DOCSLIB.ORG

Recent Bryological Literature of Cis and Baltic Countries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Recent Bryological Literature of Cis and Baltic Countries Arctoa (2001) 10: 243-258 RECENT BRYOLOGICAL LITERATURE OF CIS AND BALTIC COUNTRIES. IV. ÍÎÂÀß ÁÐÈÎËÎÃÈ×ÅÑÊÀß ËÈÒÅÐÀÒÓÐÀ ÏÎ ÑÍÃ È ÑÒÐÀÍÀÌ ÁÀËÒÈÈ. IV. IRINA V. CZERNYADJEVA1 AND MICHAEL S. IGNATOV2 ÈÐÈÍÀ Â. ×ÅÐÍßÄÜÅÂÀ1 È ÌÈÕÀÈË Ñ. ÈÃÍÀÒÎÂ2 We continue to publish recent bibliography Ìû ïðîäîëæàåì ïóáëèêàöèþ áèáëèîãðàôèè of bryological literature, which either were íîâûõ áðèîëîãè÷åñêèõ ðàáîò, êîòîðûå ëèáî published by authors of CIS and Baltic áûëè îïóáëèêîâàíû àâòîðàìè èç ñòðàí ÑÍà countries, or deal with floristic and taxonomic è Áàëòèè, ëèáî ïîñâÿùåíû ôëîðèñòè÷åñêèì è investigations in this territory. Previous issues òàêñîíîìè÷åñêèì èññëåäîâàíèÿì íà òåððèòîðèè were titled “Recent bryological literature of ýòèõ ãîñóäàðñòâ. Ïðåäûäóùèå âûïóñêè íàçû- the former USSR”. In the present paper there âàëèñü “Íîâàÿ áðèîëîãè÷åñêàÿ ëèòåðàòóðà ïî cited publications which appeared mostly in áûâøåìó ÑÑÑД.  äàííûé âûïóñê âêëþ÷åíû 1999-2000. Brief abstracts from conferences ðàáîòû, âûøåäøèå â îñíîâíîì â 1999-2000 ãã. are not included. (êðàòêèå òåçèñû êîíôåðåíöèé íå ïðèâîäÿòñÿ). [AFONINA, O.M.] ÀÔÎÍÈÍÀ, Î.Ì. 2000. Ñòàíîâëå- Âûï. 88. Ìîõîîáðàçíûå è ëèøàéíèêè çàïîâåäíèêà «Îñ- íèå è ðàçâèòèå áðèîëîãèè â Áîòàíè÷åñêîì èíñòèòó- òðîâ Âðàíãåëÿ». Ìîñêâà [Flora i fauna zapovednikov. òå èì. Â.Ë. Êîìàðîâà ÐÀÍ. – [Development of bryology 88. Mochoobraznye i lishajniki zapovednika “Ostrov of the Komarov Botanical Institute RAS]  êí.: Ìè- Vrangelya”. Moscow]: 6-46. / Annotated list of 237 êîëîãèÿ è êðèïòîãàìíàÿ áîòàíèêà â Ðîññèè: òðà- species (Vrangel Island, Russian Arctic). äèöèè è ñîâðåìåííîñòü. Òð. ìåæäóíàð. êîíô., ïî- [AFONINA, O.M.] ÀÔÎÍÈÍÀ, Î.Ì. 2000. Àðêòè÷åñêèé ýëå- ñâÿùåííîé 100-ëåòèþ îðãàíèçàöèè èññëåäîâàíèé ïî ìåíò âî ôëîðå ìõîâ ×óêîòêè. – [The arctic element in moss ìèêîëîãèè è êðèïòîãàìíîé áîòàíèêå â Áîòàíè÷åñ- flora of Chukotka]  êí.: Ìèêîëîãèÿ... {ñì. 1 ðàáîòó/ see êîì èí-òå èì. Â. Ë. Êîìàðîâà ÐÀÍ (Ñàíêò-Ïå- 1st reference}: 490-492. /The arctic element on Chukotka òåðáóðã, 24-28 àïðåëÿ, 2000 ã.) ÑÏá, ÁÈÍ ÐÀÍ [In: includes 56 taxa of mosses. The list of species is given. Mikologia i kriptogamnaya botanika v Rossii: traditzii [AFONINA, O.M.] ÀÔÎÍÈÍÀ, Î.Ì. 2000. Áðèîôëîðà i sovremennost’ (Proc. conf., St-Peterbsurg, 24-28 April, ×óêîòêè. – [Bryoflora of Chukotka] 2000), St.-Petersburg, Komarov' Bot. Inst.]: 39-46. Àâòîðåôåðàò…- äîêò. áèîë. íàóê, Ñàíêò-Ïåòåðáóðã, ÁÈÍ [Doctorial AFONINA, O.M. & H. ANDO 1998. Hypnum holmenii Thesis, Sankt-Petersburg, Komarov' Bot. Inst.]: 46 . (Hypnaceae) in Russia. –  êí.: Ïðîáëåìû áîòàíè- [AFONINA, O.M. & H. ANDO] ÀÔÎÍÈÍÀ, Î.Ì., Õ. ÀÍÄÎ êè íà ðóáåæå XX-XXI âåêîâ. Òåç. äîê., ïðåäñòàâ- 2000. Hypnum holmenii (Musci, Hypnaceae) â áðèîôëîðå ëåííûõ II(X) ñúåçäó Ðóññêîãî áîòàíè÷åñêîãî îá- Ðîññèè. – [Hypnum holmenii (Musci, Hypnaceae) in moss ùåñòâà (26-29 ìàÿ 1998, Ñàíêò-Ïåòåðáóðã). Ò. 2. flora of Russia] [ ] (3): / ÑÏá, ÁÈÍ ÐÀÍ [In: Problemó botaniki na rubezhe Áîò. Æóðí. Bot. Zhurn. 85 40-46 Description, illustration, distribution map are provided. XX-XXI vekov. Abstr. II(X) Congr. Russ. Bot. Soc. (26-29 May, 1998, St.-Petersburg). Vol. 2. St.- [AFONINA, O.M. & I.B. KUCHEROV] ÀÔÎÍÈÍÀ, Î.Ì., Petersburg, Komarov' Bot. Inst.]: 126-127. È.Á. ÊÓ×ÅÐΠ1999. Ôëîðà ëèñòîñòåáåëüíûõ ìõîâ âíóò- [AFONINA, O.M.] ÀÔÎÍÈÍÀ, Î.Ì. 1999. Ê ôëîðå ðåííåé ÷àñòè ïåðåøåéêà ×óêîòñêîãî ïîëóîñòðîâà (Ðàé- ëèñòîñòåáåëüíûõ ìõîâ îñòðîâà Áîëüøåâèê (àðõè- îí Àìãóýìñêîãî ìîñòà). – [Moss flora of the inner part of ïåëàã Ñåâåðíàÿ Çåìëÿ). – [On the moss flora of the Chukchi Peninsula Isthmus (the vicinities of the Amguema bridge) [ .] (5): Bol’shevik Island (Severnaya Zenlya)] Íîâîñòè Áîò. Æóðí. Bot. Zhurn 84 77- / The annotated list includes 170 species (Chukchi ñèñò. íèçø. ðàñò. [Novosti Sist. Nizch. Rast.] 33: 95. Peninsula, Russian Far East). 