DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1707.03784V6 [Math.GN] 21 Jul 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1707.03784V6 [Math.GN] 21 Jul 2020 Complete Quasi-Metrics for Hyperspaces, Continuous Valuations, and Previsions Jean Goubault-Larrecq Universit´eParis-Saclay, CNRS, ENS Paris-Saclay, Laboratoire M´ethodes Formelles, 91190, Gif-sur-Yvette, France July 29, 2021 Abstract The Kantorovich-Rubinshte˘ınmetric is an L1-like metric on spaces of probability distributions that enjoys several serendipitous properties. It is complete separable if the underlying metric space of points is complete separable, and in that case it metrizes the weak topology. We introduce a variant of that construction in the realm of quasi- metric spaces, and prove that it is algebraic Yoneda-complete as soon as the underlying quasi-metric space of points is algebraic Yoneda- complete, and that the associated topology is the weak topology. We do this not only for probability distributions, represented as normalized continuous valuations, but also for subprobability distributions, for various hyperspaces, and in general for different brands of functionals. Those functionals model probabilistic choice, angelic and demonic non- deterministic choice, and their combinations. The mathematics needed for those results are more demanding than in the simpler case of metric spaces. To obtain our results, we prove a few other results that have independent interest, notably: continuous Yoneda-complete spaces are consonant; on a continuous Yoneda-complete space, the Scott topology arXiv:1707.03784v8 [math.GN] 28 Jul 2021 on the space of R+-valued lower semicontinuous maps coincides with the compact-open and Isbell topologies, and the subspace topology on spaces of α-Lipschitz continuous maps also coincides with the topology of pointwise convergence, and is stably compact; we introduce and study the so-called Lipschitz-regular quasi-metric spaces, and we show that the formal ball functor induces a Kock-Z¨oberlein monad, of which all algebras are Lipschitz-regular; and we prove a minimax theorem where one of the spaces is not compact Hausdorff, but merely compact. Keywords: quasi-metric, formal balls. 1 Subject classification: mathematics of computing - continuous math- ematics - topology - point-set topology. Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Outline . .6 2 Basics 9 2.1 General Topology . .9 2.2 Quasi-Metric Spaces . 11 3 The Formal Ball Monad 16 4 Lipschitz Regular Spaces 23 5 Compact Subsets of Quasi-Metric Spaces 29 6 Spaces of Continuous and Lipschitz Maps 33 6.1 f (α) for f Lower Semicontinuous . 34 6.2 f (α) for f α-Lipschitz . 39 6.3 The Functions x % b ....................... 42 7 Topologies on LX 43 a 8 Topologies on Lα(X; d) and Lα(X; d) 47 9 Topologies on L1(X; d) Determined by Lα(X; d), α > 0 52 10 The Kantorovich-Rubinshte˘ın-Hutchinson Quasi-Metric on Previsions 54 10.1 The Unbounded Kantorovich-Rubinshte˘ın-Hutchinson Quasi- Metric . 55 10.2 The Bounded Kantorovich-Rubinshte˘ın-Hutchinson Quasi-Metrics 65 10.3 Supports . 67 10.4 Preparing for Algebraicity . 73 10.5 Topologies on Spaces of Previsions . 75 10.6 Extending Previsions to Lipschitz Maps . 77 2 11 The Case of Continuous Valuations 78 11.1 Continuous Valuations and Measures . 78 11.2 The Kantorovich-Rubinshte˘ın-Hutchinson Quasi-Metric on Con- tinuous Valuations . 80 11.3 Yoneda-Completeness . 81 11.4 Algebraicity of V≤1X ...................... 83 11.5 Continuity of V≤1X ....................... 88 11.6 Probabilities on Metric Spaces . 90 11.7 Algebraicity and Continuity of the Probabilistic Powerdomain V1X ................................ 92 11.8 The Weak Topology . 99 11.9 Splitting Lemmas . 101 11.10Linear Duality . 108 12 The Hoare Powerdomain 112 12.1 The dH Quasi-Metric . 112 12.2 Completeness . 117 12.3 dH-Limits . 119 12.4 Algebraicity . 120 12.5 Continuity . 124 12.6 The Lower Vietoris Topology . 125 13 The Smyth Powerdomain 127 13.1 The dQ Quasi-Metric . 127 13.2 Completeness . 131 13.3 dQ-Limits . 132 13.4 Algebraicity . 134 13.5 Continuity . 137 13.6 The Upper Vietoris Topology . 138 14 Sublinear, Superlinear Previsions 140 14.1 A Minimax Theorem . 140 14.2 Sublinear Previsions . 145 14.3 Superlinear Previsions . 157 15 Lenses, Quasi-Lenses, and Forks 164 15.1 The Plotkin Powerdomain . 166 15.2 The Vietoris Topology . 176 15.3 Forks . 