DOCSLIB.ORG

Historical Touring Map of Lakewood

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

This project was funded with a BENEFITS of HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN LAKEWOOD Lakewood Lodging Tax Grant and Pierce HISTORICAL County Historical Preservation Grant Compiled by the Lakewood Landmarks Landmark Criteria Benefits for the Economic Benefits Environmental Benefits Heritage Advisory Board 2013 and 2015. And Responsibilities Property Owner for the Community • Re-using existing buildings eliminates For further information please To be considered “qualified” for tax • Special Tax Valuation: A local tax • Rehabilitation of historic buildings unnecessary landfill waste. In 1996 Touring Map incentives properties must be listed incentive program, reducing property creates more jobs and tax revenue than 35-38% of all landfill waste was from contact: www.cityoflakewood.us on the Lakewood Landmark Register. tax for 10 years for qualified, locally construction of new buildings or roads. construction and demolition debris. of LAKEWOOD, WA registered properties. • Demolishing a building 25’ wide by 120’ Criteria for placement on the register: A New Jersey study, Economic Impacts • Federal Investment Tax Credit: 20% of Historic Preservation, developed deep erases the recycling of 1,344,000 • The property must be 50 years old, or federal income tax credit for qualified conservative “recipes” for assessing the aluminum cans. a district that has resources more than income producing properties. economic impact of historic preservation. • Reusing buildings and materials has two 50 years old, • Studies show historic properties within For example, for every $1 million significant environmental benefits: it spares For further information on area dollars spent on nonresidential historic • Have retained integrity of location, historic districts have higher property the resources that would otherwise be used history and resources consult: rehabilitation 38.3 jobs, $1,302,000 to make new products, and it prevents the design, setting, materials, workmanship, appreciation value than comparables not www.historicfortsteilacoom.com feeling and association, and in historic districts. in income, and $202,000 in taxes is waste of resources that have already been generated. The same amount spent fashioned into products and structures. www.lakewoodhistorical.org • Significance based on: 1) association • Consideration in Land Use Actions under on new nonresidential construction • Investing in historic neighborhoods www.lakewood-chamber.com with events– broad patterns of Washington State Environmental Policy generates 36.1 jobs, $1,223,000 in results in less sprawl. Tacoma Public Library Northwest Room national, state, or local history, 2) Act review. income, and $189,000 in taxes. association with lives of persons New development requires the expansion www.tpl.lib.us • Use of special building code for • Rehabilitation results in more local and significant in national, state, or local of basic infrastructure and services such www.piercecountylibrary.org existing structures. jobs and business for local suppliers. history, 3) embodies distinctive as roads, water, sewage, utilities, and www.lakewoldgardens.org Historic Sites characteristics of a type, period, style, Economic Benefits of Due to the nature of rehabilitation work, it fire and police protection. In contrast, by www.fortlewismuseum.com or method of design, 4) contains relies on local craftspeople and suppliers. rehabilitating our historic neighborhoods www.mcchordairmuseum.org of the Heritage Tourism New construction involves more off-site information important in prehistory or and downtowns we experience growth assembling that uses fewer workers and without the corresponding increase in Lakewood Landmarks and history, or 5) is an outstanding work of The National Trust for Historic Preservation Lakes District is often done out-of-town or even out- expensive services and infrastructure. Heritage Advisory Board a designer or builder who has made a defines heritage tourism as “traveling to of-state. Of course, the income earned by Although services in historic areas may need substantial contribution to the arts. experience the places, artifacts, and activities that authentically represent the stories and these local workers and trades people has upgrading, it is certainly less expensive, less Responsibilities for registered properties people of the past and present.” a multiplier effect on the economy since damaging to the environment, and results in includes obtaining a certificate of those same workers and business owners less sprawl than expanding services to new • Heritage travelers spend more, do more, appropriateness before any alteration spend their money locally. areas on the urban fringe. and stay longer than other types of tourists. may be made