171-179. / The annotated list includes 71 species, 25 new for Bol’shevik Island (Russian Siberian Arctic). AKATOVA, T.V. & E.A. IGNATOVA [ÀÊÀÒÎÂÀ, Ò.Â., [AFONINA, O.M.] ÀÔÎÍÈÍÀ, Î.Ì. 2000. Ìîõîîáðàç- Å. À. ÈÃÍÀÒÎÂÀ] 2000. Pogonatum neesii (Polytrichaceae, Musci) in the Russian Caucasus. – : íûå. – [Bryophytes] Ôëîðà è ôàóíà çàïîâåäíèêîâ. Arctoa 9 127-128. 1 – Komarov' Botanical Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Popova 2, St.-Petersburg 197376 Russia – Ñàíêò- Ïåòåðáóðã 197376 Ïîïîâà 2, Áîòàíè÷åñêèé èíñòèòóò ÐÀÍ 2 – Main Botanical Garden of Russian Academy of Sciences, Botanicheskaya 4, Moscow 127276 Russia – Ðîññèÿ 127276 Ìîñêâà, Áîòàíè÷åñêàÿ 4, Ãëàâíûé áîòàíè÷åñêèé ñàä Ðîññèéñêîé Àêàäåìèè Íàóê 244 IRINA V. CZERNYADJEVA, MICHAEL S. IGNATOV [AKIMOVA, E.V.] ÀÊÈÌÎÂÀ, Å.Â. 1996. Äîïîëíåíèå ê [The evaluation of taxonomic significance of spores of ôëîðå ïå÷åíî÷íûõ ìõîâ ßêóòèè. – [Additions to liverworts]  êí.: Ìèêîëîãèÿ... {ñì. 1 ðàáîòó/ see liverwort flora of Yakutiya (East Siberia)]  êí.: Ôëîðà 1st reference}: 488-490. è ðàñòèòåëüíîñòü Ñèáèðè è Äàëüíåãî Âîñòîêà.×òå- [ANDREEVA, E.N. & G.Yu. KONECHNAYA] ÀÍÄÐÅÅ- íèÿ ïàìÿòè Ë.Ì.×åðåïíèíà. Òåç. äîêë. 2 Ðîññ. êîíô. ÂÀ, Å.Í., Ã.Þ. ÊÎÍÅ×ÍÀß 2000. Ðîëü êàðüåðîâ â Êðàñíîÿðñê, èçä-âî ÊÃÏÓ [In: Flora i•rastitel’nost’ ñîõðàíåíèè ðåäêèõ âèäîâ ðàñòåíèé íà ñåâåðî-çàïàäå Sibiri i Dal’nego Vostoka. Chteniya pamyati L.M. Ðîññèè. – [The role of the pits in conservation of the Cherepnina. Abstr. conf., Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk. Gos. rare species on north-west Russia]  êí.: Ñîöèàëüíûå Pedagog. Univ.]: 47-49. è ýêîëîãè÷åñêèå ïðîáëåìû Áàëòèéñêîãî ðåãèîíà. [AKIMOVA, E.V.] ÀÊÈÌÎÂÀ, Å.Â. 1998. Åñòåñòâåííîå Ìàò. Îáùåñòâåííî-íàó÷. êîíô., Ïñêîâ [In: çàðàñòàíèå ìõàìè òåõíîãåííûõ ëàíäøàôòîâ îêðåñò- Sotsial’nye i ekologicheskie problemy Baltijskogo íîñòåé ïîñ. Êóäóð (Óñòü-ßíñêèé Óëóñ). –  êí.: regiona. Proc. conf., Pskov]: 206-207. / 8 species of Ïðîáëåìû áîòàíèêè íà ðóáåæå XX-XXI âåêîâ. Òåç. rare bryophytes from Leningrad Province are cited äîê., ïðåäñòàâëåííûõ II(X) ñúåçäó Ðóññêîãî áîòà- (European Russia). íè÷åñêîãî îáùåñòâà (26-29 ìàÿ 1998, Ñàíêò-Ïåòåð- [BAIK, O.L. & O.T. DEMKIV] ÁÀIÊ, Î.Ë., Î.Ò. ÄÅÌÊIÂ. áóðã). Ò. 2. ÑÏá, ÁÈÍ ÐÀÍ [In: Problemó botaniki 1998. Ìîðôîëîãi÷íà i áiîõiìi÷íà ìiíëèâiñòü Ceratodon na rubezhe XX-XXI vekov. Abstr. II(X) Congr. Russ. purpureus (Hedw.) Brid. – [Morphological and biochemical Bot. Soc. (26-29 May, 1998, St.-Petersburg). Vol. 2. variability of Ceratodon purpureus (Hedw.) Brid.] Óêð. St.-Petersburg, Komarov' Bot. Inst.]: 126. Áîò. Æóðí. [Ukr.Bot. Zhurn.] 55(5): 499-504. [ANDREEVA, E.N.] ÀÍÄÐÅÅÂÀ, Å.Í. 1999. Íàõîäêà ïå- [BAISHEVA, E.Z.] ÁÀÈØÅÂÀ, Ý.Ç. 1999. Ê áðèîôëîðå ÷åíî÷íîãî ìõà Ricciocarpos natans â Ïñêîâñêîì Ïî- ðó÷üåâ è ãîðíûõ ðåê Áàøêèðèè. – [On bryophytes of îçåðüå. – [The record of Ricciocarpos natans in Pskov streams and mountain creeks in Bashkiria] Ôàóíà è Poozer’e] Îçåðà Áåëîðóññêîãî Ïîîçåðüÿ: ñîâðåìåí- ôëîðà Ðåñïóáëèêè Áàøêîðòîñòàí. Óôà [Fauna i flora íîå ñîñòîÿíèå, ïðîáëåìû èñïîëüçîâàíèÿ è îõðàíû. Respubliki Bashkortostan, Ufa]: 111-112. /Data on 59 Ìàò. ìåæä. íàó÷. êîíô., Âèòåáñê [Ozera Belorusskofo mosses and 14 hepatics; many of them from Yuzhno- Poozer’ya: sovremennoe sostoyanie, problemy Uralski Reserve. ispol’zovania i ochrany. Proc. conf., Vitebsk]: 44-45. / The peculiarities of distribution and morphology of [BAISHEVA, E.Z.] ÁÀÈØÅÂÀ, Ý.Ç. 2000. Ê áðèîôëîðå äîëèíû ð. Áåëàÿ ïðîåêòèðóåìîãî Þìàãóçèíñêîãî âîäî- Ricciocarpos natans are discussed (Pskov province, European Russia). õðàíèëèùà (Þæíûé Óðàë). – [To bryoflora of valley of Belaya River (Jumaguzin reservoir, South Ural)]  êí.: [ANDREEVA, E.N.] ÀÍÄÐÅÅÂÀ, Å.Í. 1999. Ïåðâûå íà- Ìèêîëîãèÿ... {ñì. 1 ðàáîòó/ see 1st reference}: 493- õîäêè ðåëèêòîâûõ íåìîðàëüíûõ âèäîâ ìõîâ â Ïñêîâ- 494. /94 mosses and 8 liverworts are found; some species ñêîé è Íîâãîðîäñêîé îáëàñòÿõ. – [The first records of listed. relict nemoral moss species in Pskov and Novgorod BAISHEVA, E.Z. [ÁÀÈØÅÂÀ, Ý.