178 3 16 Open Questions 185 1 Introduction A landmark result in the theory of topological measure theory states that the space of probability distributions M1(X) on a Polish space X, with the weak topology, is again Polish. A Polish space is a separable complete metric space X; d, and to prove that theorem, one must build a suitable metric on M1(X). There are several possibilities here. One may take the L´evy-Prohorov metric for example, but we shall concentrate on the L1-like metric defined by: Z Z dKR(µ, ν) = sup h(x)dµ − h(x)dν ; h x2X x2X where h ranges over the 1-Lipschitz maps from X to R. This is sometimes called the Hutchinson metric, after J. E. Hutchinson's work on the theory of fractals [Hut81]. L. V. Kantorovich had already introduced the same notion in 1942 in a famous paper [Kan42], where he showed that, on a compact R metric space, dKR(µ, ν) is also equal to the minimum of (x;y)2X2 d(x; y)dτ, where τ ranges over the probability distributions whose first and second marginals coincide with µ and ν, respectively. (That result also holds on general Polish spaces, assuming that the double integrals of d(x; y) with re- spect to µ⊗µ and ν⊗ν are finite [Fer81].) G. P. Rubinshte˘ınmade important contributions to the theory, and dKR is variously called the Hutchinson met- ric, the Kantorovich metric, the Kantorovich-Rubinshte˘ınmetric, and in the latter cases the name of Leonid Vaserˇste˘ın(who considered Lp-like variants on the second form) is sometimes added. However, the dKR metric does not metrize the weak topology unless the metric d is bounded (see [Kra06, Lemma 3.7]). This is probably the reason why some papers consider a variant of dKR where h ranges over the 1-Lipschitz maps from X to [−1; 1] instead of R, or over the maps with Lipschitz norm at most 1, where the Lipschitz norm of h is the sum of the Lipschitz constant of h and of supx2X jh(x)j. In any case, dKR or a variant produces a complete metric on a space of probability distributions, and its open ball topology coincides with the weak topology. The aim of this paper is to generalize those results, in the following directions: 1. We consider non-Hausdorff topological spaces, and quasi-metrics in- stead of metrics. A quasi-metric is axiomatized just like a metric, 4 except that the axiom of symmetry d(x; y) = d(y; x) is dropped. 2. We consider not only measures, but also non-linear variants of mea- sures, defined as specific (continuous, positively homogeneous) func- tionals that we have called previsions [Gou07]. Both generalizations stem from questions from computer science, and from the semantics of probabilistic and non-deterministic languages, as well as from the study of transition systems with probabilistic and non-deterministic transition relations. In the realm of semantics, one often considers domains [GHK+03], which are certain directed complete partial orders. Seen as topo- logical spaces, with their Scott topology, those spaces are never Hausdorff (unless the order is equality). The question of similarity (as opposed to bisimilarity) of transition systems also requires quasi-metrics [Gou08], lead- ing to non-Hausdorff spaces. The mixture of probabilistic choice (where one chooses the next action according to some known probability distribution) and of non-deterministic choice (where the next action is chosen by a sched- uler by some unknown but deterministic strategy) calls for previsions, or for other models such as the powercone model [TKP09], which are isomorphic under weak assumptions [Gou16, KP17]. Each of these generalizations is non-trivial in itself. As far as quasi- metrics are concerned already, there are at least two distinct notions of completeness, and the one we shall consider here, Yoneda-completeness, admits several refinements (algebraicity, continuity). By comparison, all those notions of completeness coincide on metric spaces. The open ball topology is probably not the right topology on a quasi-metric space either. The paper [Gou08] shows that one can do a lot with open ball topologies, but sometimes under strange assumptions, such as total boundedness, or symcompactness. The right topology, or so we claim, is the so-called d- Scott topology, which we shall (re)define below. Again, in the metric case the d-Scott topology and the open ball topology are the same. Finally, let us mention that we shall retrieve the classical case of metrics for probability distributions by restricting to metrics, and to linear pre- visions. This will be up to a small detail: in general, linear previsions are integration functionals not of measures, but of continuous valuations [Jon90, JP89], a closely related concept that behaves better with topolog- ical notions. Measures and continuous valuations are isomorphic concepts in several important settings that go well beyond Hausdorff spaces [KL05], and we shall see that this is also true in our case, under natural assumptions (Proposition 11.3). 5 This paper is long, to a point that it may discourage the bravest reader. I plan to split it into more manageable subunits that I will attempt to publish separately. In that context, the role of the present document will be to describe the big picture, at least, which those subunits won't convey. 1.1 Outline We recapitulate some of the basic notions we need in Section 2, in particu- lar on sober spaces, quasi-metric spaces, standard quasi-metric spaces, and Lipschitz continuous functions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DISERTAˇCN´I PR´ACE Multivalued Fractals and Hyperfractals
