DOCSLIB.ORG

2010 White & Case International Rounds Participant Records

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2010 White & Case International Rounds Participant Records 2010 Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition 2010 White & Case International Rounds Participant Records Afghanistan Baltic Region Kabul University – Team #658 European Humanities University – Team #342 Mohammad Jawed Massoud Inesa Stolper Shamshad Pasarlay Margarita Zhesko Spozhmai Salma Stanakzai Ekaterina Murashko Omar Sadr Sergey Haritonov Yalda Afif Maksim Lashuk Afghanistan Barbados Albiruni University – Team #687 University of the West Indies – Team #456 Parwiz Esmati Kenyatta Powell Ahmad Zubair Sohail Maurice Smith Bakhtiar Talash Renee Joseph Noman Mahdi Kyle Kentish Ahmad Danish Noha Belarus Argentina Belarusian State University – Team #429 Universidad de Buenos Aires – Team #491 Maryia Khaladzinskaya Lucas Ramón Mendos Aliaksandr Basalyha Nahuel Maisley Andrei Solin Maria Florencia Furbatto Tatsiana Borys Erica Geringer Maria Victoria Gama Belgium Universiteit Gent – Team #665 Armenia Bernard Dubois Russian-Armenian (Slavonic) University – Team Kristof Caluwaert #743 Tijl De Jaeger Avtandil Avetisyan Freekje De Vidts Aram Vardevanyan Hans Plancke Samvel Yuzbashyan Dzhon Ayrapetyan Bosnia and Herzegovina Syuzanna Shamakhyan University of Sarajevo – Team #432 Zlatan Balta Australia Irma Hodzic University of Western Australia – Team #359 Nedim Kulenovic Nicholas Monks Andrew Hanna Brazil Jessie Smith Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais – Team #578 Luke Villiers Daniel Barbosa Alice Drury Pietro Grassi Diana Lott Australia Ana Oliveira Australian National University – Team #448 Priscila Galvão Ellen Chapple Rohan Kapur Bulgaria Sarah Lynch Sofia University – Team #157 Sneha Rangnath Dimitar Delchev Samuel Thorpe Stanka Cherkezova Violeta Tsolova Ina Vasileva Uchkunova Valeri Petkov International Law Students Association 2010 Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition Cambodia China Royal University of Law and Economics – Team Beijing Foreign Studies University – Team #223 #291 Xiao Ma Tepikanika Tan Boyue Liu Tith Maria Theng Jinlin Wang Keattech Tan Fei Xiao Vanchhay Pea Chunbei Li Canada China McGill University – Team #268 Shenzhen University – Team #251 Alexandra Dodger Longbo Wang Mary Race Hao Shen Kabir Jamal Di Na Zhan Bryana Jensen Ya Ju Yao Ai jing Chen Canada York University Osgoode Hall – Team #307 China Larissa Moscu University of International Business & Economics – Adrian Fran Team #395 Ren Bucholz Fei Chen Kosta Kalogiros Zhen yu Xie Mo mo Ren Canada Zongguo Ying University of Ottawa Faculty of Law–Civil Law Section – Team #418 China Catherine Blanchard China University of Political Science & Law – Team Pierre-Alexandre Cardinal #510 Francis Legault-Mayrand Bo Li Florence Sauvé-Lafrance Tianying Song Xiaoyan Teng Chile Ye Liu Universidad de los Andes – Team #317 Patricio Laporta Chinese Taipei Nicolas Ocampo Soochow University – Team #628 Catalina Gonzalez Yun-Sheng Wang Albert Harsch Yi-En Lee Lung-Cheng Liu China Jennifer Li Xiamen University – Team #135 Chen-Wei Peng Qianyi Ouyang Qianwen Zhang Colombia Bowen Li Universidad de Los Andes – Team #146 Jie Zhan Andrés Esteban Zhiheng Qiang Pablo Carrizosa Maria Prada China Ana Durán Renmin University – Team #151 Xiaoyang Nie Colombia Duo Li Pontificia Universidad Javeriana – Team #195 Yi Yuan Cristina Copete Weifeng Zhang María Cristina Martínez Yuxiang Hu Verónica Restrepo Diana Dajer International Law Students Association 2010 Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition Costa Rica Ethiopia Universidad de Costa Rica – Team #358 Haramaya University – Team #563 Rudy Sorto Fikadu Shibeshi Felipe Echandi Wudassie Asfaw Diego Gallegos Mahlet Yidnekachew Alejandro Piercy Fasika Kuma Valeria Tiffer France Cyprus Université Panthéon-Sorbonne Paris 1 – Team #553 University of Cyprus – Team #637 Philippe