DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2005.06166V1 [Cs.CL] 13 May 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2005.06166V1 [Cs.CL] 13 May 2020 Parallel Corpus Filtering via Pre-trained Language Models Boliang Zhang, Ajay Nagesh, and Kevin Knight DiDi Labs fboliangzhang, ajaynagesh, [email protected] Abstract (2018) and Belinkov and Bisk(2018) show that neural translation models are far more sensitive to Web-crawled data provides a good source of noisy parallel training data than statistical machine parallel corpora for training machine transla- tion models. It is automatically obtained, but translation. Data selection methods that can fil- extremely noisy, and recent work shows that ter noisy parallel sentences from large-scale web neural machine translation systems are more crawled resources are in demand. sensitive to noise than traditional statistical ma- In this paper, we study the problem in a real- chine translation methods. In this paper, we world scenario where we crawl a large Japanese- propose a novel approach to filter out noisy Chinese parallel corpus from various websites and sentence pairs from web-crawled corpora via build open-domain machine translation systems pre-trained language models. We measure sen- tence parallelism by leveraging the multilin- between Japanese and Chinese, by filtering the gual capability of BERT and use the Genera- web crawled parallel corpus. In addition, a small tive Pre-training (GPT) language model as a amount of clean parallel data is available, in the domain filter to balance data domains. We software domain. In order to confirm our results evaluate the proposed method on the WMT on a public data, we also apply our filter to the 2018 Parallel Corpus Filtering shared task, and WMT 2018 German-English Parallel Corpus Fil- on our own web-crawled Japanese-Chinese tering shared task. parallel corpus. Our method significantly out- Previous work on parallel corpus filtering per- performs baselines and achieves a new state- of-the-art. In an unsupervised setting, our forms poorly in our scenario as it either requires method achieves comparable performance to large clean parallel corpora or dictionaries (Xu the top-1 supervised method. We also evalu- and Koehn, 2017; Artetxe and Schwenk, 2019; ate on a web-crawled Japanese-Chinese paral- Junczys-Dowmunt, 2018; Chaudhary et al., 2019), lel corpus that we make publicly available. or relies on multilingual word embeddings and ne- glects context when measuring translation paral- 1 Introduction lelism (Hangya and Fraser, 2018). Training modern neural machine translation (NMT) In this paper, we propose a simple but effec- systems requires large parallel-text resources. tive parallel corpus filtering method. Multilingual Publicly-available parallel corpora are mostly BERT (Devlin et al., 2019) projects multilingual arXiv:2005.06166v1 [cs.CL] 13 May 2020 paired with English, such as German-English, sentences into a shared space and has shown a great French-English, Chinese-English, etc., and their potential for cross-lingual model transfer (Pires domains are limited. For building machine transla- et al., 2019). We use pre-trained multilingual tion systems between non-English language pairs, BERT as prior knowledge and fine-tune it on a such as Chinese and Japanese, existing parallel synthetic dataset. This multilingual BERT-based corpora are insufficient and often low quality. To classifier forms an acceptability filter that deter- address this problem, system builders have trained mines whether or not a sentence pair consists of a NMT systems on web-crawled data and achieved bona-fide translation. promising results (Xu and Koehn, 2017; Junczys- As the domain of training data largely affects Dowmunt, 2018; Schwenk, 2018; Schwenk et al., machine translation model performance, we also in- 2019). However, data automatically crawled from troduce a domain filter. It uses the pre-trained Gen- the web is extremely noisy. Khayrallah and Koehn erative Pre-training (GPT) as in-domain language model and is an extension of the existing cross- similarity of the source and target sentence repre- entropy difference based domain filter (Moore and sentations. The sentence representations are pro- Lewis, 2010; Junczys-Dowmunt, 2018). duced by a sentence encoder trained on clean paral- We evaluate our proposed method on the WMT lel data via a neural encoder-decoder architecture. 2018 German-English Parallel Corpus Filtering Other works based on sentence embeddings include shared task and achieve a new state-of-the-art. Our Hangya and Fraser(2018) and Littell et al.(2018), unsupervised method achieves comparable perfor- as well as Schwenk et al.