DOCSLIB.ORG

Game Heads List SN Alphabetical Aktuell

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ETC® Species List Game Heads © ETC® Organization Category Scientific Name alphabetical English Name G2 Acinonyx jubatus Cheetah G3 Addax nasomaculatus Addax G3 Aepyceros melampus Impala G3 Alcelaphus buselaphus Hartebeest G3 Alces alces Eurasian Elk/Moose G1 Alopex lagopus Arctic Fox G3 Ammotragus lervia Barbary Sheep G3 Antidorcas marsupialis Springbok G3 Axis axis Axis Deer G1 Bassariscus astutus Ringtail Cat G3 Bison bonasus European Bison G3 Bos primigenius Aurochs G3 Bubalus bubalis Domestic Water Buffalo G3 Camelus dromedarius One-humped Camel G2 Canis aureus Golden Jackal G2 Canis latrans Coyote G2 Canis lupus Wolf G3 Capra aegagrus Wild Goat G3 Capra caucasia West Caucasian Tur G3 Capra cylindricornis East Caucasian Tur G3 Capra ibex Alpine Ibex G3 Capra nubica Nubian Ibex G3 Capra pyrenaica Iberian Ibex G2 Capreolus capreolus European Roe Deer G3 Capreolus pygargus Siberian Roe Deer G2 Caracal caracal Caracal G1 Castor canadensis American/Canadian Beaver G1 Castor fiber Eurasian Beaver G1 Cephalophus rufilatus Red-flanked Duiker G3 Cervus elaphus Red Deer G3 Cervus nippon Sika Deer G3 Dama dama Common fallow Deer G3 Dama mesopotamica Mesopotamian Fallow Deer G3 Equus africanus African Wild Ass G3 Equus ferus Wild Horse G3 Equus hemionus Asiatic Wild Ass/Onager G3 Equus quagga Plains Zebra G1 Felis chaus Jungle Cat G2 Felis concolor Mountain Lion/Cougar G1 Felis manul Pallas's Cat G1 Felis margarita Sand Cat G1 Felis silvestris Wildcat G3 Gazella cuvieri Cuvier's Gazelle G2 Gazella dorcas Dorcas Gazelle G2 Gazella gazella Mountain Gazelle G2 Gazella leptoceros Slender-horned Gazelle G2 Gazella subgutturosa Goitered Gazelle G1 Genetta genetta Common Genet G3 Gorilla gorilla Western Gorilla G1 Gulo gulo Wolverine G2 Halichoerus grypus Grey Seal G1 Herpestes edwardsi Indian Grey Mongoose G1 Herpestes ichneumon Egyptian Mongoose G1 Herpestes javanicus Small Asian Mongoose G2 Hyaena hyaena Striped Hyaena G1 Hydropotes inermis Chinese Water Deer G3 Kobus ellipsiprymnus Waterbuck G2 Leptailursus serval Serval G1 Lepus europaeus European Hare/Brown hare G1 Lutra lutra European Otter G2 Lynx canadensis Canada Lynx G2 Lynx lynx Eurasian Lynx G2 Lynx pardinus Iberian Lynx G1 Lynx rufus Bobcat G1 Marmota marmota Alpine Marmot G1 Martes foina Beech Marten G1 Martes martes European Pine Marten G1 Martes zibellina Sable G1 Meles leucurus Asian Badger G1 Meles meles European Badger G1 Mellivora capensis Honey Badger G1 Micromys minutus Harvest Mouse G1 Muntiacus reevesi Reeves's Muntjac G1 Mustela erminea Ermine/Stoat G1 Mustela eversmannii Steppe Polecat G1 Mustela lutreola European Mink G1 Mustela nivalis Least Weasel G1 Mustela putorius European Polecat G1 Mustela sibirica Siberian Weasel G3 Nanger dama Dama Gazelle G1 Nasua narica Coati G1 Neovison vison American Mink G1 Nyctereutes procyonoides Raccoon Dog G3 Odobenus rosmarus Walrus G3 Odocoileus virginianus White-tailed Deer G3 Oryx dammah Scimitar-horned Oryx G3 Oryx leucoryx White or Arabian Oryx G3 Ovibos moschatus Muskox G3 Ovis ammon Argali G3 Ovis orientalis Mouflon G3 Panthera leo Lion G3 Panthera onca Jaguar G2 Panthera pardus Leopard G3 Panthera tigris Tiger G1 Papio anubis Olive Baboon, female G2 Papio anubis Olive Baboon, male G2 Pecari tajacu Collared Peccary G2 Phoca vitulina Common Seal/Harbor Seal G1 Procyon lotor Raccoon G3 Rangifer tarandus Reindeer G1 Raphicerus campestris Steenbok G2 Rupicapra rupicapra (also R. pyrenaica) Alpine Chamois (also Pyrenean Chamois) G3 Saiga tatarica Steppe saiga G1 Sciurus vulgaris Eurasian Red Squirrel G3 Sus scrofa Wild Boar G2 Sylvicapra grimmia Common Duiker G3 Tragelaphus strepsiceros Greater Kudu G2 Tragelaphus sylvaticus Bushbuck G2 Ursus americanus American Black Bear G3 Ursus arctos Brown Bear G3 Ursus maritimus Polar Bear G1 Vormela peregusna Marbled Polecat G1 Vulpes cana Blanford's Fox G1 Vulpes corsac Corsac Fox G1 Vulpes rueppellii Rueppell's Fox G1 Vulpes vulpes Red Fox G1 Vulpes zerda Fennec Fox G1 = Small Game Heads / G2 = Medium Game Heads / G3 = Large Game Heads There is no claim to completeness of the list. Es besteht kein Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit der Liste. Il n'y a aucune prétention d'intégralité de la liste. Non c'è alcuna pretesa di completezza della lista. Species that are not on the list, will definitively be assigned by the competition chairman. Arten, die nicht auf der Liste sind, werden endgültig vom Competition Chairman eingeordnet. Espèces qui ne sont pas sur la liste, sont rangées définitivement par le directeur de la compétition. Species che non sono sulla lista, sono classificato definitivamente del direttore della competizione. Very large or very small specimens can be assigned, if necessary, on-site by the competition chairman in a different size category. Sehr große oder sehr kleine Exemplare können gegebenenfalls vor Ort vom Competition Chairman in eine andere Größenkategorie eingeordnet werden. Des spécimens très gros et très petits peuvent - le cas échéant – être classifiés dans une autre catégorie de grandeur sur place par le président de la competition. Esemplari molto grandi o molto piccoli possono eventualmente essere classificati sul posto in una categoria di taglia diversa dal presidente della competizione..
Recommended publications
  • The Mediterranean Forests Are Extraordinarily Beautiful, a Fascinating an Extraordinary Patrimony of Wealth Whose Conservation Can Be Highly Controversy

