DOCSLIB.ORG

EU ANNUAL REPORT on HUMAN RIGHTS and DEMOCRACY in the WORLD 2020 Photo Front Page © UNESCO EU ANNUAL REPORT on HUMAN RIGHTS and DEMOCRACY in the WORLD 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EU ANNUAL REPORT on HUMAN RIGHTS and DEMOCRACY in the WORLD 2020 Photo Front Page © UNESCO EU ANNUAL REPORT on HUMAN RIGHTS and DEMOCRACY in the WORLD 2020 EU ANNUAL REPORT ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRACY IN THE WORLD 2020 Photo front page © UNESCO EU ANNUAL REPORT ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRACY IN THE WORLD 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD BY JOSEP BORRELL ....................................................................05 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 08 EU SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS ......................... 10 01. PROTECTING AND EMPOWERING INDIVIDUALS ............................16 1.1 Protecting people, eliminating inequalities, discrimination and exclusion .............................................................................16 > The death penalty ........................................................................................................16 > Torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ..........................................................................................................................19 > Human rights defenders ......................................................................................... 24 > Tackling multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination ...................30 > Freedom of religion or belief ..................................................................................33 > Human rights of persons belonging to minorities...................................... 38 > Gender equality, sexual orientation and gender identity, eliminating sexual and gender-based violence and continued commitment to sexual and reproductive health and rights as per the New European Consensus on Development.............................40 > Rights of the child .......................................................................................................59 > Migration and mobility – migrants, refugees and asylum seekers .......... 64 1.2 Empowering people .......................................................................................73 > Empowering women .................................................................................................73 > Empowering children and youth ..........................................................................75 > Rights of persons with disabilities ......................................................................77 > Human rights of older persons ............................................................................80 > Rights of indigenous peoples ............................................................................... 82 1.3 Promoting fundamental freedoms and strengthening civic and political space ...................................................................................................85 > Freedom of expression .............................................................................................85 > Safety of journalists ..................................................................................................88 > The environment, climate change and human rights .................................91 > Economic, social and cultural rights ..................................................................96 > Labour rights ...............................................................................................................102 1.5 Supporting the rule of law and the fair administration of justice ........................................................................................................... 108 > Human rights and counter-terrorism ............................................................. 108 > The International Criminal Court ........................................................................110 1.6 Closing the accountability gap, fighting impunity and supporting transitional justice ................................................................................................... 114 02. BUILDING RESILIENT, INCLUSIVE AND DEMOCRATIC SOCIETIES ............................................................................................................120 2.1 Enhancing democratic, accountable and transparent institutions .................................................................... 120 2.2 Promoting responsive, inclusive, participatory and representative decision-making .......................................................................................... 125 2.3 Supporting independent and pluralistic media, access to information and the fight against disinformation ......................... 127 2.4 Reinforcing a human rights and participative approach to conflict prevention and crisis resolution ........................................... 134 03. PROMOTING A GLOBAL SYSTEM FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRACY ..........................................................................................146 3.1 Multilateral cooperation .............................................................................146 3.2 Regional partnerships.................................................................................153 > The EU in the Council of Europe ..........................................................................153 > The EU in the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe.......................................................................................................................156 > The EU and the Organisation for Islamic Cooperation .............................158 > The EU and the African Union ..............................................................................158 3.3 Bilateral cooperation ...................................................................................159 3.4 Civil society and national human rights institutions .....................162 3.5 Business sector ..............................................................................................170 3.6 Compliance with international human rights and international humanitarian law ................................................................................................174 04. NEW TECHNOLOGIES: HARNESSING OPPORTUNITIES AND ADDRESSING CHALLENGES .....................................................................178 4.1 Capacity building and effective monitoring ......................................178 4.2 Promoting human rights and democracy in the use of digital technologies, including artificial intelligence ................................. 