DOCSLIB.ORG

Interim Report of the Working Group on Fisheries Acoustics, Science and Technology (WGFAST)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interim Report of the Working Group on Fisheries Acoustics, Science and Technology (WGFAST) ICES WGFAST 2018 REPORT ECOSYSTEM OBSERVATION STEERING GROUP ICES CM 2018/EOSG:11 REF ACOM AND SCICOM Interim Report of the Working Group on Fisheries Acoustics, Science and Technology (WGFAST) 20-23 March 2018 Seattle, USA International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H. C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2018. Interim Report of the Working Group on Fisheries Acoustics, Science and Technology (WGFAST), 20-23 March 2018, Seattle, USA. ICES CM 2018/EOSG:11. 49 pp. The material in this report may be reused using the recommended citation. ICES may only grant usage rights of information, data, images, graphs, etc. of which it has owner- ship. For other third-party material cited in this report, you must contact the original copyright holder for permission. For citation of datasets or use of data to be included in other databases, please refer to the latest ICES data policy on the ICES website. All ex- tracts must be acknowledged. For other reproduction requests please contact the Gen- eral Secretary. This document is the product of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the view of the Council. © 2018 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Contents Executive summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 1 Administrative details .......................................................................................................... 2 2 Terms of Reference a) – d) ................................................................................................... 3 3 Summary of Work plan ........................................................................................................ 6 4 List of Outcomes and Achievements of the WG in this delivery period .................... 7 5 Progress on ToRs and workplan ........................................................................................ 9 5.1 Progress and fulfillment by ToR .............................................................................. 9 5.1.1 ToR a: Produce a list of papers originating from the community of the WGFAST working group ................................................................... 9 5.1.2 ToR b: Present recent work in fisheries acoustics ...................................... 9 5.1.3 ToR c: Organize training session on use of acoustics for biomass estimation ...................................................................................................... 13 5.1.4 ToR d: Provide guidance for calibrating echosounders on fishing vessels ............................................................................................................ 14 5.1.5 ToR e: Organize joint sessions at ICES ASC ............................................. 14 5.1.6 ToR f: Define a data format for omni fisheries sonars ............................. 14 5.1.7 ToR g: Work towards developing and recommending procedures for collecting and processing quality acoustic data in inclement weather .......................................................................................................... 14 5.1.8 Other ToRs..................................................................................................... 15 5.2 Changes/Edits/Additions to ToR ........................................................................... 16 5.3 Cooperation with other WGs .................................................................................. 16 5.4 Cooperation with Advisory structures .................................................................. 16 5.5 Cooperation with other IGOs ................................................................................. 16 5.6 Science Highlights .................................................................................................... 17 6 Revisions to the work plan and justification ................................................................. 19 7 Next meetings ...................................................................................................................... 20 Annex 1: List of participants..................................................................................................... 21 Annex 2: Recommendations ..................................................................................................... 26 Annex 3: Meeting Agenda ........................................................................................................ 27 Annex 4: Abstract of contributions ......................................................................................... 31 WGFAST 1. Applications of acoustic methods to characterize ecosystems ................. 31 WGFAST 2. Acoustic properties of marine organisms ................................................... 37 WGFAST 3. Behaviour ........................................................................................................ 39 WGFAST 4. Emerging technologies, methodologies, and protocols ............................ 