SSOOCCIIAALL IIMMPPAACCTT AASSSSEESSSSMMEENNTT SSTTUUDDYY FFIINNAALL RREEPPOORRTT
LAND ACQUISITION FOR MOOLAMPILLY-PIZHALA BRIDGE AND APPROACH ROAD
GOSHREE ISLAND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GIDA)
2Oth December 2017 SIA Unit
Rajagiri College of Social Sciences Rajagiri P.O Kalamassery, Pin: 682 104 Ph: 0484 2911111 - 2555564 www.rajagiri.edu
SSOOCCIIAALL IIMMPPAACCTT AASSSSEESSSSMMEENNTT SSTTUUDDYY ffiinnaall RREEPPOORRTT
LAND ACQUISITION FOR MOOLAMPILLY-PIZHALA BRIDGE AND APPROACH ROAD
GOSHREE ISLAND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GIDA)
2Oth December 2017 SIA Unit
Rajagiri College of Social Sciences Rajagiri P.O Kalamassery, Pin: 682 104 Ph: 0484 2911111 - 2555564 www.rajagiri.edu
ABBREVIATIONS CESS Centre for Earth Science Studies
CRZ Coastal Regulation Zone
DLPC District Level Purchase Committee
DPR Detailed Project Report
EIA Environment Impact Assessment
FGD Focus Group Discussion
GCDA Greater Cochin Development Authority
GIDA Goshree Islands Development Authority
GoI Government of India
GoK Government of Kerala
ICTT International Container Transshipment Terminal
KSHB Kerala State Housing Board
LA Land Acquisition
LSG Local Self Government
MOU Memorandum of Understanding
NH National Highway
PAF Project Affected Family
PAP Project Affected Person
PDF Project Displaced Family
RAP Resettlement Action Plan RTFCT in LARR Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act SIA Social Impact Assessment
SIMP Social Impact Management Plan FORM No.6 [See rule 15(5)] TABLE OF CONTENTS OF SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT AND SOCIAL IMPACT MANAGEMENT PLAN
CHAPTER 1 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1 Introduction - Project and Public Purpose 1.2 Location 1.3 Size and Attributes of Land Acquisition 1.4 Alternatives Considered 1.5 Social Impacts and Mitigation Measures
CHAPTER 2 - DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Background of the Project and Rationale for the Project 2.2 Project –Size, Location, Production Targets and Costs 2.3 Examination of Alternatives 2.4 Phases of the Project Construction 2.5 Details of Environment Impact Assessment and Feasibility Studies Conducted 2.6 Need for ancillary infrastructural facilities 2.7 Work force requirements 2.8 Applicable legislations and policies
CHAPTER 3 – TEAM COMPOSITION, STUDY APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 3.1 Background 3.2 SIA and SIMP Preparation Process 3.3 Desk Research 3.4 Reconnaissance 3.5 Data from Secondary Sources 3.6 Site Visits and Information Dissemination 3.7 Socio Economic Survey 3.8 Compilation and Verification of Data 3.9 Data Analysis and Report Writing 3.10 Community and Public Consultation
CHAPTER 4 - LAND ASSESSMENT 4.1 Background 4.2 Entire area of impact under the influence of the project 4.3 Land Inventories 4.4 Land requirement for the project 4.5 Use of Public Land 4.6 Land Already Purchased 4.7 Quantity of Land Proposed to be acquired 4.8 Previous transactions in the area
CHAPTER 5 - ESTIMATION AND ENUMERATION 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Directly affected 5.3 Indirectly impacted by project 5.4 Affected families 5.5 Inventory of productive assets
CHAPTER 6 - SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Demographic details 6.3 Income and poverty level 6.4 Vulnerable group 6.5 Land Use and Livelihood 6.6 Factors that contribute to local livelihoods
CHAPTER 7 - SOCIAL IMPACT MANAGEMENT PLAN 7.1 Approaches to Mitigation 7.2 Measures to avoid mitigate and compensate impact 7.3 Measures those are included in the terms of Rehabilitation and Resettlement 7.4 Measures that the Requiring Body has stated it will introduce in the Project Proposal 7.5 Alterations to project design and additional measures that may be required to address the extend and intensity of impacts across various groups as identified during the Social Impact Assessment process 7.6. Detailed Mitigation Plan
CHAPTER 8 - SOCIAL IMPACT MANAGEMENT PLAN INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK 8.1 Institutional Structures and Key Persons
CHAPTER 9 - SOCIAL IMPACT MANAGEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING OF MITIGATION PLAN 9.1 Costs of all resettlement and rehabilitation 9.2 Annual budget and plan of action 9.3 Funding sources with breakup
CHAPTER 10- SOCIAL IMPACT MANAGEMENT PLAN MONITORING AND EVALUATION 10.1 Key Monitoring and Evaluative indicators 10.2 Reporting mechanisms and monitoring roles 10.3 Plan of independent evaluation
CHAPTER 11 - ANALYSIS OF COSTS AND BENEFITS AND RECOMMENDATION ON ACQUISITION
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1 Analysis of various possible social impacts and their proposed mitigation measures
Table 4.1 Area of Impact
Table 4.2 Quantity of Land Acquisition
Table 5.3 Duration of Possession/Ownership on Property
Table 6.1 Age Group and Gender
Table 6.2 Religious Group
Table 6.3 Marital Status of the Project Affected Persons
Table 6.4 Educational Attainment of the Project Affected Persons
Table 6.5 Family Monthly Income
Table 6.6 Occupational Pattern and Non Working Status of the Project Affected Persons
LIST OF ANNEXURES
Annexure 1 (a) : 4 (1) Gazatte Notification
Annexure 1 (b) : 4 (1) Notification (Malayalam)
Annexure 1 (c) : 4 (1) Notification (English)
Annexure 1 (d) : Moolampilly-Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road Alignment
Sketch
Annexure 2 : Socio Economic Survey Questionnaire
Annexure 3 (a) : Public Hearing Notification (Deepika)
Annexure 3 (b) : Public Hearing Notification (Deshabhimani)
Annexure 3 (c) : Newspaper Notifications (Correction)
Annexure 4 : SIA in News
Annexure 5 : Notice to the affected families/companies
Annexure 6 (a) : List of participants – affected families
Annexure 6 (b) : Participants - officials
Annexure 7 : Government of Kerala – Revenue Department- State Policy for Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition. Annexure 8 : Details of affected families
CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1. Introduction - Project and Public Purpose When island villages are in their developmental stages, it is imperative to spurn the isolation of these islands by developing convenient transportation facilities. The construction of roads and bridges will connect the islands to towns and other localities. The movement of the people in the islands will be easiest through the construction of bridges, which will bring social and economical development to the islands. The proposed Moolampilly-Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road Construction is the Phase 1 of Moolampilly Chathanad Road Project. The proposed Moolampilly - Chathanad Road would connect Ezhikkara and Kadamakkudy Panchayaths to the Vallarpadom NH Connectivity road at Moolampilly. The proposed road will have a width of 22 m and a length of 4.345 Km. When completed, this road would connect the isolated small islands in the Vembanad backwater system such as Moolampilly, Pizhala, Kadamakkudy in Kadamakkudy Panchayath and Chathanad in Ezhikkara Panchayath with each other and with the mainland. The people living in the islands depend on the mainland for all their basic requirements like their Medical Needs, Educational facilities, etc. The road is expected to provide the required connectivity to the islands. The proposed connectivity of these Panchayaths to the National Highway is very important in view of their socio-economic development and management of any disaster. Once completed, the road will also enable to develop a direct link between NH 17 at North Paravur to the ICTT link road, which will reduce the travel time between North Paravur and Ernakulam to 30 minutes. It will be the shortest road connectivity from the ICTT road to NH 17 at North Paravur. It also connects the islands such as Pizhala, Cheriyakadamakkudy, Valiyakadamakkudy and Chathanad to the main land.
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road Page 3
The “Construction of Moolampilly – Pizhala Bridge and its approaches‖ is taken as Phase I of the project. Phase I envisages the construction of Moolampilly – Pizhala Bridge to a length of 608 m, avoiding reclamation of wet land. The project cost comes to Rs. 81.75 crores. Government vide G.O. (Rt.) No. 2539/2014/LSGD dated 27/9/2014 have accorded Administrative and Expenditure sanction for the project.
1.2 Location The affected area belongs to Kadamakudy Village, Kanayannur Taluk in Ernakulum District. The proposed bridge will connect Pizhala island to Moolampilly and to ICTT road.
1.3 Size and Attributes of Land Acquisition
The proposed project will involve land acquisition of 0.6087 hectares of land. Out of the total land requirement, 0.5344 hectare is jointly owned by Hexatech Developers (Pvt) Ltd and Nippon Realters (Pvt) Ltd, three families own properties which total to 0.0611 hectares of land, and rest 0.0132 hectare of land is jointly owned by 3 families. Out of the 13 affected properties, ten are wetland, two are Nilam Nikathu Purayidam (land converted by filling paddy field), and the remaining one is dry land.
1.4 Alternatives considered 90% of the construction of Moolampilly-Pizhala Bridge has completed. The proposed project envisages only the construction of approach road to the bridge. Hence, the consideration of alternatives at this stage is not relevant here.