181 05. DELIVERING BY WORKING TOGETHER .............................................189 5.1 Public diplomacy and strategic communication ..............................189 FOREWORD BY JOSEP BORRELL 2020 was undoubtedly a challenging year. The COVID-19 global pandemic not only put our health and lives at risk, but also exacerbated economic and social inequalities, led to an increase in domestic violence and hampered © European Union © European the right to education for many children. We witnessed the shrinking of civic space, the Josep BORRELL flourishing of disinformation and authoritarian High Representative trends growing. of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and In these unprecedented times, the EU continued Security Policy to stand up for human rights and democracy and to respond to new challenges, including to protect the rights of vulnerable communities. The EUSR for Human Rights, Eamon Gilmore, focused particular attention during 2020 on efforts to reduce the spread of the COVID-19 virus in places of detention around the world. One of the highest profile EU actions in 2020 against human rights violations and abuses was the establishment of a dedicated EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime. This decision was not taken lightly but based firstly on the firm conviction that the EU could and should do more and secondly, on our experience, which has shown that words are not always enough. With this new sanctions regime, we sent a clear message that human rights abuses will not be tolerated, no matter where they happen. The EU also adopted its new Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy (2020-2024) – a roadmap of actionable priorities–placing human rights front and centre in its external action. But the EU is not only Brussels. EU Delegations have been at the forefront of human rights promotion and protection. In Sierra Leone and many other countries applying the death penalty, the EU Delegations together with partners advocated for the abolition of the death penalty and ensured access to legal representation and effective right to appeal for prisoners on death row. When in May 2020 Sudan decided to outlaw female’s genital mutilation, the EU supported Khartoum to implement this bold and historic step towards the realisation of women’s and girls’ rights, including through the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in Sudan. In Colombia, the EU conducted a public diplomacy campaign to address the problem of sexism and supported the government in its national strategy against machismo. In Thailand, the EU-funded project ‘Ship to Shore Rights’ helped the government to combat forced labour in the fishing and seafood industries. Through the Human Rights Defenders Mechanism ProtectDefenders.eu, the EU helped 450 human rights defenders to combat digital threats. These are some of the examples of the EU action outlined in this report. Multilateralism is the only effective format to deal with global challenges. Around the globe the EU continues to invest in effective multilateral cooperation including at the UN-level. The EU strongly supports the International Criminal Court and promotes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reaching LGBT Travelers: Taiwan Report Profile of Taiwanese International Visitors
    2017 Taiwan LGBT Travel Trends LGBT Market Intelligence Report | Reaching LGBT Travelers: Taiwan Report Profile of Taiwanese International Visitors May 2017 Produced by 1 2017 Taiwan LGBT Travel Trends LGBT Market Intelligence Report | ABOUT CMI 25 YEARS OF LGBT INSIGHTS › Community Marketing & Insights (CMI) has been conducting LGBT consumer research for 25 years. Our practice includes online surveys, in-depth interviews, intercepts, focus groups (on-site and online), and advisory boards. Industry leaders around the world depend on CMI’s research and analysis as a basis for feasibility evaluations, positioning, economic impact, creative testing, informed forecasting, measurable marketing planning and assessment of return on investment. › Key findings have been published in the New York Times, Washington Post, Chicago Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Wall Street Journal, Forbes, USA Today, Chicago Tribune, Miami Herald, CBS News, NPR, CNN, Reuters, Associated Press, eMarketer, Mashable, and many other international, national and regional media. › CMI’s other research clients include leaders from a wide range of industries. In the past few years, studies have been produced for these and many other clients: VISIT FLORIDA, Empire State Development Corp., Las Vegas Convention & Visitors Authority, NYC & Company, Visit Orlando, Greater Fort Lauderdale CVB, Palm Springs Bureau of Tourism, Travel Portland, Choose Chicago, Tourism Toronto, Argentina Tourism Office, Hawaiian Airlines, Hyatt Hotels, Prudential, Wells Fargo Bank, Aetna, Target Brands,
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded At
    THE BROWN MOMENT IN TAIWAN: MAKING SENSE OF THE LAW AND POLITICS OF THE TAIWANESE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE CASE IN A COMPARATIVE LIGHT Ming-Sung Kuo & Hui-Wen Chen+ The Taiwan Constitutional Court (TCC) recently issued a landmark decision in Interpretation No. 748 (the Same-Sex Marriage Case), declaring the definition of marriage as a gender-differentiated union of a man and a woman under the Civil Code unconstitutional and setting the stage for Taiwan to become the first in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage. This decision has been compared to Obergefell v. Hodges. However, reading Obergefell in the broad context of the gay rights movement and the role of judicial review in Taiwanese constitutional politics, we challenge this analogy. Due to the discrepancy between the social movement and the law in the fight for constitutional rights for gays and lesbians in Taiwan, the Same-Sex Marriage Case is Taiwan’s Brown v. Board of Education moment in her constitutional law and politics. To make sense of the law and politics of the Same Sex Marriage Case, we evaluate its political context and the text and style in its reasoning. We observe a discrepancy between law and politics in the pursuit of the constitutional rights of gays and lesbians in Taiwan. The rise of same-sex marriage to the top of the antidiscrimination agenda resulted from the continuous effort of gay rights activists, while the TCC watched this movement from the sidelines until the Same-Sex Marriage Case. This case thus mirrors Brown in two respects. First, the role of the TCC has been publicly questioned after its Brown-like contentious decision on the issue of same-sex marriage.
