DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Study Initial Environmental Review: 9000 Block Highway 99, BC Prepared by: Cascade Environmental Resource Group Ltd. Unit 3 – 1005 Alpha Lake Road Whistler, BC V0N 1B1 Prepared for: 28165 Yukon Inc. 5403 Buckingham Avenue Burnaby, BC, V5E 1Z9 Project No.: 089-05-18 Date: August 1, 2019 Table of Contents Statement of Limitations ............................................................................................................................ 1 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Scope .............................................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 The Project Team ........................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Location .......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 SLRD Bylaw Zoning........................................................................................................................ 2 1.5 Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Existing Environmental Conditions ................................................................................................. 11 2.1 Historical and Existing Land Use .................................................................................................. 11 2.2 Physical Environment ................................................................................................................... 11 2.2.1 Climate .................................................................................................................................. 11 2.2.2 Geology ................................................................................................................................. 11 2.2.3 Geomorphology ..................................................................................................................... 11 2.2.4 Hydrology .............................................................................................................................. 12 2.3 Terrestrial Environment ................................................................................................................ 12 2.3.1 Soils ....................................................................................................................................... 12 2.4 Vegetation ..................................................................................................................................... 13 2.4.1 Vegetation Associations ........................................................................................................ 13 2.4.2 Biogeoclimactic Zone Classification ...................................................................................... 15 2.4.3 Terrestrial Ecosystems .......................................................................................................... 15 2.4.4 Wildlife and Wildlife Habitats ................................................................................................. 18 2.4.4.1 Wildlife ............................................................................................................................ 18 2.4.4.2 Rare and Endangered Wildlife Species ......................................................................... 19 2.4.4.3 Rare and Endangered Plant Species and Ecological Communities .............................. 24 2.4.4.4 Valued Ecosystem Components .................................................................................... 25 2.5 Aquatic Environment..................................................................................................................... 25 2.6 Socio-Economic Conditions .......................................................................................................... 26 2.6.1 Cultural and Heritage Resources .......................................................................................... 26 2.6.2 Other Undertakings in the Area ............................................................................................. 27 2.6.2.1 Mining ............................................................................................................................. 27 2.6.2.2 Recreation and Tourism ................................................................................................. 27 2.6.2.3 Anthropogenic Features ................................................................................................. 27 2.6.2.4 Adjacent Land Use ......................................................................................................... 27 IER – 9000 BLOCK HIGHWAY 99 |PREPARED FOR: 28165 YUKON INC. | FILE #: 089-05-18 | DATE: August 1, 2019 iii 3 Environmental Constraints ............................................................................................................... 29 3.1 Physical Environment ................................................................................................................... 29 3.1.1 Climate .................................................................................................................................. 29 3.1.2 Geology ................................................................................................................................. 29 3.1.3 Geomorphology ..................................................................................................................... 29 3.1.4 Hydrology .............................................................................................................................. 29 3.2 Terrestrial Environment ................................................................................................................ 29 3.2.1 Soils ....................................................................................................................................... 29 3.2.2 Vegetation ............................................................................................................................. 29 3.2.2.1 Rare and Endangered Plant Species ............................................................................. 29 3.2.2.2 Rare and Endangered Ecological Communities ............................................................ 29 3.2.3 Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat ................................................................................................... 