1.5 Social Impacts & Mitigation Measures It appears from the analysis and overview of the act, that the provisions of compensation for land acquisition under RTFCT in LARR Act, 2013 will be sufficient to manage the social impacts due to the project. 80% of the compensation fixed by the DLPC in 2015 was disbursed to the affected families. Since the acquisition is
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road Page 4 being held now as per RTFCT in LARR Act, 2013, the balance amount determined by the Collector as per the Section 26 of the act and all eligible amount, including compensation, interest (if any) shall be awarded to the land owners.
Table 1.1. Analysis of the various possible social impacts and their proposed mitigation measures Sl. Proposed Mitigation Type of Impact Status No Measure Compensation as per 13 Land holdings would be 1 Loss of Land RTFCT in LARR Act, affected – Direct Impact 2013 Loss of Built-up 2 Nil Property Compensation as per Loss of Productive 8 coconut trees will be 3 RTFCT in LARR Act, Assets destroyed 2013
4 Loss of Livelihood Nil -
Loss of public utilities 5 Nil - lines
Loss of common 6 Nil - property Loss of Access to civic 7 Services and common Nil - property Resources Loss of Cultural 8 Nil - Properties
Displacement of 9 Nil - Vulnerable Groups
Loss of Religious 10 Nil - Structures
Presently, no families are residing in the project area so there is no direct impact on their housing. Apart from coconut farming (only 8 trees), no other
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road Page 5 economic activities are being undertaken in the area, as such livelihood of no families is affected.
Whereas M/s. Hexatech Developers (Pvt) Ltd and Nippon Realters (Pvt) Ltd. who were proposing to start an IT project in the land jointly owned by them at the affected area were hindered due to the project. The access to one portion of the aforesaid property is also hindered during the construction phase.
Multiple land acquisition Among the affected families two families were engaged in coconut and prawn farming at the project area till 2007 which was a source of income for them during that time. For the construction of the International Container Transshipment Terminal Road Project, the aforesaid land was acquired, and the two families were affected on their source of income during that time. For those two families, this is second acquisition for a public purpose and one among them is losing his total land in the project area. One family lost access to their remaining property (during the construction phase) has also to be considered as affected and requires a way out for the issue. Note: The above data is arrived from the information provided by the respondents during the Survey. Supporting documents need to be verified.
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road Page 6
CHAPTER 2 DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1. Background of the Project and Rationale for Project The Moolampilly – Chathanad road project is a major project approved by the General Council of Goshree Islands Development Authority (GIDA). GIDA was constituted for the integrated development of the islands of Kochi, as per GO (Ms)No. 114/94/LAD dt. 18.5.1994. The Authority was constituted as per the provisions of the Town Planning Act. The jurisdictional area of the authority covers part of Kochi Corporation and eight Grama Panchayaths, namely Elamkunnappuzha, Edavanakkad, Njarakkal, Nayarambalam, Kuzhuppilly, Pallippuram, Kadamakkudy, and Mulavukad having a total area of 100 Km2. As part of the development of Islands, GIDA constructed Goshree Bridges. Government vide GO(Ms) 234/2001 dt. 22.8.2001 has given permission to GIDA to sell 25 hectares of reclaimed land for mobilizing funds for the project. The Moolampilly – Chathanad road project proposal is to develop a major four lane road connecting Moolampilly and Chathanad near North Paravur. It would connect Ezhikkara – Kadamakkudy Panchayaths to the Vallarpadom NH Connectivity road at Moolampilly. The proposed road will have a width of 22 m and a length of 4.345 Km. When completed, this road would connect the highly isolated small islands such as Moolampilly, Pizhala, and Kadamakkudy in Kadamakkudy Panchayaths and Chathanad in Ezhikkara Grama Panchayath in the Vembanad backwater system with each other and with the mainland. The people living in these islands depend on the main land for all the basic requirements like their medical needs, educational facilities etc. The road is expected to provide the required connectivity to the islands. The proposed connectivity of these Panchayaths to the National Highway is very important in view of their socio-economic development and management of any disaster. Once completed, the road will also
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road Page 7 enable the development of a direct link between NH 17 at North Paravur to the ICTT link road, which will reduce the travel time between North Paravur and Ernakulam to 30 minutes. Thus, the proposed project shall be considered for the public purpose as per section 2(1)b(i) of RTFCT in LARR Act, 2013 (30 of 2013).
The “Construction of Moolampilly – Pizhala Bridge and its approaches” is taken at Phase I of the project. Phase I envisages the construction of Moolampilly – Pizhala Bridge to a length of 608 m, avoiding reclamation of wet land. The project cost comes to Rs. 81.75 crores. Government vide G.O. (Rt.) No. 2539/2014/LSGD dated 27/9/2014 have accorded Administrative and Expenditure sanction to GIDA for the project.
2.2. Project size, location, production targets and costs The proposed Moolampilly Chathanad Road would connect Ezhikkara – Kadamakkudy Panchayaths to the Vallarpadom NH Connectivity road at Moolampilly. The proposed road will have a width of 22 m and a length of 4.345 km. When completed, this road would connect the highly isolated small islands in the Vembanad backwater system such as Moolampilly, Pizhala, Kadamakkudy in Kadamakkudy Panchayath and Chathanad in Ezhikkara Panchayath with each other and with the main land. The affected area belongs to Kadamakudy Village in Kanayannur Taluk. The proposed bridge will connect Pizhala Island to Moolampilly, which will connect to the ICTT road. Phase I of the project envisages the construction of Moolampilly – Pizhala Bridge to a length of 608 m, avoiding reclamation of wet land. The project cost comes to Rs. 81.75 crores and Government vide G.O. (Rt.) No. 2539/2014/LSGD dated 27/9/2014 have accorded Administrative and Expenditure sanction for the project. Goshree Island Development Authority (GIDA) has engaged KSCC Ltd. as the implementing agency for the construction of the Moolampilly Pizhala Bridge.
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road Page 8
KSCC Ltd. has awarded the work to the tenderor M/s. Cheriyan Varkey Construction Company Pvt Ltd. The estimate PAC is Rs.70.64 crores. The KSCC Ltd. has awarded the work of Structural Design to M/s. Sri. Giri Consultants, Kochi. The work involves the construction of bridge having 21 spans and having a total length of 608 meters. The width of the carriage way of this bridge is 7.5 meters. Te foot path is 0.75 m wide and is a duct footpath slab on both sides with crash barriers and hand rails. A Traffic Island is proposed at Ch. 600 m with a diameter of 32 meters, which will enable the forward connectivity.
Structural Components of the work RCC Cast In Situ Pile Pile Cap Pier Cap ( Hammer Head) Pedestal Wall, Pedestal Post Tensioned Girders Deck Slab 6 spans of Solid slab without beam Wearing Coat Foot Path 75 cm Width on either sides with Duct Hand Rails on either sides 29.60 m wide Bell mouth approach @ ICTT road end 32.00 m dia. Traffic Island @ Pizhala end Total Width of Bridge 9.6m Carriage way width 7.5m
2.3. Examination of alternatives 90% of the construction of Moolampilly-Pizhala Bridge has completed. The proposed project envisages only construction of the approach road to the bridge. Hence, the consideration of alternatives is not relevant here.
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road Page 9
2.4. Phases of the Project Construction Moolampilly – Chathanad road is a major project of GIDA approved by the General Council of GIDA. The proposal is to develop a major four lane road connecting Moolampilly and Chathanad near North Paravur. The proposed Moolampilly-Chathanad Road would connect Ezhikkara – Kadamakkudy Panchayaths to the Vallarpadom NH Connectivity road at Moolampilly. When completed, this road will have a width of 22 m and a length of 4.345 km, connecting the highly isolated small islands such as Moolampilly, Pizhala, Kadamakkudy in Kadamakkudy Panchayath and Chathanad in Ezhikkara Panchayath with each other and with the main land.
The General Council of GIDA, in its 28th meeting held on 12/02/2013, decided to undertake the above project as four independent projects and decided to entrust the work to KSCC (Kerala State Construction Corporation). The ―Construction of Moolampilly – Pizhala Bridge and its approaches‖ is taken at Phase I of the project. The Phase I envisages the construction of Moolampilly – Pizhala Bridge to a length of 608 m, avoiding the reclamation of wet land.
2.5 Details of Environment Impact Assessment & Technical Feasibility Study Conducted Since the construction is within the coastal zone, a detailed study of the coastal ecosystem and morphology was necessary. GIDA entrusted the above task to the Centre for Earth Science Studies (CESS), Thiruvananthapuram. Accordingly, CESS conducted a detailed study and prepared a CRZ (Coastal Regulation Zone) status report for the Moolampilly – Chathanad Road Project with their recommendations. Government vide GO (Rt.) No. 87/2014/ENVT dated 22/05/2014 have granted wet land clearance for the project. The 20th general council meeting of GIDA held on 26/12/05 had entrusted the work of evaluating the feasibility of the Moolampliiy - Chathanad road project to the Kerala State Housing Board. An MOU also was signed between GIDA and KSHB on 18.01.06. As per the MOU, KSHB has carried out:
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road Page 10
The Detailed Topographical survey of the alignment Preparation of the General Alignment Drawing Structural Design Design Calculation Estimate of the Project. Etc. The Housing Board has examined the various alternatives and feasibility of the project. On the basis of the above mentioned studies, the existing alignment of Moolampilly-Pizhala Bridge and approach road project was arrived upon.
