2005 Environmental Scorecard for the Oregon Legislature

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2005 Environmental Scorecard for the Oregon Legislature 2005 ENVIRONMENTAL SCORECARD FOR THE OREGON LEGISLATURE OREGON LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS HONOR ROLL: DISHONOR ROLL: 100% RATED LEGISLATORS 0% RATED LEGISLATORS ON THE ENVIRONMENT ON THE ENVIRONMENT Senator Ginny Burdick Senator Roger Beyer (D-Portland) (R-Molalla) Representative Jackie Dingfelder Senator Ted Ferrioli (D-Portland) (R-John Day) Representative Mary Nolan Senator Charles Starr (D-Portland) (R-Hillsboro) Representative Diane Rosenbaum Representative Jerry Krummel (D-Portland) (R-Wilsonville) Representative Chip Shields Representative Kim Thatcher (D-Portland) (R-Keizer) Representative Carolyn Tomei (D-Milwaukie) You Didn’t Vote for More Sprawl and Pollution. DID YOUR LEGISLATORS? www.olcv.org KNOW THE SCORE A MESSAGE FROM OLCV’S EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS By using this Scorecard, you’ve taken the first step AND POLITICAL COMMITTEE towards protecting Oregon’ s environment: know- STEPHEN KAFOURY ing how your elected representatives voted. CHAIR Are they responsible stewards of the incredible DOUG MYERS resources we’re blessed with in Oregon? Or would TREASURER they destroy those resources for the benefit of MARY SCURLOCK a few? SECRETARY Do they hold polluters accountable for the toxic MATT BLEVINS MEEKY BLIZZARD messes they leave behind? Or do they shower those NICOLE CORDAN polluters with new tax breaks? KATY DAILY PETE FROST Do they focus on the legacy we leave our kids, willing to invest in long- WALT GORMAN term efforts to promote renewable energy and keep our neighborhoods NORMA GRIER great places to live? Or do they engage in short-term, me-first thinking at STEPHEN GRIFFITH the expense of future generations? CYLVIA HAYES FRED HEUTTE Too many legislators come down on the wrong side of these questions. GRATTAN KERANS Their votes show a clear and consistent pattern of siding with polluters, ERIC LEMELSON developers, and timber companies and against ordinary citizens. They LINDA PETERS would let more polluters off the hook and would despoil the legacy we SCOTT PRATT should be leaving our kids. AUDREY SIMMONS CLIFF TROW No other bill tells this story better than HB 3481, an effort by farmers and environmental groups to promote biodiesel as a renewable, locally grown, OLCV STAFF non-toxic alternative fuel. Oregon’s House Leadership killed the propos- al by demanding major new tax breaks for industrial polluters as “ran- JENNIFER DEMUTH som” for its passage, a ransom that would have created more pollution and FIELD ORGANIZER cost taxpayers dearly. KEVIN FINNEY POLITICAL DIRECTOR OLCV’s Scorecard is a tool with which you can fight back against this type of gamesmanship. At the detailed level, you can learn how your legislators CAROLINE FITCHETT TRAINING SPECIALIST voted on more than twenty specific environmental bills. Or, you can look at their overall score and learn what percentage of the votes they cast were JESSICA HAMILTON pro-environment. LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS DIRECTOR JOY KEEN And you can then take action. The Scorecard is the first step. Additional OFFICE MANAGER ideas are on page 22. KENDRA KIMBIRAUSKAS Individually, we may feel powerless to take action that dramatically improves PROGRAM AND COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR Oregon’s Legislature. But together, we are strong. MOLLY BAER KRAMER Together, we can create a government that protects our health today and DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR promotes a better future for our children tomorrow. MAT MARR JACKSON COUNTY ORGANIZER ANNE PERNICK FIELD ORGANIZER JONATHAN POISNER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Jonathan Poisner Executive Director CLAIRE SULLIVAN DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATE 2005 ENVIRONMENTAL SCORECARD FOR THE OREGON LEGISLATURE 3 OVERVIEW OF THE 2005 SESSION: MISSED OPPORTUNITIES he 2005 Legislative Session majority