30 3.2.3.1 Rare and Endangered Wildlife Species ......................................................................... 30 3.3 Valued Ecosystem Components .................................................................................................. 31 3.3.1 Wildlife Trees ......................................................................................................................... 31 3.3.2 Coarse Woody Debris ........................................................................................................... 31 3.3.3 Wildlife Movement Corridor ................................................................................................... 31 3.4 Aquatic Environment..................................................................................................................... 31 3.5 Socio-Economic Conditions .......................................................................................................... 31 3.5.1 Cultural and Heritage Resources .......................................................................................... 31 3.5.2 Other Undertakings in the Area ............................................................................................. 31 3.5.2.1 Timber Harvesting .......................................................................................................... 31 3.5.2.2 Mining ............................................................................................................................. 31 3.5.2.3 Recreation and Tourism ................................................................................................. 31 3.5.2.4 Anthropogenic Features ................................................................................................. 32 3.5.2.5 Adjacent Land Users ...................................................................................................... 32 4 Conclusion and Recommendations................................................................................................. 32 Literature Cited .......................................................................................................................................... 35 iv IER – 9000 BLOCK HIGHWAY 99 |PREPARED FOR: 28165 YUKON INC. | FILE #: 089-05-18 | DATE: August 1, 2019 Statement of Limitations This Document was prepared by Cascade Environmental Resource Group Ltd. for 28165 Yukon Inc.. Should this report contain an error or omission then the liability, if any, of Cascade Environmental Resource Group Ltd. should be limited to the fee received by Cascade Environmental Resource Group Ltd. for the preparation of this Document. Recommendations contained in this report reflect Cascade Environmental Resource Group Ltd.’s judgment in light of information available at the time of study. The accuracy of information provided to Cascade
Load more

Recommended publications
  • View the PDF: 10F-Ideas-Z2-Design-Facility-San
    C A S E S T U D Y D I e A s Z 2 DESIGN FACILITY t the first conceptual The team needed a fully integrated BUILDING AT A GLANCE design charrette, the design process, in which the differ- design team decided to ent design disciplines and the gen- Name IDeAs Z2 Design Facility 2 target a “Z ” goal — eral contractor make key decisions Location San Jose, Calif. Azero energy and zero carbon — to together to optimize the building as Owner Integrated Design Associates advance the state of green build- an integrated system. For example, (IDeAs) ing and to showcase the low energy carefully designed sun shading and When Built mid-1960s (originally a electrical and lighting design skills state-of-the-art glazing would allow bank branch office) of the client. For the project to be the team to make many incisions Major Renovation 2007 Renovation Scope Skylights, window replicable, the team wanted a low into the roof and concrete walls to walls, upgraded insulation and energy building that uses exist- harvest more daylight. This would glazing, high-efficiency HVAC system, high-efficiency lighting and office equip- ing technology at a reasonable cost reduce the need for electric lighting ment, rooftop and canopy photovoltaic premium. By maximizing efficiency and its attendant energy consump- system, monitoring equipment of building systems before sizing tion, while also providing outside Principal Use Commercial office the photovoltaic arrays to cover the views for building occupants. Occupants 15 remaining loads, the costs were kept Team members collaborated on Gross Square Footage 7,000 to a minimum.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Scale Analysis of the Surface Layer Urban Heat Island Effect in Five Higher Density Precincts of Central Sydney
    Sharifi, E., Philipp, C., & Lehmann, S. (2015). Multi-scale analysis of the surface layer urban heat island effect in five higher density precincts of central Sydney. In S. Lehmann (Ed.), Low Carbon Cities (pp. 375-393). New York: Routledge. Chapter 21 Multi-scale analysis of the surface layer urban heat island effect in five higher density precincts of central Sydney Ehsan Sharifi, Conrad Philipp and Steffen Lehmann Summary The urban heat island (UHI) effect is invariably present in cities, mainly due to increased urbanisation. It can result in higher urban densities being significantly hotter (frequently more than 4°C, even up to 10°C) than their peri-urban surroundings. Urban structure and land cover are key contributors to the surface layer urban heat island (sUHI) effect at city and district scale. This research aims to explore which urban configurations can make urban precincts and their microclimates more resilient to the dangerous sUHI effect. In the context of the city of Sydney, Australia, the research aims to explore the most heat resilient urban features for neighbourhoods, at precinct scale. The investigation examines five high density precincts in central Sydney. The analysis of these precincts is based on remote sensing thermal data of two independent sources: a nocturnal remote-sensing thermal image of central Sydney on 6 February 2009 and a diurnal Landsat 7– ETM+ data from 2008-2009. Comparing the surface temperature of streetscape and buildings’ rooftop feature layers indicates that open spaces are the urban elements most sensitive to the sUHI effect. Therefore, the correlations between street network intensity, open public space ratio, and urban greenery plot ratio and sUHI effect are being analysed in the five high density precincts selected.