    UNIVERZITA PALACKEHO´ V OLOMOUCI PRˇ´IRODOVEDECKˇ A´ FAKULTA KATEDRA MATEMATICKE´ ANALYZY´ A APLIKAC´I MATEMATIKY DISERTACNˇ ´I PRACE´ Multivalued fractals and hyperfractals Vedouc´ıdiplomov´epr´ace: Vypracoval: prof. RNDr. dr hab. Jan Andres, DSc. Mgr. Miroslav Rypka Rok odevzd´an´ı: 2012 Matematick´aanal´yza, IV. roˇcn´ık Prohl´aˇsen´ı Prohlaˇsuji, ˇze jsem disertaˇcn´ı pr´aci zpracoval samostatnˇepod veden´ım prof. RNDr. dr hab. Jana Andrese, DSc. s pouˇzit´ım uveden´eliteratury. V Olomouci dne 20. srpna 2012 Podˇekov´an´ı M˚uj d´ık patˇr´ıpˇredevˇs´ım profesoru Andresovi za rady a trpˇelivost. Chci podˇekovat sv´ym rodiˇc˚um a pˇr´atel˚um za podporu nejen pˇri psan´ıdisertaˇcn´ıpr´ace a profesoru Bandtovi za vstˇr´ıcnost a laskavost bˇehem moj´ıst´aˇze v Greifswaldu. Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Currentstateoftheart........................ 5 1.2 Aimsofthethesis........................... 7 1.3 Theoreticalframework . 9 1.4 Appliedmethods ........................... 9 1.5 Mainresults.............................. 9 2 Spacesandhyperspaces,mapsandhypermaps 11 3 Iteratedfunctionsystemsandinvariantmeasures 20 3.1 Iteratedfunctionsystems. 20 3.2 Measure ................................ 25 3.3 Dimensionandself-similarity. 31 3.4 LiftedIFSandsuperfractals . 34 4 Fixedpointtheoryinhyperspaces 38 5 Multivaluedfractalsandhyperfractals 42 5.1 Existenceresults ........................... 42 5.2 Address structure of multivalued fractals . .. 51 5.3 Ergodicapproach ........................... 57 5.4 Chaosgame .............................. 62 6
    [Show full text]
  • Math Morphing Proximate and Evolutionary Mechanisms
    Curriculum Units by Fellows of the Yale-New Haven Teachers Institute 2009 Volume V: Evolutionary Medicine Math Morphing Proximate and Evolutionary Mechanisms Curriculum Unit 09.05.09 by Kenneth William Spinka Introduction Background Essential Questions Lesson Plans Website Student Resources Glossary Of Terms Bibliography Appendix Introduction An important theoretical development was Nikolaas Tinbergen's distinction made originally in ethology between evolutionary and proximate mechanisms; Randolph M. Nesse and George C. Williams summarize its relevance to medicine: All biological traits need two kinds of explanation: proximate and evolutionary. The proximate explanation for a disease describes what is wrong in the bodily mechanism of individuals affected Curriculum Unit 09.05.09 1 of 27 by it. An evolutionary explanation is completely different. Instead of explaining why people are different, it explains why we are all the same in ways that leave us vulnerable to disease. Why do we all have wisdom teeth, an appendix, and cells that if triggered can rampantly multiply out of control? [1] A fractal is generally "a rough or fragmented geometric shape that can be split into parts, each of which is (at least approximately) a reduced-size copy of the whole," a property called self-similarity. The term was coined by Beno?t Mandelbrot in 1975 and was derived from the Latin fractus meaning "broken" or "fractured." A mathematical fractal is based on an equation that undergoes iteration, a form of feedback based on recursion. http://www.kwsi.com/ynhti2009/image01.html A fractal often has the following features: 1. It has a fine structure at arbitrarily small scales.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Computation of the Kantorovich Distance for Images
    DN THE COMPUTATION OF THE KANTOROV ICH DISTANCE FOR IMAGES Th omas Ka·i j ser June 1996 Report nr LiTH-ISY-R-1858 ,.. f ON THE COMPUTATION OF THE KANTOROVICH DISTANCE FOR IMAGES Thomas Kaijser June 1996 Report nr LiTH - ISY -R-1858 ,. l .. l Introduction. The Kantorovich distance for images can be defined in two ways. Either as the infimum of all "costs" for "transporting" one image into the other, where the cost-function is induced by the distance-function ehosen for measuring distances beetween pixels, - or as a supremum of all integrals for which the integration is with respect to the measure obtained by taking the difference of the two images considered as mass distributions, and for which the integrand is any function whose "slope" is bounded. (For the precise definitions see the next sections). We shall call the first of these two definitions the primal version and the seeond definition the dual version. It was Kantarovich [10], (see also [11]), who in the beginning of the 40:ies introduced this "transportation-metric" for prohability measures and proved the equality between the two definitions. This result is a special case of what in optimization theory is called the duality theorem. The first to use the primal version of the Kantarovich distance as a distance-function between 2-dimensional grey valued images with equal to­ tal grey value was probably Werman et al [19]. (See also Werman [20]). The conclusions in their paper was that the metric is applicable in many domains such as co-occurance matrices, shape matching, and picture half­ toning.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genetic Algorithm Applied to the Fractal Inverse Problem
    UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-1993 A genetic algorithm applied to the fractal inverse problem Hiroo Miyamoto University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Miyamoto, Hiroo, "A genetic algorithm applied to the fractal inverse problem" (1993). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 329. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/6d8g-4bse This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Values of the Hausdorff and Packing Measures for Limit
    NUMERICAL VALUES OF THE HAUSDORFF AND PACKING MEASURES FOR LIMIT SETS OF ITERATED FUNCTION SYSTEMS James Edward Reid Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS August 2017 APPROVED: Mariusz Urbański, Major Professor Lior Fishman, Committee Member Stephen Jackson, Committee Member Charles Conley, Chair of the Department of Mathematics David Holdeman, Dean of the College of Arts and Science Victor R. Prybutok, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Reid, James Edward. Numerical Values of the Hausdorff and Packing Measures for Limit Sets of Iterated Function Systems. Doctor of Philosophy (Mathematics), August 2017, 107 pp., 56 numbered references. In the context of fractal geometry, the natural extension of volume in Euclidean space is given by Hausdorff and packing measures. These measures arise naturally in the context of iterated function systems (IFS). For example, if the IFS is finite and conformal, then the Hausdorff and packing dimensions of the limit sets agree and the corresponding Hausdorff and packing measures are positive and finite. Moreover, the map which takes the IFS to its dimension is continuous. Developing on previous work, we show that the map which takes a finite conformal IFS to the numerical value of its packing measure is continuous. In the context of self-similar sets, we introduce the super separation condition. We then combine this condition with known density theorems to get a better handle on finding balls of maximum density. This allows us to extend the work of others and give exact formulas for the numerical value of packing measure for classes of Cantor sets, Sierpinski N-gons, and Sierpinski simplexes.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAOS and FRACTALS: the MATHEMATICS BEHIND the COMPUTER GRAPHICS Edited by Robert L
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/psapm/039 AMS SHORT COURSE LECTURE NOTES Introductory Survey Lectures A Subseries of Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics Volume 39 CHAOS AND FRACTALS: THE MATHEMATICS BEHIND THE COMPUTER GRAPHICS Edited by Robert L. Devaney and Linda Keen (Providence, Rhode Island, August 1988) Volume 38 COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY THEORY Edited by Juris Hartmanis (Atlanta, Georgia, January 1988) Volume 37 MOMENTS IN MATHEMATICS Edited by Henry J. Landau (San Antonio, Texas, January 1987) Volume 36 APPROXIMATION THEORY Edited by Carl de Boor (New Orleans, Louisiana, January 1986) Volume 35 ACTUARIAL MATHEMATICS Edited by Harry H. Panjer (Laramie, Wyoming, August 1985) Volume 34 MATHEMATICS OF INFORMATION PROCESSING Edited by Michael Anshel and William Gewirtz (Louisville, Kentucky, January 1984) Volume 33 FAIR ALLOCATION Edited by H. Peyton Young (Anaheim, California, January 1985) Volume 32 ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCE MATHEMATICS Edited by R. W. McKelvey (Eugene, Oregon, August 1984) Volume 31 COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS Edited by B. Gopinath (Denver, Colorado, January 1983) Volume 30 POPULATION BIOLOGY Edited by Simon A. Levin (Albany, New York, August 1983) Volume 29 APPLIED CRYPTOLOGY, CRYPTOGRAPHIC PROTOCOLS, AND COMPUTER SECURITY MODELS By R. A. DeMillo, G. I. Davida, D. P. Dobkin, M. A. Harrison, and R. J. Lipton (San Francisco, California, January 1981) Volume 28 STATISTICAL DATA ANALYSIS Edited by R. Gnanadesikan (Toronto, Ontario, August 1982) Volume 27 COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY Edited by L. A. Shepp (Cincinnati, Ohio, January 1982) Volume 26 THE MATHEMATICS OF NETWORKS Edited by S. A. Burr (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, August 1981) Volume 25 OPERATIONS RESEARCH: MATHEMATICS AND MODELS Edited by S. I.