of our priority bills out of Department of Forestry scientists was marked by many battles the Senate during the session. say is sustainable, and voted to sig- T over environmental issues. In nificantly cut funding for the the end, we saw a few bright points of ASSESSING THE HOUSE: Columbia River Gorge progress on environmental bills that JUST PLAIN OFFENSIVE Commission. were part of the Oregon Conservation A majority of Oregonians under- ■ In a series of votes, the House Network’s Common Agenda (see sepa- stand that a healthy environment is majority acted to dramatically rate sidebar). In addition, compared to the key to a healthy economy. Yet, increase sprawling, uncontrolled previous sessions, fewer bills passed House leaders continue to argue that development onto Oregon farm- both chambers that weaken existing our clean air, clean water, and other land. safeguards that protect our air, water, environmental safeguards must be land, and wildlife. weakened in order to improve the WHAT ABOUT THE Yet, these positives were out- economy. In the long term, the poli- GOVERNOR? weighed by the Session’s missed cies they push would harm Oregon’s opportunities. Oregon’s House economy and threaten our children’s Governor Ted Kulongoski did not Leadership, in particular, stands in the future. take an active role in supporting the way of any meaningful effort to better Among the lowlights from the full set of conservation priorities for- protect Oregon’s environment. Due to House: warded by the Oregon Conservation the House Leadership’s hostility, much Network. However, he did show of our energy this Session was focused ■ The House failed to pass a biofuels leadership on several of the individ- on fighting their efforts to eliminate bill jointly backed by farmers and ual proposals. For instance, the funding for key clean air and clean environmental groups. It was a Governor included funding for two water safeguards and roll back the laws win-win solution that would pro- priorities, Conservation Investments that protect our natural resources for tect our air and help grow the and the Pesticide Use Reporting future generations. economy. Yet, House leaders held System, in his budget. He took The 2005 OLCV Scorecard it ransom, refusing to pass it unless administrative action to help estab- includes 17 House votes and 12 Senate it contained massive taxpayer sub- lish marine reserves to restore ocean votes on a range of issues, including a sidies to major polluters, a ransom fish populations, and he lobbied on few of the proactive bills we promoted that Senate leaders and the behalf of the biofuels bill. The as a part of the Common Agenda. Governor rightly rejected. Governor also vetoed a line in the ■ DEQ budget that would have pre- ASSESSING THE SENATE: House leaders tried to prevent the vented Oregon from adopting new Department of Environmental DECENT DEFENSE, WEAK “clean car” standards to protect our Quality (DEQ) from taking mean- OFFENSE air and combat global warming pol- ingful action to protect Oregon’s lution. The Oregon Senate deserves cred- air and water. The House-passed Counterbalancing these positive it for stopping anti-environmental DEQ budget would have eliminat- steps, the Governor supported a legislation that had passed the House ed funding for the Governor’s sweeping and dangerous land use bill - especially during the first five Willamette River cleanup and (Senate Bill 1037) that would have months of the session. Because many would have prevented DEQ from significantly expanded the scope of of these bills never passed out of adopting new tailpipe emission Ballot Measure 37, further threaten- Senate committees, there is no objec- standards that would require ing the state’s ability to prevent out- tive way to factor the Senate’s leader- automakers to cut harmful emis- of-control sprawl and protect farm- ship into the vote chart or their sions that pollute our air and con- land. The Governor’s failure to scores. tribute to global warming. endorse a bill to eliminate dangerous Unfortunately, the Senate made ■ House leaders also assaulted