    [Show full text]
  • Canopy Microclimate Modification for the Cultivar Shiraz II. Effects on Must and Wine Composition
    Vitis 24, 119-128 (1985) Roseworthy Agricultural College, Roseworth y, South Australia South Australian Department of Agriculture, Adelaide, South Austraha Canopy microclimate modification for the cultivar Shiraz II. Effects on must and wine composition by R. E. SMART!), J. B. ROBINSON, G. R. DUE and c. J. BRIEN Veränderungen des Mikroklimas der Laubwand bei der Rebsorte Shiraz II. Beeinflussung der Most- und Weinzusammensetzung Z u sam menfa ss u n g : Bei der Rebsorte Shiraz wurde das Ausmaß der Beschattung innerha lb der Laubwand künstlich durch vier Behandlungsformen sowie natürlicherweise durch e ine n Wachstumsgradienten variiert. Beschattung bewirkte in den Traubenmosten eine Erniedri­ gung de r Zuckergehalte und eine Erhöhung der Malat- und K-Konzentrationen sowie der pH-Werte. Die Weine dieser Moste wiesen ebenfalls höhere pH- und K-Werte sowie einen venin­ gerten Anteil ionisierter Anthocyane auf. Statistische Berechnungen ergaben positive Korrelatio­ nen zwischen hohen pH- und K-Werten in Most und Wein einerseits u11d der Beschattung der Laubwand andererseits; die Farbintensität sowie die Konzentrationen der gesamten und ionisier­ ten Anthocyane und der Phenole waren mit der Beschattung negativ korreliert. Zur Beschreibung der Lichtverhältnisse in der Laubwand wurde ei11 Bonitierungsschema, das sich auf acht Merkmale stützt, verwendet; die hiermit gewonne nen Ergebnisse korrelierten mit Zucker, pH- und K-Werten des Mostes sowie mit pH, Säure, K, Farbintensität, gesamten und ionj­ sierten Anthocyanen und Phenolen des Weines. Starkwüchsige Reben lieferten ähnliche Werte der Most- und Weinzusammensetzung wie solche mit künstlicher Beschattung. K e y wo r d s : climate, light, growth, must quality, wine quality, malic acid, potassium, aci­ dity, anthocyanjn.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky Viticultural Regions and Suggested Cultivars S
    HO-88 Kentucky Viticultural Regions and Suggested Cultivars S. Kaan Kurtural and Patsy E. Wilson, Department of Horticulture, University of Kentucky; Imed E. Dami, Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University rapes grown in Kentucky are sub- usually more harmful to grapevines than Even in established fruit growing areas, ject to environmental stresses that steady cool temperatures. temperatures occasionally reach critical reduceG crop yield and quality, and injure Mesoclimate is the climate of the vine- levels and cause significant damage. The and kill grapevines. Damaging critical yard site affected by its local topography. moderate hardiness of grapes increases winter temperatures, late spring frosts, The topography of a given site, including the likelihood for damage since they are short growing seasons, and extreme the absolute elevation, slope, aspect, and the most cold-sensitive of the temperate summer temperatures all occur with soils, will greatly affect the suitability of fruit crops. regularity in regions of Kentucky. How- a proposed site. Mesoclimate is much Freezing injury, or winterkill, oc- ever, despite the challenging climate, smaller in area than macroclimate. curs as a result of permanent parts of certain species and cultivars of grapes Microclimate is the environment the grapevine being damaged by sub- are grown commercially in Kentucky. within and around the canopy of the freezing temperatures. This is different The aim of this bulletin is to describe the grapevine. It is described by the sunlight from spring freeze damage that kills macroclimatic features affecting grape exposure, air temperature, wind speed, emerged shoots and flower buds. Thus, production that should be evaluated in and wetness of leaves and clusters.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Microclimate Variations in Two Australian Feedlots
    Measuring Microclimate Variations In Two Australian Feedlots Project number FLOT.310 Final Report prepared for MLA by: E.A. Systems Pty Limited PO Box W1029 16 Queen Elizabeth Drive ARMIDALE NSW 2350 Meat and Livestock Australia Ltd Locked Bag 991 North Sydney NSW 2059 ISBN 1 74036 761 8 YSTEMS Pty Limited E.A. S Environmental & Agricultural Science & Engineering May 2001 MLA makes no representation as to the accuracy of any information or advice contained in this document and excludes all liability, whether in contract, tort (including negligence or breach of statutory duty) or otherwise as a result of reliance by any person on such information or advice. MLA © 2004 ABN 39 081 678 364 1 Measuring Microclimate Variations in Two Australian Feedlots ABSTRACT Heat stress has caused catastrophic stock losses infrequently in Australia and does cause production losses over summers. While a considerable body of research has been undertaken on defining heat stress with respect to cattle comfort, health and production, few data are available on the micrometeorological characteristics of feedlots, shaded pens in feedlots and differences between feedlots and their surrounds. A study was undertaken to define these microclimates and therefore to identify the probable causes of heat stress. The study found that feedlot climates are different to their surrounds. Generally they are hotter and more humid and have lower wind speeds under shade. The study found that shade benefit cattle by reducing radiation heat loads but have the deleterious effects of increasing manure moisture contents, relative humidity and ammonia levels. Ammonia is identified as a possible stressor but its importance must be further defined.
