DOCSLIB.ORG

Public-Private Partnership for Protected Areas: Current Situation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

let’s talk about it ! AFRICA IS CHANGING: SHOULD ITS PROTECTED AREAS EVOLVE? PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP FOR PROTECTED AREAS: CURRENT SITUATION AND PROSPECTS IN FRENCH-SPEAKING AFRICA Author: David Brugière AUTHOR: DAVID BRUGIÈRE THIS PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE POSSIBLE BY FUNDING FROM THE FRANCE-IUCN PARTNERSHIP. David Brugière holds a 3rd cycle diploma in France has entered into a partnership with the International land management and Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the oldest and a PhD thesis on the largest global organisation for nature conservation. Through evaluation of the impact this partnership. France and IUCN intend to respond to the of logging on large global biodiversity crisis and act together for nature and and medium mammal development. communities in the forests of Gabon. He was an expatriate from 1993 to 2004 in French- speaking Africa, first as a research engineer on action-research programmes related to the management of biodiversity in protected areas of Central Africa (Gabon, Congo, CAR). He then served as a technical assistant on PA management support projects. In this capacity, he was technical advisor for the management of the Upper Niger National Park in Guinea and then project manager for the establishment of a transboundary protected area between Guinea and Guinea Bissau (AGIR programme, EU funding). DISCLAIMER At the end of 2004, David Brugière joined BRL Ingenierie in The designation of geographical entities in this publication France as director of biodiversity projects. He acts on behalf and the presentation of the material do not imply the of bilateral and multilateral development agencies in the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN identification, feasibility and evaluation of projects to support concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, the management of PAs and the conservation of biodiversity or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its in tropical areas. He also conducts technical expertise in frontiers or boundaries. these areas (preparation of PA management and business The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily plans, ecological monitoring programmes, PA strategies, reflect those of IUCN, WCPA and the donors who funded its etc.). He also oversees the implementation of technical preparation. assistance in African PAs and provides technical support to teams deployed in the field. This study is not endorsed by IUCN. For several years, David Brugière has developed expertise in the implementation and evaluation of public-private partnerships (PPPs) for protected areas. After supporting WWF in setting up the PPP for the Salonga National Park, he led in 2016 the evaluation of the partnership agreement established between the Congolese government and the APN for the management of the Odzala-Kokoua National Park. He has also developed projects to support PPP buildout in Cameroon, Zimbabwe and Laos. THE PROGRAMME ON AFRICAN PROTECTED AREAS & CONSERVATION (PAPACO) PAPACO aims at improving the management and governance of protected areas in Africa and their positive results on biodiversity conservation. They focus on 3 complementary domains which are: equitable governance, efficient management and long-term sustainability of PAs. PAPACO works with the World Commission for protected Areas (WCPA). Brugière D., 2020. Public-Private Partnership for protected areas: current situation and prospects in French-speaking Africa. Papaco, 31 pages. Translated from French by INTUITIV. Africa is changing: should its protected areas evolve? FOREWORD their implementation? Why do other PA managers see them as a threat? What are the requirements This report is part of a series of studies commissioned for their creation? How to improve their outcomes? by IUCN-Papaco. The intention of these studies is to What rules should frame them? How to avoid the contribute to the debate around topical issues related misappropriation of their goals? How to achieve the to conservation in Africa, especially the continent’s perfect PPP over the next 30 years? protected areas. These questions are vital, and this report probably Context: in 2050, the population of Africa will isn’t enough to cover the full complexity of answers. have reached 2 billion inhabitants. The needs of But it will certainly contribute to their phrasing. the population keep increasing, fragmentation is accelerating, “natural” land is becoming scarcer. In Have a good read this context, pressures on protected areas increase rapidly and their ability to conserve biodiversity in the long run are more and more limited. Dr Geoffroy Mauvais PAPACO Coordinator What can we do to address these threats? Our approach is simple: we ask an expert on the matter to lay out an analysis to provide a basis for discussion. This report can then be used for this purpose, shared, commented on, criticised, expanded. The goal is that all those involved in the conservation of these territories raise questions, exchange and finally, we hope, envisage a positive future for nature