DOCSLIB.ORG

Estta499047 10/09/2012 in the United States Patent And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Estta499047 10/09/2012 in the United States Patent And Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov ESTTA Tracking number: ESTTA499047 Filing date: 10/09/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Proceeding 92046185 Party Defendant Pro Football, Inc. Correspondence CLAUDIA BOGDANOS Address QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART AND SULLIVAN LLP 51 MADSION AVENUE, 22ND FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10010 UNITED STATES [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Submission Brief on Merits for Defendant Filer's Name Robert L. Raskopf Filer's e-mail [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Signature /Robert L. Raskopf/ Date 10/09/2012 Attachments Blackhorse v. PFI - Registrant's Trial Brief [redacted].pdf ( 55 pages )(257559 bytes ) Blackhorse v. PFI - Registrant's Trial Brief, App. A.pdf ( 27 pages )(76175 bytes ) Blackhorse v. PFI - Registrant's Trial Brief, App. B.pdf ( 4 pages )(14876 bytes ) Blackhorse v. PFI - Registrant's Trial Brief, App. C.pdf ( 16 pages )(49245 bytes ) Blackhorse v. PFI - Registrant's Trial Brief, App. D.pdf ( 5 pages )(18750 bytes ) REDACTED IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD In re Registration No. 1,606,810 (REDSKINETTES) Registered July 17, 1990, Registration No. 1,085,092 (REDSKINS) Registered February 7, 1978, Registration No. 987,127 (THE REDSKINS & DESIGN) Registered June 25, 1974, Registration No. 986,668 (WASHINGTON REDSKINS & DESIGN) Registered June 18, 1974, Registration No. 978,824 (WASHINGTON REDSKINS) Registered February 12, 1974, and Registration No. 836,122 (THE REDSKINS—STYLIZED LETTERS) Registered September 26, 1967 Amanda Blackhorse, Marcus Briggs, ) Phillip Gover, Jillian Pappan, and ) Courtney Tsotigh, ) ) Petitioners, ) ) Cancellation No. 92/046,185 v. ) ) REGISTRANT’S TRIAL BRIEF Pro-Football, Inc., ) IN OPPOSITION TO THE ) PETITION TO CANCEL ) REGISTRANT’S TRADEMARKS Registrant. ) ) [FILED UNDER SEAL] QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Robert L. Raskopf Claudia T. Bogdanos Todd Anten 51 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10010 Telephone: (212) 849-7000 Attorneys for Registrant Pro-Football, Inc. REDACTED TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 1" STATEMENT OF FACTS ........................................................................................................................... 4" ARGUMENT ................................................................................................................................................ 8" I." PETITIONERS’ EVIDENCE IS FLAWED AND INSUFFICIENT AS A MATTER OF LAW .......................................................................................................................................... 8" A." Inadmissible Expert Testimony ........................................................................................ 10" 1." Irrelevant and Unreliable 1996 Ross Survey ....................................................... 10" (a)" 1996 Data Does Not Inform About 1967, 1974, 1978, and 1990 ........... 11" (b)" Intentional Failure to Obtain Perceptions of the Use of “Redskins” in the Team Name ................................................................ 12" (c)" Flawed Questions in Survey Questionnaire ............................................ 13" (d)" Critically Flawed Sampling Plan and Improper Implementation ........... 14" (e)" Incorrect Tabulation of Survey Results .................................................. 16" 2." Lack of Scientific Basis for Opinions of Geoffrey Nunberg and Susan Courtney .................................................................................................... 17" (a)" Geoffrey Nunberg’s Lack of Scientific Basis ......................................... 17" (b)" Susan Courtney Videotape ...................................................................... 18" 3." Lack of Scientific Basis for the Opinions of Frederick Hoxie ............................. 19" B." Proffer of Immaterial Evidence by Petitioners’ Fact Witnesses ....................................... 20" 1." Purported NCAI Resolution ................................................................................. 20" 2." Letter Written By Harold Gross ........................................................................... 20" 3." Evidence Reflecting Actions of the Media and Registrant’s Fans ....................... 21" II." REGISTRANT’S MARKS DO NOT DISPARAGE NATIVE AMERICANS OR BRING NATIVE AMERICANS INTO CONTEMPT OR DISREPUTE ..................................... 22" A." The “Redskins” Name, as Used By Registrant, Is Not Disparaging ................................. 22" 1." Ethnic Names for Sports Teams Are Acceptable ................................................ 25" i REDACTED 2." The Word “Redskins” Has a Distinctive, Distinct, and Non-Disparaging Meaning as the Name of the NFL Team ................................. 25" 3." The Manner of Registrant’s Use Has Been Wholly Respectful ........................... 29" 4." Native Americans Support the Team Name ........................................................ 33" B." The Word “Redskin” Is Not Disparaging Per Se .............................................................. 37" 1." Dictionary Evidence ............................................................................................ 