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria Mara Heilweil Photographic Artist, Curator, Educator 3270 20Th Street San Francisco, CA 94110
    Victoria Mara Heilweil Photographic Artist, Curator, Educator 3270 20th Street San Francisco, CA 94110 (510) 918-4631 [email protected] www.victoriaheilweil.com Education 1995 MFA PHOTOGRAPHY California College of Arts and Crafts, Oakland, CA 1987 BFA FILM AND VIDEO New York University, New York, NY Recent Exhibitions 2019 BONE BLACK, group exhibition, DZINE Gallery, San Francisco, CA TEMPLE OF DIRECTION, group exhibition in collaboration with Phil Spitler, Burning Man Festival, Black Rock City, NV WATER MUSIC, group exhibition, DZINE Gallery, San Francisco, CA ORDINARY, group exhibition, Art Works Downtown, San Rafael, CA 2018 REASON AND REVERIE, group exhibition, Natalie and James Thompson Gallery, San Jose State University, CA Curator: Aaron Wilder DROP, solo exhibition, Art Works Downtown, San Rafael, CA EXPOSURE 2018: TO THOSE WHO SERVE, group exhibition, New Hope Arts, New Hope, PA WONDERSPACES, group exhibition in collaboration with Phil Spitler, San Diego, CA stARTup Art Fair, San Francisco, CA CURATED FRIDGE WINTER 2018, group exhibition, Cambridge, MA Juror: J. Sybylla Smith IMOTIF, group exhibition, Sohn Fine Art Gallery, Lenox, MA WHAT KEEPS YOU UP AT NIGHT?, group exhibition, Mendocino College Art Gallery, Ukiah, CA Curator: Tomiko Jones 2017 SIZE MATTERS, group exhibition, Helmuth Projects in conjunction with Medium Festival of Photography, San Diego, CA Juror: Katherine Ware, Photography Curator, Santa Fe Museum of Art COMMUNITY SOURCE(D), solo exhibition in collaboration with Mobile Arts Platform: Peter Foucault
    [Show full text]
  • Doppler Lidar Measurements of Boundary Layer Heights Over San Jose, California
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Theses Master's Theses and Graduate Research Fall 2017 Doppler LiDAR Measurements of Boundary Layer Heights Over San Jose, California Matthew Robert Lloyd San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses Recommended Citation Lloyd, Matthew Robert, "Doppler LiDAR Measurements of Boundary Layer Heights Over San Jose, California" (2017). Master's Theses. 4880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.w6tv-6x88 https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/4880 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses and Graduate Research at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DOPPLER LIDAR MEASUREMENTS OF BOUNDARY LAYER HEIGHTS OVER SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Meteorology and Climate Science San José State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by Matthew R. Lloyd December 2017 © 2017 Matthew R. Lloyd ALL RIGHTS RESERVED The Designated Thesis Committee Approves the Thesis Titled DOPPLER LIDAR MEASUREMENTS OF BOUNDARY LAYER HEIGHTS OVER SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA by Matthew R. Lloyd APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATE SCIENCE SAN JOSÉ STATE UNIVERSITY December 2017 Dr. Craig Clements Department of Meteorology and Climate Science Dr. Martin Leach Department of Meteorology and Climate Science Dr. Neil Lareau Department of Meteorology and Climate Science ABSTRACT DOPPLER LIDAR MEASUREMENTS OF BOUNDARY LAYER HEIGHTS OVER SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA by Matthew R.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Canopy Microclimate, Season and Region on Sauvignon Blanc Grape Composition and Wine Quality J
    Effect of Canopy Microclimate, Season and Region on Sauvignon blanc Grape Composition and Wine Quality J. Marais, J.J. Hunter and P.D. Haasbroek ARC-Fruit, Vine and Wine Research Institute, Nietvoorbij Centre for Vine and Wine, Private Bag X5026, 7599 Stellenbosch, South Africa Submitted for publication: February 1999 Accepted for publication: May 1999 Key words: Microclimate, season, region, Sauvignon blanc, aroma, wine quality The effect of canopy microclimate on the grape aroma composition and wine quality of Sauvignon blanc was inves- tigated in three climatically-different regions, i.e. in the Stellenbosch (1996 and 1997 season), Robertson and Elgin regions (1997 and 1998 season). A canopy shade treatment altering microclimate in a natural way, was applied to Sauvignon blanc vineyards in the three regions. Control vines were not manipulated. The