    The Mediterranean Forests Are Extraordinarily Beautiful, a Fascinating an Extraordinary Patrimony of Wealth Whose Conservation Can Be Highly Controversy

    THE editerraneanFORESTS mA NEW CONSERVATION STRATEGY 1 3 2 4 5 6 the unveiled a meeting point the mediterranean: amazing plant an unknown millennia forests on the global 200 the terrestrial current a brand new the state of WWF a new approach wealth of the of nature a sea of forests diversity animal world of human the wane in the sub-ecoregions mediterranean tool: the gap mediterranean in action for forest mediterranean and civilisations interaction with mediterranean in the forest cover analysis forests protection forests forests mediterranean 23 46 81012141617 18 19 22 24 7 1 Argania spinosa fruits, Essaouira, Morocco. Credit: WWF/P. Regato 2 Reed-parasol maker, Tunisia. Credit: WWF-Canon/M. Gunther 3 Black-shouldered Kite. Credit: Francisco Márquez 4 Endemic mountain Aquilegia, Corsica. Credit: WWF/P. Regato 5 Sacred ibis. Credit: Alessandro Re 6 Joiner, Kure Mountains, Turkey. Credit: WWF/P. Regato 7 Barbary ape, Morocco. Credit: A. & J. Visage/Panda Photo It is like no other region on Earth. Exotic, diverse, roamed by mythical WWF Mediterranean Programme Office launched its campaign in 1999 creatures, deeply shaped by thousands of years of human intervention, the to protect 10 outstanding forest sites among the 300 identified through cradle of civilisations. a comprehensive study all over the region. When we talk about the Mediterranean region, you could be forgiven for The campaign has produced encouraging results in countries such as Spain, thinking of azure seas and golden beaches, sun and sand, a holidaymaker’s Turkey, Croatia and Lebanon. NATURE AND CULTURE, of forest environments in the region. But in recent times, the balance AN INTIMATE RELATIONSHIP Long periods of considerable forest between nature and humankind has paradise.
  • The Taxonomic Status of Badgers (Mammalia, Mustelidae) from Southwest Asia Based on Cranial Morphometrics, with the Redescription of Meles Canescens