(2019), which mines mil- mance to the top system that is trained on mil- lions of parallel sentences in 1620 language pairs lions of clean parallel sentence pairs. Our proposed from Wikipedia. These encoder-decoder based methods also significantly outperform baselines in methods require large amounts of clean parallel our own Japanese-Chinese parallel corpus filtering training data and are not applicable in our sce- task. nario where available data is noisy. Ondrej Bojar We make the following contributions: (2020) organize an open domain translation chal- lenge where participants are provided a large, noisy • We propose a novel approach to filter noisy set of Japanese-Chinese segment pairs built from parallel corpora by using pre-trained language web data, and the task is to clean the noisy data and models. Our approach outperforms strong build an end-to-end machine translation system. baselines and achieves a new state-of-the-art. Work on data selection is also related. Moore and Lewis(2010); Junczys-Dowmunt(2018) se- • We devise an unsupervised filtering approach lect domain-related data by computing the cross- that does not require an identifiable clean sub- entropy difference between in-domain and out- set of parallel segments. Our unsupervised domain language models. Duh et al.(2013) use method matches the results of previous super- neural language models for data selection. Axel- vised methods. rod et al.(2011) and Axelrod et al.(2015) expand cross-entropy difference filtering to both sides of • We release a large web-crawled Japanese- the parallel corpus. Since we aim to build a general Chinese parallel corpus which can be a useful machine translation system, instead of selecting resource for machine translation research on data that are relevant to a specific domain, we se- 1 non-English language pairs. lect data whose domains are as general as possible, by using Generative Pre-training (GPT) models 2 Related Work trained on large and diverse corpora. Several recent works address parallel corpus filter- 3 Method ing. Denkowski et al.(2012), Dyer et al.(2010) and Heafield(2011) use language models and word In this section we introduce a language detection alignments to determine how likely sentences are filter, a translation-acceptability filter, and a do- to be a good translation of another. Xu and Koehn main filter. Each filter produces a score for every (2017) introduce a noise filtering tool, Zipporah, candidate source/target sentence pair. The partial that discriminates parallel and non-parallel sen- score produced by each filter ranges from 0 to 1. tences based on word-frequency vectors and a dic- Values beyond this range are normalized by min- tionary. Junczys-Dowmunt(2018) proposes a dual max normalization: y^ = (y − min)=(max − min). conditional cross-entropy filtering method, which The final score is the product of the partial scores. achieved first place in the WMT 2018 German- English Parallel Corpus Filtering shared task. They 3.1 Language Detection Filter train two translation models in inverse directions on Targeting a web-crawler at a given language pair millions of parallel sentences and score sentence still results in many pages written in the wrong pairs based on the word-normalized conditional language. For example, while a URL pair may cross-entropy from the translation models. Artetxe clearly indicate translation (e.g., “.jp” and “.zh”), it and Schwenk(2019) and Schwenk(2018) propose may happen that the text content is simply copied a margin-based scoring method that compares the rather than translated. We observe this in both 1http://iwslt.org/doku.php?id=open_ our Japanese-Chinese data and the German-English domain_translation Paracrawl data set. It is necessary to filter out sen- tence pairs with undesired languages. Lample et al.(2018), where the cross-lingual word We adopt the fastText (Joulin et al., 2017, 2016) embeddings learned in an unsupervised manner are language identification toolkit in our language de- loosely aligned. However, after fine-tuning on a tection filter. For each sentence, the toolkit pro- few anchor pairs (word translations), they become duces a list of language candidates and their cor- more aligned. responding confidence scores. We select the lan- Similarly, we use an unsupervised synthetic guage that has the highest confidence score from training set as anchors to fine-tune multilingual fastText as the language of the sentence. Sentence BERT with a binary classification objective. Xu pairs that have both of the elements detected as the and Koehn(2017) did similar work to train a fil- desired language are assigned score 1 and other- tering classifier on synthetic data, but via bag-of- wise 0. By discarding sentence pairs with undesired words translation features. language IDs, we filter out 27% of our Chinese- Synthetic Training Set. In cases where a small Japanese parallel sentences and nearly 70% of the number of clean parallel sentence pairs are avail- German-English parallel sentences from Paracrawl able, we use them as positive training samples data set. for our classifier. In Japanese-Chinese filtering, we use around 300k sentence pairs, mostly from 3.2 Acceptability Filter open-source software documentation,2 as our pos- itive samples. In extreme cases where no identifi- In this section, we introduce our translation accept- able, clean parallel data is available, we sub-select ability filter, one of the main contributions in the high quality parallel sentences, which are used as paper. It aims to measure the parallelism of sen- positive samples, from the noisy parallel corpus tence pairs and filter out sentence pairs that are not based on the Hunalign (Varga et al., 2007) sentence- mutual translations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Champollion: a Robust Parallel Text Sentence Aligner
