DOCSLIB.ORG

Volaris: the Leading Ultra-Low-Cost Airline Serving Mexico, USA and Central America

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Volaris: the Leading Ultra-Low-Cost Airline Serving Mexico, USA and Central America Volaris: the leading ultra-low-cost airline serving Mexico, USA and Central America September 2017 Disclaimer The information ("Confidential Information") contained in this presentation is confidential and is provided by Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.A.B. de C.V., (d/b/a Volaris, the "Company") confidentially to you solely for your reference and may not be retransmitted or distributed to any other persons for any purpose whatsoever. The Confidential Information is subject to change without notice, its accuracy is not guaranteed, it has not been independently verified and it may not contain all material information concerning the Company. Neither the Company, nor any of their respective directors makes any representation or warranty (express or implied) regarding, or assumes any responsibility or liability for, the accuracy or completeness of, or any errors or omissions in, any information or opinions contained herein. None of the Company nor any of their respective directors, officers, employees, stockholders or affiliates nor any other person accepts any liability (in negligence, or otherwise) whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from any use of this presentation or its contents or otherwise arising in connection therewith. No reliance may be placed for any purposes whatsoever on the information set forth in this presentation or on its completeness. This presentation does not constitute or form part of any offer or invitation for sale or subscription of or solicitation or invitation of any offer to buy or subscribe for any securities, nor shall it or any part of it form the basis of or be relied on in connection with any contract or commitment whatsoever. Recipients of this presentation are not to construe the contents of this presentation as legal, tax or investment advice and should consult their own advisers in this regard. This presentation contains statements that constitute forward-looking statements which involve risks and uncertainties. These statements include descriptions regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of the Company or its officers with respect to the consolidated results of operations and financial condition, and future events and plans of the Company. These statements can be recognized by the use of words such as "expects," "plans," "will," "estimates," "projects," or words of similar meaning. Such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results may differ significantly from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors and assumptions. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward looking statements, which are based on the current view of the management of the Company on future events. The Company does not undertake to revise forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances. 2 Volaris: snapshot at 30,000 feet Serving 68 destinations throughout Mexico (40), USA (24) and Central America (4) Jun 17 CAGR 2008 2016 LTM (08-16) Unit cost (CASM ex- 5.5 4.8 4.9 -1.6% fuel; cents, USD)(1) Passenger demand 3.2 14.3 15.3 20.6% (RPMs, bn) Aircraft 21 69 66 16.0% (End of period) Routes 42 162 164 18.4% (End of period) Passengers 3.5 15.0 16.0 20.0% (mm) Operating revenue 4.4 23.5 24.8 23.3% (bn, MXN) Adj. EBITDAR 0.7 8.9 7.5 37.4% (bn. MXN) Adj. ROIC 11% 20% 15% +9 pp. (pre-tax) (1) Converted to USD at an average annual exchange rate Source: Company data 3 Volaris’ flight path for demand stimulation and continued growth Capacity increase Cost reduction More Resilient ULCC ancillaries (“You decide”) business model driving high, profitable growth “Clean”, low base fares More customers 4 Volaris’ consistent execution of its ULCC business model well positioned for growth Accomplishments Opportunities Strong penetration of Mexican air Attractive emerging air travel market in travel market Mexico Diversified and resilient point-to-point Continue geographic diversification network through international growth Bus to air substitution Continue route frequency increase