DOCSLIB.ORG

Goose and Summer Lakes Basin Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Goose and Summer Lakes Basin Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan Goose and Summer Lakes Basin Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan October 2020 Developed by the Oregon Department of Agriculture and the Goose and Summer Lakes Basin Local Advisory Committee with support from the Lakeview and Fort Rock/Silver Lake Soil and Water Conservation Districts Oregon Department of Agriculture Lakeview & Fork Rock/Silver Lake SWCDs Water Quality Program 17162 Hwy 396 635 Capitol St. NE Lakeview, OR 97630 Salem, OR 97301 Phone: (541) 947-5855 Phone: (503) 986-4700 Website: oda.direct/AgWQPlan (This page is blank) Table of Contents Acronyms and Terms .....................................................................................................................................i Foreword .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Required Elements of Area Plans ............................................................................................................ 1 Plan Content ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Agricultural Water Quality Program ........................................................................... 3 1.1 Purpose of Agricultural Water Quality Program and Applicability of Area Plans .......... 3 1.2 History of the Ag Water Quality Program ............................................................................. 3 1.3 Roles and Responsibilities ......................................................................................................... 4 1.3.1 Oregon Department of Agriculture .................................................................................................................. 4 1.3.2 Local Management Agency ................................................................................................................................. 7 1.3.3 Local Advisory Committee .................................................................................................................................. 7 1.3.4 Agricultural Landowners ...................................................................................................................................... 7 1.3.5 Public Participation................................................................................................................................................. 8 1.4 Agricultural Water Quality ......................................................................................................... 8 1.4.1 Point and Nonpoint Sources of Water Pollution ......................................................................................... 8 1.4.2 Beneficial Uses and Parameters of Concern ................................................................................................ 9 1.4.3 Impaired Waterbodies and Total Maximum Daily Loads ......................................................................... 9 1.4.4 Oregon Water Pollution Control Law – ORS 468B.025 and 468B.050 .........................................10 1.4.5 Streamside Vegetation and Agricultural Water Quality........................................................................11 1.4.6 Soil Health and Agricultural Water Quality.................................................................................................12 1.5 Other Water Quality Programs ............................................................................................... 12 1.5.1 Confined Animal Feeding Operation Program ..........................................................................................13 1.5.2 Groundwater Management Areas ...................................................................................................................13 1.5.3 The Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds ...........................................................................................13 1.5.4 Pesticide Management and Stewardship ....................................................................................................13 1.5.5 Drinking Water Source Protection .................................................................................................................14 1.6 Partner Agencies and Organizations .................................................................................... 14 1.6.1 Oregon Department of Environmental Quality .........................................................................................14 1.6.2 Other Partners ........................................................................................................................................................15 1.7 Measuring Progress ................................................................................................................... 15 1.7.1 Measurable Objectives ........................................................................................................................................15 1.7.2 Land Conditions and Water Quality ...............................................................................................................16 1.7.3 Focused Implementation in Small Geographic Areas ............................................................................17 1.8 Progress and Adaptive Management .................................................................................... 17 Goose and Summer Lakes Basin Area Plan October 2020 1.8.1 Biennial Reviews ....................................................................................................................................................17 1.8.2 Water Quality Monitoring ...................................................................................................................................18 Chapter 2: Local Background ............................................................................................................ 