Large Igneous Provinces: a Driver of Global Environmental and Biotic Changes, Geophysical Monograph 255, First Edition

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Large Igneous Provinces: a Driver of Global Environmental and Biotic Changes, Geophysical Monograph 255, First Edition 2 Radiometric Constraints on the Timing, Tempo, and Effects of Large Igneous Province Emplacement Jennifer Kasbohm1, Blair Schoene1, and Seth Burgess2 ABSTRACT There is an apparent temporal correlation between large igneous province (LIP) emplacement and global envi- ronmental crises, including mass extinctions. Advances in the precision and accuracy of geochronology in the past decade have significantly improved estimates of the timing and duration of LIP emplacement, mass extinc- tion events, and global climate perturbations, and in general have supported a temporal link between them. In this chapter, we review available geochronology of LIPs and of global extinction or climate events. We begin with an overview of the methodological advances permitting improved precision and accuracy in LIP geochro- nology. We then review the characteristics and geochronology of 12 LIP/event couplets from the past 700 Ma of Earth history, comparing the relative timing of magmatism and global change, and assessing the chronologic support for LIPs playing a causal role in Earth’s climatic and biotic crises. We find that (1) improved geochronol- ogy in the last decade has shown that nearly all well-dated LIPs erupted in < 1 Ma, irrespective of tectonic set- ting; (2) for well-dated LIPs with correspondingly well-dated mass extinctions, the LIPs began several hundred ka prior to a relatively short duration extinction event; and (3) for LIPs with a convincing temporal connection to mass extinctions, there seems to be no single characteristic that makes a LIP deadly. Despite much progress, higher precision geochronology of both eruptive and intrusive LIP events and better chronologies from extinc- tion and climate proxy records will be required to further understand how these catastrophic volcanic events have changed the course of our planet’s surface evolution. 2.1. INTRODUCTION heating of organic-, carbonate-, or evaporite-rich sedi- ments (Bond & Sun, Chapter 3 this volume; Mather & The observation that large igneous province (LIP) Schmidt, Chapter 4 this volume; Self et al., 2006; Svensen magmatism has in some cases occurred concurrently et al., 2004; Thordarson & Self, 1996). Determining with mass extinctions (Courtillot & Renne, 2003; Ernst, whether any of these mechanisms are important contrib- 2014; Ernst & Youbi, 2017; Ernst et al., Chapter 1 this utors to climate change requires understanding the rela- volume) leads to the question of whether there is a cause- tive rate of both extrusive and intrusive magmatism, and and-effect relationship between them. While various correlating these with paleoenvironmental records. The hypotheses exist as to how LIPs lead to catastrophic cli- only way to directly date the rates of LIP emplacement is mate change that can lead to ecosystem collapse and through radioisotope geochronology. Furthermore, as mass extinctions, they generally focus on volatile release LIP lava flows and biological evidence for mass extinc- from either magma-derived gases or indirectly through tions rarely occur in the same stratigraphic sections, making direct stratigraphic temporal correlation impos- 1Department of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, sible, geochronology is also essential to test the plausibil- New Jersey, USA ity of causality. 2United States Geological Survey, Volcano Science Center, Although a wide range of geochronologic techniques Menlo Park, California, USA have been applied to dating LIPs, uranium-lead (U-Pb) Large Igneous Provinces: A Driver of Global Environmental and Biotic Changes, Geophysical Monograph 255, First Edition. Edited by Richard E. Ernst, Alexander J. Dickson, and Andrey Bekker. © 2021 The Authors. Co-published 2021 by the American Geophysical Union and John Wiley and Sons, Inc. DOI: 10.1002/9781119507444.ch2 This is an open access publication under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 28 LARGE IGNEOUS PROVINCES and argon-argon (40Ar/39Ar) geochronometers are the and/or the environmental event had been the subject of most widely used geochronometers for this application recent high-precision geochronological study. To com- because their parent isotopes are characterized by long plement our narrative review below, we also present half-lives and relatively high concentrations in a variety tables detailing the samples included in our analysis of mineral phases (Reiners et al., 2017; Renne et al., (see Tables 2.1 and 2.2). This new compilation is able 1998a). Temporal correlation between some LIPs and to highlight some similarities and some differences mass extinctions was suggested over 30 years ago between LIPs that permit discussion of both the geody- (McLean, 1985), and this was rapidly tested using namics of LIPs and their timing relative to environmen- 40Ar/39Ar geochronology on basalts (Courtillot et al., tal catastrophes. 