2.6 Need for Ancillary Infrastructural facilities The Moolampilly - Chathanad project of GIDA is a new road project connecting the ICTT Link road to Chathanad near North Paravur. Being an entirely new road formation through islands that are not connected by road to the mainland, there were not many requirements from any ancillary infrastructure facilities.
2.7. Workforce requirements The work force is equipped with modern machineries and planned man power in various range in terms of skilled, semi- skilled, and unskilled labours. The project cost comes to Rs. 81.75 crores. Government vide G.O. (Rt.) No. 2539/2014/LSGD dated 27/9/2014 have accorded Administrative and Expenditure sanction to GIDA for the project.
2.8. Applicable legislations and policies The applicable laws on land acquisition, rehabilitation, and resettlement for the proposed Moolampilly-Pizhala Bridge and approach road: The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Government of Kerala – Revenue Department -State Policy for Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Right to Information Act, 2005
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road Page 11
CHAPTER 3 TEAM COMPOSITION, STUDY APPROACH, AND METHODOLOGY
3.1 Background As per the Kerala Gazette Notification No.33 dated 15.08.2017, Ernakulam District Administration has entrusted Rajagiri College of Social Sciences, Kalamassery as the SIA Unit to conduct the Social Impact Assessment of land acquisition to Moolampilly-Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road. The objective of a Social Impact Assessment (SIA) is to enumerate affected land and structures, affected families and persons, to identify social impacts, and to prepare Social Impact Management Plan (SIMP). In order to capture data for the present exercise, both primary as well as secondary sources were systematically tapped. As a part of SIA, a census socio-economic survey has been conducted by experienced members of the SIA Unit in the area of Moolampilly-Pizhala bridge and the approach road to assess the adverse impacts of the project.
3.2 SIA and SIMP Preparation Process A Social Impact Assessment and Resettlement Action Plan are required when a project results in either physical or economic displacement of the people. The resettlement plan ensure that the livelihoods of people affected by the project are restored to levels prevailing before inception of the project. While preparing draft SIA and SIMP, the study team followed some essential components and steps which are (i) identification of socio-economic impacts of the project (ii) legal framework for land acquisition and compensation (RTFCT in LARR Act 2013). A public/community consultation (Public Hearing) was held on 15th November 2017, the remarks and clarifications raised are included in the report. Figure 3.1 presents approach and methodology of the SIA study in the form of a flow chart. Also, various steps involved in the study have been described in detail in the following paragraphs.
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road Page 12
FIGURE 3.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY FOR SIA
Phase-I PRE- SURVEY ACTIVITIES
LITERATURE REVIEW &PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY SURVEY & LAUNCHING CONSULTATIONS OF FIELD WORK
Detail Project Report(DPR) Pilot Study Project Alignment Drawing Preparation & testing survey instruments RTCT in LARR Act 2013 Identification of team members for data State Policy on Land Acquisition collection Discussion with Land and Revenue officials Finalization of Inception Report
Phase-II SURVEY OF PAFs/PAPs & IMPLEMENTATION SYSTEM
PROJECT AFFECTED IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS FAMILIES/PERSONS/COMMUNITIES Analysis of legal policy and regulation Training the Field Staff Discussion with Land and Revenue officials 100% Census survey among the affected on implementation of RAP families/persons Content analysis Public consultation Field work arrangement, data collection, Discussion with officials of concerned analysis & draft SIA report department
Phase-III POST SURVEY ACTIVITIES ANALYSIS REPOT
DATA ANALYSIS AND SIA REPORT CONSULTATION ON SIA REPORT
Organizing public hearings Data tabulation and analysis plan Data coding, cleaning, and entry Consultation on SIA findings with affected people, civil societies Finalization of SIA report structure Analysis of survey results Sharing of concerns by stakeholders Review & comments from concerned officials Preparation and submission of draft SIA report Incorporation of comments and submission of the final SIA report
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road Page 13
3.3 Desk Research The study team reviewed the relevant documents and the project alignment drawing.
3.4 Reconnaissance The study team is headed by the Principal of Rajagiri College of Social Sciences, who is the Chairman of the SIA Unit. A team of seven members having experience in conducting Social Impact Assessment studies and socio-economic surveys were assigned for data collection, monitoring of data collection, coordination and report preparation of the study. Representatives from the Revenue Department supported the investigators to identify the affected families. SIA Team Members Sl.No Name Qualification and Experience Designation 1 Dr.Binoy Joseph MA(HRM), LLB, Ph.D. 22 years in Chairman - SIA Unit teaching, research and training MSW, 30 years in Meena Kuruvilla 2. Consultant- SIA Unit development
sector MSW, Project 21 years in 3 Princy Jacob Coordinator - SIA Unit development sector MA, DSS, 25 years in 4 Maria Tency.V.S Research Associate – SIA development Unit sector BA,DSS, 23 years in 5 Ranjith K U Research Associate – SIA development Unit sector
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road Page 14
1 year in MSW, Documentation 6 Arun Mathews George development Officer sector 23 years in 7 Biju C.P BA – Research Associate development sector
3.5 Data from Secondary Sources Secondary source information was collected from various concerned departments and a host of other literatures. Thus, secondary source information complemented the primary data elicited through field survey from the affected people and other stakeholders. Understanding was created about the physical, social, economic, and cultural set-up of the project area before undertaking detailed field investigations.
3.6 Site Visits and Information Dissemination During the second week of September 2017, the SIA team visited the sites to verify the alignment drawings on the ground and to identify the affected areas. After identifying the affected areas, the SIA unit consulted with different stakeholders at the project area and organized meetings with them to generate awareness about the study. The survey team collected the data in the months of September and October 2017.
3.7 Socio Economic Survey Before the actual household Socio-Economic Survey, all the properties that were likely to be affected by the project were identified with the support of the Revenue Department staff. The survey was conducted through door-to-door personal interview. In this interview, the size and nature of the land was recorded. The details of affected families, possession of legal documents, data related to social profile, family details, occupation, source of income, family expenditure, self
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road Page 15 employment activities, and employment pattern were collected. Majority of the interview schedule has been pre-coded, except those reflecting the opinion and views of PAFs, which have been left open-ended. Before filling the questionnaires, the affected families were asked to provide a copy of the necessary documents they need to produce as proof of their ownership of the property.
Photograph of the affected area
3.8 Compilation and Verification of Data Survey forms duly filled were consolidated and entered into a database. This information was updated on a regular basis, as and when data for incomplete forms were filled in.
3.9 Data Analysis and Report Writing Followed by the compilation and verification of data, the same was analysed and accordingly the report was prepared.
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road Page 16
3.10 Community and Public Consultation Discussions were conducted by the SIA unit with various primary and secondary stakeholders in order to obtain their views and suggestions to minimize adverse social impacts. The methods which were adopted for conducting public consultation were (i) Informal personal consultation (ii) In-depth individual interviews.
3.11.Public Hearing As per Form 5 Rule 14 (1) of the RTFCT in LARR Act, 2013, a public/community consultation (Public Hearing) was held on 15th November 2017 at Monica Hall, St.Augustines Church, Pizhala, in which the representatives of the affected families/companies, the LA officer, officials from the LA office, GIDA, Rajagiri College (SIA Unit), and ward members of Kadamakudy Panchayath participated. The queries/issues raised by the affected people and remarks from Special Tahsildar LA (GCDA) and GIDA (requiring body) are mentioning below: Name and Sl. Survey Remarks from the requiring Address of the Situation explained Issues/Objections Raised No No. body individual/family GIDA has not acquired any a) 10 cents of his land was land in Kadamakudy village acquired for Vallarpadam As this is a second as per LA Act. An extent of Terminal project and the Mrs.&Mr. Ancilin acquisition and he is the 2.57Ares (6.35 cents) of land 531/2 remaining 6 cents acquired Joseph only person who lost the in Sy.No.531/2 of for the Moolampilly 1 Panakkal House whole property in the Kadamakudy village was Pizhala bridge. Now this Moolampilli project area , requested to taken possession of for the is the 2nd acquisition and Kochi : 682027 consider for a better Moolampilly –Pizhala Bridge no land left for him in the compensation Project. The DLPC Rate was project area. fixed by the District
Collector @ Rs.5,50,000/- per cent for dry land. In compliance of the judgment in WP(C) No.21517/2015, 80% of DLPC Rate was paid to Sri.Anciline after executing an agreement with the Secretary, GIDA. The court also ordered to initiate LA proceedings as per the new LARR Act 2013. Accordingly LA proceedings has been initiated in the case and the party is entailed to get the compensation as per the LARR Act.
b). His land lays as Requested that he should Party is eligible for the frontage to National get a compensation based compensation fixed as per Highway on frontage value the LARR Act.