19 2.1 Local Roles ................................................................................................................................... 20 2.1.1 Local Advisory Committee ................................................................................................................................20 2.1.2 Local Management Agency ...............................................................................................................................20 2.2 Area Plan and Area Rules: Development and History ..................................................... 21 2.3 Geographical and Physical Setting ....................................................................................... 21 2.3.1 Geography ................................................................................................................................................................21 2.3.2 Hydrology1.................................................................................................................................................................23 2.3.3 Land Use ....................................................................................................................................................................25 2.4 Agricultural Water Quality ....................................................................................................... 26 2.4.1 Water Quality Issues .............................................................................................................................................26 2.4.1.1 Beneficial Uses ..................................................................................................................................................26 2.4.1.2 WQ Parameters and 303(d) list..................................................................................................................27 2.4.1.3 TMDLs and Agricultural Load Allocations .............................................................................................29 2.4.1.4 Drinking Water...................................................................................................................................................29 2.4.2 Sources of Impairment ........................................................................................................................................30 2.5 Regulatory and Voluntary Measures .................................................................................... 30 2.5.1 Area Rules.................................................................................................................................................................30 2.5.2 Voluntary Measures ........................................................................................................................................31 2.5.2.1 Land Management ...........................................................................................................................................31 2.5.2.2 Optional Management Strategies .............................................................................................................33 Chapter 3: Implementation Strategies ........................................................................................... 35 3.1 Measurable Objectives and Strategic Initiatives............................................................... 35 3.1.1 Management Area .................................................................................................................................................35
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conservation Status of Threatened Fishes in Warner Basin, Oregon
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 50 Number 3 Article 5 10-31-1990 Conservation status of threatened fishes in arnerW Basin, Oregon Jack E. Williams Division of Wildlife and Fisheries, Bureau of Land Management, Washington, D.C. Mark A. Stern The Nature Conservancy, Portland, Oregon Alan V. Munhall Bureau of Land Management, Lakeview, Oregon Gary A. Anderson Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Lakeview, Oregon Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Williams, Jack E.; Stern, Mark A.; Munhall, Alan V.; and Anderson, Gary A. (1990) "Conservation status of threatened fishes in arnerW Basin, Oregon," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 50 : No. 3 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol50/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Creat &Isio N:l.luraUst 50(3), 1900, pp. 243-248 CONSERVATION STATUS OF THREATENED FISHES IN WARNER BASIN, OREGON 1 l 3 Jack E. Williams , MarkA. Stern \ Alan V. Munhall , and Cary A. Anderson"" A8S'TRACT.-Two fedemlJy listed fisbes, the Foskett speckled daceand Warnersucker, are endemic to Warner Basin in south central Oregon. The Foskett speckled dace is native only to a single spring in Coleman Valley. Anearby'spring was stocked with dace in 1979 and 1980, and now provides a second population. The present numbers ofdace probably are at their Wgbest levels since settlement ofthe region.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Abert Rim Wilderness Study Area, Lake County, Oregon