    [Show full text]
  • A World Like Ours: Gay Men in Japanese Novels and Films
    A WORLD LIKE OURS: GAY MEN IN JAPANESE NOVELS AND FILMS, 1989-2007 by Nicholas James Hall A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Asian Studies) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) December 2013 © Nicholas James Hall, 2013 Abstract This dissertation examines representations of gay men in contemporary Japanese novels and films produced from around the beginning of the 1990s so-called gay boom era to the present day. Although these were produced in Japanese and for the Japanese market, and reflect contemporary Japan’s social, cultural and political milieu, I argue that they not only articulate the concerns and desires of gay men and (other queer people) in Japan, but also that they reflect a transnational global gay culture and identity. The study focuses on the work of current Japanese writers and directors while taking into account a broad, historical view of male-male eroticism in Japan from the Edo era to the present. It addresses such issues as whether there can be said to be a Japanese gay identity; the circulation of gay culture across international borders in the modern period; and issues of representation of gay men in mainstream popular culture products. As has been pointed out by various scholars, many mainstream Japanese representations of LGBT people are troubling, whether because they represent “tourism”—they are made for straight audiences whose pleasure comes from being titillated by watching the exotic Others portrayed in them—or because they are made by and for a female audience and have little connection with the lives and experiences of real gay men, or because they circulate outside Japan and are taken as realistic representations by non-Japanese audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTIONS 1. Audience - AUD ........................................................................................................ 4 2. Communication Policy & Technology - CPT ............................................................. 14 3. Community Communication - COC ......................................................................... 27 4. Emerging Scholars - ESN ......................................................................................... 42 5. Gender and Communication - GEC .......................................................................... 50 6. History - HIS ........................................................................................................... 61 7. International Communication - INC ........................................................................ 67 8. Journalism ResearcH & Education - JRE + UNESCO .................................................. 83 9. Law - LAW ............................................................................................................ 106 10. Media and Sport - MES ....................................................................................... 113 11. Media Education ResearcH - MER ....................................................................... 117 12. Mediated Communication, Public Opinion & Society - MPS ................................ 122 13. Participatory Communication ResearcH - PCR ..................................................... 129 14. Political Communication - POL ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Untying the Knot: Making Peace in the Taiwan Strait
    asia policy, number 2 (july 2006), 109–139 book review roundtable Richard C. Bush’s Untying the Knot: Making Peace in the Taiwan Strait Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2005 ISBN: 0-815-71288-X (hardcover) Allen Carlson Derek Mitchell Lyle Goldstein Dan Blumenthal Mark Williams Steven M. Goldstein Richard C. Bush © The National Bureau of Asian Research, Seattle, Washington asia policy (K)not Yet Untied: Comments on Richard Bush’s Untying the Knot Allen Carlson ichard Bush, who served as the acting director of the American Institute R in Taiwan from 1997 to 2002, is one of America’s most experienced observers of Taiwanese politics. His new book, Untying the Knot, clearly reflects such expertise, and forwards a timely, comprehensive, and fairly well- balanced account of the evolution of contemporary cross-Strait relations. The book makes two main contributions to the already vast literature on this potentially explosive relationship. First, Bush attempts to explain the tenacity of conflict across the Taiwan Strait. As an initial step, he identifies sovereignty and security as forming the interlocking core of the conflictual relationship between Beijing and Taipei. He then calls attention to three “aggravating” factors—domestic politics, the decisionmaking process, and leverage-seeking—that have made this volatile situation even more intractable. As a second contribution, Bush suggests a set of policy measures that, if enacted, would be conducive to lessening tensions and reducing the chances of outright military conflict across the Taiwan Strait. More specifically, he recommends that Beijing move beyond the “one country, two systems” formula. Taipei is encouraged not only to refrain from pushing Beijing into a corner (via formal measures to declare Taiwan’s independence) but also to strengthen Taiwan’s own status both at home and abroad in order to maintain its negotiating position vis-à-vis the mainland.