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road Page 18
c) Due to the acquisition for Vallarpadam Terminal project, he has lost paddy Requested to provide There is no provision under field, prawn farming, and employment for (one LARR Act to provide coconut farming (loss of son)/ one member in all employment for this project. income). He was planning the affected families Hence the request of the land to start business for his according to their owner cannot be two sons in the presently qualification considered. acquired land and that hope is losing now
P.R.S.Kumar The DLPC meeting was held Representative of on 14/09/15 and not in 2012, Hexatech a)Decided DLPC purchase The District Collector has Developers(P)Ltd value is Rs.4 lakh for dry fixed DLPC Rate for the land Door land and Rs.3 lakh for acquired for Moolampilly – 514/3 NoCCXL/242, reclaimed land which was Consider the Pizhala Bridge area. The 515/8 Bio Pharma fixed in 2012 and the area developments in the area following are the categories 516/3 Layam Road developed with the and their business loss and value of each category. 516/4 Ernakulam Vallarpadam Project. when provide 1. category 2 516/7 & Presently there exists Rs. compensation. They No.1-Dry land-Rs.5,50,000/- 516/10 Nippon 10 to 15 lakhs market demand market value+ per cent 516/11 Realtors(P)Ltd value solatium + statutory 2. category 516/12 Door No.10/314 benefits etc. No.II- Wet now Dry- 516/14 K.Nippon Towers Rs.4,50,000/- per cent N.H.47 Bypass 3. category Nettoor.P.O. No.III- Wet land Maradu Rs.3,50,000/- per cent. The property of M/S. Hexa
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road Page 19
Tech Developers and M/S. Nippon Relaters Pvt.Ltd. comes under category No.3. The land value claimed at Rs.10 to 15 lakhs is highly exorbitant and without any basis. The nature of the property is wet land and there is no provision for reclaiming wet land. Government vide G.O.(Rt.) No.4120/15/RD dt.05/08/15 have accorded sanction for direct purchase of the land by negotiation. Accordingly action was taken for payment of compensation as per DLPC Rate. Aggrieved by the value fixed by District Collector the land owners preferred writ petition before the Hon’ble High Court as WP ( C ) No. 12844/16. The High Court of Kerala as per the judgment in WP ( C ) No. 12844/2016 dated 09/06/2016 has directed the District Collector to initiate proceedings under
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road Page 20
the RFCT in LARR Act 2013 in relation to the property of landowners and to pay 80% of the compensation determined by them within one month from 09/06/2016. Accordingly in compliance of the judgment, the Special Thahsildar (LA), GCDA disbursed 80% of the amount after executing agreements with the Secretary GIDA and M/s. Hexa Tech Developers Pvt.Ltd. & M/s. Nippon Realters Pvt. Ltd.
The providing of
b) Acquisition divided accessibility to the remaining Provide accessibility to 8 their land into two parts property of the landowners acres of land as per the and access has denied to 8 will be decided after LARRA act acres of land. completion of the bridge.
c) Company purchased the land to start an IT park dreamed to provide job for There is no evidence to 10,000 IT professionals Consider that too when substantiate the claims for and invested crores of Rs decide on compensation loss of earning due to the for that. The loss of that proposed acquisition. dream causes a mental injury to them.
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road Page 21
An extent of 1.04 Ares (2.57 cents) of land in Sy. No.531/1 of Kadamakudy village is taken possession of, for Moolampilly-Pizhala Bridge Project. The land was included in second category and fixed an amount of Rs. 4,50,000/- per cent. Government of Kerala vide GO (Rt.) No.4120/15/RD dated 05/08/15 have accorded sanction for direct a)This is the 2nd Consider second purchase of land by way of Alex Joseph acquisition acquisition for better negotiation. Aggrieved by 3 Panakkal House 531/1 compensation the fixation of the value by Moolampilly the District Collector the land owner preferred a writ petition before the Hon’ble High Courta as WP ( C ) No.21517/2015. The High Court Kerala as per the judgement in WP ( C ) No.21517/2015 has ordered to initiate land acquisition of land of the petitioners and to pay 80% of the compensation determined by them. Accordingly, in compliance of the judgment
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road Page 22
the Special Thahsildar (LA) GCDA disbursed 80% of the amount after executing an agreement with the Secretary, GIDA and the petitioners.
Request for a better b)The land lies as frontage The land has no direct compensation than the to National Highway access to NH land lays away from NH
c) Lost access to his The question of providing remaining property of 30 Demand for getting direct access to the remaining land cents of land and not get a access to his property from service road will be justified answer from the from the service road of decided after obtaining authorities for his the National Highway sanction from NH and KSCC continuous written appeal
Alex Joseph An extent of 2.50 Ares (6.18 Panakkal House cents) of land in Sy.No. Moolampilly Request for better 531/1 of Kadamakudy 6 cents of her land is compensation considering village was taken possession 4 531/1 acquiring. No land (Anitha Elizabeth her as citizen who have of, for the above project. The remains as her own Josmin Villa no land property of the landowner Pattaparambil was included in second House category and the District
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road Page 23
Kandanad Collector has fixed the DLPC Kothad) rate @ 4,50,000/- per cent. The landowner is not entitled to get any benefit claimed by them.
The affected families Consider the remainiing already lost their paddy land in the grade of field, prawn farming, purayidam. coconut farm etc due to
the acquisition of Vallarpadam Terminal The party has not requested Flevin Antony project. So the livelihood to acquire his land as per 5 (Relative of Alex 531/1 was then affected. Now Act 30 of 2013. Joseph) their dream to start any business in the remaining land also lost due to the To help the younger acquisition for generation, sanction Moolampilly pizhala unconditionally any of the bridge projects they applied
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road Page 24
Photographs of Public Hearing
Representing the Kadamakudy Panchayath, Smt.Treasa Manuel, Standing Committee Chairperson and Mr.Mathew Aattullil, Ward member, also spoke during the public hearing. They requested to sanction reasonable compensation to the affected families since some of these families had given up their property without hesitance during the land acquisition for Vallarpadam Terminal project, and this is a second acquisition on their property.
CHAPTER 4 LAND ASSESSMENT 4.1 Background A socio-economic survey covering all affected families and individuals was carried out in the months of September and October 2017. A structured interview schedule to gain a full understanding of impacts was used to collect detailed information on affected property, impacts on private assets, income, and livelihoods. The objective of the survey was to assess social impacts on the people affected by the project, their socio-economic profile, type of property, ownership of property, type of impact in its magnitude, and details of the affected property. The major findings and magnitude of impacts are discussed in the following sections.
4.2 Entire area of impact under the influence of the project Table 4.1 indicates overall project impacts. A total of 0.6087 hectares of land shall be acquired for the project. The whole area of land is under private ownership and is open land. Out of the total 13 affected properties, 9 properties belong to 2 companies, namely Hexatech Developers Private Ltd and Nippon Realtors Private Ltd as a joint property. Three are owned by individuals and one is jointly owned by three individuals. Based on the property identification, the number of PAFs has been determined. There are six affected families consisting of 24 persons and 2 affected companies by the proposed project.
Table 4.1 Area of Impact
Acquisition of Land (in Ha)
Owned by Private Limited Companies 0.5344 Individual ownership (3 separate properties) 0.0611 Joint ownership (1 property) 0.0132 Total 0.6087
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road 26
Impact on properties
Properties affected (no) 13 Total PAFs (no) 6 Total Project Affected Companies (no) 2 Total PAPs (no) 24 Total PDFs (no) Nil Titleholder (no) 8 Non Titleholder (no) Nil Loss of Residence (no) Nil Loss of Business (no) Nil
Loss of Livelihood (No) Nil
4.3 Land Inventories (Map of site of Proposed Moolampilly-Pizhala Bridge)
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road 27
4.4 Land requirement for the project The proposed project of construction of Moolampilly-Pizhala Bridge and approach road shall require 0.6087 hectares of land for the implementation of the project. The affected area is under private possession, and no government properties are affected because of the project.
4.5 Use of Public Land No public property is hindered due to the implementation of the project.
4.6 Land Already Purchased A DLPC was constituted for the land acquirement, prior to the ongoing land acquisition process. Thus the land owners were given 80% of the land value as per the DLPC rate.
4.7 Quantity of Land Proposed to be acquired Table 4.2 Quantity of land acquisition
Loss of property (Area in Hectares) No of title holders loosing property
0.0104 1
0.0132 3 (joint ownership) 0.0250 1 0.0257 1
0.5344 2 (owned by 2 companies) Total 8
In total, 13 properties are affected by the project, Table 4.2 reveals that these properties belong to eight title holders. Three individuals forego 0.0104, 0.0250, 0.0257 hectors of land each. 0.0132 hectors of affected land is jointly owned by three individuals, and 0.5344 hectors of affected land is jointly owned by two companies. 4.8 Previous transactions in the area As per the information given by the respondents, no land transactions had taken place in the affected area for the last three years.
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road 28
CHAPTER 5 ESTIMATION AND ENUMERATION 5.1 Introduction This chapter consists of the estimation of livelihood for affected families, scale of impact on families i.e., directly affected families and indirectly affected families. It also discusses the loss of inventory in the affected area.
5.2 Directly Affected In total, six families and two private limited companies shall be affected by the project. The area planned to be procured is not hampering the livelihood of the respondents as such there is no direct effect on livelihood by the project. The whole proposed project area is open land, except farming of eight coconut trees. Apart from that no other agricultural activities are being undertaken. There are no economic activities being carried out in the area. However, the two private limited companies, ie., Hexatech Developers (Pvt) Ltd and Nippon Realters (Pvt) Ltd owning 0.5344 hectares of land proposed the development of a Private Integrated IT and High Tech Park. The aforesaid project which was sanctioned by Department of Information Technology, Government of Kerala as per the order issued GO(MS)No.10/2013/ITD dated 03/09/2013. Due to the proposed Moolampilly-Pizhala Bridge and approach road project, the project proposals (Private Integrated IT and High Tech Park) of the affected companies was withdrawn (as the property is being divided into two parts for the construction of Moolampilly-Pizhala Bridge). The access to the property is hindered due to the elevation of the bridge, and therefore the implementation of an IT and High Tech Park becomes unfeasible.