    Mineral Resources of the Abert Rim Wilderness Study Area, Lake County, Oregon U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1738-C AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the cur­ rent-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Sur­ vey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" Publications that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" are no longer available. Prices of reports released to the open files are given in the listing "U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports," updated month­ ly, which is for sale in microfiche from the U.S. Geological Survey, Books and Open-File Reports Section, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications of general in­ Books of the U.S. Geological Survey are available over the terest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single copies of Earthquakes counter at the following Geological Survey Public Inquiries Offices, all & Volcanoes, Preliminary Determination of Epicenters, and some mis­ of which are authorized agents of the Superintendent of Documents: cellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superintendent of Documents, are obtainable by mail from WASHINGTON, D.C.-Main Interior Bldg.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Study Areas
    I ___- .-ll..l .“..l..““l.--..- I. _.^.___” _^.__.._._ - ._____.-.-.. ------ FEDERAL LAND M.ANAGEMENT Status and Uses of Wilderness Study Areas I 150156 RESTRICTED--Not to be released outside the General Accounting Wice unless specifically approved by the Office of Congressional Relations. ssBO4’8 RELEASED ---- ---. - (;Ao/li:( ‘I:I)-!L~-l~~lL - United States General Accounting OfTice GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-262989 September 23,1993 The Honorable Bruce F. Vento Chairman, Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands Committee on Natural Resources House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: Concerned about alleged degradation of areas being considered for possible inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System (wilderness study areas), you requested that we provide you with information on the types and effects of activities in these study areas. As agreed with your office, we gathered information on areas managed by two agencies: the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLN) and the Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service. Specifically, this report provides information on (1) legislative guidance and the agency policies governing wilderness study area management, (2) the various activities and uses occurring in the agencies’ study areas, (3) the ways these activities and uses affect the areas, and (4) agency actions to monitor and restrict these uses and to repair damage resulting from them. Appendixes I and II provide data on the number, acreage, and locations of wilderness study areas managed by BLM and the Forest Service, as well as data on the types of uses occurring in the areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Warner Lakes- 17120007 FINAL
    Warner Lakes- 17120007 FINAL 8 Digit Hydrologic Unit Profile JANUARY 2005 Introduction The Warner Lakes 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) subbasin is 1,214,838 acres. Seventy-four percent of it is in Lake County in South Central Oregon. Sixteen percent is in Harney County and the remaining 10 percent is in California and Nevada. Eighty-three percent of the subbasin is in public ownership. Seventy-two percent of the private and public land in the subbasin is rangeland, ten percent is forest, eight percent is pasture and hay land. The subbasin is largely unpopulated, having only about forty farmers and ranchers on twenty-five farms. Conservation assistance is provided by three NRCS service centers, one soil survey office, and four Soil and Water Conservation Districts. Profile Contents Introduction Resource Concerns Physical Description Census and Social Data Landuse Map & Precipitation Map Progress/Status Common Resource Area Footnotes/Bibliography Relief Map The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, Produced by the sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons Water Resources with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s Planning Team TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). Portland, OR To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Wise May 2021
    May 2021 Lake Wise Page 1 LAKE WISE … a voice for quiet waters NEWSLETTER FROM OREGON LAKES ASSOCIATION MAY 2021 Annual Conference Sessions Connie Bozarth, Newsletter Manager Remote 1.5 to 2 hr Sessions IN THIS ISSUE Annual Conference of the Oregon Lakes Association (OLA) 2021 OLA Conference October/November October/November TBD (topics and dates to be determined) 2021 Scholarship Recipient Jamila Baig, UO Harmful Algae Blooms (HABS) Corner CyanoHABs outlook for Oregon CyanoHAB legislative action in Salem HABs research Careers in Freshwater Panel Recap Investigations of the Lower Deschutes Effect of Selective Water Withdrawal Structure on Water Quality Downstream of Lakes Billy Chinook and Simtustus Because of lingering uncertainties caused by the coronavirus pandemic and some advantages of short remote sessions spread Oregon Lakes in the News across several days, we will hold conference sessions using the same Drought Declared in Klamath Basin format as last year: connection via Zoom, with several 1.5 to 2 hr Camping to Open at Detroit Lake midweek sessions across October and November, avoiding the dates Keep an Eye on Fishing Gear! of face-to-face meetings that are being sponsored by WALPA (20-22 October) and NALMS (25-18 November). Drought Impacts-Spring 2021 Lake Abert and Upper Klamath Look for an invitation to submit abstracts soon, and a program Lake and registration info later! Forthcoming details on the conference event website May 2021 Lake Wise Page 2 2021 Oregon Lakes Association (OLA) Graduate Student Scholarship Recipient Contributed by Rich Miller, OLA Board Director OLA Awards 2021 Graduate Student Scholarship to Jamila Baig Oregon Lakes Association is pleased to award this year’s $1500 research scholarship to Jamila Baig, PhD candidate in the Environmental Sciences, Studies, and Policy and Geography Departments at University of Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • Chewaucan Redband Trout SMU