Successful price unbundling Upside in ancillary revenue Flexible fleet plan and utilization; Proven ancillary revenue model capacity management Sustained profitability with strong Continue cost reductions balance sheet 5 Accomplishments Volaris has a best-in-class unit cost structure Long-term unit cost advantage CASM and CASM ex-fuel (LTM June 2017, USD cents) (1) Cost structure • Economies of scale In line with best-in- - Dilute fixed costs class ULCCs - High seat density 13.3 13.2 13.1 12.5 • Young and fuel efficient fleet 2.9 11.5 2.5 3.5 11.0 - Sharklet rollout 10.3 3.7 9.8 - Average age of 4.4 years 2.5 2.7 8.9 2.2 8.7 - NEO Engines rollout 2.7 7.4 7.6 - Low fuel burn 7.1 2.4 2.4 6.4 6.4 1.8 1.9 5.9 5.9 • Productive network 2.0 1.9 2.4 1.2 10.6 - Point-to-point 10.4 9.8 1.7 8.8 8.9 8.3 8.1 - No connections complexity 7.2 6.5 6.3 5.6 5.7 5.0 4.6 • High aircraft utilization 4.5 4.0 4.2 - 2Q17 average 12.8 block hours per day Latin American carriers US LCCs WW LCCs US network Continued cost carriers improvement potential (1) DCOMPS = Direct Competitors: Delta, American Airlines, Alaska Airlines and United | (Average CASM and CASM ex-fuel) (2) As of March 2017 Note: Non-USD data converted to USD using an end of period exchange rate for the period 7 Source: Company data, airlines public information Volaris’ cost structure enables us to lower base fares and increase ancillaries Volaris’ TRASM is below most competitors’ CASM TRASM and CASM (LTM June 2017 USD cents) 13.1 13.2 13.3 12.5 11.5 11.0 10.3 9.8 8.7 8.9 7.6 7.2 7.4 6.4 6.4 5.9 5.9 (1) DCOMPS = Direct Competitors: Delta, American Airlines, Alaska Airlines and United | (Average CASM and CASM ex-fuel) Note: Non-USD data converted to USD using an end of period exchange rate for the period 8 Source: Company data, airlines public information Non-ticket revenues continue to grow, with upside potential Non-ticket revenue per passenger Volaris (MXN) per passenger Ancillaries • Apply revenue management techniques 2011-2016 CAGR: + 21,9% - Pricing by route, season, day 407 381 - Fully dynamic pricing for some products 338 279 • Add products 204 211 - New products & services 142 - Enhancements to existing products • Improve presence - More touch-points to sell ancillaries throughout 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 1H 2017 the journey - Allow customization Best-in class ULCCs, including first bag fee (1) • Benefit from network diversification (Jun 2017 LTM, as % of total operating revenue) (2) - More international capacity 45% 48% 41% • First checked bag - USA and Puerto Rico 25% - Costa Rican AOC Increasing non-ticket revenue allows to Volaris Allegiant Wizz Spirit Non-ticket reduce fare further and stimulate revenue per $20.43 $54.91 $29.20 $41.94 demand pax (USD) (1) Mexican legislation does not allow Mexican airlines to charge for the first checked bag on domestic flights (2) Converted to USD using an average exchange rate for the period 9 Source: Company data, airlines public information Network enhancement: connecting the dots and diversifying further LTM July 2017 Volaris diversified its network by starting operations in 16 routes and 5 stations Volaris’ LTM July 2017 new routes New routes Domestic International Guadalajara 3 2 Mexico City - 4 Costa Rica - 3 Other - 4 Total 3 13 New stations USA Central America Austin San Salvador Miami Managua Milwaukee New International New Domestic New Volaris Costa Rica 10 Note: Excludes routes and stations announced to start operations …supporting strong capacity growth 1H 2017 capacity growth contribution (yoy) + Additional frequencies 10.3% + Joining existing airports 1.7% + New airports 3.4% + Volaris Costa Rica 1.0% = Total ASM growth 16.4% Our network is well positioned for diversified growth 11 Source: Company data Growth opportunities In recent years, Mexico’s volume growth has been robust despite challenging economic environment Mexico passenger market volume has increased since 2011 Passenger volume (millions) Main industry 2011 - 2016 CAGR: +8.6% 87 growth drivers 82 75 14 • Strong demand and 66 13 61 12 increasing middle 57 11 class 52 10 29 9 27 8 26 • LCC gaining market 21 23 through low fares 19 19 -43.8% LCC (1) 37 42 44 share 25 28 30 33 • High improvement potential: 