Johnston Menelaos Karabetsos Emanuel Castellarin Katerina Papageorgiou Beatriz Teixeira Stevens Kyriaki Sophokleous Elodie Tournier Athina Christofi Anne Coulon Agathi Trakkidi France Czech Republic Universite Pantheon-Assas Paris 2 – Team #620 Masaryk University – Team #332 Rachel Clark Monika Hlavkova Diane Girard Katerina Holubova Fabienne Costadau Jan Seidel Hervé Hansen Josef Ostransky Grahame Anderson Lenka Popovicova Georgia Denmark Tbilisi State University – Team #131 University of Copenhagen – Team #408 Levan Asatiani Malte Normann Lyshoej David Khachvani Miriam Alide McKenna David Jaiani Camilla Brinch Rasmussen Tamar Morchiladze Robert Thomas Andersen Germany Dominican Republic Universität Heidelberg – Team #249 Pontificia Universidad Católica Madre y Maestra – Anna Verena Lechermann Team #566 Christopher Carsten Clerihew Emma Lucila Sanz Jenny Laube Erick Albert Stern Comas Michael Johannes Heuser María Ligia Rivas Tatjana Chionos Dominican Republic Germany Universidad Autónoma de Santo Domingo – Team Georg-August Universität – Team #310 #742 Morten Jonas Carmen Rafaelina Roa Gerónimo Lars Borchardt Melvyn Marcos Domínguez Reyes Elena-Josephine Woltaire Sarah Estefany Roa Ramírez Carolin Kluepfel Ariel Evangelista Pérez Estévez Neels Lamschus Ethiopia Germany Bahir Dar University – Team #559 Friedrich Schiller Universität – Team #344 Kenean Assefa Mersha Anne Wetzel Tinsae Asgedom Abay Anna Louise Schellschmidt Eden Taddese Gila Henrik Benjamin Pegel Fabian Reischauer Elise Madeleine Kleinsorgen International Law Students Association 2010 Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition Ghana Hong Kong, China Ghana School of Law – Team #548 City University of Hong Kong – Team #397 Iris Kwegyirba Aggrey-Orleans Ka Hang Louie Chan Augustine Beliksuun Augus Kidisil Man Hei Hui Theodore Nsoe Adimazoya Michelle Chen Zhaoxu Eric Yaw Ansah Lai Yee Winnie Wat Natasha Odarkai Lamptey Tin Lok Chan Greece Hungary Aristotle University of Thessaloniki – Team #381 Eötvös Loránd University – Team #570 Konstantinos Voulgarakis Márta Juhász Georgios Fasfalis Zsófia Deli Zena Prodromou Dávid Pusztai Elli Resvani Bence Spiczmüller Bence Aphrodite Giovanopoulou Renáta Suparmadi Guatemala Iceland Universidad Rafael Landívar – Team #144 University of Iceland – Team #372 Rodrigo de Ojeda Jens Fjalar Skaptason Ana Lucia Chacon Granados Inga Þórey Óskarsdóttir Carlos Arturo Villagran Sandoval Ingunn Anna Hjaltadóttir Francisco Javier Valencia Ásta Sóley Sigurðardóttir Fernando Alonso Marin Ingunn Hilmarsdóttir Guatemala India Universidad Francisco Marroquín – Team #411 National Law University, Jodhpur – Team #250 Jorge Gabriel Jimenez Aman Andres Goicolea Mena Manu Sanan Natalia Callejas Aquino Ambika Gupta Maria Fernanda Barillas Reyna Sannoy Das Arpita Sarkar Guyana University of Guyana – Team #550 India Stephen Roberts Law Center I, University of Delhi – Team #348 Suzanne Bullen Rajbir Singh Jarienn James Danish Chowdhury Dexter Todd Bhumika Menon Adrian Smith Subhiksh Vasudev Gurdeep Kaur Hong Kong, China University of Hong Kong – Team #123 India David Chi-Wai Cheung National Law School of India University, Bangalore Yvonne Yee-Yen Ngai – Team #438 Leticia Ho-Ling Tang Niranjan V Eric Yat-Chung Tsoi Gautam Bhatia Linda On-Ting Chan Raag Yadava Mihir Naniwadekar Hong Kong, China Subhang Nair Chinese University of Hong Kong – Team #666 Roger Phang India Vinca Yau National Academy for Legal Studies and Research, Cora Ang Hyderabad – Team #631 Patrick Siu Shatadru Chakraborty Peter Hsiao Pen Chang Dhananjaya Mishra Ashish Pareek Brajendu Bhaskar International Law Students Association 2010 Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition Indonesia Jamaica Universitas Pelita Harapan – Team #371 Norman Manley Law School – Team #446 Mohammad Irham Kerry-Ann Heavens Johan Kurnia Marc Ramsay Dirga Putra Kantawibawa Rene Gayle Wynne Prasetyo Alecia Johns Malene Alleyne Indonesia Universitas Indonesia – Team #421 