41 Interim Report of the Working Group on Fisheries Acoustics, | 1 Science and Technology (WGFAST) Executive summary The ICES Working Group on Fisheries Acoustics, Science and Technology (WGFAST) is the major international forum where individuals working in fisheries acoustics net- work to discuss ongoing developments in the technique. As such, it is highly success- ful, attracting 91 participants from 18 countries to its meeting in Seattle, USA from 20- 23 March 2018. Highlights The major themes addressed during the WGFAST meeting included: • Behaviour; • Acoustic properties of marine organisms; • Emerging technologies, methodologies, and protocols; • Applications of acoustic methods to characterize ecosystems. A separate session was held for each theme, where the participants first presented the latest results of their work, followed by a discussion. The abstracts and discussion sum- maries are given in the report. The contributions highlighted the wide range of appli- cations of acoustics for ecosystem characterization and monitoring, as well as for abun- dance surveys. Advancing acoustic technology and alternative sampling platforms (e.g. autonomous vehicles, ocean observatories) has led to increases in the volume of acoustic data, which has created challenges for data processing and storage. A discus- sion group was held in association with the WGFAST meeting to discuss development of Python-based and other automated processing and analysis tools. Several presentations highlighted research and increasing applications of acoustic wideband technologies. WGFAST organized a second ICES Training Course on 'Prin- ciples and Methods of Broadband/Wideband Technologies: Application to fisheries acoustics' in December 2017. Wideband systems are expected to replace the current standard narrowband scientific echosounders, but there is a need for future quantita- tive assessment of the impact of this change on abundance surveys. WGFAST proposes a session on “Application of new technologies (e.g. wideband acoustics) for fisheries surveys and ecosystem investigation” for the 2019 ASC conference. WGFAST provided a training course on ‘Introduction to abundance estimation from fisheries acoustic surveys’ in June 2017, and will co-chair theme session J at the 2018 ICES ASC meeting on “Survey data products for stock and ecosystem assessments: challenges and future directions”. A topic group on 'Collecting Quality Underwater Acoustic Data in Inclement Weather’ (TG-QUAD) was held in conjunction with the 2018 WGFAST meeting. 2 | ICES WGFAST 2018 Report 1 Administrative details Working Group name The Working Group on Fisheries, Acoustics, Science and Technology (WGFAST) Year of Appointment within the current three-year cycle 2018 Reporting year concluding the current three-year cycle 2 Chair(s) Richard O’Driscoll, New Zealand Meeting venue(s) and dates Seattle, United States of America 20-23 March 2018 Interim Report of the Working Group on Fisheries Acoustics, | 3 Science and Technology (WGFAST) 2 Terms of Reference a) – d) ToR Description Background Duration Expected Deliverables a Collate information on a) Science Require- 3 Filled in acoustic related re- ments template for search and surveys by WGFAST re- b) Advisory Re- Country represented in port quirements WGFAST b Present recent work Create a venue for 1, 2, 3 Report within the topics “Ap- informing the group plications of acoustic members on recent methods to characterize activities and seek- ecosystems”, “Acoustic ing input to further properties of marine or- development. An ganisms“, “Behaviour“, overview of the dif- and “Emerging technol- ferent contributions ogies, methodologies, will be presented in and protocols“ the annual report c Organize training ses- Introductory course 1 ICES sion on use of acoustics on use of acoustic training for biomass estimation for abundance esti- course mation, including survey design and data analysis d Provide guidance for Fishing vessels in- 1 or 2 Report calibrating echosound- creasingly collect ers on fishing vessels acoustic data. To al- (topic group) low quantitative use of these data, suita- ble calibration pro- cedures for fishing conditions are needed e Organize joint sessions 2 or 3 Topic ses- at ICES ASC
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New and Emerging Technologies for Sustainable Fisheries: a Comprehensive Landscape Analysis
    Photo by Pablo Sanchez Quiza New and Emerging Technologies for Sustainable Fisheries: A Comprehensive Landscape Analysis Environmental Defense Fund | Oceans Technology Solutions | April 2021 New and Emerging Technologies for Sustainable Fisheries: A Comprehensive Landscape Analysis Authors: Christopher Cusack, Omisha Manglani, Shems Jud, Katie Westfall and Rod Fujita Environmental Defense Fund Nicole Sarto and Poppy Brittingham Nicole Sarto Consulting Huff McGonigal Fathom Consulting To contact the authors please submit a message through: edf.org/oceans/smart-boats edf.org | 2 Contents List of Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................7 2. Transformative Technologies......................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Sensors ........................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Satellite remote sensing ...........................................................................................................................12 2.3 Data Collection Platforms ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Using Acoustics to Evaluate the Effect of Fishing on School Characteristics of Walleye Pollock Haixue Shen and Terrance J