    Champollion: A Robust Parallel Text Sentence Aligner Xiaoyi Ma Linguistic Data Consortium 3600 Market St. Suite 810 Philadelphia, PA 19104 [email protected] Abstract This paper describes Champollion, a lexicon-based sentence aligner designed for robust alignment of potential noisy parallel text. Champollion increases the robustness of the alignment by assigning greater weights to less frequent translated words. Experiments on a manually aligned Chinese – English parallel corpus show that Champollion achieves high precision and recall on noisy data. Champollion can be easily ported to new language pairs. It’s freely available to the public. framework to find the maximum likelihood alignment of 1. Introduction sentences. Parallel text is a very valuable resource for a number The length based approach works remarkably well on of natural language processing tasks, including machine language pairs with high length correlation, such as translation (Brown et al. 1993; Vogel and Tribble 2002; French and English. Its performance degrades quickly, Yamada and Knight 2001;), cross language information however, when the length correlation breaks down, such retrieval, and word disambiguation. as in the case of Chinese and English. Parallel text provides the maximum utility when it is Even with language pairs with high length correlation, sentence aligned. The sentence alignment process maps the Gale-Church algorithm may fail at regions that contain sentences in the source text to their translation. The labor many sentences with similar length. A number of intensive and time consuming nature of manual sentence algorithms, such as (Wu 1994), try to overcome the alignment makes large parallel text corpus development weaknesses of length based approaches by utilizing lexical difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • The Web As a Parallel Corpus
    The Web as a Parallel Corpus Philip Resnik∗ Noah A. Smith† University of Maryland Johns Hopkins University Parallel corpora have become an essential resource for work in multilingual natural language processing. In this article, we report on our work using the STRAND system for mining parallel text on the World Wide Web, first reviewing the original algorithm and results and then presenting a set of significant enhancements. These enhancements include the use of supervised learning based on structural features of documents to improve classification performance, a new content- based measure of translational equivalence, and adaptation of the system to take advantage of the Internet Archive for mining parallel text from the Web on a large scale. Finally, the value of these techniques is demonstrated in the construction of a significant parallel corpus for a low-density language pair. 1. Introduction Parallel corpora—bodies of text in parallel translation, also known as bitexts—have taken on an important role in machine translation and multilingual natural language processing. They represent resources for automatic lexical acquisition (e.g., Gale and Church 1991; Melamed 1997), they provide indispensable training data for statistical translation models (e.g., Brown et al. 1990; Melamed 2000; Och and Ney 2002), and they can provide the connection between vocabularies in cross-language information retrieval (e.g., Davis and Dunning 1995; Landauer and Littman 1990; see also Oard 1997). More recently, researchers at Johns Hopkins University and the
    [Show full text]
  • Resourcing Machine Translation with Parallel Treebanks John Tinsley
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DCU Online Research Access Service Resourcing Machine Translation with Parallel Treebanks John Tinsley A dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) to the Dublin City University School of Computing Supervisor: Prof. Andy Way December 2009 I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of Ph.D. is entirely my own work, that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge breach any law of copyright, and has not been taken from the work of others save and to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. Signed: (Candidate) ID No.: Date: Contents Abstract vii Acknowledgements viii List of Figures ix List of Tables x 1 Introduction 1 2 Background and the Current State-of-the-Art 7 2.1 ParallelTreebanks ............................ 7 2.1.1 Sub-sentential Alignment . 9 2.1.2 Automatic Approaches to Tree Alignment . 12 2.2 Phrase-Based Statistical Machine Translation . ...... 14 2.2.1 WordAlignment ......................... 17 2.2.2 Phrase Extraction and Translation Models . 18 2.2.3 ScoringandtheLog-LinearModel . 22 2.2.4 LanguageModelling . 25 2.2.5 Decoding ............................. 27 2.3 Syntax-Based Machine Translation . 29 2.3.1 StatisticalTransfer-BasedMT . 30 2.3.2 Data-OrientedTranslation . 33 2.3.3 OtherApproaches ........................ 35 2.4 MTEvaluation.............................