5.3 Indirectly Affected by the Project Presently, no families are residing in the project area so there is no direct impact on their housing or livelihood. Among the affected families, two families had been engaged in coconut and prawn farming at the project area, which was their source of income at that time. During the construction of the International
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road 29
Container Transshipment Terminal Road project, the said land was acquired, and the families lost the aforesaid income source. For the said acquisition, they received only a nominal compensation as per the then existing Government Rules and as per the information revealed by the families, there is a dispute existing on this issue in court. (Source: affected families, sufficient documents need to be verified).
Hexatech Developers (Pvt) Ltd and Nippon Realters (Pvt) Ltd purchased the property in the affected area, and they were aiming to start a project visualizing employment for 2,30,000 people (as per the copy of project proposal report received from the respondents).
5.4 Affected Families Table 5.3 Duration of possession/ownership on property
Sl.No. Survey No. of land Average Duration of ownership
1 514/3 10 years 2 515/8 10 years 3 516/3 10 years 4 516/4 10 years 5 516/7 10 years 6 516/10 10 years 7 516/11 10 years 8 516/12 10 years 9 516/14 10 years 10 531/1P More than 25 years 11 531/1P More than 10 years 12 531/2 More than 25 years 13 283/3 10 years
Among the total 13 properties in the project affected area, ten land are owned for the last ten years. Two title holders owned the land as hereditary for more than 25 years, and one title holder received the property from her father ten years before.
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road 30
5.5 Inventory of Productive Assets The respondents and local people shared that there was plenty of coconut trees in the project affected area and that most of them were destroyed during the land filling for the construction of Moolampilly-Pizhala Bridge and approach road. Presently, there are only eight coconut trees which shall also be affected.
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road 31
CHAPTER 6 SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL PROFILE
6.1 Introduction This chapter contains information about the socio-economic and cultural aspects of the affected families. It includes the demographic details, economic status, vulnerability among the affected families, local economic activities in the area, enumeration of the livelihoods of affected families, socialization pattern of the project affected persons, and other related information.
6.2 Demographic Details
Table 6.1 Age Group and Gender
Gender Age in years Total Male Female
0-18 1 1 2
19-30 3 5 8
31-45 4 1 5
46-59 1 2 3
60 and above 4 2 6
Total 13 11 24
Table 6.1 reveals the age group distribution of the affected persons in the area. Six respondents are above 60 years of age. Out of them, four are male and two are females. Two female members and one male member are in the age group of 46-59. Five family members belong to the age group of 31-45 years. Four males and one female contribute towards this number. Eight family members, including three males and five females belong to the 19-30 age group, and two members— one male and one female, belong to the age group of 0-18 years.
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road 32
Table 6.2 Religious Group
Religion No of families Percent
Muslim 1 16.67
Christian 5 83.33
Total 6 100
Table 6.2 indicates the distribution of families on the basis of religious group. Out of the 6 affected families, five (83.33%) follows Christian religion and one family (16.66%) follow Muslim.
Social Group All the 6 affected families are belonging to OBC group.
Table 6.3 Marital status of Project Affected Persons
Marital Status Frequency Percent
Married 8 33.33
Unmarried 16 66.67
Total 24 100
Table 6.4 depicts that among the total 24 members in the affected families, eight are married and 16 are unmarried. No widows/widowers and divorcees are included among the affected population.
Family Pattern All the affected families are nuclear families. Table 6.4 Educational Attainment of Project Affected Persons
Description Frequency Percent
Up to 5th standard 1 4.16
Degree 20 83.33
PG 3 12.5
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road 33
Total 24 100
Table 6.4 reveals about the information regarding the educational attainment of the project affected persons in the area. 20 members attained graduation, three members have a post graduate education, and one is studying in primary class.
6.3 Income and Poverty Level All the six affected families belong to APL section based on the classification by Public Distribution System. Table 6.5 Family Monthly Income
Description (Amount in Rs) No of families
15001-30000 3
Information not revealed 3
Total 6
Out of the six affected families, three families are earning monthly income in between 15001-30000 (in Rs). The rest of the three families have not revealed information about their income.
Table 6.6 Occupational Pattern and Non-Working status of Project Affected Persons Occupational Pattern No of family members Percent
Business/trade 3 12.5
Government Sector 1 4.2
Private sector 5 20.8
Self employment 1 4.2
Dependants 14 58.3
Total 24 100 Among the total of 24 affected persons, 14 ie 58.3% of the members are dependants who are either students or elderly. Three members are engaged in
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road 34
business activities for their livelihood measures. Five members are employed in the private sector, one member is employed in the government sector, and one member is self-employed.
6.4 Vulnerable Group Among the total 24 affected persons in the area, the vulnerable population consists of 11 women, two children, and six elderly individuals.
6.5 Land Use and Livelihood The affected properties are all open land and except few coconut trees no other agricultural activities are undertaking in the area. The land owned by Hexatech Developers (Pvt) Ltd and Nippon Realters (Pvt) Ltd was proposed to be used for the purpose of starting a Private Integrated IT and High Tech Park and the project was sanctioned by Department of Information Technology, Government of Kerala as per the order issued GO(MS)No.10/2013/ITD dated 03/09/2013. The project was then withdrawn as the said property being divided into two parts for the construction of Moolampilly-Pizhala Bridge. The access to the property is hindered due to the elevation of the bridge, and hence the implementation of IT and High Tech Park becomes unfeasible. Presently, no families are residing in the project area, so there is no direct impact on their housing or livelihood. Among the affected families, two families shared that they had been engaged in coconut farming and prawn farming in the project area and that it was an income source for that families at that time. During the construction of the International Container Transshipment Terminal Road project, the said land was acquired, and the families lost that income source. The family shared that for that acquisition, they received only an insufficient compensation as per the then existing Government Rules. The family disclosed that there is a dispute existing on this issue in the court. Hexatech Developers (Pvt) Ltd and Nippon Realters (Pvt) Ltd purchased the property in the affected area and was aiming to start a project visualizing employment for 2,30,000 people ( as per the copy of project report received from the respondents).
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road 35
CHAPTER 7 SOCIAL IMPACT MANAGEMENT PLAN
7.1 Approaches to Mitigation The Social Impact Management Plan (SIMP) has been prepared to mitigate negative social impacts of the acquisition of land for Moolampilly-Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road according to RTFCT in LARR Act 2013. The Social Impact Management Plan (SIMP) consists of a set of mitigation, monitoring and institutional measures to be taken during the design, construction and operational phases of the project to eliminate adverse social impacts or to reduce them to acceptable levels. The main aim of the SIMP is to ensure that the various adverse impacts are mitigated and the positive impacts are enhanced. The SIMP shall be implemented during various stages of the project viz. pre-construction stage, construction stage and operational stage. A description of the various management measures for the various social impacts of the project is provided in Table 1.1.
7.2 Measures to avoid mitigate and compensate impact 1. Provisions of compensation for the land acquisition under the RTFCT in LARR Act, 2013 shall be enough to mitigate impacts regarding loss of land. 2. Care to be taken during project planning and implementation that a proper access is left out for the remaining property. 3. For 2 families, this is second acquisition for a public purpose and one among them is losing his total land in the project area. Even if these two acquisitions were for different projects but for public causes, a humanitarian consideration is suggested.
7.3. Measures those are included in the terms of Rehabilitation and Resettlement Compensation as outlined in the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 shall be provided to the affected family.
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road 36
7.4. Measures that the Requiring Body has stated it will introduce in the Project Proposal Sufficient fund has been reserved for payment of compensation to the affected title holders.
7.5. Alterations to project design and additional measures that may be required to address the extend and intensity of impacts across various groups as identified during the Social Impact Assessment process Not Applicable
7.6. Detailed Mitigation Plan Not Applicable
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road 37
CHAPTER 8 SOCIAL IMPACT MANAGEMENT PLAN INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
8.1 Institutional Structures and Key Persons RTFCT in LARR Act, 2013 defines the Administrator appointed by the State Government as the person responsible for the Preparation of Rehabilitation and Resettlement Scheme for the affected families of Land Acquisition. Subject to the superintendence, directions, and control of the appropriate Government and the Commissioner for Rehabilitation and Resettlement, the formulation, execution, and monitoring of the Rehabilitation & Resettlement Scheme shall be vested in the Administrator. In the proposed Moolampilly-Pizhala Bridge and approach road Project, the major mitigation measures from the acquisition can be handled by providing the appropriate compensation under the RTFCT in LARR Act, 2013.