conservation on the continent. This report is called: Public-Private Partnership for protected areas: current situation and prospects in French-speaking Africa. The intention is to answer the following questions: how to optimise the contribution from the private sector to protected area conservation? What is the state of PPPs today? What do they contribute to, officially and expectedly? What are the conditions to II Public-Private Partnership for protected areas: current situation and prospects in French-speaking Africa SUMMARY half of the CAgmts examined (6/12), that positions that are part of a sovereign activity (environmental Over the past twenty years, a new model of protected police) be assigned by right to a civil servant; area management has gradually emerged in French- speaking Africa, the Public-Private Partnerships • in the context of securing funding, the private (PPPs). Three elements constitute this model: (i) a partner is encouraged to develop commercial contractual agreement (CAgmt) signed between activities and seek funding. Failure at this level the State and a non-State (“private”) partner; (ii) a can lead to the termination of the agreement (8 delegation from the State to the private partner of out of 12 CAgmts). The public partner can finance all or part of its prerogatives; (iii) the private partner part of the PA’s expenses through grants to the provides or manages all the necessary funding for the private partner. The latter may have to pay a management of the PA. general fee to the public partner (two parks in the DRC) and pays taxes relating to its tourism activity. As of September 2020, a total of 15 PPPs, involving twenty PAs were active in French-speaking Africa. The analysis of the implementation of PPPs in the The analysis of 12 of the 15 contractual agreements relevant PAs shows that the strengths of this model in (CAgmt) in force shows that the main provisions terms of PA management are: mentioned are: • the establishment of formal governance and • the establishment of a governance entity in consultation structures in which stakeholders, which both the public and private partners are including local communities, are represented represented. Of the 12 CAgmts examined, the (these consultative structures in some cases pre- composition of the governance body is unilateral in exist in the PPP); one case (only the private partner), bilateral (State • the diversification of funding sources, including and private partner) in six cases, and multilateral non-institutional donors, allows, on the one hand, 1 in four cases . The chairmanship of this entity to avoid funding disruptions linked to a single rests with the public partner in eight CAgmts and donor, and on the other hand, to have more with the private partner in three. The majority of flexibility in terms of financial commitments; the members (including the chair) belong to the private partners in nine CAgmts and in two cases • a clarification of decision-making and there is equal representation. Representatives of management lines in day-to-day management local communities are present in four governance allows an efficient operationalisation and the bodies; effective and rapid implementation of field activities; • the delegation of PA operational management to • the deployment in the field of proven anti- a management entity that is always headed by poaching techniques and methods to cope a representative of the private partner, the latter with an increased militarisation of poaching has, being very generally assisted by a representative however, variable results depending on the sites in of the public partner; terms of increase in numbers of large fauna; • the establishment of an advisory body whose size • increased professionalisation of tourism and composition vary widely. This entity provides management allowing an increase in attendance a platform for dialogue with stakeholders. It may and targeting of the high-end segment. be pre-existing to the establishment of the PPP; One of the main limitations of PPPs is their low • the staff of the park is composed by civil servants cultural and political acceptance. In the French- and private partner contractors. All staff, speaking countries of Africa, the political culture of regardless of their status, are placed under the “Central Governance ” still remains very strong and hierarchical authority of the director of the PA, the expression “management delegation” is generally the representative of the private partner. Staff perceived in the public sphere as a form of attack movements may be subject to the formal opinion on national sovereignty. Even in countries that have or agreement of the public partner. This requires, in developed several PPPs, political acceptance of this model remains very fragile and is regularly challenged, 1 Total less than 12 as there is no governance body for the PPP of the Upemba-Kundelungu Complex III Africa is changing: should its protected areas evolve? either because of political culture or because this model deprives the State of the direct management of Official Development Assistance funds.
Recommended publications
  • Chinko/Mbari Drainage Basin Represents a Conservation Hotspot for Eastern Derby Eland in Central Africa