1986; Duncan & Pyle, 1988). However, not until the 1990s were 40Ar/39Ar and U-Pb geochronology used to demon- 2.1.1. Dating Methods for Large Igneous Provinces strate a temporal coincidence between the Siberian Traps LIP and the end-Permian mass extinction to within ~1 Most dates for LIPs and their corresponding environ- Ma (Campbell et al., 1992; Dalrymple et al., 1995; Renne mental perturbations are derived from the 40Ar/39Ar or & Basu, 1991; Kamo et al., 2003; Reichow et al., 2002). U-Pb techniques. Historically, 40Ar/39Ar studies have Attempts to further correlate LIPs and mass extinctions yielded a temporal framework of LIP emplacement at have both capitalized on and pushed the development of ~1% resolution (e.g., Barry et al., 2013; Kerr et al., 2003; higher precision geochronology. Because the duration of Marzoli et al., 2018; Renne et al., 1995), sufficient to the hypothesized individual environmental effects of establish a broad correlation, but in excess of that LIPs can vary in timescale from years (cooling associated required to resolve the relative timing of LIP emplace- with sulfate aerosols, acid rain, ozone depletion) to 100 ment relative to environmental change. This relatively ka (warming associated with CO2) (Black & Manga, coarse resolution is due to small concentrations of the 2017; Wignall, 2001), greater and greater precision is parent isotope, 40K, found in whole-rock basalt samples required to test hypotheses relating LIPs to paleoclimate or plagioclase separates. U-Pb geochronology can yield and paleontological records. Geochronological uncer- higher-precision dates (to better than ± 0.1%), but ame- tainties >1 Ma, which were commonplace in data sets nable minerals (e.g., zircon, baddeleyite) are not ubiqui- from the early efforts to date these events, obscure the tous in LIPs. With their particular strengths and relative timing of LIP eruptions versus global change on shortcomings, both techniques have been crucial to relevant climatic timescales, and limit assessment of the improving understanding of the connection between plausibility of a causal connection. However, the last dec- LIPs and environmental change, and working to better ade has seen dramatic improvement in the precision and understand that connection has produced methodologi- accuracy of dates generated by radiogenic geochronol- cal breakthroughs in both geochronometers. In this sec- ogy, such that recently published data sets can begin to tion, we will briefly describe the methodological advances compare and resolve relative timing differences between leading to improved accuracy and precision for both the onset and duration of LIP magmatism and potential techniques, with a stronger focus on U-Pb methods as downstream environmental effects, such as biotic decline, these have provided the majority of high-precision ages ecosystem deterioration, global warming and carbon discussed in this review. We follow the definitions of cycling, and sea level change. With methodological accuracy and precision summarized in Schoene et al. advances in U-Pb geochronology, it is now possible to (2013): An accurate date agrees with the actual age of an discern a coincidence of events with precision of 10–100 event within uncertainty, while precision is defined as the ka, allowing testing of a potential causal connections at reported uncertainties, which may include both random the sub-100 kyr level. However, further increases in ana- and systematic uncertainties (Renne et al., 1998b; lytical precision of dates for LIPs and of age models for Schoene, 2014). stratigraphic sections that contain paleoenvironmental The accuracy of 40Ar/39Ar dates has increased as meth- records will be required in order to resolve the timing of odology evolved from analyzing primarily LIP whole- environmental effects operating on shorter timescales, rock/groundmass samples, to more recent efforts focused such as cooling due to SO2. on analysis of aliquots of plagioclase or biotite separated In this chapter, after describing the methodological from basalts, or sanidines separated from intercalated advances that have led to improved accuracy and preci- silicic ashes. These recent studies have also used more sion in geochronology, we will review the geochronology careful means to handpick plagioclase grains to avoid the of 12 LIP–global environmental change couplets effects of weathering, and choosing grains of sufficient (Fig. 2.1). We chose to focus on LIPs that coincided in size to mitigate effects from 39Ar recoil (Renne et al., time with a dramatic global environmental