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Controlled Counterfactual Generation for Text
    The Thirty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-21) Generate Your Counterfactuals: Towards Controlled Counterfactual Generation for Text Nishtha Madaan, Inkit Padhi, Naveen Panwar, Diptikalyan Saha 1IBM Research AI fnishthamadaan, naveen.panwar, [email protected], [email protected] Abstract diversity will ensure high coverage of the input space de- fined by the goal. In this paper, we aim to generate such Machine Learning has seen tremendous growth recently, counterfactual text samples which are also effective in find- which has led to a larger adoption of ML systems for ed- ing test-failures (i.e. label flips for NLP classifiers). ucational assessments, credit risk, healthcare, employment, criminal justice, to name a few. Trustworthiness of ML and Recent years have seen a tremendous increase in the work NLP systems is a crucial aspect and requires guarantee that on fairness testing (Ma, Wang, and Liu 2020; Holstein et al. the decisions they make are fair and robust. Aligned with 2019) which are capable of generating a large number of this, we propose a framework GYC, to generate a set of coun- test-cases that capture the model’s ability to misclassify or terfactual text samples, which are crucial for testing these remove unwanted bias around specific protected attributes ML systems. Our main contributions include a) We introduce (Huang et al. 2019), (Garg et al. 2019). This is not only lim- GYC, a framework to generate counterfactual samples such ited to fairness but the community has seen great interest that the generation is plausible, diverse, goal-oriented and ef- in building robust models susceptible to adversarial changes fective, b) We generate counterfactual samples, that can direct (Goodfellow, Shlens, and Szegedy 2014; Michel et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Language Processing Security- and Defense-Related Lessons Learned
    July 2021 Perspective EXPERT INSIGHTS ON A TIMELY POLICY ISSUE PETER SCHIRMER, AMBER JAYCOCKS, SEAN MANN, WILLIAM MARCELLINO, LUKE J. MATTHEWS, JOHN DAVID PARSONS, DAVID SCHULKER Natural Language Processing Security- and Defense-Related Lessons Learned his Perspective offers a collection of lessons learned from RAND Corporation projects that employed natural language processing (NLP) tools and methods. It is written as a reference document for the practitioner Tand is not intended to be a primer on concepts, algorithms, or applications, nor does it purport to be a systematic inventory of all lessons relevant to NLP or data analytics. It is based on a convenience sample of NLP practitioners who spend or spent a majority of their time at RAND working on projects related to national defense, national intelligence, international security, or homeland security; thus, the lessons learned are drawn largely from projects in these areas. Although few of the lessons are applicable exclusively to the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and its NLP tasks, many may prove particularly salient for DoD, because its terminology is very domain-specific and full of jargon, much of its data are classified or sensitive, its computing environment is more restricted, and its information systems are gen- erally not designed to support large-scale analysis. This Perspective addresses each C O R P O R A T I O N of these issues and many more. The presentation prioritizes • identifying studies conducting health service readability over literary grace. research and primary care research that were sup- We use NLP as an umbrella term for the range of tools ported by federal agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • A User Interface-Level Integration Method for Multiple Automatic Speech Translation Systems
    A User Interface-Level Integration Method for Multiple Automatic Speech Translation Systems Seiya Osada1, Kiyoshi Yamabana1, Ken Hanazawa1, Akitoshi Okumura1 1 Media and Information Research Laboratories NEC Corporation 1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa 211-8666, Japan {s-osada@cd, k-yamabana@ct, k-hanazawa@cq, a-okumura@bx}.jp.nec.com Abstract. We propose a new method to integrate multiple speech translation systems based on user interface-level integration. Users can select the result of free-sentence speech translation or that of registered sentence translation without being conscious of the configuration of the automatic speech translation system. We implemented this method on a portable device. Keywords: speech translation, user interface, machine translation, registered sentence retrieval, speech recognition 1 Introduction There have been many researches on speech-to-speech translation systems, such as NEC speech translation system[1], ATR-MATRIX[2] and Verbmobil[3]. These speech-to-speech translation systems include at least three components: speech recognition, machine translation, and speech synthesis. However, in practice, each component does not always output the correct result for various inputs. In actual use of a speech-to-speech translation system with a display, the speaker using the system can examine the result of speech recognition on the display. Accordingly, when the recognition result is inappropriate, the speaker can correct errors by speaking again to the system. Similarly, when the result of speech synthesis is not correct, the listener using the system can examine the source sentence of speech synthesis on the display. On the other hand, the feature of machine translation is different from that of speech recognition or speech synthesis, because neither the speaker nor the listener using the system can confirm the result of machine translation.