    Chinko/Mbari Drainage Basin Represents a Conservation Hotspot for Eastern Derby Eland in Central Africa

    Published in "African Journal of Ecology 56 (2): 194–201, 2018" which should be cited to refer to this work. Chinko/Mbari drainage basin represents a conservation hotspot for Eastern Derby eland in Central Africa Karolına Brandlova1 | Marketa Glonekova1 | Pavla Hejcmanova1 | Pavla Jůnkova Vymyslicka1 | Thierry Aebischer2 | Raffael Hickisch3 | David Mallon4 1Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Praha 6, Abstract Czech Republic One of the largest of antelopes, Derby eland (Taurotragus derbianus), is an important 2Department of Biology, University of ecosystem component of African savannah. While the western subspecies is Critically Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland 3Chinko Project, Operations, Chinko, Endangered, the eastern subspecies is classified as least concern. Our study presents the Bangui, Central African Republic first investigation of population dynamics of the Derby eland in the Chinko/Mbari Drai- 4 Co-Chair, IUCN/SSC Antelope Specialist nage Basin, Central African Republic, and assesses the conservation role of this popula- Group and Division of Biology and Conservation Ecology, Manchester tion. We analysed data from 63 camera traps installed in 2012. The number of individuals Metropolitan University, Glossop, UK captured within a single camera event ranged from one to 41. Herds were mostly mixed Correspondence by age and sex, mean group size was 5.61, larger during the dry season. Adult (AD) males ı Karol na Brandlova constituted only 20% of solitary individuals. The overall sex ratio (M:F) was 1:1.33, while Email: [email protected] the AD sex ratio shifted to 1:1.52, reflecting selective hunting pressure. Mean density Funding information ranged from 0.04 to 0.16 individuals/km2, giving an estimated population size of 445– Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Grant/Award Number: 20135010, 1,760 individuals.
  • Benin 2019 - 2020

    Benin 2019 - 2020

    BENIN 2019 - 2020 West African Savannah Buffalo Western Roan Antelope For more than twenty years, we have been organizing big game safaris in the north of the country on the edge of the Pendjari National Park, in the Porga hunting zone. The hunt is physically demanding and requires hunters to be in good physical condition. It is primary focused on hunting Roan Antelopes, West Savannah African Buffaloes, Western Kobs, Nagor Reedbucks, Western Hartebeests… We shoot one good Lion every year, hunted only by tracking. Baiting is not permitted. Accommodation is provided in a very confortable tented camp offering a spectacular view on the bush.. Hunting season: from the beginning of January to mid-May. - 6 days safari: each hunter can harvest 1 West African Savannah Buffalo, 1 Roan Antelope or 1 Western Hartebeest, 1 Nagor Reedbuck or 1 Western Kob, 1 Western Bush Duiker, 1 Red Flanked Duiker, 1 Oribi, 1 Harnessed Bushbuck, 1 Warthog and 1 Baboon. - 13 and 20 days safari: each hunter can harvest 1 Lion (if available at the quota), 1 West African Savannah Buffalo, 1 Roan Antelope, 1 Sing Sing Waterbuck, 1 Hippopotamus, 1 Western Hartebeest, 1 Nagor Reedbuck, 1 Western Kob, 1 Western Bush Duiker, 1 Red Flanked Duiker, 1 Oribi, 1 Harnessed Bushbuck, 1 Warthog and 1 Baboon. Prices in USD: Price of the safari per person 6 hunting days 13 hunting days 20 hunting days 2 Hunters x 1 Guide 8,000 16,000 25,000 1 Hunter x 1 Guide 11,000 24,000 36,000 Observer 3,000 4,000 5,000 The price of the safari includes: - Meet and greet plus assistance at Cotonou airport (Benin), - Transfer from Cotonou to the hunting area and back by car, - The organizing of your safari with 4x4 vehicles, professional hunters, trackers, porters, skinners, - Full board accommodation and drinks at the hunting camp.
  • Collaborative Management Models in Africa