38" 2." Literary and Scholarly Uses ................................................................................. 40" 3." Expert Conclusions on Neutrality of the Term .................................................... 43" 4." Native Americans Use the Word “redskin” ......................................................... 45" III." PETITIONERS’ CLAIMS ARE BARRED BY LACHES ............................................................ 45" A." Petitioners Unreasonably Delayed in Filing Suit .............................................................. 46" B." Petitioners’ Unreasonable Delay Materially Prejudiced Registrant .................................. 48" CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................... 50" ii REDACTED TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page Cases Am. Bakeries Co. v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co., 650 F. Supp. 2d 563 (D. Minn. 1986) .................................................................................................... 1 Bridgestone/Firestone Research, Inc. v. Automobile Club De L’Ouest De La France, 245 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2001) ............................................................................................................ 48 Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) ...................................................................................................................... passim Doughboy Indus., Inc. v. The Reese Chem. Co., 88 USPQ 227 (Chief Examiner 1951) .................................................................................................. 31 Gen. Mills, Inc. v. Fage Dairy Processing Indus. S.A., 100 USPQ2d 1584 (TTAB 2011) ......................................................................................................... 22 Goya Foods, Inc. v. Tropicana Prods., Inc., 846 F.2d 848 (2d Cir. 1988) ................................................................................................................... 1 Greyhound Corp. v. Both Worlds, Inc., 6 USPQ2d 1635 (TTAB 1988) ............................................................................................................. 24 Harjo v. Pro-Football, Inc., 50 USPQ2d 1705 (TTAB 1999) .................................................................................................... passim In re Hershey, 6 USPQ2d 1470 (TTAB 1988) ................................................................................................. 25, 31, 34 In re Hines, 32 USPQ2d 1376 (TTAB 1994) ......................................................................................... 20, 21, 23, 33 In re In Over Our Heads, 16 USPQ2d 1653 (TTAB 1990) ......................................................................................... 23, 25, 28, 38 In re Condas S.A., 188 USPQ 544 (TTAB 1975) ......................................................................................................... 28, 31 In re Mavety Media Group Ltd., 31 USPQ2d 1923 (TTAB 1994) ..................................................................................................... 25, 35 In re McGinley, 660 F.2d 481 (CCPA 1981) .................................................................................................................. 50 In re Reemtsma Cigarettenfabriken G.M.B.H., 122 USPQ 339 (TTAB 1959) ............................................................................................................... 24 In re Riverbank Canning, Co., 25 C.C.P.A. 1028 (CCPA 1938) ........................................................................................................... 24 iii REDACTED In re Sociedade Agricola E. Commercial Dos Vinhos Messias, S.A.R.L., 159 USPQ 275 (TTAB 1968) ............................................................................................................... 24 In re Squaw Valley Dev. Co., 80 USPQ2d 1264 (TTAB 2006) ..........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Blackhorse V. Pro Football
    THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Hearing: Mailed: March 7, 2013 June 18, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ Amanda Blackhorse, Marcus Briggs-Cloud, Philip Gover, Jillian Pappan, and Courtney Tsotigh v. Pro-Football, Inc. _____ Cancellation No. 92046185 _____ Jesse A. Witten, Jeffrey J. Lopez, John D. V. Ferman, Lee Roach and Stephen Wallace of Drinker, Biddle & Reath LLP for Amanda Blackhorse, Marcus Briggs, Philip Gover, Jillian Pappan, and Courtney Tsotigh. Robert L. Raskopf, Claudia T. Bogdanos and Todd Anten of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP for Pro-Football, Inc. _____ Before Kuhlke, Cataldo and Bergsman, Administrative Trademark Judges. Opinion by Kuhlke, Administrative Trademark Judge: OVERVIEW Petitioners, five Native Americans, have brought this cancellation proceeding pursuant to Section 14 of the Trademark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C. § 1064(c). They seek to cancel respondent’s registrations issued between 1967 and 1990 for Cancellation No. 92046185 trademarks consisting in whole or in part of the term REDSKINS for professional football-related services on the ground that the registrations were obtained contrary to Section 2(a), 15 U.S.C. § 1052(a), which prohibits registration of marks that may disparage persons or bring them into contempt or disrepute. In its answer, defendant, Pro-Football, Inc., asserted various affirmative defenses including laches.1 As explained below, we decide, based on the evidence properly before us, that these registrations must be cancelled because they were disparaging to Native Americans at the respective times they were registered, in violation of Section 2(a) of the Trademark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Pro-Football, Inc. V. Blackhorse