    Resiliency of Gadid Stocks to Fishing and Climate Change 125 Alaska Sea Grant College Program • AK-SG-08-01, 2008 Using Acoustics to Evaluate the Effect of Fishing on School Characteristics of Walleye Pollock Haixue Shen and Terrance J. Quinn II University of Alaska Fairbanks, Juneau Center, School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, Juneau, Alaska Vidar Wespestad Resources Analysts International, Lynnwood, Washington Martin W. Dorn Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, Washington Matthew Kookesh University of Alaska Fairbanks, Juneau Center, School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, Juneau, Alaska Abstract Walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) is the target of one of the world’s largest fisheries and is an important prey species in the eastern Bering Sea (EBS) ecosystem. Little is known about the potential effects of fishing on the school characteristics and spatial distribution of walleye pollock. Few dedicated research surveys have been conducted during pollock fishing seasons, so analysis of fishery data is the only feasible approach to study these potential effects. We used acoustic data col- lected continuously by one fishing vessel in January-February 2003, which operated north of Unimak Island. Results from comparisons between two fishing periods showed significant changes of pollock distribution at different scales. The schools were smaller and denser during the second period. Furthermore, the spatial distribution of schools became sparser, as evidenced by the lower frequency of schools per elementary distance sampling unit and the increase in average 126 Shen et al.—School Characteristics of Walleye Pollock next-neighbor distances (NNDs). However, the average NND between schools within a cluster and the average abundance of clusters did not change significantly.
    [Show full text]
  • Underwater Acoustic Fisheries Surveys at Gray's Reef NMS
    Hydroacoustic surveys: A non-destructive approach to monitoring fish distributions at National Marine Sanctuaries NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 66 This report has been reviewed by the National Ocean Service of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for their use by the United States government. Citation for this Report Kracker, L.M. 2007. Hydroacoustic surveys: A non-destructive approach to monitoring fish distributions at National Marine Sanctuaries. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 66. 24 pp. Cover photo credit: Greg McFall. Hydroacoustic surveys: A non-destructive approach to monitoring fish distributions at National Marine Sanctuaries Laura Kracker NOAA, National Ocean Service National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science Center for Coastal Environmental Health and Biomolecular Research 219 Fort Johnson Road Charleston, South Carolina 29412-9110 NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 66 August, 2007 United States Department of National Oceanic and National Ocean Service Commerce Atmospheric AdministrationDRAFT Carlos M. Gutierrez Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr. John (Jack) H. Dunnigan Secretary Administrator Assistant Administrator Laura Kracker Center for Coastal Environmental Health and Biomolecular Research (CCEHBR) National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science (NCCOS) In partnership with Gray’s Reef National Marine Sanctuary Prepared for Greg McFall Research Coordinator Gray’s Reef National
    [Show full text]
  • Underwater Acoustics for Ecosystem-Based Management: State of the Science and Proposals for Ecosystem Indicators
    Vol. 442: 285–301, 2011 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published December 5 doi: 10.3354/meps09425 Mar Ecol Prog Ser OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS REVIEW Underwater acoustics for ecosystem-based management: state of the science and proposals for ecosystem indicators Verena M. Trenkel1,*, Patrick H. Ressler2, Mike Jech3, Marianna Giannoulaki4, Chris Taylor5 1Ifremer, rue de l’île d’Yeu, BP 21105, 44311 Nantes cedex 3, France 2Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, Washington 98115, USA 3Northeast Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, 166 Water St., Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA 4Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Institute of Marine Biological Resources, Gournes, PO Box 2214, Iraklion, Greece 5Center for Coastal Fisheries and Habitat Research, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, National Ocean Service, NOAA, 101 Pivers Island Road, Beaufort, North Carolina 28557, USA ABSTRACT: Ecosystem-based management (EBM) requires more extensive information than single- species management. Active underwater acoustic methods provide a means of collecting a wealth of ecosystem information with high space–time resolution. Worldwide fisheries institutes and agencies are carrying out regular acoustic surveys covering many marine shelf ecosystems, but these data are underutilized. In addition, more and more acoustic data collected by vessels of opportunity are becoming available. To encourage their use for EBM, we provide a brief introduc- tion to acoustic and complementary data collection methods in the water column, and review cur- rent and potential contributions to monitoring population abundance and biomass, spatial distrib- utions, and predator–prey relationships. Further development of acoustics-derived indicators is needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Group on Fisheries Acoustics Science and Technology