concentrations of aroma compounds in the grapes, namely monoterpenes, C 13-norisoprenoids and 2-methoxy-3-isobutylpyrazine, were determined weekly during the respective ripening periods. Solar radiation above and within the canopies as well as temperature within the canopies were also measured continually during the ripening periods. The highest canopy solar radiation, temperature, and monoterpene and C 13-norisoprenoid concentrations were found for the control treatments, followed by the shaded treatments. An opposite tendency was found for 2-methoxy-3-isobutylpyrazine, which is one of the most important components responsible for the typical green pepper/asparagus aroma of Sauvignon blanc. There appears to be a relationship between chemical and microclimatic data in each region and over seasons. Marked temperature and aroma component concentration differences were observed among the three regions during the cool 1997 season, which manifested in wine aroma parameters such as fruitiness and vegeta- tive/asparagus/green pepper nuances.
    [Show full text]
  • Microclimate Preferences of the Grey-Headed Flying Fox (Pteropus Poliocephalus) in the Sydney Region
    WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository 2011 Microclimate Preferences of the Grey-Headed Flying Fox (Pteropus poliocephalus) in the Sydney Region Stephanie T. Snoyman Macquarie University Culum Brown Macquarie University Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/acwp_asie Part of the Animal Studies Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, and the Population Biology Commons Recommended Citation Snoyman, S., & Brown, C. (2011). Microclimate preferences of the grey-headed flying fox (Pteropus poliocephalus) in the Sydney region. Australian Journal of Zoology, 58(6), 376-383. This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Microclimate preferences of the grey-headed flying fox (Pteropus poliocephalus) in the Sydney region Stephanie Snoyman and Culum Brown Macquarie University KEYWORDS bat, behaviour, conservation, roost selection, urban ecology ABSTRACT The population size of the grey-headed flying fox (Pteropus poliocephalus) has decreased dramatically as a result of a variety of threatening processes. This species spends a great proportion of time in roosting large social aggregations in urban areas, causing conflict between wildlife and humans. Little is known about why these bats choose to roost in some locations in preference to others. Roost selection by cave- dwelling bats can be greatly influenced by microclimatic variables; however, far less is known about microclimate selection in tree-roosting species despite the direct management implications. This study aimed to determine the microclimate characteristics of P. poliocephalus camps. Temperature and humidity data were collected via data-loggers located both in six camps and the bushland immediately adjacent to the camps in the greater Sydney region.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Area Climate & Energy Resilience Project Stakeholder Interview
    Bay Area Climate & Energy Resilience Project Stakeholder Interview Summary Key Findings & Selected Projects FINAL Report — March 2013 Bruce Riordan Climate Consultant Bay Area Joint Policy Committee 1 Executive Summary This paper summarizes input received through interviews and group discussions conducted by the Joint Policy Committee’s Climate Consultant with more than 100 Bay Area climate adaptation stakeholders in late 2012 and early 2013. The stakeholder input centers around three topics: (a) current adaptation projects underway in the region, (b) what an organization needs to move forward on climate adaptation in 2013 and (c) what we need to do together on Bay Area climate impacts – including sea level rise, extreme storms, heat waves, energy/water shortages, price increases on food/energy and ocean acidification. The findings point to actions that will support the Regional Sea Level Rise Strategy (building resilient shorelines), advance projects that are underway on a range of topics, assist individual agencies/organizations in their planning efforts, and create a much stronger, coordinated regional approach to climate adaptation. The interview summary is presented in three sections. First, we present four near- universal needs that were expressed, in some form, by nearly every stakeholder or group. Second, we group the hundreds of good suggestions for action into twelve basic strategies. Third, we spotlight (Appendix A) nearly 100 adaptation projects, programs and initiatives already underway in the Bay Area. Finally, we offer 5 recommended next steps to move from this stakeholder input to developing a strong and action-oriented Bay Area adaptation program. 