DOCSLIB.ORG

Time and Traffic Survey Report – Mirama/Kagitumba Border and Ntungamo Junction – Mbarara – Kabale Road

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Time and Traffic Survey Report – Mirama/Kagitumba Border and Ntungamo Junction – Mbarara – Kabale Road TIME AND TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT – MIRAMA/KAGITUMBA BORDER AND NTUNGAMO JUNCTION – MBARARA – KABALE ROAD [FINAL REPORT] Consultant: Lillian Muhebwa P. O. Box 27808 Kampala EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the findings from the time and traffic survey undertaken in May 2012 at the Mirama-Kagitumba border crossing as well as results of the traffic and route preference survey at the Ntungamo junction on Mbarara-Kabale road. Mirama-Kagitumba border is one of the two main transit points connecting Uganda and Rwanda with the border towns located in southwestern Uganda and Nyagatare district, Eastern Province of Rwanda respectively. The study sought to establish the queuing time and time taken to clear commercial trucks at the border crossing, baseline traffic volume statistics, preferred routes travelled by traffic at the border as well as the anticipated increase in traffic due to upgrading of the Ntungamo-Mirama road. The Mirama-Kagitumba border crossing had a total traffic of 408 vehicles during the survey week, most of which was from the Kagitumba side. Traffic at this border is mainly day time traffic corresponding to the operational hours of the customs offices. Total traffic inward from Mirama was 115 vehicles predominantly of the commercial traffic category. Inward traffic at Kagitumba was recorded as 193 vehicles with passenger vehicles making up 67% of this traffic. Preferred travel routes are intercity, that is connecting Kampala and Kigali which are the main commercial hubs for the two countries Relatively short queue times (three to thirty seven minutes) were experienced for traffic arriving during border operation hours given the low daily commercial vehicle traffic averaging about ten vehicles on either side. Queues are generally shorter on the Kagitumba side, hardly exceeding 15 minutes. However, the low traffic volumes do not present any urgency on transporters to start the clearing process; otherwise these queue times would be lower. The average customs processing time for trucks from Mirama entering into Rwanda was three hours fifty one minutes and that from Kagitumba, one hour thirty two minutes. The longer processing times for traffic from Mirama can be attributed to more import traffic into Rwanda as compared to Uganda in addition to non-readiness of transporters to clear with customs. The Ntungamo-Kabale junction on Mbarara-Kabale road receives significant day time traffic volumes with 5271 vehicles recorded during the survey week. This is equivalent to 753 vehicles per day out of which 34% is commercial traffic - as defined for this survey. The Origin-destination survey indicated that 40% of this traffic (439 vehicles) passes the Katuna border with Heavy Goods Vehicles (HGV) above 8T contributing 41% of this traffic, 32% trailer trucks, 14% fuel tankers and light trucks and coaches contribute 8% and 5% respectively. Results of the route preference surveys for traffic bound for Katuna indicated that at least 24% of this traffic would be diverted to the Mirama route if upgraded. This corresponds to almost three times the current commercial traffic volume handled at the border requiring improved infrastructure and high efficiency levels of border operations in order to contribute to the realization of benefits from improved trade competitiveness in the East Africa region. 1 | P a g e Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 1 ACRONYMS AND KEY DEFINITIONS .......................................................................................................... 3 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 ASSIGNMENT OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................ 4 2 COMPONENT 1: TIME SURVEY ......................................................................................................... 7 2.1 OBJECTIVE ................................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 SURVEY RESULTS ...................................................................................................................... 9 2.3.1 Time survey at Mirama Hills.............................................................................................. 9 2.3.2 Time survey at Kagitumba .............................................................................................. 12 3 COMPONENT 2: TRAFFIC SURVEY................................................................................................... 15 3.1 OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................ 16 3.2 METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................................... 16 3.3 SURVEY RESULTS .................................................................................................................... 16 3.3.1 Mirama Hills Traffic ........................................................................................................ 16 3.3.2 Kagitumba Traffic ........................................................................................................... 