    Collaborative Management Models in Africa

    Collaborative Management Models in Africa Peter Lindsey Mujon Baghai Introduction to the context behind the development of and rationale for CMPs in Africa Africa’s PAs represent potentially priceless assets due to the environmental services they provide and for their potential economic value via tourism However, the resources allocated for management of PAs are far below what is needed in most countries to unlock their potential A study in progress indicates that of 22 countries assessed, half have average PA management budgets of <10% of what is needed for effective management (Lindsey et al. in prep) This means that many countries will lose their wildlife assets before ever really being able to benefit from them So why is there such under-investment? Two big reasons - a) competing needs and overall budget shortages; b) a high burden of PAs relative to wealth However, in some cases underinvestment may be due to: ● Misconceptions that PAs can pay for themselves on a park level ● Lack of appreciation among policy makers that PAs need investment to yield economic dividends This mistake has grave consequences… This means that in most countries, PA networks are not close to delivering their potential: • Economic value • Social value • Ecological value Africa’s PAs are under growing pressure from an array of threats Ed Sayer ProtectedInsights areas fromare becoming recent rapidly research depleted in many areas There is a case for elevated support for Africa’s PA network from African governments But also a case for greater investment from
  • African Parks 2 African Parks

    African Parks 2 African Parks

    African Parks 2 African Parks African Parks is a non-profit conservation organisation that takes on the total responsibility for the rehabilitation and long-term management of national parks in partnership with governments and local communities. By adopting a business approach to conservation, supported by donor funding, we aim to rehabilitate each park making them ecologically, socially and financially sustainable in the long-term. Founded in 2000, African Parks currently has 15 parks under management in nine countries – Benin, Central African Republic, Chad, the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Republic of Congo, Malawi, Mozambique, Rwanda and Zambia. More than 10.5 million hectares are under our protection. We also maintain a strong focus on economic development and poverty alleviation in neighbouring communities, ensuring that they benefit from the park’s existence. Our goal is to manage 20 parks by 2020, and because of the geographic spread and representation of different ecosystems, this will be the largest and the most ecologically diverse portfolio of parks under management by any one organisation across Africa. Black lechwe in Bangweulu Wetlands in Zambia © Lorenz Fischer The Challenge The world’s wild and functioning ecosystems are fundamental to the survival of both people and wildlife. We are in the midst of a global conservation crisis resulting in the catastrophic loss of wildlife and wild places. Protected areas are facing a critical period where the number of well-managed parks is fast declining, and many are simply ‘paper parks’ – they exist on maps but in reality have disappeared. The driving forces of this conservation crisis is the human demand for: 1.
  • Transhumant Pastoralism in Africa's Sudano-Sahel