As per G.O. (Ms) No.485/2015/RD, dated 23/09/2015, The Kerala State Policy for Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition,
The District Level Fair Compensation, Resettlement and Resettlement Committee comprising : District Collector, Administrator for resettlement and rehabilitation, Land Acquisition officer, Finance Officer, Representatives of the requiring body to take financial decisions on its behalf, Representatives of a local self government institution
(Note: Since no one resides in the area, no rehabilitation is required)
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road 38
CHAPTER 9 SOCIAL IMPACT MANAGEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING OF MITIGATION PLAN
9.1. Costs of all resettlement and rehabilitation costs Not Applicable
9.2. Annual budget and plan of action Not Applicable
9.3. Funding sources with breakup Not Applicable
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road 39
CHAPTER 10 SOCIAL IMPACT MANAGEMENT PLAN MONITORING AND EVALUATION
10.1 Key Monitoring and Evaluative indicators Not Applicable
10.2 Reporting mechanisms and monitoring roles Not Applicable
10.3 Plan of independent evaluation Not Applicable
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road 40
CHAPTER 11 ANALYSIS OF COSTS AND BENEFITS AND RECOMMENDATION ON ACQUISITION
Since no persons are residing /operating in the project affected area, there will not be any rehabilitation necessary for the project. When completed, this road would connect the highly isolated small islands such as Moolampilly, Pizhala, Kadamakkudy, and Chathanad in Ezhikkara and Kadamakkudy Panchayaths in the Vembanad backwater system with each other and with the mainland.
The project is treated as a public purpose under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (30 of 2013) Section 2(1)b(i). Considering the public advantage and interest, and treating the project as a need, the project shall be implemented.
Social Impact Assessment – Land Acquisition for Moolamilly –Pizhala Bridge and Approach Road 41
15th Aug. 2017] COMMISSIONERATE OF LAND REVENUE 7053 © Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073 dated 5-9-2012 with RNI d o g Government of Kerala Reg. No. KL/TV(N)/634/2015-17 2017
KERALA GAZETTE
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
2017 oo 15 15 th August 2017 * h o e y o 6 1192 30 30th Karkadakam 1192 33 Vol. VI Thiruvananthapuram, No. i Tuesday 1939 24 24th Sravana 1939
PART III Commissionerate of Land Revenue
Gaz. No. 33/2017/DTP (CLR). 73 15th Aug. 2017] COMMISSIONERATE OF LAND REVENUE 7054
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT Form No. 4 e ^ o o o 4 [Nee Rule 11 (3)] [n §o 11 (3) aow ja] notification No. C4-2414/2017. 9th July 2017. kl4-24i4/20i7. 2017 Pqaae 9. GAfflg k d ° O $ 9-12-2015-ae 2753-mo e i® f Wh er ea s, the Government of Kerala have in AkO[Q®OT fflrngl— ]®kya
]lge ]oe Mla,®)oOO 6 eooul a,®)o OO mldmom^ilmjeh^l Bhiyajo^emo, Bhiyaj^oeb And Whereas, in exercise of the powers conferred in °oaaem o, Pl^o e_Q^>yaoijk>OT>lmoejo; sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition 2 0 1 3 - a e eqal F a g S j° e " l — myoraao® Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013 (Central Act 30 m js]®1io®^ro1mjo kjxo®yxb°jo ]jm®a5lhOk0ilmjo of 2013), Government of Kerala have decided to conduct ]jm 8^miO]m0 ilmjaj^ AhiOi B ig (2013-a e eaiffl a Social Impact Assessment in the area specified in the B i g 30) 4-0o h ijn (1)-0o g]hijn|1ae hyh^mrnA Schedule below. °mjkyxaobl Pl^o igisd, xoag ]§libl— ]objd ^mie0> a®j koaqiy i]xyoLOX ajlebl®j^ro— ]omo Now, Therefore, sanction is accorded to the District m sM jmxIm xO®jaom1®jl®1°jkx1mo—; Level Social Impact Assessment Unit, Rajagiri College of Social Sciences, Rajagiri P. O., Kalamassery, Ernakulam C e^o^, X^aqeo P l^ o x e k o a q iy (,]®yoLOffl District to conduct a Social Impact Assessment Study and h1eb1®j^ro— bjmlgob ®osm1®1 eioegP aok to prepare a Social Impact Management Plan as ekO jy — k b ^ k , ®osrnl®1 ]l. a., igae»®1 F d M O ]\a« rnlwao *mj»orn1«jm ®1x1blej^ provided in the Act, the process shall be completed within koaqiy i]xyoLOX ]omo ms^rojdXlmjo koaqiy a period of two months, not exceeding six months in tdfflycLOffl m ld^im ffigoooMjmrnlmjo any case. Njaxeansj^ro1bl®1°jdj. cu i]dlo ®ks aokmlmio Schedule ]jd^ro1bOc°^xom. a®j io®mhioejo 6 aok^Pl— District—Ernakulam. Taluk—Kanayannur. iJSJhO^ ]QS3SBXe. Village—Kadamakkudy. Block— 1. ] § l i Pl^—Fomoijgo. xoeq°—imbkqd. (The extent given is approximate) oile^P—isa°js1. e^Q«" m°d— 1. Sl. Re-survey No./ Extent in No. Sub Division No. Description K Are Sq. M. (G ie zi hlkrol^^aom m—ilbl®1°jk>x) olmSoy \°S / a lh kxlS rn o 617) 1 514/3 Nilam 0.0629 ajlaam o ( o i l s o l —) \ ° S 2 515/8 ,, 0.0926 1 514/3 m leo 0.0629 3 516/3 ,, 0.0007 2 515/8 ,, 0.0926 4 516/4 ,, 0.0434 3 516/3 ,, 0.0007 5 516/7 ,, 0.0378 4 516/4 ,, 0.0434 6 516/10 ,, 0.0763 5 516/7 ,, 0.0378 6 516/10 ,, 0.0763 7 516/11 ,, 0.1325 7 516/11 ,, 0.1325 8 516/12 ,, 0.0653 8 516/12 ,, 0.0653 9 516/14 ,, 0.0229 9 516/14 ,, 0.0229 10 531/1 Nilam Nikathu 0.0354 10 531/1 mleomli^roj 0.0354 Purayidam ]J®blSo 11 531/2 ]J®blSo 0.0257 11 531/2 Purayidam 0.0257 12 283/3 mleo 0.0132 12 282/3 Nilam 0.0132 B a i 0.6087 Total 0.6087
(an ) (Sd.) Pl^O ifiS d . District Collector.
166 Go£90o D(lll(3 4
(n J § o 11(3) cft>36rrc)<&>)
09)14-2414/17 0)1(32)0)1- 09.07.2017
GdftiOg 093(3(96)9(3 0 9 .1 2 .2 0 1 5 6)£1 2 7 5 3 - ) o 09011(3 Gc9>063 (31909)10)90609
0)09)^1(33 aJOOD^OcLj^OralQa) 0 4 .1 2 .2 0 1 5 6)£1 09).g(09)90)906TT)) 09091(3
649/2015/(1.(11,(ill 2?613)9oJD (o_J(9>90o 2013 6)£1 (gffll rg$6)$§(96)£llo3 0)^900)2902)
D n9^ aJ(d1 af)9(3 013)1 OOo Cr\) 0)9(9^ (3)Cg)o rg0900)1(11909) (3T3)1(T3o rgDS091£9rUD(913)103(563<3