Recommended publications
  • Hikurangi Plateau: Crustal Structure, Rifted Formation, and Gondwana Subduction History
    Article Geochemistry 3 Volume 9, Number 7 Geophysics 3 July 2008 Q07004, doi:10.1029/2007GC001855 GeosystemsG G ISSN: 1525-2027 AN ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF THE EARTH SCIENCES Published by AGU and the Geochemical Society Click Here for Full Article Hikurangi Plateau: Crustal structure, rifted formation, and Gondwana subduction history Bryan Davy Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, P.O. Box 30368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand ([email protected]) Kaj Hoernle IFM-GEOMAR, Wischhofstraße 1-3, D-24148 Kiel, Germany Reinhard Werner Tethys Geoconsulting GmbH, Wischhofstraße 1-3, D-24148 Kiel, Germany [1] Seismic reflection profiles across the Hikurangi Plateau Large Igneous Province and adjacent margins reveal the faulted volcanic basement and overlying Mesozoic-Cenozoic sedimentary units as well as the structure of the paleoconvergent Gondwana margin at the southern plateau limit. The Hikurangi Plateau crust can be traced 50–100 km southward beneath the Chatham Rise where subduction cessation timing and geometry are interpreted to be variable along the margin. A model fit of the Hikurangi Plateau back against the Manihiki Plateau aligns the Manihiki Scarp with the eastern margin of the Rekohu Embayment. Extensional and rotated block faults which formed during the breakup of the combined Manihiki- Hikurangi plateau are interpreted in seismic sections of the Hikurangi Plateau basement. Guyots and ridge- like seamounts which are widely scattered across the Hikurangi Plateau are interpreted to have formed at 99–89 Ma immediately following Hikurangi Plateau jamming of the Gondwana convergent margin at 100 Ma. Volcanism from this period cannot be separately resolved in the seismic reflection data from basement volcanism; hence seamount formation during Manihiki-Hikurangi Plateau emplacement and breakup (125–120 Ma) cannot be ruled out.
    [Show full text]
  • Playing Jigsaw with Large Igneous Provinces a Plate Tectonic
    PUBLICATIONS Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems RESEARCH ARTICLE Playing jigsaw with Large Igneous Provinces—A plate tectonic 10.1002/2015GC006036 reconstruction of Ontong Java Nui, West Pacific Key Points: Katharina Hochmuth1, Karsten Gohl1, and Gabriele Uenzelmann-Neben1 New plate kinematic reconstruction of the western Pacific during the 1Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum fur€ Polar- und Meeresforschung, Bremerhaven, Germany Cretaceous Detailed breakup scenario of the ‘‘Super’’-Large Igneous Province Abstract The three largest Large Igneous Provinces (LIP) of the western Pacific—Ontong Java, Manihiki, Ontong Java Nui Ontong Java Nui ‘‘Super’’-Large and Hikurangi Plateaus—were emplaced during the Cretaceous Normal Superchron and show strong simi- Igneous Province as result of larities in their geochemistry and petrology. The plate tectonic relationship between those LIPs, herein plume-ridge interaction referred to as Ontong Java Nui, is uncertain, but a joined emplacement was proposed by Taylor (2006). Since this hypothesis is still highly debated and struggles to explain features such as the strong differences Correspondence to: in crustal thickness between the different plateaus, we revisited the joined emplacement of Ontong Java K. Hochmuth, [email protected] Nui in light of new data from the Manihiki Plateau. By evaluating seismic refraction/wide-angle reflection data along with seismic reflection records of the margins of the proposed ‘‘Super’’-LIP, a detailed scenario Citation: for the emplacement and the initial phase of breakup has been developed. The LIP is a result of an interac- Hochmuth, K., K. Gohl, and tion of the arriving plume head with the Phoenix-Pacific spreading ridge in the Early Cretaceous. The G.