Japan Adeline Wijayanti Waseda University – Team #126 Muhammad Syafruddin Yuto Komori Tracy Tania Motoharu Fujimori Wincen Santoso Kentaro Karasawa Kaito Taguchi Iraq Yuki Yasuda Basrah University – Team #746 Arshed Al-Abboodi Kenya Maysam Al-Tamimi University of Nairobi – Team #733 Noor Saleih David Kalii Gabriel Mwangi Iraq Nixon Korir University of Sulaimaniya – Team #747 Stella Kinyua Shilan Raof Latif Melissa Njoroge Rozhgar Ahmed Mahmood Kameran Ahmed Aziz Kuwait Khalil Abdulkader Husain Kuwait University – Team #537 Dalal Al Hasan Ireland Anwar Al Ammar The Law Society of Ireland – Team #679 Raghad Boodi Philip Tully Shadi Al Sayrafi William Claffey Aine Bhreathnach Lesotho Darach Connolly National University of Lesotho – Team #761 Rose Alice Murphy M. M. Manyokole S. S. Tsabeha Israel S. M. Makhabane Hebrew University of Jerusalem – Team #143 L. Kehtsi Netta Corren M. Mohapi Menachem Danishefsky Lital Casper Lithuania Ran Shacham Vytautas Magnus University – Team #325 Adi Shemtov Giedre Kazlauskaite Giedre Tomkeviciute Italy Karolis Vinciunas Università di Torino – Team #673 Ruta Sutkute Annalisa Falconi Kristina Apanaviciute Elena Corcione Riccardo Maggi Lithuania Alberto Bava Mykolas Romeris University – Team #564 Agne Cepinskyte Inga Zalyte Vilija Velyvyte Indre Petkeviciute Greta Krulyte International Law Students Association 2010 Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition Malaysia Netherlands Universiti Teknologi MARA – Team #723 Universiteit van Amsterdam – Team #529 Faez Abdul Razak Nina Abramishvili Afif Ahmayuddin Ailbhe Finn Mohd Azinuddin Abdul Karim Mariia Bezdieniezhna Hazralika Hamzah Avril Rushe Hilwa Nazifa Bustam New Zealand Mexico Auckland University – Team #722 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México – Team Desley Horton #447 Ben Prewett Karla Jones Edward Fox
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Public Defender of Georgia
    200 6 The Public Defender of Georgia Report of the Public Defender of Georgia 1 Human Rights in Georgia Report of the Public Defender of Georgia 2006Second half of TBILISI 2007 THE REPORT WAS PUBLISHED WITH THE FINANCIAL SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT OF NORWAY AND UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (UNDP) Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 9 2. THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL 11 3. THE PROSECUTORS OFFICE 24 4. THE MINISTRY OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS 41 5. FISCAL POLICE 55 6. HUMAN RIGHTS IN ARMED FORCES 57 7. ALTERNATIVE LABOUR SERVICE 60 8. ALTERNATIVE LABOUR SERVICE IN THE RESERVE 64 9. HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE PENITENTIARY SYSTEM 65 10. DEATH RATE WITHIN THE PENITENTIARY SYSTEM AND CAUSATIVE FACTORS 82 11. ENFORCEMENT OF COURT JUDGEMENTS 87 12. ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGEMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS 94 13. INFRINGEMENT OF THE RIGHT OF OWNERSHIP 97 14. PROTECTION OF THE ELDERLY, AND PENSIONS 118 15. REPORT ON THE VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE CONFLICT ZONES 130 16. INCIDENTS OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN ABKHAZIA 132 17. INSTANCES OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION IN TSKHINVALI REGION 142 18. SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONDITIONS OF THE INTERNALLY DISPLACED 148 19. THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS OF REFUGEES 167 20. REPATRIATION ISSUES RELATED TO THE EXILE OF THE POPULATION FROM THE SOUTH OF GEORGIA BY THE SOVIET REGIME IN THE 1940S 173 21. DISCRIMINATION OF ETHNIC GEORGIANS BY THE RUSSIAN AUTHORITIES 177 22. ASSISTANCE BY THE GEORGIAN AUTHORITIES TO THE DEPORTED PERSONS FROM THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 183 23. GEORGIAN CITIZEN PRISONERS AT THE DETENTION FACILITIES ABROAD 190 24. FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY AND MANIFESTATION 191 25.