(319(1109)903 019)(9}° (2013 6)£J Gc9>(g3 OTC)^, 3 0 ) (o_| eft. 901$ <3(3 c9><3 (T)1(3(UaDlo963(U9(T3 rg)061D9c93<3o ^1.09)1.01)1.o{j) 6)oJ9dl3o(lll£) 6)09)0*1^03 (3) aT)09)1(33(396)0 (DlCQ)ffl1^flo1c063OT)(3)1O99GJo, 6DGO)96)S9o-|(56363 nJ§1d9>Q2)1o3 (lf l(U O l^ jl^ § § (§21 63(33 6)oJ9RD (3T9)(U09^(3T3)1(T)1 0190)902)0)° ^£101/1 (363l-o_fl (BO9(U)l6)O|0qjo 0)1(3 2)2)96119 (313)1(13 60161931 (31^0103^6)611560119, (319)(1103^(561119602)(96)96)(2)60119, 8/1^19 (9><3(§}(3(96)° 6611190)^29(03(ID 0)lD 9 £ J o , 2013 6)£J (gffll a(j}6)g§c05)£llo3 ^902)2902) D o9^ oJO lnD 90(313)103o 0\)O)9O^(9)Cg)o a j DO 0)1(11909)(313)1(13o ngDS(19t£9aJD(919)1(13(5<363 (319(11(9)903 019) (§ / (2013 6>£1 6(9)(Q3 (319)30) 4 - ) 0 (Dcfor^f (1) - ) 0 goJOlc&aJlOEJ (11^01 (TOD(ft.C/3(95)0309)(3)29(0)1, Sjfl^jO (9>§c^ (3 (9)96) (id £102)1(33(313)03 aJOCDo DS(313)(1D(3)1d ° (5)1O329D1-qJ1q1(9630DO)1D9O3. ^6rLj903, OXlS^Elo 82l^J9(3)£1 (TUO^nO^ (oJOI^O^OO) (ill£102)1(33013)03 0^6TDl$9Q2) 09S3(/)1o1 Gc9.9G<382° 639o£° 609)90*1^03 01)02)03(11)°, O9^(/)1o1.o_11.0, (0j<32G(/gOl n 0 O D (TU£9oJD6)(313) (1)1(32)20 (3190303901)1 (963(ID O l (3)102)1 £ J § § O D O ^n O ^ (g_|0)pfteJ9(5) nJODo DSOT3) (ID (3)1(130 ODl^oD^ (oJO)p«£J9(5) Dl(3qjor)6TD oJfli)(3)1 (3)(5)909(953(ID(3)103o oJ2(3)£16)a_]§013)lQ2)1o1(963010. <3999 (oJ(rf))lQ2) 06113° 2 9 (ID (313)1 D (9.0 o j(3(313)102)96c96)6113(3)9601°. 63(33 (9>9O61D(U039£Jo 6 2909)013)1(33 ^§(11903 o J9 § g § (3 )^ j. (3)0£ye96)1 eft STD (Q) (TO) (3 n£)O6TD0cftgo OflCB^j^l eft>S(2c963Sl. (n^cft,G3aoo 0/10^1(36^(20^- (DC(33 ail cnj1c3 6TT)o (d3>(2 (B6T^0c9Sf (Do. o 1(t u (3o o j (Do. (lfl(U06TDo C0) 6TD (Do. aro6Df (QoDe^OloS) (U)l(l/lo3d(T3 (Do. 1 1 514/3 (DlEJo 0 .0 6 2 9 2 1 515/8 (DlEJo 0 .0 9 2 6 3 1 516/3 (DlEJo 0.0007 4 1 516/4 (DlEJo 0 .0 4 3 4 5 1 516/7 (DlEJo 0.0378 6 1 516/10 (DlEJo 0.0763 7 1 516/11 (DlEJo 0.1325 8 1 516/12 (DlEJo 0 .0 6 5 3 9 1 516/14 (DlEJo 0.0 22 9 10 1 531/1 (d De jo arfldftorm 0 .0 3 5 4 rgracnflso 11 1 531/2 ngOQ3)1So 0.0257 12 1 2 8 3 /3 (DlEJo 0.0132 (3Td) 0 eft 0.6087 ssl^jo cft.gc^(3 2«3T3)raa/la3i^jeftoroo 6)(U)o_H§l oftg^t3^(^)(O3.n0) FORM No.4 (See Rule 11(3) C4-2414/17 Dated:09.07.2017 WHEREAS, the Government of Kerala have in Notification No.649/2015/Rev,dated 09/12/2015 appointed the Special Tahsildar (LA) GCDA, Ernakulam to perform the functions of a Collector for the purpose of land acquisition under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013. WHEREAS, it appears to the Government of Kerala that the said land specified in the schedule below is needed or likely to be needed for a public purpose to wit for Moolampilly Pizhala Bridge. AND WHEREAS, in exercise of the powers conferred in sub section (1) of Section 4 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013 (Central Act 30 of 2013), Government of Kerala have decided to conduct a Social Impact Assessment in the area specified in the Schedule below. NOW, THEREFORE, sanction is accorded to the District Level Social Impact Assessment Unit, Rajagiri College of Social Sciences, Rajagiri.P.O, Kalamassery, Ernakulam District to conduct a Social Impact Assessment Study and to prepare a Social Impact Management Plan as provided in the Act, the process shall be completed within a period of two months, not exceeding six months in any case. District Collector SCHEDULE Taluk : Kanayannur District: Ernakulam Village: Kadamakkudy (The extent given is approximate) Sl.No Block No. ResurveyNo. / Description Extent Sub Division No. H.Are.Sq.m 1 1 514/3 Nilam 0.0629 2 1 515/8 Nilam 0.0926 3 1 516/3 Nilam 0.0007 4 1 516/4 Nilam 0.0434 5 1 516/7 Nilam 0.0378 6 1 516/10 Nilam 0.0763 7 1 516/11 Nilam 0.1325 8 1 516/12 Nilam 0.0653 9 1 516/14 Nilam 0.0229 10 1 531/1 Nilam Nikathu 0.0354 Purayidam 11 1 531/2 Purayidam 0.0257 12 1 282/3 Nilam 0.0132 0.6087 (Sd/-) District Collector. Forwarded by Order Sl-17 OR OUP K DISTRICT ERNAKULAM TALUK KANAYANOOR VILLAGE K\DAMAKUDY Ulm;llilUil.|l.i||lpliii;HJl|piliil.t DISTRICT ERNAKULAM TALUK :KANAYANOOR VILLAGE : KADAMAKUDY -2-80 283 1 4 « 63.2 Sy>y/t> • <2 8 ^ , I f Kj C ^ b is) C^uJ^u[iy Syrft\ £ f j g g r 277 L^has £>1 (Vcyj HOTA.TI jdp&tftfn^wri Survey i />«W PtcoriU ! 1 Socio Economic Survey for Social Impact Assessment Study Land Acquisition for Construction of Moolampilly-Pizhala Bridge Approach Road , Ernakulam District SIA Ref No Interviewer’s Name Survey Date Supervisor Name Data Entry Staff’ Name Data Entered Date Data verified by, and Date Respondent’s name Name of the affected person (if different from above) Address including PINCODE (Location in the Affected Area) Contact (Landline No) Contact No (Mobile No) Identity Card Details (any one id proof) Aadhaar No Ration Card No Passport No Voters Id Place/ Location Q.1 Identification Ward No. Name of Panchayath Q.2Respondent Owner Representative of Owner Q.2 Name & Address of Representative Owner the Respondent of Owner ASSET DETAILS Q. 3 Type of property Open Land Nilam Nilam Nikathu Purayidam 3 Social Impact Assessment – Moolampilly-Pizhala Bridge Approach Road (SIA Unit, Rajagiri College of Social Sciences , Kalamassery) 2 Q.4 Type of use Open Land Wet Land (Agricultural Land) Others (specify) Q.6Name of title holder of the property (specify the names of all the members specified as per the title deed) a) Communication Address (with PINCODE) b) Contact No c) Relationship with family head Hereditary Purchase d) Acquisition by Encroached/squatter Others (specify) ______e) Date of acquiring of the property (approx period) f) Details of transactions made on the property within the last three years Q. 9 Property Details a) Survey No (Mandatory) b) Total Area (in hectares) c) Area Affected (in hectares) In case of more than one property please use additional pages IMPACT Q.10 Extent of acquisition Fully Partially Q.11Whether property viable after implementation of project Yes No Q.VULNERABILITY Q.17Do you have Ration Yes No If Yes,Mention Number card? ______Q.18Type of Ration card BPL APL AAY GENERAL INFORMATION Q.23Size of Family/household Male Female (specify no of family members) Social Impact Assessment – Moolampilly-Pizhala Bridge Approach Road (SIA Unit, Rajagiri College of Social Sciences , Kalamassery) 3 Family Pattern Join t Nuclear Individual Q.19Religious group Hindu 1 Muslim 2 Christians 3 Jain 4 Others 9 Q.20Social Group SC 1 ST 2 OBC 3 General 4 Others 9 FAMILY MEMBERS - DETAILS Sl. Name Relatio Age Sex Marital Education Job Mont Major No nship Status hly diseas . with Inco es the me Head Complete contin uing of the d family Q.35Livelihood (Major Source of Income) of Family Affected Yes No Q.36Family income & source a)Family monthly income (in Rs) b)Family monthly expenditure (in Rs) c) Major source of income d) No of adult earning members e) No of dependents Project Related Information Q.50.Are you aware of the proposed Moolampilly – Yes No Pizhala Bridge approach Road project Social Impact Assessment – Moolampilly-Pizhala Bridge Approach Road (SIA Unit, Rajagiri College of Social Sciences , Kalamassery) 4 Q.51.If yes, source of information Newspaper Internet/social media TV/ Media Community members All of the above Other (specify) Q.52.What is the positive or other impacts envisaged from this project development Positive impacts perceived Other perceived impacts Increase in employment opportunities Loss of productive land for agriculture due to better access facilities Increase in movement in terms of facility Pressure on existing infrastructure and frequency Increase in economic and business Conflict