    Case 1:14-cv-01043-GBL-IDD Document 71 Filed 02/26/15 Page 1 of 45 PageID# 1176 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION PRO-FOOTBALL, INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No.: 1:14-cv-1043-GBL-IDD v. AMANDA BLACKHORSE, MARCUS BRIGGS-CLOUD, PHILLIP GOVER, JILLIAN PAPPAN and COURTNEY TSOTIGH, Defendants. DEFENDANTS’ MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNTS 1, 2, AND 7 Jesse A. Witten (pro hac vice) Jeffrey J. Lopez (VA Bar No. 51058) Adam Scott Kunz (VA Bar No. 84073) Tore T. DeBella (VA Bar No. 82037) Jennifer T. Criss (VA Bar No. 86143) DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 1500 K Street, N.W., Suite 1100 Washington, D.C. 20005-1209 Telephone: (202) 842-8800 Facsimile: (202) 842-8465 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Defendants Amanda Blackhorse, Marcus Briggs-Cloud, Phillip Gover, Jillian Pappan and Courtney Tsotigh Case 1:14-cv-01043-GBL-IDD Document 71 Filed 02/26/15 Page 2 of 45 PageID# 1177 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................... 1 PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND ................................................................................................ 3 THE BLACKHORSE RECORD AND SUPPLEMENTATION ................................................. 4 MATERIAL FACTS AS TO WHICH THERE IS NO GENUINE ISSUE ............................... 5 A. PFI Adopted The Current Team Name In 1933 To Avoid Confusion With The Boston Braves Baseball Team, Not To Honor Native Americans. ................... 5 B. Dictionaries, Reference Works, Other Written Sources, and Native Americans Expressly Recognize the Disparaging Nature Of The Term “Redskin.” ................................................................................................................. 6 1. Dictionaries ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Missing the Point: the Real Impact of Native Mascots and Team Names
    American University Washington College of Law Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law Reports Scholarship & Research 7-2014 Missing the Point: The Real Impact of Native Mascots and Team Names on American Indian and Alaska Native Youth Victoria Phillips American University Washington College of Law, [email protected] Erik Stegman Center for American Progress Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/fasch_rpt Recommended Citation Stegman, Erik and Phillips, Victoria F., Missing the Point: The Real Impact of Native Mascots and Team Names on American Indian and Alaska Native Youth. Center for American Progress, July 2014. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Scholarship & Research at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AP PHOTO/SETH PERLMAN PHOTO/SETH AP Missing the Point The Real Impact of Native Mascots and Team Names on American Indian and Alaska Native Youth By Erik Stegman and Victoria Phillips July 2014 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Missing the Point The Real Impact of Native Mascots and Team Names on American Indian and Alaska Native Youth By Erik Stegman and Victoria Phillips July 2014 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 4 Hostile learning environments 7 The suicide crisis and other challenges facing AI/AN youth 9 The long movement to retire racist mascots and team names 20 Recommendations 23 Conclusion 26 Endnotes Introduction and summary The debate over the racist name and mascot of the professional football team based in the nation’s capital, the “Redskins,” has reached a fever pitch in recent months.1 Fifty U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Native American Team Names in the Formative Era of American Sports, 1857-1933
    BEFORE THE REDSKINS WERE THE REDSKINS: THE USE OF NATIVE AMERICAN TEAM NAMES IN THE FORMATIVE ERA OF AMERICAN SPORTS, 1857-1933 J. GORDON HYLTON* L INTRODUCTION 879 IL CURRENT SENTIMENT 881 III. A BRIEF HISTORY OF NATIVE AMERICAN TEAM NAMES 886 IV. THE FIRST USAGES OF NATIVE AMERICAN TEAM NAMES IN AMERICAN SPORT 890 A. NATIVE AMERICAN TEAM NAMES IN EARLY BASEBALL .... 891 B. NATIVE AMERICAN TEAMS NAMES IN EARLY PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL 894 C. NATIVE AMERICAN TEAM NAMES IN COLLEGE SPORT 900 V. CONCLUSION 901 I. INTRODUCTION The Native American team name and mascot controversy has dismpted the world of American sports for more than six decades. In the 1940s, the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) began a campaign against a variety of negative and unfiattering stereotypes of Indians in American culture.' Over time, the campaign began to focus on the use of Native American team names—like Indians and Redskins—and mascots by college and professional sports teams.2 The NCAI's basic argument was that the use of such names, mascots, and logos was offensive and *J. Gordon Hylton is Professor of Law at Marquette University and Visiting Professor of Law at the University of Virginia. He is a graduate of Oberlin College and the University of Virginia Law School and holds a PhD in the History of American Civilization from Harvard. From 1997 to 1999, he was Director ofthe National Sports Law Institute and is the current Chair-Elect ofthe Association of American Law Schools Section on Law and Sport. 1. See Our History, NCAI, http://www.ncai.Org/Our-History.14.0.html (last visited Apr.