20 3.3.3 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 23 4 COMPONENT 3: TRAFFIC SURVEY AT NTUNGAMO JUNCTION ........................................................ 25 4.1 OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................ 25 4.2 METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................................... 25 4.3 SURVEY RESULTS .................................................................................................................... 25 4.3.1 Traffic analysis ................................................................................................................ 25 4.3.2 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 33 Annex I: Data collection forms ............................................................................................................... 34 Annex II: Traffic Volume – Mirama Hills .................................................................................................. 36 Annex II: Traffic Volume – Mirama Hills .................................................................................................. 36 Annex III: Traffic Volume – Kagitumba .................................................................................................... 37 Annex IV: record of vehicles at day start – Mirama/Kagitumba ............................................................... 38 Annex V: Commercial Traffic Origin-Destination – Ntungamo junction ................................................... 39 2 | P a g e ACRONYMS AND KEY DEFINITIONS CCA – Customs clearing Area HGV – Heavy Goods vehicle OSBP – One stop Border Posts RRA - Rwanda Revenue Authority TMEA – Trade Mark East Africa TOR – Terms of Reference URA – Uganda Revenue Authority 3 | P a g e 1 INTRODUCTION This report presents the findings of the traffic survey conducted at the Mirama/Kagitumba border crossing between Uganda and Rwanda, in their respective districts of Ntungamo and Nyagatare. The study was commissioned by Trade Mark East Africa (TMEA) as part of planning, and monitoring and evaluation of its projects in particular the one-stop border post (OSBP) project aimed at reducing transport and related costs along the key transport corridors in East Africa. 1.1 ASSIGNMENT OBJECTIVES This study was aimed at obtaining baseline traffic statistics and in accordance with the assignment TOR comprised three key components as described hereafter. Components 1 and 2 relate to the time and traffic study at the Mirama Hills/Kagitumba border and component three relates to the traffic study at Ntungamo. The study components are detailed below: a) Component 1: Traffic Queuing and Clearance Time Study This involved carrying out a traffic study to find out the queuing time and time taken to clear commercial trucks at the border crossing. b) Component 2: Traffic Volume Study at Mirama Hills/Kagitumba border This involved carrying out a traffic study to determine the number of vehicles passing through the border post and Origin and Destination Studies to determine the amount of travel existing between various locations and determine the routes along which traffic prefers to travel. The traffic study would then be used to estimate the ultimate volume at the end of the design period [of 20 years] c) Study 3: Traffic Volume Study at Ntungamo Junction on the Mbarara-Kabale Road This involved carrying out the traffic study to determine the current traffic flow from Uganda at the Ntungamo junction towards the Katuna border, as well as the anticipated increase in traffic due to upgrading works on the Ntungamo-Mirama road. In addition an Origin and Destination study to determine the amount of traffic destined for the Katuna border was undertaken. This was anticipated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Republic of Uganda (Ministry of Works And
    THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA (MINISTRY OF WORKS AND TRANSPORT COMPONENT) IDA CREDIT NO.4147 UG REPORT OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE EAST AFRICA TRADE AND TRANSPORT FACILITATION PROJECT (EATTFP) FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30TH JUNE, 2015 OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL UGANDA TABLE OF CONTENTS REPORT OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30TH JUNE 2015 ...................................................................................................................... iv REPORT OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL ON THE SPECIAL ACCOUNT OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30TH JUNE 2015 ........................................................................................................... vi 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................... 1 3.0 PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND COMPONENTS .......................................................................... 1 4.0 AUDIT OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................. 2 5.0 AUDIT PROCEDURES PERFORMED ........................................................................................ 3 6.0 CATEGORIZATION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ............................................................... 4 6.2 Summary of Findings ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Interventions Report Financial Year 2019/20
