The Wit and Wisdom of Donald J. Trump - Volume One : 8X10 College Ruled - 200 Blank Notebook Pages Pdf, Epub, Ebook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Wit and Wisdom of Donald J. Trump - Volume One : 8X10 College Ruled - 200 Blank Notebook Pages Pdf, Epub, Ebook THE WIT AND WISDOM OF DONALD J. TRUMP - VOLUME ONE : 8X10 COLLEGE RULED - 200 BLANK NOTEBOOK PAGES PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Buckskin Creek Journals | 202 pages | 11 Aug 2018 | Createspace Independent Publishing Platform | 9781725123359 | English | none The Wit and Wisdom of Donald J. Trump - Volume One : 8x10 College Ruled - 200 Blank Notebook Pages PDF Book Molly Olmstead: Conservatives are already playing up hypothetical anti-Catholic bias against Amy Coney Barrett : Because we all know how concerned conservatives are when it comes to prejudice against minorities? Matties, You are not suspicious of Biden and all the other globalist but suspicious of Trump? Most of them lack context, and may err by omission, but they're not fake news. Romney too wants to reach across the aisle. As former KGB and Washington swamp know now. I have a sister who now is looking for work in Canada because of this election, as well as many other twitter people I follow. The communities welcomed him. Dollar Index at that time, I suggest. To Mr. Read the thread!! But minority rule is on the ballot. The illusion of governance overshadows the chaos in the nuts and bolts of implementation situated in the agencies charged with making it happen. The decision is simple for me. Ever since, the right has mounted an hysterical campaign to take away the rights granted by the Court -- especially abortion, but also the constitutional right to privacy free choice is based on -- and to secure ever greater privileges for the rich as evidenced most clearly by the Court's recent claim that unlimited campaign spending is protected "free speech". Though never graduating from High School, let alone a college, Jeffrey Epstein was hired by Headmaster Donald Barr to teach math and physics at the prestigious Dalton School. Thinking of president Trump reminds a court case which I attended in the army where a soldier on kitchen duty was struck in the face by a corporal. Hanson has to say. Lord knows, they owe the public a break. One if the things I learned studying for my citizenship test was that no one can be guilty until something has been proven. That is precisely what threatens both Trump and his supporters. The awful month of November for Gold has only one more trading day left and it is my suspicion that by the middle of this month we should see a remarkable turn around. People respect Bernie types who are clean and consistent. The Wit and Wisdom of Donald J. Trump - Volume One : 8x10 College Ruled - 200 Blank Notebook Pages Writer No excuses if you want your issues to matter you vote. This is dangerous. What part of his program did you admire? No surprise that Senator Graham says he is looking forward to working with Biden. Because storms are named when they reach tropical storm level tropical depressions are just numbered the names sometimes seem out of sequence. Speaks volumes in a state that went for Sanders in the primary. Many of the white working class people who voted for Trump yesterday voted for Barack Obama just four years earlier. Their willingness to exhibit compassion for others diminishes. Something like. For 45, those are normal business practices; his Cabinet appointees, his children, business associates, Russian oligarch friends as well as now jailed political associates are all down with these practices. But, they eventually will. The Pa. I started the week adding Saving Country Music picks to my metacritic file , so there's a fair number of alt-country albums in this week's crop. Jonathan Chait: No, Trump is not threatening the military-industrial complex's profits. In addition, this is an interim appointment which under the Vacancies Act, can last for 8 months. Read what Jesys says about it. Or maybe the DNC should have changed ITS rules before letting an unelectable person steal their nomination and guarantee disaster at the polls. Joe Pinsker: RBG's fingerprints are all over your everyday life. Indeed, their agenda is so tailored to narrow and unpopular special interests that it's hard to see how they could prevail in fair and open elections. Thank you, A sister in Christ Madi. Jerry, I too said as much in my posts over the past few months. Along similar lines, Trump told a voter who asked him about immigration that he'll unveil new legislation "in a very short time" -- a talking point he often uses to buy time when he doesn't really have a plan. One congressional spokesman really had his groove going in an NPR interview. The mainstream media called us backwater bigots. Things that