to the character defining elements of the landmark that are • Visiting historic and cultural sites is second only to shopping for people on identified in the nomination form. “…I would suggest to you that any claim for rights that is not balanced with responsibilities removes the civility from vacation to heritage sites. civilization, and gives us an entitlement mentality as a nation of mere consumers of public services rather than a nation CITY OF LAKEWOOD • 1 in 3 international visitors to the US of citizens. A consumer has rights; a citizen has responsibilities that accompany those rights. Historic preservation is 6000 Main Street SW • Lakewood WA 98499 tours a historic or cultural attraction. a responsibility movement rather than rights movement. It is a movement that urges us toward the responsibility of (253) 589-2489 • www.cityoflakewood.us stewardship, not merely the right of ownership. Stewardship of our historic built environment, certainly; but stewardship of the meaning and memory of our communities manifested in those buildings as well.” The primary duty of the Board is to identify and actively encourage the conservation of the City’s historic resources by establishing CITY OF LAKEWOOD • 6000 Main Street SW • Lakewood WA 98499 and maintaining a register of historic landmarks, landmark sites, historic special review districts, and conservation districts; reviewing – Don Rypkema proposed changes to register properties; raising community awareness of the City’s history and historic resources; and serving as the (253) 589-2489 • www.cityoflakewood.us Nationally recognized expert in Economics City’s primary resource in matters of history, historic planning, and preservation, as provided for in this chapter (LMC 2.48.035) TIMELINE of HISTORICAL EVENTS IN LAKEWOOD The Hudson’s Bay Company Byrd Cemetery Boatman- Rhodesleigh brings a group of settlers Fort from the Red River Valley Ainsworth House in Canada. Fort Nisqually cannot supply the settlers Steilacoom with the supplies they were promised in Canada. Willis Boatman Rhodesleigh is completed, Park Most settlers leave. A few Washington becomes constructs a an English Tudor country stay and one builds a cabin a territory. hunting cabin. Washington Territory John Ainsworth adds on to estate for Henry A. Rhodes. Colonial Center is complete, Washington State where the Fort Steilacoom buys the Fort Steilacoom Boatman’s hunting cabin Villa Madera (Villa Carmen) one of the first planned leases the Western State buildings are today. All of The Puget Sound Byrd Cemetery is Chief Leschi is buildings from the Federal to make the Boatman- built on 18 acres of virgin Tacoma Speedway fails Mueller Harkins Hanger is suburban shopping centers Hospital farm to Pierce the Red River settlers are area becomes established and used tried for murder Fort Steilacoom is Government, and they Ainsworth House look as it Thornewood (Castle) Cole/Smith house evergreen forest on the and becomes Mueller constructed to service the west of the Mississippi, Norton Clapp calls County to be used as gone after a couple of years. American Territory for pioneers until 1882. and hanged. decommissioned. become a mental hospital. does today. is constructed. is constructed. shores of Gravelly Lake. Harkins Airport. Tacoma Airport. including Lakewood Theater. Rhodesleigh home. a park. 1841 1844 1846 1849 1853 1855 1858 1861 1868 1869 1870 1874 1878 1889 1911 1912 1914 1917 1919 1920 1922 1924 1929 1932 1937 1938 1939 1946-53 1965 1996 2006 Joseph Heath moves into In May a group of Indian Wars begin. Fort The Civil War begins. The Federal Government The Federal Government Washington Tacoma Speedway holds its Hopkins House is Tacoma Speedway and Woodbrook Hunt Club Custer School, also known Little Church on the Prairie Chauncey Griggs obtains Lakewood takes the abandoned Red River Snoqualmie Indians come Steilacoom offers haven Federal soldiers are called buys the Hudson Bay donates the former military becomes a state. first race on 5 mile, then 3 constructed as a summer Indianopolis are the only is established. as the “Little Red School is created out of an old preliminary drawings over management Valley settler’s cabin. to Fort Nisqually to check to settlers threatened by back east. The fort is staffed Company assets in reservation to Washington ½ mile, then 2 mile tracks. retreat, typical of lakeside two Class A tracks in the House” is constructed. grocery store building. for a house by Frank of Fort Steilacoom His expensive lifestyle in on a Chief’s daughter living Indian war parties. by volunteers. the Northwest. Territory for use as an John Flett builds a house. retreats on American Lake. country, Tacoma’s is the faster Lloyd Wright. The house Park from England forced his family with a fort Indian. A gun “asylum for the insane
Recommended publications
  • Lakewood Colonial Center E • a • S • T