    Transhumant Pastoralism in Africa's Sudano-Sahel

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Transhumant Pastoralism in Africa’s Sudano-Sahel The interface of conservation, security, and development Mbororo pastoralists illegally grazing cattle in Garamba National Park, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Credit: Naftali Honig/African Parks Africa’s Sudano-Sahel is a distinct bioclimatic and ecological zone made up of savanna and savanna-forest transition Program Priorities habitat that covers approximately 7.7 million square kilometers of the continent. Rich in species diversity, the • Increased data gathering and assessment of core Sudano-Sahel region represents one of the last remaining natural resource assets across the Sudano-Sahel region. intact wilderness areas in the world, and is a high priority • Efficient data-sharing, analysis, and dissemination for wildlife conservation. It is home to an array of antelope between relevant stakeholders spanning conservation, species such as giant eland and greater kudu, in addition to security, and development sectors, and in collaboration African wild dog, Kordofan giraffe, African elephant, African with rural agriculturalists and pastoralists. lion, leopard, and giant pangolin. • Enhancement and promotion of multi-level This region is also home to many rural communities who rely governance approaches to resolve conflict and stabilize on the landscape’s natural resources, including pastoralists, transhumance corridors. whose livelihoods and cultural identity are centered around • Continuation and expansion of strategic investments in strategic mobility to access seasonally available grazing the network of priority protected areas and their buffer resources and water. Instability, climate change, and zones across the Sudano-Sahel, in order to improve increasing pressures from unsustainable land use activities security for both wildlife and surrounding communities.
  • WAR and PROTECTED AREAS AREAS and PROTECTED WAR Vol 14 No 1 Vol 14 Protected Areas Programme Areas Protected

    WAR and PROTECTED AREAS AREAS and PROTECTED WAR Vol 14 No 1 Vol 14 Protected Areas Programme Areas Protected

    Protected Areas Programme Protected Areas Programme Vol 14 No 1 WAR AND PROTECTED AREAS 2004 Vol 14 No 1 WAR AND PROTECTED AREAS 2004 Parks Protected Areas Programme © 2004 IUCN, Gland, Switzerland Vol 14 No 1 WAR AND PROTECTED AREAS 2004 ISSN: 0960-233X Vol 14 No 1 WAR AND PROTECTED AREAS CONTENTS Editorial JEFFREY A. MCNEELY 1 Parks in the crossfire: strategies for effective conservation in areas of armed conflict JUDY OGLETHORPE, JAMES SHAMBAUGH AND REBECCA KORMOS 2 Supporting protected areas in a time of political turmoil: the case of World Heritage 2004 Sites in the Democratic Republic of Congo GUY DEBONNET AND KES HILLMAN-SMITH 9 Status of the Comoé National Park, Côte d’Ivoire and the effects of war FRAUKE FISCHER 17 Recovering from conflict: the case of Dinder and other national parks in Sudan WOUTER VAN HOVEN AND MUTASIM BASHIR NIMIR 26 Threats to Nepal’s protected areas PRALAD YONZON 35 Tayrona National Park, Colombia: international support for conflict resolution through tourism JENS BRÜGGEMANN AND EDGAR EMILIO RODRÍGUEZ 40 Establishing a transboundary peace park in the demilitarized zone on the Kuwaiti/Iraqi borders FOZIA ALSDIRAWI AND MUNA FARAJ 48 Résumés/Resumenes 56 Subscription/advertising details inside back cover Protected Areas Programme Vol 14 No 1 WAR AND PROTECTED AREAS 2004 ■ Each issue of Parks addresses a particular theme, in 2004 these are: Vol 14 No 1: War and protected areas Vol 14 No 2: Durban World Parks Congress Vol 14 No 3: Global change and protected areas ■ Parks is the leading global forum for information on issues relating to protected area establishment and management ■ Parks puts protected areas at the forefront of contemporary environmental issues, such as biodiversity conservation and ecologically The international journal for protected area managers sustainable development ISSN: 0960-233X Published three times a year by the World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) of IUCN – Subscribing to Parks The World Conservation Union.
  • Private Governance of Protected Areas in Africa: Case Studies, Lessons Learnt and Conditions of Success

    Private Governance of Protected Areas in Africa: Case Studies, Lessons Learnt and Conditions of Success