    [Show full text]
  • Download.Php?Rpt=Nmt
    Distribution Agreement In presenting this thesis or dissertation as a partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree from Emory University, I hereby grant to Emory University and its agents the non-exclusive license to archive, make accessible, and display my thesis or dissertation in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known, including display on the world wide web. I understand that I may select some access restrictions as part of the online submission of this thesis or dissertation. I retain all ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis or dissertation. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis or dissertation. Signature: _____________________________ ______________ Byung’chu Dredge Käng Date White Asians Wanted: Queer Racialization in Thailand By Byung’chu Dredge Käng Doctor of Philosophy Anthropology _________________________________________ Peter J. Brown Advisor _________________________________________ Chikako Ozawa-de Silva Committee Member _________________________________________ Michael Peletz Committee Member _________________________________________ Megan Sinott Committee Member Accepted: _________________________________________ Lisa A. Tedesco, Ph.D. Dean of the James T. Laney School of Graduate Studies ___________________ Date White Asians Wanted: Queer Racialization in Thailand By Byung’chu Dredge Käng M.A., Emory University, 2009 Advisor: Peter J. Brown, Ph.D. An abstract of A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the James T. Laney School of Graduate Studies of Emory University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology 2015 Abstract White Asians Wanted: Queer Racialization in Thailand By Byung’chu Dredge Käng Scholarly and popular literature often asserts that Caucasian partners are the most desirable, given the political and economic dominance of the West, its media, and beauty ideals.
    [Show full text]
  • China Dreams 梦
    CHINA DREAMS 梦 EDITED BY Jane Golley, Linda Jaivin Ben Hillman, WITH Sharon Strange C HINA S TORY YEARBOOK : C HINA D REAM S Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] Available to download for free at press.anu.edu.au ISBN (print): 9781760463731 ISBN (online): 9781760463748 WorldCat (print): 1145684061 WorldCat (online): 1145684091 DOI: 10.22459/CSY.2020 This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ legalcode Design concept by Markuz Wernli; ‘Power’ cover design and chapter openers by CRE8IVE Typesetting by Chin-Jie Melodie Liu and Sharon Strange; copyediting by Jan Borrie Printed by Union Offset Printers, Canberra, Australia The Australian Centre on China in the World is an initiative of the Commonwealth Government of Australia and The Australian National University This edition © 2020 ANU Press 揭秘错综时事蓄 美梦 民族伟大复兴之梦对中国与世界民众而言为何种图景因编辑婴儿事件续镇压维吾尔族群倡导中国公民应在国际场合﹃维护国家荣誉﹄压破碎学生运动三十周年整庆祝中华人民共和国成立七十周年弘扬革命与国家富强之梦2019 ， 多元视角呈现政经文化与人文社会之一脉相连、 。 泡影 2019年 、 ， 凌云壮志与梦魇于中外大地上相吸相斥之画卷 为中国在全球日渐隆盛势力与影响提供解惑之匙， 拓展南极与称霸太空的雄心亦甚嚣尘上、 有鉴于此 日益恶化中美关系成为媒体焦点， ， 各领风骚年中国恰逢几个划时代意义的周年纪念日 几多旧﹃梦﹄重回民主与言论自由在凌晨的梦乡中被政府的安定团结之梦碾 ， 。 ︽中国故事年鉴 五四运动百年祭重温爱国情怀与文化革新之梦 ， 粉墨登场 。 ： 香港暴力抗争风起云涌 梦︾钩沉是年重大事件 。 ， 。 。 本年鉴以浅显易懂的笔触一时庙堂江湖舆情四起人工智能的突飞猛进与基习近平主席权倾天下 。 ; 习近平脑海中的中华 。 并一如既往兼容并 是年亦距1989， 。 新旧﹃中国梦﹄ 、 ， 新疆持 展示 ， 。 并 ; Translation by Yayun Zhu and Annie Luman Ren Contents INTRODUCTION viii . Dream On · JANE GOLLEY, BEN HILLMAN, and LINDA JAIVIN xviii . Acknowledgements xviii . The Cover Image FORUM · ILLUSIONS AND TRANSFORMATIONS: THE MANY MEANINGS OF MENG 夢 5 . From the Land of Illusion to the Paradise of Truth · ANNIE LUMAN REN . 11 Zhuangzi and His Butterfly Dream: The Etymology ofMeng 夢 · JINGJING CHEN CHAPTER 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • International Association of Pride Organizers 2018 Annual Report 2012 Annual Report
    International Association of Pride Organizers 2018 Annual Report 2012 Annual Report InterPride Inc. – International Association of Pride Organizers Founded in 1982, InterPride is the world’s largest organization for organizers of Pride events. InterPride is incorporated in the State of Texas in the USA and is a 501(c)3 tax-exempt organization under US law. It is funded by membership dues, sponsorship, merchandise sales and donations from individuals and organizations. OUR VISION A world where there is full cultural, social and legal equality for all. OUR MISSION Empowering Pride Organizations Worldwide. OUR WORK We promote Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Pride on an international level, to increase networking and communication among Pride Organizations and to encourage diverse communities to hold and attend Pride events and to act as a source of education. InterPride accomplishes it mission with Regional