    [Show full text]
  • Lines: an English-Swedish Parallel Treebank
    LinES: An English-Swedish Parallel Treebank Lars Ahrenberg NLPLab, Human-Centered Systems Department of Computer and Information Science Link¨opings universitet [email protected] Abstract • We can investigate the distribution of differ- ent kinds of shifts in different sub-corpora and This paper presents an English-Swedish Par- characterize the translation strategy used in allel Treebank, LinES, that is currently un- terms of these distributions. der development. LinES is intended as a resource for the study of variation in trans- In this paper the focus is mainly on the second as- lation of common syntactic constructions pect, i.e., on identifying translation correspondences from English to Swedish. For this rea- of various kinds and presenting them to the user. son, annotation in LinES is syntactically ori- When two segments correspond under translation ented, multi-level, complete and manually but differ in structure or meaning, we talk of a trans- reviewed according to guidelines. Another lation shift (Catford, 1965). Translation shifts are aim of LinES is to support queries made in common in translation even for languages that are terms of types of translation shifts. closely related and may occur for various reasons. This paper has its focus on structural shifts, i.e., on 1 Introduction changes in syntactic properties and relations. Translation shifts have been studied mainly by The empirical turn in computational linguistics has translation scholars but is also of relevance to ma- spurred the development of ever new types of basic chine translation, as the occurrence of translation linguistic resources. Treebanks are now regarded as shifts is what makes translation difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Lingual Bootstrapping of Semantic Lexicons: the Case of Framenet
    Cross-lingual Bootstrapping of Semantic Lexicons: The Case of FrameNet Sebastian Padó Mirella Lapata Computational Linguistics, Saarland University School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh P.O. Box 15 11 50, 66041 Saarbrücken, Germany 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, UK [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Frame: COMMITMENT This paper considers the problem of unsupervised seman- tic lexicon acquisition. We introduce a fully automatic ap- SPEAKER Kim promised to be on time. proach which exploits parallel corpora, relies on shallow text ADDRESSEE Kim promised Pat to be on time. properties, and is relatively inexpensive. Given the English MESSAGE Kim promised Pat to be on time. FrameNet lexicon, our method exploits word alignments to TOPIC The government broke its promise generate frame candidate lists for new languages, which are about taxes. subsequently pruned automatically using a small set of lin- Frame Elements MEDIUM Kim promised in writing to sell Pat guistically motivated filters. Evaluation shows that our ap- the house. proach can produce high-precision multilingual FrameNet lexicons without recourse to bilingual dictionaries or deep consent.v, covenant.n, covenant.v, oath.n, vow.n, syntactic and semantic analysis. pledge.v, promise.n, promise.v, swear.v, threat.n, FEEs threaten.v, undertake.v, undertaking.n, volunteer.v Introduction Table 1: Example frame from the FrameNet database Shallow semantic parsing, the task of automatically identi- fying the semantic roles conveyed by sentential constituents, is an important step towards text understanding and can ul- instance, the SPEAKER is typically an NP, whereas the MES- timately benefit many natural language processing applica- SAGE is often expressed as a clausal complement (see the ex- tions ranging from information extraction (Surdeanu et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Parallel Texts
    Natural Language Engineering 11 (3): 239–246. c 2005 Cambridge University Press 239 doi:10.1017/S1351324905003827 Printed in the United Kingdom Parallel texts RADA MIHALCEA Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University of North Texas, P.O. Box 311366, Denton, TX 76203 USA e-mail: [email protected] MICHEL SIMARD Xerox Research Centre Europe, 6, Chemin de Maupertuis, 38240 Meylan, France e-mail: [email protected] (Received May 1 2004; revised November 30 2004 ) Abstract Parallel texts1 have become a vital element for natural language processing. We present a panorama of current research activities related to parallel texts, and offer some thoughts about the future of this rich field of investigation. 1 Introduction Parallel texts have become a vital element in many areas of natural language processing (NLP). They represent one of the richest and most versatile sources of knowledge for NLP, and have been used successfully not only in problems that are intrinsically multilingual, such as machine translation and cross-lingual information retrieval, but also as an indirect way of attacking “monolingual” problems, for example in semantic and syntactic analysis. Why have parallel texts proven such a fruitful resource? Most likely because of their ability to represent meaning: the translation of a text in another language can be seen as a semantic representation of that text, which opens the doors to a tremendously large number of language processing applications that operate on such representations. In his famous memorandum from 1949, Warren Weaver wrote: “When I look at an article in Russian, I say: ‘This is really written in English, but it has been coded in some strange symbols.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Architecture for Multilingual Parallel Texts M.T