    Lakewood Colonial Center E • a • S • T

    OFFERING MEMORANDUM LAKEWOOD COLONIAL CENTER E • A • S • T LAKEWOOD COLONIAL CENTER EAST • 9522-9528 BRIDGEPORT WAY SW, LAKEWOOD, WA 98499 Investment Contacts Scott Clements 206.445.7664 LAKEWOOD [email protected] COLONIAL David Butler CENTER 206.445.7665 [email protected] E • A • S • T 1218 Third Avenue Table of Contents Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101 Investment Summary .............................3 www.orioncp.com Property Overview ..................................5 Tenant Profiles ........................................11 Market Overview ....................................13 Detailed Financial Information Available by Request LAKEWOOD COLONIAL CENTER EAST • OFFERING MEMORANDUM • 2 Investment Summary • PRICE .....................................$10,375,000 • ADDRESS ........................................ 9522-9528 • OCCUPANCY ............................................. 94% Bridgeport Way SW, • CAP RATE ............................................. 6.5% Lakewood, WA 98499 • YEAR BUILT/REMODEL ..............1955/1988/2018 • PRICE PER SF ...................................... $301.00 • NAME ............... Lakewood Colonial Center East • PARKING ...................... 192 Spaces; 5.6/1,000 SF • PRICE PER SF LAND ...............................$70.70 • LEASEABLE SF .................................34,465 SF • LAND SIZE ....................................... 146,797 SF LAKEWOOD COLONIAL CENTER EAST • OFFERING MEMORANDUM • 3 Investment Summary • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ORION Commercial Partners is pleased to offer for sale Lakewood
  • Nisqually Transmission Line Relocation Project

    Nisqually Transmission Line Relocation Project

    Nisqually Transmission Line Relocation Project Preliminary Environmental Assessment Bonneville Power Administration Fort Lewis Military Reservation Nisqually Indian Tribe Bureau of Indian Affairs October 2004 Nisqually Transmission Line Relocation Project Responsible Agencies and Tribe: U.S. Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration (Bonneville); U.S. Department of Defense, Fort Lewis Military Reservation (Fort Lewis); the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA); and the Nisqually Indian Tribe (Tribe). Name of Proposed Project: Nisqually Transmission Line Relocation Project Abstract: Bonneville proposes to remove and reroute two parallel transmission lines that cross the Nisqually Indian Reservation in Thurston County, Washington. Bonneville’s easement across the Reservation for a portion of the Olympia-Grand Coulee line has expired. Though Bonneville has a perpetual easement for the Olympia-South Tacoma line across the Reservation, the Tribe has asked Bonneville to remove both lines so the Tribe can eventually develop the land for its community. The land fronts State Route 510 and is across the highway from the Tribe’s Red Wind Casino. In addition, the Tribe would like Bonneville to remove the two lines from a parcel next to the Reservation that Fort Lewis owns. The Tribe is working with Fort Lewis to obtain this parcel, which also has frontage on SR 510. Bonneville is proposing to remove the portions of these lines on the Reservation and on the Fort-owned parcel and rebuild them south of SR 510 on Fort Lewis property. Fort Lewis is willing to have these lines on their federal property, in exchange for other in-holdings currently owned by Thurston County that the Tribe would purchase and turn over to Fort Lewis.
  • Major General Timothy J. Lowenberg

    Major General Timothy J. Lowenberg

    MAJOR GENERAL TIMOTHY J. LOWENBERG The Adjutant General, Washington Major General Timothy J. Lowenberg was appointed Adjutant General of the State of Washington on 13 September 1999. As the Adjutant General, he is commander of all Washington Army and Air National Guard forces and Director of the State’s Emergency Management and Enhanced 911 programs. General Lowenberg also serves as Homeland Security Advisor to the Governor of Washington and as State Administrative Agent for all United States Department of Homeland Security grants awarded to Washington’s state, local, tribal and non-profit agencies and organizations. In addition, he serves as Chair of Homeland Defense and Homeland Security of the Adjutants General Association of the United States; Chair of the Governors Homeland Security Advisors Council (National Governors Association Center for Best Practices); Chair of the Governor’s Domestic Security Sub-committee; and Chair of the Governor's 2010 Winter Olympics Task Force Security Committee. From 2005 through 2008, he served as a founding Tri-Chair of the National Homeland Security Consortium - a coalition of more than two-dozen public and private sector national associations. General Lowenberg is a distinguished graduate of the Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps. He was commissioned in 1968 concurrent with award of a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science from the University of Iowa. He earned a Doctor of Jurisprudence degree from the University of Iowa College of Law in 1971 and has served as Adjunct Professor of Law at the University of Puget Sound School of Law and Seattle University School of Law from 1973 to present.
  • 194Th Wing Redesignated by 2Nd Lt