    COVID-19 Interventions Report Financial Year 2019/20 October 2020 Budget Monitoring and Accountability Unit (BMAU) Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development P.O. Box 8147, Kampala www.finance.go.ug Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Methodology .................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Sector Performance .............................................................................................................. 2 2.1Agriculture Sector ............................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Education and Sports Sector ............................................................................................ 2 2.3 Health Sector .................................................................................................................... 7 2.3.1 Financial Performance................................................................................................... 7 2.3.2 Overall performance ...................................................................................................... 9 2.3.3 Detailed Performance by output for GoU Support........................................................ 9 2.3.4 Contingency Emergency Response Component (CERC) towards COVID-19 by the World Bank ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • STATEMENT by H.E. Yoweri Kaguta Museveni President of the Republic
    STATEMENT by H.E. Yoweri Kaguta Museveni President of the Republic of Uganda At The Annual Budget Conference - Financial Year 2016/17 For Ministers, Ministers of State, Head of Public Agencies and Representatives of Local Governments November11, 2015 - UICC Serena 1 H.E. Vice President Edward Ssekandi, Prime Minister, Rt. Hon. Ruhakana Rugunda, I was informed that there is a Budgeting Conference going on in Kampala. My campaign schedule does not permit me to attend that conference. I will, instead, put my views on paper regarding the next cycle of budgeting. As you know, I always emphasize prioritization in budgeting. Since 2006, when the Statistics House Conference by the Cabinet and the NRM Caucus agreed on prioritization, you have seen the impact. Using the Uganda Government money, since 2006, we have either partially or wholly funded the reconstruction, rehabilitation of the following roads: Matugga-Semuto-Kapeeka (41kms); Gayaza-Zirobwe (30km); Kabale-Kisoro-Bunagana/Kyanika (101 km); Fort Portal- Bundibugyo-Lamia (103km); Busega-Mityana (57km); Kampala –Kalerwe (1.5km); Kalerwe-Gayaza (13km); Bugiri- Malaba/Busia (82km); Kampala-Masaka-Mbarara (416km); Mbarara-Ntungamo-Katuna (124km); Gulu-Atiak (74km); Hoima-Kaiso-Tonya (92km); Jinja-Mukono (52km); Jinja- Kamuli (58km); Kawempe-Kafu (166km); Mbarara-Kikagati- Murongo Bridge (74km); Nyakahita-Kazo-Ibanda-Kamwenge (143km); Tororo-Mbale-Soroti (152km); Vurra-Arua-Koboko- Oraba (92km). 2 We are also, either planning or are in the process of constructing, re-constructing or rehabilitating
    [Show full text]
  • Contact List for District Health O Cers & District Surveillance Focal Persons
    THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA MINISTRY OF HEALTH Contact List for District Health Ocers & District Surveillance Focal Persons THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA MINISTRY OF HEALTH FIRST NAME LAST NAME E-MAIL ADDRESS DISTRICT TITLE MOBILEPHONE Adunia Anne [email protected] ADJUMANI DHO 772992437 Olony Paul [email protected] ADJUMANI DSFP 772878005 Emmanuel Otto [email protected] AGAGO DHO 772380481 Odongkara Christopher [email protected] AGAGO DSFP 782556650 Okello Quinto [email protected] AMOLATAR DHO 772586080 Mundo Okello [email protected] AMOLATAR DSFP 772934056 Sagaki Pasacle [email protected] AMUDAT DHO 772316596 Elimu Simon [email protected] AMUDAT DSFP 752728751 Wala Maggie [email protected] AMURIA DHO 784905657 Olupota Ocom [email protected] AMURIA DSFP 771457875 Odong Patrick [email protected] AMURU DHO 772840732 Okello Milton [email protected] AMURU DSFP 772969499 Emer Mathew [email protected] APAC DHO 772406695 Oceng Francis [email protected] APAC DSFP 772356034 Anguyu Patrick [email protected] ARUA DHO 772696200 Aguakua Anthony [email protected] ARUA DSFP 772198864 Immelda Tumuhairwe [email protected] BUDUDA DHO 772539170 Zelesi Wakubona [email protected] BUDUDA DSFP 782573807 Kiirya Stephen [email protected] BUGIRI DHO 772432918 Magoola Peter [email protected] BUGIRI DSFP 772574808 Peter Muwereza [email protected] BUGWERI DHO 782553147 Umar Mabodhe [email protected] BUGWERI DSFP 775581243 Turyasingura Wycliffe [email protected] BUHWEJU DHO 773098296 Bemera Amon [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • The Informal Cross Border Trade Qualitative Baseline Study 2008 Uganda Bureau of Statistics
