptic components of glutamatergic neurotransmission plays a crucial role in orchestrating a multitude of brain functions including synaptic plasticity and motor planning. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) exhibits a promising therapeutic potential for many neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders, as the consequence of its modulatory control over diverse neuronal networks required for memory, motor coordination, neuronal survival and differentiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Fragile X Targeted Pharmacotherapy: Lessons Learned and Future Directions Craig A
    Erickson et al. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2017) 9:7 DOI 10.1186/s11689-017-9186-9 REVIEW Open Access Fragile X targeted pharmacotherapy: lessons learned and future directions Craig A. Erickson1,2*, Matthew H. Davenport1,3, Tori L. Schaefer1, Logan K. Wink1,2, Ernest V. Pedapati1,2, John A. Sweeney2, Sarah E. Fitzpatrick1, W. Ted Brown10, Dejan Budimirovic11,12, Randi J. Hagerman4,5, David Hessl4,6, Walter E. Kaufmann7,8 and Elizabeth Berry-Kravis9 Abstract Our understanding of fragile X syndrome (FXS) pathophysiology continues to improve and numerous potential drug targets have been identified. Yet, current prescribing practices are only symptom-based in order to manage difficult behaviors, as no drug to date is approved for the treatment of FXS. Drugs impacting a diversity of targets in the brain have been studied in recent FXS-specific clinical trials. While many drugs have focused on regulation of enhanced glutamatergic or deficient GABAergic neurotransmission, compounds studied have not been limited to these mechanisms. As a single-gene disorder, it was thought that FXS would have consistent drug targets that could be modulated with pharmacotherapy and lead to significant improvement. Unfortunately, despite promising results in FXS animal models, translational drug treatment development in FXS has largely failed. Future success in this field will depend on learning from past challenges to improve clinical trial design, choose appropriate outcome measures and age range choices, and find readily modulated drug targets. Even with many negative placebo-controlled study results, the field continues to move forward exploring both the new mechanistic drug approaches combined with ways to improve trial execution.
    [Show full text]