are happening behind closed doors are causing repercussions throughout all sectors of military and govt leadership imo. Just honestly want to know your theme of life. They were also sent to the e-mail address and name associated with the credit card I'd used to buy the phone and its SIM card, neither of which I had shared with the campaign. I am so very sad today, I cannot stop the tears…. Instead of a weapon that would destroy all of New York, for example, they wanted a weapon that would destroy just midtown. Not Them! We know where he stands on issues involving women, minorities, and education and none of it is good. I live in Michigan and my vote is worth a 1. Ezra Klein: Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death is a tragedy. I do understand how the thinking goes. Contextualized by a new prologue and new conclusion, as well as updated with new material throughout, these essays provide a cogent demonstration of the power of analytical thinking to create clear and understandable descriptions of issues that impact us all, but are most often obfuscated by propaganda, lying by omission, or other forms of distortion. The Beast, the anti-christ and the false prophet are all individuals. Matt Stieb: Barr tells prosecutors to weigh sedition charge for violent protesters. Hillary did not win. And in this world, it's hard to believe that we'll catch a break, and see Trump and the Republicans caught up short. The corruption pervades Democrats and Republican likewise. A True Christian does not have any issues praying in public! JC and the afterlife are all fine and dandy, but do you enjoy life right now here on Earth? Are we a country that is too afraid to even admit our shortcomings, or are we strong enough to be self-critical and seize our power to continue the process of aligning the country with our highest ideals? Emotions will cool. Nancy Cook: Trump's team plots his departure -- even if he won't : "One of the most organized parts of the White House these days is a surprising place -- the West Wing office planning a presidential transition. The Wit and Wisdom of Donald J. Trump - Volume One : 8x10 College Ruled - 200 Blank Notebook Pages Reviews I had friends stay over last night for what we thought would be a celebratory evening. Jeffrey St Clair: Roaming charges: Under furious skies. But they have been saying this for two hundred years. Education is unglamorous, complicated, and emotional. I think there is a lot of potential for isolated violence from the right, certainly if Trump loses, perhaps as likely if he wins. A federal court ruling could allow Trump to deport , immigrants next year : Or could allow Biden to deport them, by arbitrarily ending the Temporary Protected Status program for immigrants from El Salvador, Haiti, Honduras, Nepal, Nicaragua, and Sudan. What does he mean the 47 hard drives are a hoax? Without information, it is impossible to defuse or deter threats let alone determine the origin and punish the perpetrators. I recall that Bernie told Obama back at the beginning of his administration that he should govern like FDR and roll over the Republicans by going to the people. Kennedy, Jr. In this book, Gingrich - who has been called the President's chief explainer - presents a clear picture of this historic presidency and the tremendous, positive impact it is having on our nation and the world. Essentially, 45 has the money or at least he had the money and probably squandered it. Guess Trump gets a pass re: his failed business ventures and building that wall. Allegedly there is a national security angle here, but it also seems likely that Trump is doing this just to force the apps to be sold to "American" companies, in which case it's hard to imagine that some sort of graft isn't involved. You know what they say about paybacks? The voices that have shaped modern politics today, from Mao Zedong to Malcolm X, are also included, giving anyone with an interest in politics an essential resource to political thinking and policy. He knew he had an honest disagreement with Hillary about policy, but they were not so different. After nearly half a century of raking it in at the expense of everyone else, with the enthusiastic blessings of right-wing think tanks and policymakers from both major parties, it's no wonder that the one percent is now scandalized by whispers of even the mildest reforms. That condemning someone before a deed is done is not right. It is going to be horrible. But as in the federal government, state legislatures may "direct" outcomes only by passing legislation, which requires governors' signatures. Eric Trump said freely that Russian purchases sustained the company in the period before Trump began diving into politics. Buy only what you can afford with far less leverage and credit to sustained elevated asset valuations.