    [Show full text]
  • Engagement Toolkit: Investors Demand Washington Team #Changethename
    Engagement Toolkit: Investors Demand Washington Team #ChangeTheName Investors representing more than $620 billion in assets have called for NIKE, PepsiCo and FedEx to terminate business with the NFL’s Washington D.C. franchise if it does not stop using the racial slur “Redskins” as its name. Individual letters: NIKE • PepsiCo • FedEx ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ An initiative of the Investors and Indigenous Peoples ​ Workgroup (IIPWG), the inviting group is led by First ​ Peoples Worldwide, Oneida Trust, Trillium Asset Management, Boston Trust Walden, Boston Common Asset Management, First Affirmative Financial Network, and Mercy Investments, which have been engaging companies for years seeking an end to the use of the racist name and logo. We invite everyone to please share news of this initiative widely. Suggested content and engagement tools: ​ SAMPLE TWEETS / TALKING POINTS ● With the #BlackLivesMatter movement bringing to focus centuries of systemic racism, there is a fresh outpouring of opposition to the @nfl team name @Redskins – a racist, dehumanizing word with hateful connotations. Sponsors @Nike, @PepsiCo & @FedEx must call to #ChangeTheName. ● Sponsors @Nike, @PepsiCo & @FedEx can meet the magnitude of this moment and make opposition to the @nfl @Redskins team name clear, and take tangible and meaningful steps to exert pressure on the team to cease using its racist name. #ChangeTheName #TheTimeIsNow ● Racist team names like @Redskins are not just words – they are symbols that loudly and clearly signal disrespect to Native Americans. @nfl
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Native American Team Names in the Formative Era of American Sports, 1857-1933
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota) North Dakota Law Review Volume 86 Number 4 Article 7 1-1-2010 Before the Redskins Were the Redskins: The Use of Native American Team Names in the Formative Era of American Sports, 1857-1933 J. Gordon Hylton Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/ndlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Hylton, J. Gordon (2010) "Before the Redskins Were the Redskins: The Use of Native American Team Names in the Formative Era of American Sports, 1857-1933," North Dakota Law Review: Vol. 86 : No. 4 , Article 7. Available at: https://commons.und.edu/ndlr/vol86/iss4/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Dakota Law Review by an authorized editor of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BEFORE THE REDSKINS WERE THE REDSKINS: THE USE OF NATIVE AMERICAN TEAM NAMES IN THE FORMATIVE ERA OF AMERICAN SPORTS, 1857-1933 J. GORDON HYLTON* I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................... 879 II. CURRENT SENTIMENT .......................................................... 881 III. A BRIEF HISTORY OF NATIVE AMERICAN TEAM NAMES ....................................................................................... 886 IV. THE FIRST USAGES OF NATIVE AMERICAN TEAM NAMES IN AMERICAN SPORT .............................................. 890 A. NATIVE AMERICAN TEAM NAMES IN EARLY BASEBALL .... 891 B. NATIVE AMERICAN TEAMS NAMES IN EARLY PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL ................................................... 894 C. NATIVE AMERICAN TEAM NAMES IN COLLEGE SPORT ....... 900 V. CONCLUSION ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download Press
    PRESS KIT THE CIESLA FOUNDATION PRESENTS IMAGINING THE INDIAN THE FIGHT AGAINST NATIVE AMERICAN MASCOTING www.imaginingtheindianfilm.org FROM THE DIRECTOR OF The Spy Behind Home Plate, Rosenwald and The Life and Times of Hank Greenberg National / New York To schedule an interview for a sports publication: Adam J. Segal of The 2050 Group – Publicity: 212.642.4317 Fred Sternburg at Sternburg Communications: 303.548-0707, [email protected] [email protected] Outreach and Booking the To schedule an interview for Work-in-Progress: an entertainment publication: The Ciesla Foundation Ziggy Kozlowski at Block-Korenbrot Public Relations, (323) 634-7001, [email protected] [email protected] IMAGINING THE INDIAN PRESS KIT 2 LONG SYNOPSIS Log Line Imagining the Indian: The Fight Against Native the genocidal history of Native peoples on this American Mascoting is a feature-length doc- continent, and its role in proliferating negative Imagining the Indian examines the ongoing umentary film that examines the movement stereotyping in sports, movies and televi- movement surrounding the use of Native to eliminate the use of Native American slurs, sion. American names, logos, and mascots in the names, logos, images and gestures that many world of sports and beyond. A range of opinions are explored among Na- Native Americans and their allies find demean- tives and non-Natives, including the staunch ing and offensive. and steadfast opposition exhibited by Harjo The film investigates the impact that carica- and her contemporaries in advocacy