    The Taxonomic Status of Badgers (Mammalia, Mustelidae) from Southwest Asia Based on Cranial Morphometrics, with the Redescription of Meles Canescens

    Zootaxa 3681 (1): 044–058 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3681.1.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:035D976E-D497-4708-B001-9F8DC03816EE The taxonomic status of badgers (Mammalia, Mustelidae) from Southwest Asia based on cranial morphometrics, with the redescription of Meles canescens ALEXEI V. ABRAMOV1 & ANDREY YU. PUZACHENKO2 1Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 2Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Staromonetnyi per. 22, 109017 Moscow, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The Eurasian badgers (Meles spp.) are widespread in the Palaearctic Region, occurring from the British Islands in the west to the Japanese Islands in the east, including the Scandinavia, Southwest Asia and southern China. The morphometric vari- ation in 30 cranial characters of 692 skulls of Meles from across the Palaearctic was here analyzed. This craniometric anal- ysis revealed a significant difference between the European and Asian badger phylogenetic lineages, which can be further split in two pairs of taxa: meles – canescens and leucurus – anakuma. Overall, European badger populations are very sim- ilar morphologically, particularly with regards to the skull shape, but differ notably from those from Asia Minor, the Mid- dle East and Transcaucasia. Based on the current survey of badger specimens available in main world museums, we have recognized four distinctive, parapatric species: Meles meles, found in most of Europe; Meles leucurus from continental Asia; M.
  • Chromosomal Evolution in Raphicerus Antelope Suggests Divergent X

    Chromosomal Evolution in Raphicerus Antelope Suggests Divergent X

    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Chromosomal evolution in Raphicerus antelope suggests divergent X chromosomes may drive speciation through females, rather than males, contrary to Haldane’s rule Terence J. Robinson1*, Halina Cernohorska2, Svatava Kubickova2, Miluse Vozdova2, Petra Musilova2 & Aurora Ruiz‑Herrera3,4 Chromosome structural change has long been considered important in the evolution of post‑zygotic reproductive isolation. The premise that karyotypic variation can serve as a possible barrier to gene fow is founded on the expectation that heterozygotes for structurally distinct chromosomal forms would be partially sterile (negatively heterotic) or show reduced recombination. We report the outcome of a detailed comparative molecular cytogenetic study of three antelope species, genus Raphicerus, that have undergone a rapid radiation. The species are largely conserved with respect to their euchromatic regions but the X chromosomes, in marked contrast, show distinct patterns of heterochromatic amplifcation and localization of repeats that have occurred independently in each lineage. We argue a novel hypothesis that postulates that the expansion of heterochromatic blocks in the homogametic sex can, with certain conditions, contribute to post‑ zygotic isolation. i.e., female hybrid incompatibility, the converse of Haldane’s rule. This is based on the expectation that hybrids incur a selective disadvantage due to impaired meiosis resulting from the meiotic checkpoint network’s surveillance of the asymmetric expansions of heterochromatic blocks in the homogametic sex. Asynapsis of these heterochromatic regions would result in meiotic silencing of unsynapsed chromatin and, if this persists, germline apoptosis and female infertility. Te chromosomal speciation theory 1,2 also referred to as the “Hybrid dysfunction model”3, has been one of the most intriguing questions in biology for decades.
  • Population, Distribution and Conservation Status of Sitatunga (Tragelaphus Spekei) (Sclater) in Selected Wetlands in Uganda