1 DISCLAIMER: THE RECOMMENDATIONS, OPINIONS AND FINDINGS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT SOLELY REFLECT THE VIEWS OF STAKEHOLDERS INTERVIEWED AS RECORDED AND EDITED BY THE JOINT POLICY COMMITTEE’S CLIMATE CONSULTANT.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of a Denser City Over the Urban Microclimate: the Case of Toronto
    sustainability Article The Effect of a Denser City over the Urban Microclimate: The Case of Toronto Umberto Berardi 1,* and Yupeng Wang 2 1 Faculty of Engineering and Architectural Science, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada 2 School of Human Settlements and Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-416-979-5000 (ext. 3263) Academic Editors: Matheos Santamouris and Constantinos Cartalis Received: 14 July 2016; Accepted: 17 August 2016; Published: 19 August 2016 Abstract: In the last decades, several studies have revealed how critical the urban heat island (UHI) effect can be in cities located in cold climates, such as the Canadian one. Meanwhile, many researchers have looked at the impact of the city design over the urban microclimate, and have raised concerns about the development of too dense cities. Under the effect of the “Places to Growth” plan, the city of Toronto is experiencing one of the highest rates of building development in North America. Over 48,000 and 33,000 new home permits were issued in 2012 and 2013 respectively, and at the beginning of 2015, almost 500 high-rise proposals across the Greater Toronto Area were released. In this context, it is important to investigate how new constructions will affect the urban microclimate, and to propose strategies to mitigate possible UHI effects. Using the software ENVI-met, microclimate simulations for the Church-Yonge corridor both in the current situation and with the new constructions are reported in this paper. The outdoor air temperature and the wind speed are the parameters used to assess the outdoor microclimate changes.
    [Show full text]
  • SITE-SPECIFIC WEATHER FILES and FINE-SCALE PROBABILISTIC MICROCLIMATE ZONES for CURRENT and FUTURE CLIMATES and LAND USE ( for E
    Published in IBPSA World News, Volume 30, No. 2, pp. 29 – 41 (October 2020) www.ibpsa.org/Newsletter/IBPSANews-30-2.pdf SITE-SPECIFIC WEATHER FILES AND FINE-SCALE PROBABILISTIC MICROCLIMATE ZONES FOR CURRENT AND FUTURE CLIMATES AND LAND USE ( for energy modeling, analysis, forecasting, and LEED ) Haider Taha Altostratus Inc. [email protected] -- www.altostratus.com A. Preamble It is well-known that urban areas, depending on extents and physical / geometrical characteristics, create distinct climates and intra-urban microclimate variabilities that are typically very significant and sometimes of the same magnitude as inter-regional differences in climate (Taha 2017, 2015a,b, 2020a,b). These intra-urban variations can significantly affect energy use, thermal environmental conditions, heat- health, emissions, and air quality (Taha 2017). Translating climate effects into energy-use equivalents and developing weather files to account for these effects is an on-going endeavor pursued across the industry, research, and academic spectrum, e.g., Crawley (2007); Huang (2010, 2016); Hong et al. (2016, 2017); Dickinson and Brannon (2016); Bueno et al. (2011); Jentsch et al. (2015); New et al. (2018); Nair et al. (2020); and Mylona et al. (2012), among others. Accurate, site-specific microclimate characterizations are critical in the design of new buildings or retrofits; in building code or certification compliance; in testing building performance under a range of weather conditions; and in deploying energy technologies that will be equally effective in current and changing climates (Herrera et al. 2017; Alfaro et al. 2004; Taha 2015a,b; de Wilde and Coley 2012). Currently, however, most weather input to building energy models does not explicitly take into account the effects of such fine-scale intra-urban variations or the specific micrometeorological fields at a site of interest.
    [Show full text]