    [Show full text]
  • The Fight Against Pro Football, Inc
    SOCIAL ISSUES Get Indian Country Today, our FREE X Newsletter Vincent Schilling RayEnter Halbritter your on email Suzan address Shown Harjo: “Suzan Shown Harjo has been one of the greatest civil rights heroes in the last few decades.” SIGN UP & DOWNLOAD YOUR FREE GIFT NOW » The Fight Against Pro Football, Inc.: 25 Years of Reversing Injustice and Raising Awareness An interview with Suzan Shown Harjo on the eve of the 25th anniversary of start of a legal battle to end the racist nickname of the Washington football team Alex Jacobs • September 4, 2017 th https://indiancountrymedianetwork.com/culture/social-issues/fight-pro-football-25-years-reversing-injustice-raising-awareness/ 9/7/17, 647 PM Page 1 of 27 Editor’s Note: September 10, 2017 marks the 25th anniversary of the combined years of active litigation of Suzan Shown Harjo, et al v. Pro Football, Inc., and Amanda Blackhorse, et al v. Pro Football, Inc., identical cases to cancel the existing trademark licenses of the Washington NFL team (Harjo, et al, filed September 10, 1992, ended in December 2009 after 17 years of active litigation; Blackhorse et al, was filed August 11, 2006, but held in abeyance pending outcome of the Harjo case, so its 8 years of active litigation span 2010 to 2017); and the diferent matter of Harjo, et al, Letters of Protest of new requests for the same name (the protests were accepted by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Ofce, which held them in abeyance pending outcome of the Blackhorse case – 2010 to 2017). ICMN: Suzan, there is an argument out there that Native Peoples have not objected to these racist mascots and logos until recent times, and most aren’t bothered by them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lanham Act's Prohibition of Trademarks That
    Oklahoma Law Review Volume 68 Number 4 2016 Blackhawk Down or Blackhorse Down? The Lanham Act’s Prohibition of Trademarks that “May Disparage” & the First Amendment Russ VerSteeg Professor, New England Law | Boston Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/olr Part of the First Amendment Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Russ VerSteeg, Blackhawk Down or Blackhorse Down? The Lanham Act’s Prohibition of Trademarks that “May Disparage” & the First Amendment, 68 OKLA. L. REV. 677 (2016), https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/olr/vol68/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Oklahoma Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW VOLUME 68 SUMMER 2016 NUMBER 4 BLACKHAWK DOWN OR BLACKHORSE DOWN? THE LANHAM ACT’S PROHIBITION OF TRADEMARKS THAT “MAY DISPARAGE” & THE FIRST AMENDMENT * RUSS VERSTEEG [A] function of free speech . is to invite dispute. It may indeed best serve its high purpose when it induces a condition of unrest, creates dissatisfaction with conditions as they are, or even stirs people to anger. Speech is often provocative and challenging. It may strike at prejudices and preconceptions and have profound unsettling effects . [T]he alternative would lead to standardization of ideas either by legislatures, courts, or dominant political or community groups.1 —Justice William O. Douglas Introduction During the past three decades the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO), the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), and our federal courts have examined the “may disparage” prohibition of § 2(a) of * Professor, New England Law | Boston.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Change the Mascot: the Washington Redskins, Offensive Trademarks