    [Show full text]
  • National Academy of Sciences of Georgia Personal Data (CV)
    National Academy of Sciences of Georgia Personal Data (CV) Surname Korakhashvili Name Avtandil (Bidzina) Address (work, 13 km., Agmashenebeli alley, AUG, Tbilisi, 0151, Data and place of 24.09.1949, Tbilisi home) Georgia(w), Dighomi-7/31, Tbilisi, 0151, Georgia (h) berth Citizenship Georgia Telephones +955 577 40 6751, +995 599 22 6751 E-mail [email protected]/[email protected] Skype Korokha 3. Education Education Institution Time of study Secondary Tbilisi 57 public school 1956-1966 Higher Agricultural Institute of Georgia 1966-1971 Postgraduate ship, work for doctor’s thesis Agrarian State University of Georgia 1979-1984; 1985-1994 4. Knowledge of Languages Foreign languages Level of mastery (free, medium, with help of dictionary) English Free Russian Free 5. Scientific or Academic Degree and Rank თემის დასახელება Powered by name მინიჭების თარიღი Candidates Dissertation Selection of Crop Rotations for Alazani Valley 1984 Doctoral Dissertation Agro technology for Biological Nitrogen Fixation 1994 Professor Forage Production 1995 Corresponding Member of the Agro Technology 2009 Academy Member of the Academy, Agro Technology 2013 Academician 1 6. Work Experience Data Institution Position 1973-1975 Tbilisi Base Nursery Farm Head of Division 1975-1979 Ministry of Milk and Meat Industry of Georgia Senior Agro Technologist 1979- today Agrarian State University of Georgia lab assistant, Docent, Professor, Head of Chair, Full Professor 6.1 Teaching Activity Data Institution Position since 1980 Agrarian State University of Georgia Assistant, Docent, Professor 1992-1994 US College at the Academy of Sciences of Georgia Professor since 2005 Institute of Public Affairs of Georgia (GIPA) Invited Professor since 2011 Tbilisi State University Invited Professor 6.2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Force of International Competition (For the Fundamentals of Business and Law)
    Revaz Lordkipanidze The Force of International Competition (For the Fundamentals of Business and Law) Tbilisi 2017 Doctor of Economic Sciences (Specialization: World Economy and International Economic Relations), Founder of Academy of Business named after academician Avtandil Gunia, Academician of Georgian Academy of Economic Sciences Revaz Lordkipanidze (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revaz_Lordkipanidze http://revaz- lordkipanidze.simplesite.com) offers own interpretation for the most significant base of the World Peaceful Economic Policy – the rational defense of an effective international competition. This book about the force and problems of international competition will be useful for specialists of fundamentals and practice of Business and Law. R. Lordkipanidze writes: “I have great respect to the works of David Ricardo, but in the matter of a perfect competition, I have a different view than he and his critique - John Maynard Keynes. Ricardo thought, that under perfect competition, a large number of competitors should be equivalent, but Keynes criticized such views of Classics and He claimed, that such competition is not effective and it's necessarily interventions from outside. I made some news in the understanding of a perfect competition. These novelties are in the natural rationalism of borders (indexes) of a Competition and a human should protect those borders. A large number of competitors should not be without a boundary and it's not necessarily the equivalence of all participants. The large and small plants and animals coexist perfectly in a nature and a market must also be so, but protected from dishonest collusion monopolies. We must always remember a possible negative effect of "short circuit" in conditions of a very large number of competitors after the artificial division of the honest large business objects.” Sincerely from heart dedicated to the maximal Peaceful Future and those, who died 80 years ago in the mass repressions of the atheistic former Soviet Union (1937).