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 LTM Jun -Domestic air 2017 Domestic USA Other international trips per capita in Mexico 0.42 Yoy growth 4.0% 8.3% 8.3% 8.3% 12.3% 10.4% 10.6%(3) vs. Brazil 0.49 GDP growth (2) 4.0% 4.0% 1.4% 2.3% 2.6% 2.3% 3.1% GDP multiplier 1.0 2.1 6.1 3.7 4.7 4.5 3.4 3.6x GDP multiplier (1) Considers Volaris and VivaAerobus domestic market share 1H 2017 (2) Values according to INEGI´s new methodology in recent years (3) Yoy growth for LTM June 2016 vs. LTM June 2017 13 Source: DGAC-SCT; INEGI; Banco de México Volaris growth has surpassed market growth in both domestic and international markets Domestic passenger growth (%) 25.2% 24.8% 23.0% 19.7% 13.0% 12.8% 12.0% 10.3% 11.5% 8.6% 7.9% 7.7% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 LTM June 2017 Market Volaris International passenger growth (%) 33.3% 26.9% 23.4% 21.8% 19.6% 14.6% 11.6% 10.3% 8.8% 6.5% 8.1% 8.0% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 LTM June 2017 Market Volaris 14 Source: DGAC, Company data Volaris has been the engine of growth for VFR and leisure markets in Mexico Segment passenger CAGR Volaris vs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • China Southern Airlines' Sky Pearl Club
    SKY PEARL CLUB MEMBERSHIP GUIDE Welcome to China Southern Airlines’ Sky Pearl Club The Sky Pearl Club is the frequent flyer program of China Southern Airlines. From the moment you join The Sky Pearl Club, you will experience a whole new world of exciting new travel opportunities with China Southern! Whether you’re traveling for business or pleasure, you’ll be earning mileage toward your award goals every time you fly. Many Elite tier services have been prepared for you. We trust this Guide will soon help you reach your award flight to your dream destinations. China Southern Sky Pearl Club cares about you! 1 A B Earning Sky Pearl Mileage Redeeming Sky Pearl Mileage Airlines China Southern Award Ticket and Award Upgrade Hotels SkyTeam Award Ticket and Award Upgrade Banks Telecommunications, Car Rentals, Business Travel ， Dining and others C D Getting Acquainted with Sky Pearl Rules Enjoying Sky Pearl Elite Benefits Definition Membership tiers Membership Qualification and Mileage Account Elite Qualification Mileage Accrual Elite Benefits Mileage Redemption Membership tier and Elite benefits Others 2 A Earning Sky Pearl Mileage As the newest member of the worldwide SkyTeam alliance, whether it’s in the air or on the ground, The Sky Pearl Club gives you more opportunities than ever before to earn Award travel. When flying with China Southern or one of our many airline partners, you can earn FFP mileage. But, that’s not the only way! Hotels stays, car rentals, credit card services, telecommunication services or dining with our business-to-business partners can also help you earn mileage.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Cargo, Special Solutions Transportation of Special Cargo Is One of Korean Air's Expertise
    special cargo, special solutions Transportation of special cargo is one of Korean Air's expertise We are particularly proud of our high standards and quality services in transporting special shipments. Since inception in 1969, Korean Air Cargo has handled nearly every commodity imaginable - from fresh tulips to dolphins, from tiny electronic chips to gigantic oil drilling equipment. Variation is well designed to offer new solutions for you, utilizing our long accumulated knowledge and confidence in specialized cargo handling. A range of eleven Variation products specifically meet the needs of each type of goods, guaranteeing quality service at all times Variation-ART is designed for handling precious works of art, focusing on protection from humidity, shock and water damage. Variation-BIG is designed to accommodate extremely oversized or heavy pieces that require freighter aircraft. Variation-DGR is a specialty product for the dangerous goods shipment, designed under strict compliance with IATA standards and regulations. Variation-FASHION is dedicated to the shipment of garment on hangers and provides special sealed containers for quick delivery. Variation-FRESH is designed to meet the needs of shippers handling temperature- sensitive cargo: FRESH 1, 2, 3. Variation-LIVE is designed to ensure the safety and health of live animals. Variation-SAFE is designed for handling cargo of high value: SAFE 1, 2. Variation-WHEELS is designed for motorized vehicles ranging from motorcycles to automobiles. Variation-ART provides specialized logistical service to transport artwork in optimum conservation and security conditions ● Handled with special care during ground transportation at each airport to ensure minimum impact. ● Customers can be allowed to watch entire ground handling processes.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2019(Opens in New Window)