Ç.] 2000. Bryophyte provinces] Ïðîáëåìû ýêîëîãèè è ðåãèîíàëüíîé ïîëè- vegetation of Bashkiria (SouthUrals). III. Epiphytic òèêè Ñåâåðî-Çàïàäà Ðîññèè è ñîïðåäåëüíûõ òåððè- and epixylic communities of Western Bashkiria. – òîðèé. Ìàò. ìåæä. îáù.-íàó÷. êîíô., Ïñêîâ : / 6 associations are discussed. [Problemy ekologii i regional’noj politiki Severo-Zapada Arctoa 9 101-104. Rossii i sopredel’nych territorij. Proc. conf., Pskov]: [BAKALIN, V.A.] ÁÀÊÀËÈÍ, Â.À. 1999. Ïå÷åíî÷íèêè 83-84. / Nowellia curvifolia and Schistostega pennata Êàðåëèè. – [Liverworts of Karelia] Arctoa 8: 17-26. / are reported from Pskov and Novgorod Province The annotated list includes 174 species. (European Russia). [BAKALIN, V.A.] ÁÀÊÀËÈÍ, Â.À. 1999. Ê ôëîðå ïå÷å- [ANDREEVA, E.N.] ÀÍÄÐÅÅÂÀ, Å.Í. 2000. Óíèêàëüíûé íî÷íûõ ìõîâ Êèæñêèõ øõåð. – [On the liverwort flora êîìïëåêñ ìîõîâûõ ñîîáùåñòâ Ñåáåæñêîãî íàöèîíàëü- of Kizhckij shchera] Íîâîñòè ñèñò. íèçø. ðàñò. íîãî ïàðêà. – [The unique complex of moss communities [Novosti Sist. Nizch. Rast.] 33: 180-184. / The of Sebezhskij National Park] Ïðèðîäà Ïñêîâñêîãî êðàÿ, annotated list includes 42 species (Karelia, European ÑÏá [Priroda Pskovskogo Kraya, Sankt-Petersburg], 11: Russia). 3-7. / The characteristic of moss communities is provided BAKALIN, V.A. [ÁÀÊÀËÈÍ, Â.À.] 2000. Additions to the (Pskov Province, European Russia). liverworts flora of the Paanajäärvi National Park and [ANDREEVA, E.N.] ÀÍÄÐÅÅÂÀ, Å.Í. 2000. Íîâûå âèäû its vicinity. – Oulanka Reports 23: 5-10. /The annotated âîäíûõ ëèñòîñòåáåëüíûõ ìõîâ Ëåíèíãðàäñêîé îáëàñ- list includes 78 species (Karelia, European Russia). òè. – [New records of aquatic mosses for Leningrad BAKALIN, V.A. [ÁÀÊÀËÈÍ, Â.À.] 2000. Notes on Lophozia Province]  êí.: Ñîõðàíåíèå áèîëîãè÷åñêîãî ðàçíîîá- I. What is Lophozia silvicola Buch var. grandiretis Buch ðàçèÿ
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Screening Opinion on the Impact of the Oldham MBC Air Quality Supplementary Planning Document on the Rochdale Canal Special A
    Initial Screening Opinion on the Impact of Manchester City Council’s Supplementary Planning Guidance ‘Providing for Housing Choice’ on European Protected Sites December 2007 Initial Screening Opinion on the Impact of Manchester City Council’s Supplementary Planning Document ‘Providing for Housing Choice’ on European Protected Sites Introduction Article 6(3) of the European Habitats Directive dealing with the conservation of European protected sites states that; ‘Any plan or project not directly connected with or necessary to the management of the site but likely to have a significant effect thereon, either individually or in combination with other plans and projects, shall be subject to appropriate assessment of its implications for the site in view of the site’s conservation objectives. In light of the conclusions of the assessment of the implications for the site and subject to the provisions of paragraph 4, the competent national authorities shall agree to the plan or project only after ascertained that it will not adversely affect the integrity of the site concerned and, if appropriate, after having obtained the opinion of the general public.’ The purpose of Appropriate Assessment (AA) of land use plans is to ensure that protection of the integrity of European sites is a part of the planning process at a regional and local level. Appropriate Assessment can be seen as having a number of discrete stages - 1 Stage 1 - Screening 2 Stage 2 – Appropriate Assessment 3 Stage 3 – Assessment of Alternatives 4 Stage 4 – Assessment where no alternatives
    [Show full text]
  • PMSD Wetlands Curriculum