    [Show full text]
  • FARA Semi-Annual Report Ending June 30, 2017
    U.S. Department of Justice . Washington, D.C. 20530 Report of the Attorney General to the Congress of the United States on the Administration of the . Foreign Agents Registration Act . of 1938, as amended, for the six months ending June 30, 2017 Report of the Attorney General to the Congress of the United States on the Administration of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, for the six months ending June 30, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................... 1-1 AFGHANISTAN......................................................1 ALBANIA..........................................................2 ALGERIA..........................................................5 ANGOLA...........................................................6 ANTIGUA & BARBUDA................................................7 ARUBA............................................................8 AUSTRALIA........................................................9 AUSTRIA..........................................................10 AZERBAIJAN.......................................................11 BAHAMAS..........................................................12 BAHRAIN..........................................................13 BANGLADESH.......................................................14 BARBADOS.........................................................15 BELARUS..........................................................16 BELGIUM..........................................................17 BERMUDA..........................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Autonomy and Conflict
    Autonomy and Conflict Ethnoterritoriality and Separatism in the South Caucasus – Cases in Georgia Svante E. Cornell Uppsala 2002 Aey Charkhe Falak Kharabi Az Keena-e- Tu Ast Bedadgari Shiva-e Dereena Tu Ast Aey Khak Agar Seena-e Tu Bishi-kafand Bass Gohar-e Qeemati Ka Dar Seena-e Tu Ast Circling heaven, this decay is your ill-will Cruelty, your attribute so perennial O earth! If they cleave your chest In your bosom you hide a precious jewel! Ruba’iyat of Omar Khayyam (ca. 1048-1131) Translation by Dr. Imtiaz Kazi, 2000 Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor in Philosophy in Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University in 2002 ABSTRACT Cornell, Svante E.: Autonomy and Conflict: Ethnoterritoriality and Separatism in the South Caucasus – Cases in Georgia. Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Report No. 61. 258 pp. Uppsala. ISBN 91-506-1600-5. Providing minority populations with autonomy is gaining appreciation as a method of solving, managing, and even pre-empting ethnic conflict. However, in spite of the enthusiasm for autonomy solutions among academics and practitioners alike, there is reason to argue that the provision of autonomy for a minority may under certain circumstances increase rather than decrease the likelihood of conflict. In certain political conditions, autonomy strengthens the separate identity of a minority; it thereby increases its incentives to collective action against the state; and most of all its capacity to seek separation from the central state, through the state-like institutions that autonomy entails. The objective of this dissertation is to investigate whether territorial autonomy was a contributing factor to the violent ethnic conflicts that have erupted in the South Caucasus since the late 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • The FINANCIAL 19
    DoD Georgians think that In U.S., Real Estate Still incomesinc should be equal? Leads Stocks as Best ANI LORTKIPANIDZE, GORBI Investment See on p. 8 See on p. 16 13 May, 2019 News Making Money http://www.fi nchannel.com New Variable More Than One in Five Tbilisi Art Fair Uniting the World Created for By GELA awareness. MEGENEISHVILI Offering a range of Degree of Millennials Still Live With Mom exhibitions and activities, from markets and masterclasses, Urbanisation The FINANCIAL -- More 6.8 million (11.7%) to 14.3 “While it might be tempting arking its second to lectures and forums, TAF people age 23-37 are living million (21.9%). to stereotype these young appearance, presents a value far superior Worldwide with their moms than at any While the economy has adults as lazy millennials Tbilisi Art Fair to a mere exhibition and has time this century, according recovered since the housing bumming off of mom, the data (TAF) has already created a social hub where Lewis DIJKSTRA And to a Zillow® analysisi. Nearly bust and recession of the paints a different picture,” arts admirers are given the Andrew RZEPA made quite a buzz 22% of American millennials mid-2000s, young people said Zillow Senior Economist Mamong art followers and others. freedom to express their taste Gallup – more than 14 million in living with their moms has Sarah Mikhitarian. “When Sponsored by art industry and immerse themselves in total – live with their mom continued to rise. The share the housing market went bust supporter TBC Bank, from 17 contemporary artworks.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Journal of Human Social Science Post-Soviet States