    Fisheries Technology Committee ICES CM 2000/B:04 REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON FISHERIES ACOUSTICS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Ijmuiden/Haarlem, Netherlands 10–14 April 2000 This report is not to be quoted without prior consultation with the General Secretary. The document is a report of an expert group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer Palægade 2–4 DK–1261 Copenhagen K Denmark TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1 TERMS OF REFERENCE .........................................................................................................................................1 2 MEETING AGENDA AND APPOINTMENT OF RAPPORTEUR.........................................................................1 3 SESSION A “FISH AVOIDANCE” ..........................................................................................................................1 3.1 G. Arnold Fish avoidance and fisheries acoustics ...........................................................................................1 3.2 P. Fernandes An investigation of fish avoidance using an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle........................2 3.3 F. Gerlotto Some observations on fish avoidance in several seas ...................................................................2 3.4 C. Wilson Consideration in the analysis of acoustic buoy data to investigate fish avoidance.........................2
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing Nature in Fisheries Research : the Use of Underwater
    Aquatic Living Resources 16 (2003) 107–112 www.elsevier.com/locate/aquliv Foreword Introducing nature in fisheries research: the use of underwater acoustics for an ecosystem approach of fish population The changes in environmental conditions require an “eco- biomass, or more directly establishing total allocated catches system approach” be adopted when considering fish popula- (TACs) based on the stock biomass. However, in many cases tions. This new approach implies the design of new concepts the contribution of fisheries acoustics remained limited. and hypotheses including knowledge on ecology, behaviour Eventually we are entering a new era, which is based upon and fisheries. Being able to observe in real time and in three two observations. dimensions the living organisms and their environment be- • It is now recognised that fisheries activity in the world comes essential. These are precisely the capabilities of un- has reached and most probably exceeded its maximum derwater acoustics, which is going to play a major role in sustainable yield (Pauly et al., 2002; Myers and Worm, aquatic ecology research. 2003). • The failures of stock management in many cases have demonstrated that the study of a fish stock indepen- 1. Introduction dently from its biology and behaviour, and more gener- ally from the ecosystem where this stock is living, usu- Based on pioneer works in the 1950s by Schaefer (1954), ally lead to erroneous conclusions on its status. Beverton and Holt (1957), Gulland (1969), Fox (1970), These two observations have oriented towards new among others, fisheries biology and its associated models of thoughts in fisheries biology, and to the conclusion that the the dynamics of populations represented a huge step forward understanding of stock dynamics would require an ecosys- in the analysis and monitoring of exploited fish populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Developments In; Fisheries Acoustics
    Rapp. P.-v. Réun. Cons. int. Explor. Mer, 189: 123-127. 1990 Day and night fish distribution pattern in the net mouth area of the Norwegian bottom-sampling trawl Arill Engås and Egil Ona Engås, Arill, and Ona, Egil. 1990. Day and night fish distribution pattern in the net mouth area of the Norwegian bottom-sampling trawl. - Rapp. R-v. Réun. Cons. int. Explor. Mer, 189: 123—127. A high-frequency scanning sonar, mounted as a net sonde, was used to study fish behaviour in the'mouth area of the Norwegian bottom-sampling trawl. Fish distribu­ tion patterns were significantly different by day and night. At night the fish entered the middle of the trawl, close to the bobbins, and no fish were observed escaping over the headline. During daytime the fish entered more irregularly, using the whole opening of the trawl, and haddock were lost over the headline. The daytime sonar observations were confirmed visually with an underwater vehicle with video camera. The observations indicate that the herding process during bottom trawling may be equally efficient by day and night, and that hearing must play a significant role in this process under non-visual conditions. Arill Engås: Institute o f Fisheries Technology Research, P.O. Box 1964, Nordnes, N-5024 Bergen, Norway. Egil Ona: Institute of Marine Research. P.O. Box 1870, Nordnes, N-5024 Bergen, Norway. non-visual conditions, with the fish showing less orien­ Introduction tation relative to the ground gear than in the daytime. If The Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway, has the reaction to the trawl varies with the ambient light carried out combined bottom-trawl and acoustic surveys level, this may also affect the sampling efficiency of the on the stocks of Northeast Arctic cod and haddock in trawl.