    Program on African Protected Areas & Conservation (PAPACO) PAPACO study 19 Private governance of protected areas in Africa: case studies, lessons learnt and conditions of success @B. Chataigner Sue Stolton and Nigel Dudley Equilibrium Research & IIED Equilibrium Research offers practical solutions to conservation challenges, from concept, to implementation, to evaluation of impact. With partners ranging from local communities to UN agencies across the world, we explore and develop approaches to natural resource management that balance the needs of nature and people. We see biodiversity conservation as an ethical necessity, which can also support human wellbeing. We run our own portfolio of projects and offer personalised consultancy. Prepared for: IIED under contract to IUCN EARO Reproduction: This publication may be reproduced for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission, provided acknowledgement to the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose without permission in writing from Equilibrium Research. Citation: Stolton, S and N Dudley (2015). Private governance of protected areas in Africa: Cases studies, lessons learnt and conditions of success. Bristol, UK, Equilibrium Research and London, UK, IIED Cover: Private conservancies in Namibia and Kenya © Equilibrium Research Contact: Equilibrium Research, 47 The Quays Cumberland Road, Spike Island Bristol, BS1 6UQ, UK Telephone: +44 [0]117-925-5393 www.equilibriumconsultants.com Page | 2 Contents 1. Executive summary
  • Panthera Pardus) Range Countries

    Panthera Pardus) Range Countries

    Profiles for Leopard (Panthera pardus) Range Countries Supplemental Document 1 to Jacobson et al. 2016 Profiles for Leopard Range Countries TABLE OF CONTENTS African Leopard (Panthera pardus pardus)...................................................... 4 North Africa .................................................................................................. 5 West Africa ................................................................................................... 6 Central Africa ............................................................................................. 15 East Africa .................................................................................................. 20 Southern Africa ........................................................................................... 26 Arabian Leopard (P. p. nimr) ......................................................................... 36 Persian Leopard (P. p. saxicolor) ................................................................... 42 Indian Leopard (P. p. fusca) ........................................................................... 53 Sri Lankan Leopard (P. p. kotiya) ................................................................... 58 Indochinese Leopard (P. p. delacouri) .......................................................... 60 North Chinese Leopard (P. p. japonensis) ..................................................... 65 Amur Leopard (P. p. orientalis) ..................................................................... 67 Javan Leopard
  • Kordofan Giraffe (Giraffa Camelopardalis Antiquorum), Garamba National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo

    Kordofan Giraffe (Giraffa Camelopardalis Antiquorum), Garamba National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo

    Quarterly conservation update – Kordofan giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis antiquorum), Garamba National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo October-December 2016 Mathias D’haen Czech University of Life Sciences (CULS), Kamýcká 961/129, 165 21 Prague 6-Suchdol, Czech Republic Introduction Garamba National Park (GNP) in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) was first established in 1938 by virtue of its uniqueness, one of the first Parks in Africa. Throughout its long history the Park was initially made famous with the world’s only elephant domestication program, coupled with its high numbers of elephant and buffalo, and home to the world’s last northern white rhino (Ceratotherium simum cottoni) population. The Park was designated a UNESCO World Heritage site in 1980 and on the List of World Heritage in Danger in 1996. Sadly, the Park’s infamy has increased through losing the last northern white rhino, and being plagued by numerous groups of rebels, in particular the Lord’s Resistance Army. In fact, the Park, being nestled in the far north-eastern corner of the country, is writing history every day again, not because of the countries’ own destabilised politics (the 2000km between the Park and the countries’ capital creates an efficient buffer), but because of its war against armed militia coming from within and neighbouring countries. GNP, and its adjacent Hunting Reserves, are also home to DRC’s only population of giraffe, historically named ‘Congo giraffe’ (Amube et al. 2009; De Merode et al. 2000; East 1999) but reclassified as they are genetically identical to other Kordofan giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis antiquorum) across Central Africa (Fennessy et al.
  • Deadly Profits: Illegal Wildlife Trafficking Through Uganda And