    WWEETTLLAANNDDSS CCUURRRRIICCUULLUUMM POCONO MOUNTAIN SCHOOL DISTRICT ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This curriculum was funded through a grant from Pennsylvania’s Growing Greener Program administered through the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. The grant was awarded to the Tobyhanna Creek/Tunkhannock Creek Watershed Association to support ongoing watershed resource protection. The views herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. Special appreciation is extended to the Pocono Mountain School District, especially Mr. Thomas Knorr, Science Supervisor, and Dr. David Krauser, Superintendent of Schools for their support of and commitment to this project. Project partners responsible for this project include: a Pocono Mountain School District a Tobyhanna Creek/Tunkhannock Creek Watershed Association a Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection a The Nature Conservancy Science Office a Monroe County Planning Commission a F. X. Browne, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 WETLANDS – WHAT ARE THY EXACTLY? 2 WETLAND TYPES 4 WETLANDS CLASSIFICATION 7 PENNSYLVANIA WETLANDS 13 THE THREE H’S: HYDROLOGY, HYDRIC SOILS, AND HYDROPHYTES 15 ARE WETLANDS IMPORTANT? 19 THE FUNCTIONS AND VALUES OF WETLANDS 20 WETLANDS PROTECTION 22 DETERMINING THE WETLANDS BOUNDARY 26 TOBYHANNA CREEK/TUNKANNOCK CREEK WATERSHED ASSOCIATION 28 REFERENCES 30 HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT #1 – TEST YOUR WETLAND IQ: WHAT DO YOU KNOW ABOUT WETLANDS????? HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT #2 – USING PLANT IDENTIFICATION GUIDES HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT #3 – POSITION PAPER FIELD STUDY #1 – FORESTED WETLANDS FIELD STUDY #2 – THE BOG APPENDIX A – PLANT PHOTOGRAPHS – BOG SITE APPENDIX B – PLANT KEYS – BOG SITE APPENDIX C – WETLANDS DELINEATION FIELD DATA SHEETS APPENDIX D – BOG SITE FIELD DATA SHEETS APPENDIX E – GLOSSARY OF TERMS INTRODUCTION Wetlands have not always been a subject of study.
    [Show full text]
  • E-News Summer 2016
    Summer Newsletter June 2016 Welcome to our Summer Newsletter Contributions to our newsletters are always welcome – please contact Shona at [email protected] or the postal address below. If you do not wish to receive our newsletter in the future, simply reply to this message with the word ‘unsubscribe’ in the title – thank you. Scotland Team: (Paul Kirkland, Tom Prescott, Shona Greig, David Hill, Anthony McCluskey) Butterfly Conservation Scotland Balallan House, Allan Park, Stirling, FK8 2QG t: 01786 447753 e: [email protected] w: www.butterfly-conservation.org/scotland Join us on Facebook! By joining us on Facebook, you can keep up to date with the latest news and sightings! Send us your photos and let us know what’s going on where you are and cheer up your newsfeed and compare notes with others passionate about butterflies, moths and the natural world! Be friends with us at www.facebook.com/bcscotland Follow us on Twitter! www.twitter.com/BC_Scotland Gardening Scotland 2016 After a break of almost 5 years we took a stand at Scotland’s largest garden festival at Ingliston, Edinburgh at the start of June. Our stand formed part of the Living Garden section, a lovely horseshoe of environmental charities and NGOs with intricately designed pallet gardens showcased in the centre. We had a wonderful weekend, meeting the public and had the opportunity to publicise our new Allotment Butterfly Survey as well as encourage people to take part in this year’s Big Butterfly Count. Royal Highland Show 2016 We had a brilliant weekend at the Royal Highland Show, Edinburgh chatting to the public and showing them our Emperor Moth caterpillars as well as making butterfly fingerpuppets with the kids! A big thank-you to the RSPB who very kindly invited us to share their marquee space, and of course to all our volunteers for their time, enthusiasm and goodwill over both the above events – it was very much appreciated! DATES FOR YOUR DIARY It’s not long now until our Big Butterfly Count kicks off again.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheshire & Lancashire Lowland Bog Spider Surveys 2018