    [Show full text]
  • LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned
    Space Sci Rev DOI 10.1007/s11214-011-9759-y LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned Jennifer L. Heldmann · Anthony Colaprete · Diane H. Wooden · Robert F. Ackermann · David D. Acton · Peter R. Backus · Vanessa Bailey · Jesse G. Ball · William C. Barott · Samantha K. Blair · Marc W. Buie · Shawn Callahan · Nancy J. Chanover · Young-Jun Choi · Al Conrad · Dolores M. Coulson · Kirk B. Crawford · Russell DeHart · Imke de Pater · Michael Disanti · James R. Forster · Reiko Furusho · Tetsuharu Fuse · Tom Geballe · J. Duane Gibson · David Goldstein · Stephen A. Gregory · David J. Gutierrez · Ryan T. Hamilton · Taiga Hamura · David E. Harker · Gerry R. Harp · Junichi Haruyama · Morag Hastie · Yutaka Hayano · Phillip Hinz · Peng K. Hong · Steven P. James · Toshihiko Kadono · Hideyo Kawakita · Michael S. Kelley · Daryl L. Kim · Kosuke Kurosawa · Duk-Hang Lee · Michael Long · Paul G. Lucey · Keith Marach · Anthony C. Matulonis · Richard M. McDermid · Russet McMillan · Charles Miller · Hong-Kyu Moon · Ryosuke Nakamura · Hirotomo Noda · Natsuko Okamura · Lawrence Ong · Dallan Porter · Jeffery J. Puschell · John T. Rayner · J. Jedadiah Rembold · Katherine C. Roth · Richard J. Rudy · Ray W. Russell · Eileen V. Ryan · William H. Ryan · Tomohiko Sekiguchi · Yasuhito Sekine · Mark A. Skinner · Mitsuru Sôma · Andrew W. Stephens · Alex Storrs · Robert M. Suggs · Seiji Sugita · Eon-Chang Sung · Naruhisa Takatoh · Jill C. Tarter · Scott M. Taylor · Hiroshi Terada · Chadwick J. Trujillo · Vidhya Vaitheeswaran · Faith Vilas · Brian D. Walls · Jun-ihi Watanabe · William J. Welch · Charles E. Woodward · Hong-Suh Yim · Eliot F. Young Received: 9 October 2010 / Accepted: 8 February 2011 © The Author(s) 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Asteroid Impact, Not Volcanism, Caused the End-Cretaceous Dinosaur Extinction
    Asteroid impact, not volcanism, caused the end-Cretaceous dinosaur extinction Alfio Alessandro Chiarenzaa,b,1,2, Alexander Farnsworthc,1, Philip D. Mannionb, Daniel J. Luntc, Paul J. Valdesc, Joanna V. Morgana, and Peter A. Allisona aDepartment of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, SW7 2AZ London, United Kingdom; bDepartment of Earth Sciences, University College London, WC1E 6BT London, United Kingdom; and cSchool of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, BS8 1TH Bristol, United Kingdom Edited by Nils Chr. Stenseth, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, and approved May 21, 2020 (received for review April 1, 2020) The Cretaceous/Paleogene mass extinction, 66 Ma, included the (17). However, the timing and size of each eruptive event are demise of non-avian dinosaurs. Intense debate has focused on the highly contentious in relation to the mass extinction event (8–10). relative roles of Deccan volcanism and the Chicxulub asteroid im- An asteroid, ∼10 km in diameter, impacted at Chicxulub, in pact as kill mechanisms for this event. Here, we combine fossil- the present-day Gulf of Mexico, 66 Ma (4, 18, 19), leaving a crater occurrence data with paleoclimate and habitat suitability models ∼180 to 200 km in diameter (Fig. 1A). This impactor struck car- to evaluate dinosaur habitability in the wake of various asteroid bonate and sulfate-rich sediments, leading to the ejection and impact and Deccan volcanism scenarios. Asteroid impact models global dispersal of large quantities of dust, ash, sulfur, and other generate a prolonged cold winter that suppresses potential global aerosols into the atmosphere (4, 18–20). These atmospheric dinosaur habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Midcontinent Rift
    VOL. 97 NO. 18 15 SEP 2016 NORTH AMERICA’S MIDCONTINENT RIFT Augmented Reality for Earth Science Quirky Geoscience Tunes Future of AGU Meetings NEW in Fall 2016 GeoHealth will foster the intersection of Earth science disciplines (Earth processes, climate change, atmospheric and ocean sciences, hydrology, among others), with those of the health sciences, defined broadly (environmental and ecosystem health and services, human and agricultural health, geomedicine, and the impact of natural hazards). Now Accepting Applications for Two Editors in Chief of GeoHealth AGU is launching GeoHealth under Founding Editor Rita R. Colwell. We are seeking applications for two dynamic, well-organized scientists with high editorial standards and strong leadership skills to serve 4-year terms as the editors in chief (EICs) to lead this exciting journal starting in 2017 and beyond. One editor’s main area of focus will be on the geosciences, while the other editor’s main area of focus will be on health. This is an important opportunity to help shape and lead this increasingly important, cross-cutting discipline. The EICs will be the principal architects of the scientific content of the journal. They are active scientists, well-known and well-regarded in their respective discipline. The EICs must be active in soliciting the best science from the best scientists to be published in the journal. Working with the other editors and AGU staff, EICs are the arbiter of the content of the journal. Among other functions, EICs will be responsible for: • Acting as an ambassador to the author/editor/reviewer/scientist community. • Setting the strategy for the journal.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Report: the Siberian Traps and the End-Permian Mass Extinction