    UGANDA BUREAU OF STATISTICS THE INFORMAL CROSS BORDER TRADE QUALIT ATIVE BASELINE STUDY 2008 February 2009 FOREWORD The Qualitative Module of the Informal Cross Border Trade (ICBT) Survey is the first comprehensive Study of its kind to be conducted in Uganda to bridge information gaps regarding informal trade environment. The study was carried out at Busia, Mirama Hills, Mpondwe and Mutukula border posts. The ICBT Qualitative study collected information on informal trade environment and the constraints traders’ experience in order to guide policy formulation, planning and decision making in the informal cross border sub-sector. The study focused specifically on gender roles in ICBT, access to financial services, marketing information, food security, and tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade among others. This study was conducted alongside the ICBT Quantitative Module that collected information on the nature of products transacted, their volumes and value, and, the direction of trade. Notwithstanding the significant contribution informal cross border trade has made to the welfare of the people of the East African region (in terms of employment creation, economic empowerment of women, food security, regional and social integration), there are no appropriate policies designed to guide players in the informal trade sector. The information gathered, therefore, will provide an insight into the challenges informal traders face in their day to day business and will guide policy and decision makers to enact appropriate policies to harness the potential benefits of informal cross border trade. The Bureau is grateful to the Integrated Framework (IF) through TRACE Project of the Ministry of Tourism, Trade and Industry for the financial contribution that facilitated the study.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study of Rufuuha Wetland, Ntungamo District
    Land Restoration Training Programme Keldnaholt, 112 Reykjavik, Iceland Final project 2018 ASSESSING THE PERCEPTION OF FRINGE COMMUNITIES ON WETLAND MANAGEMENT IN UGANDA: CASE STUDY OF RUFUUHA WETLAND, NTUNGAMO DISTRICT Dinnah Tumwebaze Ntungamo District Local Government P.O Box 01 Ntungamo [email protected] Supervisor Victor Pajuelo Madrigal SVARMI [email protected] ABSTRACT To ensure the health and wellbeing of the human population, wetlands should be managed sustainably to continue the services they provide and the justifiable exploitation of the earth’s resources. Cautious action needs to be directed towards the maintenance of the significant support systems of the ecosystem services on the globe, such as wetlands. This study aimed to assess the perception of fringe communities on the management of the Rufuuha wetland, Ntungamo District in south-western Uganda. The methodologies used in this study included simple random sampling. Results indicated that the state of Rufuuha wetland has been notably influenced by a lack of awareness of the wetland laws and regulations and a high local illiteracy level on sustainable wetland management. There is a need for sensitization of the community and an encouraging bottom-up approach in formulation and implementation of wetland laws. Key words: Perception, fringe community, wetland management, Ntungamo District. UNU Land Restoration Training Programme This paper should be cited as: Tumwebaze D (2018) Assessing the perception of fringe communities on wetland management Uganda: A case study of Rufuuha wetland, Ntungamo District. United Nations University Land Restoration Training Programme [final project] http://www.unulrt.is/static/fellows/document/tumwebeze2018.pdf ii UNU Land Restoration Training Programme TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • List of URA Service Offices Callcenter Toll Free Line: 0800117000 Email: [email protected] Facebook: @Urapage Twitter: @Urauganda
    List of URA Service Offices Callcenter Toll free line: 0800117000 Email: [email protected] Facebook: @URApage Twitter: @URAuganda CENTRAL REGION ( Kampala, Wakiso, Entebbe, Mukono) s/n Station Location Tax Heads URA Head URA Tower , plot M 193/4 Nakawa Industrial Ara, 1 Domestic Taxes/Customs Office P.O. Box 7279, Kampala 2 Katwe Branch Finance Trust Bank, Plot No 115 & 121. Domestic Taxes 3 Bwaise Branch Diamond Trust Bank,Bombo Road Domestic Taxes 4 William Street Post Bank, Plot 68/70 Domestic Taxes Nakivubo 5 Diamond Trust Bank,Ham Shopping Domestic Taxes Branch United Bank of Africa- Aponye Hotel Building Plot 6 William Street Domestic Taxes 17 7 Kampala Road Diamond Trust Building opposite Cham Towers Domestic Taxes 8 Mukono Mukono T.C Domestic Taxes 9 Entebbe Entebbe Kitooro Domestic Taxes 10 Entebbe Entebbe Arrivals section, Airport Customs Nansana T.C, Katonda ya bigera House Block 203 11 Nansana Domestic Taxes Nansana Hoima road Plot 125; Next to new police station 12 Natete Domestic Taxes Natete Birus Mall Plot 1667; KyaliwajalaNamugongoKira Road - 13 Kyaliwajala Domestic Taxes Martyrs Mall. NORTHERN REGION ( East Nile and West Nile) s/n Station Location Tax Heads 1 Vurra Vurra (UG/DRC-Border) Customs 2 Pakwach Pakwach TC Customs 3 Goli Goli (UG/DRC- Border) Customs 4 Padea Padea (UG/DRC- Border) Customs 5 Lia Lia (UG/DRC - Border) Customs 6 Oraba Oraba (UG/S Sudan-Border) Customs 7 Afogi Afogi (UG/S Sudan – Border) Customs 8 Elegu Elegu (UG/S Sudan – Border) Customs 9 Madi-opei Kitgum S/Sudan - Border Customs 10 Kamdini Corner
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Land Tenure and Land Use Planning in the Six Kagera TAMP Districts in Uganda