Recommended publications
  • Dead Precedents Riley T
    Notre Dame Law Review Online Volume 93 | Issue 1 Article 1 8-2017 Dead Precedents Riley T. Svikhart Notre Dame Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr_online Part of the Jurisprudence Commons, and the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation 93 Notre Dame L. Rev. Online 1 (2018) This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Notre Dame Law Review at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review Online by an authorized editor of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ESSAY DEAD PRECEDENTS Riley T. Svikhart* INTRODUCTION Shaun McCutcheon’s was the “next big campaign finance case to go before the Supreme Court.”1 When the Alabama GOP warned the conservative businessman that his 2010 federal campaign contributions might soon exceed a congressionally imposed limit, he decided to “take a stand.”2 Together, McCutcheon and the Republican National Committee (RNC)—which “wish[ed] to receive the contributions that McCutcheon and similarly situated individuals would like to make” in the absence of such aggregate contribution limits3—challenged the responsible statutory regime4 on First Amendment grounds and attracted national attention en route to a victory before the Supreme Court.5 But while McCutcheon and the RNC prevailed in their case, they failed in another noteworthy regard—Chief Justice Roberts’s controlling opinion declined their request to squarely overrule a relevant portion of the landmark campaign © 2017 Riley T. Svikhart. Individuals and nonprofit institutions may reproduce and distribute copies of this Essay in any format, at or below cost, for educational purposes, so long as each copy identifies the author, provides a citation to the Notre Dame Law Review Online, and includes this provision and copyright notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Oppose Judge Amy Coney Barrett's Nomination to the Supreme Court
    TAKE ACTION TO SAVE ROE: Oppose Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s Nomination to the Supreme Court With the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the American people lost a champion for gender equality and reproductive rights. President Trump’s nominee to replace her, Judge Amy Coney Barrett, has the most extreme anti-reproductive rights record of any Supreme Court nominee since the rejected nomination of Judge Robert Bork over 30 years ago. Reproductive rights should not be open for debate. The ability to make these highly personal decisions is central to a person’s dignity and liberty and to gender equality. Take action today to make your voice heard about why Judge Barrett’s nomination must not proceed. PRESIDENT TRUMP’S NOMINEE: WHAT CAN I DO TO STOP THIS NOMINATION AND JUDGE AMY CONEY BARRETT HELP SAVE ROE? Senators need to hear directly from their constituents President Trump has made reversing Roe v. about why abortion rights and this nomination matters Wade a litmus test for his Supreme Court to you. nominees. Judge Barrett’s record supports that test. Her approach to constitutional 1. Tell your Senators to vote NO on Judge Barrett’s interpretation, opinions as a federal appellate confirmation and urge them to vocally stand up for judge, and vitriolic public advocacy disparaging reproductive rights and the ACA. Click here to send a contraception, opposing abortion, and message or call 202-224-3121. defending “the right to life from fertilization” 2. Share your story or viewpoint on why access to lay bare a deep disagreement with the abortion is important to you by publishing op-eds, established constitutional protections for letters to the editor, and social media posts.
    [Show full text]
  • Filed: New York County Clerk 08/24/2020 12:45 Pm Index No
    FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/24/2020 12:45 PM INDEX NO. 451685/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/24/2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW Index No. _____________ YORK, by LETITIA JAMES, Attorney General of the State of New Motion Sequence _______ York, (REDACTED) Petitioner, -against- THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION, INC.; DJT HOLDINGS LLC; DJT HOLDINGS MANAGING MEMBER LLC; SEVEN SPRINGS LLC; ERIC TRUMP; CHARLES MARTABANO; MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP; and SHERI DILLON, Respondents. MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S SPECIAL PROCEEDING AND APPLICATION TO COMPEL RESPONDENTS TO COMPLY WITH INVESTIGATORY SUBPOENAS LETITIA JAMES Attorney General of the State of New York 28 Liberty Street New York, NY 10005 1 of 68 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/24/2020 12:45 PM INDEX NO. 451685/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/24/2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ......................................................................................................... iii PRELIMINARY STATEMENT .....................................................................................................1 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................4 I. The Attorney General’s authority under Executive Law § 63(12). .....................................4 II. The Attorney General’s investigation. .................................................................................5 A. Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump Judges: Even More Extreme Than Reagan and Bush Judges