    Project Report: The Siberian Traps and the end-Permian mass extinction During the summer of 2008, I spent a month and a half in the field in Arctic Siberia. The eruption of the Siberian Traps ca. 252 million years ago was one of the greatest volcanic cataclysms in the geologic record, and may have been associated with the most severe biotic crisis since the Cambrian radiation. The remnants of this volcanism are exposed along the remote Kotuy River in Siberia (Figure 1). The causes of the end-Permian mass extinction, during which > 90% of marine species vanished forever, remain poorly understood. The apparently coincident eruption of the Siberian Traps large igneous province—which is one of the most voluminous continental flood basalt provinces in Phanerozoic time—has been widely invoked as a potential trigger mechanism for the mass extinction (e.g. Campbell et al., 1992). By traveling to the scene of this ancient eruption in Siberia, I hoped to gather clues to the character and possible environmental consequences of the eruption. I accompanied a small team of scientists from Russia and MIT, including my doctoral advisor (Linda Elkins-Tanton). The Siberian Traps are difficult to reach, and logistics were complex. As shown in Figure Figure 1. White star marks the approximate location of field work in the summer of 2008, along the Kotuy River in Siberia (71°54 N, 102° 7’ E). Figure 2. We used small water craft to navigate the Kotuy River and reach the Siberian Traps volcanic stratigraphy. The cliffs shown here are limestones from the underlying sedimentary sequence.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsidence and Growth of Pacific Cretaceous Plateaus
    ELSEVIER Earth and Planetary Science Letters 161 (1998) 85±100 Subsidence and growth of Paci®c Cretaceous plateaus Garrett Ito a,Ł, Peter D. Clift b a School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology, POST 713, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA b Department of Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA Received 10 November 1997; revised version received 11 May 1998; accepted 4 June 1998 Abstract The Ontong Java, Manihiki, and Shatsky oceanic plateaus are among the Earth's largest igneous provinces and are commonly believed to have erupted rapidly during the surfacing of giant heads of initiating mantle plumes. We investigate this hypothesis by using sediment descriptions of Deep Sea Drilling Project (DSDP) and Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) drill cores to constrain plateau subsidence histories which re¯ect mantle thermal and crustal accretionary processes. We ®nd that total plateau subsidence is comparable to that expected of normal sea¯oor but less than predictions of thermal models of hotspot-affected lithosphere. If crustal emplacement was rapid, then uncertainties in paleo-water depths allow for the anomalous subsidence predicted for plumes with only moderate temperature anomalies and volumes, comparable to the sources of modern-day hotspots such as Hawaii and Iceland. Rapid emplacement over a plume head of high temperature and volume, however, is dif®cult to reconcile with the subsidence reconstructions. An alternative possibility that reconciles low subsidence over a high-temperature, high-volume plume source is a scenario in which plateau subsidence is the superposition of (1) subsidence due to the cooling of the plume source, and (2) uplift due to prolonged crustal growth in the form of magmatic underplating.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Impact-Generated Deposition