with outsiders activities Increase in land prices Increase in the density around the project area Improvement in the real estate sector Increased spread of communicable diseases and other vulnerabilities Better reach/access to larger towns Increase in rentals for tenants for both (health/education) residential and commercial properties Higher income from rental due to this Others (specify)______infrastructure development Others(specify)______ Q.53REHABILITATION OPTIONS a) Owner Equivalent / better productive land What is preferred rehabilitation Cash compensation at replacement value measure Training for income restoration Other (specify) ______ Additional information Social Impact Assessment – Moolampilly-Pizhala Bridge Approach Road (SIA Unit, Rajagiri College of Social Sciences , Kalamassery) EKM 2017 «(fi)CSD6nJ(t) 28 090)1 C ^ )a ild 9 > croS(flbDg(boail(iJ: (BraeoJ :i Ph:09790330296 ra»sanwj) mkderoti nr 42ovii®«>Sirdr 03.11.201 (id) vSiibw snnOo noodleipdk»o nWOKRiasi. .atoe^iecfltiag •toja n.in# "R7777T5T5555 R1 710-355424 rU03Oo-5 a J § o 14 (1) <9l>36rO;a> G ( D 3 § 1 ( r C mailed l/SIA-PZA/2017 ra>1cn>ra)l: 23.10.2017 3 n(j)06mo<8>22 a algjoailrad cft6mcQ) 358 10 1 531/1 mleio cr>l 1 531/1 11 onlejo cpltaramj 0.0250 raramlrai n®eilm)6niraidi. UKDarualad ail^j eotno nJJCOOQllSo njo§ruomilrad ails, A sm m o s, (JAoraios 1 531/2 12 rUjracmlSo 0.0257 raigin^crolejlnd aaocrono. njm 13 1 283/23 mleio 0.0132 ( i ) snidenj^ oactdsS, rajjralcglgijrad anmeni,; (ti^i 6)aJO(D)3QJO(5(DTD) )1 m )1 ojgldBo: (pj(0)1m )crujl STROOCrf! ojgl<8)(D)OCQ)OSJo ClilffiCDlO (ssjo OaJ(8ai5 roqgoooceola)) cs 611300(3) (O)Qg/OOOc06)lCD) aj§l aOOOo-5 aJ§o 14 (1) <9>35TOJ«0> G )1(o8 i*e>a ol cn>(8 aqj ail (lira m o ail 0)5 (m ia^o / rrunoi Q s n & i f b / norm <3 (tktii(8 marii(8/ •^<02 aoodo 8J><3) aJ (B oamitamS affooidBionfloaT emeuojaiilaii ft O(W^O (iC O O o -5 n J § o 14 (1) a>3Smjc9. G 0 D D § 1 ( r U montd 1/SIA-PZA/2017 (mlCD)(0)1: 23.10.2017 afl)O 6 TD0 «flij@o s1^jco)1(o3 <6i6mcQKm2(3 (O)oeJ2 t0 6 )l 6 )ej (0) m2 g i aiflggl-rul v g i a)OG)(aio)l6)(i§ai)2o tore a^ email) coonjuleHT^oujo 0)1(3m oem(orola)}amens! rarajOK/a^mj 6)6713000)0 (BTSaiUDjmj 67130 Oai>c86)06)me(TT)0 o l a o r i S e o j L * m 061jy0 006) (l/l 01(3 61DO n/1 on? (0)1(3 e p ^ o / arxioej gsBdfcad/ (D (iu (3 0 )0 1 1 (3 (D (n i(d / a ® (feOOUOo CD) (D) n J (0 c9o c 0 iiil c9i ^ ^ 6) S GnJCO (70 671jf 01)1 (l/l (313) (11 03 WB) S O nH(l3 0)011(3 @2 ml 6) o f ) (£b s<3 1 1 5 1 4 / 3 (7)16)0 0 . 0 6 2 9 1. 6)an(0b (70005(03 (U)0JG10aJ»(TO (6>Q(.nJ.) 5 1 5 / 8 2 1 (7)1 Glo 0 . 0 9 2 6 G i l m l g a u o ojd o (3 man(3 CCXL/242 5 1 6 / 3 3 1 o il e io 0 . 0 0 0 7 em ooD O a D 0 (dm, Gioano c o o m ? , a ® n e m o 5 1 6 / 4 4 1 aril e j o 0 . 0 4 3 4 (83220-682011 5 1 5 1 6 / 7 0)1 G lO 0 . 0 3 7 8 5 1 6 / 1 0 6 1 0)1 GlO 0 . 0 7 6 3 2 . (riloajoeiri rilai 5 3 1 / 1 1 0 1 0)1 Glo 0)1(83(010)2 0 . 0 1 0 4 (313GJ68b(1)5 OeJOOTUaD al(I)(8 6 )(0 3 a O D d l? s o c d o aJ2<3Q0)1So 2)2 GI 01)1 gjill, 6)603O.ajl-682O27 5 3 1 / 1 11 1 0)1 Glo 0)1(83(010)2 0 . 0 2 5 0 (373(1)1(0) a® 6/1(11) 671X017), 0 £90(70 m1(l3 5 3 1 / 2 12 1 aJ2 2 8 3 / 2 3 1 3 1 0 )1 Glo 0 . 0 1 3 2 ( 1 ) 6mo6njj O930(de$, c032ffl1($l803(o3 anm m ?, m ^2 asO(8G a®.aj o o o o jd , 6)6)(nrilGi, G(830ajl-19, ( 2 ) omoanod 0830(363 ^ffllt/Ol ai(o3 anmoro, an,} o s o s a a ® ^ o o o o ju , <>6101)1(13-5, 6)6)(liglGl, 0(830^)1-19. ( 3 ) 611/1 anOaUlo, aGgO$ m (111(3 13 a ® , o® (8 3 (70 (,a)(1l5 a® 0(J^^, a®.6)83. anogld) (TOmlalo, <836)2(8 - 6)6030 a j l - 19. <63 a j) 6)aJ0D(30(iJ LIST OF PARTICIPANTS SL.NO. NAME & ADDRESS PHONE NO. SIGNATURE 1 1 LQ. f^'Vv'UTvv' L sn i - ^ r " 2 f $ M v G ? m .6 Ku/LlZlriKtft 9 W 3 3 J 1 0 Z(3"C /v A W l (< 0 ^ 7 1 -/^ 7 /w -VT' A'X4AaA ^ 4 % < £ $ * & $ & !> t A > ______\ aZj^Jr)/i— [Dv/— ^ iCOC#-/ i /^i(lsu/i/^ A?\Jj> ^y S, P a j^ a J ^ 0^ A ^ V M------/r y ^ S p s f t Z ) C r f ^ (¥ -3 . '.: Av)>'(.P>iP' .HcJyize. • - \ ^'r\/U» i ' JLi y 7 \f)\T) C-'VvNTt <2- (c\) Qnxvote G <£\) SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY MOOLAMPILLY-PIZHALA BRIDGE & APPROACH ROAD PUBLIC HEARING AT MONICA HALL - ST.AUGUSTINE'S CHURCH , MOOLAMPILLY ON 15.11.2017 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS SL.NO. NAME & ADDRESS PHONE NO. SIGNATURE % (Tf 4 5 i ' " ^ j ' 6 1 D4" K • M • <^//V D LHJ 1 OiAJ^x/ (y$L^n r-LC\. j 1 V " A\OV9G/>->l^','<2' G QcO OTityai^ywto G> (VcO SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY MOOLAMPILLY - PIZHALA BRIDGE & APPROACH ROAD PUBLIC HEARING AT MONICA HALL - ST.AUGUSTINE'S CHURCH , MOOLAMPILLY ON 15.11.2017 LIST OF OFFICIALS SL.NO. NAME & ADDRESS PHONE NO. SIGNATURE 1 1^ - H - C m ^ K K V v l — H*.cb-°mcJl<\My §0 4 9 7 ( 4 1 7 4 Ixo fvuSucA-Mw- - M * JL . 3. ! vvjj»e^-W. Q c o e M 1 1 / S ci Olo W Td^U tv fe) / T? fT'A sK TV v^Mp^dJ^I 1 rf-p- C/0$e p / fe )sW - J2veyfi£{£>^ + W j f P O S / w _____ v/ k $ c t , e t y A] - A -, w l 4 / A f ; if 6 J ^ t Z . * $•/ .r> cM pH *- C^vy ) Cm chi, fa » A V Lrz^na, vlnars ^ p p C f f ^ T f MnrMOOLAMPILLY - PIZHALA BRIDGE & APPROACH ROAD PUBLIC HEARING ON 15.11.2017 LIST OF OFFICIALS SL.NO. NAME & ADDRESS PHONE NO. SIGNATURE 1 1f t °\ -ic> rpxH ruj O ' i W n cfk h b i \ s m id J T i^ C i 0 \JlO A ^ L ?'0) i) t / E ( U fo n F ^6 £56 S lC G o Kscc, G buU n/1 IcM W M . L f f>^>) ------1— z K - M 6 W d W - i 12> rf&uMj (yf^Anmu Gao A ^ 9 5 ? 556?5 - Annexure 8 - Details of Affected companies/ Families Measurement of Name & Address of the affected Sl.No. Survey No Type of land the acquiring families land in hectares 1 Hexatech Developers (Pvt)Ltd. 514/3 0.0629 Door No.CCXI/242 Bio Pharma 515/8 0.0926 Layam Road 516/3 0.0007 Ernakulam :682001 516/4 0.434 2 516/7 Wet land 0.0378 Nippon Realtors(pvt)Ltd. Door No:10/314 K 516/10 0.0763 Nippon Towers 516/11 0.1325 N.H.47 Bypass Nettoor.P.O. 516/12 0.0653 Maradu : 682304 516/14 0.0229 3 Alex Joseph Panackal House Wet now dry 531/1 (P) 0.0104 Moolampilli land Kochi : 682027 4 Anitha Elizabeth Jasmin Villa Wet now dry 531/1 (P) 0.0250 Pattaparambil House land Kandanad, Kothad 5 Ancilin Joseph Panackal House 531/2 Dry land 0.0257 Moolampilli Kochi : 682027 6 Babu George Kurisinkal House New Toc H Road Vyttila, Kochi-19 7 Mohan George Kurisinkal House 283/3 Wet land 0.0132 New Toc H Road Vyttila, Kochi-19 8 B.Hashim Flat No.13 A Express Estate Near M.J.Hall Kaloor, Kochi-19 c&All 6)S CaJ(8 &■ (TO 60 J (U>1 Oil (91% (U OB^ fflj ga aeni omo3 o)(m<3 s>nr>£ft.s<3 o4i -I )(Oltf ! i 1 514/3 ml eio 0.0629 1. Oao«a» cruoas<& cu)(uejOaj<5cr6 (eei.aj.)! «66>J 2 1 515/8 (1)16)0 0.0926 e/lalgcui 0(Uj5(3 menri CCXL/242 1 516/3 _c9bffl 3 (ril eio 0.0007 >nioTK> oDDcScs, ee