    Population, Distribution and Conservation Status of Sitatunga (Tragelaphus Spekei) (Sclater) in Selected Wetlands in Uganda

    POPULATION, DISTRIBUTION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF SITATUNGA (TRAGELAPHUS SPEKEI) (SCLATER) IN SELECTED WETLANDS IN UGANDA Biological -Life history Biological -Ecologicl… Protection -Regulation of… 5 Biological -Dispersal Protection -Effectiveness… 4 Biological -Human tolerance Protection -proportion… 3 Status -National Distribtuion Incentive - habitat… 2 Status -National Abundance Incentive - species… 1 Status -National… Incentive - Effect of harvest 0 Status -National… Monitoring - confidence in… Status -National Major… Monitoring - methods used… Harvest Management -… Control -Confidence in… Harvest Management -… Control - Open access… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -Aim… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Tragelaphus spekii (sitatunga) NonSubmitted Detrimental to Findings (NDF) Research and Monitoring Unit Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) Plot 7 Kira Road Kamwokya, P.O. Box 3530 Kampala Uganda Email/Web - [email protected]/ www.ugandawildlife.org Prepared By Dr. Edward Andama (PhD) Lead consultant Busitema University, P. O. Box 236, Tororo Uganda Telephone: 0772464279 or 0704281806 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] Final Report i January 2019 Contents ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND GLOSSARY .......................................................... vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... viii 1.1Background ...........................................................................................................................
  • Morphological Aspects of the Brain in the Indian Grey Mongoose (Herpestes Edwardsii)

    Morphological Aspects of the Brain in the Indian Grey Mongoose (Herpestes Edwardsii)

    Iranian Journal of Veterinary Received: 2020- Mar- 06 Accepted after revision: 2020- Nov- 01 Science and Technology Published online: 2021- Feb- 27 Short communication DOI: 10.22067/ijvst.2020.39237 Morphological aspects of the brain in the Indian grey mongoose (Herpestes Edwardsii) Babak Rasouli, Soghra Gholami, Younes Kamali Department of Basic Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. ABSTRACT Mongoose is a common name for 29 to 34 species in 14 genera of the family Herpestidae which are found in vast areas of southwestern Asia, especially southern Iran. Anatomical and morphological studies of the brain have always been of interest to the researchers in the field of anatomy, due to its high importance in various fields of veterinary and zoology. Because of the lack of information about the brain structure in wild carnivores, the present study was conducted to better understand the morphological features in Indian grey mongoose. For this purpose, 4 carcasses of adult mongooses were used. They were found in different areas of Fars province. The mongooses had died due to natural causes. The brain was carefully separated from the skull and the measurements and observations were made on different parts of it. In this study, it wa found that the brain's structure has an ovoid appearance. Also, distinguished olfactory bulbs, deep transverse and longitudinal fissures, and relatively large cerebellar vermis were observed. Accord- ing to the current study, it can be concluded that the anatomical features of the brain in the mongoose are similar to those of other carnivores and are in perfect harmony with the sensory and motor capabilities of the animal.
  • Rewilding Watersheds: Using Nature's Algorithms to Fix Our Broken Rivers

    Rewilding Watersheds: Using Nature's Algorithms to Fix Our Broken Rivers

    Marine and Freshwater Research © CSIRO 2021 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF20335_AC Supplementary material Rewilding watersheds: using nature’s algorithms to fix our broken rivers Natalie K. RideoutA,G,1, Bernhard WegscheiderB,1, Matilda KattilakoskiA, Katie M. McGeeC,D, Wendy A. MonkE, and Donald J. BairdF ACanadian Rivers Institute, Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick, 10 Bailey Drive, Fredericton, NB, E3B 5A3, Canada. BCanadian Rivers Institute, Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick, 2 Bailey Drive, Fredericton, NB, E3B 5A3, Canada. CEnvironment and Climate Change Canada, Canada Centre for Inland Waters, 867 Lakeshore Road, Burlington, ON, L7R 4A6, Canada. DCentre for Biodiversity Genomics and Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E., Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada. EEnvironment and Climate Change Canada @ Canadian Rivers Institute, Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick, 2 Bailey Drive, Fredericton, NB, E3B 5A3, Canada. FEnvironment and Climate Change Canada @ Canadian Rivers Institute, Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick, 10 Bailey Drive, Fredericton, NB, E3B 5A3, Canada. GCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] 1These authors contributed equally to the work. Page 1 of 49 Table S1. References linking ecosystem functions with rewilding goals, providing supporting evidence for Fig. 1 Restore natural flow Mitigate climate Restore riparian Re-introduce Improve water quality Reduce habitat and sediment regime warming vegetation extirpated species fragmentation 1 Metabolism Aristi et al. 2014 Song et al. 2008 Wassenaar et al. 2010 Huang et al. 2018 Jankowski and Schindler 2019 2 Decomposition Delong 2010 Perry et al. 2011 Delong 2010 Wenisch et al.
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus

    Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus

    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
  • Central Eurasian Aridland Mammals Action Plan

    Central Eurasian Aridland Mammals Action Plan

    CMS CONVENTION ON Distr. General MIGRATORY UNEP/CMS/ScC17/Doc.13 SPECIES 8 November 2011 Original: English 17 th MEETING OF THE SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL Bergen, 17-18 November 2011 Agenda Item 17.3.6 CENTRAL EURASIAN ARIDLAND MAMMALS ACTION PLAN (Prepared by the Secretariat) Following COP Recommendation 9.1 the Secretariat has prepared a draft Action Plan to complement the Concerted and Cooperative Action for Central Eurasian Aridland Mammals. The document is a first draft, intended to stimulate discussion and identify further action needed to finalize the document in consultation with the Range States and other stakeholders, and to agree on next steps towards its implementation. Action requested: The 17 th Meeting of the Scientific Council is invited to: a. Take note of the document and provide guidance on its further development and implementation; b. Review and advise in particular on the definition of the geographic scope, including the range states, and the target species (listed in table 1); and c. Provide guidance on the terminology currently used for the Action Plan, agree on a definition of the term aridlands and/or consider using the term drylands instead. Central Eurasian Aridland Mammals Draft Action Plan Produced by the UNEP/CMS Secretariat November 2011 1 Content 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Vision and Main Priority Directions ...................................................................................................
  • Conservation Leadership Programme: Final Report Final Report

    Conservation Leadership Programme: Final Report Final Report

    Conservation Leadership Programme: Final Report Final Report 1. CLP project ID & Project title 03292116; Corridor Capacity Building Program in Northeast China for Amur Leopard 2. Host country, site location and the China; dates in the field Huangnihe Nature Reserve/Hunchun Nature Reserve; 90-100 days in the field 3. Names of any institutions involved in Local forestry department: Huangnihe organising the project or participating Nature Reserve, Hunchun Nature Reserve; NGO: WCS, Tiger and leopard Fund in Korea; Local community (Xibeicha forestry station); Local school (No.2 High school of Hunchun) 4. The overall aim summarised in 10–15 Aiming for Amur leopard habitat words expansion to potential habitats 5. Full names of author(s) YING LI, Hee Kyung RYOO, Hailong LI, Qing LI 6. Permanent contact address, email and Room 803, Building 85, Seoul National website University; [email protected]; [email protected] 7. Date which the report was completed 2018-3-31 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents Conservation Leadership Programme: Final Report .......................................................................................... 1 Instructions ..................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Project Partners & Collaborators ...........................................................................................................................
  • The 2008 IUCN Red Listings of the World's Small Carnivores