    Monthly Statistical Report To: Thomas Bartlett, Interim Aviation Director From: Brian Pratte, Chief Air Service Development Officer Copies: San Antonio Regional Stakeholders Subject: December 2019 Monthly Statistics Date: January 28, 2020 AIRPORT ACHIEVES RECORD PASSENGERS IN 2019 SUMMARY San Antonio International Airport (SAT) continued its impressive upward trajectory with another year of record passengers in 2019. A total 10,363,040 passengers flew through SAT during the year, exceeding 2018 levels by nearly 320,000 or 3.2%. For the year, domestic traffic increased 2.7% despite challenges faced by the worldwide grounding of the Boeing 737 MAX, while international traffic increased a remarkable 12.6% with all international carriers reporting double- digit growth. In 2019, SAT welcomed Sun Country Airlines with service to Las Vegas, Minneapolis and Portland, OR as well as new nonstop service to New York-JFK by American Airlines. Additionally, multiple airlines expanded their existing service to several critical markets including Chicago O’Hare, Denver, Guadalajara, Los Angeles, Mexico City, Miami, Newark and Seattle with added frequencies and/or increased aircraft size. In December 2019, the airport recorded 888,086 total passengers, the highest of any December on record and a 1.4% increase compared to the same month last year. Domestic traffic rose slightly by 0.8% while international traffic increased 13.8%, driven, in part, by capacity increases by all the airport’s Mexican carriers for the busy holiday travel season. In regards to air cargo, 277,579,134 pounds moved through SAT in 2019, representing an increase of nearly 2% and approaching YTD levels not experienced since the pre-recession peak in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Paul Stephen Dempsey
    AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2008 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Before Alliances, there was Pan American World Airways . and Trans World Airlines. Before the mega- Alliances, there was interlining, facilitated by IATA Like dogs marking territory, airlines around the world are sniffing each other's tail fins looking for partners." Daniel Riordan “The hardest thing in working on an alliance is to coordinate the activities of people who have different instincts and a different language, and maybe worship slightly different travel gods, to get them to work together in a culture that allows them to respect each other’s habits and convictions, and yet work productively together in an environment in which you can’t specify everything in advance.” Michael E. Levine “Beware a pact with the devil.” Martin Shugrue Airline Motivations For Alliances • the desire to achieve greater economies of scale, scope, and density; • the desire to reduce costs by consolidating redundant operations; • the need to improve revenue by reducing the level of competition wherever possible as markets are liberalized; and • the desire to skirt around the nationality rules which prohibit multinational ownership and cabotage. Intercarrier Agreements · Ticketing-and-Baggage Agreements · Joint-Fare Agreements · Reciprocal Airport Agreements · Blocked Space Relationships · Computer Reservations Systems Joint Ventures · Joint Sales Offices and Telephone Centers · E-Commerce Joint Ventures · Frequent Flyer Program Alliances · Pooling Traffic & Revenue · Code-Sharing Code Sharing The term "code" refers to the identifier used in flight schedule, generally the 2-character IATA carrier designator code and flight number. Thus, XX123, flight 123 operated by the airline XX, might also be sold by airline YY as YY456 and by ZZ as ZZ9876.