    [Show full text]
  • [Math.OA] 30 Jun 2005 Dimensions and Spectral Triples for Fractals in R
    Dimensions and spectral triples for fractals in RN Daniele Guido, Tommaso Isola Dipartimento di Matematica, Universit`adi Roma “Tor Vergata”, I–00133 Roma, Italy. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract N Two spectral triples are introduced for a class of fractals in R . The definitions of noncommutative Hausdorff dimension and noncom- mutative tangential dimensions, as well as the corresponding Hausdorff and Hausdorff-Besicovitch functionals considered in [7], are studied for the mentioned fractals endowed with these spectral triples, showing in many cases their correspondence with classical objects. In particular, for any limit fractal, the Hausdorff-Besicovitch functionals do not depend on the generalized limit ω. 0 Introduction. In this paper we extend the analysis we made in [7] to fractals in RN , more pre- cisely we define spectral triples for a class of fractals and compare the classical measures, dimensions and metrics with the measures, dimensions and metrics obtained from the spectral triple, in the framework of A. Connes’ noncommu- tative geometry [2]. The class of fractals we consider is the class of limit fractals, namely fractals which can be defined as Hausdorff limits of sequences of compact sets obtained via sequences of contraction maps. This class contains the self-similar fractals arXiv:math/0404295v2 [math.OA] 30 Jun 2005 and is contained in the wider class of random fractals [12]. On any limit frac- tal, the described limit procedure produces also a family of limit measures µα, α > 0. Among limit fractals, we consider in particular the translation frac- tals, namely those for which the generating similarities of a given level have the same similarity parameter.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Computation of the Kantorovich Distance for Images
    Chaotic Modeling and Simulation (CMSIM) 2: 345{354, 2012 On the Computation of the Kantorovich Distance for Images Constantinos Alexopoulos1 and Vassileios Drakopoulos2 1 University of Athens, Panepistimioupolis, 15784 Athens, Greece (E-mail: [email protected]) 2 University of Athens, Panepistimioupolis, 15784 Athens, Greece (E-mail: [email protected]) Abstract. We consider the theory and applications of the Kantorovich metric in fractal image compression. After surveying the most important approaches for its computation, we highlight its usefulness as a mathematical tool for comparing two images and improve its performance by means of more appropriate data structures. Keywords: Fractals, Hutchinson metric, Image comparison, Kantorovich metric. 1 Introduction In many fields of computer science like pattern recognition and image process- ing, it is important to have an efficient way to compare geometric objects. The natural approach to this problem is to define a metric in the space of the ge- ometric objects and use this metric to compute the distance between them. Considering digitized images as geometric objects, we can use that metric to compare them. The Kantorovich (or Hutchinson) metric, a.k.a. Wasserstein (or Vaser- shtein), earth mover's or match metric, takes into account the spatial struc- ture of the compared images and, hence, corresponds more closely than other metrics to our notion of the visual differences between two images. John E. Hutchinson[6] used the Kantorovich distance to measure the distance between self-similar probability measures obtained as limiting distributions for a fairly simple type of Markov chains induced by affine, contractive mappings. He used the Kantorovich metric to prove an existence and uniqueness theorem of such limit measures.
    [Show full text]