    194Th Wing Redesignated by 2Nd Lt

    Fall 2015 194th Wing redesignated By 2nd Lt. Hans Zeiger Wing has become a poor description Wing’s purpose, said Horn. “All of for this composite organization, and what we do is operations,” he said. JOINT BASE LEWIS-MCCHORD— doctrinally incorrect,” said Maj. Jes- With the shorter title, “less is The 194th Regional Support Wing se Ruhl, Wing executive officer, in more,” said Horn. “The name re- was redesignated as the 194th Wing remarks at the ceremony. flects a big tent.” in a ceremony at French Theater Even as the 194th has proved its The 252nd Group was the major here on August 8. In the new desig- value to the Guard’s federal mission, forerunner of the 194th Wing, said nation, the 194th will be under the its designation as a “regional sup- Ruhl in a brief description of the U.S. Space Command, while it was port wing” was a point of confusion, Wing’s history. In 1976, the Group previously under the Air Combat said Col. Jeremy Horn, 194th Wing took on a medical detachment at Command. commander. The word “support” Camp Murray to support the “The term Regional Support doesn’t adequately describe the (CONTINUED on PAGE 8) In this issue: Airmen lend support at fires Exercise Ever- and civilians from Incident green Tremor Management Teams as they Commander’s served in various roles in the Corner: “What’s fight against wildfires in Northern and Central Wash- in a Name?” ington. Operation Husky Air National Guardsmen Airborne have been supporting fire- fighting efforts and incident Airman Perez- commanders in seven differ- Resop recognized ent locations, including the as services Air- Okanogan Complex, which man of the Year has now become the largest wildfire in state history.
  • Pierce County Biodiversity Network Assessment August 2004

    Pierce County Biodiversity Network Assessment August 2004

    Pierce County Biodiversity Network Assessment August 2004 Pierce County Biodiversity Network Assessment – August 2004 Acknowledgements Pierce County Planning and Land Services Department-Advance Planning Division Katherine Brooks, Senior Planner Karen Trueman, GIS Specialist Chip Vincent, Principal Planner Pierce County Executive’s Office Debby Hyde, Special Projects Coordinator Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife John Jacobson, Senior GIS Analyst, Habitat Program Marc McCalmon, Landscape Conservation Analyst, Habitat Program Erik Neatherlin, Landscape Conservation Planner, Habitat Program Michelle Tirhi, Urban Biologist-South Puget Sound Region University of Washington, Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Unit Karen Dvornich, Public Education and Outreach Coordinator, NatureMapping Program and Washington GAP Analysis Project Assistant Chris Grue, Principal Investigator and Leader, WACFWRU Metro Parks Tacoma John Garner, Education Coordinator Tahoma Audubon Society Bryan Flint, Conservation Coordinator Puyallup River Watershed Council Dave Seabrook TerraLogic GIS Chris Hansen, Principal Levon Yengoyan, Principal Authors Katherine Brooks, Pierce County Planning and Land Services Karen Dvornich, University of Washington Michelle Tirhi, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Erik Neatherlin, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Marc McCalmon, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife John Jacobson, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Reference Citation Brooks, K., K.M. Dvornich, M. Tirhi, E. Neatherlin, M. McCalmon, and
  • What's in a Name? John Swan and Swan Creek Park