    [Show full text]
  • THE IMPACT of RESTRUCTURING on the AIRLINE PERFORMANCE: the Case of Garuda Indonesia
    Výskumné štúdie THE IMPACT OF RESTRUCTURING ON THE AIRLINE PERFORMANCE: The Case of Garuda Indonesia Roberto AKYUWEN ABSTRACT: Garuda Indonesia is an airline company owned by the Indonesian Government. The airline has been vastly deve- Dr. Roberto Akyuwen loped since being established in 1950. Remarkable growth has been achieved mainly due to the fact that in the Senior Lecturer early years there was minimal competition in the airline industry in Indonesia. Being the fi rst Indonesian airline, Finance Education and Training Center Yogyakarta Garuda Indonesia monopolised the commercial air transportation services. This situation allowed more than Ministry of Finance Republic Indonesia reasonable company performance for many years. However, since the government introduction of an open do- Jl. Solo Km 11 Kalasan, Sleman, Yogyakarta 55571 INDONESIA mestic airline industry in 1990, Garuda Indonesia started to face diffi culties. Garuda competed against a number Telp. 62-274-496219, Facs. 62-274-497235 of private airlines, which possessed expansive strategies in developing routes as well as increasing the number [email protected], [email protected] of aircraft. The performance of Garuda Indonesia gradually decreased to a low when operational profi t and cash fl ow reached negative fi gures during the period 1993 to 1997. Further, the seat load factor and on time perfor- Roberto Akyuwen was born in Ambon, Indonesia on 19 March, 1970. He obtained his doctorate degree with cum mance were also worsening. To overcome these problems, restructuring was fi rst undertaken during 1998 to laude in 2003 from the Doctorate Program in Economics, Gadjah Mada University Yogyakarta. Currently, he has 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Alliances
    AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2011 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Open Skies • 1992 - the United States concluded the first second generation “open skies” agreement with the Netherlands. It allowed KLM and any other Dutch carrier to fly to any point in the United States, and allowed U.S. carriers to fly to any point in the Netherlands, a country about the size of West Virginia. The U.S. was ideologically wedded to open markets, so the imbalance in traffic rights was of no concern. Moreover, opening up the Netherlands would allow KLM to drain traffic from surrounding airline networks, which would eventually encourage the surrounding airlines to ask their governments to sign “open skies” bilateral with the United States. • 1993 - the U.S. conferred antitrust immunity on the Wings Alliance between Northwest Airlines and KLM. The encirclement policy began to corrode resistance to liberalization as the sixth freedom traffic drain began to grow; soon Lufthansa, then Air France, were asking their governments to sign liberal bilaterals. • 1996 - Germany fell, followed by the Czech Republic, Italy, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Malta, Poland. • 2001- the United States had concluded bilateral open skies agreements with 52 nations and concluded its first multilateral open skies agreement with Brunei, Chile, New Zealand and Singapore. • 2002 – France fell. • 2007 - The U.S. and E.U. concluded a multilateral “open skies” traffic agreement that liberalized everything but foreign ownership and cabotage. • 2011 – cumulatively, the U.S. had signed “open skies” bilaterals with more than100 States. Multilateral and Bilateral Air Transport Agreements • Section 5 of the Transit Agreement, and Section 6 of the Transport Agreement, provide: “Each contracting State reserves the right to withhold or revoke a certificate or permit to an air transport enterprise of another State in any case where it is not satisfied that substantial ownership and effective control are vested in nationals of a contracting State .
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Aviation Fuel Leadership