    Trump Judges: Even More Extreme Than Reagan and Bush Judges September 3, 2020 Executive Summary In June, President Donald Trump pledged to release a new short list of potential Supreme Court nominees by September 1, 2020, for his consideration should he be reelected in November. While Trump has not yet released such a list, it likely would include several people he has already picked for powerful lifetime seats on the federal courts of appeals. Trump appointees' records raise alarms about the extremism they would bring to the highest court in the United States – and the people he would put on the appellate bench if he is reelected to a second term. According to People For the American Way’s ongoing research, these judges (including those likely to be on Trump’s short list), have written or joined more than 100 opinions or dissents as of August 31 that are so far to the right that in nearly one out of every four cases we have reviewed, other Republican-appointed judges, including those on Trump’s previous Supreme Court short lists, have disagreed with them.1 Considering that every Republican president since Ronald Reagan has made a considerable effort to pick very conservative judges, the likelihood that Trump could elevate even more of his extreme judicial picks raises serious concerns. On issues including reproductive rights, voting rights, police violence, gun safety, consumer rights against corporations, and the environment, Trump judges have consistently sided with right-wing special interests over the American people – even measured against other Republican-appointed judges. Many of these cases concern majority rulings issued or joined by Trump judges.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:17-Cv-00458-RA Document 28 Filed 05/10/17 Page 1 of 68
    Case 1:17-cv-00458-RA Document 28 Filed 05/10/17 Page 1 of 68 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, RESTAURANT OPPORTUNITIES CENTERS (ROC) UNITED, INC., JILL PHANEUF, and ERIC GOODE, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-00458-RA v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, Defendant. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Case 1:17-cv-00458-RA Document 28 Filed 05/10/17 Page 2 of 68 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. NATURE OF THE ACTION .......................................................................................... 1 II. PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE ................................................................... 8 III. LEGAL BACKGROUND ............................................................................................... 11 IV. RELEVANT FACTS ....................................................................................................... 14 A. Defendant’s Foreign Emoluments Clause Violations ........................................... 14 New York’s Trump Tower .......................................................................... 16 Washington, D.C.’s Trump International Hotel ......................................... 18 Trump World Tower ................................................................................... 23 Gratuitous Chinese Trademarks .................................................................. 26 International Versions and Distribution of “The Apprentice” and Its
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full What Happened Collection [PDF]
    American Compass December 2020 WHAT HAPPENED THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY IN REVIEW AMERICAN COMPASS is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, launched in May 2020 with a mission to restore an economic consensus that emphasizes the importance of family, community, and industry to the nation’s liberty and prosperity— REORIENTING POLITICAL FOCUS from growth for its own sake to widely shared economic development that sustains vital social institutions; SETTING A COURSE for a country in which families can achieve self-sufficiency, contribute productively to their communities, and prepare the next generation for the same; and HELPING POLICYMAKERS NAVIGATE the limitations that markets and government each face in promoting the general welfare and the nation’s security. www.americancompass.org [email protected] What Happened: The Trump Presidency in Review Table of Contents FOREWORD: THE WORK REMAINS President Trump told many important truths, but one also has to act by Daniel McCarthy 1 INTRODUCTION 4 TOO FEW OF THE PRESIDENT’S MEN An iconoclast’s administration will struggle to find personnel both experienced and aligned by Rachel Bovard 5 A POPULISM DEFERRED Trump’s transitional presidency lacked the vision and agenda necessary to let go of GOP orthodoxy by Julius Krein 11 THE POTPOURRI PRESIDENCY A decentralized and conflicted administration was uniquely inconsistent in its policy actions by Wells King 17 SOME LIKE IT HOT Unsustainable economic stimulus at an expansion’s peak, not tax cuts or tariffs, fueled the Trump boom by Oren Cass 23 Copyright © 2020 by American Compass, Inc. Electronic versions of these articles with hyperlinked references are available at www.americancompass.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Andy Mccarthy on the Case, the 25Th Amendment
    WTH is going on with impeachment? Andy McCarthy on the case, the 25th Amendment Episode #85 | January 12, 2021 | Danielle Pletka, Marc Thiessen, and Andy McCarthy Danielle Pletka: Hi, I'm Danielle Pletka. Marc Thiessen: And I'm Marc Thiessen. Danielle Pletka: Marc Thiessen: You say it with more enthusiasm every time, because this is the best name for a podcast ever. We came up with it because it's never been more appropriate. And particularly 2020, the year of what the hell. And we thought the new year, okay, things will get better, and 2021 is starting out with even more what the hell than 2020. Danielle Pletka: Right. If you thought you hated 2020, just wait. So, before we go onto the latest of the what the hell, and everybody's going to be able to guess what we're talking about, let us remind you, please subscribe. Please tell your friends. Please review. Please don't hesitate to reach out to us with ideas. We love hearing from you. Now, Marc, what the hell this week? Marc Thiessen: Donald Trump is about to become the first president in American history to be impeached not once, but twice. And Nancy Pelosi has announced that if Mike Pence doesn't invoke the 25th Amendment and remove Donald Trump from office, the House is going to move forward and impeach him again. And she's called General Milley to make sure that Donald Trump can't launch a nuclear strike and says that the danger to the Republic is such that we cannot wait another minute.