    [Show full text]
  • Machine Learning to Improve Marine Science for the Sustainability of Living Ocean Resources Report from the 2019 Norway - U.S
    NOAA Machine Learning to Improve Marine Science for the Sustainability of Living Ocean Resources Report from the 2019 Norway - U.S. Workshop NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-199 November 2019 Machine Learning to Improve Marine Science for the Sustainability of Living Ocean Resources Report from the 2019 Norway - U.S. Workshop Edited by William L. Michaels, Nils Olav Handegard, Ketil Malde, Hege Hammersland-White Contributors (alphabetical order): Vaneeda Allken, Ann Allen, Olav Brautaset, Jeremy Cook, Courtney ​ ​ ​ S. Couch, Matt Dawkins, Sebastien de Halleux, Roger Fosse, Rafael Garcia, Ricard Prados Gutiérrez, ​ Helge Hammersland, Hege Hammersland-White, William L. Michaels, Kim Halvorsen, Nils Olav ​ ​ ​ Handegard, Deborah R. Hart, Kine Iversen, Andrew Jones, Kristoffer Løvall, Ketil Malde, Endre Moen, ​ ​ Benjamin Richards, Nichole Rossi, Arnt-Børre Salberg, , Annette Fagerhaug Stephansen, Ibrahim Umar, ​ ​ ​ Håvard Vågstøl, Farron Wallace, Benjamin Woodward November 2019 NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-199 U.S. Department National Oceanic and National Marine Of Commerce Atmospheric Administration Fisheries Service Wilbur L. Ross, Jr. Neil A. Jacobs, PhD Christopher W. Oliver Secretary of Commerce Acting Under Secretary of Commerce Assistant Administrator for Oceans and Atmosphere for Fisheries and NOAA Administrator Recommended citation: Michaels, W. L., N. O. Handegard, K. Malde, and H. Hammersland-White (eds.). 2019. Machine learning to improve marine science for the sustainability of living ocean resources: Report from the 2019 Norway - U.S. Workshop. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-F/SPO-199, 99 p. ​ ​ ​ ​ Available online at https://spo.nmfs.noaa.gov/tech-memos/ The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS, or NOAA Fisheries) does not approve, recommend, or endorse any proprietary product or proprietary material mentioned in the publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Acoustic Biomass of Fish Associated with an Oil and Gas Platform
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Louisiana State University Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2013 Acoustic biomass of fish associated with an oil and gas platform before, during, and after "reefing" it in the northern Gulf of Mexico Grace Elizabeth Harwell Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Recommended Citation Harwell, Grace Elizabeth, "Acoustic biomass of fish associated with an oil and gas platform before, during, and after "reefing" it in the northern Gulf of Mexico" (2013). LSU Master's Theses. 2912. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2912 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ACOUSTIC BIOMASS OF FISH ASSOCIATED WITH AN OIL AND GAS PLATFORM BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER “REEFING” IT IN THE NORTHERN GULF OF MEXICO A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Department of Oceanography and Coastal Science By Grace E. Harwell B.S., Louisiana State University, 2009 December 2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to take this opportunity to thank my advisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioacoustic Attenuation Spectroscopy: a New Approach to Monitoring Fish at Sea
    FEATURED ARTICLE Bioacoustic Attenuation Spectroscopy: A New Approach to Monitoring Fish at Sea Orest Diachok Introduction Swim bladders provide buoyancy and enable fish to be How does one find fishes in the sea? For millennia, catch- neutrally buoyant at their preferred depth between bouts ing fish has depended on luck for a fisherman out for a of vigorous swimming (Helfman et al., 2009). The size of day of recreation and both luck and knowledge of fish the swim bladder varies by species and is often related to behavior and ecological preferences for those seeking the size of the species. Although the swim bladder probably larger catches. Still, in many ways, finding fish, especially evolved to provide buoyancy to the fish, it is also involved in large quantities, was a “shot in the dark.” However, in other functions such as hearing and sound production this started to change when fisheries biologists started in many species (e.g., Popper and Hawkins, 2019). to apply acoustics to the hunt for fishes. The various approaches that have been used and that continue to Figure 1 shows an X-ray image of a side view of the evolve now enable fishers not only to find large groups of swim bladder of a pilchard sardine (Sardinops ocellatus). fish more efficiently and effectively but also to enable fish- Because swim bladders are generally filled with air, they ery biologists to quantify the number of fish in areas of scatter sound in various directions and are the primary interest, their migration patterns, and how their numbers cause of backscattering and the echoes detected by fish- evolve over time as well as other aspects of their behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Reef Fish Management Is Tough: Can Fisheries Acoustics Help?