Conferences and an Annual General Meeting and World Conference. At the annual conference, InterPride members network and collaborate on an international scale and take care of the business of the organization. InterPride is a voice for the LGBTQ+ community around the world. We stand up for inequality and fight injustice everywhere. Our members share the latest news about their region with us, so we are able to react internationally and make a difference. Regional Director reports contained within this Annual Report are the words, personal accounts and opinions of the authors involved and do not necessarily reflect the views of InterPride as an organization. InterPride accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of material contained within. InterPride may be contacted via [email protected] or our website: Front cover picture was taken at the first Pride in Barbados.
    [Show full text]
  • Taiwan by Fran A
    Taiwan by Fran A. Martin Encyclopedia Copyright © 2015, glbtq, Inc. Entry Copyright © 2004, glbtq, inc. Reprinted from http://www.glbtq.com Participants in the public The island of Taiwan, lying off the coast of southern China, is today home to a hybrid wedding ceremony at society, incorporating elements of various Chinese, Japanese, and American languages Taiwan Pride in 2006. and popular cultures. The expression of gender and sexuality in contemporary Taiwan mirrors this hybrid society. With the transition from rigid authoritarian social and political control under the Kuomintang government to a nascent pluralist democracy following the lifting of martial law in 1987 has come a range of far- reaching social transformations. One of the most exciting of these is the emergence of a vibrant, politicized, and diverse public queer culture--a culture whose rise since the early 1990s has not, however, been without controversy. The Pre-Modern Period Taiwan has been dominated for several centuries by Han Chinese culture, with Han Chinese inhabitants of the island vastly outnumbering the island's relatively small indigenous population. Little information is available on non-heteroseuxal and non-normative gender cultures in Taiwan in the pre-modern period, since the island was not a major center of the Qing dynasty's intellectual and bureaucratic life and hence relatively few pre-modern written records survive. However, it is clear that the social organization of gender and sexuality in pre-modern Taiwan mirrored that of the Chinese metropolitan culture in at least one way: it lacked any single, coherent category comparable with the modern, Euro-American identity "homosexual." Of course the absence of a coherent homosexual identity does not mean that erotic behaviors between people of the same gender did not occur before the modern period.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBTIQ Community in Taiwan After the Marriage Equality Campaign Reset and Reflect: LGBTIQ Community in Taiwan After the Marriage Equality Campaign
    Reset and reflect: LGBTIQ community in Taiwan after the marriage equality campaign Reset and reflect: LGBTIQ community in Taiwan after the marriage equality campaign This publication is commissioned by ILGA Asia - the Asian Region of the International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association, representing more than 170 LGBTI organizations in East, South, Southeast, and West Asia. The document has been produced in consultation with member organisations and key partners as suggested by member organisations in the country. Permission to quote or otherwise use the information has been provided by the informants. The analysis in the report is intended to recommend ILGA Asia to produce a strategic plan for 2021-2025. Positions in the report lie with the participants of the consultations and interviews, and do not reflect the values and viewpoints of the collective network. Suggested citation: Chen, N.C. (2021). Reset and reflect: LGBTIQ community in Taiwan after the marriage equality campaign. ILGA Asia. Table of contents PAGE 01 PAGE 02 Acknowledgements Excecutive Summary PAGE 05 PAGE 06 Introduction Terminology PAGE 09 PAGE 15 Overview of References SOGIESC Rights Issues in Taiwan 09 Marriage and family issues 11 Trans issues 13 HIV/AIDS issues 14 Intersex issues Taiwan Report Acknowledgements This report is commissioned and conducted by ILGA Asia from November 2020 to January 2021. Publication of this report is made with a series of consultations with ILGA Asia’s member organizations in Taiwan, with the support of the lead consultant Nai-chia Chen. The peer review and editing team included ILGA Asia Executive Director Lieu Ann Vu, Research Officer Henry Koh, Program Officer Khine Su Win, Senior Global Advocacy Officer Ripley Wang and UN Advocacy Intern Meghna Sharma.