    Male Sibianor larae from Holcroft Moss © Richard Gallon Cheshire & Lancashire lowland bog spider surveys 2018 Richard Burkmar – Area Organiser of the national Spider Recording Scheme (British Arachhological Society) for the vice counties of Cheshire, South Lancashire and West Lancashire. Contents Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Site accounts ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Winmarleigh Moss .............................................................................................................................. 5 Red Moss ............................................................................................................................................. 6 Highfield Moss .................................................................................................................................... 7 Little Woolden Moss ........................................................................................................................... 8 Cadishead Moss .................................................................................................................................. 9 Holcroft Moss ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mosses of Salair-Kuznetsk Region (Altai-Sayan
    Arctoa (2014) 23: 33-62 doi: 10.15298/arctoa.23.06 MOSSES OF SALAIR-KUZNETSK REGION (ALTAI-SAYAN MOUNTAIN COUNTRY) AND ADJACENT PLAINS OF WEST SIBERIA МХИ САЛАИРО-КУЗНЕЦКОГО РЕГИОНА (АЛТАЕ-САЯНСКАЯ ГОРНАЯ ОБЛАСТЬ) И ПРИЛЕГАЮЩИХ ТЕРРИТОРИЙ ЗАПАДНО-СИБИРСКОЙ РАВНИНЫ OLGA YU. PISARENKO1 ОЛЬГА Ю. ПИСАРЕНКО1 Abstract The paper summarizes the data of long-term bryological explorations in south-eastern part of West Siberia – in territories at the junction of the West Siberian plain and adjacent north-western part of Altai-Sayan Mountain region. The list includes 425 moss species of 49 families and 160 genera. Taxa are characterized by their occurrence in 9 phytogeographic subdivisions, as well as by the altigudinal range. Annotations and bibliography are included. Moss flora of individual regions and species distri- bution within the area are discussed. Резюме Обобщены данные многолетних бриологических исследований в юго-западной части Сибири – на территориях на стыке Западно-Сибирской равнины и Алтае-Саянской горной страны. Список мхов включает 425 видов из 49 семейств и 160 родов; указаны распределение и встречаемость видов по 9 фитогеографическим регионам территории; по отдельным видам даны комментарии. Обсуждаются особенности бриофлоры рассматриваемых регионов и закономерности распре- деления видов. Приводится библиография. KEYWORDS: brophytes, flora, phytogeography, West Siberian Plain, Salair Ridge, Kuznetsky Alatau Range, Kulunda Steppe, Baraba Steppe, Vasyugan Plain INTRODUCTION STUDY AREA The study area lies in the center of Eurasia, where The territory under discussion stretches for ober 800 the West Siberian plain transits to the Altai-Sayan moun- km from west to east and for about 600 km from north to tain region. The West Siberian plane is the largest low- south.
    [Show full text]
  • H3/4 Western Cadishead and Irlam
    Greater Manchester Spatial Framework and Salford Local Plan Archaeological Assessment: H3/4 Western Cadishead and Irlam Client: Salford City Council Desk based Assessment: Steve Tamburello © CfAA: Greater Manchester Spatial Framework and Salford Local Plan Archaeological Assessment : H3/4 Western Cadishead and Irlam 1 Site Location: The Site is located to the north-west of Cadishead and Irlam,and is bordered by the A580 to the north and Glaze Brook to the west. NGR: Centred on NGR SJ 71261 93997 Internal Ref: SA/2018/73 Prepared for: Salford City Council Document Title: Greater Manchester Spatial Framework and Salford Local Plan Archaeological Assessment: H3/4 Western Cadishead and Irlam Document Type: Desk-based Assessment Version: Version 1.3 Author: Steve Tamburello Position: Supervising Archaeologist Date: November 2018 Approved by: Ian Miller BA FSA Position: Assistant Director Date: November 2018 Signed: Copyright: Copyright for this document remains with the Centre for Applied Archaeology, University of Salford. Contact: Salford Archaeology, Centre for Applied Archaeology, Peel Building, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT Telephone: 0161 295 4467 Email: Disclaimer: This