    Deadly Profits: Illegal Wildlife Trafficking Through Uganda And

    Cover: The carcass of an elephant killed by militarized poachers. Garamba National Park, DRC, April 2016. Photo: African Parks Deadly Profits Illegal Wildlife Trafficking through Uganda and South Sudan By Ledio Cakaj and Sasha Lezhnev July 2017 Executive Summary Countries that act as transit hubs for international wildlife trafficking are a critical, highly profitable part of the illegal wildlife smuggling supply chain, but are frequently overlooked. While considerable attention is paid to stopping illegal poaching at the chain’s origins in national parks and changing end-user demand (e.g., in China), countries that act as midpoints in the supply chain are critical to stopping global wildlife trafficking. They are needed way stations for traffickers who generate considerable profits, thereby driving the market for poaching. This is starting to change, as U.S., European, and some African policymakers increasingly recognize the problem, but more is needed to combat these key trafficking hubs. In East and Central Africa, South Sudan and Uganda act as critical waypoints for elephant tusks, pangolin scales, hippo teeth, and other wildlife, as field research done for this report reveals. Kenya and Tanzania are also key hubs but have received more attention. The wildlife going through Uganda and South Sudan is largely illegally poached at alarming rates from Garamba National Park in the Democratic Republic of Congo, South Sudan, points in West Africa, and to a lesser extent Uganda, as it makes its way mainly to East Asia. Worryingly, the elephant
  • Garamba National Park, DRC – Field Report

    Garamba National Park, DRC – Field Report

    Garamba National Park, DRC – Field Report February 2015 Julian Fennessy & Francois Deacon Garamba National Park (NP) in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) historically conjured up images of early explorers crossing large open plains, on the edge of the forest, teaming with elephant, buffalo, rhino, giraffe and predators. Nestled into the north east of the country bordering (South) Sudan, Garamba NP is a World Heritage Site which was once home to the last remaining population of Northern White Rhino and the previously assumed Congo giraffe. However, these were not exactly the images that first came to my mind when GCF was approached by African Parks Network (APN) together with the Congolese Institute for Nature Conservation (ICCN) to support an initiative to save the last giraffe in the DRC. I conjured images of the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA), Joseph Kony and child soldiers plundering communities and parks – images that have been splashed across the media for more than a decade. These images, understandably, had me thinking twice. But, we are all about giraffe conservation and if any giraffe population needs help, this definitely was one to look out for. With valuable financial support from the Mohammed bin Zayed Foundation Species Conservation Fund, it was only a matter of convincing (Dr to be) Francois Deacon from the University of Free Sate, South Africa to join me and help assess the situation for DRC’s last giraffe population. Once we had met up in Entebbe, Uganda in mid-February we chatted late into the night about the days ahead focussing on all things giraffe – and trying to have some perspective that this was not going to be Southern Africa, our home turf.
  • Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa and Its Islands Conservation, Management and Sustainable Use

    Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa and Its Islands Conservation, Management and Sustainable Use

    Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa and its Islands Conservation, Management and Sustainable Use Occasional Papers of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 6 IUCN - The World Conservation Union IUCN Species Survival Commission Role of the SSC The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is IUCN's primary source of the 4. To provide advice, information, and expertise to the Secretariat of the scientific and technical information required for the maintenance of biologi- Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna cal diversity through the conservation of endangered and vulnerable species and Flora (CITES) and other international agreements affecting conser- of fauna and flora, whilst recommending and promoting measures for their vation of species or biological diversity. conservation, and for the management of other species of conservation con- cern. Its objective is to mobilize action to prevent the extinction of species, 5. To carry out specific tasks on behalf of the Union, including: sub-species and discrete populations of fauna and flora, thereby not only maintaining biological diversity but improving the status of endangered and • coordination of a programme of activities for the conservation of bio- vulnerable species. logical diversity within the framework of the IUCN Conservation Programme. Objectives of the SSC • promotion of the maintenance of biological diversity by monitoring 1. To participate in the further development, promotion and implementation the status of species and populations of conservation concern. of the World Conservation Strategy; to advise on the development of IUCN's Conservation Programme; to support the implementation of the • development and review of conservation action plans and priorities Programme' and to assist in the development, screening, and monitoring for species and their populations.