    [Show full text]
  • Major LGBT Global Events Updated November 5, 2012
    Atlanta, Ga., U.S.A. Bisbee, Ariz., U.S.A. Brooklyn, N.Y., U.S.A. Chicago, Ill., U.S.A. Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A. Dayton, Ohio, U.S.A. Erie, Pa., U.S.A. Florianopolis, Brazil Guadalajara, Mexico Honolulu, Hawaii, U.S.A. Kansas City, Mo., U.S.A. Lansing, Mich., U.S.A. Long Island, N.Y., U.S.A. Mexico City, Mexico Monterey, Calif., U.S.A. New Hope, Pa., U.S.A. AMERICAS Joining Hearts Atlanta Bisbee Pride Weekend Brooklyn Pride PRIDEChicago Cincinnati Week of Pride Dayton Pride Erie Pride 2013 Parade Florianopolis Pride Guadalajara Gay Pride Honolulu Gay Pride Kansas City Pride Festival Statewide March Long Island Pride Mexico Pride March Swing for Pride Women’s New Hope Celebrates Albany, N.Y., U.S.A. Jul 20 TBD TBD Jun 28 - 30 Jun 29 TBD & Rally TBD TBD Jun 1 TBD Aug 24 Jun 8 TBD Golf Tournament Pride Capital Pride 2013 TBD TBD TBD May 30 - Jun 9 Atlanta, Ga., U.S.A. Bogota, Colombia Buenos Aires, Argentina Chicago, Ill., U.S.A. Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A. Denver, Colo., U.S.A. Fort Collins, Colo., U.S.A. Guadalajara, Mexico Houston, Texas, U.S.A. Key West, Fla., U.S.A. Las Vegas, Nev., U.S.A. Los Angeles, Calif., U.S.A. Miami, Fla., U.S.A. Atlanta Pride Bogota Gay Pride Buenos Aires Pride Northalsted Market Days Cleveland Pride Denver PrideFest 2013 Eugene, Ore., U.S.A. Fort Collins PrideFest 2013 International LGBT Pride Houston Bone Island Weekend Gay Days Las Vegas Primetime White Party Week Monterrey, Mexico New Orleans, La., U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • FAMILIES: UNITED WE STAND IFED 2019, Brazil
    2019 FAMILIES: UNITED WE STAND IFED 2019, Brazil © 2019 The International Family Equality Day (IFED) www.internationalfamilyequalityday.org Table of Contents 5. Editorial 7. Foreword by Victor Madrigal-Borloz 11. Foreword by Valerie Woods 14. Foreword by Coface Europe 16. Country reports 20. Best Practice Institution - City of Buenos Aires, Argentina 22. Best Practice Policy - Paid Parental Leave for Same-Sex Couples 24. Best Practice NGO - LGBT Family Coalition, Canada 27. Best Practice NGO - Swiss Rainbow Families Association, Switzerland 30. The International Family Equality Day (IFED) 32. Promoters of the International Family Equality Day 40. International Family Equality Day - the NGO 42. Cooperating Partners 46. IFED 2020 - Family Diversity in Education 48. Participating Associations 50. Special Country feature 2019: Argentina, Brazil, Croatia, Russia, Taiwan, United Kingdom 68. Overview of Research on Trans Parents 80. Overview of Research on Same-Sex Parent Families 90. Special Thanks Taiwan Pride 2019 2 3 Editorial This year in May IFED has celebrated its first anniversary as an NGO. Board mem- bers and supporters have gathered in the first General Assembly in Wellington (New Zealand) during the ILGA World Conference. An occasion for the activists involved to meet, exchange experiences, learn from and support each other’s. With IFED’s support and coordination, the International Family Equality Day has been celebrated on the first Sunday of May 2019 in 117 towns and 50 countries worldwide. Throughout the year, IFED has networked and advocated for equality for all fam- ilies in important LGBTQ* global events. During the annual ILGA World Conference in March IFED has organized a Workshop about «Intersectional Justice for Global Rainbow Families», spotlight- ing the daily life experiences from rainbow families from Tonga, Pakistan, Fiji, South Africa and Malaysia.
    [Show full text]