    Chewaucan Redband Trout SMU ESA Designation: State Status: Interim Assessment: Not Warranted 2000 Vulnerable Potentially at Risk The Chewaucan Redband Trout SMU consists of four populations, three in Lake Abert Basin and one in Summer Lake Basin. Lake Abert and Summer Lake are remnants of ancient Lake Chewaucan and naturally separated by large sand dunes. Redband trout in Lake Abert Basin are distributed throughout the basin and moderately abundant. Degraded habitat conditions and barriers to migration are the most persistent threats to populations in the SMU. Foster Creek population has an extremely limited distribution and is isolated from large water bodies and other populations. The SMU met four of the six interim criteria and is classified as ‘potentially at risk’. Limited data sets and inferences from other information for populations in this SMU provide a qualified level of confidence in the assessment of the interim criteria. Population Exist Dist. Abund. Prod. Ind. Hybrid Chewaucan Pass Pass Pass Pass* Pass Pass Willow Pass Pass Pass Fail* Pass Pass Crooked Pass Pass Pass Fail* Pass Pass Foster Pass Fail Pass* Fail* Pass Pass * Inferred Percent of Populations Meeting Criteria Exist Summer L. Distribution Abundance Productivity Independence Foster Hybridization 0 20406080100 Paisley") Abert L. Oregon Chewaucan Willow All criteria met Crooked 4-5 criteria met < 4 criteria met Extinct 92 2 Distribution - Fail Abundance - Pass 100 Total Great Basin 80 Chew aucan 60 40 20 % ofPopulations 0 <0.06 0.06-0.19 >0.19 Density of age 1+ Redband Trout (fish/m2) Redband Major Rivers • Year-around distribution is widespread in headwater • A population survey estimated 147,878 (95%CI +/- and mid order streams.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary Studies Near Summer Lake, Oregon Friends of the Pleistocene Ninth Annual Pacific Northwest Cell Field Trip September 28-30, 2001
    Quaternary Studies near Summer Lake, Oregon Friends of the Pleistocene Ninth Annual Pacific Northwest Cell Field Trip September 28-30, 2001 springs, bars, bays, shorelines, fault, dunes, etc. volcanic ashes and lake-level proxies in lake sediments N Ana River Fault N Paisley Caves Pluvial Lake Chewaucan Slide Mountain pluvial shorelines Quaternary Studies near Summer Lake, Oregon Friends of the Pleistocene Ninth Annual Pacific Northwest Cell Field Trip September 28-30, 2001 Rob Negrini, Silvio Pezzopane and Tom Badger, Editors Trip Leaders Rob Negrini, California State University, Bakersfield, CA Silvio Pezzopane, United States Geological Survey, Denver, CO Rob Langridge, Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, Lower Hutt, New Zealand Ray Weldon, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR Marty St. Louis, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Summer Lake, Oregon Daniel Erbes, Bureau of Land Management, Carson City, Nevada Glenn Berger, Desert Research Institute, University of Nevada, Reno, NV Manuel Palacios-Fest, Terra Nostra Earth Sciences Research, Tucson, Arizona Peter Wigand, California State University, Bakersfield, CA Nick Foit, Washington State University, Pullman, WA Steve Kuehn, Washington State University, Pullman, WA Andrei Sarna-Wojcicki, United States Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA Cynthia Gardner, USGS, Cascades Volcano Observatory, Vancouver, WA Rick Conrey, Washington State University, Pullman, WA Duane Champion, United States Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA Michael Qulliam, California State University, Bakersfield,
    [Show full text]
  • Abert and Summer Lakes, South-Central Oregon
    ... ( t.• CE'...,.. ~ - ~'>01..1.4_... ~ Dl - . ,, c E: 70. I V F' O I 12 "7.'t: I z Solute Balance at 'i.'] .J Abert and Summer Lakes, South-Central Oregon GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 502-C Solute Balance at Abert and Summer Lakes, South-Central Oregon By A. S. VAN DENBURGH CLOSED- BASIN INVESTIGATIONS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 502-C A description of the quantity and chemical character of incoming, outgoing, and stored solutes and the mechanisms of solute accumulation and depletion in a saline environment UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON 1975 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data VanDenburgh, A. S. Solute balance at Abert and Summer Lakes, south-central Oregon. (Closed-basin investigations) (Geological Survey Professional Paper 502-C) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. No.: I 19.16:502-C 1. Saline waters-Oregon-Abert Lake. 2. Saline waters-Oregon-Summer Lake. I. Title. II. Series. III. Series: United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 502-C. QE75.P9 No. 502-C fGB1625.07) 557.3'08s f553'.72'0979593) 75-619062 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-02689-9 CONTENTS P.1ge Page Abstract ... ..... ........ ....... .. .... ..... .. ....... ........ ........ ... .. ... ... ... ... ... .. C1 Solute bala!H"e ................................................................................... C10 Introduction ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Warner Basin Strategic Action Plan – Technical Report