    EVIDENCE FOR IMPACT-GENERATED DEPOSITION ON THE LATE EOCENE SHORES OF GEORGIA by ROBERT SCOTT HARRIS (Under the direction of Michael F. Roden) ABSTRACT Modeling demonstrates that the Late Eocene Chesapeake Bay impact would have been capable of depositing ejecta in east-central Georgia with thicknesses exceeding thirty centimeters. A coarse sand layer at the base of the Upper Eocene Dry Branch Formation was examined for shocked minerals. Universal stage measurements demonstrate that planar fabrics in some fine to medium sand-size quartz grains are parallel to planes commonly exploited by planar deformation features (PDF’s) in shocked quartz. Possible PDF’s are observed parallel to {10-13}, {10-11}, {10-12}, {11-22} and {51-61}. Petrographic identification of shocked quartz is supported by line broadening in X-ray diffraction experiments. Other impact ejecta recognized include possible ballen quartz, maskelynite, and reidite-bearing zircon grains. The layer is correlative with an unusual diamictite that contains goethite spherules similar to altered microkrystites. It may represent an impact-generated debris flow. These discoveries suggest that the Chesapeake Bay impact horizon is preserved in Georgia. The horizon also should be the source stratum for Georgia tektites. INDEX WORDS: Chesapeake Bay impact, Upper Eocene, Shocked quartz, Impact shock, Shocked zircon, Impact, Impact ejecta, North American tektites, Tektites, Georgiaites, Georgia Tektites, Planar deformation features, PDF’s, Georgia, Geology, Coastal Plain, Stratigraphy, Impact stratigraphy, Impact spherules, Goethite spherules, Diamictite, Twiggs Clay, Dry Branch Formation, Clinchfield Sand, Irwinton Sand, Reidite, Microkrystite, Cpx Spherules, Impact debris flow EVIDENCE FOR IMPACT-GENERATED DEPOSITION ON THE LATE EOCENE SHORES OF GEORGIA by ROBERT SCOTT HARRIS B.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Effects of Large Igneous Province Magmatism: a Siberian Perspective Benjamin A
    20 Environmental effects of large igneous province magmatism: a Siberian perspective benjamin a. black, jean-franc¸ois lamarque, christine shields, linda t. elkins-tanton and jeffrey t. kiehl 20.1 Introduction Even relatively small volcanic eruptions can have significant impacts on global climate. The eruption of El Chichón in 1982 involved only 0.38 km3 of magma (Varekamp et al., 1984); the eruption of Mount Pinatubo in 1993 involved 3–5km3 of magma (Westrich and Gerlach, 1992). Both these eruptions produced statistically significant climate signals lasting months to years. Over Earth’s his- tory, magmatism has occurred on vastly larger scales than those of the Pinatubo and El Chichón eruptions. Super-eruptions often expel thousands of cubic kilo- metres of material; large igneous provinces (LIPs) can encompass millions of cubic kilometres of magma. The environmental impact of such extraordinarily large volcanic events is controversial. In this work, we explore the unique aspects of LIP eruptions (with particular attention to the Siberian Traps), and the significance of these traits for climate and atmospheric chemistry during eruptive episodes. As defined by Bryan and Ernst (2008), LIPs host voluminous (> 100,000 km3) intraplate magmatism where the majority of the magmas are emplaced during short igneous pulses. The close temporal correlation between some LIP eruptions and mass extinction events has been taken as evidence supporting a causal relationship (Courtillot, 1994; Rampino and Stothers, 1988; Wignall, 2001); as geochronological data become increasingly precise, they have continued to indicate that this temporal association may rise above the level of coincidence (Blackburn et al., 2013). Several obstacles obscure the mechanisms that might link LIP magmatism with the degree of global environmental change sufficient to trigger mass extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mantle Plume Origin for the Palaeoproterozoic Circum-Superior Large Igneous Province
    Accepted Manuscript A Mantle Plume Origin for the Palaeoproterozoic Circum-Superior Large Ig- neous Province T. Jake R. Ciborowski, Matthew J. Minifie, Andrew C. Kerr, Richard E. Ernst, Bob Baragar, Ian L. Millar PII: S0301-9268(16)30449-1 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2017.03.001 Reference: PRECAM 4687 To appear in: Precambrian Research Received Date: 14 October 2016 Revised Date: 24 January 2017 Accepted Date: 5 March 2017 Please cite this article as: T.J.R. Ciborowski, M.J. Minifie, A.C. Kerr, R.E. Ernst, B. Baragar, I.L. Millar, A Mantle Plume Origin for the Palaeoproterozoic Circum-Superior Large Igneous Province, Precambrian Research (2017), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2017.03.001 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. A Mantle Plume Origin for the Palaeoproterozoic Circum-Superior Large Igneous Province T. Jake R. Ciborowski*1,2, Matthew J. Minifie2, Andrew C. Kerr2, Richard E. Ernst3, Bob Baragar4, Ian L. Millar5 1School of Environment and Technology, University of Brighton, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UK 2School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Cardiff University, Main Building, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK 3Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6; Faculty of Geology and Geography, Tomsk State University, pr.