our levels of toxic pollutants from being some disappointing concessions on forests and natural treasures. A dumped into Oregon’s rivers also environmental issues during the final House majority voted to require helped prevent it from passing. And budget negotiations in late July. In logging levels beyond those that as described below, the Governor addition, the Senate failed to pass a 4 OREGON LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS signed three bills that roll back pro- ■ HB 3502 transfers the debt-ridden But as in 2003, the overall record tections for Oregon’s parks, rivers, Oregon State Fair to the Oregon is one of failure. The Legislature also and farmland, and let a fourth Parks Department, effectively continues to exhibit serious partisan become law without his signature. shifting lottery funds designated by battles on environmental issues, with Measure 66 for Parks into the few Republicans willing to buck their THE FINAL RESULTS: State Fair instead. party Leadership and vote pro-envi- WHAT ACTUALLY ■ ronment. Of 45 Republican legisla- HB 3494 allows for excessive tors, just one scored better than 40%. CHANGED groundwater withdrawals that will The outcome of the OCN In contrast, of 45 Democrats, only 8 threaten the health of the scored worse than 60%. Common Agenda is described on Deschutes River in central page 6. What else happened? Oregon. LOOKING TOWARDS 2007 There were a couple of bright ■ spots worth noting. Passage of Senate HB 2458 will lead to inappropriate The 2005 Legislative Session had Bill 82 will lead to a broad process to industrial development outside of some clear bright points and a higher engage citizens in determining the urban areas, leading to uncon- overall score. The coordinated effort future of land use planning and farm- trolled sprawl, unplanned develop- by the Oregon Conservation land protection in Oregon. In addi- ment, and higher taxes to support Network on common priorities, and tion, minimum energy efficiency infrastructure located far from a new lobbying presence by OLCV, standards will now be set for eleven population centers. helped. We hope the Common products not already covered by fed- Agenda also provides a new vehicle eral law. By 2020, this action is IMPROVED AVERAGE SCORE by which citizens can evaluate their expected to save as much electricity Bottom line, the 2005 Legislature legislators.
Recommended publications
  • NWLP-04-04-08.Pdf (4.544Mb)
    See Inside MEETINGMEETING NOTICESNOTICES Page 6 Volume 109 Number 7 April 4, 2008 Portland Schrader, Kroger garner AFL-CIO endorsements John Kroger was endorsed by the Oregon AFL-CIO’s Committee on Politi- cal Education (COPE) to be the state’s next attorney general, and State Sen. Kurt Schrader was picked to succeed Darlene Hooley in Congress. Delegates met March 27 in Northeast Portland to discuss races in the May 20 primary. To endorse a candidate requires a two-thirds majority vote of delegates. Earlier this year, the Oregon AFL-CIO endorsed Jeff Merkley in the Democ- ratic primary for U.S. Senate and Ben Westlund for State Treasurer. Merkley is facing Steve Novick in the Democratic primary, with the winner taking on Re- publican incumbent Gordon Smith. Westlund is unopposed. Three Democratic state senators vying for secretary of state will fight it out in the primary without an endorsement from the AFL-CIO. The state labor fed- eration took no action in the race between Rick Metzger, Vicki Walker and Kate Brown. A motion just to consider endorsing in the race failed to get enough votes to proceed. Kroger, a Lewis & Clark Law School professor and a former federal prose- cutor, is in a heated battle with Lake Oswego State Rep. Greg Macpherson in Responding to solar demand the Democratic primary. The four-term incumbent, Democrat Hardy Myers, is In response to an increase in demand for trained solar electricians, the NECA-IBEW Local 280 training center retiring, and no Republican has filed for the post, which means the winner of the in Tangent is conducting additional 16-hour solar installation classes for journeymen electricians.