    What's in a Name? John Swan and Swan Creek Park

    What’s in a Name? John Swan and Swan Creek Park By Claire Keller-Scholz Art, Culture, & Heritage Administrator for Metro Parks Tacoma Park History On the border between southeast Tacoma and the Puyallup Tribal Reservation is a 373 acre park named for the creek that runs through it. Swan Creek Park is going through the midst of a Master Plan update process this year, and the public had questions about the origins of the name. Most of the written history of the park focuses in the 1930s and ‘40s, when the city built housing for war workers in the greenspace along the south east edge of Tacoma. The Salishan neighborhood extended into what is now Swan Creek Park, with 1,600 units of housing built by 1943. The houses were never intended to be permanent residences, and in the mid- 1950s many of them were pulled down. But how did the creek get its name? A rumor recently emerged that the park was named for an “Indian Agent” who interned Native Americans during the 1850s Treaty Wars. There was a man named John Swan who was put in charge of Fox Island when it was used to confine non-combatant native peoples during the period in question, but he was not the man for whom the park is named. Research indicates that Swan Creek was named for John and Jane Swan, Puyallup tribal members who lived nearby the land feature in the 1890s. [Author’s note: since this article was first published, it has come to the author’s attention that there is an additional source of the name “Swan Creek”.
  • The Trials of Leschi, Nisqually Chief

    The Trials of Leschi, Nisqually Chief

    Seattle Journal for Social Justice Volume 5 Issue 1 Article 14 11-1-2006 The Trials of Leschi, Nisqually Chief Kelly Kunsch Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sjsj Recommended Citation Kunsch, Kelly (2006) "The Trials of Leschi, Nisqually Chief," Seattle Journal for Social Justice: Vol. 5 : Iss. 1 , Article 14. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sjsj/vol5/iss1/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Publications and Programs at Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Seattle Journal for Social Justice by an authorized editor of Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 67 The Trials of Leschi, Nisqually Chief Kelly Kunsch1 His people’s bitterness is etched into stone: A MEMORIAL TO CHIEF LESCHI 1808-1858 AN ARBITRATOR OF HIS PEOPLE JUDICIALLY MURDERED, FEBRUARY 19, 18582 There is probably no one convicted of murder more beloved by his people than a man named Leschi. Among other things, he has a neighborhood in Seattle, Washington named after him, a city park, a marina, restaurants and stores, as well as a school on the Puyallup Indian Reservation. His name is revered by Northwest Indians and respected by non-Indians who know his story. And yet, he remains, legally, a convicted murderer. For years there has been a small movement to clear Leschi’s name. However, it was only two years ago, almost 150 years after his conviction, that
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

    National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places NATIONAL Registration Form REGISTER This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See Instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the Instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property historic name________Adjutant General's Residence___________________________ other names/site number___Building 118___________________________________________ 2. Location street & number Camp Murray D not for publication city, town Tacoma C3 vicinity state Washington code WA county Pierce code 053 zip code 98430 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property EH private S building(s) Contributing Noncontributing CH public-local CH district 1 0 buildings HO, public-State D site _ _ sites D public-Federal EH structure _ _ structures [U object _ _ objects 1_ 0_ Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously N/A________________ listed in the National Register 0 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this S] nomination d request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part.
  • Washington Heritage Register

    Washington Heritage Register

    WASHINGTON STATE Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation WWASHINGTON HHERITAGE RREGISTER A) Identification Property Name: Acheson Cabin Address: 1017 9th Avenue City: Fox Island County: Pierce B) Site Access (describe site access, restrictions, etc.) The Acheson Cabin is located on the grounds of the Fox Island Museum and Historical Society at the intersection of 9th Avenue and Kamus Drive. It is about 1 mile from the main road of Fox Island, Island Boulevard. It is reachable by car by taking the Wollochet Drive exit from SR 16 and following the directions from there over the Fox Island Bridge, which turns into Island Boulevard. Signs help to direct visitors to the site. C) Property owner(s), Address and Zip Name: Fox Island Museum and Historical Society Address: 1017 9th Avenue City: Fox Island State: WA Zip: 98333 D) Legal boundary description and boundary justification Tax No./Parcel: 02-201-25-009 Boundary Justification: The Acheson Cabin is the boundary of the nomination (see figure in Map section). FORM PREPARED BY Name: Julie Herling Address: 6304 23rd St. NW City / State / Zip: Gig Harbor, WA 98335 Phone: 253.265.8342 WASHINGTON STATE Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation WWASHINGTON HHERITAGE RREGISTER E) Category of Property (Choose One) building structure (irrigation system, bridge, etc.) district object (statue, grave marker, vessel, etc.) cemetery/burial site historic site (site of an important event) archaeological site traditional cultural property (spiritual or creation site, etc.) cultural landscape (habitation, agricultural, industrial, recreational, etc.) F) Area of Significance – Check as many as apply The property belongs to the early settlement, commercial development, or original native occupation of a community or region.
  • Fact Sheet for the NPDES Permit for the JBLM Solo Point WWTP