    A Review of Land Tenure and Land use Planning in the six Kagera TAMP Districts in Uganda BdBernard BhBashaas ha School of Agricultural Sciences, Makerere University. Outline of Presentation Background Objective and Methodology Research Questions PliiPreliminary Fi Fidindings Land tenure structure Background KLKey Laws and regu lati ons rel ati ng t o th e ownership, management and transfer of land and re ltdlated resources i n Ug Uand a. The Constitution • The Land Act (1998), • The Land regulations of 2004 • The Physical planning Act of 2010. This act specifically provides for the design and implementation of land use plans. Background cont’d Other Relevant Laws: • The land acquisition Act, • The Water Act and associated water resources regulati on s, • The National Forestry and tree planting Act (2003), • The National Environment Regulations (2001), • The mortgage Act, • the registration of titles Act and the rent restriction Act. Objective & Methodology Object ive To achieve a deeper understanding of the land tenure structure andld land use p lanni ng i n th e six Kagera TAMP districts Highlight the constraints and identify the opportun ities f or pri ority it acti on. Methodology A combination of literature review and key informant interviews with district level staff. Research Questions What is the current land tenure structure and its distribution in Uganda and in the six districts of the Kagera TAMP project? What are the strategies and plans in place to improve the land tenure structure in Uganda and in the six Kagera TAMP project districts, in particular? Do land use plans exist at the National level and in the six Kagera TAMP project districts? HdhiildHow do the existing land use pl ans compare (i n content, design process (approach) and coordination arrangements) with best practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Mogondo Julius Wondero EOEIYE
    d/ TELEPHONES: 04L434OLO0l4340LL2 Minister of State for East E.MAIL: [email protected] African Community Affairs TELEFAX: o4t4-348r7t 1't Floor, Postal Building Yusuf Lule Road ln any correspondence on this subject P.O. Box 7343, Kampala please quote No: ADM 542/583/01 UGANDA rHE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA 22"4 August,2Ol9 FTHES P ( L \-, 4 Hon. Oumo George Abott U Choirperson, Committee for 2019 * 2 3 AUG s Eost Africon Community Affoirs Porlioment of Ugondo EOEIYE L t4 raE \, \, KAMPATA NT OF CLOSURE OF UGANDA.RWANDA BORDERS Reference is mode to letter AB: I 171287 /01 doted l5rn August,20l9 oddressed to the Minister of Eost Africon Community Affoirs ond copied to the Permonent Secretory, Ministry of Eost Africon Community Affoirs regording the obove subject motter. ln the letter, you invited the Ministry to updote the EAC Committee on the progress mode to hondle the Closure of Ugondo-Rwondo Borders on Ihursdoy,29r,August, 2019 at 10.00om. As stoted this discussion would help ensure thot the Eost Africon Common Morket Protocol is effectively implemented for the benefit of Ugondo ond other Portner Stofes. The Purpose of this letter therefore, is to forword to you o Report on the Stotus of the obove issue for further guidonce during our interoction with the committee ond to re-offirm our ottendonce os per the stipuloted dote ond time Mogondo Julius Wondero MINISTER OF STATE FOR EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY AFFAIRS C.C. The Speoker, Porlioment of Ugondo, Kompolo The Clerk to Porlioment, Porlioment of Ugondo, Kompolo Permonent Secretory, Ministry of Eost Africon Community Affoirs MINISTRY OF EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY AFFAIRS REPORT ON THE CLOSURE OF UGANDA.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Uganda's Social Impact Investment Landscape
    MAPPING UGANDA’S SOCIAL IMPACT INVESTMENT LANDSCAPE Joseph Kibombo Balikuddembe | Josephine Kaleebi This research is produced as part of the Platform for Uganda Green Growth (PLUG) research series KONRAD ADENAUER STIFTUNG UGANDA ACTADE Plot. 51A Prince Charles Drive, Kololo Plot 2, Agape Close | Ntinda, P.O. Box 647, Kampala/Uganda Kigoowa on Kiwatule Road T: +256-393-262011/2 P.O.BOX, 16452, Kampala Uganda www.kas.de/Uganda T: +256 414 664 616 www. actade.org Mapping SII in Uganda – Study Report November 2019 i DISCLAIMER Copyright ©KAS2020. Process maps, project plans, investigation results, opinions and supporting documentation to this document contain proprietary confidential information some or all of which may be legally privileged and/or subject to the provisions of privacy legislation. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use, disclose, copy, print or disseminate the information contained within this document. Any views expressed are those of the authors. The electronic version of this document has been scanned for viruses and all reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure that no viruses are present. The authors do not accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this document. Please notify the authors immediately by email if this document has been wrongly addressed or delivered. In giving these opinions, the authors do not accept or assume responsibility for any other purpose or to any other person to whom this report is shown or into whose hands it may come save where expressly agreed by the prior written consent of the author This document has been prepared solely for the KAS and ACTADE.