    [Show full text]
  • Lee Beyer Announces Plans to Run for Re-Election to Senate District 6, Representing Central Lane and Linn Counties
    LEE BEYER ANNOUNCES PLANS TO RUN FOR RE-ELECTION TO SENATE DISTRICT 6, REPRESENTING CENTRAL LANE AND LINN COUNTIES Current Public Utility Commission Chair will leave position to run for re-election to Oregon State Senate November 12, 2009 SPRINGFIELD – Current Public Utility Commission Chair Lee Beyer announced today his intention to seek election to Senate District 6 during the 2010 election. Senate District 6 covers central Lane and Linn counties including the communities of Brownsville, Coburg, Creswell, Eugene, Sodaville, and Springfield. Beyer previously represented most of the area before being appointed to the PUC in 2001 and legislative reapportionment. “I am fortunate to have been allowed to spent over three decades representing the public in various capacities,” said Beyer. “While my current position has been challenging and rewarding, the timing is right for me to retire from full-time employment and return to a job I’ve always loved – serving my fellow citizens in our state’s Legislature.” In 2001 Gov. Kitzhaber appointed Beyer to the Oregon Public Utility Commission. Gov. Kulongoski asked Beyer to chair the Commission in 2003, serving as the agency’s chief executive. As a commissioner he has been responsible for protecting consumers and businesses from unfair rate hikes and poor service by telephone providers and energy companies. Beyer will retire from the Commission in early spring. "Lee has proven himself as an effective legislator for the citizens of Lane County and as an effective advocate for the citizens of Oregon as the chair of the Public Utility Commission," said Governor Ted Kulongoski. "While his leadership will be missed at the PUC, the citizens of Oregon will continue to benefit from his public service as the next State Senator serving District 6." Beyer has a long history of public service to Oregon, including over 10 years of previous experience in both the Senate and the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Outspoken Recently Authorized the Move and Negotiated a Multi-Year Lease
    NEW DPLC OFFICE IN DOWNTOWN SPRINGFIELD May 2008 DPLC MOVES TO NEW OFFICE SPACE COMMUNITY AT 826 A STREET IN SPRINGFIELD EQUALITY PROSPERITY THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY DPLC volunteers have moved our office from OF LANE North Eugene to a new office space at 826 A COUNTY St. in Springfield. The Executive Committee outspoken recently authorized the move and negotiated www.dplc.org a multi-year lease. The new office is in a very visible downtown Democratic Party of Lane County location near the Post Office and the EMX 826 A St., Springfield, Oregon 97477 P.O. Box 11138, Eugene, Oregon 97440-3338 transit line which runs from Eugene. The Office Hours: Tues & Thurs from 9 am-noon previous tenant was the Springfield Beacon. Email: [email protected] With a total of 1,342 sq. ft., there are 7 rooms, Phone: 541-484-5099 | Fax: 541-762-1081 wiring for high speed internet connectivity, Website: www.dplc.org and 8 phone lines. The largest room measures IN THIS ISSUE 11.5” x 26” and is perfect for holding DPLC Moves to New Office Space 1 committee meetings. Keep Your Eye on the November Prize 2 LTD’s EmX operates from 6 am to 11 pm You’re Invited to Two Election Parties 2 on weekdays. It takes about 16 minutes to Candidates Encouraged to Debate 3 travel from downtown Eugene to downtown Get Out and Volunteer 3 Springfield. There is no charge to ride. Dorthy Craig Update 3 In Memorium: Bruce Rose 4 Thanks to all our volunteers who helped find the space and organize the move! An Open House is being planned for shortly after the May 20th election.
    [Show full text]
  • Lane County Voters Pamphlet
    LANE COUNTY VOTERS’ LANE COUNTY VOTERS’ LANEPAM COUNTYPHLET PAMPH LET VOTERS’MAY 19, 2015 SPECIALPAMPHLET ELECTION MAY 19, 2015 SPECIAL ELECTION MAY 21, 2019 SPECIAL ELECTION The publication and distribution of this pamphlet is provided by Thethe publicationCounty Clerk and at distributionthe direction of ofthis the pamphlet County Commissioners.is provided by theThe County candidate Clerk and at themeasure direction information of the County was provided Commissioners. by Thecandidates, candidate special and measure districts, information and other interested was provided parties by that candidates,chose to participate special districts, in this portion and other of the interested election partiesprocess. that chose to participate in this portion of the election process. Your ballot will contain only those measures and candidates Yourwhich ballot you willare containeligible onlyto vote those on, measuresbased on whereand candidates you live. which you are eligible to vote on, based on where you live. Table of Contents Community College Candidate Statements: Lane Community College .........................................................................................................................20-3 Education Service District Candidate Statements: Lane Education Service District ................................................................................................................20-5 School District Candidate Statements: Bethel School District #52.........................................................................................................................20-6