    Warner Basin Strategic Action Plan – Technical Report WARNER BASIN AQUATIC HABITAT PARTNERSHIP OCTOBER 31, 2019 Warner Basin Aquatic Habitat Partnership Technical Report Table of Contents Executive Summary i 1 Introduction 2 2 Warner Basin – Geographic Context 2 3 Fish Community 9 4 Warner Basin Limiting Factors 15 5 Fish Passage and Screening Design 16 6 Effectiveness Monitoring 35 7 Summary 42 8 Literature Citations 43 Tables Table 2-1. Average annual climate summary for weather stations at Plush and Adel, OR. .... 5 Table 2-2. Peak flows for the Honey Creek Near Plush, Oregon gage (#10378500) operated by OWRD.............................................................................................................................................. 6 Table 2-3. Annual flow exceedance for the Honey Creek Near Plush, Oregon gage (#10378500) operated by OWRD. Annual flow exceedance values associated with fish passage flows are highlighted. ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Table 2-4. Peak flows for the Deep Creek Near Adel, Oregon gage (#10371500) operated by OWRD.............................................................................................................................................. 7 Table 2-5. Annual flow exceedance for the Deep Creek Near Adel, Oregon gage (#10371500) operated by OWRD. Annual flow exceedance values associated with fish passage flows are highlighted. ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior
    United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office 2600 SE 98th Avenue, Suite 100 Portland, Oregon 97266 Phone: (503) 231-6179 FAX: (503) 231-6195 Reply To: 8330.F0047(09) File Name: CREP BO 2009_final.doc TS Number: 09-314 TAILS: 13420-2009-F-0047 Doc Type: Final Don Howard, Acting State Executive Director U.S. Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency, Oregon State Office 7620 SW Mohawk St. Tualatin, OR 97062-8121 Dear Mr. Howard, This letter transmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) Biological and Conference Opinion (BO) and includes our written concurrence based on our review of the proposed Oregon Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP) to be administered by the Farm Service Agency (FSA) throughout the State of Oregon, and its effects on Federally-listed species in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Your November 24, 2008 request for informal and formal consultation with the Service, and associated Program Biological Assessment for the Oregon Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (BA), were received on November 24, 2008. We received your letter providing a 90-day extension on March 26, 2009 based on the scope and complexity of the program and the related species that are covered, which we appreciated. This Concurrence and BO covers a period of approximately 10 years, from the date of issuance through December 31, 2019. The BA also includes species that fall within the jurisdiction of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries Service).
    [Show full text]
  • History of the National Forest
    HISTORY OF THE FREMONT NATIONAL FOREST O Melva M. Bach. O Fremont National Forest Lakeview, Oregon 1981 CAPTAtN JOHN C. FRENONT FOREWORD Gifford Pinchot once said, "The Forest Service is the best organization in the government because of the people in it". In my opinion, the out-door-loving S persons who choose their life work in the Forest Service and other conservation agencies are among the greatest Perhaps this is because these devoted people are more interested in helping to wisely use and perpetuate our natural resources rather than to exploit them. The8emen and women employees of the Forest Service are loyal, dedicated, and hard-working persons They work many hours of unpaid overtime to get the job done They are unselfish, giving a great deal of their own time and effort to community activities, such as the Boy Scouts, Camp Fire Girls, 4-s, United Fund, Rotary, Lions, and other service organizations. The wives of these men are exceptional and fine women who do their part in community af fairs They snow that housing and living conditions in the Forest Service are sometimes undesirable and in isolated places, but they cheerfully accept them It has been very pleasant working for and with the great number of persons who have been on this forest I have appreciated this lengthy opportunity to know and make friends with some very fine people, and thank them for their help and pleasant associations One reason for this long opportunity was a letter I received from MrShirley Buck of the Regional Office when I started to work in Lakeview e said "It is hoped you will stay a considerable length of time" I thought he meant it.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for the Native Fishes of the Warner Basin and Alkali Subbasin
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Plan for the Threatened and Rare Native Fishes of the Warner Basin and Alkali Subbasin Warner Sucker (Castostom us ‘warmeren sir) I ‘=1W’~ Hutton Thi Chub Foskett Speckled Dace (Gila. bicolor ssp.) (Ril inichthys osenins ssp.) RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE NATIVE FISHES OF THE WARNER BASIN AND ALKALI SUBBASIN: Warner sucker (Threatened) Catostomus warnerensis Hutton tui chub (Threatened) Gila bicolor ssp. Foskett speckled dace (Threatened) Rhinichthys osculus ssp. Prepared By U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Oregon State Office) for Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Appoved: “I Date: DISCLAIMER PAGE Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions which are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Plans are reviewed by the public and submitted to additional peer review before they are adopted by the Service. Objectives will be attained and any necessary finds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Costs indicated for task implementation and/or time of achievement ofrecovery are estimates and subject to change. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor official positions or approval ofany individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position ofthe U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director or Director as approved.
    [Show full text]