    FACT SHEET #7 / AUGUST 2020 SUSTAINABLE AVIATION FUEL LEADERSHIP As the aviation sector moves towards an energy transition towards sustainable aviation fuel, some airlines are showing particular leadership in the move. Leading edge Recognising leadership in the promotion of sustainable aviation fuel through significant, multi-million dollar forward-purchase agreements with suppliers and/or investments in SAF supply. Pioneers Investment and significant start-up support for sustainable aviation fuel deployment projects with long-term benefits for the industry, these airlines are providing important first steps for more ambitious action. Current airports with regular sustainable aviation fuel supply Airlines purchasing SAF which is distributed through the regular airport hydrant system. Bergen San Francisco Oslo Los Angeles Stockholm enviro.aero FACT SHEET #7 / PAGE 2 Explorers Have helped with the promotion of SAF through test flights and initial involvement with SAF trials, research and investigation of local opportunities. The full list of flights can be found onwww.enviro.aero/SAF Carrier Date of first SAF flight Details Air New Zealand December 2008 Technical test flight on a Boeing 747 Interjet July 2011 Commercial flight on an Airbus A320 between Mexico City and Tuxtla Gutierrez AeroMexico August 2011 Commercial flight on a Boeing 777 between Mexico City and Madrid Iberia October 2011 Commercial flight on an Airbus A320 between Madrid and Barcelona Thomson Airways October 2011 Commercial flight between Birmingham and Arrecife on a
    [Show full text]
  • The Leading Ultra-Low-Cost Airline Serving Mexico and the US
    The Leading Ultra-Low-Cost Airline Serving Mexico and the US March 2015 Disclaimer The information ("Confidential Information") contained in this presentation is confidential and is provided by Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.A.B. de C.V., (d/b/a Volaris, the "Company") confidentially to you solely for your reference and may not be retransmitted or distributed to any other persons for any purpose whatsoever. The Confidential Information is subject to change without notice, its accuracy is not guaranteed, it has not been independently verified and it may not contain all material information concerning the Company. The Company, nor any of their respective directors makes any representation or warranty (express or implied) regarding, or assumes any responsibility or liability for, the accuracy or completeness of, or any errors or omissions in, any information or opinions contained herein. None of the Company or any of their respective directors, officers, employees, stockholders or affiliates nor any other person accepts any liability (in negligence, or otherwise) whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from any use of this presentation or its contents or otherwise arising in connection therewith. No reliance may be placed for any purposes whatsoever on the information set forth in this presentation or on its completeness. This presentation does not constitute or form part of any offer or invitation for sale or subscription of or solicitation or invitation of any offer to buy or subscribe for any securities, nor shall it or any part of it form the basis of or be relied on in connection with any contract or commitment whatsoever.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Datalex Big Book of Airline Data Page 0
    2020 Datalex Big Book of Airline Data Page 0 2020 Datalex Big Book of Airline Data by IdeaWorksCompany Table of Contents Updates to the 2020 Datalex Big Book of Airline Data ................................................................... 3 A. Welcome Message from Datalex ................................................................................................... 5 B. Introduction to the Data ................................................................................................................. 6 C. Airline Traffic for the 2019 Period ................................................................................................ 9 Primary Airlines in Alphabetical Order ............................................................................................ 9 Subsidiary Airlines in Alphabetical Order ...................................................................................... 16 Primary Airlines by Traffic ................................................................................................................. 19 Primary Airlines Traffic by World Region ..................................................................................... 26 Traffic Generated by Global Alliances ............................................................................................ 35 Traffic by Airline Category ................................................................................................................ 37 D. Airline Revenue for the 2019 Period .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Late Night Noise Limitation Q1 2021 Results