    The 2008 IUCN Red Listings of the World's Small Carnivores

    The 2008 IUCN red listings of the world’s small carnivores Jan SCHIPPER¹*, Michael HOFFMANN¹, J. W. DUCKWORTH² and James CONROY³ Abstract The global conservation status of all the world’s mammals was assessed for the 2008 IUCN Red List. Of the 165 species of small carni- vores recognised during the process, two are Extinct (EX), one is Critically Endangered (CR), ten are Endangered (EN), 22 Vulnerable (VU), ten Near Threatened (NT), 15 Data Deficient (DD) and 105 Least Concern. Thus, 22% of the species for which a category was assigned other than DD were assessed as threatened (i.e. CR, EN or VU), as against 25% for mammals as a whole. Among otters, seven (58%) of the 12 species for which a category was assigned were identified as threatened. This reflects their attachment to rivers and other waterbodies, and heavy trade-driven hunting. The IUCN Red List species accounts are living documents to be updated annually, and further information to refine listings is welcome. Keywords: conservation status, Critically Endangered, Data Deficient, Endangered, Extinct, global threat listing, Least Concern, Near Threatened, Vulnerable Introduction dae (skunks and stink-badgers; 12), Mustelidae (weasels, martens, otters, badgers and allies; 59), Nandiniidae (African Palm-civet The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is the most authorita- Nandinia binotata; one), Prionodontidae ([Asian] linsangs; two), tive resource currently available on the conservation status of the Procyonidae (raccoons, coatis and allies; 14), and Viverridae (civ- world’s biodiversity. In recent years, the overall number of spe- ets, including oyans [= ‘African linsangs’]; 33). The data reported cies included on the IUCN Red List has grown rapidly, largely as on herein are freely and publicly available via the 2008 IUCN Red a result of ongoing global assessment initiatives that have helped List website (www.iucnredlist.org/mammals).
  • Environmental Impact Report

    Environmental Impact Report

    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SUPPLEMENT TO THE REPORT ON THE ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT OF THE “CONSTRUCTION OF THE KARCINO-SARBIA WIND FARM (17 WIND TURBINES)” OF 2003 Name of the undertaking: KARCINO-SARBIA Wind Farm (under construction) Contractor: AOS Agencja Ochrony Środowiska Sp. z o.o. based in Koszalin Arch. No. 52/OŚ/OOS/06 Koszalin, September 2006 Team: Bogdan Gutkowski, M.Sc.Eng.– Expert for Environmental Impact Assessment Appointed by the Governor of the West Pomerania Province Marek Ziółkowski, M.Sc. Eng. – Environmental Protection Expert of the Ministry of Environmental Protection, Natural Resources and Forestry; Environmental Protection Consultant Dagmara Czajkowska, M.Sc. Eng. – Specialist for Environmental Impact Assessment, Specialist for Environmental Protection and Management Ewa Reszka, M.Sc. – Specialist for the Protection of Water and Land and Protection against Impact of Waste Damian Kołek, M.Sc.Eng. – Environmental Protection Specialist 2 CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 5 II. GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROJECT ..................................................... 9 1. Location and adjacent facilities....................................................................................................... 9 2. Modifications to the project .......................................................................................................... 10 3. Technical description of the project ..............................................................................................
  • Optimising the Value of By-Catch from Lynx Lynx Camera Trap Surveys in the Swiss Jura Region

    Optimising the Value of By-Catch from Lynx Lynx Camera Trap Surveys in the Swiss Jura Region

    ©KORA ©KORA Optimising the Value of By-catch from Lynx lynx Camera Trap Surveys in the Swiss Jura Region. Fiona Anne Pamplin 6th August 2013 ©KORA A dissertation submitted to the University of East Anglia, Norwich for the Master of Science degree in Applied Ecology and Conservation 2012-2013. ©This copy of the dissertation has been supplied on the condition that copyright rests with the author and that no information derived therefrom may be published without the author’s written consent. Copyright for all wildlife camera trap photographs used in this document rests with KORA and may not be reproduced in any media without prior permission from KORA, Switzerland. ©KORA Contents 1. Abstract ………………………………………………………………………………………. 4 2. Introduction………………………………………………………………………………… 5 3. Methods …………………………………………………………………………………….. 10 4. Results………………………………………………………………………………………… 18 5. Conclusion & Discussion……………….................................................. 29 6. Recommendations……………………………………………………………………... 34 7. References…………………………………………………………………………………. 37 8. Appendix …………………………………………………………...……………………... 42 2 Acknowledgements I am extremely grateful to Dr. Urs Breitenmoser (KORA) for providing me with the wonderful opportunity to work at KORA Switzerland and for allowing me to use the camera trap data for the purpose of this study. Many thanks also to Dr. Fridolin Zimmermann for granting me access to his treasure trove of camera trap photos, providing lots of helpful ideas, editing suggestions and supporting references. I am indebted to Danilo