document has been prepared by Salford Archaeology within the Centre for Applied Archaeology, University of Salford, for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be used or relied upon for any other project without an independent check being undertaken to assess its suitability and the prior written consent and authority obtained from the Centre for Applied Archaeology. The University of Salford accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequences of this document being used for a purpose other than those for which it was commissioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Land & Biological Resources
    Brodhead Watershed Conservation Plan Land & Biological Resources The Brodhead watershed consists primarily of small communities, rural areas, farmland, and forests, with pockets of urbanization found mostly in the southern part of the watershed, in Stroudsburg and East Stroudsburg Boroughs and Smithfield and Stroud Townships. The dominant land cover in the watershed is forest, at 84 percent. Deciduous forest is the most common type, at 67 percent, or 122,384 acres. Mixed forest covers over 10 percent of the watershed, or 18,982 acres. Evergreen forest covers nearly 7 percent of the watershed, or about 12,355 acres. Residential use accounts for 3.7 percent of the land use in the watershed, or 6,771 acres. Soil Characteristics Soils Types Like geology, soils play an important role in determining stream chemistry, and are also important for development and land planning purposes. Properties such as thickness, texture, and moisture capacity make some soil associations better suited to certain uses, such as agriculture or development, than others. The Brodhead Creek and its tributaries flow through eight major soil associations. These include the Lackawanna-Wellsboro- Oquaga, Wurtsboro-Swartswood-Volusia, Clymer-Buchanan, Wellsboro-Morris- Lackawanna, Lordstown-Oquaga, Mardin-Bath-Volusia, Benson-Rock outcrop, and the Wyoming-Chenango-Pope. The northwest portion of the watershed consists almost entirely of deep soils formed in glacial till, such as the Lackawanna-Wellsboro-Oquaga, Wurtsboro-Swartswood-Volusia, Clymer-Buchanan, and Wellsboro-Morris-Lackawanna Associations. It also contains pockets of moderately deep soils formed in glacial till: the Lordstown-Oquaga Association. An area extending from Stroudsburg west to the Brodheadsville area also consists of moderately deep soils formed in glacial till; the Mardin-Bath-Volusia Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Appropriate Assessment Screening Report Derrycashel Bog, Co
    Derrycashel Bog, Co Roscommon Decommissioning and Rehabilitation 2021 Article 6(3) Appropriate Assessment Screening Report Article 6(3) Appropriate Assessment Screening Report Derrycashel Bog, Co Roscommon Decommissioning and Rehabilitation 2021 DOCUMENT DETAILS Client: Bord na Móna Project Title: Derrycashel Bog, Co Roscommon Decommissioning and Rehabilitation 2021 Project Number: 201008 Document Title: Article 6(3) Appropriate Assessment Screening Report Document File AASR F – 2021.04.28- 201008 Name: Prepared By: MKO Tuam Road Galway Ireland H91 VW84 Rev Status Date Author(s) Approved By 01 Draft 24/03/2021 IR PR 01 Final 28/04/2021 IR PR Derrycashel Bog, Co Roscommon Decommissioning and Rehabilitation 2021 Article 6(3) Appropriate Assessment Screening Report Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................ 1 1.1 Background ...................................................... 1 1.2 Appropriate Assessment .......................................... 1 1.2.1 Screening for Appropriate Assessment ...................... 1 1.2.2 Appropriate Assessment (Natura Impact Statement) .......... 2 1.2.3 Statement of authority .................................... 2 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT AND BASELINE ENVIRONMENT ................3 2.1 Site details .................................................... 3 2.1.1 Site location ............................................. 3 2.1.2 Site description .......................................... 3 2.2 Characteristics of the Peatland Climate Action Scheme ..........