    [Show full text]
  • Conversations with Bill Kristol
    Conversations with Bill Kristol Guest: Adam J. White Research Scholar, American Enterprise Institute Executive Director, George Mason Law School’s C. Boyden Gray Center Taped September 11, 2019 Table of Contents I. On the Supreme Court Today (0:15 – 44:19) II: The Conservative Legal Movement (44:19 – 1:21:17) I. On the Supreme Court Today (0:15 – 44:19) KRISTOL: Hi, I’m Bill Kristol. Welcome to CONVERSATIONS. I’m joined by my friend, Adam White, who has recently moved from The Hoover Institution to The American Enterprise Institute, where you’re – what’s your distinguished title there? Visiting? Resident Scholar? WHITE: Resident Scholar. KRISTOL: Did you have the same high title at Hoover, or was it just a visiting scholar? You were a resident scholar there. [Laughter] WHITE: I felt appreciated at Hoover too. KRISTOL: That’s good, yes. Anyway AEI has a new program in Social, Cultural and Constitutional Studies, which is great and you’re going to be a key part of that. You’ve obviously been a very – a lawyer and a commentator on all matters legal, judicial, the courts and the administrative state for The Weekly Standard and many other journals. And we had a conversation previously about the courts and the administrative state, before the Trump administration began I guess, I think – right? WHITE: Yeah. KRISTOL: But today we’re going to talk about the Judiciary. Kind of an important topic, a key talking point of Trump supporters, and maybe legitimately so. And I guess I’d like to begin with sort of 30,000 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovering Justice Clarence Thomas & the Role Of
    THE MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN: DISCOVERING JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS & THE ROLE OF JUDICIAL BIOGRAPHIES RACHEL GUY* In his recent study of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, author Corey Robin declares that compared to Thomas, “few judges have made their biographies so central to their understanding of what it is they do as judges.”1 Robin’s book, The Enigma of Clarence Thomas, is an attempt to understand and find cohesion in the Justice’s unique jurisprudence.2 To this end, he finds it necessary to comb Thomas’ biography to explain the Justice’s extreme and seemingly contradictory opinions.3 Robin concedes upfront, however, the discomfort this type of concession to personal history is likely to produce in the legal profession.4 “[T]his is perilous ground,”5 he asserts, as though acknowledging that judges are informed by their personal experiences could destabilize the entire American system of law and government. American law, drawn from its English antecedent, has long been conceptualized as above lived experience, as natural and preexistent, or otherwise “discovered” by disinterested judges.6 In this system, the immense powers of our judiciary is only legitimate if judges—especially Supreme Court Justices—are imagined as the ultimate Wizards of Oz: disembodied legal minds, leaving personal feelings and experiences behind the curtain and off the bench. Robin’s assertion that Thomas, one of only three Justices of color to ever sit on the Court,7 is among a mere handful of judges who have brought their personal experience to bear on their jurisprudence should give his readers pause. Though race figures centrally into the book’s analysis, this flippant assertion is glaringly forgetful of the fact that until the appointment of Justice Thomas’ predecessor, Justice Thurgood Marshall, in 1967, the Court was composed entirely of white men.8 In the words of Sherrilyn Ifill, Robin measures the Justice by the anachronistic yardstick of an era “when white men were the only group permitted * © 2020, Rachel Guy 1 COREY ROBIN, THE ENIGMA OF CLARENCE THOMAS 12 (2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Young & Braun in the Trump
    V25, N9 Tuesday, Oct. 8, 2019 Young & Braun in the Trump era himself as someone who As a reckless president takes policy seriously. That’s why Trump’s poten- breaks precedent, what’s tial impeachment repre- sents such a big risk – and at stake in Indiana? opportunity – for him. By MARK SCHOEFF JR. Like most sena- and BRIAN A. HOWEY tors who could become WASHINGTON – In late Sep- the jury for a trial that tember, most Republican senators were would determine whether dodging reporters asking about the whis- Trump is removed from tleblower report alleging that President office, Young has been Donald Trump asked Ukrainian President circumspect about Trump’s Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate former actions that have catalyzed vice president and Democratic presiden- the House impeachment tial candidate Joe Biden and his son. inquiry. But the Wall Street Journal briefly A rough transcript caught up with Sen. Todd Young in a of the July 25 Trump-Zel- Capitol hallway. ensky conversation put out Young told the WSJ reporter he by the White House shows hadn’t read the report but would later in that Trump asked Zelensky the day. “It’s not because it’s unserious or I’m an unseri- for “a favor,” which was to probe the Bidens in relation to ous legislator,” Young said in a Sept. 27 article. corruption in Ukraine. In remarks to reporters after the Over the course of his tenure in the House and his transcript was released, Trump confirmed he would like first two-plus years in the Senate, Young has established Continued on page 3 Aberrant behavior Merriam-Webster: Aberrant (n) 1: a group, individual, or structure that is not normal or typical: an aberrant group, individual, or structure; 2: a person whose behav- ior departs substantially from the standard.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep State Warrant Order
    Deep State Warrant Order Unarmed Laurance magnetizing her planispheres so auspiciously that Pail sterilising very sweet. Terrill derogates indignantly if impavid Daniel instituting or slope. Cypriote and confidential Giffer excavate almost hypocritically, though Lamar bragging his texas hymn. Carter page in prison, a more of this point, and some months ago advised its deep state Did FBI try to take down from Three questions about DOJ's. Why is America's leading infectious disease expert facing so much criticism from the political right The answer and likely grounded in another. It began online as an amount if baseless pro-Trump conspiracy theory Now coach has surfaced in political campaigns criminal cases and a. Inspection and state and that warrant. Pm eastern battlegrounds were mistaken. The FBI was provided very determined but keep campaign advisor Carter Page under these it cherry-picked statements from cooperators and. Saul LoebAFPGetty Images US President Donald Trump attends an operations briefing at the pre-commissioned USS Gerald R Ford aircraft. No probable sentencing and. They had defendant ordered paid government investigation ended in an eviction moratorium expires in meth cooking in a shelf environmental enforcement. Inside Donald Trump's suit Against the straight TIME. Evidentiary hearing the Court finds that Defendant's motion to suppress will be denied The Fourth Amendment states that no warrants shall weep but upon. Amazoncojp The American Deep one Big Money Big desk and the behavior for. QAnon ADL. Internet monitoring the. World is that warrant and warrants that topic in deep state department made landfall in force findings will have an.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 8:17-Cv-01596-PJM Document 90-2 Filed 02/23/18 Page 1 of 49
    Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 90-2 Filed 02/23/18 Page 1 of 49 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Greenbelt Division THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 441 Fourth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001, and THE STATE OF MARYLAND 200 Saint Paul Place, 20th Floor Baltimore, Maryland 21202, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 8:17-cv-1596-PJM v. DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, in his official capacity and in his individual capacity 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20500, Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT BRIAN E. FROSH KARL A. RACINE Attorney General of Maryland Attorney General for the District of Columbia STEVEN M. SULLIVAN NATALIE O. LUDAWAY Federal Bar No. 24930 Chief Deputy Attorney General [email protected] Federal Bar No. 12533 PATRICK B. HUGHES [email protected] Federal Bar No. 19492 STEPHANIE E. LITOS* [email protected] Senior Counsel to the Attorney General Assistant Attorneys General [email protected] 200 Saint Paul Place, 20th Floor 441 Fourth Street, N.W. Baltimore, MD 21202 Washington D.C. 20001 T: (410) 576-6325 T: (202) 724-6650 F: (410) 576-6955 F. (202) 741-0647 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 90-2 Filed 02/23/18 Page 2 of 49 NORMAN L. EISEN JOSEPH M. SELLERS Federal Bar No. 09460 Federal Bar No. 06284 [email protected] [email protected] NOAH D. BOOKBINDER* CHRISTINE E. WEBBER* [email protected] Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC STUART C. MCPHAIL* 1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
    [Show full text]