    Reef fish management is tough: Can fisheries acoustics help? Kevin M. Boswell Marine Ecology & Acoustics Lab Primary Drivers Understand factors that act to structure ecosystems, primary focus on habitat function and use by nekton - Distributional dynamics - Habitat associations and linkages - Behavior and trophic interactions Requires continued development of novel approaches - Developing advanced approaches and platforms - Assimilating data at various resolutions and scales Difficulties lie in capacity for ‘observation’ High suspended load Diel variation- Day Diel variation- Day Night Pursue avenue other than transmitted light for ‘observing’ objects Active Acoustics • Acoustics are widely accepted tool for quantifying fish abundance and distribution across multiple environmental conditions • Benefits: reduced sampling effort, non-invasive, high resolution spatio- temporal data, reduced gear bias • Challenges: Require independent data to validate backscatter Barracuda vs. Menhaden Echosounder Imaging Sonar Plankton and 10 m small scatterers Fish 20 m Natural reef Acoustics to inform fishery independent surveys Aggregation studies: Goliath grouper- East Coast of FL. Permit- FL Keys Nassau grouper- Cayman Islands Pink snapper- Western Australia West Florida Shelf: J.C. Taylor, NOAA Courtesy of Chris Dowling/Dani Waltrick Artificial vs Natural reefs Natural vs. Artificial Reef Communities West Florida Shelf- Acoustic/Optical Fisheries Independent Survey Fishery-independent method to examine structure and biomass of reef communities at natural
    [Show full text]
  • California Fish and Wildlife Journal, Volume 106, Issue 2
    California Fish and Wildlife 106(2):139-155; 2020 Feasibility of hydroacoustic surveys of spawning aggregations for monitoring Barred Sand Bass populations off southern California LARRY G. ALLEN1*, CALVIN WON1, DEREK G. BOLSER2, AND BRAD E. ERISMAN2 1 California State University Northridge, 18111 Nordhoff St., Northridge, CA 91330-8303 USA 2 Marine Science Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, 750 Channel View Drive, Port Aransas, TX 78373 USA *Corresponding Author: [email protected] For fishes that migrate to specific locations to spawn within large aggregations at predictable times, fishery independent surveys of the abundance, distribu- tion, and population structure of adult fish at spawning aggregation sites can provide valuable data for fisheries monitoring and assessments. We tested the feasibility of using high resolution, split-beam sonar to estimate the distribu- tion, abundance, and group sizes of Barred Sand Bass (Paralabrax nebulifer) at their primary spawning aggregation site off Huntington Beach, California, in July 2010 and July 2012. We established an in-situ target strength distribu- tion for Barred Sand Bass using tethered fish, collected hydroacoustic data opportunistically over the entire spawning grounds, and validated acoustic data with concurrent video surveys and rod and reel sampling of fishes pres- ent within the survey area. The modal target strength of Barred Sand Bass was determined to be -35 dB and was distinct from other fish species present. Groups of Barred Sand Bass averaged 30 individuals in abundance and ranged from 2 to 1,711 individuals, with the vast majority of the groups containing less than 10 individuals. Groups of Barred Sand Bass were most abundant in the water column between 5 and 10 m below the surface over bottoms depths of 20 to 30 m, resulting in a negative relationship between group size and depth.
    [Show full text]