    Change the Mascot: the Washington Redskins, Offensive Trademarks, Freedom of Speech, and Racism in Sport Matthew Rimmer There has been a long history of conflict and disputation in respect of Indigenous Intellectual Property.1 In the United States, there has often been controversy over representations of Native Americans in trademark law. There has been intensive public and legal debate over offensive trademarks, such as the Washington Redskins.2 The Navajo activist Amanda Blackhorse has led a campaign to cancel the trademarks of the Washington Football team – the Washington Redskins. She observed: 1 Matthew Rimmer (ed.), Indigenous Intellectual Property: A Handbook of Contemporary Research, Cheltenham (UK) and Northampton (Mass.): Edward Elgar, December 2015, http://www.e- elgar.com/shop/indigenous-intellectual-property 2 Christine Haight Farley, ‘Stabilizing Morality in Trademark Law’ (2014) 63 American University Law Review 1019–1050; Fred Hiatt, ‘Moving Beyond the “Imaginary Indians” Perception’, The Washington Post, 21 September 2014, http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/fred-hiatt-moving-beyond-the-imaginary-indians- perception/2014/09/21/ea1ee614-3f3b-11e4-9587-5dafd96295f0_story.html; Steve Vladek, ‘The Washington Redskins, the Lanham Act, and Article III’, The Prawfs Blog, 23 September 2014, http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2014/09/the-washington-redskins-the-lanham-act-and-article- iii.html; and Alison Keyes, ‘What a Lawsuit Against the Redskins Could Mean for the Brand’, National Public Radio, 31 May 2013, http://www.npr.org/blogs/codeswitch/2013/05/31/187636561/What-A-Lawsuit-Against- The-Redskins-Could-Mean-For-The-Brand 1 This is such a huge victory not only for, you know, our group, but for Native Americans all over the nation….
    [Show full text]
  • Competing Constructions of the Washington Redskins Mascot
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2016 Redskins Revisited: Competing Constructions of the Washington Redskins Mascot Eean Grimshaw University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons, and the Speech and Rhetorical Studies Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Grimshaw, Eean, "Redskins Revisited: Competing Constructions of the Washington Redskins Mascot" (2016). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 10641. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/10641 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Running Head: REDSKINS REVISITED REDSKINS REVISITED: COMPETING CONSTRCTIONS OF THE WASHINGTON REDSKINS MASCOT By EEAN BRUCE GRIMSHAW Bachelor of Arts, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, 2012 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Arts in Communication Studies The University of Montana Missoula, MT May 2016 Approved by: Scott Whittenburg, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School Steve Schwarze, Chair Communication Studies Alan Sillars Communication Studies Dave Beck Native American Studies REDSKINS REVISITED ii Grimshaw, Eean, M.A., Spring 2016 Communication Studies Competing Constructions of the Washington Redskins Mascot Adviser: Dr. Steve Schwarze This project looks at how synecdoche and ideographs function in the construction of competing position in the controversy surrounding the Washington Redskins mascot.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
    IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD In re Registration No. 1,606,810 (REDSKINETTES) Registered July 17, 1990, Registration No. 1,085,092 (REDSKINS) Registered February 7, 1978, Registration No. 987,127 (THE REDSKINS & DESIGN) Registered June 25, 1974, Registration No. 986,668 (WASHINGTON REDSKINS & DESIGN) Registered June 18, 1974, Registration No. 978,824 (WASHINGTON REDSKINS) Registered February 12, 1974, and Registration No. 836,122 (THE REDSKINS—STYLIZED LETTERS) Registered September 26, 1967 Amanda Blackhorse, Marcus Briggs-Cloud, ) Phillip Gover, Jillian Papan and Courtney Tsotigh, ) ) Petitioners, ) ) Cancellation No. 92/046,185 v. ) ) Pro-Football, Inc., ) ) Registrant. ) ) PETITIONERS’ TRIAL BRIEF Jesse A. Witten Jeffrey J. Lopez John D. V. Ferman Lee Roach Stephen J. Wallace DRINKER, BIDDLE & REATH LLP 1500 K Street, N.W., Suite 1100 Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 842-8800 Counsel for Petitioners TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 II. BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................... 1 A. Procedural History ........................................................................................................ 1 B. The Parties’ Stipulation Regarding Admissibility Of Harjo Evidence ........................ 3 C. The Harjo Proceedings ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]