    [Show full text]
  • Petrology of the Noritic and Gabbronoritic Rocks Below the J-M Reef in the Mountain View Area, Stillwater Complex, Montana
    Petrology of the Noritic and Gabbronoritic Rocks below the J-M Reef in the Mountain View Area, Stillwater Complex, Montana U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1674-C Chapter C Petrology of the Noritic and Gabbronoritic Rocks below the J-M Reef in the Mountain View Area, Stillwater Complex, Montana By NORMAN J PAGE and BARRY C. MORING U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1674 CONTRIBUTIONS ON ORE DEPOSITS IN THE EARLY MAGMATIC ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1990 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section, U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Page, Norman, J Petrology of the noritic and gabbronoritic rocks below the J-M Reef in the Mountain View area, Stillwater Complex, Montana / by Norman J Page and Barry C. Moring. p. cm. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1674-C) (Contributions on ore deposits in the early magmatic environment Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.3: 1674-C 1. Petrology Beartooth Mountains Region (Mont, and Wyo.) 2. Geolo­ gy Beartooth Mountains Region (Mont, and Wyo.) I. Moring, Barry C. II. Title. III. Title: Stillwater Complex, Montana. IV. Series. V. Series: Contri­ butions on ore deposits in the early magmatic environment ; ch.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting the Deep Earth and the Atmosphere
    In Mantle Convection and Surface Expression (Cottaar, S. et al., eds.) AGU Monograph 2020 (in press) Connecting the Deep Earth and the Atmosphere Trond H. Torsvik1,2, Henrik H. Svensen1, Bernhard Steinberger3,1, Dana L. Royer4, Dougal A. Jerram1,5,6, Morgan T. Jones1 & Mathew Domeier1 1Centre for Earth Evolution and Dynamics (CEED), University of Oslo, 0315 Oslo, Norway; 2School of Geosciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa; 3Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany; 4Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut 06459, USA; 5DougalEARTH Ltd.1, Solihull, UK; 6Visiting Fellow, Earth, Environmental and Biological Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Abstract Most hotspots, kimberlites, and large igneous provinces (LIPs) are sourced by plumes that rise from the margins of two large low shear-wave velocity provinces in the lowermost mantle. These thermochemical provinces have likely been quasi-stable for hundreds of millions, perhaps billions of years, and plume heads rise through the mantle in about 30 Myr or less. LIPs provide a direct link between the deep Earth and the atmosphere but environmental consequences depend on both their volumes and the composition of the crustal rocks they are emplaced through. LIP activity can alter the plate tectonic setting by creating and modifying plate boundaries and hence changing the paleogeography and its long-term forcing on climate. Extensive blankets of LIP-lava on the Earth’s surface can also enhance silicate weathering and potentially lead to CO2 drawdown (cooling), but we find no clear relationship between LIPs and post-emplacement variation in atmospheric CO2 proxies on very long (>10 Myrs) time- scales.
    [Show full text]