    Fact Sheet for the NPDES Permit for the JBLM Solo Point WWTP

    Permit No.: WA-002195-4 Fort Lewis - Solo Point WWTP Fact Sheet NPDES Permit Number: WA-002195-4 Technical Contact: Tonya Lane 1-800-424-4372 (within Region 10) Email: [email protected] The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Plans To Reissue A Wastewater Discharge Permit To: Solo Point Wastewater Treatment Plant U.S. Department of Defense Department of the Army Joint Base Lewis McChord, WA 98433-5000 and The State of Washington Proposes to Certify the Permit and Issue a Consistency Determination EPA Proposes NPDES Permit Reissuance. EPA proposes to reissue a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit to the Solo Point Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) at the Fort Lewis Army Base. The permit sets conditions on the discharge--or release--of pollutants from the Solo Point WWTP to the Puget Sound. In order to ensure protection of water quality and human health, the permit places limits on the types and amounts of pollutants that can be discharged. This Fact Sheet includes: - information on public comment, public hearing, and appeal procedures - a description of the current discharge and current biosolids practices - a listing of past and proposed effluent limitations, and other conditions - a map and description of the discharge location - detailed technical material supporting the conditions in the permit The State of Washington Proposes Certification and Consistency Determination. The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) intends to certify the NPDES permit for the Solo Point WWTP under section 401 of the Clean Water Act. Page 1 of 49 Permit No.: WA-002195-4 Fort Lewis - Solo Point WWTP Public Comment.
  • 96> ? SOLDIER in the SOUTHWEST: the CAREER of GENERAL AV

    96> ? SOLDIER in the SOUTHWEST: the CAREER of GENERAL AV

    Soldier in the Southwest: the career of General A. V. Kautz, 1869-1886 Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Wallace, Andrew Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 11/10/2021 12:35:25 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/552260 7?/ /96> ? zyz /, / {LOjO. >2y SOLDIER IN THE SOUTHWEST: THE CAREER OF GENERAL A. V. KAUTZ, 1869-1886 by ANDREW WALLACE Volume I A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In The Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1968 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction by Andrew W h-U r c p __________________________________ entitled _________ Soldier in the Southwest:______________ The Career of General A. V. Kautz, 1869-1886 be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy_________________________ Dissertation Director Date After inspection of the final copy of the dissertation, the following members of the Final Examination Committee concur in its approval and recommend its acceptance:* This approval and acceptance is contingent on the candidate's adequate performance and defense of this dissertation at the final oral examination. The inclusion of this sheet bound into the library copy of the dissertation is evidence of satisfactory performance at the final examination.
  • Unclassified

    Unclassified

    (UNCLASSIFIED) Information Paper AAMH 6 MAR 2018 SUBJECT: U.S. Army Museum Enterprise Overview - HQDA20180129X6RWYB DACOWITS RFIs for March 2018 1. Purpose – Answer the following three RFIs in support of Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Services’ upcoming March 2018 Meeting a. What financial and/or manpower support do the Department/Services provide to various museums/memorials/education centers? b. Please specify dollar and full time employee (FTE) support by name of museum/memorial/education center and location. c. Please specify how supporting these museums/memorials/education centers contributes to your Department/Service’s Mission. 2. Background – As of 01 December, 2016, the Army organized its museums under the Army Museum Enterprise (AME), which was established by Army Directive (AD) 2016- 39. The AME is a management construct for managing Army Museums and is headquartered by Museums Directorate (MD) within the U.S. Army Center of Military History. The AME is composed of the following types of activities: a. Museums - Museums are appropriated fund entities organized on a permanent basis that use a professional staff, possess and manage historical artifacts and art, exhibit artifacts and historical materials, educate Soldiers and visitors on a regular basis, and meet the requirements of Army Regulation (AR) 870-20 and this interim policy. b. Training Support Facilities (TSFs) - TSFs are designed for the preservation and storage of obsolete, prototype, experimental, first production, and field-modified materiel (current technology) for military purposes. TSFs are exclusively for training Soldiers and supporting research and development, and therefore are not open to the public. c. Historical Collections - Historical collections are collections of artifacts and art that serve as repositories of technology and material culture and are maintained for research and the education and training of Army Soldiers and Civilians.