    Total Airline Operations and Exceedances During Late Night Hours in 1st Quarter 2021 PAX = passenger airline CRG = cargo airline Airline Code Airline Name Type* Total Operations otal Number of Exceedanc Percent of Operations AAL American Airlines PAX 179 0 0% AAR Asiana Cargo CRG 6 5 83% ABX ABX Air CRG 14 2 14% ASA Alaska Airlines PAX 267 0 0% ATN Air Transport Intl' (Prime Air) CRG 420 40 10% BOV Boliviana PAX 1 1 100% CAL China Airlines Cargo CRG 47 34 72% CKK China Cargo Airlines CRG 70 34 42% CKS Kalitta Air CRG 13 9 69% CLX Cargolux CRG 27 22 81% DAL Delta Air Lines PAX 123 1 1% EVA EVA Air PAX 73 23 32% FDX FedEx Express CRG 105 71 68% FFT Frontier PAX 3 0 0% GTI Atlas Air CRG 4 4 100% HAL Hawaiian Airlines PAX 18 1 6% JBU JetBlue PAX 15 0 0% KAL Korean Air Cargo CRG 23 8 35% NCR National Air Cargo CRG 1 0 0% OAE Omni Air PAX 4 0 0% QXE Horizon Airlines PAX 39 0 0% SCX Sun Country PAX 1 0 0% SKW SkyWest Airlines PAX 12 0 0% SWA Southwest Airlines PAX 15 0 0% UAL United Airlines PAX 2 0 0% Totals 1482 255 17% Airlines With No Operations During Late Night Hours: Lufthansa, Japan Airlines, All Nippon Airlines, Emirates Airlines, Air Canada, British Airways Jazz Aviation, Iceland Air, Aeromexico, Volaris, Spirit Airlines, Qatar Airways Aircraft Departures Exceeding 91 dB SEL at Noise Monitor 12 Noise Monitor Date/Time Airline Flight Number Aircraft Type SEL Noise Level SEA12 01/19/2021 00:33 Cargolux CLX46U B744 94.364 SEA12 01/19/2021 00:57 EVA Air EVA025 B77W 91.02 SEA12 01/22/2021 00:40 EVA Air EVA025 B77W 91.304 SEA12 01/23/2021
    [Show full text]
  • List of Government-Owned and Privatized Airlines (Unofficial Preliminary Compilation)
    List of Government-owned and Privatized Airlines (unofficial preliminary compilation) Governmental Governmental Governmental Total Governmental Ceased shares shares shares Area Country/Region Airline governmental Governmental shareholders Formed shares operations decreased decreased increased shares decreased (=0) (below 50%) (=/above 50%) or added AF Angola Angola Air Charter 100.00% 100% TAAG Angola Airlines 1987 AF Angola Sonair 100.00% 100% Sonangol State Corporation 1998 AF Angola TAAG Angola Airlines 100.00% 100% Government 1938 AF Botswana Air Botswana 100.00% 100% Government 1969 AF Burkina Faso Air Burkina 10.00% 10% Government 1967 2001 AF Burundi Air Burundi 100.00% 100% Government 1971 AF Cameroon Cameroon Airlines 96.43% 96.4% Government 1971 AF Cape Verde TACV Cabo Verde 100.00% 100% Government 1958 AF Chad Air Tchad 98.00% 98% Government 1966 2002 AF Chad Toumai Air Tchad 25.00% 25% Government 2004 AF Comoros Air Comores 100.00% 100% Government 1975 1998 AF Comoros Air Comores International 60.00% 60% Government 2004 AF Congo Lina Congo 66.00% 66% Government 1965 1999 AF Congo, Democratic Republic Air Zaire 80.00% 80% Government 1961 1995 AF Cofôte d'Ivoire Air Afrique 70.40% 70.4% 11 States (Cote d'Ivoire, Togo, Benin, Mali, Niger, 1961 2002 1994 Mauritania, Senegal, Central African Republic, Burkino Faso, Chad and Congo) AF Côte d'Ivoire Air Ivoire 23.60% 23.6% Government 1960 2001 2000 AF Djibouti Air Djibouti 62.50% 62.5% Government 1971 1991 AF Eritrea Eritrean Airlines 100.00% 100% Government 1991 AF Ethiopia Ethiopian
    [Show full text]
  • CPP Carrier Name Code-Share Carrier Name Code-Share
    CPP Carrier Code-share Carrier Code-share DOD U.S. or Name Name Carrier Approval Foreign Airline Code Status Alaska Airlines Horizon Air QX Approved U.S. Alaska Airlines Peninsula Airways (dba) KS Approved U.S. PenAir Alaska Airlines Ravn Alaska 7H Approved U.S. Alaska Airlines Sky West Airlines OO Approved U.S. American Air Wisconsin ZW Approved U.S. Airlines American British Airways BA Approved Foreign Airlines American Cathay Pacific Airlines CX Approved Foreign Airlines American China Southern Airlines CZ Approved Foreign Airlines American Compass Airlines CP Approved U.S. Airlines American Envoy Air Inc. MQ Approved U.S. Airlines American Express Jet EV Approved U.S. Airlines American Fiji Airways FJ Approved Foreign Airlines American Finnair AY Approved Foreign Airlines American Iberia IB Approved Foreign Airlines American JAL Airlines JL Approved Foreign Airlines American Jetstar Japan Co. GK Approved Foreign Airlines American Malaysia Airlines MH Approved Foreign Airlines American Mesa Airlines YV Approved U.S. Airlines American Piedmont PT Approved U.S. Airlines American PSA OH Approved U.S. Airlines American Qantas QF Approved Foreign Airlines American Republic Airways YX Approved U.S. Airlines American Royal Jordanian RJ Approved Foreign Airlines American Sky West OO Approved U.S. Airlines American Trans States AX Approved U.S. Airlines Delta Airlines Aeroflot SU Approved Foreign Delta Airlines Aerolineas Argentinas AR Approved Foreign Delta Airlines Aeromexico AM Approved Foreign Delta Airlines Aeromexico Connect 5D Approved Foreign Delta Airlines Air Europa UX Approved Foreign Delta Airlines Air France AF Approved Foreign Delta Airlines Air One Cityliner (Alitalia) CT Approved Foreign Delta Airlines Alaska Airlines AS Approved U.S.
    [Show full text]