    [Show full text]
  • Bog HELPR: Bog History, Ecosystem Status and Land- Use for Peatland Restoration in Ohio
    Bog HELPR: Bog History, Ecosystem status and Land- use for Peatland Restoration in Ohio PIs: G. Matt Davies1* & Gil Bohrer2* Contributing authors: Julie Slater1, Yushan Hao1,3, Roger Grau Andres1, Yueh-Fen Li3, Virginia Rich3, Camilo Rey Sanchez2 1School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, Kottman Hall, 2021 Coffey Road, Columbus, OH 43210. 2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Ohio State University, Hitchcock Hall, 2070 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH 43210. 3Department of Microbiology, 105 Biological Sciences Building, 484 W. 12th Ave, Columbus OH, 43210 *Corresponding authors: G. Matt Davies - Tel: 614 292 3567, Email: [email protected]; Gil Bohrer - Tel: 614 292 4178, Email [email protected] Contents PART 1 – RESEARCH REPORT ................................................................................................................ 2 1. Problem and Research Objectives ........................................................................................................ 2 2. Methodology ......................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Mapping and classifying Ohio’s peat bogs ...................................................................................... 3 2.2 Peat bog hydrochemistry ................................................................................................................ 4 2.3 Vegetation community composition .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Natural Areas Inventory of Monroe County, Pennsylvania
    A Natural Areas Inventory of Monroe County, Pennsylvania Document includes the original 1991 full report followed by the 1999 update addendum. This Natural Areas Inventory was conducted by Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program 208 Airport Drive Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057 For The Monroe County Planning Commission Monroe County Courthouse Stroudsburg, PA 1 83 60 A NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF MONROE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 1991 Anthony F. Davis, Ecologist Gregory J. Edhger, Ecology Research Assistant Sarah B. Andersen, Ecology Research Assistant Anthony M. Wilkinson, Coordinator/Zoologist Jill R. Belfonti, Data Manager Pennsylvania Science Office of The Nature Conservancy 34 Airport Drive Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057 for The Monroe County Planning Commission Monroe County Courthouse Stroudsburg, PA 183 60 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE .--- - .- - ---- --- - - ---- - ; ----XCKNOWLiEDGMENTS . .;. GLOSSARY.......................m.mm..m.. 2 INTRODUCTION.............m~..~m.m....m..m 4 COUNTY OVERVIEW..............mm......m....m....m 5 PENNSYLVANIA NATURAL DIVERSITY INVENTORY DATA SYSTEM....... 10 NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY METHODS. .....m.m..mm...m. ..ma ..a. 11 SUINARY AND RECOMMENDATIONSem............*.m....m... 14 RESULTS OF THE INVENTORY........................e...... 34 LITERATURE CITED.......m..mm.........m...........m.........l28 APPENDICES I. Federal and State Endangered Species Categories, Global and State Element Ranks.......l29 11. Element Occurrence Quality Ranks.................135 111. potential Natural Area Inventory Forms...........137 IV. Recommended Natural Area Inventory Fonn..........139 V. Natural Community Types in Pennsylvania ..........140 VI. special Animals and Plants in the County .........147 Note: This report is printed entirely on recycled paper. i This study was developed in part with financial assistance from the Recreational Improvement and Rehabilitation Grant Program (RIRA-ST-5-90) administered by the Pennsylvania Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright Irish Manuscripts Commission
    DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE BOGS COMMISSIONERS 1809–1813 Commission Edited by ARNOLD HORNER Manuscripts Irish Copyright IRISH MANUSCRIPTS COMMISSION 2019 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS VII ABBREVIATIONS IX LIST OF BOGS COMMISSIONERS, 1809–1813 XI LIST OF DISTRICT ENGINEERS, 1809–1813 XI LIST OF TABLES XIII LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS XV PREFACE XIX INTRODUCTION XXI THE FORMATION OF THE BOGS COMMISSIONERS CommissionXXI THE COMMISSIONERS XXV THE MINUTE BOOK XXIX THE MINUTE BOOK AS IT IS PRESENTED HERE XXXVIII IDENTIFICATION OF DISTRICTS XXXIX OTHER EDITORIAL NOTES XL MINUTE BOOK OF THE COMMISSIONERS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OFManuscripts BOGS IN IRELAND, 1809–1813 1 ACCOUNTS OF THE COMMISSIONERS, 15 SEPTEMBERIrish 1809 TO 5 JANUARY 1812 129 APPENDICES 141 1. Documents relating to the formation of the Bogs Commissioners, 1809 143 2. Text of the Act of Parliament establishing the CopyrightBogs Commissioners, 15 June 1809 148 3. Instructions issued to Engineers, September 1809, with additional instructions, May 1810 153 4. Manuscript materials relating to the Bogs Commissioners now deposited in the National Library of Ireland 160 5. Manuscript materials related to the Bogs Commissioners in repositories other than the National Library of Ireland 195 6. Principal parliamentary papers relating to the Bogs Commissioners 198 7. District reports, maps and other diagrams in the printed reports of the Bogs Commissioners 202 8. District names and associated engineers 224 INDEX 226 Commission Manuscripts Irish Copyright INTRODUCTION n operation between 1809 and 1813, the Bogs Commissioners were a government-appointed body given the task of appraising the development Ipotential of the bogs of Ireland. In fulfilment of their remit, they organised a series of district surveys with reports and maps that embody an exceptional range of detail on a major feature of the Irish landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Manchester Mosslands SAC Astley and Bedford Moss, Holcroft Moss, Risley Moss
    Manchester Mosslands SAC Astley and Bedford Moss, Holcroft Moss, Risley Moss Item Type monograph Publisher Environment Agency Download date 06/10/2021 17:37:21 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/27250 HABITATS DIRECTIVE Review of Consents Stage 1 and 2 Manchester Mosslands SAC Astley and Bedford Moss Holcroft Moss Risley Moss SUMMARY - MANCHESTER MOSSLANDS cS AC Manchester Mosslands cS AC No. identified at Stage 1 No. assessed at stage 2 as potential ‘likely significant effect’ Astley & Holcroft Risley Astley & Holcroft Risley Bedford Bedford Water Quality 53 38 29 0 0 0 Discharge Consents Waste 30 26 20 0 0 0 Management Licences Abstraction 17 13 13 0 0 1 Licences IPC/IPPC Permits 42 24 30 < 21 17 19 RAS 0 0 2 0 0 0 TOTAL 142 101 104 21 17 20 Search Criteria Criteria used in screening for stage 1 of the Review of Consents is in accordance with the Environment Agency technical guidance. Distances have been measured from the boundary of the European site, where these are made up of a number of SSSIs each has been considered separately. The following table outlines the criteria used for each type of consent: Screening criteria for review of consents. Consent Type Buffer Zone Water Quality Consents Within 3 km Water Resources abstractions Within 3 km Waste Management Licenses Landfills within 5km Licensed waste management facilities within 2km PIR Authorisations IPPC permissions within 10km Power stations within 15km RAS - nuclear sites within 5km others licensed for disposal e.g. hospitals within 1km Methodology GIS Arcview has been used to identify consents within the specified distances of each component of the Manchester Mosslands cSAC respectively; data held within GIS Arcview comes directly from public register databases (this information is updated routinely as new consents are issued).
    [Show full text]