    Open architecture for multilingual parallel texts M.T. Carrasco Benitez Luxembourg, 28 August 2008, version 1 1. Abstract Multilingual parallel texts (abbreviated to parallel texts) are linguistic versions of the same content (“translations”); e.g., the Maastricht Treaty in English and Spanish are parallel texts. This document is about creating an open architecture for the whole Authoring, Translation and Publishing Chain (ATP-chain) for the processing of parallel texts. 2. Summary 2.1. Next steps The next steps should be: • Administrative organisation: create a coordinating organisation and approach the existing organisations that might cooperate; e.g., IETF, LISA, OASIS, W3C. • Public discussion: with an emailing list (or similar) to reach a rough consensus, in particular on aspects such as the required specifications. Organise the necessary meeting(s). • Tools: implement some tools. This might be done simultaneously with the public discussion to better illustrate the approach and support the discussion. 2.2. Best approaches To obtain the best quality, speed and the lowest possible cost (QSC) in the production of parallel texts, one should aim for: • Generating all the linguistic versions ready for publication, from linguistic resources. Probably one of the best approaches. • Seamless ATP-chain implementations. • Authoring: Computer-aided authoring (CAA) tools with a controlled authoring environment; it should deliver source texts prepared for translation. • Translation: Computer-aided translation (CAT) tools to allow translators to focus only in translating and unburden translators from auxiliary tasks such as formatting. These tools should have functionalities such as side-by-side editor and the re-use of previous translations. • Publishing: Computer-aided publishing (CAP) tools to minimise human intervention.
    [Show full text]
  • Unsupervised Learning of Cross-Modal Mappings Between
    Unsupervised Learning of Cross-Modal Mappings between Speech and Text by Yu-An Chung B.S., National Taiwan University (2016) Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2019 c Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2019. All rights reserved. Author.............................................................. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science May 3, 2019 Certified by. James R. Glass Senior Research Scientist in Computer Science Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . Leslie A. Kolodziejski Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Chair, Department Committee on Graduate Students 2 Unsupervised Learning of Cross-Modal Mappings between Speech and Text by Yu-An Chung Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science on May 3, 2019, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Abstract Deep learning is one of the most prominent machine learning techniques nowadays, being the state-of-the-art on a broad range of applications in computer vision, nat- ural language processing, and speech and audio processing. Current deep learning models, however, rely on significant amounts of supervision for training to achieve exceptional performance. For example, commercial speech recognition systems are usually trained on tens of thousands of hours of annotated data, which take the form of audio paired with transcriptions for training acoustic models, collections of text for training language models, and (possibly) linguist-crafted lexicons mapping words to their pronunciations. The immense cost of collecting these resources makes applying state-of-the-art speech recognition algorithm to under-resourced languages infeasible.
    [Show full text]
  • BITS: a Method for Bilingual Text Search Over the Web
    BITS: A Method for Bilingual Text Search over the Web Xiaoyi Ma, Mark Y. Liberman Linguistic Data Consortium 3615 Market St. Suite 200 Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA {xma,myl}@ldc.upenn.edu Abstract Parallel corpus are valuable based, only a few are statistical machine resource for machine translation, multi- translation. Some scholars believe that the lack lingual text retrieval, language education of large parallel corpora makes statistical and other applications, but for various approach impossible, the researchers don’t have reasons, its availability is very limited at large enough parallel corpuses to give some present. Noticed that the World Wide language pairs a shot. Web is a potential source to mine parallel However, the unexplored World Wide Web text, researchers are making their efforts could be a good resource to find large-size and to explore the Web in order to get a big balanced parallel text. According to the web collection of bitext. This paper presents survey we did in 1997, 1 of 10 de domain BITS (Bilingual Internet Text Search), a websites are German – English bilingual, the system which harvests multilingual texts number of de domain websites is about 150,000 over the World Wide Web with virtually at that time, so there might be 50,000 German – no human intervention. The technique is English bilingual websites in de domain alone. simple, easy to port to any language pairs, Things are changing since a potential gold mine and with high accuracy. The results of the of parallel text, the World Wide Web, has been experiments on German – English pair discovered.
    [Show full text]