    Online ISSN : 2249-460X Print ISSN : 0975-587X DOI : 10.17406/GJHSS AnalysisoftheCurriculum MigrationandAsylumProblems OwnershipandFinancialization PoliticalDimensionsofScience VOLUME19ISSUE4VERSION1.0 Global Journal of Human-Social Science: F Political Science Global Journal of Human-Social Science: F Political Science Volume 1 9 Issue 4 (Ver. 1.0) Open Association of Research Society Global Journals Inc. *OREDO-RXUQDORI+XPDQ (A Delaware USA Incorporation with “Good Standing”; Reg. Number: 0423089) Social Sciences. 2019. Sponsors:Open Association of Research Society Open Scientific Standards $OOULJKWVUHVHUYHG 7KLVLVDVSHFLDOLVVXHSXEOLVKHGLQYHUVLRQ Publisher’s Headquarters office RI³*OREDO-RXUQDORI+XPDQ6RFLDO 6FLHQFHV´%\*OREDO-RXUQDOV,QF Global Journals ® Headquarters $OODUWLFOHVDUHRSHQDFFHVVDUWLFOHVGLVWULEXWHG XQGHU³*OREDO-RXUQDORI+XPDQ6RFLDO 945th Concord Streets, 6FLHQFHV´ Framingham Massachusetts Pin: 01701, 5HDGLQJ/LFHQVHZKLFKSHUPLWVUHVWULFWHGXVH United States of America (QWLUHFRQWHQWVDUHFRS\ULJKWE\RI³*OREDO -RXUQDORI+XPDQ6RFLDO6FLHQFHV´XQOHVV USA Toll Free: +001-888-839-7392 RWKHUZLVHQRWHGRQVSHFLILFDUWLFOHV USA Toll Free Fax: +001-888-839-7392 1RSDUWRIWKLVSXEOLFDWLRQPD\EHUHSURGXFHG Offset Typesetting RUWUDQVPLWWHGLQDQ\IRUPRUE\DQ\PHDQV HOHFWURQLFRUPHFKDQLFDOLQFOXGLQJ SKRWRFRS\UHFRUGLQJRUDQ\LQIRUPDWLRQ Glo bal Journals Incorporated VWRUDJHDQGUHWULHYDOV\VWHPZLWKRXWZULWWHQ 2nd, Lansdowne, Lansdowne Rd., Croydon-Surrey, SHUPLVVLRQ Pin: CR9 2ER, United Kingdom 7KHRSLQLRQVDQGVWDWHPHQWVPDGHLQWKLV ERRNDUHWKRVHRIWKHDXWKRUVFRQFHUQHG 8OWUDFXOWXUHKDVQRWYHULILHGDQGQHLWKHU
    [Show full text]
  • FARA Second Semi-Annual Report
    U.S. Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530 Report of the Attorney General to the Congress of the United States on the Administration of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, for the six months ending December 31, 2013 Report of the Attorney General to the Congress of the United States on the Administration of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, for the six months ending December 31, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................... 1-1 ALBANIA..........................................................1 ALGERIA..........................................................2 ANGOLA...........................................................3 ANTIGUA & BARBUDA................................................4 ARUBA............................................................5 AUSTRALIA........................................................6 AUSTRIA..........................................................9 AZERBAIJAN.......................................................10 BAHAMAS..........................................................12 BAHRAIN..........................................................13 BANGLADESH.......................................................14 BARBADOS.........................................................15 BELGIUM..........................................................17 BERMUDA..........................................................18 BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA...............................................20 BRAZIL...........................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia: Political Developments and Implications for U.S
    Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia: Political Developments and Implications for U.S. Interests Jim Nichol Specialist in Russian and Eurasian Affairs September 27, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33453 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia: Political Developments Summary The United States recognized the independence of Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia when the former Soviet Union broke up at the end of 1991. The United States has fostered these states’ ties with the West in part to end their dependence on Russia for trade, security, and other relations. The United States has pursued close ties with Armenia to encourage its democratization and because of concerns by Armenian Americans and others over its fate. Close ties with Georgia have evolved from U.S. contacts with its pro-Western leadership. Successive Administrations have supported U.S. private investment in Azerbaijan’s energy sector as a means of increasing the diversity of world energy suppliers. The United States has been active in diplomatic efforts to resolve regional conflicts in the region. As part of the U.S. global counter-terrorism efforts, the U.S. military in 2002 began providing equipment and training for Georgia’s military and security forces. Troops from all three regional states have participated in stabilization efforts in Afghanistan and Iraq. The South Caucasian troops serving in Iraq departed in late 2008. The regional states also have granted transit privileges for U.S. military personnel and equipment bound for Afghanistan. Beginning on August 7, 2008, Russia and Georgia warred over Georgia’s breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia.
    [Show full text]