    [Show full text]
  • Voters' Pamphlet Candidates November 2008
    2of 2 Voters’ Pamphlet Candidates Oregon General Election November 4, 2008 Bill Bradbury Oregon Secretary of State This Voters’ Pamphlet is provided for assistance in casting your vote by mail ballot. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE ELECTIONS DIVISION BILL BRADBURY JOHN LINDBACK DIRECTOR SECRETARY OF STATE 255 CAPITOL ST NE, SUITE 501 JEAN STRAIGHT SALEM, OREGON 97310 DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE (503) 986-1518 My Fellow Oregonians: Once again, it’s time for Oregon voters to make good on the bargain we make for living in a free country. It’s time to vote. In these pages, you will see the candidates running for office this year. These are the words they’ve chosen to represent themselves to you. Read them carefully and evaluate what they have to say because the decisions made by our elected officials make a difference in our lives. Voting is only one of the duties we share in preserving our blessings of liberty. We serve on juries. We pay our taxes. We serve in the armed forces. We don’t litter. And we vote. Voting is no mere footnote to democracy. It’s what separates us from tyrants, a practice we’ve nurtured and encouraged for more than two centuries and preserve today as a bulwark in keeping our country safe and free. It’s already been an exciting year. In the spring, Oregon saw a huge surge in voter registration and we may well set new records in November for turnout. Registering, remember, is only half the process and doesn’t mean a lot unless you actually vote.
    [Show full text]
  • Ridenbaugh Press
    The Oregon Political Field Guide Map: From U.S. Census 2 The OREGON POLITICAL FIELD GUIDE Randy Stapilus RIDENBAUGH PRESS RIDENBAUGH PRESS Carlton, Oregon 3 Copyright © 2012 Ridenbaugh Press All Rights Reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any means, without prior permission of the publisher. Composition and editing by Ridenbaugh Press, Carlton, Oregon. Cover design by Randy Stapilus. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data: Stapilus, Randy The Oregon Political Field Guide Includes bibliographical references ISBN 978-0-9824668-2-7(softbound) 1. Oregon. 2. Politics 3. Geography 4. Government-Public Policy. I. Title. Printed in the United States of America. March 2012 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 4 Contents Introduction Federal President Senators U.S. Representatives State Governor Statewide officials Legislature Judiciary Counties Cities Beyond the Majors Reading 5 Introduction The Oregon Blue Book is a classic. For decades it has been one of the finest state references anywhere in the county, one of the most information-packed as well as slickly-produced. It's on my bookshelf (actually, most of the editions from the last few decades crowd my bookshelves), and it (they) get regularly used. But no book can or should try to be all things. As a state publication (and despite its source in the Secretary of State's office), it goes a little light on election results, probably an appropriate decision. Anyone who wants the details, especially as they move toward the microscopic, has to look elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Page 1 of 2
    OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY November 27, 2011 To: Chairman Matthew Donegan Members of the Oregon State Board of Higher Education Chancellor George Pernsteiner Chair Donegan, Members and Chancellor Pernsteiner: We, the undersigned members of the Oregon Legislature, were surprised and deeply disappointed to learn of the Board of Higher Education’s pending decision to not renew Richard Lariviere’s contract as President of the University of Oregon. We urge you to reconsider. The announcement of the decision to not renew President Lariviere’s contract was a shock to us, to the greater UO community and to those who have been at the forefront of fighting for better educational opportunities for Oregon’s youth. President Lariviere has earned the trust and admiration of elected officials, community leaders, UO students, faculty, staff, alumni, and donors. Under his leadership, the university has dramatically increased fundraising, grown enrollment, and attracted the most diverse and well qualified student body in recent history. The UO has improved its student retention rate, become better able to attract and keep top caliber faculty, and positioned itself to better educate more Oregon students than ever before. It is no secret that there have been significant stylistic and policy differences between President Lariviere and the Chancellor and some members of the board. Differing viewpoints are acceptable in public policy discussions. Full deliberation of issues should not only be tolerated, but encouraged. President Lariviere is a world-class university president with exceptional leadership capabilities. We believe that your pending action sends the wrong message to the public, to the academic community, to policy makers, and to other university presidents, both current and future.
    [Show full text]