    [Show full text]
  • Vote:213 Mission in Rwanda
    Vote Performance Report Financial Year 2018/19 Vote:213 Mission in Rwanda QUARTER 1: Highlights of Vote Performance V1: Summary of Issues in Budget Execution Table V1.1: Overview of Vote Expenditures (UShs Billion) Approved Cashlimits Released Spent by % Budget % Budget % Releases Budget by End Q1 by End Q 1 End Q1 Released Spent Spent Recurrent Wage 0.529 0.132 0.132 0.117 25.0% 22.2% 88.9% Non Wage 2.408 1.581 1.581 1.012 65.7% 42.0% 64.0% Devt. GoU 0.020 0.010 0.010 0.003 50.0% 15.0% 29.4% Ext. Fin. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% GoU Total 2.957 1.723 1.723 1.132 58.3% 38.3% 65.7% Total GoU+Ext Fin 2.957 1.723 1.723 1.132 58.3% 38.3% 65.7% (MTEF) Arrears 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Total Budget 2.957 1.723 1.723 1.132 58.3% 38.3% 65.7% A.I.A Total 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Grand Total 2.957 1.723 1.723 1.132 58.3% 38.3% 65.7% Total Vote Budget 2.957 1.723 1.723 1.132 58.3% 38.3% 65.7% Excluding Arrears Table V1.2: Releases and Expenditure by Program* Billion Uganda Shillings Approved Released Spent % Budget % Budget %Releases Budget Released Spent Spent Program: 1652 Overseas Mission Services 2.96 1.72 1.13 58.3% 38.3% 65.7% Total for Vote 2.96 1.72 1.13 58.3% 38.3% 65.7% Matters to note in budget execution Variances were due to the fact that this finacial year funds released were for six months thus leading to unspent balances that will be utilised in the subquent Quater.
    [Show full text]
  • Ntungamo District HRV Profile.Pdf
    Ntungamo District Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Profi le 2016 NTUNGAMO DISTRICT HAZARD, RISK AND VULNERABILITY PROFILE a ACKNOWLEDGEMENT On behalf of Office of the Prime Minister, I wish to express my sincere appreciation to all of the key stakeholders who provided their valuable inputs and support to this Multi-Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability mapping exercise that led to the production of comprehensive district Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability (HRV) profiles. I extend my sincere thanks to the Department of Relief, Disaster Preparedness and Management, under the leadership of the Commissioner, Mr. Martin Owor, for the oversight and management of the entire exercise. The HRV assessment team was led by Ms. Ahimbisibwe Catherine, Senior Disaster Preparedness Officer supported by Odong Martin, Disaster Management Officer and the team of consultants (GIS/ DRR specialists); Dr. Bernard Barasa, and Mr. Nsiimire Peter, who provided technical support. Our gratitude goes to UNDP for providing funds to support the Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Mapping. The team comprised of Mr. Steven Goldfinch – Disaster Risk Management Advisor, Mr. Gilbert Anguyo - Disaster Risk Reduction Analyst, and Mr. Ongom Alfred-Early Warning system Programmer. My appreciation also goes to Ntungamo District Team. The entire body of stakeholders who in one way or another yielded valuable ideas and time to support the completion of this exercise. Hon. Hilary O. Onek Minister for Relief, Disaster Preparedness and Refugees NTUNGAMO DISTRICT HAZARD, RISK AND VULNERABILITY PROFILE i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The multi-hazard vulnerability profile outputs from this assessment was a combination of spatial modeling using socio-ecological spatial layers (i.e. DEM, Slope, Aspect, Flow Accumulation, Land use, vegetation cover, hydrology, soil types and soil moisture content, population, socio-economic, health facilities, accessibility, and meteorological data) and information captured from District Key Informant interviews and sub-county FGDs using a participatory approach.
    [Show full text]